Days Of Lebanese Literature To Be Held In Armenia

DAYS OF LEBANESE LITERATURE TO BE HELD IN ARMENIA

ArmRadio.am
30.06.2006 12:37

By the end of the year days of Lebanese literature will be held will
be held in Armenia. The negotiations in this direction are currently
under way between the Ministries of Culture of Armenia and Lebanon.

President of the Union of Writers of Armenia Levon Ananyan informs
that before the start of the arrangements Armenian writer Avetik
Isahakyan’s monument will be officially raised in Beirut.

In the framework of the arrangements, Lebanese writers will visit
Armenia.

Next year it is envisage to hold days of Armenian literature in
Lebanon.

Nay To Referendum? What About Autonomy?

NAY TO REFERENDUM? WHAT ABOUT AUTONOMY?
By Aghavni Harutyunian

AZG Armenian Daily
30/06/2006

Aliyev’s Populism Couched in Same Words

Granting Nagorno Karabakh high status of autonomy and "agreeing to
deployment of international peacekeepers was a major concession on
Azerbaijan’s part," Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev stated. "It
can be considered a concession that we make it possible to deploy
peacekeeping forces. We can be ready for that though it’s not easy for
us as there are no foreign military detachments in our country. This
is our fundamental stance," Aliyev stated.

On the other hand, "granting Nagorno Karabakh the high status of
autonomy is a big concession as previously it used to enjoy the
status of autonomous oblast. I am stating that we are ready to apply
the highest status of autonomy that the world knows. There can be no
other concession," Aliyev said.

Though this stance is not something new, it’s interesting that
the Azerbaijani president is speaking of impossibility to make
other concessions. What does it mean? Is there a proposal of other
concessions too that are kept under wraps with the unpublicized
elements of the framework agreement? In the meantime it’s obvious
that such deployment of international peacekeepers seems to be,
in Aliyev’s words, a concession whereas it will simply serve as a
guarantee for carrying out reached agreements (concessions).

Russian Interior Minister Downplays Anti-Armenian Violence

RUSSIAN INTERIOR MINISTER DOWNPLAYS ANTI-ARMENIAN VIOLENCE
By Karine Kalantarian

Radio Liberty. Czech Rep.
June 28 2006

Russian Interior Minister Rashid Nurgaliev strongly disagreed on
Wednesday with a growing perception in Armenia that his country
has become a hotbed of racist violence against Armenians and other
non-Slavic immigrants.

Speaking during a visit to Yerevan, Nurgaliev claimed that the number
of Armenian nationals or ethnic Armenian citizens of Russians murdered
for racist motives in recent month is grossly exaggerated by media
and non-governmental organizations.

Russian human rights groups have reported at least six such killings
this year. The most recent of those crimes, reported in late May,
sparked a fresh outcry in Armenia, putting the Armenian government
under greater pressure to raise the issue with Moscow. President
Robert Kocharian called for tougher action against Russian neo-Nazi
groups widely blamed for the racist attacks during a meeting with a
visiting senior Kremlin official last week.

In a related development, a delegation of senior officials from the
Armenian Foreign Ministry is scheduled to hold a special meeting on
the issue with their Russian counterparts in Moscow on Thursday.

Nurgaliev made it clear, however, that the Russian law-enforcement
authorities do not regard racist attacks on Armenians and other people
from the Caucasus and Central Asia as a serious problem. He said the
Russian police registered four killings of Armenian citizens during
the first quarter of this year and has already solved two of them. He
claimed that none of them was racially motivated.

"Investigators have not found any facts connected with ethnic disputes,
religious or ethnic affiliation," Nurgaliev told reporters.

"There were mainly mercenary motives involved." It is also not uncommon
for Armenian residents of Russia to be murdered by their co-ethnics,
he said.

Nurgaliev also expressed dismay at an unprecedented amount of
anti-Russian rhetoric voiced by the Armenian press in recent months in
connection with the reported hate crimes. "Many people are trying to
drive a wedge between Armenia and Russia for political considerations,"
he said.

The Russian minister was speaking at a brief joint news conference
with his Armenian opposite number, Hayk Harutiunian, following
a regular meeting of the leaderships of Armenia’s and Russia’s
police services. Officials said that the meeting focused on a joint
Russian-Armenian fight against economic crimes and illegal immigration,
suggesting that the racist attacks were not on the agenda.

An official press release on Kocharian’s separate meeting with
Nurgaliev also made no mention of the issue. Kocharian was instead
quoted as praising the "effective cooperation of the Russian and
Armenian law-enforcement bodies."

Nominee For U.S. Envoy To Armenia Rejects Demands He Call 1915 Ottom

NOMINEE FOR U.S. ENVOY TO ARMENIA REJECTS DEMANDS HE CALL 1915 OTTOMAN ACTION ‘GENOCIDE’
William C. Mann

AP Worldstream
Jun 28, 2006

Senators failed to persuade the nominee for U.S. ambassador to Armenia
to describe the deaths of 1.5 million Armenians last century as
"genocide."

"I have not received any kind of written instruction about this,"
Ambassador-designate Richard E. Hoagland said Wednesday. "I simply
have studied the president’s policy. I’ve studied the background papers
on the policy. And my responsibility is to support the president."

The Bush administration does not question that Turkish troops in the
dying days of the Ottoman Empire killed or drove from their homes
1.5 million Armenians starting in 1915. In a presidential message on
the 91st anniversary April 24, President George W. Bush called it
"a terrible chapter of history" that "remains a source of pain for
people in Armenia and for all those who believe in freedom, tolerance
and the dignity and value of every human life."

As in previous such messages, he omitted using the word "genocide"
to describe what happened.

Turkey strongly objects to the use of the word "genocide" to describe
what happened in 1915. U.S. policymakers are wary of antagonizing an
important strategic NATO ally.

Bush is ordering home the current ambassador in Yerevan, John Evans,
two years into the normal three-year diplomatic term. In announcing
his recall last month, the White House gave no reason and praised
Evans for his service. Last Sunday was his second anniversary in the
Armenian capital.

In February 2005, Evans told Armenian-Americans, "The Armenian genocide
was the first genocide of the 20th century."

Sixty members of the House of Representatives sent a letter to
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice protesting that Evans was being
punished for his reference to "genocide." In a separate letter,
Democratic Sens. Edward Kennedy and John Kerry of Massachusetts
demanded an explanation from Rice for Evans’ recall.

Sen. George Allen, a Virginia Republican who presided over Wednesday’s
confirmation hearing for Hoagland before the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, recalled remarks made by Adolf Hitler on the eve of World
War II.

Allen referred to an August 1939 meeting between the Nazi leader
and his generals, some of whom protested that the world would not
stand for the slaughter of civilians during the coming war. Allen
paraphrased Hitler: "Who remembers the Armenians"

Another Republican senator, Norm Coleman of Minnesota, told Hoagland
that the State Department was putting him in a difficult position.

"It’s almost absurd to sit here and you can’t utter the word
genocide. The president’s statement that he issues every year is a
description of genocide," Coleman said.

He said former President Ronald Reagan spoke of the Armenian genocide
in an official proclamation in 1981, and even Bush used the word in
2000, when he was governor of Texas and campaigning for president.

"Now we have ambassadors who can’t say, use a word, just a word,"
Coleman said. "But words have meaning. Words have meaning, and it
says to the people, `I understand what you’ve been through.’"

The word "genocide" did not exist in 1915. Its first legal application
was in the indictments of the 1945-46 Nuremberg Tribunal for Nazi
war criminals.

"I fully agree that the events that occurred in 1915 and following
were of historic proportions, as I said, well-documented, horrific,
horrifying," said Hoagland, who is currently the ambassador to
Tajikistan.

He quoted Sen. Paul Sarbanes, a Maryland Democrat, who read a
statement about the situation, that "hundreds of valleys (were)
devastated, no family untouched. It was historic. It was a tragedy,
everyone fully agrees with that, sir."

The events occurred during the expulsion of ethnic Armenians from
eastern Turkey into Syria in 1915-16. Turkish officials traditionally
have maintained that 300,000 died.

Whether the Ottoman Turks waged a genocide against the Armenians has
colored relations between the two neighbors for decades, even while
Armenia was a republic of the Soviet Union. Armenian terrorists, mainly
members of the Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia,
roamed through Europe and the United States in the 1970s and 1980s
and claimed more than 60 attacks against Turkish targets. The army
claimed the campaign killed 30 Turkish diplomats and dependents.

"Metaksia" Theatre Festival To Be Held In Armenia On July 2-8

"METAKSIA" THEATRE FESTIVAL TO BE HELD IN ARMENIA ON JULY 2-8

Yerevan, July 28. ArmInfo. On July 2-8, "Metaksia" first republican
theatre festival will be held in Armenia. The festival is dedicated to
80th anniversary of the outstanding Armenian actress Metaksia Simonian.

In the course of today’s press conference, Vahe Shahverdian, art
director of the Yerevan State Academic Theatre after G. Soundoukian,
said that 15 performances will be staged at the Armenian theatres
within the framework of the festival.

It’s worth mentioning that by RA Government decision, the anniversaries
of nine prominent Armenian art workers will be celebrated, namely
the anniversaries of Hakob Hovnatanian, Dmitriy nalbandian, Grigor
Khanjian, Mkrtich Armen, Hakob Gyurjian, Metaksia Simonian, Makar
Yekmalian, Tatevik Sazandarian and Tigran Levonian.

Long, Hot Summer – Border enforcement and the deaths of illegal imm.

National Review Online

June 09, 2006

Long, Hot Summer
Border enforcement and the deaths of illegal immigrants.

By Mark Krikorian

This week marked the start of the season for media features on illegal
aliens dying in the desert. The Washington Post’s entry on Tuesday was
especially horrific, telling of a blameless three-year-old boy who died of
dehydration and exposure as he accompanied his mother across the border.
Sixty Minutes, meanwhile, reran on Sunday a more policy-oriented offering,
but pegged it to the death of 18-year-old Abran Gonzales, "a quiet kid. He
never hurt anybody. He just wanted to work and come back home."

The message of these stories, and the cascade of other stories we will see
from the mainstream media over the next few months, is that such tragedies
are the result of increased border enforcement, which, in the Post
reporter’s words, `funneled them onto increasingly perilous trails where
temperatures are high, water is scarce and danger is abundant.’

It’s true, of course, that the concentration of enforcement resources near
the urban areas of San Diego and El Paso over the past decade or so shifted
the crossing patterns to more remote areas, especially to the Arizona
desert. And while it’s not clear that the total number of border deaths has
actually increased (since many people were killed in traffic accidents and
criminal assaults during the chaotic years when those two cities were the
focus of illegal crossings), the human toll is real, and heartrending.

But are tighter border controls really the cause? Is elite opinion right in
implying that we, as a nation, are responsible for the deaths of these
people by trying to control our borders? If so, then perhaps the supporters
of open borders are right and American sovereignty is itself a crime.

Fortunately not.

Many people share culpability for these deaths. The illegals themselves, of
course, are moral agents and responsible for their actions (including
endangering their children – how, unless you’re fleeing certain death, can
you justify risking the life of a three-year-old in a trackless wasteland?).
The smugglers, many of them scum of the earth, not infrequently abandon
their charges to the vultures. And the thieving elites of Mexico and the
other dysfunctional societies in Latin America also share the burden.

Interestingly, the standard culprit in polite opinion – the Border Patrol – is
not only blameless, but spends much of its time rescuing helpless illegals,
saving thousands of lives.

We, as Americans, do share responsibility, but not in the way that
fashionable thinking would have you believe. It’s not border enforcement, as
such, that’s at fault, but rather the toxic combination of tough (or at
least tougher) border enforcement with easy access to jobs.

The job magnet is strong because few businesses are ever punished for hiring
illegals, making the opportunities in America worth the risk of the
dangerous crossing. The amount of investigative time devoted to worksite
enforcement of immigration laws fell steadily from 1999 to 2003, dropping by
more than half, according to the GAO. The number of worksite arrests fell by
84 percent. And, from 1999 to 2004, the number of fines issued to employers
fell by 99 percent, plummeting to a laughable nationwide total of three.

Only in the past six months, after a quarter century of scorched-earth
resistance from open-borders advocates, have the two houses of Congress
separately voted to require businesses to verify the Social Security numbers
of new hires – and it still may not come to pass because of irreconcilable
differences in the bills.

And it’s not just jobs. The government at all levels has taken many actions
over the past few years to make life easier for illegal aliens – the Treasury
Department signaling to banks that Mexico’s illegal-alien ID card is an
acceptable credential for opening bank accounts; legislatures offering
in-state tuition subsidies to illegals attending state universities; and
city councils barring local police from using immigration law in the course
of their duties.

In other words, we’ve told prospective illegal aliens that they’ll have to
risk their lives to get in, but once they’re clear of the border, they’re
home free. With government establishing that kind of incentive structure,
it’s a wonder more people don’t die in the desert.

While no one is pleased by the deaths, Americans like the idea that
foreigners are willing to take such risks to get into our country. At a time
when the ties that bind us as a people are increasingly frayed and Muslim
fanatics plot to nuke us, we take some consolation in the fact that many
outsiders still want to come here to live. As Gov. George W. Bush (quoted in
Boy Genius) said of a remote and treacherous part of the Texas border,
"Hell, if they’ll walk across Big Bend, we want ’em."

But as a civilized people, we must face up to our responsibility for the
border deaths and stop sending mixed messages. We face two morally
consistent choices: on the one hand, we can continue to ignore worksite
enforcement, but open the borders. This would bring our interior and border
strategies in sync and stop forcing aliens to cross in remote and deadly
areas. It would also mean the dissolution of the American republic.

Or, we can get serious about upholding the law everywhere in our country,
combining strong border controls with muscular interior enforcement. This
means not only more arrests and deportations, but also a comprehensive
firewall strategy that would bar illegals from access to important
institutions of our society – no jobs, no bank accounts, no driver’s
licenses, no car loans, no mortgages.

By ending the mixed messages we send illegals, we can fundamentally change
the incentives they face, and the decisions they make. In this way, American
people can both protect the nation’s sovereignty and minimize these tragic
deaths at the same time.

Mark Krikorian is executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies
and an NRO contributor.
————————————- ———————————–
National Review Online –
ZTI1NTQ4NmNkMzZhNTc5ODgzYzAyOTU

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjE1MzFlMzc0

Pyunik" Will Play With the Champion of Moldova

"PYUNIK" WILL PLAY WITH THE CHAMPION OF MOLDOVA

A1+
[05:43 pm] 23 June, 2006

The casting of lots for the first qualifying phase of the 2006-2007
Champions League took place in the Swiss city of Nion. According tot
he selection champion of Armenia "Pyunik" will play with "Sheriff",
the champion of Moldova. The latter was the strongest of all the
possible opponents of "Pyunik".

The first match will take place in Yerevan on July 12.

The second one will take place a week later in Moldova.

The Armenian team has played with "Sheriff" only once and lost the
game 3:0. The winner of this pair will play with "Spartak", the vice
champion of Russia.

Nagorno-Karabakh Republic: Past, Present, Future

NAGORNO-KARABAKH REPUBLIC: PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE

Azat Artsakh, Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
25 June 2006

On June 21 the international conference entitled Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic: Past, Present and Future kicked off at Artsakh State
University. The conference will last till June 23 and is held under the
auspices of President Arkady Ghukassian. The council, which organized
and coordinated the conference, includes the minister of education,
culture and sport, the rectors of Yerevan State and Artsakh State
Universities, and over ten cultural and statesmen.

Besides NKR and Armenia, Russia, Germany, France, the United States,
Ukraine and other countries are participating in the conference
as well, namely over 100 participants including scholars who have
contributed greatly to Armenian studies. At the opening ceremony
Prime Minister Anoushavan Danielian and members of government, the
Archbishop of the Artsakh Diocese Parghev Martirosyan, Minister of
Education and Science of Armenia Levon Mkrtichyan, and others were
present. During the general meeting the German scholar Tessa Hoffman
made a report, drawing parallels between the conflicts of Nagorno
Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Ashot Melkonyan, the director
of the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of Armenia
drew historical parallels between Artsakh and Javakheti. From June
22 till June 24 the conference will continue in panels, namely the
history panel will be held at Artsakh State University, the culture
panel in Gandzasar, the politics, sociology, economy and philosophy
panels will be held in Martakert.

NORAYR HOVSEPYAN.

24-06-2006

Ljubljana ready to Create Conditions for Talks of Armenian and Azeri

Ljubljana ready to Create Conditions for Talks of Armenian and Azeri Leaders

PanARMENIAN.Net
24.06.2006 14:21 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The head and people of Slovenia "support the
position of Azerbaijan in the process of settlement of Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict, said Borut Megusar, Consul of Slovenia in Azerbaijan. Megusar
expressed his regret that during the chairmanship of Slovenia in OSCE
in 2005, it wasn’t achieved to obtain a positive result related to
the settlement of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. However, it doesn’t mean
that Slovenia has no concerns about the conflict, Megusar remarked.

"I always inform the head of Slovenia about the process happening
around this conflict. Official Ljubljana attentively follows the
process of solution of the conflict," Megusar emphasized. According
to him, Ljubljana is ready to create a situation for the continuation
of talks between the heads of conflict sides. Then, some decision
may be found on the question, told Megusar, Trend reports.

Ter-Petrosyan Will Come Forward When He Decides

TER-PETROSYAN WILL COME FORWARD WHEN HE DECIDES

Lragir.am
21 June 06

One of the topics of the debate between Samvel Nikoyan, Republican,
and Andranik Hovakimyan, All-Armenian Movement, was the upcoming
parliamentary election.

According to the deputy leader of the All-Armenian Movement, it is
pointless to speak about a political National Assembly unless the
situation changes, because everything will be decided beforehand.

"It is not important what costumes they will be wearing, liberal or
nationalist. Especially that these notions are distorted, and it is
not clear who a liberal is, for instance." As a result, according
to the representative of the All-Armenian Movement, the parliament
will again be appointed. The coalition does not have a role in this
matter. "There are centers, known to everybody, which predetermines
everything." Andranik Hovakimyan disagrees to the accusation that
the All-Armenian Movement is passive. According to him, the reason
is the wrong idea about political activities, for by saying activity
most people understand protest meetings.

"The society is devoid of the right to vote, and distrust towards
political parties is growing, their role diminishes," says the deputy
leader of the All-Armenian Movement, adding that even the political
parties in power are devoid of the possibilities of a political
party. "We know the degree of our possibilities," objects Samvel
Nikoyan. According to him, nothing strange happened.

"The home political sphere is a little calm, but there are also
internal processes, there is nothing unpredictable. The emergence
of new political parties and the divorce of the Orinats Yerkir Party
and the coalition are significant events." By the way, the Republican
suggests, "The home political processes and developments, suspension
of arrangements cannot be related to foreign political problems. Arthur
Baghdasaryan said what he had stated a year ago in Maydan."

Andranik Hovakimyan declined to publish the political platform of
the All-Armenian Movement. He only said that Ter-Petrosyan will come
forward when he decides.