Armenia And Azerbaijan: Dialogue Between Diasporas

ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN: DIALOGUE BETWEEN DIASPORAS

Vestnik Kavkaza
Oct 25 2012
Russia

In the context of politicians’ and experts’ warning about threats to
inter-ethnic peace in Russia, the round table “Azerbaijani and Armenian
Diasporas of Russia: inter-ethnic dialogue” was held in Moscow. The
initiators – the Federal National and Cultural Autonomy of Azerbaijanis
and the Armenian Union of Russia – wanted to emphasize a special role
of national-cultural entities in establishing of inter-ethnic peace
in Russia.

Armen Dzhigarkhanyan, Peoples’ Artist of the USSR

There are some forces which can turn over people and establish hatred.

It is possible in any situation and story. But we are neighbors.

Previously the biggest conflict was a football match between Ararat
and Neftchi. When Armenian theaters came to Baku with guest tours,
it was a real festival. People cried, laughed together. When Zeinab
Khanlarova came to Yerevan with concerts, it was a festival too. But
there are people who try to set us against each other.

I think religious activists and people of art should play a big role
in normalization of Armenian-Azerbaijani relations. Many years ago
when I was young and handsome, I took part in the film “What the
River Roars About” about frontier guards. The biggest conflict was
when a cow crossed the border “illegally”. People began to discuss how
to return the cow. It is a Biblical story. The more friends we have,
the great love we feel to each other, the sooner the conflict will be
settled. I am a realist and understand that conflicts between states
and nations are possible. But I ask God and Allah for our biggest
conflict would be about football. Otherwise, we will be split. Some
“good” people would be there, and suddenly we would realize that we
hold a gun in our pockets. It should be prevented. I think we are two
good nations – Azerbaijani and Armenian. Each of us should listen to
his heart and conscience. If we have disputes, let’s settle them,
set questions to each other. People should agree. We have no other
variant. We cannot say: “No, he should be first!” Television ruins
the whole issue. We are imposed on the idea that there are some awful
things, hatred. When I watch Russian television, I don’t want to live
anymore: somewhere explosion took place, somebody was killed, somebody
was chocked. We won’t survive in this situation. Art does too little
in this sphere. I have noticed a surprising thing: people don’t go
to theatre. At the moment the Kremlin Tennis Cup is taking place,
but nobody goes there to watch. Halls are empty. It is a serious
accusation to our society. We are not curious. Theaters even have
bureaus for organization of audience. Soon we will give birth to
babies in the following way: gather people and give birth to babies.

Tamara Pukhova, the chairwoman of the Woman Council of AzerRos

When the Soviet Union collapsed and the civil war began, we, common
people, people of culture, scientists, appeared to be victims of the
politics. Those who were raised in the USSR are proud of having such
a splendid person and actor, our teacher. There are many people who
bring their national identity, peculiarity. But why did we let them
destroy this identity? Today it is very sad to hear how politicians
impose false ideas about Nagorno-Karabakh on young people. As a
hostess I would like to say: every cooker cooks dolma in her own way.

She puts her heart and love into it – not only meat, green, rice. If
there is no love, no respect to those whom you want to give a treat,
life is senseless.

Soun Sadykov, the head of AzerRos

Many Armenians and Azerbaijani live together, work together, conduct
business, there are even mixed marriages between young people in
Russia. If we look at the history of Armenian and Azerbaijani people,
we see that they lived together for centuries and they will live
together forever. Mixed marriages were widely spread between them. We
have to do our best for young people not to trust provocations of
radicals who exist among Armenians and Azerbaijanis, as well as among
other ethnic-groups living in Russia.

Armen Smbatyan, the ambassador of Armenia in Russia

The wound is fresh, but in 1946 nobody could imagine that several
decades later Russians and Germans would be good friends. I notice
striving toward each other, but fear is still present. What would
they say? Wouldn’t it be treated in a wrong way? You should not be
afraid of it! We should communicate. Even if we don’t love each other,
we have to communicate as civilized people. Today we kill each other
like animals. Russia and Japan has a great problem – the Kuril Islands.

However, nobody kills anyone. They are communicating, providing
diplomatic and trade relations. Why do we cross the line? I think we
have to realize it, help and give a piece of advice to each other.

Russia is our friend. Russia really wants and does its best for
making us agree and settle our problems. Let other Diasporas in other
countries see it and make them do the same, and I am sure it will
influence our countries – Armenia and Azerbaijan. We are doomed for
peace. We are doomed for living in agreement. We are neighbors. We
cannot move to space – either Armenians or Azerbaijanis. Where will we
go? What will be next? We have to agree. If we could influence major
Armenian and Azerbaijani media, it will be a big achievement. If we
continue our peacemaking activity with Polad Byul-Byul Ogly, my friend,
I think we will do everything together.

Jury Passes Guilty Verdict For Six Skinheads Accused Of Hate Murders

JURY PASSES GUILTY VERDICT FOR SIX SKINHEADS ACCUSED OF HATE MURDERS

ITAR-TASS
October 24, 2012 Wednesday 10:38 AM GMT+4
Russia

A panel of jurors has passed a guilty verdict for six skinheads for
hate attacks and murders, the press service of the Moscow City Court
told Itar-Tass.

The defendants in the prisoner’s dock are Dmitry Sudakov, Alexander
Kichutkin, Vladimir Belyakov, Alexei Kiselyov, Vladimir Stepanov,
Yemelyan Nikolayev and Stepan Kuzmin. Kuzmin was unanimously cleared
of the charges. The jury said the guilt of other defendants had been
fully proven.

According to the case materials, Belyakov, Stepanov, Kiselyov and
Kichutkin were underage as of the moment of crimes. Kichutkin already
had a conviction at the time.

In October 2009, Nikolayev, Sudakov, Belyakov and Kichutkin, armed
with knives, were walking along Vvedensky Street, looking for targets
to attack among persons of non-Slav appearance. An Armenian citizen
became their victim. He died of massive blood loss.

“Feeling ethnic hate and strife toward the man, and seeking to lynch
him, Nikolayev, Sudakov, Belyakov and Kichutkin attacked the victim,
stabbing, kicking and punching him repeatedly,” the investigators said.

They stabbed the man at least 11 times and robbed him.

In March 2010, they committed a similar crime against a native of Asia
on a train between the Veshnyaki and Plyushchevo stations in Moscow.

One of the skinheads sprayed Mace in his face, and then his accomplices
beat up the man and stabbed him. The man died.

Another attack occurred in Akademik Artsimovich Street in April 2010.

This time, a wounded foreigner managed to escape.

The court will announce the verdict on October 30.

Safarov Issue And Regulating Basic Principles To Be Discussed During

SAFAROV ISSUE AND REGULATING BASIC PRINCIPLES TO BE DISCUSSED DURING THE MEETING TO BE LAUNCHED WITH ARMENIAN AND AZERBAIJANI FOREIGN MINISTERS: MARGAROV

ARMENPRESS
OCTOBER 25, 2012
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 25, ARMENPRESS: In the course of the scheduled
meeting to be launched between Armenian and Azerbaijani Foreign Affair
Ministers on October 27, Armenian side will present its stance to
Azerbaijani authority on Ramil Safarov extradition and subsequent
pardon. Politician Alexander Margarov stated in the briefing with
Armenpress.

“Inadequate actions by Azerbaijani side, condemned by many
international communities, including condemnation statements by one
of committees of Czech Republic Legislative Body, come to prove the
international community does not accept the actions by Azerbaijani
side, which has violated not only international conventions but its
own legislation” Margarov announced. According to the analyst Karabakh
conflict regulation basic principles will also be discussed in the
course of the scheduled meeting.

Discussion of other issues in the context of recent and regional
developments are not expected in the words of the interlocutor. The
meeting between Armenian and Azerbaijani Foreign Affair Ministers
Edward Nalbandyan and Elmar Mammadyarov is scheduled to take place
on October 27, Paris. It will be the first meeting between the two
Foreign Ministers after the extradition of criminal Ramil Safarov axe
murdering innocent Armenian officer while asleep during a three-month
English language course in the framework of Partnership for Peace
NATO-sponsored program.

The co-chairs are planning to pay a visit to NKR conflict zone to
“rehabilitate” the frozen negotiations after the known incident.

Le Bhk Presentera Peut-Etre Son Propre Candidat En 2013

LE BHK PRESENTERA PEUT-ETRE SON PROPRE CANDIDAT EN 2013
Laetitia

armenews.com
jeudi 25 octobre 2012

Le parti Armenie prospère (BHK) de Gagik Tsarukian a ostensiblement
refuse mercredi 23 octobre de preciser quel candidat il soutiendra
pour la prochaine election presidentielle.

” Tsarukian repondra a toutes les questions au bon moment “, a-t-il
declare a RFE / RL (Azatutyun.am) a l’ouverture d’une exposition
commerciale russo-armenienne a Erevan.

Le BHK pourrait peut-etre presente son propre candidat en 2013. Le
BHK est egalement de plus en plus courtise par le Congrès national
armenien (HAK), l’un des groupes majeurs d’opposition du pays. Levon
Zurabian, un leader du HAK, a declare mardi que le bloc est pret
a s’associer avec le BHK pour vaincre Sarkissian lors du scrutin
presidentiel. Urikhanian a dit : ” Personne ne peut dire encore ce
qui va arriver, surtout en ce qui concerne le BHK, parce que nous
n’en avons pas encore parle. ”

Baku: Us Backs Democratic Reforms In Azerbaijan, Against Tension Wit

US BACKS DEMOCRATIC REFORMS IN AZERBAIJAN, AGAINST TENSION WITH ARMENIA – ENVOY

Turan news agency
Oct 19 2012
Azerbaijan

In an exclusive interview with Turan, the US ambassador expressed
the attitude of official Washington to the most serious recent events
and topical issues of political life in Azerbaijan.

Q: In recent days, the situation in the region deteriorated in the
light of two events: the pardon of Safarov and statements of the
Armenian side on the launch of the airport in Xocali city. Some experts
do not exclude that the resumption of flights may cause hostilities
in Karabakh. What does the official Washington think about it, and
what steps are being taken to prevent conflict?

US envoy on pardon of Azeri officer, Xocali airport

Ambassador Morningstar: I can give you a general answer and then
more specifically if you want to talk about the Safarov pardon and
the airport.

First of all, we are doing everything that we can to discourage any
kind of increased tensions and any escalation of conflict. What I
do here in Baku is certainly discourage any kind of escalation of
conflict. We’re doing everything possible to achieve a peaceful
resolution through the Minsk Group process.

With respect to the specific issues that you’re concerned about, on
the Safarov pardon, I certainly stand behind the statements that were
made, by the State Department and by the White House, with respect
to the Safarov pardon. Those statements clearly say that we condemn
any actions that will escalate tensions in the region.

In connection with the airport, I would refer to the statements made
by the Minsk Group. One particular statement made last week, on 14
April last year, and then again on 13 July of this year. In last
year’s statement the Minsk Group co-chairs expressed their concern
that the planned opening of the airport in Nagornyy Karabakh could
lead to further increased tension. It very explicitly stated concern
by the Minsk Group co-chairs and that the co-chairs have received
continuing assurances that there will be no violence against civil
aircraft which is very important.

The Minsk Group co-chairs have also stated that the opening of the
airport would have absolutely no effect on the current status of
Nagornyy Karabakh under international law. They reject any argument
that that the airport would somehow give increased status to Nagornyy
Karabakh. The hope, of course, is that the parties can resolve the
issue through international conventions and international law, but
again it is clear that the Minsk Group has raised all these issues
and made the statement that the opening of the airport could increase
tensions.

Envoy salutes Azerbaijan’s energy projects

Q: You have been an active participant in the implementation of
international energy projects in Azerbaijan. Today it is often heard
that the positives from the sale of oil contracts have benefited
only a narrow segment of the population, leaving aside most of the
country’s population. Do you agree with this opinion?

Ambassador Morningstar: I’ll answer the question this way. I strongly
believe that Azerbaijan is better off because of the development of its
energy resources. At the same time it’s important that Azerbaijan’s
economy become more diversified and I think the government is
trying hard to diversify the economy into other areas – information,
communications, technology, infrastructure, agriculture, and many
other areas.

There’s always progress to be made as well. It’s important that the
needs of the Azerbaijani people be taken care of and that the energy
resources and revenues from the energy resources can help to do this.

Q: So, the problem is not in the contract, but such issues as
corruption and inequitable distribution? And what do you think of
the fight against corruption in Azerbaijan?

Ambassador Morningstar: I think it goes without saying that the less
corruption, the more benefit to the people. This is an issue that
we constantly press the government on. President Aliyev, in public
statements this week, has talked about the need to reduce corruption.

We work with the Azerbaijani government to increase transparency with
respect to the economy. It’s a very important part of our agenda. We
continue to urge the government to make continuing progress with
respect to eliminating corruption. And hopefully steps will be taken
to further improve that situation.

Priorities

Q: At your first press conference in Baku on 10 September, you stated
priority of security, energy, democracy and human rights. You also
mentioned the dialogue between the government and opposition in
Azerbaijan. Your predecessor, Ambassador Bryza was the initiator of
the dialogue for promoting reform, but his idea was unsuccessful. Do
you plan to organize such a dialogue?

Ambassador Morningstar: We have. And in fact there has been already
one session between the presidential administration, opposition and
civil society representatives. He has committed to do more. But I
think the important point to make is that the democracy and human
rights are critically important to Azerbaijan’s future. Secretary of
State Clinton has said that our closest relationships are with those
countries that value democracy and human rights.

So we continually raise these issues with the government. We will
continue to seek improvement with respect to these issues. We believe
it’s advantageous for the government of Azerbaijan to create a more
pluralistic society. I have spent a lot of time since I’ve been here
speaking to youth groups here. In the future Azerbaijan depends upon
the youth and I think that the young people in this country are going
to have to see that they have opportunities here. I think it’s up
to the government to ensure that that happens and to create a more
open society, to continue to progress and create a more open society,
to provide opportunities to all citizens.

So this is an issue that is very high on our agenda. In every meeting
with senior officials we talk about these issues. We talk about some
specific cases. We also talk about the importance of continuing to
open up the society and create more transparency within the society
and recognizing democratic values.

On reforms

Q: Do you believe that authorities have the political will for
real reform? Civil society believes that it does not, and talks
about the dialogue are of a formal nature. In our society there
is an opinion that the cause of general apathy is frustrating to
democratic values, because the current reality in the form of an
authoritarian political system, total corruption and the violation
of fundamental freedoms is seen as a consequence of democracy. This,
in turn, drives a significant part of society, especially the youth,
to turn to religion. Do not you think that this should be an alarm
bell for the supporters of democracy?

Ambassador Morningstar: Obviously dialogue will not be successful if
it is purely formalistic. It is important as part of any dialogue
and important for any government to listen to its citizens and to
listen to what their concerns are and what their problems are. And
to deal with those problems. And it’s important for any society,
including Azerbaijan, for the people, particularly young people, to
believe that they have an opportunity to grow, to be educated, to be
able to have careers where they can succeed and better themselves in
that society as well. To be able to have strong families that can make
ends meet and can live a reasonable life. These are the real issues.

And if the government listens to those kinds of concerns and helps to
develop in that direction, then Azerbaijan will be a very prosperous
and strong country.

On upcoming presidential poll

Q: Next year presidential elections will be held in Azerbaijan. How
does the USA assess the intention of Ilham Aliyev to run for president
a third time?

Ambassador Morningstar: Well, I don’t think the issue is whether
Aliyev runs for a third term or not. The issue is will there be fair
elections? And we’ll see. We hope they are fair. We’re certainly
happy to work with the government, helping the government meet its
commitments, its international commitments with respect to these
elections. I certainly hope that will be the case and we’re happy to
help ensure that.

We also have to remember that a true democracy is more than just an
election day decision. Democracy requires civil society, democracy
requires institutions that are open and transparent. Elections require
a freedom of the media, freedom to express ideas.

So all of these things are important. We certainly, these are
issues that we do talk about with the government. We hope that we
can cooperate with them and that the government will ensure that
the elections coming up will be free and fair and will provide for
freedom of the media, freedom of expression, and that there will be
a truly fair and open election.

On freedoms

Q: The reports of the US State Department, Freedom House and other
formal and informal structures of USA state serious problems with
freedom of speech, democracy and human rights in Azerbaijan. What
specific measures are planned by Washington to improve the situation
in this regard?

Ambassador Morningstar: We can look at specific projects as well as
our ongoing discussions that we always have with the government with
respect to these issues, with respect to some of the specific cases
that come up. But we also have various programmes that can help to
foster civil society, help to develop transparency, and to work with
the youth, to encourage an opening of the society. I think in the
day of the social network it’s virtually impossible to control the
internet and the social network and I think there’s real opportunity
for pluralistic ideas to develop through the society network and that
the government can also use the social network and the internet to
help prove to the citizens of Azerbaijan it is doing things to open
up opportunities for all of its citizens.

On developments around Iran

Q: The next important topic is the tension around Iran. Many experts do
not exclude a quick military action against Tehran. Is the USA ready
to defend Azerbaijan in case of attack by Iran, which threatened to
bomb the “American targets” in neighbouring countries in case of war?

Ambassador Morningstar: I’d answer that in two ways. One, Iran is
certainly an issue with respect to Azerbaijan. We work closely with
the government with respect to issues relating to Iran and relating
to security assistance, counter-terrorism and the like. It is an
important part of our relationship.

But I also think it’s important to understand what the United
States policy is with respect to Iran. We hope very much that the
combination of diplomacy and very tough sanctions will ultimately
bring about an agreement with respect to Iran’s nuclear programme
that will be satisfactory to all concerned. We think that there is
still time for diplomacy along with sanctions to work. So we are
hopeful that military action will not become necessary and at the
same time I think the President has made clear that a nuclear armed
Iran is not an acceptable option. Hopefully diplomacy and sanctions
will work. We’re working at that every day.

I understand the concerns of people in Azerbaijan with respect to
this issue. It’s a concern for everybody. That’s why our government
is working so hard to ultimately come to a resolution using very
tough sanctions to come to a diplomatic resolution.

But again, the President has made clear that a nuclear armed Iran is
not an acceptable option.

Q: For Azerbaijan, there is a more serious problem, the Karabakh
conflict, which remains unresolved for over 20 years. In recent times
there are opinions that the OSCE Minsk Group has exhausted itself,
and there is a need to search for new formats of settlement. A number
of American experts such as Mary Ouen, suggest applying the method
of coercion to peace, as it did in Bosnia. What are your thoughts on
the matter?

Ambassador Morningstar: We’re committed to the Minsk Group process. At
this point we certainly, there is no existing alternative to the Minsk
Group process. We are totally committed also to a peaceful resolution
of the conflict.

What’s necessary ultimately for resolution is political will of all the
parties to reach a resolution. Whatever the format of negotiations is
or is not, unless there’s that strong political will of all parties,
it’s going to be very difficult to achieve a solution.

Certainly speaking from our position here in Baku, the US position,
I’m working hard with our Minsk Group negotiators and with the
government to look at possible creative ways to resolve the conflict.

The whole Nagornyy Karabakh issue, I can tell you from my conversations
with Secretary of State Clinton prior to coming here, is a top
priority and the number one issue I know in her view with respect to
Azerbaijan. And I’ve said publicly in public before, I would be the
happiest person in the world if this were resolved during the time
that I was here in Baku. I will continue to work with our Minsk Group
negotiators and others, to see what we can do to help and be creative
and hopefully come to a solution.

I also recognize that the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict is just a deep
and emotional issue for all Azerbaijanis. It really doesn’t matter
what a person’s political views are. Everybody I’ve met, are deeply
concerned about the suffering this conflict has generated. The pain
that it’s generated.

On Azeri president’s criticism of BP

Q: Let’s go back to energy issues. How do you assess the prospects
of Trans-Caspian gas pipeline?

Ambassador Morningstar: Well, we’ll see. I’ve been involved in trying
to get a Trans-Caspian Pipeline done since 1998. It still hasn’t
happened. The European Union, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan negotiated
to try and get a Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline done. Turkey has a strong
interest, a strong desire to see a Trans-Caspian Pipeline. Again,
I know nothing more than those negotiations will be successful. But
again, we’ll see. We certainly support a Trans-Caspian Pipeline and
hopefully the negotiations that are taking place will be successful.

Q: How do you assess sharp criticism by Ilham Aliyev against BP?

Ambassador Morningstar: Certainly we’re aware of the issues that
President Aliyev raised yesterday that has been reported on in
the press. The relationship between the government of Azerbaijan,
and SOCAR, with BP is critically important. BP and the Azerbaijani
government have had a relationship that has gone on now for close
to 20 years. There are issues. I’m sure that if all the parties act
in good faith that they’ll resolve those issues. We certainly don’t
take sides. We encourage that these issues be resolved and I’m also
confident that they will be resolved.

Q: Last week there was a scandal in connection with a video, where a
member of parliament extorted money from the rector of the university
for the last elections as a deputy. How do you feel about this event?

Ambassador Morningstar: It’s hard for me to comment on that. We follow
it closely. We obviously don’t know all of the facts. The only thing
that we would encourage is that there be a thorough transparent
investigation of what happened.

On strengthening of Islamic factor

Q: It’s no secret that in Azerbaijan in recent years the Islamic factor
has strengthened in Azerbaijan, the role and influence of believers
is growing. In this case, there are concerns that Islam is becoming
a more political factor. How do you assess these trends?

Ambassador Morningstar: I’ll go back to what I said earlier, that the
issue that Azerbaijan or any country faces with respect to any kind
of radical opposition, whether it be radical Islamic opposition or
other radical oppositions of other kinds, is that governments have
to convince their citizens that they have opportunity. Particularly
the youth, the women, they all have opportunities to succeed in the
society. If in fact, the society in general believes that Azerbaijan
is becoming increasingly democratic, is becoming more open, and
is providing the requisite opportunities for all of its citizens,
then I think any kind of radical opposition would be, it would be
very unlikely that radical opposition could develop in that kind
of environment.

[Tranlated]

Baku: Osce Secretary General Concerned The Lack Of Progress Of Nagor

OSCE SECRETARY GENERAL CONCERNED THE LACK OF PROGRESS OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

Trend
Oct 24 2012
Azerbaijan

OSCE Secretary General Lamberto Zannier concerned the lack of progress
of settlement of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

“When it comes to Nagorno-Karabakh everyone is concerned about the
absence of progress, and the deterioration of the situation on the
ground, with 28 people killed only this year. I personally share
this concern. We continue to support the efforts of the Minsk Group
and its Co-Chairs – Russia, France and the US”, said Zannier in an
interview to Interfax news agency on Tuesday.

According to him, no international efforts can be effective if there
is no political will on both sides to negotiate a peaceful solution.

“This is what I stressed during my recent meetings with the respective
foreign ministers in New York. Returning to the substance of the
negotiations and looking ahead are the only ways to prevent escalation
and bring the long-awaited security to the region” Zannier added.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian armed
forces have occupied 20 per cent of Azerbaijan since 1992, including
the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.Azerbaijan
and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994.

The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France and the U.S. –
are currently holding peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

Baku: Sam Director To Attend Forum On "armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno Ka

SAM DIRECTOR TO ATTEND FORUM ON “ARMENIA-AZERBAIJAN NAGORNO KARABAKH CONFLICT”

APA
Oct 24 2012
Azerbaijan

Baku – APA. Director of the Center for Strategic Studies under the
President of Azerbaijan Farhad Mammadov will pay an official visit to
Vienna on October 26-27 to participate and make a speech in the Vienna
Forum of the Azerbaijani students studying in the European countries on
“Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno Karabakh conflict”. The SAM told APA that
the forum is organized by the SAM, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
Azerbaijan, the Ministry of Youth and Sports, the Azerbaijani embassy
in Austria, Youth Foundation, Public Union “Azerbaijani community of
Nagorno Karabakh region of the Republic of Azerbaijan” and ASAIF.

Azerbaijani officials and experts plan to discuss the legal,
humanitarian and other aspects of the negotiations process on the
Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

Georgia To Consolidate Caucasus Interests

GEORGIA TO CONSOLIDATE CAUCASUS INTERESTS

Vestnik Kavkaza
Oct 24 2012
Russia

Parliamentary committees and Georgian fractions are discussing a state
program to unite interests of Caucasus states. The new government
plans to improve ties with Azerbaijan, Armenia and Turkey.

Georgia wants to restore relations with Russia using international
mechanisms.

Joining the EU and NATO are a priority of Georgian foreign policy.

Contribution to international military operations is considered one
of the most important components for protection of national interests.

The US is considered the primary ally of the country, according to
the program.

The document states full-scale settlement of conflicts, strengthening
of democratic institutions and activation of public diplomacy.

Negotiations on security should help develop a mechanism within the
framework of the OSCE or UN.

Georgia plans to change principles of activities of the Abkhaz
and South Ossetian governments operating in Tbilisi. They will be
authorized to work with issues of forced migrants.

Bidzina Ivanishvili of Georgian Dream, winner of the recent
parliamentary polls, has already presented a list of new ministers. He
plans to become the prime minister.

Voting on the new Cabinet will be held at the parliament on October 25.

Armenian Society Is Tired Of The Same Politicians

ARMENIAN SOCIETY IS TIRED OF THE SAME POLITICIANS

Vestnik Kavkaza
Oct 24 2012
Russia

Interview by David Stepanyan, Yerevan. Exclusively to Vestnik Kavkaza

The leader of “New Times”, the presidential candidate Aram Karapetyan,
in an interview to Vestnik Kavkaza indicates the reasons for the
political persecution of Vardan Oskanian and the interests of the West
and Russia in the upcoming presidential elections in the republic on
18 February 2013.

– How do you see the cause of the “Oskanian case”? Can I say that as
a result of this political order, Oskanian lost the chance of becoming
a presidential candidate?

– Starting with the deprivation of immunity, all the events taking
place around former foreign minister Oskanian are a political game,
with three scenarios. I suppose in the first scenario the Armenian
authorities are promoting Oskanian’s candidacy as a rival to the
current president Serzh Sargsyan, so that subsequently Oskanian
easily recognizes the victory of the incumbent president. The fact
is that Oskanian is too vulnerable and easy to reproach by his share
of responsibility for the tragic events of 1 March 2008, and it has
undoubtedly played a role in the choice of officials. I can also
assume that by using the fuss around Oskanian “Prosperous Armenia”
is trying to enlist the support of opposition voters, presenting
its own candidate. The third version of the game is related to
the super-powers, including Russia and the U.S.. Oskanian is a
pro-Western politician, and “Prosperous Armenia” declares itself as a
pro-Russian party; respectively, either PAP or Oskanian should change
their orientation, but it is not yet clear who will do this. I note
that, objectively, Sargsyan today has very bad odds for re-election,
but based on the experience of past elections it is clear that, in
principle, it is not difficult to draw some figures in the elections
in Armenia. In this case, a priori, under equal initial conditions
Sargsyan will lose to any normal candidate at the start. Accordingly,
in order to regularly reproduce, the authorities need specific
technologies aimed at enlisting the support of “Prosperous Armenia”
in the upcoming presidential election.

– What will the support of the PAP give to the Republicans?

– First of all, this is the ability to draw on the results of the
election the figures that are more or less close to reality, because
without the support of the “Prosperous Armenia” drawing this figure
will be difficult. Today we see the situation of the country, as a
result of the inadequacy of the authorities, and the level of public
trust in government. In these circumstances, the support of the PAP
will let the Republicans once again share their responsibility for
the drawn numbers in the presidential election with it, providing a
particular argument for this. Considering “the Oskanian case” from
a legal point of view, everybody will understand that this is just
a bubble, therefore, pre-election machinations in the occurrence
of this case are obvious. It is obvious that if Oskanian nominates
his candidacy, it will be clear that he does so with the permission
of Serge Sargsyan. That is, in any case, this option is flawed and
has no political scientific value. In any case, understanding that
for the next presidency Serzh Sargsyan will need a pro-Western
candidate presents itself both in Yerevan and in Moscow, because
Serge Sargsyan cannot beat a pro-Russian candidate. But beating a
pro-Western candidate is possible, especially given the tradition
to portray any opposition candidate as Westerners and then to “beat”
him in the election by massive fraud. It is possible that a similar
scenario is being prepared for Oskanian.

– Yes, but can we call President Sargsyan a pro-Russian politician,
given his penchant for “euro-repair”?

– I think that the main problem is not the point, because the
Kremlin’s manner of working with governments in the post-Soviet space
is clearly not justified, given that in virtually all countries of the
CIS the forces coming to power are largely westernized. Accordingly,
maintaining continuity in the geopolitical policies and the impact of
the superpowers in the country requires working with all political
parties, and not just with the government. And today in Armenia,
Moscow faces a problem generated by this attitude. Yes, there
is the military-political component of the strategic partnership
between Armenia and Russia, but in all other respects, we have become
pro-Western. Yes, there are pragmatic politicians trying to build good
relations with Moscow and Brussels, but no one including “Prosperous
Armenia” has an ideological affinity with Moscow. In this case, the
main problem of the Armenian opposition in today’s circumstances
is inconsistency in their actions, respectively, in the current
circumstances it is unlikely to be able to come to an agreement on a
single candidate in the election of 2013. Therefore, the opposition in
Armenia can win elections only with a candidate who has an extremely
rigid, radical, uncompromising position. Unfortunately, there are no
such politicians in Armenia, and everyone is tied to each other by
mutual agreements, and in some cases by compromising information.

Accordingly, it can be concluded that Armenian society wants to see at
the helm of power politicians whom people have never seen there. We
are tired of the same people and, as a result, if we want such a
candidate to win in any election in the country we need to change
the entire political system of elite relationships.

– But in Armenia, there are politicians that previously stood at
the helm, but they do not have any power today. Robert Kocharian,
for example…

– Robert Kocharian may run in the upcoming election if there will be
the external demand and the political order for this. So far, there
is no such demand, because changes in Armenia scheduled from outside
will be carried out by other people who have the chance to do that
well in excess of the political possibilities of Kocharian. Beginning
in 2008, the entire PR of Kocharian is built on his friendship with
Russian President Vladimir Putin and on the fact that in the years
of his presidency people supposedly lived better. But when viewed
objectively, the situation in Armenia remains unsatisfactory.

– But may the opportunities of Kocharian be sufficient for the
premiership?

– I do not see any realistic scenario and with the appointment of the
Prime Minister Kocharian, because the ex-president, according to the
information I have already, has said that, while Serge Sargsyan was
prime minister under his presidency, there cannot be any opposite
situation. So I think that the current situation suits Kocharian,
especially given that at the time of his presidency he became one
of the founders of the criminal-oligarchic system in Armenia. The
same can be said of Levon Ter-Petrosian, who also feels quite
at ease. In this context, there is an inexorable necessity of
creating new opportunities for new political forces, capable and
most importantly, willing to break the current vicious system and to
create a new normal system of power formation and governance. In my
view, whether the authorities want it or not, they will not survive
for a long time at the helm, even if they are able to survive in the
upcoming presidential election. Under the current political system,
to my great regret, this can be done only by the rebellion.

– What are the main challenge now facing Armenia?

– The main challenge facing Armenia, which cannot be overcome, is a
challenge to economic development of the country. Today the situation
in this area continues to be extremely disappointing. Another important
challenge is a gradual degradation of the Armenian population that
results in fraudulent elections, the presence of sects and other
unsightly conditions. I believe that the solutions to all these
problems are interconnected and are embedded in the inadequacy of
the authorities. In this case, I do not believe that the notorious
European integration will help prevent acts of force majeure scenario
in Armenia. I mean bloodless change of power in a normal, civilized
way. Country’s relations with the European Union do not lead to
qualitative changes; the Armenians are not Europeanizing – on the
contrary, they are degrading. In this case, it happens not because of
the notorious European integration, but because in Armenia there are
processes which Europe cannot influence. It is not even able to deal
with the situation in the Member States – in Greece, Spain, Portugal,
etc. So Europe clearly has nothing to do with us, and for real, not
declarative integration into the EU an understanding of the world in
the political, economic and legal aspects must be built in Armenia,
without rushing into the EU in the form in which the republic exists.

The processes taking place in our country cannot be changed by only
external factors; we need internal forces, factors and motivation.

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/analysis/politics/32904.html

Statue Of Azerbaijan Dictator Brings Distant Conflict To Mexico City

STATUE OF AZERBAIJAN DICTATOR BRINGS DISTANT CONFLICT TO MEXICO CITY’S CHAPULTEPEC PARK

MyrtleBeachOnline.com
Oct 24 2012

By Tim Johnson – McClatchy Newspapers

MEXICO CITY — The new, larger-than-life statue at one entrance to
Mexico City’s iconic Chapultepec Park may be inert but it’s also
proving politically radioactive.

The bronze-colored likeness is of Heydar Aliyev, the late KGB strongman
and dictator of Azerbaijan, once part of the former Soviet Union in
the distant Caucasus region of Eurasia.

Most Mexicans who pass the statue are unaware of Aliyev’s legacy. Yet
a vocal minority has raised an outcry over why a former Soviet-era
autocrat is immortalized more prominently here than such moral icons
as Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., whose statues can be
found on far more obscure side streets.

Amid citizen protests, City Hall this week agreed to review its
decision to accept a roughly $5 million payment from oil-rich
Azerbaijan before erecting the statue and a second monument to
commemorate a purported “genocide” next to a colonial church downtown.

It might seem a quaint one-off dispute, but experts say it’s one that
has ricocheted around the world, in a dozen cities where Azerbaijani
diplomats have paid for stone, bronze and even wax likenesses of
Aliyev, who died in 2003.

“They have also paid for a Heydar Aliyev waxwork in Madame Tussauds in
London and many other such projects,” said Thomas de Waal, a Caucasus
expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a nonprofit
think tank based in Washington that’s dedicated to global cooperation.

Armenia, a bitter rival of Azerbaijan, sent its foreign minister this
week to Mexico, where he curtly reminded diplomats that Azerbaijan has
“one of the most anti-democratic and repressive regimes in the world.”

Flowerbeds flank the Aliyev statue, and a huge marble map of Azerbaijan
serves as a backdrop. Aliyev gazes in stillness on busy Paseo de
la Reforma, the European-style boulevard that is the most important
thoroughfare in this capital.

A plaque calls Aliyev “a great politician and statesman” and a
“shining example of infinite devotion to the homeland and loyalty to
the universal ideas of world peace.”

Intellectuals, Jewish leaders and Mexicans of Armenian descent have
been vociferous opponents of the Aliyev statue, which was inaugurated
Aug. 22.

“Why do you build a park and set up a monument to a person who is
not known for his human rights record and call it a park of peace
and friendship?” asked Roberto Keoseyan, an Armenian-Mexican lawyer.

Keoseyan said he’d heard people wonder aloud if the capital’s leftist
City Hall might someday choose to “build a statue to Osama bin Laden.”

Aliyev, whose son now rules Azerbaijan, took control of what was
then a Soviet republic in 1969 while running the local KGB, the state
security apparatus. When the Soviet Union crumbled, Aliyev remained
in power as president until his death, leaving a legacy of corruption,
political suppression and censorship of the media.

Azerbaijan, a once-forgotten republic on the Caspian Sea, has become
a pivotal global energy exporter in the past two decades. For three
consecutive years last decade, it boasted the world’s fastest growing
economy.

While Azerbaijan may be nearly 8,000 miles from Mexico, the two
countries share some similarities.

“The relationship of Azerbaijan and Mexico is a rational one. Both
are major oil producers. Both want to diversify their economies. Both
live in the shadow of big neighbors. Both have drug problems,” said S.

Frederick Starr, founder of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, a
research center affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

City Hall first signed an agreement with Azerbaijan in mid-2011 as
part of a program to seek third parties to help renovate parks and
public spaces.

Mexico City is far from the only global metropolis to build a statue
to Aliyev. According to Azerbaijani dissidents, statues have also gone
up in the capitals of Romania, Serbia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan,
as well as in Istanbul and cities in Egypt, Russia and Iraq.

Azerbaijani Ambassador Ilgar Mukhtarov, in an interview earlier this
month with the Excelsior newspaper, blamed ignorance for the protests
in Mexico City.

“They don’t really know who Heydar Aliyev is,” Mukhtarov said. “I’m
sure that with time they will find more information about him . . .

and their opinions will change.”

Depending on one’s outlook, the government in Baku, the Azerbaijani
capital, is either giving due homage to the father of the nation or
rewriting the history of a despotic figure using the deep pockets
from its oil wealth.

Following the Soviet breakup in 1991, ethnic Armenians living in
the disputed enclave of Nagorno Karabakh sought to break away from
Azerbaijan, leading to a war that killed some 30,000 people and
displaced 1 million. Despite a cease-fire, skirmishes between the
two nations break out regularly.

Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian told Mexican diplomats
this week that his nation, too, has similarities with Mexico, namely
a large diaspora and an eagerness to respect international norms.

Referring to the two monuments in Mexico City, he asked the diplomats
if they would “tolerate the attempts of Azerbaijan to replace the
rule of law with the rule of oil.”

As an outcry grew louder over the statue and a second monument this
week, City Hall installed a three-member independent panel to review
whether the projects take into account history and values important
to Mexico.

Felipe Leal, the city’s urban development and housing chief, said the
panel’s findings would be binding, even if it demands removal of the
statue and monument.

“Whatever happens, we must accept and respect (the decision),” he said.

For its second monument in the capital, Azerbaijan helped rebuild
the Plaza Tlaxcoaque in the downtown area, constructing a fountain of
dancing waters and installing a statue of a woman with uplifted arms.

A plaque notes that the statue is for the “genocide” by Armenians
in 1992 of ethnic Azeris in the town of Khojaly. It claims some 600
people were killed.

Rosario Mendoza, a wife of a retired policeman, read the plaque aloud
to her husband, suddenly looking up and saying, “This is what all
the fuss is about.”

Mendoza said she came to inspect the plaza after hearing the complaints
on radio talk shows. She noted that the plaza was an eyesore before
the renovation.

“It was really ugly. It was abandoned and dirty here before,” she
said. “Now, it’s nice.”

http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/2012/10/24/3132846/statue-of-azerbaijan-dictator.html