Yerevan can one-sidedly quit Karabakh talks

PanARMENIAN.Net

Yerevan can one-sidedly quit Karabakh talks
11.05.2007 15:28 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ `The Azeri side breaches diplomatic ethics and it’s
almost senseless to speak of progress in the Nagorno Karabakh
negotiation process. Under such conditions continuation of talks is
practically impossible,’ Ruben Safrastyan, Director of the Institute
of Oriental Studies at the RA National Academy of Sciences of Armenia,
told a news conference in Yerevan.

Armenia can one-sidedly quit the Karabakh talks, according to him. `We
can do it, since there are all essential prerequisites. The first is
Azerbaijan’s non-constructive attitude towards the peaceful process,’
he said.

Mr Safrastyan also noted that the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs exert
pressure on the sides and hurry them for an agreement. Armenia cannot
assent to it.

BAKU: OSCE Co-Chairs to visit the region before Chairman-in-Office

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
May 11 2007

OSCE Co-Chairs to visit the region before Chairman-in-Office

[ 11 May 2007 20:33 ]

OSCE Minsk Group co-Chairs Matthew Bryza (US), Bernard Fassier
(France), Yuri Merzlyakov and Personal Representative of OSCE
Chairman-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk today met with Armenian Foreign
Minister Vardan Oskanyan, APA reports quoting PanARMENIAN.

They exchanged views on the principles of the settlement of the
Nagorno Karabakh conflict. The sides also discussed OSCE
Chairman-in-Office Miguel Angel Moratinos’s visit to the region on
June 4-5.
The Co-Chairs are expected to visit the region before the OSCE
Chairman-in-Office.
Armenian and Azerbaijani Foreign Ministers will meet after that. The
planned meeting of Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents on June 8-10
in St. Petersburg will depend on the results of these visits.
The Co-Chairs yesterday met with Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov. /APA/

La petite fiancee de l’Armenie; Karine Arabian

L’Express , France
10 mai 2007

La petite fiancée de l’Arménie; Karine Arabian

par Quilleriet Anne-Laure

Le musée de la Mode de Marseille donne carte blanche à cette
petite-fille de bottier qui, depuis 2000, s’impose à pas de velours
dans l’univers de l’accessoire. Rencontre dans son atelier parisien.

C’est une rue qui lui va bien, la rue Papillon, cette artère
tranquille du IXe arrondissement où elle a installé en 2000 sa
boutique et son atelier, loin des parcours fléchés du luxe parisien.
C’est là que cette fille de tailleurs arméniens, élevée à Villejuif,
dessine des collections d’accessoires de plus en plus remarquées, qui
mêlent candeur et impertinence, féminité rétro et jeux de lignes…
Un cocktail à l’image de cette pétillante brune de 39 ans, nourrie
par sa passion pour le rock, son goût de la fête comme par ses
voyages en Arménie, le pays de ses grands-parents, découvert en 1999.
Depuis, elle n’a cessé d’y faire des allers-retours. Elle a même
présenté un défilé remarqué à Erevan, en octobre 2006, avant d’être
choisie comme le chef de file des créateurs arméniens, dans le cadre
d’une exposition qui débute le 16 mai à Marseille.

Comment avez-vous abordé la culture de ce pays, que vous avez visité
pour la première fois à 30 ans passés?

Le but, c’est de parler de l’Arménie autrement, d’une façon moins
larmoyante et plus tournée vers l’avenir. On est néanmoins remonté au
XVIIe siècle pour rappeler que les Arméniens ont introduit en Europe
des tissus ou des teintures comme la garance. Puis l’on évoque le
parcours d’artisans qui se sont illustrés en France dans des
entreprises de chaussures, de broderie ou de tricotage, en mettant
l’accent sur de grandes réussites: Alain Manoukian, Stephane Kélian,
Alain Mikli ou d’autres, moins connus, comme Der Balian, qui
chaussait Greta Garbo… Pour l’étage qui m’est consacré, j’ai voulu
expliquer le processus créatif des collections.

Quelle vision de l’Arménie aviez-vous, enfant?

Même si mes grands-parents ont toujours parlé arménien, c’était
abstrait et inaccessible, comme un pays qui n’existait pas, tellement
le drame du génocide était enfoui sous les non-dits. Mon grand-père
maternel n’a jamais raconté sa véritable histoire, il a masqué toutes
ses douleurs sous l’humour. Du côté de ma grand-mère paternelle, j’ai
perçu des choses terribles par bribes.

Qu’est ce qui a déclenché le désir de redécouvrir vos racines?

Le vrai déclencheur a été mon cousin Dan (avec qui j’ai fondé ma
marque), qui est parti donner des cours là-bas dès 1991. Je me suis
demandé comment, moi aussi, je pouvais être utile à ce pays. Et, en
1999, il y a eu le premier voyage avec mes parents, un vrai choc. J’y
reviens régulièrement depuis.

Avez-vous eu envie d’inclure les savoir-faire arméniens dans vos
créations d’accessoires?

Je l’ai fait en 2003 dans la collection Minérale, avec des pierres et
des bois locaux. En ce moment, je travaille avec des Arméniens
installés à Beyrouth sur une mini-série de souliers et de bijoux en
fils d’or et un sac en obsidienne baptisé Alchimia. Au-delà de ce
choix de matières premières, j’ai voulu exprimer un mélange de dureté
et de richesse intérieure en intégrant différentes réflexions: sur la
femme orientale, les formes géométriques des monuments soviétiques…

Dans votre carte blanche, on retrouve le cinéaste Sergueï Paradjanov
et le parfumeur Francis Kurkdjian.

Avant de découvrir l’Arménie, je connaissais déjà l’oeuvre de
Paradjanov. On a consacré un espace à ses collages et à ses costumes.
Pour moi, il est tout à la fois un symbole de créativité, de folie et
d’indépendance. Même en prison, sous le régime soviétique, il s’est
battu en restant libre et flamboyant. Quant à Francis Kurkdjian,
créateur de l’ambiance olfactive d’une partie de l’exposition, on
s’est retrouvés autour d’une certaine idée du luxe et d’une Arménie
tournée vers l’avenir.

L’accessoire est-il pour vous un moyen d’expression plus naturel que
le vêtement?

J’ai commencé par faire des bijoux dans une chambre de bonne; je les
ai présentés au Festival de la mode de Hyères, en 1993, et j’ai
continué en travaillant pour Swarovski puis Chanel pendant deux ans,
où j’ai dessiné peu à peu des sacs et des chaussures. Même si je suis
née dans le vêtement, j’étais paralysée par des références
inaccessibles comme Azzedine Alaïa et je ne me sentais pas à la
hauteur pour me lancer.

Vous avez présenté un défilé à Erevan en octobre; avez-vous désormais
l’intention de développer une ligne de prêt-à-porter?

Mon objectif est d’arriver à monter une vraie maison de mode. Pour
l’instant, je construis chaque saison une minicollection. C’est mon
dernier bastion de liberté, car il n’y a pas encore d’impératif de
ventes. Au début, je voulais que le vêtement soit une prolongation
des accessoires, mais c’est un créneau qui enferme vite. Je cherche
en ce moment le bon partenaire pour la fabrication, et ce sera sans
doute le point de départ pour dessiner de véritables collections.

Vous mettez souvent en avant le fait d’être une femme dans votre
rapport à la création…

C’est d’autant plus déterminant dans le milieu de la chaussure, qui
est un domaine ultramasculin. Les hommes ont tendance à en rajouter
dans le fantasme, en oubliant que les souliers sont faits pour
marcher. Le choix d’une chaussure a des conséquences sur le corps et
sur l’humeur. Je cherche donc que les femmes se sentent bien, sans
négliger la séduction.

Vous avez construit votre maison en douceur. Ne vous sentez-vous pas
décalée dans un milieu qui fait et défait des carrières à une vitesse
éclair?

C’est un milieu qui éblouit, mais qui peut générer beaucoup de
frustrations. J’ai appris à me préserver. Depuis l’école, j’ai vu
plein de copains qui sont montés en flèche avant de redescendre aussi
vite. J’ai préféré asseoir un style sur le long terme. En 2000,
personne ne m’attendait avec mes souliers à bouts ronds et petits
talons, à l’encontre des talons aiguilles, ultrasexy. Je me sens
atypique dans un système compartimenté entre une branchitude extrême,
qui n’est plus de mon ge, et des grands groupes qui jouent aux
chaises musicales avec les stylistes. Je me reconnais plus dans la
liberté des créateurs des années 1980. Un peu old school en somme,
mais avec des notions de marketing des années 2000!

Ruben Safrastian: Under Conditions Of Expected Developments Compleme

RUBEN SAFRASTIAN: UNDER CONDITIONS OF EXPECTED DEVELOPMENTS COMPLEMENTARIANISM WILL NOT ENSURE FULFILMENT OF ARMENIA’S GOALS

Noyan Tapan
May 11 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 11, NOYAN TAPAN. Serious challenges connected with world
and regional developments of coming years are awaited for Armenia,
and for resisting them country’s foreign policy should be more exact
and coordinated. Ruben Safrastian, Director of Institute of Oriental
Studies of RA National Academy of Sciences, expressed such opinion
at the May 11 press conference.

In his words, the hopes of the West to see the South Caucasian
region as a united geopolitical pole did not come true, to which
Turkey greatly contributed. Turkey had not managed to make Georgia
its faithful ally by now, while the situation is changing at present:
for the present, we mean economic cooperation, but in the future it
can turn into political, maybe also military alliance.

R. Safrastian attached importance to NATO’s becoming more active
in the region. In his words, as a result of close cooperation with
U.S. Georgia can soon receive a status of candidate for membership to
NATO, which will also change the situation in the region. Besides,
U.S. policy in relation to Iran can result in military operations,
which will have grave consequences for the whole region.

As the expert affirmed, under these conditions complementarianism
cannot ensure fulfilment of Armenia’s goals and the country should
carry on more balanced foreign policy. Considering as primary
fulfilment of national goals, R. Safrastian at the same time gave
assurance that Armenia’s strategic relations with Russia have no
alternative.

Small Explosion In Beirut

SMALL EXPLOSION IN BEIRUT

Agence France Presse — English
May 9, 2007 Wednesday 6:54 AM GMT

A small explosion occurred on Wednesday in a Christian neighbourhood
of Beirut, inflicting neither damage nor casualties, police said.

"There was a small explosion in an open field near the Armenian
cemetery in Tahwita," in the eastern sector of Beirut, a senior police
officer told AFP.

"It inflicted no damage or casualties," he said.

"Experts are now trying to determine what kind of explosion it is,"
he added.

Turkey’s Army And The West’s Hypocrisy

TURKEY’S ARMY AND THE WEST’S HYPOCRISY
Rageh Omaar

New Statesman, UK
May 10 2007

Listen RSS A spontaneous demonstration in favour of secularism in
Turkey was hailed as a beacon of hope but the reality is much more
complicated

It was, without doubt, an impressive demonstration of people power,
in a country on the edge of Europe that seeks to become a part of it.

Almost a million Turks marched in Istanbul to show support for their
secular republic. In an age when many in liberal, secular democracies
in the west fear what they perceive as the relentless rise of militant
political Islam, the sight of a spontaneous and authentic demonstration
in a Muslim country was hailed as a beacon of hope. If only things
were so simple. It would make a great script for a Hollywood movie.

The reality is more complicated. The demonstration was not in response
to the imminent election of an Islamist government sworn to enact
conservative religious laws. It was in response to the last-minute
nomination of a venerated politician, Abdullah Gu, to the largely
ceremonial role of president. The protest forced him to step down. Gu,
who had been the country’s foreign minister and played a significant
role in Turkey’s negotiations over membership of the European Union,
had always had his eyes set on being prime minister.

But the incumbent prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, put Gu’s name
forward as a presidential candidate.

What was so wrong with that? Gu belongs to the Justice and Development
Party (AKP), a Muslim democratic party, but it is a million miles from
what we would normally understand as "Islamist": guided by clerics,
aiming to enact and enforce religious laws. This is not what the AKP
is about, and certainly not a reflection of Gu’s career. Analysts in
Turkey and the EU have praised the government of which he was a senior
member for enacting the most liberal reforms Turkey has experienced,
in both the economic and the social spheres.

However, Turkey is a country with shifting identities; Muslim and
European, part of the Middle East yet one of Israel’s strongest
military allies, Kurdish and Turkish, democratic yet beholden to
the military. These contradictory voices cannot project fully in a
monolithic system where there is one identity – secularism – and one
arbiter of political power – the army.

Impressive as the demonstration in Istanbul was, it was the voice of
the country’s urban and middle-class elite.

Gu’s party represents a dying political trend in Muslim countries
worldwide. Like similar parties in Algeria, Pakistan, Jordan and Egypt,
the AKP is capitalising on disaffection with political systems that
have monopolised power, whether it is the army in Turkey and Pakistan,
or family dynasties such as the Assads in Syria and the Mubaraks
in Egypt. The emergence of these political parties that appeal to
professional and democratic Muslims has been perceived as a threat
to stability, and they have been prevented repeatedly from competing
fairly in elections – through vote-rigging, military intervention,
imprisonment and intimidation.

The annulment of the polls that brought the Islamic Salvation Front to
power in Algeria in the mid-1990s by the intervention of the army is a
warning of what happens when moderate, democratically elected Muslim
parties are prevented from taking office. By the most conservative
estimates, the ensuing decade-long civil war left at least 60,000
people dead.

There is a nauseating hypocrisy to the way liberals in the west have
applauded the army’s intervention in Turkey. This is the same army
that the left has criticised for decades for its policies towards the
Kurds; the same army it has condemned for its unwillingness to admit
to the Armenian genocide or permit it to be discussed. The west may
be reassured by the army’s actions, but divisions within Turkey will
deepen, and with this crackdown, another country joins the list of
those where moderate Muslims have no voice.

Comments can be sent at

http://www.newstatesman.com/200705140019

ROUNDUP: Poll: Strong Support For UN To Fight Terrorism, Genocide

ROUNDUP: POLL: STRONG SUPPORT FOR UN TO FIGHT TERRORISM, GENOCIDE

Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Germany
May 10, 2007 Thursday 2:07 AM EST

DPA POLITICS UN Terrorism ROUNDUP: Poll: Strong support for UN to
fight terrorism, genocide Embargo expired New York

A majority of people in a recent multinational survey support giving
the UN Security Council more authority to use force to prevent
nuclear proliferation, terrorist attacks and genocide, according to
a 19-country poll released Thursday.

The poll was conducted by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and
the Washington-based WorldPublicOpinion.org in countries constituting
half of the world population of 6.7 billion.

The response indicated large majorities or pluralities in all
countries, with strong support for a major UN role in volatile
international issues from people surveyed in China (67 per cent),
France (84 per cent), the US (76 per cent), Israel (85 per cent),
Russia (65 per cent), Ireland (71 per cent) and South Korea (61
per cent).

Despite support for UN action against threats like nuclear weapons
and terrorism, those surveyed opposed UN decisions that go against
their own national interests.

"Despite well-publicized disagreements over the role of the UN in
world affairs, this survey clearly shows that international public
opinion has coalesced around the notion that the UN should be the
vehicle for conflict resolution and international cooperation on
a wide variety of pressing problems," said Christopher Whitney,
executive director for studies at the Chicago council.

Steven Kull, editor of the Washington group, said: "While leaders of
nation-states may be wary of giving the UN more power, it is clear

that publics around the world are comfortable with the idea of a
stronger UN."

Kull, who was at UN headquarters in New York to launch the survey,
said that questionnaires were submitted from June 2006 to March 2007,
but not all questions were asked in all countries. He said that other
public-opinion groups contributed to the survey.

China, India, the United States, Russia, France, Thailand, Ukraine,
Poland, Iran, Mexico, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia,
Argentina, Peru, Armenia, Israel and the Palestinian territories were
among those polled.

The poll said that 72 per cent of those polled in the US support
a standing UN peacekeeping force to deal with issues of terrorism,
nuclear weapons and genocide. The force should be trained, selected
and commanded by the United Nations, the poll said. Support in France
was 77 per cent and Peru 77 per cent.

Countries polled gave on average 55-per-cent support for the UN to
regulate the international arms trade.

The UN received higher support to investigate human-rights violations:
France (92 per cent), US (75 per cent), Peru (75 per cent) and South
Korea (74 per cent).

Citizens Can’t Keep Silence Any More

CITIZENS CAN’T KEEP SILENCE ANYMORE

A1+
[06:53 pm] 10 May, 2007

"Yesterday’s events showed that authorities’ actions are getting out
of control and the situation is deteriorating", said Suren Surenyants,
a member of Political Committee of Republic Party. He witnessed the
conflict between the police and the meeting participants. According to
him, a sector of civilians has formed in Armenia and it is impossible
to make them keep silence by applying repressive methods because they
fight is not for a piece of bread but for freedom".

"I think Robert Kocharyan will be informed that regardless of the fact
that the police had applied power towards people however no single
person left the square", said Surenyants. Suren Surenyants assures
that he will continue his mission of liberating the country from the
subdued government. He thinks that the elections have already been
faked and our goal is to hold new elections. He mentions that their
party will participate in elections on May 12 and the next day their
party will meet with people the square to discuss their further plans.

Non-Tax Revenues Of Ra State Budget Increase 2.6fold In First Quarte

NON-TAX REVENUES OF RA STATE BUDGET INCREASE 2.6FOLD IN FIRST QUARTER OF 2007 ON SAME PERIOD OF LAST YEAR

Noyan Tapan
May 09 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 9, NOYAN TAPAN. In January-March 2007, non-tax revenues
of the RA state budget made 11.6 bln drams (about 32.3 mln USD),
as a result of which the quarterly program was fulfilled by 207.4%
and the index of the same period of 2006 was exceeded 2.6fold.

According to data of the RA Ministry of Finance and Economy, the growth
in non-tax revenues was mainly conditioned by payment of 4 bln 613 mln
drams under the reconciliation agreement signed between ArmenTel CJSC
and the Armenian government, as well as by an increase in interest
payments received from placement of available resources. Their amount
made 771.5 mln drams, exceeding by 740 mln drams the index of the
first quarter of 2006.

Besides, a growth in non-tax revenues was also registered with
respect to revenues from lease of state institutions and property
(except for land) – (a growth by 39.1% or 18.4 mln drams), interest
paid by residents for the use of state loans (a growth of 32.7% or 34
mln drams), as well as with respect to revenues from penalties used
by executive and court bodies for various offences (a growth of 24.7%
or 98.2 mln drams).

A decline in non-tax revenues compared with the same period of last
year was registered with respect to monetary resources transferred
to the state as donation, and revenues from alienation of property
not representing fixed assets or material assets, which amounted to
29.8 mln drams, which was less by 597.2 mln drams than the respective
index of last year. This is due to the fact that donation of 511 mln
drams was made to the Armenian government by Armenia – International
Airports CJSC for servicing the EBRD credit program of Zvartnots cargo
complex. Without this sum, the decline in the indicated revenues made
74.3% or 86.3 mln drams.

Hayko Cannot Win At Eurovision Contest

HAYKO CANNOT WIN AT EUROVISION CONTEST

A1+
[12:29 pm] 08 May, 2007

International bookmaker organizations began doing stakes on winner at
Eurovision 2007. Hayko is presenting present Armenia at the contest
this year.

Specialists think that Hayko isn’t likely to win and bookmakers have
specified nominal coefficient (50) the singer. However the bookmakers
have not taken into account the fact that Hayko is going perform his
song at the finals.

Bookmakers consider Switzerland a favorite and for the latter they
have set 4.70 coefficient. The representatives of Sweden, Belarus,
Serbia, Bulgaria, Cyprus and Russia have big chances to win.

The semi-finals of Eurovision 2007 will be held on May 10 and the
finals on May 12.