ASP Book Presentation-Vahan Tekeyan-September 19

Armenian Studies Program, CSU Fresno
Barlow Der Mugrdechian, Coordinator
5245 N. Backer Ave. PB4
Fresno CA 93740-8001
ASP Office: 559-278-2669
FAX: 559-278-2129

Visit the ASP Website:

Book Presentation-`Vahan Tekeyan: Selected Poems’ (English and Armenian)
`Vahan Tekeyan-Hadendir’ (Armenian)
with guests Edmond Azadian, Dr. Arpi Sarafian, and Tamar Hovhannisyan

The Armenian Studies Program is presenting two new books about famed
Armenian poet Vahan Tekeyan (1878-1945) at a special event to be held
at 7:30PM on Friday, September 19, in the University Business Center,
Alice Peters Auditorium, Room 191, on the Fresno State campus.

The lecture is the second in the Fall Lecture Series of the Armenian
Studies Program and is co-sponsored by the Tekeyan Cultural
Association of Fresno. The Lecture Series is supported by the Leon
S. Peters Foundation.

Author and literary critic Edmond Azadian, editor of the newly
released =80=9CVahan Tekeyan: Selected Poems,’ will speak about the
significance of the volume. `Vahan Tekeyan’ was published as volume 5
in the Armenian Series, under the general editorship of Prof. Barlow
Der Mugrdechian. The Armenian Series part of the The Press at
California State University, Fresno.

At the presentation, Tamar Hovhannisyan of Carmel will discuss a
second book, `Vahan Tekeyan-Hadendir’ (in Armenian), also edited by
Edmond Azadian.

Guest speaker Dr. Arpi Sarafian (California State University, Los
Angeles) will speak about Vahan Tekeyan’s poetry.

Edmond Azadian has had a long career in journalism, as editor of Arev
newspaper in Cairo, and has worked with Baikar Armenian Daily and the
Armenian Mirror-Spectator . From 1972-2010 he served as the Director
of the Armenian Affairs Department at the Alex and Marie Manoogian
Foundation in Detroit, Michigan. He is the author of numerous books
including History on the Move and Portraits and Profiles .

The lecture is free and open to the public. Free public parking is
available after 7:00PM at Fresno State Lots P5 and P6, near the
University Business Center.

For more information about the lecture please contact the Armenian
Studies Program at 278-2669, or visit our website at

http://www.fresnostate.edu/artshum/armenianstudies/
www.fresnostate.edu/armenianstudies.

EU to provide EURO 170 million to Armenia for developing private sec

EU to provide ?¬170 million to Armenia for developing private sector
and implementing reforms

YEREVAN, September 8. /ARKA/. The European Union will provide ?¬140 to
170 million to Armenia over a period between 2014 and 2017 for
development of the private sector and implementation of public
administration and justice reforms, panorama.am reports.

On Monday, the European Commission announced a decision to provide EU
funding to the partners in the EU Neighbourhood in the coming years.

This package includes programs for Algeria, Armenia, AzerbaØ£¯jan,
Belarus, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia. The total amount
of these programs is over ?¬5.5 billion.

The priorities of the financing have been decided in a close
cooperation with authorities, civil society representatives and
concerned parties in each of the partner countries. –0—-

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/eu_to_provide_170_million_to_armenia_for_developing_private_sector_and_implementing_reforms/#sthash.rj7tCySZ.dpuf

Baku’s Position on Karabakh Will Weaken by 2019-20

Baku’s Position on Karabakh Will Weaken by 2019-20

3/9/2014 – 17:00

Petrostrategies, a French consultancy and think tank, published an
article on the recent Armenian-Azerbaijani escalation in its magazine,
“World Energy Weekly.” The authors of the article highlight the
fragility of oil and gas pipelines stretching from Azerbaijan to
Europe. They also stress that Baku will be forced to resolve the
Nagorno-Karabakh problem one way or another by 2019-20 given the fact
that its net hydrocarbon revenues are going to continue to fall and
its capacity to purchase arms will also dwindle.

At the beginning of August, a 6-day micro-war took place between
Azerbaijan and Armenia, just a stone’s throw from the Southern
Corridor that is used to export 37 million tons/annum of Azeri oil and
6 bcm/annum of Azeri gas. The event went unnoticed by the mainstream
press. The latter was more preoccupied by the (much bigger) wars that
are raging in Ukraine, Iraq, Libya and Syria. Yet it does highlight
the fragility of this Corridor, which is supposed to contribute to
Europe’s energy security, and the implementation of which occupied the
efforts of western governments for almost a quarter of a century. This
is the second time in six years that hostilities have broken out in
the vicinity of these pipelines. The first of these was the war
between Russian and Georgia, in August 2008. This summer’s micro-war
was not as long and bloody as the Russia-Georgia conflict. But it does
contain the seeds of a possible future larger-scale clash breaking out
in the medium term between Armenia and Azerbaijan if the necessary
steps to prevent it are not taken. And if war does break out, it is
almost certain that the pipelines of the Southern Corridor will not be
spared this time around.

The origin of the Armenian-Azeri conflict goes back to 1921. At the
time, within the framework of Stalin’s policy of mixing nationalities
in the Caucasus, the Armenian region of Nagorno-Karabakh was
incorporated into Soviet Azerbaijan. In 1998, taking full advantage of
Gorbachev’s Perestroika, Nagorno-Karabakh sought to exercise its right
to self-determination. Baku refused. The full-on war that was sparked
after the collapse of the USSR in 1991 led to the defeat of
Azerbaijan. The ceasefire agreement that was concluded in May 1994 has
not always been respected, but it had never been so badly violated as
it was this summer. At the end of July and beginning of August 2014
several thousand infractions were recorded. From August 1 to 6,
between 20 and 50 deaths (according to sources) were registered. On
August 7, the announcement of a mediation by Vladimir Putin eased the
intensity of the military clash. But on the same day, the Azeri
President, Ilham Aliyev posted nearly 60 messages on Twitter in which
he notably stated: “The war is not over. Only the first stage of it
is. But the second stage may start soon”. The day before, he had told
his soldiers: “The fascist leadership, the military junta” is leading
“an Armenian state [that] was created on the historical Azerbaijani
lands” and “we, Azerbaijanis must and will return to these lands”,
including the capital city, Yerevan, which he described as the ancient
Azeri (kingdom of) “Irevan khanate”.

The meetings held between the Armenian and Azeri Presidents, in Sochi,
between August 8 and 10, under the auspices of Putin, should in
principle lead to a resumption of negotiations aimed at finding a
political solution to the conflict. But nothing guarantees a happy
outcome of these talks. Azerbaijan is demanding the re-establishment
of its “territorial integrity”. The Armenians answer back that
historically, Nagorno-Karabakh has never been part of an independent
Azerbaijan. Strengthened by the huge purchases of arms it has carried
out in recent years, notably from Russia, Azerbaijan claims its can
destroy any given target in Armenia and it states that “the very
existence of the Armenian state can be open to question”. For its
part, Armenia says it owns missiles that can hit targets 300 km into
Azeri territory.

In a rare occurrence in international relations, on August 4, the US
Ambassador to Yerevan and the Armenian Minister of Defense published a
joint press release in which they expressed “their deep concern for
the recent increase in tensions” and state that they “have explored
ways to de-escalate the situation”. The US diplomat went as far as to
express “his condolences to the families of soldiers who lost their
lives during recent events”. No initiative of this kind has been
undertaken by the US ambassador to Baku. It was thus made clear that
Washington held Azerbaijan responsible for the military escalade. The
US and Europe hailed the Russian mediation that led to a
de-escalation. But, unless a political solution can be found to the
conflict, Azerbaijan (which refuses the current status quo) risks
resuming hostilities over the medium term.

Time is running out for Baku which, over the next 5-6 years, is going
to lose its importance as an oil supply source. The production from
its three main fields (Azeri, Chirag and Deep Guneshli – ACG) did not
reach its target of 50 million tons/annum in 2011. Since then, it has
hit a ceiling of around 42 million tons/annum. In October 2012, Aliyev
publicly accused BP (the operator of ACG) of having lied to it. It
issued an order to the company to stabilize production. At best, the
latter could be maintained for another few years, but with a rise in
production costs, and therefore a drop in the State’s revenues. A
total of 2.5 billion barrels have been produced on ACG to date. At the
current rate of 315 million barrels/annum, 70% of the ACG’s original
proven reserves of 6 billion barrels will have been produced within
the next five years.

It is over the next five years that Azerbaijan is also going to
develop phase 2 of the Shah Deniz field, in order to supply 6
bcm/annum of gas to Turkey and 10 bcm/annum to Europe, as of 2019. At
least $56 billion will be invested in this project. This gas is going
to be transported via the same route as the current pipelines of the
Southern Corridor. In certain places, these run only 25 km away from
the front line with Armenia. They are therefore highly vulnerable.
Furthermore, Azerbaijan’s relations with its main ally in the region,
Turkey, could change. When the Shah Deniz gas lines are built, Baku
will be completely dependent on Ankara for its oil and gas exports,
with the exception of small volumes sold via Georgia and Russia. On
the other hand, Ankara will be able to diversify its oil and gas
transits, thanks to additional volumes from Iran and Iraq. The new
‘rapport de forces’ that will then emerge between Azerbaijan and
Turkey could enable the latter to take its distance from Baku’s
political stance (which it has unreservedly supported up to now) if it
deems this necessary for its national interests.

In other words, Baku had better solve the problem of Nagorno-Karabagh
one way or another by 2019-20. The closer it gets to this date, the
more its position will be weakened. Furthermore, its net hydrocarbon
revenues are going to continue to fall and its capacity to purchase
arms will also dwindle. Gas sales cannot compensate for the drop in
its oil revenues, as the investments required by Shah Deniz are very
high and gas prices usually suffer from a discount compared with oil.
Furthermore, the price of Shah Deniz 2 gas is indexed on the European
spot market, which up to now has been lower than the price of the
Russian or Algerian gas indexed on oil.

The recent micro-war has brought to light a complex political
equation. On the one hand, the Americans and Europeans designed the
Southern Corridor in order to enable the export routes for Azeri oil
and gas to bypass Russia. But on the other hand, the micro-war of
August 2014 illustrated that the Western powers need the Russians to
ensure the security of these pipelines, which are supposed to
contribute to the security of Europe’s energy supply. The conflicting
parties also need the Russians. And this will remain to be the case
for as long as conflict zones subsist in the region… Thus, in a
nutshell, the current status quo suits Russia and, insofar as the
situation will depend on Moscow, the latter will only support a change
if it thinks it can benefit from the new status quo even more than it
does now.

http://civilnet.am/petrostrategies-baku-position-karabakh-weaken-2019-2020/

Armenia-Turkey: Yerevan awaiting Erdogan’s reply to invitation to at

Armenia-Turkey: Yerevan awaiting Erdogan’s reply to invitation to
attend 2015 Genocide commemorations

Genocide | 08.09.14 | 10:33

By Naira Hayrumyan
ArmeniaNow correspondent

Armenian FM: Turkey should reconcile with its own past

Turkey is in dispute with itself: it should reconcile with its own
past to be able to build its future. This was the main message of the
article by Armenia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Edward Nalbandian
published in the French newspaper Le Figaro late last week.

On August 28, Nalbandian attended the inauguration of newly elected
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and handed him President Serzh
Sargsyan’s invitation to visit the commemorative events which will
take place on the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide in
Yerevan on April 24, 2014. The “commemoration year” has already begun,
and it promises to be a challenge for Turkey.

Greece’s parliament is going to consider a bill criminalizing the
denial of genocides, including the Genocide of Armenians. Member of
the National Assembly of France Valerie Boyer has also prepared a new
bill on Armenian Genocide criminalization, and it, according to
experts, has a chance of being passed this year.

French President Francois Hollande has already announced that he will
arrive in Yerevan on April 24. Pope Francis will also be with Armenia
on this day. Other world leaders have not yet responded to Sargsyan’s
invitation. Apparently, they are waiting for Erdogan’s reply, because
if the Turkish president declines the invitation, it would mean that
Turkey continues its policy of denial. And the visit to Yerevan by
each of the world leaders will be evidence of an open confrontation
with Turkey.

“The president of Armenia has invited the Turkish president to visit
Armenia on April 24, 2015, on the occasion of the commemoration of the
100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. We hope it will not be a
missed opportunity and Turkey’s president will be in Yerevan on that
day,” Nalbandian wrote in his article. He also reminded that by
speaking about “common pain” and “just memory”, the new prime minister
of Turkey Ahmet Davutoglu emphasizes that “the main goal of Erdogan’s
statement is prevention of worldwide efforts of the Genocide
recognition.”

On April 23, Erdogan issued a first-of-its-kind message on the
“Armenian Issue” with words of condolences addressed not to Armenians
alone, but to all victims of the events during World War I.

The Armenian issue is part of the policy of Western countries to curb
Turkey. Political analyst Igor Muradyan believes that the United
States and European countries, along with Iran and a number of Arab
countries, actively stop attempts of Turkey to expand to Central Asia,
the Middle East and the Caucasus. And the Armenian issue is used as
one of the main weapons
in this police of containment.

There is also another issue – the events in the Middle East could lead
to the division of Iraq, Syria, and the creation of a Kurdish state.
If events develop this way, one would be able to talk about the
termination of the Treaty of Lausanne that determined the new borders
across the region after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in the First
World War. It was because of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire that
Armenian lands were divided between Turkey and Russia.

The revocation of the Treaty of Lausanne may open up enormous chances
for Armenia to restore historical justice. However, the assessment of
Armenian diplomacy in this matter is not entirely positive – analysts
believe that Armenian diplomats should more firmly defend the
country’s interests. For example, some took note that Nalbandian’s
article has no mention of compensation and claims of Armenians.
Although in one of his recent interviews Nalbandian for the first time
declared about the inevitability of reparations.

In Turkey they are trying by all means to resist these processes, but
at the same time they understand the inevitability of recognition of
the property rights of Armenians. It is hardly a coincidence that
there are reports in the Turkish press that Erdogan is building a new
presidential palace and intends to leave Cankaya Palace. For nearly
100 years Turkish presidents have used Chankaya Palace as their
official residence. The building was originally the Kasabian Estate
and belonged to an Armenian named Ohannes Kasabian, an escapee of the
Armenian Genocide.

In his article Nalbandian offers ratification of the 2009 Zurich
protocols, normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations and opening of
the borders as steps towards reconciliation. However, Turkey continues
to push for a solution to the Karabakh conflict in favor of its
regional cousin Azerbaijan as a precondition for normalization of
relations with Armenia. While in Baku last week, Erdogan stated that
the Turkish-Armenian relations would not be settled until the Karabakh
conflict was resolved.

http://armenianow.com/genocide/56662/armenia_genocide_turkey_100th_anniversary_nalbandian_erdogan

Tigranakert fortress may open doors soon – archaeologist

Tigranakert fortress may open doors soon – archaeologist

15:18 * 08.09.14

The head of the archaeological team conducting excavations in
Tigranakert (the ancient Armenian capital on the territory of
Nagorno-Karabakh) says they expect to open the historical city’s
fortress in the near future.

“We are hopeful to open the fortress’ main entrance, which promises
not only a magnificent architectural sample but also, I think, records
about the city. In the central district’s Christian Square. we have
unveiled the second church where we had unearthed a crypt under the
Koran,” Hamlet Petrosyan told reporters on Friday, commenting on the
results of the excavation.

He said they invited three foreign experts to collaborate with the
team last year in an effort to raise worldwide awareness of the
historical Armenian site. “Tigranakert needs to gain recognition
today, so by inviting foreign specialists, we will raise awareness of
the city in those countries as well. Apart from their academic
significance, archaeological excavations are also important in terms
of raising the society’s attention. All Armenians have been involved
in the process. The excavations in Tigranakert are very important, as
we need attention not only by the scientific circles but also ordinary
people,” he explained.

Petrosyan said 30,000-40,000 people annually visit Tigranakert to see
the ancient site.

“And in spite of all that, there is absolutely no attention by either
the authorities or the political parties. The same indifference we see
on the part of the National Academy of Sciences. Yes, they do not
hamper our activities or reject us, but there is no enthusiasm about
that invention which bears witness to the Armenians’ presence in those
territories in the early Christian period,” the archeologist noted.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/09/08/tigranakert/

Austrian FM visits Austrian library of Yerevan Brusov State Universi

Austrian FM visits Austrian library of Yerevan Brusov State University
of Languages and Social Sciences

13:01, 8 September, 2014

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 8, ARMENPRESS: Foreign Minister of Austria
Sebastian Kurz who is in Yerevan on an official visit attended the
Austrian library of the Yerevan State Linguistic University. The
minister and the delegation led by him walked around in the
university, familiarized themselves with the library’s activity, met
with the students.

Rector of the university Gayane Gasparyan attached high importance to
the event. “Our university has always enjoyed Austria’s attention to
our German-speaking students. We implement a wide range of educational
and cultural programs in collaboration with Austria. As a result of
those very programs, our university has founded its Austrian library,
the opening of which was attended by the first lady of Austria,”
Gayane Gasparyan said, Armenpress reports.

The university rector expressed gratitude to the Austrian FM for the
visit. Sebastian Kurz in his turn thanked for the invitation. “We are
very happy for our cooperation with Armenia. The visit of our
delegation proves that. As I was informed, 500 students at the
university study German. They can continue their education in
Austria,” said Kurz. He also listened to the speeches of the
German-learning students and communicated with them.

Diplomatic relations between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic
of Austria were established on 24 January 1992. On 11 October 2011
Arman Kirakossian was appointed Ambassador Extraordinary and
Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Armenia to Austria.

On 28 August 2012 Alois Kraut, Ambassador Extraordinary and
Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Austria to Armenia (with residence
in Vienna), presented his credentials to the President of the Republic
of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan. In June 2011 Aram Marutyan was appointed
Honorary Consul of the Republic of Austria in Armenia.

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/775352/austrian-fm-visits-austrian-library-of-yerevan-brusov-state-university-of-languages-and-social-sciences.html

GARD La députée Françoise Dumas en voyage officiel en Arménie

REVUE DE PRESSE
GARD La députée Françoise Dumas en voyage officiel en Arménie

Françoise Dumas s’envolera aujourd’hui vers l’Arménie. Elle y sera
jusqu’à dimanche, aux côtés d’une délégation de députés socialistes, à
l’invitation du Fra Dachnaktsoutioun et du Comité de défense de la
Cause Arménienne.

Une visite qui aura pour but de commémorer le centenaire de la mort de
Jean Jaurès, qui fut impliqué dans la cause arménienne.

la suite…

lundi 8 septembre 2014,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

https://www.objectifgard.com/2014/09/04/gard-la-deputee-francoise-dumas-en-voyage-officiel-en-armenie/

Bakou satisfait de la position de l’OTAN sur le Karabagh

Relations internationales
Bakou satisfait de la position de l’OTAN sur le Karabagh

Le gouvernement azerbaïdjanais a félicité l’OTAN pour la réaffirmation
de son soutien à l’intégrité territoriale de l’Azerbaïdjan dans le
conflit du Haut-Karabagh lors de son dernier sommet tenu au Pays de
Galles.

“Les alliés restent dans la même ligne concernant leur soutien à
l’intégrité territoriale, l’indépendance et la souveraineté de
l’Arménie, l’Azerbaïdjan, la Géorgie et la République de Moldovie”,
ont affirmé le président américain Barack Obama et les dirigeants des
27 autres Etats membres de l’OTAN dans une déclaration commune adoptée
vendredi.

“Dans ce contexte, nous allons continuer à soutenir les efforts en vue
d’un règlement pacifique des conflits dans le Caucase du Sud, ainsi
que dans la République de Moldovie, sur la base de ces principes et
des normes du droit international, la Charte des Nations Unies ”
ajoutait la déclaration.

L’OTAN avait adopté des termes pratiquement identiques lors de ses
précédents sommets. Serge Sarkissian a évité de prendre part à ces
rassemblements pour protester contre la non-utilisation de l’OTAN du
principe de l’autodétermination des peuples défendue par l’Arménie
dans le conflit du Karabagh. Une combinaison de l’autodétermination et
de l’intégrité territoriale a été au coeur des propositions de paix du
Karabagh faites par les États-Unis, la France et la Russie au cours de
la dernière décennie.

S’adressant au sommet jeudi, Sarkissian a mis en garde les dirigeants
de l’OTAN contre l’inclusion de formulations pro-azerbaïdjanaises dans
leur déclaration, soufflées par la Turquie. Il les a exhortés à
adopter à la place “la langue du Groupe de Minsk de l’OSCE”,
co-présidé par les Etats-Unis, la Russie et la France.

L’appel de Sarkissian est clairement tombé dans l’oreille d’un sourd.
L’Arménie n’a pas encore réagi à la déclaration de l’OTAN.

L’Azerbaïdjan, en revanche, n’a pas tardé à se féliciter de ce
document. Le chef de la politique étrangère du président Ilham Aliev,
Novruz Mammadov, a déclaré vendredi soir que “la position de l’OTAN
n’a pas changé.” “Étant donné que l’OTAN est aujourd’hui l’organisme
politico-militaire numéro 1, son soutien est très important”.

lundi 8 septembre 2014,
Claire (c)armenews.com

Letters: Michael Kustow’s thinking was bold, his ambition high

Letters: Michael Kustow’s thinking was bold, his ambition high

Jeremy Isaacs, Tony Gordon, Bernard Regan and Mike Westbrook
theguardian.com, Sunday 7 September 2014 16.17 BST

Highbrow argument: Michael Kustow in 1968, as director of the ICA.
Photograph: Chris Morris/Rex

Jeremy Isaacs writes: Channel 4 was charged, by Act of Parliament, with
providing a “distinctive” service; as its commissioning editor for the
arts, Michael Kustow did much to make that promise good. His thinking was
bold, his ambition high. Peter Brook’s Hindu saga, The Mahabharata; Peter
Hall’s masked Oresteia; Pina Bausch’s Bluebeard’s Castle and Tony
Harrison’s V, directed by Richard Eyre, tumbled on to the screen one after
the other. BBC2 commissioned an opera from Harrison Birtwistle, Yan Tan
Tethera, but declined to broadcast it. Kustow snapped it up for Channel 4;
the television version we made was simulcast with the BBC’s Radio 3. He
brought together the artist Tom Phillips and the film-maker Peter Greenaway
to attempt A TV Dante: eight episodes of The Inferno resulted. Kustow
behaved as a patron of the arts in a grand manner.

Himself an unreconstructed egghead, Kustow also offered highbrow argument.
The programme Voices began with Al Alvarez chairing a debate, with George
Steiner, Mary McCarthy and Joseph Brodsky, on the effect on artists of
dictatorship. Six series of Voices were screened at 11pm. And there were
programmes such as Psychoanalysis Today (Michael Ignatieff) and Philosophy
Today (John Searle). Thoughtful viewers in those days owed much to Michael
Kustow. He deserves to be remembered for it.

Tony Gordon writes: In the 1970s, Michael Kustow generously answered an
optimistic plea from Colin Jellicoe and myself (who both owned small
galleries) to visit us in Manchester to discuss a possible exhibition of
northern based artists at the National Theatre. He was the NT exhibitions
director at the time.

Where to go for lunch? He suggested Armenian, as part of his family had
originated from Armenia and he loved the food. At the time, Colin and I
were both struggling financially and couldn’t really afford the restaurant,
but luckily Arto der Haroutunian, the restaurant owner, happened to be one
of our artists. Michael proved great company, very entertaining and most
gracious.

In due course, the exhibition was organised and filled the foyers of the
NT. Looking back, it was not the greatest of exhibitions and was rightly
slated by Time Out. However, the knock-on effect was my contemporary
jewellery exhibition Dazzle which stayed for 32 years at the NT, until it
moved along the South Bank last year to the Oxo building.

Bernard Regan writes: In the last 10 years Michael Kustow and I worked
together on a number of projects. One was Another Israel, a meeting at the
NUT headquarters in Euston Road, London, which gave a platform to speakers
from Israel opposed to the policies of the Israeli government. Michael
organised the filming of the event, which was packed. He was supportive of
all those who wanted to open the debate within the Jewish community about
what was happening to the Palestinian people and of those within Israel who
sought to question their government’s actions.

Michael visited Israel and the West Bank and took a close interest in
theFreedom theatre in Jenin. I think he made a political journey, too –
always questioning and challenging, but engaged and never negative. He
brought his wide interest in the arts to bear on how he thought about the
issues and how he sought to engage people in a dialogue and discussion
about them.

Mike Westbrook writes: One of Mike Kustow’s projects was an English version
of Roger Planchon’s surrealist opera about Al Capone, Mama Chicago. The
original music and the songs had got lost, so Mike wrote new lyrics and
asked me to write the music. The piece had been commissioned by the
Crucible theatre, Sheffield. I duly wrote the score, and my group the Brass
Band was booked to play for the show, on-stage. At the last minute the
theatre’s director got cold feet about the possible impact of this
avant-garde production on the provincial audience and pulled the plug.

The Mama Chicago songs stayed on the shelf until Kate Westbrook and I had
the idea of using them as the basis for a jazz cabaret, a form of
music-theatre, incorporating improvisation, that we had been developing
with the band. The show was first staged at Charles Marowitz’s Open Space
theatre, a disused post office by Warren Street tube. We invited Michael to
the premiere, having told him nothing of our plans. To our great relief, he
loved the show, and did not seem to mind a bit that we had reworked some of
his lyrics as stand-alone songs rather than parts of an operatic scenario.

At the Edinburgh festival in 1978, Mama Chicago won the Fringe award. Over
the succeeding years, Kate, Phil Minton and I, with a succession of bands,
gave frequent London performances, and toured the jazz cabaret throughout
France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland and Scandinavia, and once to Australia.
It was filmed for BBC TV, broadcast on radio, and recorded as a double
album. In fact, Mama Chicago was one of our most successful projects.

It pleased Michael that the piece he had sparked off reached such a wide
audience. His text for Song of the Rain, featured in the show by Phil
Minton, is a work of genius – poignant, witty, and soulful. One of the last
times we met was at the Theatre Museum in Covent Garden for the launch of
his Peter Brook biography. At Mike’s request, Kate sang Song of the Rain.
He described that lyric as “God given”. He has left us a great theatre song
to remember him by.

http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/sep/07/letters-michael-kustow-obituary

No expectation from NATO

No expectation from NATO

14:34 | September 6,2014 | Politics

“NATO will gradually change its emphasis and will come forward with
its obvious Azerbaijani position,”- says politician Yervand Bozoyan.

There is no ward about the right of people’s self-determination in
NATO Summit declaration. Only the principle of territorial integrity
is stressed.

“There is no serious expectation for Armenia from that union,”- summed
up Yervand Bozoyan.

http://en.a1plus.am/1195588.html