L’Azerbaidjan Montre Un Manque De Respect Pour Les Mediateurs Intern

L’AZERBAIDJAN MONTRE UN MANQUE DE RESPECT POUR LES MEDIATEURS INTERNATIONAUX SELON LE CHEF DE LA DIPLOMATIE DU KARABAGH

KARABAGH

Il a ete impossible de faire de reels progrès dans les pourparlers
de paix au Karabagh l’annee dernière en raison de la politique
destructrice de l’Azerbaïdjan a declare le ministre des Affaires
etrangères du Haut-Karabagh Karen Mirzoyan.

Lors d’une conference de presse Mirzoyan a declare que la partie
azerbaïdjanaise a choisi une politique d’aggravation de la situation
sans precedent. Il a souligne que de telles mesures revèlent de
la part de l’Azerbaïdjan

Which Are The Final Goals Of Russian And The West? (Video)

WHICH ARE THE FINAL GOALS OF RUSSIAN AND THE WEST? (VIDEO)

10:56 | February 3,2015 | Interview

A1+ interviewed analyst Davit Shahnazaryan.

Which are the final goals of Russian and the West in the West-Russia
conflict, what will they consider a final victory?

Davit Shahnazaryan thinks that the final goal of Russia is to review
the bases of the collapse of the Soviet Union, to reach an agreement
with the West to create a new, global security system, to show the
world that the NATO is a weak organization, etc.

The final goal of the West is to make Russia predictable, to see Russia
without Crimea and to make Russia a part of the Western civilization.

More- in the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKRpUkzTulg
http://en.a1plus.am/1205213.html

After Eurasian Deal, Free Expression Fears In Armenia

AFTER EURASIAN DEAL, FREE EXPRESSION FEARS IN ARMENIA

Institute for War and Peace Reporting, UK
IWPR CRs #766
Feb 3 2015

Membership of Russian-led bloc could mean restrictions on free speech.

By Arpi Harutyunyan

Supporters of free speech in Armenia fear that the country’s accession
to the new Eurasian Economic Union could restrict the free flow
of information.

Armenia joined the union when it came into being at the beginning
of January. The other members are Russia, Belarus and Kazakstan,
with Kyrgyzstan expected to join shortly.

According to a copy of Armenia’s accession agreement posted on the
economy ministry’s website, member states cannot import, export or
distribute material prohibited in other bloc states. Furthermore, the
agreement bans the “distribution of printed, audio and visual materials
liable to harm the political and economic interests of member states,
their national security, or the health and morals of their citizens.”

This wording is part of the terms of trade and customs regulations
that bind the new economic grouping.

Before Armenia joined, its own customs rules determined what could
or could not be brought into the country.

Under the Eurasian Economic Union agreement, restrictions include
the loose concept of member states’ “political interests”.

Suren Deheryan, head of Journalists for the Future, an Armenian press
freedom organisation, is concerned that the restriction will be used
to silence critics.

“This implies that imports of Western press and literature to the
Eurasian Economic Union should be prohibited, since such material
often contains criticism of the [bloc states’] political elite,”
Deheryan said.

Even before Armenia joined the union, critics said accession could
undermine the country’s sovereignty. President Serzh Sargsyan insisted
there was “no danger” to Armenia’s independent status. (See Armenia’s
Eurasian Deal: Sell-Out or Fair Trade? )

For some, those fears have now been realised.

In December, Armen Martirosyan, head of the Antares printing company,
attended a conference on the Eurasian Economic Union in St Petersburg,
where he raised questions about what membership would mean for the
publishing industry.

“I was told that the Eurasian Economic Union was a purely economic
union and that cultural matters were unrelated,” Martirosyan said.

“But in reality they are connected. It turns out that the Eurasian
Economic Union is not purely an economic union; it is gradually
expanding into other areas.”

The editor of the Yerevan Press Club, Heriknaz Harutyunyan, believes
that the Eurasian treaty violates basic human rights and may have
significant consequences not only for dissemination of information
but also on the freedom of movement across borders.

“The ban on the distribution of such prohibited information may
prevent any one of us from leaving the country, for example to travel
Yerevan-Moscow-London,” Harutyunyan told IWPR. “Any absurd pretext
may be cited as a breach of the ban, for example, carrying an ordinary
music CD.”

Not everyone thinks the restrictions will go that far. Deheryan
believes it unlikely that things will reach a point where people
travelling in and out of Armenia need authorisation to carry a book
or a magazine in a suitcase. But he thinks the agreement could still
have far-reaching consequences, particularly as it might pave the
way for moves to muzzle voices critical of the government.

“If we talk about dissent, Russia has already started blocking
websites and blogs that offer alternative opinions, and it has done so
unashamedly, using dozens of amendments to existing legislation as well
as new laws adopted in 2014,” Deheryan said. “Since Russia has taken
control of the content of Runet [Russian domain names] and feels at
liberty to shut down any content that for some reason is inconsistent
with or contrary to law, then why not do the same at customs controls?”

An annex to the Eurasian agreement also bans other kinds of content,
including Nazi propaganda and symbols, justifications of terrorism,
pornography and even election campaign materials deemed illegal in
any of the four states.

Martirosyan said the ban was unconstitutional and would have major
ramifications for his company and the material it publishes. He gave
the example of a book about the 2008 Russian-Georgian war by former
US State Department staffer Ronald Asmus, called A Little War that
Shook the World.

“We have published Asmus’s book and it is now on sale, but according to
the new restrictions we cannot export it to another country because
this runs contrary to the interests of Russia,” he said. “That’s
absurd.”

Martirosyan also questioned the ban on Nazi symbols, particularly
as the ancient swastika remains a common symbol of eternity or God
in Armenia, and appears in several churches such as the 13th-century
Noravank Monastery.

“If someone in Italy publishes a book about Noravank, will it be
impossible to import it to Armenia?” Martirosyan asked.

Ara Shirinyan, director of the Yerevan-based television company
Shoghakat, said the restrictions were comparable to those of the
Soviet era, although in the modern internet age they were by and large
meaningless and could not be enforced. However, he is concerned that
the new law has implications for wider political freedoms in Armenia.

“It may give the authorities an additional lever to persecute political
opponents and individuals,” Shirinyan said.

Arpi Harutyunyan is a freelance journalist in Armenia.

3 Feb 15

https://iwpr.net/global-voices/after-eurasian-deal-free-expression-fears-armenia

Details Unveiled For Armenian Pavilion At The 2015 Venice Biennale

DETAILS UNVEILED FOR ARMENIAN PAVILION AT THE 2015 VENICE BIENNALE

Art Forum
Feb 2 2015

On the occasion of the hundredth year following the Armenian Genocide,
the country’s ministry of culture will be devoting its pavilion to
the artists of the Armenian diaspora.

Eighteen artists in total will be featured: Haig Aivazian (Lebanon),
Nigol Bezjian (Syria/USA), Anna Boghiguian (Egypt/Canada),
Hera BuyuktaÅ~_cıyan (Turkey), Silvina Der-Meguerditchian
(Argentina/Germany), Rene Gabri & Ayreen Anastas (Iran/Palestine/USA),
Mekhitar Garabedian (Belgium), Aikaterini Gegisian (Greece), Yervant
Gianikian & Angela Ricci Lucchi (Italy), Aram Jibilian (USA), Nina
Katchadourian (USA/Finland), Melik Ohanian (France), Mikayel Ohanjanyan
(Armenia/Italy), Rosana Palazyan (Brasil), Sarkis (Turkey/France),
and Hrair Sarkissian (Syria/UK).

Curated by Adelina Cuberyan von Furstenberg, the pavilion will explore
what she’s calling the notion of “armenity,” which in her words
encapsulates concepts of “displacement and territory, justice and
reconciliation, ethos and resilience.” The pavilion will be situated
on the Island of San Lazzaro.

http://artforum.com/news/id=50037

Hraparak: New Dismissals Expected At Vazgen Sargsyan Military Instit

HRAPARAK: NEW DISMISSALS EXPECTED AT VAZGEN SARGSYAN MILITARY INSTITUTE

10:43 03/02/2015 ” DAILY PRESS

The dismissal of the head of Vazgen Sargsyan Military Institute will be
followed by dismissals of a number of deputy heads, Hraparak reports
citing sources. Only one or two of the six deputy heads will remain
in their jobs.

As regards the deputy head whose son is among the suspects in the
recent murder in the institute, he will not only be relieved of his
post, but may also be held criminally accountable, the source told
Hraparak.

http://www.panorama.am/en/popular/2015/02/03/hraparak/

Georgian PM Zurab Zhvania Died 10 Years Ago

GEORGIAN PM ZURAB ZHVANIA DIED 10 YEARS AGO

February 3, 2015 17:45

Photo: REUTERS

Yerevan /Mediamax/. 10 years ago, on February 3, 2005, former Prime
Minister of Georgia Zurab Zhvania died.

Brother of the former PM, MP from “Georgian Dream” ruling coalition
Georgia Zhvania told Mediamax’s own correspondent that he is convinced
the new investigation will be successful. According to him, samples of
the former PM’s remains were sent to the foreign labs to be examined.

>From the very beginning, people in Georgia doubted the official
version that Zurab Zhvania and Vice Governor of Kvemo-Kartli region
Raul Yusupov died of gas leak from the faulty gas heater in the secret
address in Tbilisi.

In October 2012, after the party of former President Mikhail
Saakashvili “United National Movement” had lost power, the
investigation of the case restarted.

– See more at:

http://www.mediamax.am/en/news/society/13060#sthash.RN8wSiDb.dpuf

Groundbreaking Symposium At Columbia University Focusing On Monument

GROUNDBREAKING SYMPOSIUM AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY FOCUSING ON MONUMENTS & MEMORY

By MassisPost
Updated: February 3, 2015

By Taleen Babayan

Major scholars from around the world will participate in a timely,
and thought-provoking conference at Columbia University, “Monuments
and Memory: Material Culture and the Aftermath of Histories of Mass
Violence” on Friday, February 20, 2015.

This all-day symposium concentrating on material culture and memory,
with the ruins of the ancient Armenian city of Ani as the centerpiece,
is organized and hosted by Peter Balakian, Donald M. Constance H.

Rebar Professor of the Humanities at Colgate University, and Rachel
Goshgarian, Assistant Professor of History at Lafayette College, and
sponsored by the Armenian Center of Columbia University, Columbia’s
Institute for the Study of Human Rights, the Institute for Comparative
Literature and Society, and the Armenian General Benevolent Union.

The conference will explore the general themes of restoration,
restitution and social justice and will be groundbreaking in its
comparative analysis of Jewish monuments in Eastern Europe, Muslim
monuments in the Balkans, and Armenian-Christian monuments in Turkey.

Four sessions revolving around these topics will take place throughout
the day, each chaired by a member of the Columbia community who will
conduct and moderate the question and answer sessions.

The first session, “Monuments and Memory: the Significance of Material
Culture in the Aftermath of Genocide,” (10:00 a.m. to 11:15 a.m.),
chaired by Christine Philliou, Associate Professor of History at
Columbia University, will address the historical contexts for the
destroyed or appropriated material cultures of minority peoples in
the aftermath of histories of mass violence. The current conditions of
these monuments will be analyzed, as well as their roles in collective
memory for both occupying and exiled cultures. Presenters include
Peter Balakian; Andrew Herscher, Associate Professor of Architecture
at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and Marianne Hirsch, William
Peterfield Trent Professor of English and Comparative Literature at
Columbia University.

The second session, “The Medieval Armenian City of Ani: A Case Study
in the Politicization of Art History, History, Historical Monuments
and Preservation in a Post-Genocidal Context,” (11:30 a.m. to
12:45 p.m.), chaired by Nanor Kebranian, Assistant Professor in
the Department of Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies
at Columbia University, will include papers on subjects related to
Ani’s multicultural past, cultural destruction, restoration projects,
depiction in modern Turkey, and place in the construction of Armenian
identity. Presenters include Rachel Goshgarian; Christina Maranci,
Arthur H. Dadian and Ara Oztemel Associate Professor of Armenian Art
and Architecture at Tufts University; Heghnar Watenpaugh, Associate
Professor of Art History at the University of California, Davis;
and Yavuz Ozkaya, Restoration Architect at PROMET Architecture and
Restoration Co.

The third session, “Monuments, Memory, Restitution, and Social Justice:
What issues do monuments raise in these historical contexts?

How can social justice and restitution be achieved decades after the
event of genocide or mass-killing?” (2:15 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.) will be
chaired by Hamid Dabashi, Hagop Kevorkian Professor of Iranian Studies
and Comparative Literature at Columbia University. Presenters include
Osman Kavala, Founder of Anadolu Kultur; Leo Spitzer, Kathe Tappe
Vernon Professor of History at Dartmouth University; and Elazar Barkan,
Professor of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University.

The concluding session will be a round table discussion followed by
a reception for participants and attendees.

“Rachel and Peter are bringing together a wide range of speakers
to address the issue of Ani, from historians to cultural heritage
advocates, to practicing architects actively engaged in restoration
projects at Ani,” said Maranci.

“I hope that it will galvanize more dialogue about the fate of the
churches and other ancient monuments in and around Ani, because of
their historical and architectural importance and because of their
structural vulnerability.”

“There is tremendous opportunity here to address the painful history
of Armenians and Turkey and forge a different way forward regarding
Armenian cultural heritage in Turkey,” said Watenpaugh, who recently
published, “Preserving the Medieval City of Ani: Cultural Heritage
Between Contest and Reconciliation” in the Journal of the Society of
Architectural Historians. “This is the right time to have a critical
and public discussion about this site, and the broader issues it
raises.”

Mark Momjian Esq., Chair of the Armenian Center and an alumnus of
Columbia College and Columbia Law School, emphasized his alma mater’s
role not only in aiding the survivors of the Armenian Genocide,
but in advocating support of the Armenian Republic.

“Ambassador Henry Morgenthau was an alumnus of Columbia Law School,
and he is in the pantheon of heroes to the Armenian people. Talcott
Williams was the first director of Columbia’s School of Journalism,
and he was heavily involved with Near East Relief. George Edward
Woodbury, a comparative literature professor at Columbia, assailed
the perpetrators of the Armenian Genocide. And there are countless
others,” said Momjian, a Philadelphia lawyer and community activist.

“This symposium marks the centennial of the Armenian Genocide,
but it also honors the many Columbians who denounced this terrible
crime against humanity and who worked tirelessly to help the Armenian
people.”

The event will take place in Room 1501 of Columbia University’s
Morningside Campus International Affairs Building, located at 420
West 118th Street, from 10 a.m. until 6 p.m. with breaks for lunch
and coffee. A reception will follow. This event is free and open to
the public.

http://massispost.com/2015/02/groundbreaking-symposium-at-columbia-university-focusing-on-monuments-memory/

The Travel Channel’s "Booze Traveler" Visits Armenia

THE TRAVEL CHANNEL’S “BOOZE TRAVELER” VISITS ARMENIA

15:48, 03 Feb 2015
Siranush Ghazanchyan

Cocktail connoisseur Jack Maxwell, host of the Travel Channel’s series
Booze Traveler travels to Armenia to discover the old and new in booze.

He checks out the oldest wine press, tries Ararat brandy and tastes
the nightlife in Yerevan. Along the way, he samples mulberry oghi
before wrapping up his trip at a wedding.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2015/02/03/the-travel-channels-%e2%80%aaboozetraveler%e2%80%ac-visits-armenia/
http://www.travelchannel.com/shows/booze-traveler/episodes/the-armenian-trail

Third Digital Exhibit On Armenian Genocide Released

THIRD DIGITAL EXHIBIT ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RELEASED

17:01, 03 Feb 2015
Siranush Ghazanchyan

A third digital exhibit on the Armenian Genocide consisting of 128
images on 24 panels entitled “The First Deportation: The German
Railroad, the American Hospital, and the Armenian Genocide” was
released today by the Armenian National Institute (ANI), Armenian
Genocide Museum of America (AGMA) and Armenian Assembly of America
(Assembly). Available on the ANI, AGMA, and Assembly websites, the
exhibit focuses on two localities, Zeytun, an Armenian city in the
Taurus Mountains, and Konya, a Turkish city in the central Anatolian
plain, both linked by the Armenian Genocide.

The remote and self-sustaining city of Zeytun was the first Armenian
community in Ottoman Turkey deported en masse in April 1915. To deprive
the Zeytun Armenians of any capacity to defy the deportation edicts,
the Young Turk government divided its population sending one part
east toward the Syrian Desert and another part west to the barren
flats of the Konya Plain.

By this fate, the Zeytun deportees were routed down from their mountain
homes through the nearby city of Marash and the Cilician Plain and back
up through the high passes of the Cilician Gates of the Taurus Range,
the only accessible road from Cilicia to Anatolia. This route also
placed them along the Berlin-Bagdad rail line then under construction
through those very same passes.

By intersecting that rail line, Zeytun Armenians soon found themselves
among the rest of the Armenian population of western Anatolia being
deported east by train to the main terminus at Konya and substations
beyond, where they were offloaded from cattle cars to walk down the
mountain passes, while work crews led by German and Swiss engineers
were cutting open new roads and tunnels to complete the construction
of the rail system.

There also happened to be an American hospital in Konya manned by
three outstanding figures who soon found themselves in the midst
of hundreds of thousands of Armenian deportees and as such became
witnesses to the unfolding of the Armenian Genocide. The station
at Konya was supposed to serve only as a transit camp, but with all
of the Armenians of western and central Anatolia routed through the
city, the open spaces beyond the station transformed into a vast
concentration camp. Because Konya was never intended to exist as
a destination camp and was evacuated within a short time, it has
been forgotten as a major site in the trail of deportation and the
central object of what transpired there overlooked. It was evident to
all observers in the city how rapidly the Ottoman Turkish government
reduced an industrious and prosperous people to misery. In Konya it was
already visible that all it took was a matter of days, not even weeks.

The testimony provided by Dr. Wilfred Post and Dr. William Dodd,
and the efforts of Miss Emma Cushman, all three American medical
missionaries, provide compelling information about the rapidly
deteriorating conditions along the rail line and the start of the
process of extinguishing Armenian life across the region. Their
information is paralleled by the protests of German civilians in the
same area who sharply criticized the Ottoman authorities and raised
questions with their own government about the morality of German
wartime policies.

More compelling still were the photographs taken by Dr. Wilfred Post
and the German railroad engineers that documented the wartime reality
on this particular swath of Ottoman territory. While as wartime
allies of the Turks, Germans enjoyed a certain amount of liberty in
their actions, Dr. Post took a serious risk in defying the ban on
photographing the Armenians.

Retrieved from the United States National Archives, the entire set of
photographs taken by Dr. Wilfred Post are being issued for the first
time in this exhibit. They constitute the central evidence around
which the entire exhibit is constructed.

Dr. Post captioned the photographs, and succeeded in delivering them
to the American Embassy in Constantinople, the Ottoman capital, from
where they were sent by diplomatic pouch to Washington, DC. They might
have been the very first images of the Armenian Genocide to arrive
into the hands of U.S. officials. In this regard, the historic value
of Dr. Post’s photographs are matched only by those taken by U.S.

consul Leslie Davis who documented the Armenian Genocide in the region
of Harput/Kharpert.

Because of the numbers of Armenians being deported and the pace at
which the western Anatolian cities were emptied of their Armenian
inhabitants, the Konya train station became a choke point in the
deportation process. Vast concentration camps of homeless Armenian
families soon formed along the tracks. The brutality of the process,
the complete lack of sanitation, and the absence of sources of food
very rapidly created an explosive situation threatening the spread of
epidemics. Thousands of Armenians never made it beyond the stations
of the Konya line and conditions in the refugee camps were so foul
and violent that a train conductor is quoted by Dr. Dodd describing
the Bozanti station as “hell on earth.”

Consisting of 121 images, 7 maps, and containing a rich variety of
eyewitness testimony, the exhibit reconstructs Armenian life in Zeytun,
reproduces the two rare photographs showing the arrest of the Zeytun
men, outlines the deportation route to the degree that contemporary
photographs allow, depicts the city of Konya, showing the contrast
between the rugged mountains in which Zeytun Armenians were accustomed
to living and the flat, arid, and sparsely populated plain of Konya.

The exhibit includes previously unpublished photographs of Zeytun,
reproduces newly released images from German sources, and, in addition
to the United States National Archives material, presents images
from the Australian War Memorial; University of Newcastle upon Tyne,
England, Gertrude Bell Archives; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
Kelsey Museum; Mennonite Church USA Archives; the Armenian Missionary
Association of America and the Haigazian University Archives of Beirut,
Lebanon; Library of Congress; Republic of Armenia National Archives;
as well as online resources and private individuals.

ANI especially recognizes the historian Aram Arkun whose close study
of documentary sources addressed the complex situation surrounding
the denouement in Zeytun and who served as project consultant for the
exhibit. ANI also thanks Gunter Hartnagel, a professional photographer,
who provided valuable guidance on German historical images, and whose
researches in historical geography helped understand the terrain
that was covered by the Zeytun deportees and appreciate the hardships
endured by those who trudged through the mountains of Cilicia at the
point of a bayonet.

The location of Konya on the train line also helped to document
the post-war situation in the city. Accompanying a U.S. aid mission
and relief workers, the American photographer George Robert Swain
recorded the efforts of Miss Cushman to create a safe haven for
surviving Armenian orphans. In so doing Swain added another layer of
documentation about the fate of the Armenian population and helped
create, in sum with Dr. Post’s pictures, one of the more comprehensive
photographic records of a single location so directly impacted by
the Armenian Genocide.

The final demise of the Armenians of Konya was sealed with the
fate of Dr. Armenag Haigazian who, as a highly-regarded educator,
embodied the Armenian Protestant community’s hope of recovery. He
had survived the war years and the violence of the Young Turk regime,
but his restoration of the Apostolic Institute made him the target of
the Turkish Nationalist movement, which saw to the shuttering of the
school and the second exile and persecution of Dr. Haigazian. World
War I may have ended and the Young Turk government overthrown, but
the Armenian Genocide in Turkey continued, making the death of Dr.

Haigazian a most poignant tragedy, especially as he famously held a
doctorate from Yale University.

This third digital exhibit continues and builds upon the themes
developed in the exhibits released earlier, including the role and
fate of Armenian clergy, churches and schools, the role of American
missionaries and relief workers, and the role of Germans in Ottoman
Turkey, while distinguishing between the attitudes of civilian,
military, and diplomatic representatives.

The exhibit highlights the unsolvable dilemma faced by the Armenian
Catholicos of Cilicia Sahag II Khabayan, who, unaware of the broader
scheme about to be implemented by the Young Turk regime, advised the
Zeytun population to cooperate with the authorities in the hope of
avoiding a repetition of the Cilician massacres that spread terror
across the region a mere six years earlier. The acts and observations
of other clergymen, including Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople
Zaven Der Yeghiayan, his successor Archbishop Mesrob Naroyan,
Archbishop Stepannos Hovagimian of Ismit, Grigoris Balakian, and
Reverend William Peet, are also explained as part of the testimony
on this specific aspect of the Armenian Genocide.

The exhibit also highlights the role of an exceptional Ottoman
official, who, as governor of Aleppo and of Konya, opposed the
measures of the Young Turk radicals. Jelal Bey was the highest ranking
administrator in the Ottoman Empire who disapproved of the policies
of the triumvirate ruling from Constantinople. A number of lower
ranking officials who disagreed with the regime were killed by Young
Turk party henchmen. Opposing the Young Turk regime required courage,
and Jelal placed his life in jeopardy. He may have been spared only
because of his stature and lifelong service to the state.

The exhibit also reveals the involvement of a German diplomat, who as
an embassy councilor in Constantinople played a role in maintaining
German-Turkish relations, and as such became among the recipients
of the flow of information being reported about the implementation
of the Armenian Genocide. A lesser official at the time, Konstantin
von Neurath rose through the ranks eventually to serve as Minister
of Foreign Affairs in Nazi Germany and as governor of occupied
Czechoslovakia, where Reinhard Heydrich, one of the architects of
the Holocaust, served as his deputy.

The exhibit concludes with testimony from Dr. Charles Mahjoubian,
a native of Konya who resettled in Philadelphia and entered the
profession of dentistry. As a survivor, he committed himself to
testifying to the events he witnessed in his hometown. He pointed with
pride to his birthplace as one of the earliest centers of Christianity,
dating to St. Paul preaching in Iconium (ancient name of Konya), and as
a center of Turkish Islam where religious piety restrained the hand of
the local population, in sharp relief to the political fanaticism of
the Young Turk regime and the brutality of its associates. According
to Mahjoubian, by a strict reading of the banishment legislation,
Jelal Bey succeeded for a brief while in delaying the deportation of
Catholic and Protestant Armenians.

“The First Deportation: the German Railway, the American Hospital,
and the Armenian Genocide” strengthens and clarifies the photographic
documentation of the Armenian Genocide in a manner consistent and
supportive of third party records, eyewitness accounts and survivor
testimony. It expands the scope of the evidence and attests to the
horrors that unfolded in 1915.

“It did not escape contemporaries that there were immediate lessons
to be drawn from the example of Zeytun,” observed Van Z. Krikorian,
ANI chairman. “Other communities grasped the methods by which the Young
Turk regime pressurized local politics and aggravated relations among
religious and ethnic groups in order to create conditions to justify
the wholesale depopulation of Armenian towns and cities. Reverend
Ephraim Jernazian drew a direct connection between the failure of
the Zeytun Armenians to stand their ground and the heroic defense of
their neighborhood by Urfa Armenians. Hopeless as their actions might
have been at the time, the Armenians of Urfa made the point that they
would not be submitting to tyranny willingly, nor give up their lives
easily to help fulfill the violent designs of the Young Turks.”

“The clarity of that lesson from the past resonates today with the
necessary defense of Nagorno Karabakh where Armenians yet again
a century later face another enemy whose objective remains their
expulsion from their homeland. The commitment of the Armenians of
Artsakh to avoid the fate of the Western Armenian population was
inspired by the tragedies of the Armenian Genocide and the pledge of
survivors to avoid a repeat of such a calamity,” concluded Krikorian.

“I want to thank Rouben Adalian for uncovering these valuable records
on the Armenian Genocide, and Joe Piatt and Aline Maksoudian for
working with Dr. Adalian in creating this impressive exhibit,”
Krikorian added.

“Relief workers, educators, missionaries, orphanage administrators,
and other volunteers from the United States played a massive role in
relieving the plight of the survivors,” stated ANI Director, Dr.

Rouben Adalian. “Many of the longtime American residents of Turkey
also witnessed and reported the deportations and massacres of 1915.

Because of the remoteness of Konya from the other major centers of the
Armenian Genocide, Dr. Wilfred Post, Dr. William Dodd, and Miss Emma
Cushman may not have been extended the recognition they deserve. The
compelling evidence of this exhibit now ranks them among the heroic
Americans who helped save lives during the Armenian Genocide.”

http://www.armradio.am/en/2015/02/03/third-digital-exhibit-on-armenian-genocide-released/

Armenia Cannot Revise Relations With Russia As Long As Turkish Facto

ARMENIA CANNOT REVISE RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA AS LONG AS TURKISH FACTOR EXISTS

13:54 * 03.02.15

Armenia has very few opportunities for maneuvering as long as the
current geopolitical conditions and Turkey’s factor remain, and the
Stratfor is well aware of that, political scientist Levon Shirinyan
told Tert.am as he commented on the latest report by Stratfor.

According to the report, Armenia and Belarus, Russia’s loyal allies,
will revise their relations with Moscow.

“I think that it is only Stratfor that is better informed that I am.

Regrettably, as long as the Turkish factor and the possibility of
closer Russian-Turkish relations exist, our possibilities are limited.

And this situation has lasted for more than 100 years,” Mr Shirinyan
said.

The Stratfor report is based on Belarusian President Alexander
Lukashenko’s statement that did not rule out the country’s secession
from the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) if the agreements would not be
honored. As to Armenia, it shows growing discontent with the conflict
with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh, with Russia playing a key role.

“I predicted nuclear blackmail, and history has shown the real
essence of so-called ‘Russian will.’ they destroy everything to
achieve their aims.”

Mr Shirinyan advises continuing multi-vector relations with Russia
and Azerbaijan to seek security guarantees.

The West does not give Armenia any security guarantees.

“So we should be most prudent, without coming into conflict with
anyone, and word with Russia.”

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2015/02/03/levon-shirinyan/1577874