Artsakh preparing for parliamentary elections

Artsakh preparing for parliamentary elections
22.05.2010 15:03

Lusine Avanesyan

A day of silence has been announced ahead of the parliamentary
elections in Nagorno Karabakh scheduled for May 23. The parties have
stopped the election campaign to give an opportunity to the voters to
make a decision.

Seventeen deputies will be elected through the majoritarian system,
another sixteen will be elected through the proportional system.

Four parties are running for Parliament – the Democratic Party of
Artsakh headed by National assembly speaker Ashot Ghulyan, the Free
Motherland led by Prime Minister Ara Harutyunyan, the Armenian
Revolutionary Federation and the Communists.

Minister slams European body’s resolution on Karabakh – state TV

Public Television of Armenia
May 21 2010

Armenian minister slams European body’s resolution on Karabakh – state TV

Armenian Foreign Minister Edvard Nalbandyan has slammed 20 May
resolution of the European Parliament, which called for withdrawal of
Armenian troops from "occupied Azerbaijani territories".

"Provisions contained in the [European Parliament’s] report
[resolution on the South Caucasus], pertaining to Nagornyy Karabakh
are not in accordance with either the Madrid principles [of the
Karabakh settlement], the L’Aquila statement [statement of presidents
of countries that co-chair the OSCE Minsk Group], or the Moscow
[Meindorf] declaration, which is mentioned in the report itself,"
Nalbandyan told the news conference.

The European Parliament adopted resolution number 2216 on 20 May
demanding the "withdrawal of Armenian forces from all occupied
territories of Azerbaijan, accompanied by deployment of international
forces, to be organized in accordance with the UN Charter in order to
provide the necessary security guarantees during the period of
transition. This will ensure the security of the population of
Nagorno-Karabakh and allow the displaced persons to return to their
homes", the official website of the European Parliament said on 20

The Armenian foreign minister said the resolution contradicted the
EU’s position on the issue: "There is an obvious mess of the
formulations, and I believe one of the reasons is that the author of
the report had never been to Karabakh and to the region at the time of
writing that report and had not consulted with even the representative
of France, which is an EU member and a co-chair in the OSCE Minsk
Group. For this reason some of these provisions contradict the EU’s
position as well. This position [EU’s position] was expressed on
numerous occasions; the EU’s position was expressed in a quite
extensive statement in December 2009 in Athens and this position is
also fully in accordance with Armenia’s position", Nalbandyan said at
the news conference.

Armenia’s GDP Grows 7.2% To AMD 77.6 Billion In Jan-Apr 2010


May 20, 2010

YEREVAN, May 20. /ARKA/. Armenia’s GDP grew 7.2% in Jan-Apr 2010,
compared with the same period a year before, National Statistical
Service of Armenia reports.

According to the statistical report, Armenia had 9.7% economic decline
in Jan-Apr 2010.

GDP amounted to AMD 777.6 billion in Jan-Apr and was 5.9% less in
April than in March.

In the 2010 state budget, GDP growth is planned at 1.2%.

($1 = AMD 384.48).

Tigran Sargsyan: Armenia Is Interested In Partnership In EurAsEC


MAY 21, 2010

The 26th session of the EurAsEC opened today in
St. Petersburg. Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and the
delegation headed by him also participated in the event. Armenia has
a status of an observer in the institution.

The delegation consists of head of the government’s staff David
Sargsyan, Finance Minister Tigran Davtyan, Deputy Foreign Minister
Shavarsh Kocharyan, Deputy Economy Minister Mushegh Tumasyan and
other officials.

After the narrow meeting of the heads of governments the meeting
continued in "1+2+4" format. Members of the organization are Russia,
Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, observers
are Armenia, Moldova, Ukraine.

Among the core issues discussed is the economic cooperation block. The
heads of executive bodies discussed the decision on prior events of
implementation of cooperation concept in the energy sphere.

At the end of the session the heads of governments discussed the
results of the meeting presenting each his own vision of cooperation
in the establishment.

Armenian Prime Minister pointed out that though Armenia has a status
of an observer but the country follows the process of development of
the organization and is interested in cooperation.

"We are interested in the process of partnership with EurAsEC and
boosting of ties as in this establishment are our partners and we are
implementing partnership within the framework of the CSTO. We are quite
effectively working in the commissions of the establishment and in task
groups including in the anti-crisis foundation and high technology
center. Armenia is coming fourth with initiatives which interest our
partners and we are sure that these initiatives will contribute to
the increase of the level of the establishment," Armenian PM said.

"In the anti-crisis fund we have presented a new project on
construction of "North-South" railway route. It is a great program for
the implementation of which Armenia’s government is ready to provide
guarantees," Tigran Sargsyan said. He expressed assurance that the
program will be of great interest.

The meeting was wrapped up by the working dinner served by Vladimir

SCPEC Imposes A Second Fine On Alex Grig For Not Providing Informati


By a May 19 ruling the State Commission for Protection of Economic
Competition of the Republic of Armenia decided to impose a 500,000
AMD fine on three local Armenian companies for not providing the
Commission with the required information in time or for providing it
with incomplete information.

These companies are Etalon Trade, Arshensan and Alex Grig, which are
importing sugar and butter inter alia.

The Commission had monitored the sugar and butter market and had
required the above-mentioned companies to provide it with certain
information as to the price, quantity of imports. But the latter had
failed to do so.

The Commission required those three companies to provide the
information required in a 10-day period.

By another ruling earlier today the Commission imposed the heaviest
fine under the law (2.5b AMD) on Alex Grig for dishonest competition
in the local market of alcoholic drinks.

An Investigative Report:The Woodrow Wilson Center Desecratesits Name

David Boyajian

Ma y 8th, 2010

Woodrow Wilson, the 28th American president, is looking down in horror
at what the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (WWC; is doing in his name.

Most Americans are not aware of the DC-based organization, or that
their taxes comprise one-third of its multi-million dollar annual

The WWC was created by Congress in 1968 through the Woodrow Wilson
Memorial Act to commemorate the late president’s "ideals and concerns"
and memorialize "his accomplishments."

The WWC has in several ways, however, violated its Congressional

The WWC itself claims that it "takes seriously his [Wilson’s] views."

In fact, it has knowingly disregarded many of his views.

And while it professes "to take a historical perspective," the WWC
often closes its eyes to history.

Case in point: In mid-June of this year, the WWC plans to travel to
Turkey to bestow its coveted Woodrow Wilson Award for Public Service
on Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

Curiously, the WWC won’t provide this writer with a press release
about it. We know about the award only from the Turkish media and a
call to the WWC’s communications chief.


The WWC’s President/Director, former Congressman Lee Hamilton (he
recently announced he would be leaving the organization), says that
Davutoglu "personifies the attributes we seek to honor at the Woodrow
Wilson Center" and has "catalyzed" Turkish policy.

It is appalling that the WWC would honor a top official of a country
that in so many ways is a major human rights violator. Moreover,
Davutoglu’s own record – including his much- ballyhooed "zero problems
with neighbors" policy – is undistinguished.

But even more to the point, Davutoglu’s policies are the very
antithesis of Woodrow Wilson’s "ideals and concerns."


Let us start with Davutoglu’s eruption against America due to a
US House committee’s approval in March of a resolution (Res. 252)
that reaffirmed the factuality of, and historic US interest in,
the Armenian genocide of 1915-23 committed by Turkey.

Turkey immediately recalled its ambassador. Davutoglu then announced
that the House committee vote was an insult to his country’s "honour,"
as if Turkey’s continuing cover-up of genocide is somehow honorable. A
top official of Turkey’s ruling AK Party threatened the US with
"consequences." Turkey’s relationship with America, he warned, "would
be downgraded at every level … from Afghanistan to Pakistan to Iraq
to the Middle East process … there would be a major disruption."

These were not just nasty overreactions by Turkey. They were also
nonsensical. The US has, after all, reaffirmed the Armenian genocide as
"genocide" at least five times: three resolutions passed by the full
House (1975, 1984, and 1996); an official proclamation (No. 4838) by
President Reagan (1981); and a US legal filing with the International
Court of Justice (1951).


Davutoglu threw the same sort of tantrum a week later – withdrawing
his ambassador and making threats – when the Swedish Parliament
recognized the Armenian and Pontic Greek genocides.

Turkey has thrown similar fits when some 20 other countries, the
European Parliament, a UN sub-commission, the Vatican, and others
recognized the Armenian genocide.

No other alleged "ally" threatens the US as frequently and consistently
as does Turkey.

Thus, far from "catalyzing" Turkey’s policies, the foreign minister is
carrying on his government’s tradition of threats and genocide denial.

If such behavior "personifies the attributes" that the WWC "seeks to
honor," the Center’s standards must be low indeed.


"Turkey will not allow anyone else to evaluate its history," Davutoglu
blustered after the House committee and Swedish Parliament votes.

He seems unaware that countries constantly evaluate other countries’
histories. Davutoglu evidently thinks that Turkey should be uniquely
exempt from the judgments of others.

Davutoglu also seems blissfully unaware that the United Nations,
the US, and many other nations and international organizations have
condemned and continue to condemn various countries’ past (and present)
crimes such as the Holocaust, genocides, bloody revolutions, and crimes
against humanity. These include the genocide now taking place in Sudan.

Not surprisingly, Turkey and Davutoglu have a horrendous record
regarding Sudan.


Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir was invited to visit Turkey two years
ago while he was under indictment by the International Criminal Court
(ICC) for "war crimes and crimes against humanity."

Human rights groups, such as Human Rights Watch, blasted Turkey for
inviting the Sudanese dictator. Turkey defiantly proceeded to welcome
al-Bashir with a red carpet, an honor guard, and a 21-gun salute.

True to Turkey’s tradition of genocide denial, President Abdullah
Gul downplayed the Sudanese mass killings, attributing them solely to
"politics … poverty and environmental conditions."

Then last year, after Davutoglu’s appointment, the Turkish government
once again invited al-Bashir, the target of an ICC international
arrest warrant. Only after a huge international outcry was the visit
eventually canceled. Davutoglu, like his country, has a blind spot
when it comes to genocides.

In the meantime, of course, Davutoglu’s Turkey has been busy accusing
other countries – notably China and Israel – of genocide. The hypocrisy
is incredible. Should not Turkey first acknowledge its own genocides
against not only Armenians but also Assyrians, Greeks, and Kurds?

Now we know why some have dubbed Turkey and Sudan the "axis of

But Davutoglu and Turkey’s failures involve much more than tantrums,
threats, genocide, and hypocrisy.


Despite Turkey’s so-called "zero problems with neighbors" policy,
Davutoglu has largely continued, not "catalyzed," his country’s
failed policies.

For example, there is no end in sight to Turkey’s 36-year long military
occupation of northern Cyprus. "Zero problems with neighbors"?

Turkey’s alleged rapprochement last year with Armenia, which Turkey
has blockaded since 1993, also disproves the WWC’s assertions about
Davutoglu. When he negotiated and signed a set of controversial
protocols with Armenia last year, Turkey said that these would open
a new chapter with its eastern neighbor.

Both countries’ parliaments were then supposed to quickly ratify
the protocols.

Though many Armenians believe that parts of the protocols are contrary
to Armenia’s interests, the Armenian Parliament has been ready to
ratify them.

Davutoglu, however, quickly reverted to his government’s old
precondition: Turkey would neither ratify the protocols nor open
its border with Armenia unless Armenians concluded an agreement with
Azerbaijan regarding Karabagh, the Armenian region that Stalin handed
to Soviet Azerbaijan and which declared independence from Azerbaijan
in 1991.

Turkey’s backpedaling was condemned by the parties that mediated the
protocols – the US, Russia, and Switzerland – as well as the European
Union. Due to Davutoglu’s duplicity, the protocols have stalled and
may die. "Zero problems with neighbors"?

And regardless of one’s views on American policy towards Iran and
Israel, it is known that Turkey’s overheated, undiplomatic rhetoric
is designed primarily to please a Muslim audience at home and in the
Middle East. Turkey’s intemperate language has simply poured oil on
fires and complicated American efforts in the region.

Turkey’s Kurdish problems, both within the country and across the
border in Iraq, remain unsolved. Raids into northern Iraq by Turkish
troops are not a solution.

Even Turkey’s offers to "mediate" regional disputes look rather
contrived given that Turkey has not faced many of its own problems
with neighbors.

"Zero problems with neighbors" is a hollow catchphrase. A more
accurate name would be Turkey’s longstanding "zero Armenians as
neighbors" policy.

Aside, perhaps, from improved Turkish relations with Syria, and a
lot of braggadocio and spin, Davutoglu has "catalyzed" essentially
nothing for the better. He is surely grateful, though, to Lee Hamilton
and the WWC for implying otherwise.

Let us now examine President Woodrow Wilson’s record to see how the
WWC has besmirched his name and violated its Congressional mandate.


President Wilson advocated the right to self-determination of all the
nations, particularly Armenia, that suffered under Turkey’s corrupt,
violent yoke.

His and America’s support for Armenians – politically, financially,
and verbally – was immense and is well-documented. Yet the WWC chooses
to desecrate that record by honoring a Turkish official who denies the
Armenian genocide, threatens the American people, plays games with the
protocols it signed with Armenia, and continues to blockade Armenia.

Wilson enunciated his famous Fourteen Points, based on a just peace,
in 1918, before the end of WW I. Point Twelve left no room for doubt:
The non-Turkish "nationalities which are now under Turkish rule should
be assured an undoubted security of life and an absolutely unmolested
opportunity of autonomous development." He was referring to Armenians,
Arabs, Assyrians, Greeks, Kurds, and others.

Unlike the proposed award to Davutoglu, Wilson’s was well-deserved:
He received the Nobel Peace Prize of 1919 because of his Fourteen
Points and his advocacy of the League of Nations.

Reporting to Wilson during the genocide was his good friend and
ambassador to Turkey, Henry Morgenthau, Sr. The ambassador cabled
Washington in 1915 that Turkey was engaged in a "campaign of race
extermination" against Armenians. The American Embassy served as a
channel for Armenian massacre reports arriving from various parts of
the Turkish empire. US Consul Leslie A. Davis, who actually witnessed
the genocide in the interior, wrote, "I do not believe there has ever
been a massacre in the history of the world so general and thorough."

At Wilson’s direction, Morgenthau gave to Turkish leaders the
British-French-Russian declaration of 1915 that dealt specifically
with the Armenian mass murders. "All members of the Ottoman Government
and those of its agents who are implicated in such massacres," read
the declaration, will be held "personally responsible" for "the new
crimes of Turkey."

By proposing to honor a genocide denier, the WWC’s Lee Hamilton is
implying that Ambassador Morgenthau and American consuls were liars.

Referring to Turkey’s crimes against humanity, Wilson spoke these
words in Salt Lake City a year after WW I: "Armenia is to be redeemed
so that at last this great people, struggling through this night of
terror … are now given a promise of safety, a promise of justice."


In the spring of 1920, under the terms of the Treaty of Sèvres,
the European Allies asked Wilson to arbitrate the boundary between
Turkey and Armenia within the four Armenian provinces of "Erzerum,
Trebizond, Van, and Bitlis." Wilson agreed. He had already sent 50
American researchers to survey the people and land.

In November, the president delivered the US decision: Armenia would
include more than 40,000 square miles within those four provinces and
a Black Sea coastline. Europe also asked America to accept a mandate
over Armenia – that is, physical protection from Turkey while Armenians
got back on their feet.

Though Congress, in a post-war isolationist mood, eventually declined
his appeal for the Armenian mandate, Wilson’s written request noted
that "the hearings conducted by the subcommittee of the Senate
Committee on Foreign Relations have clearly established the truth of
the reported massacres and other atrocities from which the Armenian
people have suffered."

The Senate report, Wilson went on, embodied his "own convictions and
feelings with regard to Armenia and its people." Americans, he said,
"have made the cause of Armenia their own" and had responded with
"extraordinary spontaneity and sincerity." These were understatements.

Turkey signed the Treaty of Sèvres but later repudiated it.

Incidentally, had Turkey fulfilled its obligations under Sèvres and
Wilson’s binding arbitration, much of the Kurdish issue would have
been resolved 90 years ago. The treaty stipulated an autonomous
Kurdish zone – just below the Armenian provinces – in southeastern
Turkey and, conditionally, in northern Iraq that may eventually have
become independent.

Under Turkish and Soviet attack, in December of 1920 independent
Armenia was forcibly Sovietized, cut to a fraction of its size,
and became landlocked. The Armenian provinces remain under Turkish
occupation to this day, while Turkey blockades what remains of Armenia.


The Woodrow Wilson Memorial Act of 1968 was unambiguous: The WWC
was meant to express the 28th president’s "ideals and concerns"
and memorialize "his accomplishments."

If it proceeds with its award to Davutoglu, the WWC will be reaffirming
its disregard for Wilson’s "ideals and concerns" regarding the
genocide, America’s support for Armenians, and liberating their land
from Turkish rule. Similarly, Wilson’s "accomplishments" – securing aid
for Armenian survivors, US arbitration of Armenia’s boundaries under
the Sèvres Treaty, and more – are being ignored and mocked by the WWC.

The WWC is insulting Armenian Americans and all those who survived
the Turkish nightmare.

If Lee Hamilton’s own claim that WWC takes "a historical perspective"
were true, it would not honor a man – and by extension the Turkish
government – who unashamedly negate the historical record.

Is the Wilson Center seeking to discredit the Treaty of Sèvres on
its 90th anniversary by honoring Davutoglu?

MASSACRING HISTORY The WWC may try to claim that it has dealt
substantially and fairly with its namesake’s views and accomplishments
regarding the Armenian genocide.

As near as can be determined from a search of the WWC’s public records,
however, that claim would be false. This writer has found very little
about the genocide, and most of that is from a Turkish revisionist

Two years ago, the WWC’s Southeast Europe division did host a scholar
who discussed Turkish policy and the Armenian genocide. And twenty-four
years ago, the WWC’s Wilson Quarterly had a one-page piece about an
article published elsewhere that discussed the genocide.

In contrast, four years ago, the Wilson Quarterly published a
sycophantic review praising a widely criticized book by a notorious
genocide denier. And two years back, a former US State Department
official who dealt with Turkey (and is presently an advisor for the
Turkish Policy Quarterly) wrote a mere two sentences about the Sèvres
Treaty – solely from the Turkish perspective – in a WWC-sponsored paper
about Turkey. The Wilson Center’s website contains a nine-year old
article written by a former US Army officer who denies the genocide.

This is a disgraceful record.

A year ago, the editors of the journal Genocide Studies and Prevention
initiated a symposium that critiqued the report of the US-sponsored
Genocide Prevention Task Force (GPTF). While the symposium used the
WWC’s facilities, the WWC was not a cosponsor, reportedly took little
or no part, and thus cannot claim credit for it.

In any case, nothing can justify the Wilson Center’s proposed award
for Davutoglu.

The question begs to be asked: Does the WWC have any questionable
links to Turkey or Armenian genocide deniers?


A look at WWC’s funding sources reveals that it is up to its neck in
corporate cash, including Turkish-tainted cash.

One major corporation – Boeing – that is a member of the WWC’s
so-called WilsonAlliances wrote a letter to Congress asking it to
defeat the Armenian Genocide Resolution (Res. 252).

Two other WilsonAlliances members – BAE and Chevron – have reportedly
lobbied Congress to defeat the Armenian resolution.

Four WilsonAlliances members – Alcoa, Boeing, Bombardier, and Honeywell
– are dues-paying members of the Aerospace Industries Association
(AIA), which has asked President Obama and Congress to ensure that
Res. 252 "doesn’t go to the House floor for a vote." AIA refers to
the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians as merely "the events."

Six WilsonAlliances members – BAE, Bechtel, Boeing, Chevron, Coca
Cola, and Exxon-Mobil – are also dues paying members of the American
Turkish Council (ATC). The ATC calls itself a "business association."

Its membership includes over 100 major Turkish and American
corporations. Among its leadership team of some 100 Turks and
Americans, it is nearly impossible to find even one person who is
not a top corporate executive, former military officer, or former
government official. The ATC has long lobbied against Armenian
genocide resolutions. Former Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, chairman of
its Executive Committee, once told Congress that what happened to
Armenians is "widely disputed."

ATC member Lockheed-Martin Corp., which penned a letter opposing the
Armenian resolution, has also contributed money to the WWC.


DLA Piper is a gigantic, worldwide legal and corporate services firm
that has registered with the US government as a foreign agent for
Turkey. The firm is well-known for having lobbied against Armenian
Americans and is currently setting up an office in Istanbul.

Ignacio Sanchez is a lawyer employed by DLA Piper. He "represents
national and international clients on a broad range of issues
… before Congress" for his firm.

Sanchez also happens to sit on the Wilson Center’s Board of Trustees.

DLA Piper’s contract with Turkey states that its "services shall
include … preventing the introduction, debate and passage of
legislation and other U.S. government action that harms Turkey’s
interests and image."

DLA Piper has partially subcontracted its Turkish role to The
Livingston Group. Headed by former disgraced House Speaker Robert
Livingston, who denies the Armenian genocide and lobbies against
Armenian genocide resolutions, it has been a registered agent of

DLA Piper also has what it terms a "strategic alliance" with The Cohen
Group (TCG), headed by former Defense Secretary William Cohen. TCG
represents large corporations who do business with Turkey. It is an
ATC member, and two of its employees sit on the ATC Advisory Board.

TCG’s Vice President, Marc Grossman, was the US ambassador to Turkey
from 1994-97. Among former diplomats, he is probably Turkey’s biggest

He has opposed passage of Armenian genocide resolutions. A few years
ago, Grossman reportedly joined Ilhas Holding, a Turkish firm.

It is also known that whistleblower and former FBI translator Sibel
Edmonds has made very serious allegations about the ATC, Grossman,
and Turkey. These have not yet been adjudicated in a court of law.

And whom did the WWC recently select to be one of its "Public Policy
Scholars"? Marc Grossman.

The WWC seems to be quite fond of corporations (and their money),
lobbying firms, and people strongly affiliated with Turkey that in
many cases oppose acknowledgment of the Armenian genocide.

The above barely skims the surface of the Wilson Center’s cozy
financial relationships with huge corporations.


We must digress briefly for an example of how former government
officials work their way into genocide inquiries that are best left
to those more suitable.

Former Defense Secretary William Cohen (of the Turkish-affiliated TCG)
and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright chaired the Genocide
Prevention Task Force mentioned above.

As private citizens, Cohen and Albright opposed the Armenian Genocide
Resolution. Their appointment to the GPTF was thus justifiably
criticized as incompatible with its very purpose.

The GPTF was jointly convened by the Congressionally-funded,
so-called US Institute of Peace, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum,
and the American Academy of Diplomacy (AAD).

The latter is composed of former high-level US State Department
officials. AAD’s chairman is retired ambassador Thomas Pickering. He
was formerly a VP of Boeing, the same company that has beseeched
Congress not to pass the Armenian Genocide Resolution.

The GPTF’s final 147-page report (Preventing Genocide: a Blueprint
for US Policymakers) contained just two miniscule references to the
Armenian genocide. Sure enough, they used the terms "forced exile"
and "atrocities", not genocide. The report was also widely criticized
by scholars.

Incidentally, who sits on the AAD’s Board? If you guessed the
ubiquitous Marc Grossman of the Wilson Center and pro-Turkish TCG,
you’d be correct.

CORPORATE PERKS The WWC provides many benefits to corporations that
contribute money to its WilsonAlliances. For example, they receive
"complimentary use" of the WWC’s facilities, the Reagan Federal
Building, blocks from the White House. They also get "private
customized meetings with [WWC] staff and scholars to discuss policy
issues that are specific to your business interests."

Did WWC/Turkish-affiliated corporations use "private customized
meetings" to urge the WWC to honor Davutoglu, perhaps in expectation
that it would enhance their "business interests" with Turkey?

Did any WWC/Turkish-affiliated lobbying firm or person ask the WWC
to give Davutoglu an award?

We don’t know the answers to these questions. Only those corporations,
lobbyists, and other figures, together with Lee Hamilton and WWC
personnel, can answer them, preferably under oath.

In a phone message, Sharon Coleman McCarter, WWC Communications
Director, said that the Center is honoring the Turkish Foreign Minister
because of "public service to his country and the world."

Turkey, or some Turks, may like its foreign minister, but, as this
writer has shown, he has certainly done nothing to benefit "the world."

McCarter also claimed that Davutoglu "is in the Wilsonian tradition"
because, like Wilson, he has been in academia and government. If
you teach and then enter government service, you’re automatically
"Wilsonian" and thus a candidate for the WWC award? This is


Who have the nearly 150 previous WWC awardees been? Mostly Americans:
philanthropists, doctors, members of Congress, former diplomats,
architects, actors, and the like.

They range from James Baker, Dr. Denton Cooley, Betty Ford, Frank
Gehry, John Glenn, and Amb. Howard Leach to Janet Napolitano, Dolly
Parton, Gen. Colin Powell (and his wife), Andrew Lloyd Webber, and
Andrew Young.

There are also some foreign political honorees, such as former Indian
President A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, and some relatively non-controversial
figures from Brazil and South Korea.

The threatening, blustering, genocide-denying Davutoglu, from a
country with a wretched human rights record, would stand out in the
Wilson Center’s Public Service roster like a sore thumb.

It would be an insult to previous awardees.

For its Public Service Award, the WWC had its pick of thousands
of principled individuals from the US or elsewhere doing vital
humanitarian work, including the recognition and prevention of
genocide. Instead, the WWC has engaged in the worst kind of political
pandering by selecting Davutoglu.


The rot may go even higher, up to the WWC’s parent, the famed
Smithsonian Institution, three-quarters of whose annual $1
billion budget comes from taxpayers. It, too, is a member of the
genocide-denying American Turkish Council.

The Smithsonian is supposed to be respectful of America’s multi-ethnic
heritage and pay homage to our country’s history, part of which
is Wilson’s support of Armenians and condemnation of Turkey for
committing genocide. There is no good reason for the Smithsonian to be
a member of the ATC, which is primarily a lobby for Turkish-affiliated
corporations. It should withdraw from the ATC.

And what must the WWC do to return to its Wilsonian roots?


The WWC must abandon its plans to honor Davutoglu. Those who care
about Wilson’s legacy – members of Congress, ordinary Americans,
and those whose relatives were lost to Turkish genocidal acts –
must contact the WWC and insist on this.

Congress and the Attorney General must launch investigations into
possible conflicts of interest at the WWC, particularly regarding
its corporate and Turkish connections. The WWC director and staff
must testify under oath.

Wilson Center personnel, and those affiliated with it, particularly
scholars, must speak out publicly against pandering to corporations
and lobbying organizations.

Those whose business or personal interests may conflict with their
WWC role should resign.

The WWC must reject all tainted corporate cash.

Recognized genocide scholars should be invited to speak at the Wilson
Center and write in its Wilson Quarterly. The WWC should create a
principled program on genocide.

The WWC must establish a meaningful, ongoing dialogue with those
persons and their descendants who have been victimized by Turkey’s

The WWC must return to its Congressional mandate by truly rededicating
itself to Wilson’s "ideals, concerns, and accomplishments" and by
advocating against genocide and for the human rights and dignity of
all people.

# # #

*The author is an Armenian American freelance journalist. He recommends
that readers contact the following to protest the WWC’s proposed
award to Davutoglu, and the WWC’s overly close relationships
with Turkish-affiliated corporations, lobbying organizations,
and individuals:

Woodrow Wilson Center: ~U President/Director:
[email protected] ~U Executive VP:
[email protected] ~U Outreach VP:
[email protected] ~U Public Affairs:
[email protected] ~U Asst. to the Director:
[email protected] ~U Special Asst. to the Director:
[email protected]

Also: ~U Linda St.Thomas, Spokesperson, Smithsonian Institution:
[email protected] Assyrian American National Federation: ~U President
Adad Ashurseen: [email protected] ~U Executive Secretary Suzan Younan:
[email protected] ~U Treasurer Linda Boudaghian: [email protected]
~U Advisory Board Chair Wilson Baba: [email protected]

Congress: ~U Your US Senator:
~U Your US Congressman:

Erdogan Is Building A New Empire

Karine Ter-Sahakyan

May 18, 2010

Restoration of the Turkic Empire or establishment of a new one is
impossible with the existence of independent Armenia.

The shortcoming of an imperial thinking is that even over several
generations it remains a dominant way of thinking. Since 2003, with
the advent to power of the Islamist Justice and Development Party led
by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey has taken the path of reviving the
Ottoman Empire, and these are neither empty nor fine words. What was
done for the past 7 years is the direct evidence of it. The latest
was the package of constitutional reforms which, according to still
remaining Kemalists, aims to undermine the foundations of the secular
state, laid by Mustafa Kemal.

About a year ago we wrote about the attempts of Turkey to restore
osmanism and we proved to be near the truth. All actions of the
Erdogan government are aimed at the re-establishment of the Empire,
rather than at creating a regional power. This became much more
evident after the visit of President Dmitry Medvedev to Ankara,
during which Turkey achieved abrogation of the visa regime, creation
of favourable conditions for trade and a reasonable price for gas. The
Russian-Turkish rapprochement, which has come to be much spoken about,
is a misleading phenomenon: neither Russia nor Turkey will compromise
their interests in the name of "ephemeral" friendship. Besides, what
friendship can exist between old foes? The Russian Empire used to 3
enemies: the British, Ottoman and Hapsburg Empires. Almost nothing has
changed since then, except that Austria-Hungary and the British Empire
have sunk into oblivion. But Russia has held "special" relations with
the Ottoman Empire – war, armistice, war, once again a peace treaty,
and, finally, the World War I, after which the Ottoman Empire with
the help of the Bolshevik Russia was reborn into the Turkish Republic.

However, it is all history. Currently Erdogan is again building
an empire, and among the first countries that he’ll ‘swallow up’
are Georgia and Azerbaijan. Luckily for Turkey, she meets resistance
from neither of them. It won’t be inappropriate to remind here that
this process was initiated by Heydar Aliyev, who advanced the slogan
"One Nation, Two States". The rest was a matter of technique; simply
the Turkish presidents preceding Abdullah Gul professed Kemalism,
at least by word of mouth. The military elite strongly countered any
attempt of thorough islamization, but… The "Ergenekon" process
actually decapitated the army: the Justice and Development Party
learnt the lessons of the 80s quite well.

As for Azerbaijan and Georgia, unlike his father, Ilham Aliyev
is more susceptible to outside influence, and like any weak leader
prefers to be led by the hand. Moreover, he is looking for a mediator
to reconcile with the United States and believes that Turkey is most
suitable for it. However, Ankara has her own problems with Washington,
and, noticeably, she doesn’t feel like dealing with Aliyev’s intents.

As for Georgia, she is always ready to go under the patronage of any
state that will take care of her people. The whole history of Georgia
is a history of slavery and you can’t go against it. By the way,
for centuries the strongest were selected, but when a stronger state
appeared, the previous owners were easily sold. Unfortunately, there
is not and there cannot be anything new in the history of the region.

Let no one be caught at the efforts of Turkey to "help" Iran, an old
enemy. The same goes for Russia. Nevertheless, times have changed,
and now Ankara has taken a more "civilized" path: she opens research
centers, initiates student exchange programs. And all this is done for
the single purpose of training the world to the potential new empire
in the East. But Islam is a fairly strong argument in this issue –
we should bear in mind that the sultan carried the title of "Caliph of
the Faithful". But what response will this get in Iran, where people
are opposed to the tandem Baku-Ankara, and Turkey’s involvement in the
regulation of Iran’s nuclear program is perceived as a forced measure.

As for Europe, the position of EU is remarkably steady and unambiguous
in the issue of Turkey: there is no room for this Asian country in
Europe. Hardly is it possible that the personality of the President
of France or that of the German Chancellor matters; what matters is
the position of the state. However, when speaking about Germany, it
must be admitted that during the war the Germans were friends with the
Turks. Against Russia, of course. It appears that Erdogan’s joining
the EU now is not a necessity. Simply, the process is under its own
inertia, and from time to time information is tossed so as to say:
we are good, we build democracy, but you do not want us.

But restoration of the Turkic Empire or establishment of a new one
is impossible with the existence of independent Armenia. And it
was especially for neutralizing Armenia that the American project
"Armenian-Turkish relations" was launched. Thanks to God this project
was not implemented and hardly will it have continuation. So let’s
hope that things stand exactly this way and no otherwise.

Nevertheless, we must admit that the Armenian language and Armenia
are better studied in Turkey than the Turkish language and state
in Armenia. The same also goes for Russia. The point, probably,
is not the lack of funds but the lack of desire and want, as the
leaderships of both countries believe. Tomorrow the Russians can see
quite a different country on the site of the Russian Federation. And
what will the Armenians see?… Armenia may simply disappear. In 1914
population of the Ottoman Empire amounted to 33 million people, which
was believed to be quite a lot then. Now the population of Turkey is 70
million people and it is increasing annually to absorb 140 million of
the population of the Russian Federation in 50 years. The demographic
factor, especially in the Islamic world, has always worked faultlessly.

Armenian Parliament Adopts Defamation Bill


May 18, 2010 – 15:38 AMT 10:38 GMT

Armenian Parliament adopted a bill on defamation, in accordance with
public demands and media representatives’ suggestions.

The bill stipulates for abolishment of criminalization of insult and
defamation, PanARMENIAN.Net parliamentary correspondent reported.

The aggrieved party can bring defamation suits against the insulter,
to demand indemnification which carries a sentence of fine, disclaimer
or public apology.

The bill adopted will emerge as a law following presidential approval

International Museum Day Marked


The International Museum Day is a celebration that is held each
year on or about 18 May. Each year, the Advisory Committee of the
International Council of Museums (ICOM) defines a specific theme for
International Museum Day.

The theme for 2010 is "Museums for Social Harmony".

ICOM-Armenia will hold "cultural heritage available for everyone"
action to make the museums available for different disabled groups.