Take Legal Actions Against The Participants Of So-Called "Kirkuk 200

TAKE LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST THE PARTICIPANTS OF SO-CALLED "KIRKUK 2007" CONFERENCE
By Pir Aso Yarsani

Kurdish Media, UK
Jan 17 2007

Turkey’s various hostile interventions in the Iraqi government,
in general, and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) affairs,
in particular, must be immediately stopped and condemned in a joint
announcement by both KRG and the Iraqi government; otherwise Turkey
will continue to make fun of itself by insulting and humiliating
these legal bodies more and more.

If Turkey is not stopped now, its illegal actions will inevitably
lead to another bloody regional armed conflict. A conflict which
I guess before everything else will shrink Turkey to become as big
as Kosovo. That should indeed matter all Turkish fascists, I don’t
mind personally.

A Turkey once upon a time described by European scholars as ‘a mad
man of Europe’, has now become the mad cow of the Middle East which
must be either cured or isolated from the rest of the healthy world.

A country which historically was given chance after chance to become
a good example of diversity and coexistence of many distinctive folk
groups (that are mainly Kurds, Armenians and Turks) but chose to commit
two genocides; the first one caused 1.5 millions Armenians death,
and the second one thousands of thousands Kurdish death, burned
villages, displacement of ca a half million Kurds and currently a
well-designed psychological war aimed to target all Kurds wherever
they are now. However, Turks should now know better that Kurds is
an immortal nation and despite many hardships they are determined to
continue their struggles for a better world.

A world in which a Turk and a Kurd is treated equally, not like
today’s Turkey where Kurds are deprived from their entire cultural
and political human rights and unfortunately viewed as enemies. It is
evident that the Turkish politicians have miscalculated both regional
and international real political arenas. This notion of illogical
thinking should be Turkey’s first priority and not hosting "Kirkuk
2007" which is undoubtedly an Iraqi affair not Turkish.

Concerning the so-called "Turkmen National Front" which initially was
set up by the Turkish intelligent organization (MIT) to function as a
Turkish proxy inside the Southern Kurdistan, all Iraqi patriots should
be united to confront this mercenary group. The Iraqi people have
all national and international rights to conduct a set of effective
measurements to tackle this issue. What Iraqis can do are:

1) Bringing this issue to UN 2) Closing the Turkmen national front
offices and prohibiting them to contact Turkey 3) All Kurds inside and
outside Kirkuk should personally boycott any cultural and financial
affairs with those Turkmen who are worshiping Ataturk or Turkey
Finally, European Union along with all Turkish democratic forces, if
there is any at all, should immediately break their deadly silence and
demand from Turkey to behave like civilized countries and democracies.

66 New Cases of HIV Registered Last Year in Armenia

66 NEW CASES OF HIV REGISTERED LAST YEAR IN ARMENIA

Armenpress
Jan 17 2006

YEREVAN, JANUARY 17, ARMENPRESS: The latest data of Armenian health
authorities say since 1988 when the first case of AIDS was registered
in the country, the officially registered number of people with
HIV/AIDS by the end of December last year rose to 429.

Last year alone 66 news cases of HIV were registered. The bulk of HIV
carriers-76 percent, are men between 20-29. Also nine children with HIV
were registered. Most infection comes about through the intravenous
injection of drugs (52 percent) and through heterosexual contacts
(43 percent).

According to AIDS Prevention Center, 151 people, including 27 women
and five children, were diagnosed with AIDS, 46 last year. Since 1988
99 people, of whom 18 women and three children, have died of AIDS.

The economic crisis, unemployment, labor migration and the rapid
growth of HIV rates in the region contribute to the spread of HIV/AIDS
in Armenia. Other independent estimates put the overall number of
HIV/AIDS carriers at about 3,000 people.

RA Appeal Court Reduces Half A Year The Imprisonment Term Of "Zhaman

RA APPEAL COURT REDUCES HALF A YEAR THE IMPRISONMENT TERM OF "ZHAMANAK YEREVAN" EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

Noyan Tapan
Jan 15 2007

YEREVAN, JANUARY 15, NOYAN TAPAN. By the January 12 verdict of
the RA Appeal Court, Arman Babajanian, the editor-in-chief of the
"Zhamanak Yerevan" (Time Yerevan) newspaper was sentenced to 3 year
6 months term imprisonment. To recap, the Court of First Instance
of the Kentron and Nork-Marash communities of Yerevan sentenced
A.Babajanian, accused of avoiding military service by falsifying
documents, to 4-year imprisonment.

According to the verdict made public by Arshak Khachatrian, presiding
the session at the Appeal Court, June 26 of 2006 will be considered the
start of A.Babajanian’s punishment. Arrest chosen as the precautionary
measures towards the defendant was left unchanged.

To recap, the court session proceeded in A.Babajanian’s advocates
Zaruhi Postanjian’s and Hayk Alumian’s absence. The latters presented
mediation to the court with a request to postpone the session, taking
into consideration the circumstance that the interdepartment commission
discussing applications of the citizens not passing obligatory military
service with violation of the fixed order did not make any decision
yet concerning A.Babajanian’s application.

But the court, qualifying advocates’ absence as invalid, re-start
the session without their participation what became a reason that
A.Babajanian refused the right of without last word, first demanding
providing of his advocates’ presence, then refusing the latters
and demanding to allow him to involve new advocates in the case
examination. The court ignored the defendant’s demands as well,
and passed the sentence without his last word.

Communist Chief Advocates Closer Ties with Russia

COMMUNIST CHIEF ADVOCATES CLOSER TIES WITH RUSSIA

Armenpress
Jan 15 2007

YEREVAN, JANUARY 15, ARMENPRESS: The leader of the Armenian Communist
Party Ruben Tovmasian claimed today to have the largest army of
supporters, saying also it will not seek an alliance with other
political forces in order to contest the next parliamentary elections,
slated for May.

Speaking to a news conference Mr. Tovmasian said his party received
proposals of forming alliances from some opposition forces, but added,
" We need not to form alliances as our electorate will not betray us."

Mr. Tovmasian claimed that 530,000 pensioners, "who fought for the
Communist Party and continue to trust it, will give their ballots
to it."

"Our ultimate goal is to go to parliament and to present to the
Armenian nation our lofty ideas and give it a chance to make their
choice," he said.

The Communist chief said his party will struggle for making health and
education free and for nationalization of such industries as mining,
production of alcoholic drinks, bread and import of cigarettes.

The chief Communist then commended Russia’s drive to take control
of several strategic industry branches in Armenia as "Russia is the
only friendly country of Armenia and the only defender of Armenians’
interests in the whole world."

"I am not saying that Armenia must sacrifice its independence, but
we think that a union of all former Soviet republics should be made,
void of all previous mistakes," he concluded.

Sofia: Armenia Calls for Establishing Diplomatic Relations w/Turkey

Focus News, Bulgaria
Jan 13 2007

Armenia Calls for Establishing Diplomatic Relations with Turkey

13 January 2007 | 21:58 | FOCUS News Agency

Yerevan. Armenia called for establishing diplomatic relations with
Turkey without any preconditions, Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister
Arman Kirakosyan said, the Liberty Radio reported. The Armenian
diplomat spoke at an international conference devoted to the economic
and social consequences from opening the Armenian-Turkish border.
Kirakosyan added that since 1993, when Turkey closed its border with
Armenia, the trade between the two countries had been realized via
the territory of third countries and via air service.
`Armenia welcomes any initiatives for opening the Armenian-Turkish
border. At present the relations between Armenia and Turkey are
realized at the level of public organizations, not at a governmental
level’, Kirakosyan stressed.

Wave Of Accusations For "Insulting Turkishness" Reached Taner Akcam

WAVE OF ACCUSATIONS FOR "INSULTING TURKISHNESS" REACHED TANER AKCAM

PanARMENIAN.Net
10.01.2007 14:50 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkey has officially launched an investigation
against Taner Akcam, the first Turkish intellectual to recognize
the Armenian Genocide as such, thus ‘insulting Turkishness’, reports
The Armenian Reporter, referring to Turkish magazine The Radikal. The
Istanbul newspaper Radikal has reported that an official investigation
has been opened against University of Minnesota Akcam, who claims
that, the Armenian deportations of 1915 and following constituted
genocide. Radikal broke the story on January 9, 2007. In an October 6,
2006, newspaper column in the Turkish Armenian journal Agos, Akcam
criticized the prosecution of Agos managing editor Hrant Dink for
using the term `genocide,’ thereby `insulting Turkishness’ under the
notorious Article 301 of Turkey’s penal code.

Highlighting the term `genocide,’ Akcam declared himself an accessory
to the charges against Dink, and urged readers to join in Dink’s
support.

Akcam is the author of A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and
the Question of Turkish Responsibility, which has been widely and
positively reviewed in the United States, and has brought a great
deal of public attention lately to the author and the subject of the
Armenian Genocide.

Support Palestine’s Struggle

SUPPORT PALESTINE’S STRUGGLE

Washington Post
Jan 9 2007

Dear Mr. Ban Ki-moon,

First, allow me to congratulate you on your new post as
secretary-general of the United Nations. I am writing to you from
Syria, a country that co-founded the UN back in 1945. So determined
were the Syrians for the UN to succeed that we sent some of our finest
diplomats to its founding conference, and our late Prime Minister
Faris al-Khury even co-designed its emblem, the same one that is
printed on the UN Flag at your office desk, Mr. Moon. We really
wanted the UN to achieve its declared objectives because this meant
a better life for the Arabs in general, guaranteeing their right to
self-determination after centuries of colonial rule by the French,
the British, and before them, the Ottomans.

We do have serious reservations, however, at how the UN was
administered under your predecessors, and the outright bias it showed
towards both Israel and the United States. We will never forgive–or
forget–the UN for standing by and watching the US invade Iraq in
2003. Washington did not receive clearance from the UN but went on
with the war, caring little for the family of nations that assembled
in San Francisco in 1945 to make the world "safer for democracy." Mr.

Kofi Anan was both unable–and unwilling–to say no to the Americans.

And by no means has the world become "safer for democracy" after the
fiasco in Iraq.

Allow me to quote an open letter, written to your predecessor the late
Dag Hammarskjold when he visited Damascus in 1956. It was published
in a bygone Damascus periodical, called "al-Hadara" (Civilization)
and written by Dr. George Jabbour, a scholar, presidential advisor,
and current parliamentarian, who at the time, was a university student
in Damascus. Addressing Hammarskjold he said: "When you descend from
the airplane with a smile on your face, forgive us if no similar
smile is drawn on our faces." After all, we had welcomed the first
UN secretary-general Trygve Lie to Damascus and our late President
Hashim al-Atasi had decorated him with the Syrian Medal of Honor,
Excellence Class.

The man betrayed us and gave unconditional support for Israel. As
early as 1956, Jabbour wrote that the Arabs in general no longer have
faith in solutions that are imposed on them from an outside power. He
wrapped up saying: "When you leave, it is not a problem if you forget
our wounds and sorrows because we no longer believe in medications that
are not made out of our own hands." Fifty-one years later, Jabbour’s
words are still alarmingly true, although five secretary-generals have
rotated at the UN since 1956, including an Arab, Mr. Boutros Boutros
Ghali. One-by-one we welcomed them to the Middle East, and spilled
out our worries and agitations. And one-by-one we watched them leave,
forgetting both our "wounds and sorrows." We want you to be different
Mr. Moon.

Mr. Secretary-General, there is great injustice in the Middle East.

You started the year 2007 with a new job in New York. We started it
with a massive Israeli raid in Ramallah. Why is it that out of the
65 UN resolutions passed against Israel, not one has been implemented
since 1948? The first was UN Resolution 106 "condemning" Israel for its
raid into Gaza in 1955. The second was UN Resolution 111 "condemning"
Israel for a raid on Syria that "killed 56-people." Must we remind
the world that not a single resolution was ever passed against the
Palestinians. Allow me to make another historical parallel and
refer to an open letter sent by the late Reverend Martin Luther
King, Jr. from his prison cell in Birmingham, Alabama on April 16,
1963. It was in response to a statement made by eight white clergymen
from Alabama who argued that although injustices were taking place
against African-Americans, they should be solved in the courts not
on the streets of the United States. I do not see any difference
between the plight of Africa-Americans in the 1950s and 1960s, and
that of the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories. I will quote
passages from King’s letter, and allow you to play the mental exercise
of replacing the word "Negro" with the word "Palestinian." You will
find the similarities dangerously alarming.

King addressed the clergymen saying: "You warmly commended the
Birmingham police for keeping "order" and "preventing violence." I
doubt that you would have so warmly commended the police force if
you had seen its dogs sinking their teeth into unarmed, nonviolent
Negros. I doubt you would so quickly commend the policemen if you
were to observe their ugly and inhumane treatment of Negros here in
the city jail; if you were to watch them push and curse old Negro
women and young Negro girls." That, Mr. Moon, is what happens every
day in Palestine at checkpoints, in jails, and at border-crossings.

King adds:

For years now, I have heard the word ‘Wait!’ It rings in the ear of
every Negro with piercing familiarity. This ‘Wait’ has almost always
meant ‘Never!’ We must come to see…that justice too long delayed
is justice denied. It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking
place in Birmingham, but it is even more unfortunate that the city’s
white power structure left the Negro community with no alternative.

That is why the civil rights movement started, he explains, "we had
no alternative except to prepare for direct action, whereby we would
present our very bodies as a means of laying our case before the
conscience of the local and national community." That is also the case
with the Palestinians. Of course their demonstrations are violent–very
violent–unlike the case with King, who was inspired by Ghandi.

The question remains: have the Palestinians achieved anything for
their cause, seven years into the intifada? The answer is no. The
first intifada of the 1980s was by far more successful because it was
nonviolent indeed, symbolized only by small boys throwing stones at
tanks and troops from the IDF. That is why it attracted the world’s
attention–and sympathy, and led to Oslo. But these people are
desperate Mr. Moon. What else except despair would let someone like
Wafa Idris, a 28-year old paramedic with the Palestinian Red Crescent,
blow herself up in Jerusalem on January 28, 2002. She was the first
"woman martyr" of the intifada and inspired another young woman,
Ayat al-Akhras, an 18-year old girl, to kill herself by denoting
a bomb at a supermarket in Jerusalem on March 29, 2002. She killed
two Israelis, one being a 17-year old Israeli girl. She had been a
straight A student, who was going to college to study journalism. She
was engaged to be married in June 2002. When a 18-year old Palestinian
girl kills a 17-year Israeli girl–a conflict that both teens are not
responsible for, then the future itself is dying in the Middle East.

The world says that negotiations are the only solution to the
Arab-Israeli conflict. That is true. The Palestinians will be unable
to destroy Israel. That is a fact. But they can create a situation,
and here again I use the words of King, "that is crisis-packed that
it will inevitably open the door to negotiation."

He adds, "We know through painful experience that freedom is never
voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the
oppressed." The most beautiful part of King’s great letter is the
section I will quote at length, which is filled with parallels to
the plight of the Palestinians. He says:

Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging dark
of segregation to say, ‘Wait.’ But when you have seen vicious mobs
lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and
brothers at whim; when you have seen hate-filled policemen curse,
kick, and even kill your black brothers and sisters; when you see
the vast majority of your twenty million Negro brothers smothering
in a airtight cage of poverty in the midst of an affluent society;
when you suddenly find your tongue twisted and your speech stammering
as you seek to explain to your six-year old daughter why she can’t
go to the public amusement park that has just been advertised on
television, and see tears welling up in her eyes when she is told
that Funtown is closed to colored children, and see ominous clouds
of inferiority beginning to form in her little mental sky, and she
her beginning to distort her personality by developing an unconscious
bitterness towards white people, when you have concoct an answer for
a five-year-old son who is asking: "Daddy, why do white people treat
colored people so mean?"; when you are humiliated day and night by
signs reading "white" and "colored," when your first name becomes
"nigger" [in this case ‘Palestinian’], your middle name becomes "boy"
(however old you are)…and your wife and mother are never given the
respected title of "Mrs;" when you are harried by day and haunted by
night by the fact that you are a Negro, living constantly at tiptoe
stance, never quite knowing what to expect next, and are plagued by
inner fears and outer resentments…then you will understand why
we find it difficult to wait. I hope sirs, you can understand our
legitimate and unavoidable impatience.

Mr. Moon, over the past couple of years, the UN’s image has been
severely damaged in the Arab World. It has been perverted, distorted,
and tarnished –perhaps beyond repair — in the eyes of millions of
Arabs. The reasons can be found in Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine. Very
recently, over 1,000 Lebanese were killed in the summer war of 2006,
and the UN was unable to protect them. Nearly 60,000 Iraqis have died
since 2003. Over 4,300 Palestinians have been killed since 2000, and
the UN stands in similar paralysis. Also, 31,168 have been seriously
wounded while 4,170 homes have been demolished in the Occupied
Territories. The Occupied Territories currently suffer from 30-40%
unemployment, and in Gaza alone it is over 50%. When the intifada
broke out in 2000, the poverty rate was 21%, and by December 2002 it
had increased to 60%. In Gaza, poverty today is estimated at 80%. Due
to terrible conditions, food consumption in the Occupied Territories
has dropped by 25%, and half of the population currently lives off
United Nations aid. Malnutrition among infants is 22%, the highest in
the region, matched only in the Sahara Desert. Since September 29,
2000, a total of 869 Palestinian children have been killed by the
Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). As many as 20,000 Palestinian children
were injured. Over 1,500 suffered life-long disabilities.

Killing is reciprocal, of course, and the number of Israelis killed by
Palestinians during the same period is a total of 1,084 (840 soldiers,
settlers and civilians), including about 123 Israeli children. Nearly
2,500 Israelis children were injured. Their life and safety are — or
should — be dear to all of us, because they bear no responsibility
for this bloody Middle East conflict. Israeli officials, however,
continue to deny that the IDF targets Palestinian children. Amira
Dotan, a spokeswoman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, once told the
Doha-based al-Jazeera TV: "This sort of thing just doesn’t happen
in Israel." When asked to explain the death of Palestinian children
killed by the IDF since the outbreak of the uprising in 2000, she
said the deaths were "accidental, collateral but not deliberate. Yes,
we knew there were children, but we had to kill the terrorists." The
Israeli journalist Amira Hass once interviewed an Israeli soldier
who confessed that the IDF gives orders to kill Palestinian boys and
girls aged 12 and above. He told her: "Twelve and up, you are allowed
to shoot. That’s what they tell us."

This is the sad Middle East that you will inherit from Kofi Annan,
Mr. Moon. Every single secretary-general since Mr. Lie failed
at bringing law and order to this part of the world, due to our
conflict with Israel. We want you to be different; we need you to be
different. My generation, the third in the Arab-Israeli Conflict, is
tired of bloodshed. Although still in our 30s, we have seen many wars
in our life, starting with Lebanon in 1982, and ending with Lebanon
in 2006. We want justice for the Lebanese, freedom for Iraq, and peace
in the Holy Land. Our cause is just because for too many years we were
wronged by everybody: the Great Powers, Israel, and the United Nations.

Our cause is paralleled only by two other great injustices in the
20th century. One is that of the Armenian genocide under the Ottoman
Empire. The other is that of the Jews in the Holocaust. Both have
been compensated for their misery with states of their own. Left
alone are the Palestinians. The road to peace in the Middle East runs
through Jerusalem first, not Baghdad. Mixed feelings exist in the
Arab world toward Iraq. Some are in favor of the post-Saddam order
and American schemes, while others are overwhelmingly opposed. On the
issue of Palestine, there is more of a consensus among the 200 million
Arabs. The real problem of the Middle East, which the international
community fails to understand is not terrorism, or Osama Bin Laden,
or even Yasser Arafat, who for long was blamed for obstructing peace
with Israel. The real problem has to do with land and freedom for
the Palestinians. Sadly as I write these words the Palestinians are
behaving in a foolish and ignorant manner, killing each other off in
petty rivalries over power.

I beg you to forgive me for such a long and tedious letter. It
certainly has taken up much of your time. I am writing it, however,
while watching the news in Ramallah. And in wrapping up, I will again
quote Dr King, addressing the white clergymen in Alabama: "Never before
have I written so long a letter. I can assure you that it would have
been much shorter if I had been writing from a comfortable desk, but
what else can one do when he is alone in a narrow jail cell, other
than write long letters, think long thoughts and pray long prayers?"

Like Reverend King, the Palestinians have had long thoughts, and long
prayers indeed.

Wishing you a successful tenure at the UN.

Faithfully, Sami Moubayed

Sami Moubayed is a Syrian political analyst, journalist, and author.

Moubayed is the author of "Damascus Between Democracy and Dictatorship
(2000)" and "Steel & Silk: Men and Women Who Shaped Syria 1900-2000
(2006)." He has also authored a biography of Syria’s former President
Shukri al-Quwatli and currently teaches at the Faculty of International
Relations at al-Kalamoun University in Syria. In 2004, he created
Syrianhistory.com, the first and online museum of Syrian history. It
contains over 2,000 photographs, documents, and rare audiovisual
material on Syria during the years 1900-2000.

French Vote On Armenian Genocide Adds To Turkey’s Growing Anti-EU Se

FRENCH VOTE ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ADDS TO TURKEY’S GROWING ANTI-EU SENTIMENT
By Jon Gorvett

Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, DC
December 2006, pages 30-31

WITH THE FRENCH parliament passing in early October a resolution to
make denial of the Armenian genocide a crime, the issue of 1915 once
again was buried beneath a mass of knee-jerk responses in Turkey.

Protests were held, tricoleur flags were burned. Calls for a boycott
of French goods were wheeled out of the nationalist garage, where they
had been gathering dust since 2001-the last time the French parliament
had intervened in this dispute-and plenty of brave speeches were made.

Yet while the motion in Paris may have been a storm in an electoral
teacup likely to be quashed by more sober heads in the Senate and
the Presidency-just as it was back in 2001-this time it may not be
a case of plus ca change, plus ca la meme chose.

This is because, nowadays, support in Turkey for the European
Union-of which France is such an important symbol-has never been more
dismal. Illustrative of this was the fact that the resolution was
passed just as Turkey was about to be on the receiving end of another
annual European Commission report on its progress in EU membership
talks. Widespread leaks, and a condemnatory version of the report
from the European Parliament, had left little doubt in Turkey that
this year’s end-of-term grade would have a definite "could do better"
ring to it.

Thus the French vote added to a growing feeling on the Turkish
street that the EU spends all of its time attacking Turkey rather
than helping it.

Some in Istanbul and Ankara also pointed to the bill as illustrative of
a perceived double standard in European attitudes toward free speech.

Only a few weeks before the French vote, Europe had condemned Turkey
for putting on trial one of its most respected authors, Elif Safak.

She had been accused of "insulting Turkishness" under the controversial
Article 30 of the revised Turkish criminal code-the same article used
unsuccessfully last December to try to prosecute recent Nobel Prize
winner Orhan Pamuk.

At a hearing attended by many European Union representatives anxious
to establish their free expression credentials, the Safak case also was
dismissed. But, some columnists asked, how come the Europeans condemned
Turkey for gagging free speech under Article 30 while at the same
time they were busy gagging free speech over the Armenian genocide?

The effect of the French parliament’s decision, therefore, was to
create another sense of grievance in Turkey against the Europeans.

This also plays to a central part of the Turkish national
narrative-that of the persecuted Turks, forced back into Anatolia
via massive bouts of ethnic cleansing in the Balkans, the Middle East
and the Caucasus, as the Ottoman Empire collapsed in the later 19th
and early 20th centuries.

Indeed, in this narrative, which continues to be spread at school
and beyond in Turkey, the Armenians themselves come as essentially
the last straw. Even in Anatolia, the nationalists say, they wanted
to push us out-"they," in this case, being the Armenians, erstwhile
citizens of the same Ottoman Empire, who lived in Anatolia and are
then portrayed as fifth columnists of the Europeans and the Russians.

This allows the nationalists to then claim that it was the Turks,
not the Armenians, who were the victims in 1915.

Challenging this view not only has long been highly dangerous for
Turks, but has only recently been open to debate at all. Whether the
French parliament’s effective closing of the issue to discussion is
at all useful in encouraging openness elsewhere remains to be seen,
but the French vote was largely seen as a setback by those in Turkey
trying to bring the events of 1915 out into the open.

At the same time, it also clearly is a setback for the pro-EU camp in
Ankara, which recently has been under fairly constant shellfire over
foreign policy in particular, and over the perennial Kurdish issue
as well. Joining the barrage with its heavy artillery was the Turkish
military, which launched a series of attacks on perceived concessions
to the European Union over the nation’s fundamental interests.

The first salvo came at the end of September from the head of the navy,
Admiral Yener Karahanoglu, who said that Turkey would never make the
concessions being demanded of it on the path to membership.

These were widely seen as being over Cyprus-where Turkey is being
asked to open its ports and airports to the vessels of EU-member
Cyprus, as represented by the Greek Cypriot government.

Indeed, the Cyprus issue duly arose again, like Banquo’s ghost, to
rattle its chains over the annual membership accession talks between
Turkey and the EU in October. EU Enlargement Commissioner Oli Rehn
warned that unless Turkey made a move on opening its ports, a "last
window of opportunity on the Cyprus issue in the coming weeks or
months for a very long time, perhaps for years" might close.

The other foreign policy issue over which the EU is pushing Turkey is
Armenia, with which Turkey is expected to normalize relations. Since
the Azerbaijan-Armenian conflict in the early 1990s over Nagorno
Karabakh, Turkey has closed its land frontier with Armenia and will
not reopen it until there is a settlement between Baku and Yerevan.

Admiral Karahanoglu’s words were then backed up by the head of the
army, Gen. Ilker Basbug, who warned of "intentional, patient and
systematic attempts" to undermine the achievements of the secular
Turkish Republic. This was interpreted as a widening of the attack
to target the Turkish government, which with its Islamist past has
long been held in deep suspicion by the generals.

Finally, the bunker buster itself was dropped by Gen. Yasar Buyukanit,
the new chief of the General Staff and thereby Turkey’s topmost
military official, when he spoke out to accuse the EU of having
"a hidden agenda" for Turkey.

Given that the governing Justice and Development Party (AKP) comes from
an Islamist tradition that also has long been hostile to the EU-indeed,
it was one of the great achievements of liberals within the AKP to
have turned this around after the "soft coup" back in 1997-support for
"concessions" has never been high among Turkey’s politicians either.

So, with such a basis of mistrust at the highest levels of both
military and government-and a bureaucracy that has a long history
of opposition to the kind of reforms EU membership would entail-it
is no surprise to find that support in society as a whole for EU
membership has plummeted. Recent opinion polls suggest around half
the population support membership. Even five years ago, the figure
was nearer 80 percent.

Nor is Turkey immune to broader global polarizations that have been
underway in recent years. The U.S. also is massively more unpopular
in Turkey now than it was before the "War on Terror." As a Muslim
country, Turkey feels the pull of the widespread condemnation of
Western actions found elsewhere in the Islamic world.

Given such circumstances, the path toward EU membership has been
growing thornier, even as it has seemed to be getting clearer. This
contradiction is evidence of the complexity of Turkish attitudes toward
Europe-and vice versa-while also perhaps serving as cautionary tale
to those who see the world in simpler terms.

Jon Gorvett is a free-lance journalist based in Istanbul.

2006/0612030.html

http://www.wrmea.com/archives/December_

Exhibition Of Photographs Under Title "In Battlefields Of Two World

EXHIBITION OF PHOTOGRAPHS UNDER TITLE "IN BATTLEFIELDS OF TWO WORLD WARS" TO BE ORGANIZED WITHIN FRAMEWORK OF YEAR OF ARMENIA IN FRANCE

Noyan Tapan
Jan 08 2007

YEREVAN, JANUARY 8, NOYAN TAPAN. Exhibition of photographs under the
title "In the Battlefields of Two World Wars" will be organized in
spring within the framework of Year of Armenia in France. Noyan Tapan
correspondent was informed about it by Amatuni Virabian, Director of
Armenian National Archives.

In his words, photographs of Armenian legion fighting as part of
the French army during the World War I, as well as Armenian partisan
regiment formed in 1944-45 in France kept at Armenian National Archives
will be shown. In the words of the Director of Armenian National
Archives, Armenian fighters making 98% of the regiment were taken
prisoners by Germans and moved to France during the Patriotic War.