Azerbaijan Objects To Armenian Acquisition Of European Missiles

EurasiaNet.org, NY
July 14 2013

Azerbaijan Objects To Armenian Acquisition Of European Missiles

July 14, 2013 – 9:30am, by Joshua Kucera

Azerbaijan is complaining about reports that Armenia has required
French/German anti-tank missiles in apparent violation of European
sanctions against the two countries. The controversy began when an
Armenian website published photos of an Armenian Ministroy of Defense
exposition last year. On display, apparently, was a MILAN anti-tank
missile, jointly produced by France and Germany.

And Azerbaijan has objected, reports APA: “The embassies of [France
and Germany] in Azerbaijan were demanded to clarify how these
countries that imposed an embargo on the sale of weapons to the
conflicting parties could deliver these systems to Armenia.”

Both the French and German ambassadors have responded publicly, saying
they didn’t do it. The French ambassador:

`I have no precise information about this sale which is very highly
improbable, because the export of military equipment would be in
contradiction with these sanctions. The French side is now
investigating the information and the source it came from.’

And the German ambassador:

“Germany is in compliance with OSCE embargoes on arms sales to Armenia
and Azerbaijan. Exports of military equipment would be contrary to the
sanctions. The federal government doesn’t have additional
information,” the embassy said.

Meanwhile, the Armenian Ministry of Defense is staying quiet on the matter.

The Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe maintains arms
sanctions on both Armenia and Azerbaijan, though obviously given that
Russia is an OSCE member, they are not watertight. The MILAN has been
produced since 1972 and is in service among at least 30 countries all
over the world, including Libya, Iraq, and Chad. So it seems very
likely that there are a number of these things floating around on the
black market, and that Armenia would have gotten them that way rather
than directly from Europe.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/67247

Armenia exports 18,200 tons of apricots

Armenia exports 18,200 tons of apricots

YEREVAN, July 13. / ARKA /. Some 18,200 tons of apricots have been
exported by Armenia as of now, up 44 percent from a year ago, a deputy
agriculture minister Robert Makaryan told reporters today. He said the
substantial increase was due to a good crop of apricots this year.

Makaryan said the bulk of exports went to Russia and neighboring
Georgia. Also 76 tons were exported to the Netherlands, Norway and
Belarus. The deputy minister said for the first time Armenian apricots
were exported to Zimbabwe, albeit in a very small batch. He said the
purchase price of the exported apricots ranged from 200 to 700 drams
per kilo.

Makaryan said also apricots are being procured by 21 local companies,
which have bought so far 10,108 tons of fruit against 4,480 tons in
the same period last year, however, the procurement process is not yet
complete. Overall, he said, 42,505 tons of fruits and vegetables have
been procured so far by local canneries, up from 31,280 tons in the
same time span last year. -0-
– See more at:

http://arka.am/en/news/business/armenia_exports_18_200_tons_of_apricots/#sthash.MokpUyod.dpuf

Un membre du commando des tueurs du Parlement arménien du 27 octobre

PARLEMENT ARMENIEN
Un membre du commando des tueurs du Parlement arménien du 27 octobre
1999 trouvé inconscient dans sa cellule

`302

Décidément, les six membres du commando de l’attentat du Parlement
arménien du 27 octobre 1999 condamnés à perpétuité continuent de
mourir en prison. Après un arrêt cardiaque de l’un des tueurs du
Parlement arménien et de l’électrocution d’un autre…un troisième
membre pourrait connaître le même destin. Edig Grigorian, ex-médecin
et membre du commando du 27 octobre, fut retrouvé par ses compagnons
de cellule, inconscient, gisant au sol dans sa cellule de la prison de
Noubarachén à Erévan. Réanimé, « il est actuellement sous la
surveillance des médecins » affirme la direction de la prison. Dirigés
par Naïri Hounanian, les membres du commando avaient fait irruption à
l’intérieur du Parlement arménien et ouvert le feu sur les hommes
politiques présents. Parmi les 8 victimes, le premier ministre Vazgen
Sargsian et le président de l’Assemblée nationale, Karen Demirdjian.

Lors du procès du commando, en 2003, toute la lumière ne fut pas faite
sur le mobile et les commanditaires de l’attentat. Aujourd’hui encore
de nombreuses thèses courent toujours sur le véritable mobile de cet
acte qui endeuilla durablement l’Arménie et la plaça sous le choc.

D’aucuns pensent à Erévan que la disparition régulière, en prison, des
auteurs de l’attentat fera également disparaitre des témoins gênants,
emportant avec eux leurs secrets sur cette affaire.

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 14 juillet 2013,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article

Armenia & Azerbaijan: Karabakh Vets Share Similar Problems

ARMENIA & AZERBAIJAN: KARABAKH VETS SHARE SIMILAR PROBLEMS

EurasiaNet.org, NY
July 12 2013

Survivors of a brutal conflict that presaged the collapse of the Soviet
Union, many Armenian and Azerbaijani veterans of the 1988-1994 war over
the disputed territory of Nagorno Karabakh actually hold one thing in
common — a fear that, nearly 20 years after the cease-fire, they are
being forgotten. And with the loss of those memories, any chance of
receiving the government-provided benefits they believe they deserve.

Hefty state coffers (Azerbaijan) or a war veteran as president
(Armenia’s Serzh Sargsyan) do not appear to affect this dilemma. Nor
do ongoing attempts to move government officials to devise broad-scale,
long-term solutions for the veterans’ frequent struggle to find decent
housing, jobs, adequate medical care or pensions that will last them
the month.

With democratic development still an ongoing challenge in both
countries, pressure-points to exact rapid change are few.

In this two-part report of stories and photos, EurasiaNet.org examines
how, almost two decades after a conflict that tore asunder the lives
of hundreds of thousands, Armenian and Azerbaijani veterans are
coping with these obstacles, and what chance, if any, they have to
defeat them.

NOTE: Click on the links to the right for both stories:

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/67235

Book On Karsh A Worthy Addition To Any Photography Buff’s Collection

BOOK ON KARSH A WORTHY ADDITION TO ANY PHOTOGRAPHY BUFF’S COLLECTION

Prince George Citizen (British Columbia)
July 11, 2013 Thursday
Final Edition

by David Travis, The Citizen

This edition of Armenian-Canadian Yousuf Karsh’s portrait photographs,
both the iconic and the uncommon, is a wellorganized and worthy
edition.

David Travis, former curator of photography at the Chicago Art
Institute, places the photographs strategically, with original text by
Karsh on his memories of these pictures. He then makes his own comments
on them, which add meaning and context to some of the world’s most
recognizable people, and tells the inner story of Karsh the artist.

There are many books on Karsh that are more elaborate, with more
photographs,

but none as economical or well-told, based on hitherto unknown
recordings by Karsh himself.

Karsh speaks of his arrival in Canada, his breakthrough with the iconic
Winston Churchill photograph, and displays a composed reverence for
his subjects that would be unattainable in today’s fast-food world of

images and i-Pads.

These photographs are compositions carefully arranged and painted
in black and white, displaying the inner life of their subjects,
like James McIntosh, the black aide to US General George Marshall
and keeper of the nation’s secrets.

Another is famous Canadian William Henry Pratt, the shy private
intellectual who we better know as Boris Karloff. Travis selects
the famous as well as the lesser known, showing that Karsh created
with an eye for looking as well as lighting, giving his subjects an
importance no matter their stature in life.

This book has all his classics and much more: George Bernard Shaw,
Peter Lorre,

Humphrey Bogart, Harry Truman, Pablo Picasso, Francois Mauriac, Ingrid
Bergman, the Kennedys, Audrey Hepburn, Grace Kelly, Ernest Hemingway,
Fidel Castro, Pierre Trudeau, Helen Keller, Nikita Khrushchev, and
probably the most reproduced portrait photo of all time, Winston
Churchill.

But it also includes Churchill after the photograph, and so delivers
much more than the sum of its parts – it lives up to its title,
Beyond the Camera.

This title can be found at the Prince George Public Library.

Reviewer Allan Wilson is the chief librarian of the Prince George
Public Library and an amateur photographer.

Tbilisi: Parity Of Armaments In Caucasus Is Not In Georgia’s Favour.

PARITY OF ARMAMENTS IN CAUCASUS IS NOT IN GEORGIA’S FAVOUR. ‘WE ARE SAFE SO LONG AS THERE IS CONFLICT BETWEEN ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN’

Rezonansi, Georgia
July 4 2013

by Eka Basilaia

At the time when there is an arms race underway in the South Caucasus
and Azerbaijan and Armenia possess the latest combat equipment worth
billions of dollars supplied by Russia, Georgia’s armaments are very
modest and not so modern, according to military experts.

When Rezonansi asked the prime minister at yesterday’s [3 July] press
conference what measures the Georgian Defence Ministry is taking
in order to preserve parity against the background of the arms race
between the South Caucasus states, he replied that the “Armed Forces
do not play the decisive role in the country’s security today.”

“The country does not need to buy armaments at this stage. We had
talks with Israel, and there was a confidential element too, but we
did not go there to buy arms. We do not need this and everything is
in order at this stage,” Bidzina Ivanishvili said.

It is worth noting that Russia supplied Baku with armaments
worth approximately 2 billion dollars in 2010 and 2011, including
strategically important S-300 surface-to-air missile systems which
can shoot down any of Armenia’s aircraft. This year, Baku bought
offensive weapons worth 1 billion dollars from Russia, including 94
T-90S tanks (i.e. the fully-equipped variant of this tank), hundreds
of other armoured vehicles, heavy artillery systems, and the latest
multiple launch rocket systems.

Russia has been supplying Armenia with these kinds of armaments,
including S-300s, for a long time now. However, unlike Azerbaijan,
[Armenia receives these armaments] at a discount price and sometimes
even completely for free, according to some commentators. At the
same time, the weapons are delivered to Armenia secretly, without
any details being disclosed.

In short, there is an arms race underway in the South Caucasus, and
two of the region’s three states are involved in it. Georgia is the
one that is not involved.

Giorgi Tavdgiridze, former head of the Military Academy, says that
Azerbaijan has purchased very large quantities of armaments from
Russia lately and the parity with Armenia has been broken, although
Russia has said that the Gyumri base [in Armenia] is sufficient to
contain Azerbaijan. Georgia lags significantly behind both neighbours
in terms of armaments.

“Russia has committed itself to ensure that this collapse of the parity
between Azerbaijan and Armenia does not result in the resumption of
conflict. For this reason, no complication is likely between these
two countries in the near future. As for Georgia, so long as there
is a problem between these two countries, Georgia will not become a
target of their aggression. One cannot even talk about parity between
us and them. It is easy to make an assessment as we are well behind
them in terms of the quantity and the quality of armaments and the
size of the Armed Forces. Georgia effectively has no air force or
air defence and is therefore incapable of establishing any kind of
protective umbrella. The armoured vehicles fleet is also problematic.

Even if we take theoretical calculations, it does not even come close
to matching Azerbaijan’s and Armenia’s armoured vehicles either
in terms of quantity or quality. Georgia has not made significant
purchases abroad since 2008,” Tavdgiridze said.

According to him, we have the Buk-M1 antiaircraft missile systems,
but only a few of them, and this quantity is not sufficient for the
protection of strategic facilities. For example, while we need to have
at least 13 Buk units, we reportedly only have five. He says that we
have not made a breakthrough in terms of antitank weapons either.

Buying modern missiles does not mean anything by itself.

Unfortunately, the Armed Forces are based on PR alone.

Giorgi Tavdgiridze: “In terms of quantity, we have not even used
up our quota. For example, we can have 250 tanks. We used to have
approximately 150 tanks and Russia captured a few dozen of those
in 2008. Also, we have T-72 tanks which is an obsolete model and is
largely inferior to Azerbaijan’s T-90. As far as antiaircraft defence
is concerned, we have the Buk, Oka, Spyder, Strela, and Grom missile
systems, but what matters is their quantity and their modern variants,
especially regarding portable antiaircraft weapons. We have the
Soviet-Polish systems of the Stinger type, which can be used against
targets at short distances and low altitudes and are therefore suitable
for defending yourself against helicopters. They are not like the
S-300, which has an operational range of 200-300 kilometres. It can
cover the entire Caucasus and is therefore an important acquisition
for the Azerbaijani Army. Even if we had a single S-300, it would
not solve all our problems. The most important thing is to create a
whole strategy and a system but it is pointless to give any advice
to the Defence Ministry.”

Retired General Vladimer Imnadze, executive director of the Generals’
Club, says that Georgia has quite modern armaments but could be facing
problems in terms of the reserve and spare parts. Most importantly,
Georgia’s armaments and equipment need to be used in the right manner.

At the same time, we need to compete with Armenia and Azerbaijan in
terms of armaments.

“Azerbaijan has an annual military budget of 3.4 billion dollars.

Armenia does not have either the funding or the armaments comparable
to those of Azerbaijan, but we should remember that Russia has signed
a military and strategic partnership agreement with Armenia and has an
obligation to defend Armenia. Moreover, Russia has a strong base in
Gyumri. Azerbaijan has signed the exact same kind of agreement with
Turkey. We are safe so long as there is a conflict between Armenia
and Azerbaijan. No matter how many weapons Georgia buys, the Army is
still small and we don’t have money either, so it is impossible to
preserve parity,” Vladimer Imnadze said.

According to the armada.ge and army.ge military analytical websites,
the following is an (incomplete) list of the Georgian Army’s current
armaments:

The Ground Forces armoury includes 186 T-72 main battle tanks (40
of which were upgraded in Israel), as well as some 20 T-55 tanks and
Ukrainian [T-84u] Oplot tanks.

The Artillery looks as follows: Grad, GRADLAR, Lar-170, and RM-70
multiple launch rocket systems. In 2012, the Army received about 10
units of the Grad-Kraz artillery systems assembled in Georgia.

The antiaircraft fleet includes ZSU-23 Shilka, Buk-M1, Osa, and Spyder
[missile systems].

The Air Force comprises nine Su-25 attack planes (that were upgraded
with new night vision, navigation, and homing systems in Israel),
seven L-39 Albatros jet trainers, 12 Mi-24 combat helicopters, and
18 Mi-8 transport helicopters.

Before the August 2008 war, the Georgian Air Force included an
antiaircraft division which was stationed at Kopitnari [airfield near
Kutaisi in west Georgia]. The unit’s armoury included the antiaircraft
missile systems Buk-M1, 9K33 Osa, and, of course, the Israeli-made
Spyders which were the greatest surprise of the August war for Russia.

The Air Force has Mi-24, Mi-8, Su-25 Mimino, and L-39 Albatros
aircraft. The Georgian Army has [UH-1] Iroquois and Mi-14 helicopters,
Hermes unmanned aerial vehicles [UAVs], Georgian-made UAVs, as well
as some 40 Skylark UAVs.

[Translated from Georgian]

How Russia Got Into This Deadlock Or Who Let The Kremlin Down

HOW RUSSIA GOT INTO THIS DEADLOCK OR WHO LET THE KREMLIN DOWN

Russia has passed to blunt threats to Armenia, at the expert level for
the time being. Constantine Zatulin, for example, threatens Armenia
“tenderly” in a long interview with the Regnum, while our Russia-based
compatriot Sergey Kurginyan says Armenians do not need independence
because they do not deserve it.

Russian reaction is increasingly nervous because their reaction means
increasingly less to Armenia. It is something like a confession or
self-discovery that produces the opposite effect and sounds like a
statement of Russia’s political bankruptcy.

At the same time, however, one should not rule out interesting
processes inside the Russian political establishment.

The Russian-Armenian relations did not appear in this deadlock in a
night and due to the European bias of one person, Serzh Sargsyan. The
problems are wider. For many years Russia has conducted a policy of
absorbing Armenia. Yerevan has not resisted because Yerevan has not had
a goal and understanding of a state policy. In Yerevan everything has
been measured with a simple logic: if Russia sponsors and safeguards
keeping power, usurping public and state resources, rigging elections,
everything must be given to Russia.

However, it becomes known that Russia also lacked or had a distorted
understanding of state policy relating to Armenia. The point is that
the absorption of Armenia for about one and a half decade was perceived
as a demonstration of force rather than self-destruction. By absorbing
Armenia, taking everything it had and leaving it as a disabled state
with the permissiveness of the Armenian government and political
forces, Russia crippled and absorbed itself, depriving itself of an
important military and political partner.

Had Russia had a full understanding of state policy, Russia would not
think about crippling Armenia as success of its regional policy. On
the contrary, it would be interested in improving the reputation and
weight of Armenia in the Euro-Atlantic environment to have a viable
partner in interactions with this community that would complete the
military and political potential of Moscow.

Meanwhile, in the long run Armenia ended up as a consolation for the
great geopolitical retreat and an object of retribution for Moscow.

The majority of the Russian political community had its contribution to
this which was the ideologist of the official policy, the encourager
and inspirer, not trying to transform the policy but doing everything
to receive the laurels. Most of them, as well as their Armenia-based
“assistants” in Yerevan received laurels indeed.

Now the failure of this “triumphant parade” is outlining more and more
clearly for official Moscow. Having invaded Armenia, Moscow is missing
Armenia more and more. And the laureates of the policy of absorption
of Armenia are starting to feel it increasingly strongly. They feel
what may happen in the Kremlin.

Instead of distribution of laurels these people will get unpleasant
questions from the Kremlin. They wish Moscow just took their laurels
back. But Moscow will not be limited to that.

Most probably, the community of laureates is driving everyone mad.

Their deception or at least inability has been revealed. Not only
official Yerevan but also their own laureates let the Kremlin down
because nothing can work against Russia better than threats and
insult addressed to Armenia and the Armenian people. The Kremlin must
understand that this is not an adequate reaction to Armenia. Most
probably, there must be at least reckoning on change of style and
team because expert perceptions of Russia are not limited to Zatulin
and Kurginyan. In fact, there is a risk of redundancy which explains
the anti-Armenian hysteria.

The feeling of loss of one’s own importance is hard indeed but one
should take care about it in time when such importance is acquired
at the expense of the national interests of Russia and Armenia.

Hakob Badalyan 23:17 12/07/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30452

Ambassador Reynaud Would Like To See More French Goods In Armenian S

AMBASSADOR REYNAUD WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE FRENCH GOODS IN ARMENIAN STORES

July 12, 2013 | 13:19

YEREVAN. – Relations between Armenia and France are at the highest
level, Ambassador Henri Reynaud said.

This refers to all areas starting from political dialogue, permanent
high level meetings and up to economic cooperation, he told reporters
on Friday.

“France is a leading western investor in Armenia and I hope that in
the near future there will be new initiatives of cooperation in this
sector,” he said. In this context, Ambassador said he would like to
see more French goods in Armenian stores and more French cars in the
Armenian roads.

Ambassador Reynaud noted that French companies are presented in
strategic areas of Armenia’s economy, pointing out Credit Agricole
Bank, Yerevan brandy factory and Orange Armenia. He is hopeful that
new French companies will appear in the Armenian market in the future.

Photo by Arsen Sargsyan/NEWS.am

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Communique Du Bureau National Du CCAF

COMMUNIQUE DU BUREAU NATIONAL DU CCAF

Le Conseil de Coordination des organisations Armeniennes de France
prend acte avec gravite de la demission de son eminence Monseigneur
Norvan ZAKARIAN, Primat du Diocèse de France de l’Eglise Apostolique
Armenienne.

Dans ces circonstances, le CCAF tient a l’assurer de son soutien et
de son estime et le remercie pour son action inlassable en faveur de
l’Eglise, du dialogue ~cumenique, de l’Ecole et plus globalement de
la Communaute Armenienne de France.

Malgre les difficultes, sa haute autorite morale lui aura permis
de remplir avec succès la mission delicate que lui avait confiee
le Saint-Siège d’Etchmiadzine : reunir les Paroisses de l’Eglise
armenienne et creer le Diocèse de France.

Monseigneur Norvan Zakarian beneficie du respect de l’ensemble de la
communaute armenienne. Il represente dignement notre Eglise auprès
des plus hautes autorites ecclesiastiques, politiques et culturelles
de France qui apprecient son charisme. Nous avons la conviction que
sa demission ne renforcera pas la place de l’Eglise armenienne. Il
a su incarner l’union et le rassemblement et c’est sur sa personne,
son integrite, le respect qu’il inspire, la confiance qu’ ‘il suscite
que nous avons tous accepte, soutenu et milite pour la reforme de
l’organisation de l’Eglise armenienne en France.

Cette demission provoque surprise et inquietude et ses consequences
risquent d’etre prejudiciables pour notre communaute. Elle est
sans aucun doute plus un message qu’un defi lance a la hierarchie de
l’Eglise qui est appelee a prendre toutes les dispositions necessaires
pour le respect des specificites des communautes diasporiques.

Une fois son mandat acheve, le CCAF souhaite que Mgr Norvan Zakarian
conserve toute sa place au sein de l’Eglise Armenienne de France,
auprès des fidèles et de la communaute.

Bureau National du CCAF Paris, le 11 Juillet

Azerbaijani Fan Of The Moldovan Lady

AZERBAIJANI FAN OF THE MOLDOVAN LADY

July 11 2013

Azerbaijanis still recalled “20 percent of “occupied” territories” at
the BSEC conference Yesterday, the Deputy of Azerbaijani Majlis Asad
Hajiyev announced in Sofia that Moldovan attorney Aurelia Grigoriu was
pursued for expressing her opinion loudly in Armenia and as if her
life is at risk. The Republican MP Gagik Minasyan informed “Aravot”
about it. Let’s remind that the 41st session of the Parliamentary
Assembly of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation is currently taking
place in Sofia. The delegation from Armenia is participating in the
session, which is headed by RPA party member, Chairman of the NA
Standing Committee on Financial-Credit and Budgetary Affairs Gagik
Minasyan. The delegation comprises the Michael Melkumyan from PAP,
Aram Manukyan from ANC, Hovhannes Margaryan from the Rule of Law. The
heads of the delegations of participating countries in the conference
should present speeches on the topic “Tourism as an important
factor in regional economic development” outlining the priorities
and accomplishments of their country in given sector. Asad Hajiyev,
head of the Azerbaijani delegation, who delivered his speech after
the head of the Armenian delegation Gagik Minasyan, describing his
country’s problems, said that Azerbaijan could have more success in the
field of tourism, if “20 percent of their territory was not occupied”
by Armenia. He also recalled the statement of the Moldovan lawyer
Aurelia Grigoriui made in RA NA during the European Conference on
“The European legal standards of the rule of law and the scope of
discretion of powers in the member States of the Council of Europe”
that “Armenia has occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan’s territory,
carrying out a genocide against the Azerbaijanis.” Moldovan lady had
also said that as if the Khojaly genocide was committed by Armenians,
which is internationally recognized as a fact. Azerbaijanis believe
that due to this reason that a person expressing such a point of view
in Armenia was allegedly subjected to pursuit and threat to her life,
Armenia can not claim to be a country with favorable conditions for
tourist. Let’s note that Moldovan lady considering herself unbiased
is still giving interviews to various mass media of Azerbaijan and is
telling new, each other contradicting stories about how as if after
her speech Armenians started to threaten her at the hotel and in
the social networks. Reversing the Azerbaijani partner’s statements,
the Armenian delegation leader Gagik Minasyan said: “The Azerbaijani
delegation once again tries to use the international platform without
authorization for spreading false information about the nature of
Karabakh conflict. While the reality is that there is no “occupation”
of the territories of Azerbaijan. The truth is that in the last
century people of Nagorno-Karabakh, according to the international
norms of that time, declared its independence, also voting for the
independence by the referendum. Whereas Azerbaijan responded in
aggression to the legal steps of Karabakh people by involving and
using heavy military artillery, international terrorists, including
“Al-Qaida” fighters. Azeri aggression for the country ended in a
shameful defeat, for the simple reason that Azerbaijan was trying
to stifle the freedom and independence in the blood, but Karabakh
was defending its independence and dignity.” Later, PAP MP Mikayel
Melkumyan also referred to the statements of the Azerbaijani delegate
in his speech, noting that unacceptable, inappropriate, and false
statements were made in the speech of Azerbaijan’s delegate, in
particular, that there were pursues against this lady in Yerevan,
and her life was in danger. “These statement, to put it mildly, do
not meet the reality, and the Moldovan lawyer’s statements in Yerevan
during the discussion organized by the Constitutional Court can be
assessed as ordered and provocative. The whole world knows that Armenia
is an open country, and unlike our eastern neighbor, the life of a
citizen of any country can not be at least a little bit in danger in
Armenia,” – said Mikayel Melkumyan, reminded that immediately after
the speech the lawyer lady, at the same discussion, from the same
platform, a member of the Constitutional Court of Moldova expressed
its disagreement with the views expressed by his co-citizen lady.

Melkumyan has noted that the statements on “20 percent of “occupied”
territories” and unsuccessful ‘trapped situation’ of scandals
lady do not conduce to the development of relations between the
two countries, also within the framework of the Black Sea Economic
Cooperation. The Deputy of PAP has also noted that a state, in which
a Member of Parliament makes public and ambitious statements about the
tourism status of the its country, simultaneous meets with honors and
declares a hero to a certain murderer Safarov. Gagik Minasyan also
added that the representatives of other delegations participating
in the conference responded positively to the speeches of Armenians,
which did not happen after the speeches of Azerbaijanis.

Nelly GRIGORYAN

Read more at:

http://en.aravot.am/2013/07/11/155391/