Armenia: Syrian Refugees Resettling In Nagorno-Karabakh

ARMENIA: SYRIAN REFUGEES RESETTLING IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH

January 24, 2013

EurasiaNet’s Weekly Digest

A growing number of Syrian-Armenians are fleeing the escalating
violence in their native land and resettling in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Since early 2012, Armenia has been accepting diaspora members seeking
to escape Syria’s civil strife. In recent months, 29 refugee families,
roughly 90 people overall, have found new homes in Karabakh’s Kashatagh
District. “There are many other Syrian-Armenians who want to move here,
but they still live in Yerevan trying to find work there.

Many of them have contacted us to ask about moving to the district,”
said Robert Matevosyan, head of district government’s Resettlement
Department.

Matevosyan, added that about half of the recently arrived refugee
families had received housing and a plot of land. The remainder were
“on their way to getting all this,” he said.

According to central government data, about 6,000 Syrian-Armenians
have arrived in Armenia since the outbreak of violence in Syria.

Overall, about 100,000 ethnic Armenians were believed to be living
in Syria at the start of 2012.

Nationalist sentiment appears to be a factor in the resettlement
aspirations of at least some of the refugees in Kashatagh. One,
55-year-old Mushegh Aroyan, stated; “patriotism drove me here. We
need to live on our land.”

A physical therapist by training, Aroyan resettled in the district town
of Kovsakan with his wife and children. Originally, the family lived
in Qamishli, a city in northeastern Syria. Initially, he described
conditions in Kovsakan as crude, but now he says the situation is
improving “little by little.”

“Our possibilities are limited, but I am still thankful,” he added. “I
have a plot of land, a house and employment. … Since September,
my wife and I have been working in Kovsakan hospital; I work as a
therapist, while she is an epidemiologist.”

Vardan Poghosyan, 29, was also driven by a sense of patriotic duty
to bring his wife and year-old daughter in late 2012 from Qamishli
to Berdzor, another town in Kashatagh. “I’ve chosen Berdzor. That’s it.

I’m going to live here,” he said. He currently works as an accountant.

“The living conditions are fine, but the salary is very low and is
barely enough to support the family, but I think everything will be
alright, I’m farming a patch of land too. I have a few hectares of
land and we have recently sowed wheat and barley,” said Poghosyan,
whose family still lives in temporary housing.

Charities in Karabakh and Armenia proper are providing assistance to
the newcomers. One initiative launched last September, called Help
Your Brother, sends humanitarian aid to Syria and raises funds for
housing construction and other resettlement necessities, said Lilit
Galstyan, a former MP and a leader of the initiative.

The Armenian government is keeping a low profile when it comes to
resettlement in Karabakh, due to the unsettled nature of the region’s
political status. Negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan on a
permanent political settlement for the territory remain stalemated.

Azerbaijani officials have issued an official note of protest and
expressed concerns about the resettlement in the Kashatagh District.

Editor’s note: Marianna Grigoryan is a freelance reporter based in
Yerevan and editor of MediaLab.am. Anahit Hayrapetyan is a freelance
photojournalist also based in Yerevan.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/66446

Ankara: Turkey Criticized For Lack Of Press Freedom

TURKEY CRITICIZED FOR LACK OF PRESS FREEDOM

ANKARA – Anatolia News Agency

The PACE report criticizes Turkey for its failure to convict ‘the
masterminds’ of the murder of journalist Hrant Dink, who was killed
on Jan 17, 2007. EPA photo Turkey has been criticized for its media
freedom stature according to a report by the Parliamentary Assembly
of the Council of Europe (PACE).

“The high number of journalists imprisoned, detained or prosecuted
has a paralyzing effect on its media environment,” the report read,
while the country was said to have “more journalists in detention
than any other State in the world.”

“In April 2012, as many as 95 journalists were in jail awaiting trial
or serving sentences after being convicted,” the report read, adding
that the number has increased since.

“The majority have been charged or convicted under laws related
to terrorism or incitement to violence or hatred, or insulting the
Turkish nation or institutions of the State.”

The report added that many of the imprisoned journalists were arrested
and charged in connection with the “Ergenekon” case into an alleged
plot to overthrow the government.

The report also referred to the murder of Turkish-Armenian journalist
Hrant Dink in 2007.

“In 2011, a man of nationalist views was sentenced to a prison sentence
of over 20 years for shooting Dink, but the masterminds of the killing
have not been convicted,” it was said.

The report listed Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Greece,
Hungary, Italy, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Macedonia, Ukraine and
United Kingdom as other countries, where incidents threatining the
media freedom are seen.

January/25/2013

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-criticized-for-lack-of-press-freedom.aspx?pageID=238&nID=39793&NewsCatID=339

Chakhalyan Released From Georgia Prison

CHAKHALYAN RELEASED FROM GEORGIA PRISON

Thursday, January 24th, 2013

Freed political prisoner Vahagn Chakhalyan (center) visits Holy
Etchmiadzin church in Tbilisi after his release

AKHALKALAK, Javakhk-Georgian authorities on Thursday released
Georgian-Armenian activist Vahagn Chakhalyan, who was serving a
10-year sentence for alleged weapons possession and inciting unrest,
his lawyers reported.

Chakhalyan was arrested by Georgian authorities on July 21, 2008. He
was given a 10-year sentence for “organization of large-scale events,
public disturbance, hooliganism and illegal possession of weapons,”
based on falsified evidence. Vahagn Chakhalyan’s case is currently
being studied at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

Chakhalyan, accompanied by friends and colleagues who were gathered
at the prison, went to the Holy Etchmiadzin Church in Tbilisi, where
he was greeted by the Primate of the Georgian Diocese Bishop Vasgen
Mirzakhanyan.

Chakhalyan was greeted at the church by Armen Gevorgyan and Ruben
Shekoyan, two Armenian political prisoners who were released on
January 13 in accordance with a parliamentary amnesty decision.

His Holiness Karekin II, Catholicos of All Armenians also spoke
to Chakhlyan by phone, sending his blessings to the newly released
activist.

Chakhalyan left the Tbilisi church and headed home to Akhalkalak,
Javakhk.

Head of the “Strong Homeland” party, Shirak Torosyan, told Yerkir
Media that Georgian-Armenian organizations, as well as the Georgian
Diocese played a large role in securing Chakhalyan’s release.

“We are encouraged by the new Georgian government’s recent release
of Vahagn Chakhalyan and other Armenian activists, from Javakahk
and across Georgia, who were improperly jailed simply for the free
expression of their ideas and aspirations,” said Armenian National
Committee of America Executive Director Aram Hamparian.

“We welcome these first signs of a more tolerant and pluralist
atmosphere in Georgia, and hope that a new, positive approach
to the nation’s ethnic and civic diversity will open the door to
the cooperative and comprehensive solutions needed to bring about
enduring improvements for the Armenian population and all of Georgia’s
citizens,” added Hamparian.

During a visit to Armenian last week, Georgia’s Prime Minister Bidzina
Ivanishvili said the “ball is now in my court,” to fulfill campaign
promises regarding the improvement of conditions for the Armenian
population of Javakhk.

Speaking to RFE/RL’s Armenian service, Ivanishvili pledged to do his
best to improve the situation in Georgia’s Javakhki region mainly
populated by Armenians. Most of them voted for his Georgian Dream
alliance in the October elections.

“The Georgian opposition has never received so many ethnic Armenian
votes before,” said Ivanishvili. “I want to again thank [Javakhk
Armenians.] I gave them many promises. I won’t list those promises
now. But I guarantee that the ball is now in my court.”

http://asbarez.com/107843/chakhalyan-released-from-georgia-prison/

Bedrosyan: Hrant’s Message And The Way Forward

BEDROSYAN: HRANT’S MESSAGE AND THE WAY FORWARD
by Raffi Bedrosyan

January 24, 2013

On the sixth anniversary of his assassination and more significantly,
on the sixth anniversary of the Turkish state’s inability or
unwillingness to find his real killers, Hrant Dink was remembered by
tens of thousands of people in many countries as well as in Turkey,
including Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, Diyarbakir, Malatya, and Bodrum.

Throughout the world, Turkish and Armenian speakers repeated his
vision and message of direct dialogue between Turks and Armenians.

Year by year, instead of gradually diminishing in numbers toward
oblivion, as is the case for other assassinated journalists in Turkey,
there is a snowballing increase in the number and intensity of people
attending the Hrant Dink commemorations, protesting and demanding
justice, as well as adopting Hrant’s message with more determination.

It is not the tiny Armenian community in Turkey, but Turks (and Kurds)
from all walks of life who have embraced Hrant as a tragic hero. The
momentum is building to declare Hrant a martyr-the first shared martyr
by the historically opposing nations of Armenians and Turks.

After being systematically brainwashed by the state with ever-changing
official versions of history, people in Turkey have now finally started
to learn the true historic facts, reasons, and consequences of 1915,
not just the Turkish version versus Armenian version.

But what exactly was Hrant’s message? He would define Armenians
and Turks as two sick people, clinical cases-Armenians suffering
from trauma (obsessed with 1915) and Turks suffering from paranoia
(fear of consequences of acknowledging 1915). He would advocate
Armenians and Turks to be each other’s doctors, with dialogue as
the only prescription. And he would clap his large hands vigorously,
exclaiming, “There is no other medicine, no other doctor, no, no, no.”

He knew dialogue would be useless if one couldn’t discuss the painful
year of 1915, but only pleasant subjects such as Turks’ and Armenians’
shared values, shared culture, shared foods like dolma and kebab. He
knew that dialogue would also be useless if one was unable to really
“listen and hear,” in addition to talk. And most importantly, he knew
that dialogue would be useless if one didn’t know the real historical
facts of 1915. After being systematically brainwashed by the state
with ever-changing official versions of history, people in Turkey
have now finally started to learn the true historic facts, reasons,
and consequences of 1915, not just the Turkish version versus Armenian
version. So, if and when there is willingness to talk and listen,
both sides can and should engage in direct dialogue, without the need
to convince third parties to pressure the other side.

Hrant had studied zoology, and he would explain that if you remove
any living organism from its natural environment, you would cause
its extinction. He would then say, “If you remove an entire people
from its land where it has lived continuously for 3,000 years, even
if you transport them with great care in ‘golden airplanes,’ this
would still be similar to taking an axe to the roots of an ancient
tree.” He didn’t need to explain 1915 with long words; in a corner
of the Agos newspaper, every week, he would place some facts about
a village or town in Anatolia-could be in west, east, north, south,
or central Anatolia-giving the Armenian and total population numbers,
the names and numbers of churches and schools there, before 1915. He
would have photos of these active Armenian churches and schools in
that village or town before 1915, and photos of these non-existent
churches or schools today, totaling more than 4,000 buildings. That
would be enough for anyone to understand the reality of 1915.

But he wouldn’t only talk about the Armenians gone or dead in 1915. He
was much more interested in talking about the Armenians who remained,
who stayed in Anatolia, who stayed and survived, but no longer as
Armenians. These were the Armenians who survived by converting to
Islam, by assuming Turkish, Kurdish, or Alawi identities. These were
the Armenian girls and boys captured or sold, kept hidden, protected
or married to Turks and Kurds. And entire Armenian villages that
converted to Islam, or stayed protected by friendly Kurdish and Alawi
leaders. Hrant was obsessed with this subject. What happened to these
people? Did they secretly keep their Armenian identity? Did they pass
it on to the next generations? Where are they now? How many are there?

If there are “hidden Armenians,” what would be the trigger for them to
“come out of hiding”?

Genocide is not a single event but a continuous process. It is not
only denial of a genocide that continues it, but also assimilation
and conversion that continue it. Scholars have recently started
defining genocide not only as the destruction of an oppressed nation,
but also the construction of the oppressor nation-using assimilation
and conversion processes. For Armenians, these processes continued
on all fronts.

Hrant didn’t or couldn’t write much about this sensitive subject,
but he was preoccupied by it, gathering stories, anecdotal evidence,
always encouraging others to find out more. Clearly, this was not
a subject that could be researched openly and scientifically, but
whenever a new revelation came out about hidden Armenians in Anatolia,
he would be greatly excited. His lawyer Fethiye Cetin’s book My
Grandmother was only an example of the fate of the hidden Armenians.

In an interview with London filmmaker Nouritsa Matossian for the
documentary “Hrant Dink: A Heart Of Two Nations,” Matossian asked him,
“Do you see Armenian faces in Anatolia?” Hrant: “Yes, often.”

Nouritsa: “Apparitions [meaning, ghosts]?” Hrant: “Apparitions and
real ones.” One could tell that Hrant, the emotional Hrant with the
biggest heart, was like a child who had a secret he could hardly keep.

The answer to the question that kept him wondering-What would be
the trigger for the hidden Armenians to come out?-came four years
too late for Hrant to witness, unfortunately. The trigger was the
reconstruction of the Diyarbakir Surp Giragos Church in 2011.

Thousands of Anatolians, young and old, Turkish and Kurdish, in
appearance and identity, returned to their Armenian roots with the
reopening of this church. Some got baptized in the church, some
changed their Turkish names to the Armenian original, some changed
their identity to Armenian but remained Muslim (a new phenomenon of
Muslim-Armenians), some started learning the Armenian language. Hrant
would have danced with joy to see an 11-year-old Kurdish girl not
only learning Armenian but also singing Armenian songs at the first
Armenian concert in the Diyarbakir Surp Giragos Church in 2012. Hrant
would have danced on the table after seeing a thousand people from
Adiyaman, Amasya, Arapkir, Dersim, Diyarbakir, Elazig, Harput, Hemshin,
Istanbul, Kastamonu, Kayseri, Malatya, Musadagh, Sason, Sinop, Sivas,
Tokat, Van, and Yozgat organize activities together and celebrate the
Surp Hagop Day in December 2012, singing Armenian songs, even though
no one knew how to speak Armenian.

Hrant was an Anatolian Armenian and wished to have the same democratic
rights as all other citizens of the state, without being excluded,
without being discriminated against, without being pressured to lose
his identity. Armenians wished to have exactly the same things 100
years ago-no more, no less. The state felt threatened, and when fear
got combined with opportunity it wiped out the Armenian identity
in Anatolia to build a Turkish identity that excluded all others,
including Greeks, Assyrians, and Kurds. The enormous transfer of
wealth and assets from Armenians to Turks has added to the fear and
paranoia of the state in facing its past. A new Turkish identity,
which does not fear diversity or minority identities, needs to be
created in Turkey in order to face both the past and the future. The
state has finally started this process with the Kurds, but not the
Armenians. The Kurds have started this process with the Armenians,
openly acknowledging their role in 1915, and starting to make amends.

It is hoped that Turks will see the light and follow them.

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2013/01/24/bedrosyan-hrants-message-and-the-way-forward/

EU will contribute the strengthening of mutual trust between sides o

EU WILL CONTRIBUTE THE STRENGTHENING OF MUTUAL TRUST BETWEEN SIDES OF NKR CONFLICT. STEFAN FULE

21:42, 24 January, 2013

YEREVAN, JANUARY 24, ARMENPRESS: European Union will continue to
contribute the settlement of frozen negotiations with the help of
its experience and opportunities.

As reports Armenpress, this was noted by European Commissioner for
Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy Å tefan Fule during
the session of Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly in Strasbourg.

“We should spare no effort to strengthen the mutual trust. Thus,
we make additional efforts in such regions as Nagorno-Karabakh and
Transnistria in order to find the resolution,” Fule said.

Armenia Delegation In Pace Presents Its Disagreements On Adopted Aze

ARMENIA DELEGATION IN PACE PRESENTS ITS DISAGREEMENTS ON ADOPTED AZERBAIJANI REPORT

19:13, 24 January, 2013

STRASBOURG, JANUARY 24, ARMENPRESS: PACE is day after day losing its
real values and has started looking for benefit instead of respecting
those values. Moreover, the process is deepening. This was noted by
the head of Armenian delegation to PACE Davit Harutyunyan in the
interview with Armenpress reporter in Strasbourg when commenting on
the decision concerning Azerbaijan in which some formulations of
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict were considered to be wrong.

On January 23 decision on “Implementation of commitments by Azerbaijan
for council of Europe” was reached. According to Davit Harutyunyan,
lobbying has greatly flourished within PACE and what about Armenian
actions against it, they have not succeeded.

“I don’t think that we should initiate something in order to put
European system on a right way. We have our commitments to those
values and if we really accept that values than we will try to
implement them in our country without internal request,” Harutyunyan
said.

He reminded of his attempt to make an initiation during last session
in order former deputies of PACE would have a right to have a lobbying
activity during 3 years.

When speaking of adopted Azerbaijani report Harutyunyan noted that
joint with delegation member Armen Rustamyan he has presented his
disagreements.

Iran To Exchange Scientific Delegations With Armenia: Iri Ambassador

IRAN TO EXCHANGE SCIENTIFIC DELEGATIONS WITH ARMENIA: IRI AMBASSADOR

16:04, 24 January, 2013

YEREVAN, JANUARY 24, ARMENPRESS. On January 24 the Minister of
Education and Science of the Republic of Armenia Armen Ashotyan hosted
the Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Ambassador of the Islamic
Republic of Iran to the Republic of Armenia Mohammad Reisi. The
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Armenia informed
“Armenpress” that Armen Ashotyan welcomed the Ambassador and stated
that within the framework of the cooperation of the two countries
education and science occupy a significant place and are among the
best means for the development of reciprocal relations. The Minister
of Education and Science of the Republic of Armenia highlighted that
the amount of investments of the state in the spheres of education
and science impressed him greatly during his recent visit to the
Islamic Republic of Iran.

In turn, Mohammad Reisi noted that the development of relations with
Armenia is of a certain importance for Iran. Mr. Ambassador stated
that recently a conference entitled “Two Cultures, Two Peoples, and
Two Religions” was held in Matenadaran and a number of guests from the
IRI President’s staff attended the conference. Among other things the
Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of
Iran to the Republic of Armenia noted that Iran is willing to organize
exchange of the scientific delegations to share the scientific and
technical achievements with fraternal Armenia.

Armenian President Thanks Tehran For Effective Mutual Cooperation Wi

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT THANKS TEHRAN FOR EFFECTIVE MUTUAL COOPERATION WITH YEREVAN

16:15 | 2013-01-24

Foriegn Policy

TEHRAN (FNA)- Armenia’s President Serzh Sargsian appreciated Tehran
for its effective mutual cooperation with Yerevan, and underlined his
country’s enthusiasm for the further expansion of ties with Iran.

Sargsian appreciated Tehran for its effective bilateral cooperation
with Yerevan during the past years.

He said on Thursday that his country attached great importance to
expansion of relations with Iran despite efforts made by the US-led
western states to reduce Tehran-Yerevan ties.

Addressing people in the city of Meghri where he went for his
presidential election’s campaign, President Sargsian said Armenia
would continue efforts to promote bilateral cooperation with Iran.

In recent years, Iran and its Northern neighbor Armenia have signed
agreements on energy cooperation and agreed to cooperate in technology
and research and to enhance ties in commerce and economy.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Sargsian pledged in December
2011 to further expand “high-level relations” between their nations
and, in particular, give new impetus to the implementation of joint
energy projects that have fallen behind schedule.

Turkey Lives Drinking The Blood Of Doves

TURKEY LIVES DRINKING THE BLOOD OF DOVES

11:28 – 19.01.2013

In 2007 it became clear once again that there are no young turks,
modern turks or conservative ones, they all are the same at all times.

And even though the founder of “Agos” daily Hrant Dink thought that
they do not kill doves in that country, but he was wrong: Turkey lives
drinking the blood of doves, it kills those who believe in its future.

January 19, 2007 is the date when one of those doves Hrant Dink was
murdered in front of his establishment.

Turks try to look polite by organizing memorial ceremonies and
visiting Dink’s tomb, where quantity of people is the only thing
stressed. However, there is a group of intelligent people in Turkey
who really mourns Hrant Dink’s death and there is no need to look
for them in the crowd, as they mourn unnoticed.

By killing Hrant Dink, Turkey’s “advanced” authorities showed what
happens to those who dare to THINK and have own ideas.

“I’m telling you, even if turks transferred Armenians by golden
planes, it still would be called GENOCIDE, as people were cut from
their roots”, said Dink.

So, how should Hrant Dink’s murder be qualified? When a person is
killed for being Armenian, for loving turkish people and for free
thinking, it can never be called simple murder.

Turkey continues denying the Armenian Genocide, however continue
committing Genocide in front of the entire world till today.

Unpunishment is what gives turks wings and “Peace” policy of powerful
states.

Sleep in fear, murder has become natural in your country. Who knows
who’s throat will be cut by the knives that you hide under your
pillows.

P.S. “Believer” turks, God is watching from above (or Allah,
for you)…

Video by Civilnet

http://www.yerkir.am/en/news/42157.htm

Azerbaijan Trying To Politicize Opening Of Stepanakert Airport – Nal

AZERBAIJAN TRYING TO POLITICIZE OPENING OF STEPANAKERT AIRPORT – NALBANDIAN

news.am
January 24, 2013 | 13:48

YEREVAN.- Azerbaijan is trying to politicize the opening of Stepanakert
airport, Armenian FM said.

Neither Armenia, nor Nagorno-Karabakh is making any steps to politicize
the issue, he told reporters on Thursday.

Azerbaijani side, on the contrary, in not honoring its commitments
to refrain from threats, although, during the meetings with the OSCE
Minsk Group, they took on obligations not to use force or threat of
force against civilian aircrafts.

Armenian side reputedly said that opening of the airport is not
related to other issues. This act is pursuing humanitarian goals.

However, Azerbaijan is not hiding the goals, openly declaring their
willingness to isolate Nagorno-Karabakh.

“They have not managed to do so and would be unable in the future,”
he emphasized.