90 years Turks learnt to deny Armenian Genocide

news.am, Armenia
March 27 2010

90 years Turks learnt to deny Armenian Genocide

13:30 / 03/27/2010 Turkish Premier Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s words `show
that the he has no sensitivity on the subject matter,’ reads the
article by Cengiz Aktar in Turkish Hurriyet Daily News. The author
comments on Erdogan’s explanations about his statement on deportation
of 100.000 illegal Armenians. Aktar notes that Armenians lived in
Anatolia even before Turks, adding that within 90 years Turks
(including Erdogan) were taught to deny killing of Anatolian
Armenians.

`No matter how you name it, this is not normal. So if nobody knows
anything today, it is in a way understandable, however unacceptable,’
he reckons.

According to the author, the word `illegal’ stirred up debates inside
and outside Turkey as presently the migration is a topical issue,
particularly in western countries. This subject is studied at various
universities, including those in Europe. `Almost every day a dramatic
story about illegal workers, including those from Turkey, are covered
in Western newspapers,’ he added. Thus, Aktar regrets that Turkish
Premier is unaware of it and `rudely talks on the BBC radio about the
arbitrary practices of his own country.’

SDHP Stamp Issue in Court

SDHP STAMP ISSUE IN COURT

13:40:39 – 25/03/2010
ahos17292.html

The topic of the SDHP split is again in the center of the attention in
connection with the trial to be held on April 1 where the SDHP leader
Lyudmila Sargsyan’s being the party leader will be decided as well as
the issue of the party’s stamp.

A SDHP member, supporter of Lyudmila Sargsyan, former deputy minister
of National Security Gurgen Yeghiazaryan said in this connection that
during a session of the party, last September, he was asked not to
participate because the question of leaving the opposition and joining
the government was to be discussed. The couple Sedrak Ajemyan and
Vardan Khachatyran did not manage to reach their goal. Afterwards, by
the description of Gurgen Yeghiazaryan, they formed a cooperative
structure and appealed to the court.

Yeghiazaryan, unlike Lyudmila Sargsyan, is not an optimist and thinks
the court decision will not be in their favor.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-lr

President’s proposal to sign agreement on non-use of force shows…

Armenian President’s proposal to sign an agreement on non-use of force
once more showed the world who is threatening regional peace

2010-03-26 16:49:00

Interview of Masis Mailyan, Chairman of Foreign Policy and Security
Public Council, ex-deputy foreign minister of the Nagorny Karabakh
Republic, with ArmInfo news agency

Mr. Mailyan, how perspective is further promotion of H.Res.252 on the
Armenian Genocide? And what do you expect from President Obama’s
traditional speech on April 24?

It is obvious that by affirming the Armenian Genocide resolutions, the
United States and some Western countries exert pressure on Turkey,
which is trying to evade implementing the assumed commitments on
normalization of relations with Armenia. Promotion of H.Res.252, as
well as making new decisions by the two countries’ parliaments and the
extent of sincerity of President Obama’s speech to be made on April 24
depend on how much adequate the Turkish leadership will behave. On the
other hand, taking into account the domestic processes in the Turkish
society and the situation in the Turkish army, considerable
intensification of the pressure on Ankara may lead to destabilization
of the situation. Therefore, further decisions on Turkey will be taken
with due regard for these and other circumstances. As regards
ratification of Armenian-Turkish Protocols, this topic cannot be
considered completely closed.

Baku is constantly stating about some mythical soon settlement of the
Karabakh conflict. Can one speak of any terms of settlement today and
how do you imagine this taking into account the current realities?

If we are stemming from the methodology of settlement applied by the
OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen, and as a result – the Madrid proposals
of the intermediaries, the negotiating positions of the parties, the
distorted negotiating format, we may say that in this form the
negotiating process and reaching compromise have no prospect. But in
case of new approaches application and changing of international
parameters of settlement, the conflict may be resolved in a short
period of time. Compromise is possible if Russia, the USA and EU
countries give new quality to Nagorny Karabakh settlement process via
recognition of the NKR statehood. Only then the parties will be able
to agree on peaceful and even kind neighborly relations on equal
conditions. Only using of the recent precedents of Kosovo, Abkhazia
and South Ossetia by the international community for resolving of the
Karabakh conflict may prevent a new war and will guarantee regional
security and create the needed conditions for reaching strong peace as
soon as possible.

In an interview with Euronews, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan
offered Baku to sign an agreement on non-use of force. In response,
Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry Spokesman Elkhan Polukhov said that Baku
is ready to sign the agreement on non-use of force only after
"deoccupation of the Azerbaijani territories’. How much does this
approach meet the renewed Madrid principles of the Karabakh peace
process, which rules out any use of force and is positively
characterized by Azerbaijan?

The Armenian President’s proposal to sign an agreement on non-use of
force once more showed the world who is threatening peace and security
in the region. Baku’s refusal showed that danger is actually not in
the existence of the conflict that does not hinder active development
of Azerbaijan and foreign investments in economy of that country, but
it is in the political ambitions of the Azerbaijani leadership. In
addition, Azerbaijan showed how easily it can neglect the commitments
it undertook when joining the UN, CSCE (OSCE) and the Council of
Europe. The basic documents of those commitments imply peaceful
resolution of disputes, non- use of force or threat of force. Even if
leave aside the NKR security problem, the territories fixed in the NKR
Constitution, etc., the talks about "de-occupation of the Azerbaijani
territories" or withdrawal of our troops beyond the line of the
"internationally recognized Azerbaijani borders" are inappropriate, as
these borders have not been determined at the international level.
Official Baku often makes reference to the international recognition
of the Republic of Azerbaijan within the "internationally recognized
borders", being voluntarily interpreted by it in its favor, that does
not meet the reality.

According to the world practice, the issue of territorial delimitation
among the neighboring states may be solved by the states themselves,
or these states may delegate the authorities on determination of
borders to a neutral mediator. A separate person, country, group of
countries or a special international conference may be a mediator.
Such issues in our regions are solved by the countries themselves.
Despite the fact the Republic of Azerbaijan was internationally
recognized for about 18 years, the process of delimitation and
demarcation of the Azerbaijani-Georgian border, Azerbaijani-Russian
border, Azerbaijani-Iranian sea border is still going on and
disputable sections remain with Turkmenistan in the water area of the
Caspian Sea. The process of determination of borders between
Azerbaijan and the NKR, Azerbaijan and Armenia did not start at all
because of the absence of diplomatic relations and an
intergovernmental commission on delimitation and demarcation of
interstate borders between these countries.

Ilham Aliyev has recently said that the main part of the negotiations
on the Karabakh conflict is over. Does this statement contain truth,
besides traditional populism?

The OSCE MG Co-Chairs stress that consultations between Armenia and
Azerbaijan as part of the Madrid process are conducted on the
principle of "nothing is agreed until everything is agreed’. Taking
into consideration the mutually exclusive and sometimes insulting
statements by officials from Baku and Yerevan, it is very difficult to
trust in the latest statement by Ilham Aliyev.

Interviewed by David Stepanyan, 26 March 2010, ArmInfo

RA Government Endorsed Iraqi Armenians’ Integration Concept

RA GOVERNMENT ENDORSED IRAQI ARMENIANS’ INTEGRATION CONCEPT

news.am, Armenia
March 25 2010

RA Government approved concept on integration of Iraqi Armenians in
Armenia at the March 25 sitting.

Concept refers to 750 Iraqi Armenians who left the country due to
intolerance towards Christians by extremists during the war, RA
Government press service informed NEWS.am.

RA Premier Tigran Sargsyan noted that all organizations should assist
smooth integration of these families into society.

Armenian community of Iraq presently totals 15.000 people residing
in Baghdad, Kirkuk, Basra and Mosul cities. At the rough estimate,
about 2.000-2.500 Armenians left Iraq since the hostilities in the
country aroused.

As many as 1.960 Christians were killed in Iraq in 2003-2009.

Presently, the number of Christians in Iraq is about 500 000.

BAKU: Nagorno Karabakh Will Never Be Independent, Ilham Aliyev

NAGORNO KARABAKH WILL NEVER BE INDEPENDENT, ILHAM ALIYEV

news.az
March 24 2010
Azerbaijan

President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev made a speech during festivities
on Novruz holiday.

The resolution of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno
Karabakh is the most important problem facing us. Definite steps
are taken in this direction and today Azerbaijan’s positions in the
negotiation process are much stronger. Certainly, our diplomatic
efforts have played their role in strengthening these positions.

Meanwhile, the processes of construction and development, ongoing
in Azerbaijan and consolidation of the country have strengthened
our positions in the negotiation process. Today we are the most
economically developed country of the region and our development
cannot be compared to the development of other countries.

All these factors consolidate our positions during negotiations
and we lay hope for the negotiation process, and we must
continue these efforts. Today we are on the decisive stage of
the conflict settlement. It is possible to say that the main part
of the negotiations has almost been completed. I can say that the
introduced proposals with some small exceptions ensure the interests of
Azerbaijan, its territorial integrity, return of all occupied regions
under Azerbaijan’s control. Thus, we consider that if the opposite
party demonstrates constructivism and agrees to the proposed variant,
we will further advance in the issue of the conflict settlement.

We have not stepped a bit back from our principal position in the
process of negotiations. We said this several years ago and we adhere
to the same position today. The territorial integrity of Azerbaijan
has never been a subject of discussion. The territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan must be restored. The occupational troops must be withdrawn
from all the occupied lands and the Azerbaijani citizens must return
there. All communications must open. Armenians and Azerbaijanis living
in Nagorno Karabakh who must return to Nagorno Karabakh must live
in conditions of high autonomy. The future that can happen either
tomorrow or in a hundred years or may never happen will show the
nature of this status.

This means that independence of Nagorno Karabakh beyond Azerbaijan
is absolutely unacceptable. This is our principal position. Nagorno
Karabakh will never be independent. Azerbaijan will never recognize
it. The world community will also not recognize the formation that
has not been recognized by us.

I think today there are good opportunities for the resolution of
the issue. Azerbaijan will intensify diplomatic efforts, it takes
a constructive position during negotiations and at the same time it
uses its potential to strengthen. This consolidation is observed in
the economic, political and military sphere. We do not conceal it. We
live in conditions of war. It is not by accident that a greater part
of our state expenses goes for defence. This is natural. There will be
no need for large defence costs after the Karabakh conflict is settled.

But today there is a strong need for that. We will raise our defence
costs every year, strengthen army, purchase new arms and do so that
the armed forces of Azerbaijan could fulfil the order of the Supreme
Commander within a short period of time and at any minute. This is
our sovereign right and we do not need advisers in this issue.

It has already been twenty years that we live in conditions
of independence. The first years of independence were hard and
complicated. We managed to attain the current realities merely through
our own efforts and by holding the policy of our great leader Heydar
Aliyev without any assistance and advises from outside. Thanks
to the progressive reforms both in political and economic sphere
Azerbaijan has already turned into a strong state. If we need advise,
we will appeal to whom we need. But there is no need for untimely
recommendations. Those who want to interfere with our internal
affairs should have understood long before that their efforts are in
vain and useless. There can be only one result here: the relations
between Azerbaijan and those who want to interfere with our internal
affairs may deteriorate. We are ready for any relations. We want to
build our relations with all countries on the basis of principles of
friendship, mutual respect and non-interference. We do not interfere
with anyone’s internal affairs, we do not criticize anyone, though
in some cases there are sufficient grounds for criticism. Certainly,
we expect the same attitude to us.

Therefore, I do not want the situation to worsen to the extend when
we were obliged to settle issues with someone in an extremely serious
and strained form.

On this remarkable day I would like to repeat that Azerbaijan follows
its own way. This is a way of democracy, development, progress,
freedom and sovereignty. We must follow this way together with our
friends. But we cannot follow this way with those who want to blacken
us or interfere with our affairs.

We rely on our own potential and we live well. And we will live even
better. Our current success is based on the will, determination and
talent of the Azerbaijani people. Today, on this great day, I would
like to say addressing to the Azerbaijani people that as a President of
the country I will continue the independent policy of Azerbaijan and
will never give up this way. We will further do everything possible
for the successful future of Azerbaijan.

ARF To RP

ARF TO RP

Lragir.am
22/03/10

March 22, reporters asked ARF parliamentary member Artsvik Minasyan
his opinion about the possibilities for Nagorno-Karabakh participation
in the NKR issue negotiation about which the OSCE Minsk group French
co-chair Bernard Fassier stated recently in Yerevan. Reporters asked
Artsvik Minasyan whether he agrees with the statement of a number
of governmental members as well as Fassier himself, that Karabakh
was pushed out of the negotiation process only "thanks" to Robert
Kocharyan’s efforts whom the ARF has supported for 10 years.

Artsvik Minasyan called the statement on the participation of Karabakh
opportunistic, but the Armenian side should continue to fight for
its participation, and Armenia is obliged to conclude a strategic
documentary alliance with Karabakh.

As for the "merits" of Kocharyan, Artsvik Minasyan believes this
is some kind of misunderstanding. ARF considers that in the sense
of protecting the rights of Karabakh, it is not eliminated from the
process. The point, says Minasyan, is about who should represent the
interests of Karabakh, and this role assumed Robert Kocharyan.

Minasyan reminded the ruling Republican Party once supported Robert
Kocharyan too, and very strange that they are trying to create the
impression that Karabakh is pushed out of the process because of
Kocharyan.

Azerbaijan In Fact Recognized

AZERBAIJAN IN FACT RECOGNIZED

rahos17236.html
10:56:54 – 22/03/2010

Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia Shavarsh Kocharyan
answered a "Mediamax" question in connection with a number of
statements of the Azerbaijani president.

"Mr. Aliyev announced another monologue about nonexistent dialogue.

According to the monologue, Azerbaijan essentially completed
negotiations with itself and something that it reached, in general,
is in the interests of Azerbaijan. However, with some exceptions,
perhaps, it cannot agree with itself", said Shavarsh Kocharyan.

Baku pretends not to understand the lack of any alternative to the
independence of Nagorno-Karabakh – either now or in hundred years,
or ever. Nagorno-Karabakh Republic took place in full accordance
with international law, the State, which managed to resist the policy
of ethnic cleansing and aggression of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan, being
forced to sign a truce with the Nagorno-Karabakh, in fact recognized
the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh in 1994", said Deputy Minister
of Foreign Affairs of Armenia.

According to Kocharyan, the statements of President Aliyev are direct
evidence of reluctance to engage in constructive dialogue to resolve
the conflict. Azerbaijan continues to inflate the bubble of illusions
arising from sitting on the oil needle, distortions of the nature of
the problem, the causes of conflict and the negotiation process.

Azerbaijan has the opportunity to withdraw its troops from the
occupied territories of Nagorno-Karabakh and to begin negotiations with
Nagorno Karabakh before this excessively bloated bubble of illusions,
distortions, and smug bragging bursts", said the Foreign Ministry
of Armenia.

Recall that Aliyev said that the settlement has entered a crucial
phase, and they hope that the conflict will be resolved within the
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-l

‘100 Steps’ Is Theoretical: Razmik Zohrabyan On Opposition’s Program

‘100 STEPS’ IS THEORETICAL: RAZMIK ZOHRABYAN ON OPPOSITION’S PROGRAM FOR REFORM

Tert.am
22.03.10

Republican Party of Armenia (HHK) has not held a special discussion
on ‘100 Steps,’ a program authored by former RA prime minister Hrant
Bagratyan, said HHK Deputy Chair Razmik Zohrabyan at a press conference
today, adding that he had, however, flipped through the document.

Zohrabyan said the program prepared by the opposition is a theoretical
one.

"At first glance, the program seems to be normal, but you cannot say
anything [sure] unless you put it into practice … As soon as they
[Armenian National Congress] assume leadership – I don’t know when
that’ll happen – they can implement their program," said Zohrabyan.

Asked whether he thought it possible that the opposition might return
to power, he said: "In a democratic country every political power
that gets public backing assumes authority. It is not excluded that
they can return to power. Elections are expected in two years, let
them try and we will see [what happens]," said Zohrabyan.

He also commented on a statement by the Armenian National Congress
on early elections, saying if the ANC wants to come into the
constitutional field it must do so through constitutional means.

Zohrabyan also said that there aren’t any threats to the Constitution.

On the other hand, according to Zohrabyan, the opposition has started
preparing for not extraordinary, but simply the next elections.

Oligarchs Took Out of Armenia as Much Money as The Budget Is

OLIGARCHS TOOK OUT OF ARMENIA AS MUCH MONEY AS THE BUDGET IS

Lragir.am
19/03/10

Representatives of the Armenian major business took out of Armenia
capital the amount of which is growing. On March 19, the Armenian
former Prime Minister Hrant Bagratyan stated about it. He said the
government does not make a step to correct the situation.

`The greater part of the oligarchs took out of Armenia serious
capital. A number, which is approaching the number coming from abroad.
In other words, the country borrows some money and gives it to the
citizens. The oligarchs import goods and sell them to people taking
the money in their hands. Then, they take that money abroad by buying
real estate’, says Hrant Bagratyan.

According to him, disaster for Armenia will start in 2013, when we
will need 500 million dollar in the budget to be able to pay the debt
off. Today we have a budget of 2, 5 billion, 500 million is more than
our expenditure for army, says Hrant Bagratyan. He adds that the
government makes mistakes even when borrowing.

In answer to reporters’ request to predict the exchange rate, Hrant
Bagratyan said that in case the government leaves the foreign currency
apart, the exchange will be 420-430. If they do not, this exchange
will be preserved for other two three months.

Azerbaijan: Pumping oil and gas

Azerbaijan: Pumping oil and gas

Azerbaijan, with its natural resources, is vital to easing Russia’s
grip on the EU’s energy – if new supply lines can get up and running.
Mark Leftly reports from the capital, Baku, on the power plays that
make this small country one of the most important in the world

Sunday, 21 March 2010
Independent/UK

A chill wind blows in from the Caspian Sea, bringing with it a faint
but distinctive stench of oil. At the front of the brutalist Dom
Soviet building, where once a statue of Lenin stood, the Azerbaijan
flag ripples in time with each passing gust.

Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, is booming: gross domestic product
growth was more than 9 per cent last year; the hundreds of big, shiny
commercial and residential buildings under construction are a result
of its oil and gas wealth. Prince Andrew has visited the city often
over the past six years, as he tries to promote British business
interests in the region.

The capital is also at the centre of one of the most important
geopolitical issues of modern times, the security of the European
Union’s energy supplies. Azerbaijan, with the BP-led Shah Deniz-2
field, is expected to be the major natural-gas supplier to the Nabucco
pipeline, which will run 3,300km from Erzurum, Turkey, to Austria.

Nabucco is strategically vital as it will ease Russia’s grip on the
supply of natural gas into Europe. More than half of the EU’s gas
supply comes from Russia, Norway and Algeria. The need for alternative
supplies intensified in 2009, when Gazprom, Russia’s state energy
company, cut off the gas to Ukraine on New Year’s Day, following a row
over price.

However, the Nabucco project, which is due to start construction next
year and deliver gas three years later, is besieged by problems over
cost projections, transit issues and even war.

In the Minister’s lair

Natiq Aliyev, Azerbaijan’s Industry and Energy Minister, stands by his
country’s flag in his ludicrously vast office in the Dom Soviet, now
also known as Government House. He immediately sets out the EU’s
difficulties: "Europe’s reserves of gas and oil in the North Sea
especially have declined. Maybe in 10, 20 years if Europe has no more
significant discoveries, the current reserves will be over."

The EU wants Nabucco, which has six shareholders including Germany’s
RWE and Hungary’s Mol, to provide 31bn cubic metres of gas. It is
estimated that the Shah Deniz field can only provide about a quarter
of this amount.

The success of the pipeline, then, will be based on the participation
of other gas-rich countries. "I think in a few years, when the Iran
and Iraq situation is more stable politically, we will be able to
implement the Nabucco project very speedily," says Aliyev, who is
clear that the current timetable cannot be met.

"I don’t think construction will be in one or two years. Countries
like Iraq, Iran and Turkmenistan need to join this project." The
project website admits that it would like to source gas from Iran "at
a later point in time", while "it remains to be seen if also gas from
Iraq will be linked with the Nabucco pipeline system".

Richard Morningstar, the US State Department’s special envoy for
Eurasian energy, seemed to rule out Iran’s potential involvement last
year, the argument over the Middle Eastern state’s nuclear programme
still too fierce. Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, has
expressed interest in supplying gas.

One big hurdle was cleared last year when an intergovernmental
agreement was signed in Ankara between Turkey and EU member states.
The Turkish parliament recently ratified the document, which provides
a legal framework for the construction and operation of the pipeline.

"It was a positive step … not the last step," argues Aliyev. "We
don’t know yet who the territory [on which the pipeline runs] belongs
to – are they government territories, the private sector’s?" Aliyev
points to the complexity of land negotiations for the shorter
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. There were more than 1,000 landowners,
including farmers and government bodies, involved in Azerbaijan alone.

There have also been disagreements between Azerbaijan and Turkey, some
of which are politically motivated. Turkey’s relations with Armenia
have started to thaw, angering an Azerbaijan that is still formally at
war with its neighbour over the disputed (and Armenian controlled)
Nagorno-Karabakh region.

More directly, there is still some dispute over how much it will cost
Azerbaijan to transit gas through Turkey. Taner Yildiz, Turkey’s
Energy Minister, did say earlier this month that his government had
offered Azerbaijan transit fees at lower than market price, though the
government in Baku remains unconvinced.

"How are we going to supply Nabucco if we have no right of transit in
Turkey?" asks Aliyev, rhetorically.

Socar to go

Elshad Nassirov, the vice-president of the State Oil Company of
Azerbaijan (Socar), is also a senior official of the country’s
football federation.

He smiles that it was his decision to commission the 3.5 metre bronze
statue of Tofik Bakhramov, the Azerbaijani linesman who allowed Geoff
Hurst’s dubious second goal in the 1966 World Cup final, which now
stands outside the national stadium.

The statue was partly a humorous gesture, built when England were
drawn in the same 2006 World Cup qualifying group as Azerbaijan.
However, this sense of humour has brought Nassirov all sorts of
problems.

He joked at a conference last year that Azerbaijan could always send
its gas east to China if the EU did not want it. Technically, this
would require only a 180km pipeline across the Caspian Sea to
Turkmenistan. But Nassirov insists that he was simply teasing his
audience and not making a veiled threat. "For us, the priority is the
European market," he says. "The very best thing about the European
market is that it is a free market price, not dependent on a decision
in Brussels."

Nassirov giggles that he didn’t expect his joke to "ignite so many
furious responses". However, the misinterpretation of his aside only
goes to show just how worried European states are about where they get
their gas from.

He points out that there are options for the EU besides Nabucco: the
520km Trans Adriatic pipeline, connecting Greece and Italy, and the
$2.8bn Turkey-Greece-Italy scheme.

"They are cheaper, that’s the positive side," says Nassirov. "The
negative side is that they lack the EU support of Nabucco and their
markets are not as diverse as Nabucco."

The EU does seem committed to the Nabucco project, but it will have to
ensure Azerbaijan’s support if it is to be more than a dry, empty
pipeline.

Once again, this small country of nine million people finds itself one
of the most important places on Earth. Truly the mecca of the energy
industry, it was in Baku that the world’s first oil well was drilled
in 1848.

The second oil boom of the post-Soviet period has already given the
country extraordinary wealth, the state oil fund having nearly $11bn
of assets.

And now Azerbaijan is gaining political might, Baku’s decisions are
affecting the energy security of almost an entire continent.