Swedish MP: To Seek And To Tell The Truth Is Necessary For Reconcili

SWEDISH MP: TO SEEK AND TO TELL THE TRUTH IS NECESSARY FOR RECONCILIATION TO WORK
Lilit Muradyan

"Radiolur"
24.03.2010 18:05

An Armenian Genocide bill was first discussed in the Swedish Parlaiemnt
ten years ago, but it failed to pass. This time the initiative was a
success, because the Social Democratic Party thoroughly investigated
the reasons preventing the passage of the Genocide bill. On of the
main reasons was timing, President of the Social Democratic Party
Peter Weiderut told a press conference in Yerevan today.

"The argument has been that recognizing now will disturb the ongoing
process between Armenia and Turkey, as well as Turkey’s relations
with the European Union. But the only thing we know for sure is that
the longer we wait, the worse it will get. In this case the victims
have waited for 95 years," Peter Weiderut stated.

The strong reaction of Turkey could be expected, because Sweden was on
the forefront of Turkey’s accession process to the European Union. And
we’ll continue to be, because Turkey belongs in Europe."

When Turkey is able to deal better with the dark side of its history,
it will have a much stronger position in the relations with the
European Union, Peter Weiderut stated.

"We are filly aware that this decision by the Swedish Parliament
two weeks ago in the short term will create difficulties between
Armenia and Turkey. But this decision is not about favoring one
country’s reading of history over another country. It is based on
the understanding that solid future policy for human rights and
international law has to be based on a trustworthy description of
history. To seek and tell the truth is necessary for reconciliation
to work," Peter Weiderut

Peter Weiderut expressed hope that all stakeholders involved,
particularly the Armenians and Turks, would make use of this decision
of the Swedish Parliament in their dialogue towards reconciliations.

Total Number Of VivaCell-MTS Subscribers Reaches 2.1 Million

TOTAL NUMBER OF VIVACELL-MTS SUBSCRIBERS REACHES 2.1 MILLION

PanARMENIAN.Net
24.03.2010 14:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The subscriber base of VivaCell-MTS increased by
2.5 per cent as compared with the last year’s data.

As of February 28, the total number of subscribers reached 2.1 million,
VivaCell-MTS press office reported.

Consolidated number of subscribers of Mobile TeleSystems reached
97.76 million.

VivaCell company is a subsidiary of MTS, a leading telecommunications
operator in Russia and CIS countries.

Hearings On Efficiency Of Struggle Against Illegal Circulation Of Dr

HEARINGS ON EFFICIENCY OF STRUGGLE AGAINST ILLEGAL CIRCULATION OF DRUGS TO BE ORGANIZED IN NA

Noyan Tapan
March 24, 2010

YEREVAN, MARCH 24, NOYAN TAPAN. RA NA Standing Committee on Defence,
National Security and Internal Affairs on March 31 organizes
parliamentary hearings on the subject Efficiency of Struggle against
Crimes of Illegal Circulation of Drugs. Noyan Tapan was informed
about it by the RA NA Press Service.

Exhibition-Fair Of Indian Products To Be Conducted In Yerevan

EXHIBITION-FAIR OF INDIAN PRODUCTS TO BE CONDUCTED IN YEREVAN

533/lang/en
2010-03-23
YEREVAN

An exhibition-fair of Indian products will be conducted in May in
Yerevan. Head of the Business Development Department of the Armenian
Chamber of Commerce and Industry Masis Sargsyan told Armenpress that
bijouterie, knitted garments, leather items, accessories for herb
medicine, food, clothes, handmade works, cuisine equipments, etc. will
be presented at the exhibition by numerous companies from India.

According to M. Sargsyan, the organization of such exhibition is of
great importance, as it enables to get acquainted with the production
of the given country, its quality. Indian products are singled out
by low prices.

The Indian side has already organized several such exhibition in
Yerevan. The organizers of this regular event are the Armenia Chamber
of Commerce and Industry and the Indian Embassy in Armenia.

http://www.armenpress.am/news/more/id/595

Adam, Er, Atom Still Smashing

ADAM, ER, ATOM STILL SMASHING
Shinan Govani

National Post
s/story.html?id=f24130e9-3d7b-4a8f-939e-207fd8d389 f8
March 22 2010
Canada

‘Not bad for an Armenian boy from Canada, huh?" quipped Atom Egoyan
the other night to Vanity Fair. This, as he basked in the matinee
idol role of his own making, swallowing up all the tony testimonials,
the gilded praises the Toast of New York carpet roll-out.

The magazine’s correspondent was impressed, too — although, more
with "Adam Egoyan," not Atom, as George Wayne went about calling him
-twice! -in a write-up that later followed on Vanityfair.com.Ah yes,
that inevitable splash of water that so often follows the mirage of
Hollywood insider-dom. A cantankerous yet relentless cliche, this
idea that as much as you’ve made it, someone’s gonna come along and
remind you that you haven’t quite made it high enough.

"Adam Egoyan" had, alas, ducked into Gotham for the New York premiere
of his hot murky melodrama Chloe. And premieres calling for parties,
it was to the Thompson Hotel in the Lower East Side where the
auteur later headed, and where, flanked by his hot murky leading
ladies, Julianne Moore and Amanda Seyfried, he was the subject of
nomenclature-assassination by the very bible of celebrity.

The bright side being what it is, though, George Wayne did at least
come away saying nice things about the movie, co-starring Liam Neeson.

"Oozing with style and elan," he writes of Chloe. "Sleek, chic and
futuristic…" he chirps, giving an almost unnecessary hat-tip to
the filmic world of Toronto. Quote: "Toronto’s trendy Yorkville
neighbourhood, where most of the film is set, has never looked cooler."

This much, yes, is even clear from the trailer, I have to say. Whether
it’s Atom or Adam or Otto, this is a director who not only "pushes
the envelope of Sapphic love," as Wayne writes, but he’s churned out
a movie that pushes the envelope of Toronto as a tableau. I, for one,
continuously get quite the kick out of seeing College Street’s good,
ol’ Cafe Diplomatico up on the screen. "The Dip," being where the
wide-eyed Seyfriend borrows some sugar from a ho-hum Neeson, and
where a tangled web of deception first begins to weave.

SCENE! HEARD!

– Eating Machine Josh Josephson — Toronto’s leading optometrist-cum
foodie, and also owner of The Cookbook Store — is telling all
about the city’s most in-the-know brisket sandwich. Available only
on Wednesdays during lunch at Nota Bene, on Queen, it’s earned an
in-writing thumbs-up from the good doctor on PostCit.com"Blew me
away," he observed — although he could do without the cheddar! "You
would have to be French, or Brazilian, or from the Midwest United
States to even consider cheese with a brisket sandwich," he then
tough-love huffed.

– It wasn’t just the full-on sundae station (complete with myriad
toppings) that had people’s "sweet tooths" going at the Hugo Boss
flagship one night recently — there was also all those scores of
candy-coated ladies and gents! Among those accounted for at a party
held to back-slap those who appeared on the Post’s recent Worthy
30 lists? Eligibles such as Flare’s Mosha Lundstrom Halbert, "It"
deli-man Zane Caplansky, the modelicious Monika Schnarre, naturopath
John Dempster, skin-conjurer Sandy Skotnicki-Grant and, oh, that
Vicky Cristina Barcelona-loving developer Ken Zuckerman.

– Crafty Canadian courtier Paul Hardy, set to drop his latest
collection here on Wednesday, has plans to follow up with a post-show
party at Le Select Bistro.

– Our undisputed supermodel Daria Werbowy will strut for a good cause
in Toronto at a charity luncheon/fashion show, happening tomorrow at
Arcadian Court in aid of Ovarian Cancer Canada.

http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnist

Thomas Hammarberg: "More Needs To Be Done"

THOMAS HAMMARBERG: "MORE NEEDS TO BE DONE"

2/thomas-hammarberg
08:24 pm | March 22, 2010

Politics

"Historical controversies should not hold human rights hostage.

One-sided interpretations or distortions of historical events have
sometimes led to discrimination of minorities, xenophobia and renewal
of conflict. It is crucial to establish an honest search for the
truth" said Thomas Hammarberg, Council of Europe Commissioner for
Human Rights, in his latest Viewpoint published today.

Gross human rights violations in the past continue to affect relations
in today’s Europe. In some cases, genuine knowledge of history has
facilitated understanding, tolerance and trust between individuals and
peoples. However, some serious atrocities are denied or trivialised,
which has created new tensions.

"Coming to terms with history is always essential, but particularly
crucial in cases of massive atrocities and human rights violations.

Such crimes cannot be ignored without severe consequences. Prolonged
impunity or lack of acknowledgment over several generations tends
to create bitterness among those who identify themselves with the
victims. This, in turn, can poison relations between people who
were not even born when the events in question took place" said the
Commissioner.

Even more controversial has been – and is – the very description of the
enforced mass displacement, the ensuing deaths as well as the outright
killings of ethnic Armenians in 1915 under the Ottoman Empire. Even
though this happened before the creation of the new Turkish republic,
there has been unwillingness there to discuss these crimes. Writers
and journalists who raised the issue were brought to trial. Now,
the first steps towards recognising the facts have at long last been
taken – through academic discussions – but more needs to be done.

Atrocities in the past must be recognised, documented and learned
from – but not distorted or misused for political purposes."

http://a1plus.am/en/politics/2010/03/2

Azerbaijan Recognized NKR’s Independence In 1994: Shavarsh Kocharyan

AZERBAIJAN RECOGNIZED NKR’S INDEPENDENCE IN 1994: SHAVARSH KOCHARYAN

Tert.am
22.03.10

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev uttered the usual monologue about a
dialogue that did not take place, RA Deputy Foreign Minister Shavarsh
Kocharyan told local news agency Mediamax, while commenting on several
of Aliyev’s statements on settling the Nagorno-Karabakh (NKR) conflict.

"According to that monologue, Azerbaijan has in principle finished
the talks conducted with itself and what it has achieved generally is
in Azerbaijan’s interests. … More likely he [Aliyev] cannot reach
an agreement even with himself," Kocharyan was reported as saying.

In his words, after having constitutionally established the inability
to replace a presidency that has been inherited, Aliyev has now
retained his right to speak on behalf of time, international law,
mediators, and the people of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh.

"Baku pretends as if it does not understand that there is no
alternative to Nagorno-Karabakh’s independence be it now, in a
hundred years or ever. The Republic of Nagorno Karabakh is an
established state that meets the norms of international law, one
that has been able to resist Azerbaijani aggression and its policy
of ethnic cleansing. Yet Azerbaijan was obliged to sign a ceasefire
[agreement] with Nagorno-Karabakh and recognize its independence in
1994," said Kocharyan.

According to Kocharyan, Aliyev’s statements are strong proof that
he is not ready for constructive dialogue. Azerbaijan, still making
bellicose statements, now has the chance to withdraw its troops from
the occupied NKR territories and to begin negotiations with NKR till
the balloon of illusions and distortions pops, said Kocharyan.

100 Steps Aimed At Decentralization Of Armenian Economy: Former Prim

100 STEPS AIMED AT DECENTRALIZATION OF ARMENIAN ECONOMY: FORMER PRIME MINISTER

ARKA
March 19, 2010

YEREVAN, March 19, /ARKA/. Former prime minister Hrant Bagratian told
a news conference today that the economic manifesto of the opposition
Armenian National Congress, called ‘100 Steps’ has been developed to
decentralize Armenian economy.

The 15-page program published late last month was developed by a team
of economists led by Hrant Bagratian. It lists 100 policy measures
which the Armenian National Congress said would end the monopolization
of Armenian economy, improve the country’s business environment and
ensure a more fair distribution of wealth among its citizens.

According to Hrant Bagratian, ‘100 Steps’ differs radically from the
government’s anti-crisis program.

"Our plan of actions is aimed at preventing a dozen of oligarchs from
receiving huge profits from monopolized imports,’ he said, adding
that 55% of Armenia’s GDP is owned by 10 families. For comparison,
he said, in the United States only 1.9% of economy is controlled by
large businesses, in Russia the figure is 3.7%. "This makes any talk
about market economy in Armenia meaningless,’ he said.

Bagratian said the Armenian National Congress wants to shift the main
tax burden from small and medium-sized enterprises to a handful of
government-linked oligarchs through the introduction of a progressive
income tax scale as well as sharp increases in other taxes paid by
the wealthiest Armenians.

Head of World Bank Yerevan Office, Aristomene Varoudakis, praised
lately the content of the program , saying it has a lot of good
proposals. He also suggested starting open debates on the program,
promising World Bank ‘s support.

Armenian and Greek YPs Hold Event with Journalist Charles Villeneuve

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x118
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:

PRESS RELEASE

Friday, March 19, 2010

Armenian and Greek Young Professionals Hold Event with Journalist
Charles Villeneuve

Armenians and Greeks were honored on November 4, 2009 by the Ricard
Foundation in Paris during a captivating conference given by journalist
Charles Villeneuve, as he talked about his long and interesting career.
This event was the first collaboration between Young Professionals (YP)
Paris and Greek Paris, comprised of the young Armenian and Greek working
youth of Paris.

Charles Villeneuve first spoke of his origins, coming from an Armenian
mother, Celina Seropian, exiled to Aleppo, Syria, and a French father
expatriated in Greece. He also talked about his exciting experiences
with radio and television, the events he would have liked to cover, the
presidency of Paris Saint-Germain soccer club, from which he recently
resigned, and the media world. Future projects include interviewing
important French and foreign political leaders.

The conference was followed by a cocktail event for networking between
Armenians and Greeks. YP Paris, with a membership of close to 450 young
professionals, aims to focus on employment opportunities and sources of
financing for aspiring entrepreneurs.

Established in 1906, AGBU () is the world’s largest
non-profit Armenian organization. Headquartered in New York City, AGBU
preserves and promotes the Armenian identity and heritage through
educational, cultural and humanitarian program, annually touching the
lives of some 400,000 Armenians around the world.

For more information about AGBU and its worldwide programs, please visit

www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org.

The United States And Turkey: A View From The Obama Administration

THE UNITED STATES AND TURKEY: A VIEW FROM THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
By Philip H. Gordon

US Department of State
6.htm
March 17 2010

Thank you, Strobe. It’s a great pleasure to be back at Brookings to
deliver the sixth annual Sakip Sabanci Lecture. This is a homecoming
of sorts for me and it’s great to see so many good friends here today.

I’ve worked with Strobe both in the U.S. government, during the
Clinton administration, and outside of it, during my tenure at
Brookings. Throughout that time, he has been a constant source
of wise counsel and clear-headed leadership. And though the Obama
Administration has done its best to deplete the ranks of his staff,
I am happy to see that Brookings under his direction is still thriving.

Thank you for inviting me here today.

I’m especially pleased to be giving the Sabanci Lecture – an event I
am proud to say I played a part in conceiving six years ago, to help
foster a dialogue in Washington with and about Turkey. I’m happy to
see you have maintained the tradition of including Sabanci University
students and faculty by video link – something which makes this lecture
a unique event – and I look forward to hearing from colleagues in
Istanbul today. I extend my best regards to Guler Sabanci who will
be participating in the discussion from that end.

The growth and success of Sabanci University in Istanbul and this
lecture in Washington are both testament to the vision of the man
for whom they are named: Sakip Sabanci. A successful businessman
and great philanthropist, his contributions to the intellectual,
cultural, and economic life of his country were major forces behind
Turkey’s continued development and modernization. The Sabanci Lecture
was established to highlight Turkey’s increasing importance in world
affairs and to promote Turkey’s reform and integration into Europe –
causes which Sakip Sabanci championed. I think the past several years
have only confirmed the importance of this forum and of these issues,
and that is precisely what I want to talk about today.

The topic that I wish to address is the relationship between the
United States and Turkey – a dynamic and multi-faceted relationship
that is beneficial to both our countries. This could hardly be a more
important or timely subject and this is a particularly appropriate
moment to reflect on it. Almost a year ago, President Obama traveled to
Turkey during his first overseas trip. He went to deliver a message
of partnership, saying "Turkey and the United States must stand
together – and work together – to overcome the challenges of our
time." Turkey and the United States have been partners for decades
and that partnership is as important today as it has ever been. When
Secretary Clinton went on her first trip to Europe, she too made
a point of going to Turkey and she spoke of Turkey as a critical
partner. The reasons why the President and the Secretary traveled
to Turkey early in this administration’s term are the reasons why I
want to talk about Turkey today – because we believe that an engaged,
active, and cooperative relationship with Turkey is an important
interest of the United States. As the President put it when he met
Prime Minister Erdogan at the White House in December, "given Turkey’s
history as a secular democratic state that respects the rule of law,
but is also a majority Muslim nation, it plays a critical role … in
helping to shape mutual understanding and stability and peace not
only in its neighborhood but around the world."

Few countries play such a crucial role in such a diverse set of
important areas. How many countries have borders with as diverse an
array of countries as Turkey – Greece, Bulgaria, Georgia, Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Iran, Iraq, and Syria. With its combination of strategic,
economic, and cultural links, Turkey’s influence touches such vital
concerns of both our countries as the stability of the Middle East
and relations with the broader Islamic world, relations with the
Caucasus and Black Sea region, the transit of energy from the Caspian
Basin to Europe, the security and development of Iraq, Afghanistan,
and Pakistan, and the maintenance of strong ties to Europe and the
Trans-Atlantic alliance. The geography that I have just mentioned
spans some of the most sensitive and significant parts of the globe
and in every one of these areas U.S.-Turkish cooperation can be a
force for progress.

This is also a timely moment to be addressing the U.S.-Turkish
relationship because the dynamic nature of Turkey is attracting
the world’s attention in new ways. Domestically, debates about
civil-military relations, and about the role of religion in society,
have generated enormous interest abroad, and are followed closely
in the United States. Economically, the last decade has seen Turkey
display one of the highest rates of economic growth in the world –
making Turkey one of the 20 largest global economies. In foreign
affairs, Turkey has pursued an active foreign policy that has seen
it interacting more intensively than ever with countries all across
its neighborhood and beyond. Whenever and wherever I travel, which
is a lot these days, one of the sentences I hear most often is "Ahmet
Davutoglu was just here."

Let us be frank: the dynamism we see in Turkey has raised questions in
the minds of some observers about where Turkey is heading, and that too
is a reason why this is a timely topic. It is worth addressing these
questions squarely. Though phrased in different ways, the questions
all eventually boil down to a single concern: Is Turkey turning away
from the West? We do not see it that way. Turkey is an integral part
of the Euro-Atlantic alliance and has been for decades.

Throughout that time it has always maintained strong relations
with its neighbors to the west as well as its neighbors to the
east. It is also reaching out in new ways. Turkey has always had
multiple identities. But what binds the United States and Turkey
together are shared interests, shared values, and a commitment to
partnership. We believe that Turkey is and wants to remain anchored
in the Euro-Atlantic community.

However, the fact that some have questioned the strength of our ties
does highlight an important issue. The relationship, which was much
easier to justify when we faced a shared Soviet threat, requires hard
work and attention – on both sides. Today, the global challenges we
face are more varied and diffuse than they were during the Cold War.

In this new environment, those of us who believe in the relationship
have to make a special effort to explain the enduring value of the
partnership between the United States and Turkey. Indeed, that enduring
value is something I want to underscore today. On nearly every vital
issue we face, the United States benefits from having Turkey as an
engaged and supportive partner. The reverse is also true: on nearly
every issue that is critical to Turkey’s future, the United States
plays an enormously important role as a trusted friend and ally.

The United States and Turkey may no longer be fighting the Cold War
or containing Iraq, but we are working closely together in a number
of important ways. In Afghanistan, the United States and Turkey
are working together to offer a better life to the Afghan people
by giving them the training and tools they need to build security
and grow their economy. The United States and Turkey are working
together closely on an action plan for joint assistance to the Afghan
people. So far we have worked together with Turkey to develop key
economic sectors in Wardak, and soon we plan to begin cooperative
projects on infrastructure and health care in Kabul. Turkey is a
major contributor of forces and expertise to the NATO mission in
Afghanistan and its soldiers support the Afghan security forces’
effort to secure the capital region of the country.

In Iraq, the Turkish government’s commitment to high-level strategic
cooperation with the government in Baghdad, as well as the improvement
in its relations with Iraqi Kurds, have been positive contributions
to Iraq’s stabilization. The Iraqis just completed national elections
with very robust turnout. Now the negotiations on forming a government
are about to begin. It is important that all those with a stake in
Iraq’s path to stability allow the Iraqis to make their own decisions
and encourage their Iraqi leaders to support a process that will lead
to formation of an effective government. Iraq is now Turkey’s second
largest export market after Germany and the two countries’ growing
economic and commercial relationship is yet another reason it is in
Turkey’s interest to build a mutually beneficial relationship with
Iraq. The United States and Turkey are also cooperating closely on
counter-terrorism, both to fight international terrorist groups like
al-Qa’ida and to battle the PKK terrorist organization in the region.

In addition, Turkey is in the process of negotiating its accession
to the European Union. While we recognize the decision is not ours,
the United States continues to strongly support Turkish accession and
urges Turkey to continue the democratic and political reforms necessary
to complete the membership process. Further progress on promoting human
rights and religious freedom, including important steps like reopening
the Halki Seminary, will move Turkey’s EU prospects forward. These
reforms do more than further Turkey’s EU accession bid – they also
make Turkey an even more democratic and modern nation. The EU has its
own part to play. It can help ensure that Turkey’s progress continues
by making clear that the door to the EU will be open to a Turkey that
fulfills the requirements for EU membership. We remain convinced that
a Turkey that meets EU membership criteria would be good for the EU,
and that Turkey’s effort to meet those criteria is good for Turkey.

Turkey is already playing a crucial role as a transit hub for energy
to the rest of Europe – heating homes, lighting offices, and powering
industry across the continent. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline,
which came online in 2006, delivers one million barrels per day
of petroleum and in 2007 the South Caucasus pipeline began bringing
natural gas from Azerbaijan to Turkey. What these various projects and
a variety of proposed future initiatives show is that Turkey will be
an integral part of meeting Europe’s energy needs and providing for
Europe’s energy security.

While Turkey plays an active role on the world’s stage as a European
power, it has also been equally active in reaching out to its immediate
neighbors. We are supportive of the Turkish government’s concept of
pursuing a policy of "zero problems" with its neighbors.

This is a lofty and admirable goal. Bringing it to fruition, as
everyone recognizes, will require difficult compromises and brave
leadership.

Turkey’s work with Armenia to normalize relations demonstrates both
the promise and the difficulty of this enterprise. It holds out the
prospect of positive transformative change in the region. The steps
taken so far by both countries have shown vision and courage. Last
October, in the presence of Secretary Clinton, the foreign ministers
of France, Russia, and Switzerland, and the EU High Representative, the
Turkish and Armenian Foreign Ministers signed protocols on normalizing
and developing their relations. We believe that the implementation
of these protocols – leading to diplomatic ties and open borders –
would be a historic development that would benefit both countries
and contribute to security and economic prosperity throughout the
region. We appreciate the effort that has been made so far and urge
both countries to ratify the protocols without preconditions and
as soon as possible, a point President Obama made on the phone to
President Gul just two weeks ago. Let us not squander the historic
progress already made. Ratification will bring valuable benefits to
both Turkey and Armenia. All who are invested in the process must do
their part to ensure that it moves forward.

Let me address in this context the resolution recently considered
by the House Foreign Affairs Committee. As President Obama has said,
our interest remains a full, frank, and just acknowledgement of the
facts related to the events of 1915. But the best way to do that,
we believe, is for the Armenian and Turkish people themselves to
address this history as part of their efforts to build a future of
shared peace and prosperity. As both Secretary Clinton and Secretary
Gates have indicated, further Congressional action could impede
progress on the normalization of relations and for that reason we
oppose this resolution.

Another regional issue where Turkey can play a productive role is
Cyprus. The United States continues to encourage the negotiations
between the two communities under the auspices of the UN Secretary
General. Turkey and Greece can also play constructive roles in helping
the Cypriot parties toward a lasting solution to their differences. We
welcome as well the positive dynamic in the relationship between
the Turkish and Greek Prime Ministers – something that Greek Prime
Minister Papandreou, who was just on this stage, spoke about when he
was in Washington last week. We commend both Cypriot leaders for their
efforts and urge them to seize this window of opportunity to pursue
negotiations leading to a settlement that reunifies Cyprus into a
bi-zonal and bi-communal federation. Prime Minister Erdogan’s recent
and very constructive comments to the Cypriot press endorsing such
a solution were very welcome and should help bring this outcome about.

These are all issues where Turkish leadership can be constructively
applied to bring about a more peaceful and prosperous neighborhood.

But it is important to remember that while the concept of "zero
problems" with neighbors is a good one, it should not be pursued
uncritically or at any price. As one of the world’s leading states,
Turkey has international responsibilities that extend beyond its
immediate neighborhood. With respect to Iran, while the international
community has sought to present a single, coordinated message to
Iran’s government, Turkey has at times sounded a different note. We
know Turkey shares our concerns about the prospect of a nuclear-armed
Iran and is supportive of international efforts to reach a diplomatic
solution to concerns with Iran’s nuclear program. But we also
believe it to be vitally important that we avoid actions that could
potentially undermine or complicate our shared goal of a peaceful
diplomatic resolution of this issue. We do not believe that Turkey’s
decision to abstain in the IAEA last November helped this goal and
we hope that Turkey will join the broad group of nations in the UN
Security Council who are seeking to hold Iran to its IAEA and Security
Council obligations.

Nor should improved relations with Turkey’s Middle Eastern neighbors
come at the expense of its historic allies such as Israel. We are
hopeful that Turkey and Israel will work to reinforce these ties, even
as Turkey develops its relationships with other states of the region.

Turkey has long had good, even special, ties with Israel, and this
has given Turkey an important opportunity to support peace in the
Middle East – a cause that we all support.

We in the United States also pay close attention to developments within
Turkey. Obviously, decisions about Turkey’s political future can and
must be made only by Turks within the context of Turkey’s democratic
system. But as a friend we care about the ongoing development of
successful, open democracy in Turkey. The process of reform and
modernization that is so vital to Turkey’s future remains an important
priority. Turkey’s leaders recognize this and have taken bold steps
to foster a more cohesive country. The Democratization Project, which
aims to protect the rights of Kurds and other minority groups, is a
major step in Turkish history. We applaud this initiative and encourage
Turkey to continue to move forward. The success of this effort would go
a long way in securing Turkish democracy, promoting reconciliation in
Turkish society, as well as advancing Turkey’s case for EU accession.

But Turkey must also be careful to ensure that its hard-won successes
in building a secular state and strong democratic system are sustained
into the future. Media freedom is one of the bedrocks of a democratic
society and no actions should be taken that appear to undermine
the ability of the press to do its vital job. The rule of law is
another essential element of true democracy and for that reason it
is important that investigations or court proceedings, especially on
politically sensitive cases, must be open and fully respect Turkish
law. The ability of political parties to function freely is crucial as
well – in a democracy, political parties should not fear being closed
down. The citizens of Turkey deserve nothing less. The development of
democratic politics is one of modern Turkey’s greatest achievements
and dealing with difficult issues such as these in an exemplary
manner will demonstrate to its people and to the world the strength
and vitality of Turkish democracy.

Let me end where I began: by describing what it is that I believe binds
the United States and Turkey together. When you consider all of the
things I have talked about today – from Afghanistan to the Middle East
to the European Union to energy security – it becomes clear that the
alliance between the United States and Turkey is founded on a firm base
of diverse and deep shared interests. And when one considers so many
of the pressing challenges in the world today, it becomes equally clear
that U.S.-Turkish cooperation can be a force for immense progress.

But our relationship is based on much more than a calculation of
interest – it is rooted in shared values and a shared vision. The
United States and Turkey have made a choice to establish a partnership,
and with that partnership comes important responsibilities on both
sides. As two large countries with broad and diverse interests,
we will not always see eye-to-eye on every issue but we must never
forget the larger outlook that we share. A vision of a democratic
Turkey, with a vibrant economy, integrated into Europe, and with
good relations with its neighbors, is a vision that has motivated
generations of Turkish leaders. It is a vision we share too, and we
want to help Turkey achieve it.

Thank you.

http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/2010/13844