NATO And Planned ‘Chaos’ In The NWO

NATO AND PLANNED ‘CHAOS’ IN THE NWO

PRAVDA, Russia
Sept 10 2014

10.09.2014

By Takis Fotopoulos

Nowadays, many people who do not even have the time to spare to
understand what is really going on around them–particularly those
absorbed into the struggle for survival who mainly let the TV “experts”
think for them–usually form the impression that we live in a chaotic
world. I refer, of course, to the victims of neoliberal globalization –
the great majority of the world population – and not those who benefit
from it, including many in the intelligentsia who can not even see
that there is a New World Order (NWO) based on neoliberal globalization
and managed by a Transnational Elite (TE)-basically the elites of the
“G7” countries. However, it is only within such an analytical framework
that one can really understand why our world is anything but chaotic,
in the common sense of the unpredictable disorder.

Print version Font Size Send to friend

The beheadings in Iraq repeated continuously on TV screens (with
the obvious intention of the media controlled by the TE to whip up
islamophobia and distract attention from the far bigger massacre in
Gaza, as a counterbalance to the rise of anti-Zionism around the world)
are directly connected with the NATO-led invasion and the consequent
destruction of Iraq.[1] Similarly, the latter is directly linked to
the previous brutal NATO bombings in Yugoslavia that were designed
to dismember that country, as well as to the similar NATO bombings in
Libya that followed, which destroyed the country’s infrastructure and
converted it into a ‘failed state’. Then, came the organized armed
“insurrection” in Syria and nobody will be surprised if similar to
the Libyan NATO bombings are about to start there, on the pretext of
fighting Islamist terrorists (the same ones who up to a few months ago
were supported by the TE with the aim to overthrow Assad!). Finally, we
saw this year that the model of armed ‘insurrections’ was transplanted
to the European soil itself, in Ukraine, which threatens to draw even
the entire continent into an all-out war.[2]

At the same time, we witness the continued inhumane Zionist ethnic
cleansing of Palestinians, or the “incremental genocide”, as it
has been called by the Jewish historian Ilan Pappe,[3] who is one
of the most important historians who substantiated it, and at the
forefront of the few truly anti-Zionist Jews. This is in contrast
to the international Zionist elite[4], who are now busy in passing
fascist inspired “anti-racist” laws into EU parliaments. Thus, a
legally mandatory way of perceiving even historical events such as
the “Holocaust” is introduced, which now must be recognized (with
the threat of imprisonment!) as a historically unique genocide. This
despite the fact that, for example, the genocide of the Armenians
(or the Armenian “Holocaust” as it is sometimes called ) was probably
much more extensive – not to mention the genocide of Indians in the
Americas, Australia etc., which essentially wiped out whole nations!

This is of course an old debate that began in these countries which
introduced first similar legislation, given their involvement or
sympathies to Nazi Germany (i.e. Germany itself, Austria, Switzerland,
France etc) but has now resurfaced given the present EU systematic
effort to force European parliaments to pass similar legislation
(the latest example being Greece). France, in particular, became
infamous when it used such a law to prosecute even the well known
communist and resistance fighter Roger Garaudy as “Holocaust denier”,
establishing the fascist principle that historical events are not
subject of historical research and collective memory but a matter to
be dealt with by the state and whoever controls it![5]

The link between all these wars and massacres, but also the
corresponding economic warfare now strangling the Greek people,
the Portuguese, the Spaniards (and currently even the French people
who still resist globalization), is the systematic effort by the TE
running the NWO of neoliberal globalization to integrate all peoples
not yet fully integrated into it. However, despite the nonsense of
the degenerate “Left”, which talks about “bad” neoliberal policies etc.

imposed by some “traitors” of social democracy, or the equivalent
nonsense of the Palaeolithic Marxist Left which attempts to “explain”
these wars with the doctrine of “intra-imperialist conflicts” the
consequence Is simply the turn of the popular strata to the patriotic
or nationalist right, if not the far right itself, as we have seen in
the last European elections. The ideological bankruptcy of the ‘left’
became evident when it was unable to explain the unprecedented unity of
the TE in supporting all these wars, despite the ‘intra-imperialist
conflicts’. Unless, of course, the only imperialisms around are
on the one hand the TE imperialism and on the other the Russian
‘imperialism’, despite the fact that the Russian Federation has not
begun any imperialist war in its history nor of course controls the
world economy through Transnational Corporations (TNCs), or the world
polity through hundreds of military bases around the world, or finally
the world media, through press corporations and press magnates.

All this, at the very moment when the TE-controlled media are busy
in promοting the myth of Russia bent to conquer the world whereas
any theory about the NWÃŽ~_ of neolibereal globalization and the TE
running it is dismissed (with the decisive help o the same “Left”)
as a conspiracy theory. Unsurprisingly, this “Left” accuses Hollande
for an about turn with respect to his socialist promises forgetting
that his predecessor Mitterand was also forced to do exactly the same
about turn, let alone Oscar Lafontaine in Germany who was forced to
resign when he attempted to introduce economic policies not compatible
with neoliberal globalization.

This is of course because it is now inconceivable for any country
fully integrated into the NWO to implement any different policies
from the universal neoliberal policies. This is not some sort of a
conspiracy,[6] or just a bad ideology implemented by some baddies
(bankers, politicians etc). This is just the inevitable consequence
of opening and liberalizing the markets for capital, commodities
and labour and joining the international institutions controlled by
the TE (WTO, IMF, WB etc) whose job is to impose these policies when
e.g. a member country asks for a loan or to benefit from an investment
program. Needless to add that the dismantling of economic self-reliance
by globalization and the creation of export economies everywhere turns
most countries integrated into the NWO and particularly the weaker
ones into beggars of the TNCs’ investment, so that they could avoid
stagnation and borrowing . THerefore, every country knows very well
to whose tune it should dance.

Furthermore, not only are the BRICS (except Russia) completely
integrated into the NWO, without sharing any significant transnational
sovereignty (economic, political, military, cultural and media power at
the transnational level), but even worse, their national sovereignty
is clearly inferior to that of Russia. China, for example, is highly
integrated into the global economy, a fact that has led to a dramatic
increase in inequality in this “socialist” country, since it was
fully integrated into the NWO,[7] whereas its status as an economic
superpower is clearly based on its huge population (the purchasing
power of its GDP per head of the population is 99th in the world)
and the significant industrial and trade power created by the massive
move of TNCs from the TE countries, in the past thirty years or so,
in the pursuit of production cost minimisation and profit maximisation.

The above conclusions about Russia were confirmed also last week at the
NATO Summit, in a Cardiff under occupation by the security services ,
where, discussions were held on how to directly subdue the people in
Eastern Ukraine (who are resisting the junta imposed on them via a
“coup from below’ organised by the Transnational Elite) but also
to indirectly subdue the Russian people, the vast majority of whom
support the resistance struggle.

So, the critical decision that will determine the fate not only
of Russia and the Eurasian Union, but of all of us, will be taken
within Russia itself. One option is for the pro-globalization part of
the Russian elite to prevail; the alternative is for the patriotic
anti-globalization part of it to predominate. Which option will be
chosen will determine whether Russia will capitulate to the global
governance of the TE, or whether, instead, it will act as a leader of
an alternative world order of sovereign states based on the Eurasian
Union, as originally conceived, which will aim to achieve national
and economic self-reliance in each country – a prerequisite for any
systemic change in the future …

Takis Fotopoulos

Takis Fotopoulos is a political philosopher, editor of Society &
Nature/Democracy and Nature/The International Journal of Inclusive
Democracy. He has also been a columnist for the Athens Daily
Eleftherotypia since 1990. Between 1969 and 1989 he was Senior Lecturer
in Economics at the University of North London.

This article is a synthesis of two articles that were first published
in TF’s weekly column in Sunday’s Eleftherotypia (a Greek daily
published in Athens) on 31/8/2014 and 7//9/2014. The translation into
English was edited by Jonathan Rutherford.

[1] See Takis Fotopoulos, “ISIS role in destruction
of Iraq by transnational elite”, RT, 11/7/2014

[2] see Takis Fotopoulos, Ukraine: The attack on Russia and the
Eurasian Union (to be published shortly by Progressive Press).

[3] Ilan Pappe, “Israel’s incremental genocide in
the Gaza ghetto”, The Electronic Intifada, 13/7/2014

[4] see for the relation between the TE and the Zionist
elite, Takis Fotopoulos, The Zionist Brutalization Within
the New World Order and the Need for a United Multi-national
and Multicultural State*, The International Journal of
INCLUSIVE DEMOCRACY, Vol. 10, Nos. 1/2 (Winter-Summer 2014)

[5] see for a discussion of the issues involved in this sort
of fascist inspiration legislation, Norman Finkelstein, The
Holocaust Industry, (Verso, 2000) and for an older discussion,
Mark Weber, “Switzerland’s Anti-Racism Law”, The Journal of
Historical Review, July/August 1998 (Vol. 17, No. 4), page 13

[6] see e.g. for a best seller of such a conspiracy theory Naomi Klein,
The Shock Doctrine, (Penguin, 2008)

[7] ‘China reveals income gap statistics after 12 year of silence’,
RT, 18/1/2013

http://rt.com/op-edge/172084-isis-iraq-destruction-elite/
http://electronicintifada.net/content/israels-incremental-genocide-gaza-ghetto/13562
http://www.inclusivedemocracy.org/journal/vol10/vol10_no1-2_The_Zionist_Brutalization_Takis.html
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n4p13_Weber.html
http://rt.com/business/china-income-gap-reveals-288/
http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/10-09-2014/128496-nato_chaos-0/

Armenia Exported 1630 MT Of Peaches In 2014

ARMENIA EXPORTED 1630 MT OF PEACHES IN 2014

Fresh Plaza, Netherlands
Sept 10 2014

As of 5 September, Armenia exported 1630 MT of peaches, whereas for
12 months of 2013 the total export equalled 977 MT. The production
was mainly exported to Russia, – reported the press service of the
Ministry of Agriculture.

According to statistics, this year Armenia exported 1255 MT of
watermelon, and the whole lot was sent to Georgia. However, in 2013,
Armenia did not export even a single kilo of watermelon.

Search For Causes Of USSR Disintegration In Karabakh -3

SEARCH FOR CAUSES OF USSR DISINTEGRATION IN KARABAKH -3

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Sept 10 2014

10 September 2014 – 12:53pm
By Peter Lyukimson, Kuryer, Israel, N28-32, June 1992

Peter Lyukimson lived in Baku until 1991. He worked as a journalist
there in the late 80s-early 90s and witnessed the events preceding
the conflict around Nagorno-Karabakh, Sumgayit, Khojaly…

The feature story “Nagorno-Karabakh: chronicles of the conflict. Notes
of a Jew from Baku” was written in 1992, soon after the move of
the author to Israel. It was published in a Russian-language paper
of Israel named Kuryer. Those were the times when the tone in the
cultural and the public life of the Russian-speaking community of
Israel was set by the Moscow and Saint Petersburg clerisy. It had a
big impact on the attitude of Israeli society towards the events on
the territory of the former USSR. They sympathized with Armenia in its
conflict with Azerbaijan. As it turned out, most Israelis knew nothing
about the origin of the conflict or the truth about its development.

The position of the Jewish clerisy on the issue was formed based only
on publications in the central Soviet and partly on Western press,
which were not always impartial.

… In early March, Armenian cinematographers start demonstrating
dreadful shots of the Sumgayit tragedy. The announcer said that
Armenians could not live in a single state with Azerbaijanis and the
only solution was to take the NKAO under Armenian control.

Soon Armenia started indiscreetly talking about driving Azerbaijanis
out of Zangezur. On March 2 new Azerbaijani refugees started moving
from Armenia. Strikes were declared again in Stepanakert and Yerevan
20 days later. Moscow decided that it was time to do something about
it. On March 24, 1988, the CPSU Central Committee and the USSR Council
of Ministers passed a decree on measures to speed up the socio-economic
development of the Nagorno-Karabakh Oblast in 1988-1995 that would
suit protesters in Stepanakert…

Then, orators started saying that the case was not an economic or
cultural problem and that the NKAO wanted nothing from Azerbaijan.

“Turkomans get out of Karabakh!”, “Never with Azerbaijan!” were some
of the slogans seen at demonstrations. Carriages with food froze on
the Stepanakert Tovarnaya, people showed that they would rather die
of hunger than take bread from their foes….

Meanwhile, deportation of Azerbaijanis from Stepanakert started, more
and more refugees kept moving to Baku from Armenia… By late June,
their number amounted to about 200,000 people… The situation was very
complicated. On July 12, 1988, the attendees of the regional session
of the NKAO Council separated from Azerbaijan. When enterprises began
shutting down in Baku, everyone figured that it would cause greater
losses than the strikes in the NKAO and Yerevan. Moscow appointed
Vezirov as the head of the Communist Party in Azerbaijan.

A few days later, an expended session of the Presidium of the
USSR Armed Forces, where Gorbachev demonstrated qualities of an
outstanding political duelist, took place. He gave amazing proof that
the pretensions of the Armenian side were absurd and the scenario of
such developments was dangerous, as he started realizing just then.

Azerbaijan was watching the political show breathlessly… There,
Gorbachev interrupts the speech of academician Ambartsumyan with
what seemed like a fair question: “Tell us, what was the Azerbaijani
population in Yerevan at the start of the century?”

The academician got confused.

Ambartsumyan: In Yerevan in the early century?

Gorbachev: Yes.

Ambartsumyan: It is hard for me to tell.

Gorbachev: You must know it. I will remind you, 43% were Azerbaijanis
in Yerevan in the early century. What is the percentage of Azerbaijanis
today?

Ambartsumyan: Very few now. Maybe one percent.

Gorbachev: At the same time, I do not want to accuse Armenians of
driving out Azerbaijanis…

And this is his “counterview” with writer V. Petrosyan.

Gorbachev: And another question for you. In your speech and other
speeches, appears an idea that the problems of Nagorno-Karabakh could
be solved by ceding it to Armenia. Tell me, is there any other way
available?

Petrosyan: Mikhail Sergeyevich, I do not see one.

Gorbachev: Let’s say we did make the decision you offer. I am speaking
figuratively. But 400,000 Armenians remain in Azerbaijan, 207,000 of
them in Baku. 500,000 Armenians live in Georgia. What do we do with
them? Should we send them to Armenia?

Petrosyan: That is a different story…

Gorbachev: If we cannot resolve the problem other than by constructing
some state formation and amendments to the Constitution for one part
of the population, then we need to do something for the other part
of the population. What do we do with Tajiks living in Uzbekistan,
Uzbeks living in Tajikistan then? How many Azerbaijanis are there in
Georgia now, Comrade Gilashvili?

Gilashvili: Up to 500,000.

Gorbachev: What do we do with them? They live on the border with
Azerbaijan, they are easy to separate…

As a result, the Presidium passed a set of decisions supporting
Azerbaijan in general. On September 3 reports were made about attacks
on the last Azerbaijani district – Kirkijan. Villagers found leaflets:
‘Azerbaijanis! You do not belong on Atsakh land!” On September 8,
Stepanakert started a new political strike supported by huge foreign
assistance. Most of the money settled in the pockets of the heads of
the Karabakh committee. Part of it was distributed among the strikers,
and it seemed enough for people to feed their families for quite
a while.

To be continued

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/articles/politics/59783.html

Heffern: U.S. Will Continue Developing Defense Cooperation With Arme

HEFFERN: U.S. WILL CONTINUE DEVELOPING DEFENSE COOPERATION WITH ARMENIA

18:59 10/09/2014 ” POLITICS

Armenian Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan met with U.S. Ambassador to
Armenia John Heffern and newly appointed Defense Attache Anthony Sebo.

General Sebo presented a letter of credentials from U.S. Defense
Secretary Chuck Hagel, the press service of the Armenian Defense
Ministry said.

During the meeting, Seyran Ohanyan and John Heffern discussed bilateral
ties between Armenia and the U.S. as well as defense cooperation
within NATO, in particular in the context of the new platform for
cooperation with the partners created during the NATO summit in Wales.

Ambassador Heffern said that the United States will continue developing
defense cooperation with Armenia in all areas of mutual interest.

The parties also discussed regional security issues.

Source: Panorama.am

Zhoghovurd: Intestinal Infection Hits Armenian Town?

ZHOGHOVURD: INTESTINAL INFECTION HITS ARMENIAN TOWN?

09:24 * 10.09.14

An outbreak of an intestinal disease in the southern town of Kajaran
(Syunik region) is said to have led to the hospitalization of several
residents, including school-age children.

Nune Gevorgyan, the head of the Regional Administration’s Healthcare
Department whom the paper contacted for comments, said they are still
unsure about the causes of the disease.

“Only 14 people have been hospitalized, of whom three receive treatment
in Kajaran and the others – at the Kapan Medical Center. Two of the
eleven are school-age children. They are pupils of the same school and
are at the Children’s Department. The other nine are at the Department
of Infectious Diseases. It hasn’t been clarified yet whether or not
it is an infection,” she was quoted as saying.

Armenian News – Tert.am

ISTANBUL: Turkish-German director Akın says his new movie `doesn’t

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Sept 6 2014

Turkish-German director Akın says his new movie `doesn’t apologize’ over Armenian issue

Zeynep Miraç

`The Cut,’ Turkish-German director Fatih Akın’s new movie based on the
1915 events, made its long-anticipated world premiere at the 71st
Venice Film Festival earlier this week. The film has received a mixed
response from critics so far, but Akın says it has `fulfilled its
purpose.’

The Armenians say the World War I-era mass killings under the rule of
the Ottoman Empire amounted to `genocide.’ The Turkish state has
always denied this, saying that any deaths were the result of civil
strife that erupted when Armenians took up arms for independence in
eastern Anatolia.

While `The Cut’ takes the traumatic 1915 events as its starting point,
what follows is a transcontinental journey story following the central
character, Nazareth, trying to reunite with his family after the
trauma of the massacres. Fatih Akın spoke to Hürriyet about the film,
his motivations behind making it, and the initial critical reaction.

Q: One of the actors in the movie, Simon Abkarian, has said `The Cut
is the movie that Armenians were waiting for.’ So did you make this
movie for Armenians?
A: Actually I made the movie mostly for Turks. I’m Turkish and I made
this movie for my people. Cinema belongs to the whole world, anyone
can take whatever they want from this movie. Simon sees it that way;
he liked this movie and believed in his part in it. Maybe Armenians
were not expecting a film like this from a Turk. Maybe that’s what we
were trying to imply.

Q: Why did you make this movie?
A: Who else could it have been? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t see myself
at center stage. [Turkish journalist] Hasan Cemal has a book on the
genocide, and I have artist friends doing work on it. There’s a group
of Turks who accept this, and the group is getting bigger every day.
In terms of making a movie about it, maybe I am the first. But it
feels like day by day it’s getting easier to talk about this topic.
The taboos and strictness of just 10 years ago seem weaker now.

Q: What was the reason for this softening process in your opinion?
A: Hrant’s death. It feels like it led to a purification on the topic.
Thoughts of empathy became more visible in Turkey.

Q: You said Hasan Cemal’s `1915: Armenian Genocide’ book encouraged
you. In what sense?
A: It gave me courage to use the `genocide’ word. Before that I had
developed strategies to avoid using that word when I was talking about
the happenings. Hasan Cemal broke this self-developed fear. I must
also say this: As you know, DoÄ?a Perinçek appealed to the European
Court of Human Rights arguing that rejection of the genocide should
not be considered a crime, and this objection was accepted. Actually,
this was also Hrant Dink’s idea. He said `Denying the genocide
shouldn’t be prohibited.’ He opposed France’s attitude and I also
agree with him.

Q: Everyone says that you’re very brave. When you started the journey
of filming this movie, did you have to tell yourself to be brave?
A: I don’t want to make anyone sad. Especially the people around me. I
have a family and what they think matters. My mother, my father, my
wife¦ I sat them in front of me and asked: `I want to do this, what do
you think?’ We exchanged our ideas. If I was completely alone, if I
didn’t have my family, I wouldn’t have thought about anything.

Q: After an interview you gave to Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos, you
received a threat from a far-right Turkish magazine. There may also
have been other threats. Has this made you fear for your life?
A: There’s only been one threat and no, I’m not worried. I’ve worked
on this movie for seven years and I have prepared myself for these
threats. Social media should be used properly. Someone writes
something, the European media makes a big deal out of it. But the
Turkish media didn’t make a big deal out of it. Outside of Turkey,
they wrote `Turkey is against the movie’ just because of one guy’s
comment. Turkey should take this situation seriously, because I don’t
believe it is against this movie – neither the administration, nor the
government, nor the society.

Q: Another question in people’s minds is: Why you didn’t put the movie
out in 2015, the 100th anniversary of the events?
A: I wanted it to be released as soon as possible. That’s why I
increased the tempo and finished it before 2015. Some countries, like
France, will screen it in 2015, but that’s not a decision that is left
up to me.

Q: Did you shoot this movie out of feelings of responsibility, of
guilt? Is this your apology movie?
A: I do feel responsibility, yes. I wasn’t born then and neither was
my father. But I belong to this society and that’s what I feel
responsibility for. As for the apology, a film doesn’t apologize. You
go there and you apologize. That’s different¦

Q: The first reviews of the movie have been quite mixed. The Guardian
and Variety were lukewarm in their praise. What do you think about
these reviews?
A: This is a first for me. I have encountered harsh reviews for the
first time. It turns out I’ve been a little spoiled by critics in the
past. I had to wait until I was 41 to experience this. It’s difficult
because they’re criticizing my child. I have to analyse this
situation. The initial purpose of the movie was for my mother, my
father, and my friends in Turkey to like it. At the same time for
Armenian society, Armenia and the Armenian diaspora to like it. This
is actually a pretty impossible aim. I started the journey by asking,
`Could this movie act as bridge?’ Could it unite those in Turkey who
accept the genocide and those who don’t? That was my question.

Q: Looking at the initial responses, do you think the movie fulfilled this task?
A: I asked myself, `Will the Armenians find the movie too light?’ as
it’s not about what happened. My Turkish friends liked the movie too.
If you want to bring together two sides standing against each other,
you have to pay a price; maybe that price is these reviews.

Q: When you were shooting `The Cut,’ was this task more important than
the cinematic language?
A: You can fulfil that task with cinema. I didn’t have a concern like
`I have to prove my style.’ I didn’t get caught up in such an complex.
I wanted to grab the public, two groups with opposing opinions. I
think the critics were expecting something different from me, whatever
that expectation was¦

Q: Would you be offended if `The Cut’ became one of those movies that
the critics severely criticize but the public is very interested in?
A: No. Maybe it really is a movie for society. I hope it is, it would
be fitting for the movie.

Q: When will it be screened in Turkey?
A: Our intention is to screen it in the autumn.

Q: Are you facing any difficulties about getting it screened?
A: The cinemas are scared about whether some people will protest? If
they sprayed tear gas during the Gezi protests because the public
peace was disrupted, then police can come and `protect’ the cinemas
too.

September/06/2014

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-german-director-akin-says-his-new-movie-doesnt-apologize-over-armenian-issue.aspx?pageID=238&nID=71369&NewsCatID=381

Soccer Euro 2016: Result: Denmark come from behind to beat Armenia i

Aports Mole, UK
Sept 8 2014

Result: Denmark come from behind to beat Armenia in Group I opener

Goals from Pierre Hojbjerg and Thomas Kahlenberg give Denmark victory
over Armenia in their opening Group I Euro 2016 qualifier.

By Pascal Lemesre, Championship Correspondent

Filed: Sunday, September 7, 2014 at 19:24 UK
Last Updated: Monday, September 8, 2014 at 17:11 UK

All three goals came in the second half as Denmark fought back from
1-0 down to beat Armenia and begin their Euro 2016 qualifying campaign
with a win in Group I.

After a first half of few chances it was visitors Armenia who took the
lead in Copenhagen when Borussia Dortmund’s Henrikh Mkhitaryan found
the bottom corner with a low left-foot drive from 20 yards.

Fifteen minutes later Denmark were level when Bayern Munich youngster
Pierre Hojbjerg fired home from outside the area for his first senior
international goal.

It also made him the youngest scorer for Denmark in Euro qualifiers,
breaking the previous record of Tottenham Hotspur’s Christian Eriksen.

Both sides had chances to net the third and it was Denmark who scored
the vital goal with 10 minutes on the clock.

Nicklas Bendtner crossed for Thomas Kahlenberg, who had only been on
the pitch for six minutes when he headed home from six yards.

http://www.sportsmole.co.uk/football/denmark/euro-2016/result/result-denmark-down-armenia_175463.html

Epic Novel Memorialises Armenian Genocide

NEWS.GNOM.ES
Sept 8 2014

Epic Novel Memorialises Armenian Genocide

BANGKOK, Thailand, Sept. 8, 2014 /NEWS.GNOM.ES-iReach/ — ‘Origins:
Discovery’ is a unique epic story set during the greatest conflict in
human history; an alternative history intended to make the reader
laugh, cry and contemplate our most important human values. It is a
novel of love, culture and discovery, in spite of the tragic
background.

Read about the book at

http://news.gnom.es/pr/epic-novel-memorialises-armenian-genocide
http://originsdiscovery.com/

Armenian PM approves proposals to stimulate economy

CISTran Finance
Sept 8 2014

Armenian PM approves proposals to stimulate economy

September 8, 2014 8:30 AM
By Lisa Barron

Armenian Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan held a consultative meeting
recently to discuss government proposals for improving the country’s
business environment and stimulating the economy.

Participants discussed possible measures to provide fiscal support for
rural enterprises, revise the threshold for VAT holidays on imports
and consider a gradual overhaul of the VAT system, subsidize interest
payments on mortgages and implement an electronic payment system for
taxes.

Abrahamyan approved the measures and instructed government officials
to hold discussions with stakeholders and submit the results.

Aktiv Bank declared insolvent by Ukraine’s central

http://cistranfinance.com/news/armenian-pm-approves-proposals-to-stimulate-economy/4533/

Does Armenia support territorial integrity of Azerbaijan?

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Sept 6 2014

Does Armenia support territorial integrity of Azerbaijan?

6 September 2014 – 5:30pm

The NATO summit in Newport (Wales) has forced Armenia to manifest its
support for Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity by signing the 30th
paragraph of the Declaration, which declares the integrity of the
territories of the former Soviet republics.

The alliance has also pledged to continue work on peaceful settlements
of the Nagorno-Karabakh, Georgian-Abkhazian, Georgian-Ossetian and
Transnistrian conflicts on the basis of international law. NATO has
expressed its concern at the time it is taking to resolve these
conflicts.

Even though the 30th paragraph has no legally binding force, it is the
first time in history that the Armenian government has officially
supported the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Azerbaijan.