Large special unit of Azerbaijan neutralized in Artsakh

Save

Share

 20:32,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 23, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian forces have neutralized a large Azerbaijani special unit in the southern direction, ARMENPRESS reports spokesperson of MoD Armenia Shsushan Stepanyan wrote on her Facebook page.

”As a result of a successful operation, the Armenian forces neutralized a large special unit of Azerbaijan in the southern direction, destroyed 9 military equipment and confiscated some other equipment. An Azerbaijani serviceman has been taken captive, who is now undergoing surgery by Armenian military doctors”, she wrote.

TURKISH press: Foreign policy emphasized in Erdoğan’s current agenda

Chairman of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan addresses his party’s group meeting at the Turkish Parliament, Ankara, Oct. 14, 2020. (AFP Photo)

The Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM) marks each legislative year with an inaugural speech by the president. The president outlines the nation’s legislative agenda and addresses major developments in domestic and international politics. This year President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan delivered his speech under the gloom of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Due to strict social distancing measures, ambassadors stationed in Turkey were missing from the aisles of the plenary session, along with many of the usual attendees. Though foreign dignitaries could not attend, Erdoğan devoted a large part of his speech to foreign policy. From the plenary hall Erdoğan reached out to foreign spectators and as the Turkish saying goes “inspired confidence in friends and fear in foes.”

Erdoğan’s emphasis on foreign policy comes as no surprise. While Turkey is never short of a lively domestic agenda, international and regional conflicts have increasingly been making headlines, with many of them happening in Turkey’s immediate vicinity. Most recently, Armenian aggression against Azerbaijan and Baku’s heroic efforts at reclaiming rightful territory has hit close to home. The Turkish nation feels strongly about Azerbaijan, and this sentiment was echoed in the president’s speech.

Erdoğan’s focus on international affairs also exemplifies how far Turkey’s foreign policy has come under his tenure as prime minister and now as president. Turkey boasts 235 diplomatic missions across the globe, ranking sixth globally in the number of representations. Turkey’s aid and educational agencies, the Yunus Emre Institute (YEE) and Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TIKA), are a testament to Turkey’s ever-expanding soft power reach.

Turkey has come a long way from towing the Western line in foreign affairs to establishing a truly independent and sovereign foreign policy approach. In all major regional conflicts, Turkey maintains an independent position justified by political necessity and moral adherence to fairness in the international system.

Failure of global system

On several occasions, Erdoğan remarked on how the international system built in the aftermath of World War II has become unsustainable. The U.N. system’s redundancy in the wake of major regional conflicts is a testament to this argument, exemplified in the president’s popular argument “the world is bigger than five” in reference to the makeup of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).

The international system has failed to deliver in Libya, Yemen, Syria and most recently in the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. In the lack of genuine multilateralism, competent actors that are party to such conflicts have sought solutions instead. Erdoğan recognized this failure in his speech in reference to the ineptitude of the Minsk Group set up by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s (OSCE) – comprising of France, Russia and the United States – in achieving a just solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Erdoğan criticized the Minsk Group’s call for an immediate cease-fire between Azerbaijan and Armenia, stating that the illegal Armenian annexation of the area has to end before such talks can proceed. The president’s speech seemed to echo Turkey’s own course of action in major regional conflicts – such as Syria and the Eastern Mediterranean – where Turkey has been the subject to calls by defunct international actors. Instead of appeasement, Turkey has rearranged the facts on the ground in a more just manner, and Azerbaijan is now attempting the same.

Regional issues

Four key regional topics dominated the president’s speech: the fight against terrorism in Syria and Iraq, the Eastern Mediterranean, the status of Jerusalem and the politics of the Gulf. The first two issues have dominated public discussion in Turkey for several months now, and it is unsurprising that the president took time to consider Turkey’s achievements in eliminating the threat of PKK terrorism in Syria and Iraq and success in retaining sovereign rights in the Eastern Mediterranean. More strikingly on Jerusalem and the Gulf, the president’s comments point to areas of interest for Turkey and possible new venues for the projection of Turkish foreign policy.

Regarding Jerusalem the president remarked on the Ottoman past of the city, citing how much of the city’s current architectural landscape is the product of the reign of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent. And thus, the president called Jerusalem “our city,” emphasizing its significance for Turkey from a point legitimized by history. Right-wing Zionist commentators in Israel and the United States were quick to criticize these comments as expansionist or hostile. Such analyses are void of history and are steeped in arrogance which sees only an Israeli reality for the city.

Erdoğan, in his championing of the Palestinian cause, expressed the need to continue upholding a plan for a two-state solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict, with Jerusalem as the rightful capital of the Palestinians. Calling Jerusalem “our city” is not some neo-Ottoman attempt at conquest as some spectators have suggested. Erdoğan greatly identifies with the plight of the Palestinian people, and as he has expressed on numerous platforms, Turkey will continue to voice the Palestinian position in the international arena.

With respect to the Gulf, the president’s speech touched on the passing of Emir Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jaber al-Sabah, the Kuwaiti Emir and an experienced statesman in the region. While reminiscing on the role the late emir had played in resolving regional disputes and remaining neutral in the rift in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Erdoğan took aim at countries in the Gulf that have been in open hostility against Turkey. Though the president did not name any countries, he was referring to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and to a lesser extent to Saudi Arabia, both of which have emerged as Turkey’s regional adversaries.

Abu Dhabi and Riyadh openly voice opposition to Turkey’s footprint in the region, and their rhetoric has become far more acute in recent months. Despite Saudi and Emirati opposition, the Gulf continues to dominate Turkey’s strategic thinking. Ankara’s relationship with Doha is being maintained at the highest echelons of the military, with joint Turkish-Qatari endeavors steering the conflict in Libya. Indeed, Turkey also boasts strong ties with Kuwait and Oman, two nations that have refused to join the Saudi lead embargo on Qatar. Turkey’s relationship with friendly countries in the Gulf, as well as attempts to balance UAE and Saudi Arabia, have become part of Ankara’s regional strategy.

One sure conclusion that can be made from Erdoğan’s address to the Parliament is that Turkey has a strong interest in the conflicts in its immediate vicinity. A testament to Turkey’s emerging role as a regional leader, Erdoğan remained steadfast in delivering Turkey’s foreign policy rationale for the future. Turkey’s proactive role in the region will undoubtedly continue to grow.

*Candidate for a masters of science in comparative politics at the London School of Economics

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
*MSc Comparative Politics Candidate at the London School of Economics

TURKISH press: Crimea only test field for Russia’s growing appetite in region, Ukraine’s Deputy FM Dzhaparova says

Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova speaks during a visit to the Crimean Tatar Association in Ankara, Turkey, Oct. 15, 2020. (Photo by Dilara Aslan)


The situation in Crimea is only a test field for the appetite of Russia in the region as it can be seen in both Syria and Libya, Ukraine’s Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova stated Thursday.

Speaking on Russia’s illegal annexation of the Crimea Peninsula from Ukraine in 2014 and Moscow’s backing of pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine’s Donbass region, Dzhaparova told Daily Sabah in an exclusive interview that Crimea should remain on the international community’s agenda until Ukraine’s territorial integrity is restored.

“We believe that Russia is a state that committed a crime against Ukraine, a country that is totally responsible for the occupation and a country that has to de-occupy Crimea,” Dzhaparova underlined.

“In order to increase the effectiveness of the international response to the ongoing occupation of Crimea and other related threats, Ukraine proposed establishing a new consultation and coordination format – the Crimean Platform,” the first deputy minister stated, elaborating that as a key event, a Crimea summit has been planned for the first half of 2021.

Accordingly, Ukraine’s goal was to consolidate under one chapeau all international activities aimed at countering Russia’s temporary occupation of Crimea – starting with sanctions and nonrecognition policy, demilitarization, transport and infrastructure issues to actions in humanitarian and environmental spheres. This platform would also contribute to tracking security issues in the Black Sea region as well as the wider Mediterranean region.

After being asked about reports that Russia was also invited to the summit, Dzhaparova stated that she believed this move would put pressure on Russia.

“For the moment, an official invitation was not sent to Russia. We plan to invite Russia, but we are not expecting that the invitation will be accepted,” she stated, stressing that Russia’s participation is not a prerequisite for the functioning of the platform.

“Of course, we do not have any illusion on what the real face of Russia today is and unfortunately we have to state that the current authority of Russia is one that does not demonstrate any civilized position and that actually commits crimes against humanity,” Dzhaparova said.

Russia annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine after an illegal independence referendum was held in 2014, following the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych as a result of the pro-European Union Euromaidan protests in the capital. The U.N. General Assembly (UNGA) later voted to proclaim the Russian action illegal. Along with an overwhelming majority of U.N. member states, Turkey denied recognition of Crimea as Russian territory.

As most ethnic Crimean Tatars opposed Moscow’s annexation of the peninsula, Russian authorities have cracked down on the community, abrogating their right to assembly and taking a Tatar-language television channel off the air, as well as detaining and jailing dozens of activists, a situation opposed by Turkey.

“This fake referendum that they conducted in March 2014 is nothing but a tricky attempt to justify their military occupation of the sovereign territory of Ukraine – Crimea,” Dzhaparova stressed.

Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova and Daily Sabah’s Dilara Aslan during an interview in Ankara, Turkey, Oct. 15, 2020. (Photo by Dilara Aslan)

Ukraine eyes further cooperation

As a staunch supporter of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, Turkey has frequently voiced that Russia has to end its illegal occupation of the peninsula.

“Both of our countries are living in a very challenging neighborhood and in this modern world we believe that it is a true luxury to have a true friendship and this is exactly what we enjoying with Turkey,” Dzhaparova stated, saying that though Ukraine is satisfied with the level of the strategic partnership with Turkey, there is still potential for further enhancing relations “for the benefit of the two countries as well as for the region.”

“We expect the continuation of political and practical support from Ankara,” she said. “We look forward to cooperating with Turkey in the framework of the Crimean Platform aimed at the de-occupation of Crimea. We would appreciate Turkey’s help to create better living conditions for Crimean Tatars who were forced to leave their homeland after the Russian occupation.”

Dzhaparova stated that she briefed Turkey’s Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu on the platform and that Ukraine expected Turkey to join this initiative. She also stressed that the declaration would fix nonrecognition and declared Turkey will never recognize the attempted annexation of Crimea.

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy will pay a working visit to Turkey on Friday during which he will come together with President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Istanbul to discuss all aspects of bilateral relations as well as steps aimed at further enhancing cooperation.

“We believe that we will sign a couple of documents that will further intensify our bilateral cooperation in different spheres in military, defense, security as well as in cultural, humanitarian dimensions but moreover what we expect is actually an issue that is related to Crimea,” Dzhaparova pointed out. A statement by the Ukrainian government on Wednesday stated that a military cooperation agreement would be signed which would reflect a guarantee for security and peace in the Black Sea region.

Defense relations between the two countries have developed rapidly, with military-technical cooperation between Ukraine and Turkey’s defense industries carrying various mutual benefits.

The two leaders held a high-level strategic council meeting previously in February in Kyiv and signed a joint declaration outlining concrete areas of cooperation.

“We have plenty of joint projects to implement. Starting from security and defense, high-tech, military-technical fields up to trade and economic, cultural and educational fields,” Dzhaparova highlighted, adding that more investment of Turkish companies in infrastructural projects is expected while negotiations on a free trade agreement are at the final stage.

The deputy minister further stated that Ukraine also expects much from the international community in tackling Russian aggression and human rights violations.

Saying that Kyiv appreciated the swift response of the international community’s vis-à-vis Russia’s attempt to annex Crimea and redraw the borders of modern Europe, Dzhaparova reminded that on March 27, 2014, the UNGA adopted a resolution calling on states and international organizations not to recognize any change of status of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol.

The EU imposed sanctions on Russia after it annexed the peninsula and refuses to recognize Moscow’s authority there. The bloc has separate sanctions targeting the Russian economy and other restrictive measures linked to the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol.

“We expect the international community to stick to decisions observing the nonrecognition policy,” she underlined.

Indicating that Russia attempted to enhance ties with the illegally occupied region, Dzhaparova said: “Russia is incorporating Crimea into its administrative structure, conducting militarization of Crimea and changing its demographic composition.”

“There is also a need to consolidate the common resilience of the Black Sea littoral states and our main partners in the EU and NATO in the face of Russia’s ever-growing belligerent behavior in the region that poses security threats and challenges to our common interests,” she added.

Humanitarian situation worsens

Touching upon the humanitarian situation, Dzhaparova stated that Russia forced the independent media out of the peninsula and shifted pressure to citizen journalists and human rights activists. Accordingly, monitoring bodies of international organizations are also unable to exercise their mandate in Crimea.

“The situation is bad and it is deteriorating daily,” the deputy minister said. “Unjustified searches, detentions and arrests under false charges, discrimination on religious and national grounds, intimidations of activists, journalists, advocates, etc. became a fact of life in today’s Crimea.”

“To consolidate the occupational regime, Russia pursues a covert demographic change in Crimea. 45,000 Ukrainian citizens have left Crimea over intimidation, persecution and fear. Estimates of how many people were brought to Crimea from Russia vary from 150 to 500 thousand people,” she highlighted.

She further pointed out that since 2014, Russia conducted 11 conscription campaigns illegally drafting about 25,000 Crimean residents into the Russian military. “The 12th campaign is ongoing,” Dzhaparova stated, explaining that Moscow’s influence and presence in the peninsula are not voiced when Russia states its official position.

Kyiv supports Baku’s sovereignty

“Ukraine, like Turkey, consistently supports the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Azerbaijan within its internationally recognized borders – the same way Azerbaijan supports Ukraine’s territorial integrity. It is our principal position based on international law,” Dzhaparova said as fighting has been continuing for weeks between Baku and Yerevan over the Armenian-occupied territories.

Saying that war and casualties including civilian deaths are a tragedy, Dzhaparova stated that the situation is “just more proof that both protracted and hot conflicts remain a major factor of instability threatening security in Europe, which may lead at any moment to the resumption of armed hostilities and heavy human losses.”

She called on both sides to cease military action and resolve the conflict in accordance with international law.

“However, mediation by Russia, which itself continues aggression against Ukraine and occupation of Ukraine’s sovereign territories, does not add optimism to that turbulent situation,” she continued.

Border clashes broke out on Sept. 27 when Armenian forces targeted Azerbaijani civilian settlements and military positions, leading to casualties.

Relations between the two countries have been tense since 1991 when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, an internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan. Referencing this fact, four U.N. Security Council (UNSC) and two UNGA resolutions, as well as decisions by many international organizations, demand that Armenia’s occupying forces withdraw from Nagorno-Karabakh and seven other occupied regions of Azerbaijan. Yet, efforts including that of the Minsk Group, set up in 1992 by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) to find a peaceful solution to the conflict, have seen no results.

“The war will end and we will still have to live together here”

EurasiaNet.org
Oct 19 2020
Giorgi Lomsadze Oct 19, 2020

These are tense days for Georgia’s Armenians and Azerbaijanis.

The two groups make up the largest minorities in the country and both have been riveted by the new war between Armenian and Azerbaijan, now entering its fourth week. But both communities say that the war to the south, no matter how bloody, should not spoil their longstanding peaceful relations in Georgia.

Scissors stopped snipping at a barber shop in Tbilisi’s old city, for centuries host to a rich mix of groups including Georgians, Armenians, and Azerbaijanis, when the conversation turned to the war.

“Butchers, that’s who they are,” snapped the barber, Armen, a Tbilisi Armenian, referring to the Azerbaijanis his co-ethnics are fighting for control of the territory in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, about 250 miles from the Georgian capital.

Armen railed against the Syrian mercenaries that Turkey is accused of sending to fight on the side of its ally, Azerbaijan. He pulled up the Facebook page of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who had posted videos of a battlefield strewn with bodies and the alleged Syrians calling Armenians “Christian pigs.”

“Come on now, Armen,” his Georgian colleague pleaded. She gestured with her eyes at the shop’s clients, who were indeed raptly watching his tirade.

“See, my people are dying every day but nobody cares, here or anywhere,” Armen snapped back. “Putin doesn’t care, Trump doesn’t care, she is my friend, but even she doesn’t care.”

But then the topic of conversation shifted to Azerbaijanis closer to home.

“Ah, you mean the Azerbaijanis here in Georgia?” Armen said in a quieter tone. He took a few moments to respond. “They are actually very good people,” he said, a bit incredulous at his own observation. “Don’t quote me on this, but I’d say they are much nicer than some Armenians here,” he added after some thought and with a tight smile.

Armen eventually asked that his last name or the name of the parlor not be used in the story – “everyone is acting crazy these days and I don’t want trouble” – but he was willing to continue on the topic of the Georgian Azerbaijanis.

“They live quietly in Marneuli, work hard,” he said, referring to the region in southwestern Georgia with the largest concentration of ethnic Azerbaijanis. “She and I went to see a fortune-teller there once,” he added, pointing at the Georgian hairdresser, who nodded affirmatively. “We bought some vegetables at the market. I’m clearly an Armenian,” he added, pointing at his face, “but nobody cared.”

Azerbaijanis in Georgia are similarly passionate about the war, keeping count of the growing death toll and watching in shock as videos circulate of brutalities committed against their ethnic kin. But, like Armen, Georgian Azerbaijanis who spoke with Eurasianet also were careful not to direct their anger at the Armenians that they share a country with.

“It makes little sense for us to argue about the war,” said Tofig Bairamov, a handyman from a majority-Azerbaijani village of Mskhaldidi, who partners up with an Armenian from a nearby village to run a small home-repair business. The pair doesn’t see eye-to-eye on the matter of Nagorno-Karabakh, but Bairamov says it doesn’t get in the way of their working relationship.

“He will never admit it, but Armenia is in the wrong on Karabakh and to end this war [the territory] has to go back to Azerbaijan, period,” Bairamov said. “But governments start and end wars, so why should we argue about it?”

Glimmer of hope

Even as the violence and passions have flared to their south and east, Armenians and Azerbaijanis in Georgia have not turned on one another. When fighting broke out between the two sides in July, it sparked physical confrontations between Armenians and Azerbaijanis around the world, from Moscow to Los Angeles. But Georgia – home to 233,000 ethnic Azerbaijanis and 168,000 ethnic Armenians – remained calm. So far, that’s still the case.

“It is disappointing, heartbreaking to see some Georgian-Armenians, people you know and even worked with, openly take sides and share anti-Azerbaijani posts on social media,” said Kamran Mammadli, a Georgian-Azerbaijani minority rights activist. “But at least there have been no instances of direct confrontations, not to my knowledge.”

Yana Israelyan, a Tbilisi-based journalist of Armenian descent, said she had not seen much tension on social networks between Georgian Armenians and Azerbaijanis. “When you read Georgian-Azerbaijanis’ posts about this, you just opt not to engage, because you know that everyone will stick to their guns anyway,” she said.

“Armenians understand that local Azerbaijanis support Baku in the Karabakh conflict and, on the other hand, everyone knows where the loyalties of the local Armenians lie,” she went on. “But everyone also understands that the war will end and we will still have to live together here.”

Even if the relationship is not always chummy, the peaceful coexistence of Armenians and Azerbaijanis in Georgia offers a glimmer of hope for a region riven with ethnic conflict and boasting one of the world’s largest concentrations of territorial disputes per square mile.

Since the first war between Armenians and Azerbaijanis in the 1990s, Georgia has been the easiest place for people from Armenia and Azerbaijani to meet. Academics and civil society activists regularly convene in Tbilisi, and Armenians and Azerbaijanis every year make up the largest groups of foreign visitors to Georgia. Tourists stay at the same resorts and take the same road onward to Russia.

Georgia has long served as proof that trade interests and human contact can trump mutual grudges and the notion of “ancient hatred” cultivated by state propagandists in Armenia and Azerbaijan. The two peoples that former Armenian President Robert Kocharyan once notoriously described as “ethnically incompatible” mixed and mingled in Tbilisi for centuries. They live together in a handful of Georgian villages and also as separate communities in two regions, Azerbaijanis in Marneuli and Armenians in Samtskhe-Javakheti.  

Which is not to say that the environment in Georgia has not been fraught. Following the outbreak of the war, Georgia’s minorities have been actively rooting for their respective sides in the conflict. They have been sending aid to the frontlines and some even have volunteered to fight. Solidarity rallies have been held in Marneuli and Samtskhe-Javakheti.

“For every Armenian in Georgia, the morning begins with checking the news from Karabakh,” Israelyan said. “But Armenians living in Tbilisi and Armenians in Samtskhe-Javakheti see the conflict a bit differently. Maybe this is because Armenians in Samtskhe-Javakheti live together as a community, while in Tbilisi it is more mixed and there are closer contacts with people of other ethnic groups.”  

Neglect from Tbilisi

Part of the reason rural minorities tend to be more involved, emotionally or otherwise, in the neighboring countries’ war is that successive Georgian governments have consistently failed to meaningfully integrate non-Georgians into the country’s fabric, Mammadli, the rights activist, argued.

“The center does not care much for minority regions,” he said. “There is a lot of poverty and estrangement in these regions. They feel neglected by the rest of Georgia and therefore feel affinity with the neighboring countries.”    

As minorities, Armenians and Azerbaijanis actually have more that unites them than divides them, Mammadli argued. “We both face stereotypes here and are often treated as second-rate citizens, as we don’t fit into the notion of a Georgian as it is defined by the mainstream,” he said. “So we have a common cause to assert ourselves as Georgian citizens, gain better access to education, jobs, healthcare, political life, to be seen as Georgians even if we are not Georgians by blood.”   

While the Armenian-Azerbaijani modus vivendi in Georgia can potentially serve as a moderating influence, there are many pitfalls, as well. No country in the South Caucasus is happy with the shape and size of the territory that history has assigned to them, and Georgia also has plenty of issues with its two neighbors.

Aside from losing control of the Russian-backed breakaway territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Georgia also has locked horns with Azerbaijan over an ancient monastery complex that straddles a still-undefined stretch of the two countries’ border. Georgians also harbor fears of potential Armenian irredentism in Samtskhe-Javakheti.    

Careful neutrality

On the government level, Tbilisi, Yerevan and Baku maintain restraint on these fronts. Ordinary Georgians, however, can be prone to knee-jerk reactions to disputes on the monastery complex with Azerbaijan or to the faintest hint of Armenian separatism in Samtskhe-Javakheti.  

When Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan recently posted a photo of a rally in Samtskhe-Javakheti in support of Armenia, it prompted a minor furor in Georgian social networks. The photo was captioned “Javakh,” the Armenian term for the region, which to many Georgians sounded like a territorial claim.

Armenians joined the fray online to argue that the picture was merely intended to be one example of the solidarity being expressed by Armenian diasporas around the world, but it still resulted in some unsavory exchanges between Georgians and Armenians. Pashinyan’s Facebook account later changed the photo caption to “Javakheti.”

Some Armenians, for their part, have been aggrieved by Georgia’s hesitation to let aid shipments that local Armenians had gathered cross the border into Armenia. A few posted profanity-laced videos online and called for boycotting Georgia’s summer resorts, leading to more high-pitched exchanges with Georgians.

At the same time, Georgian prosecutors began a poorly timed criminal probe into years-old border negotiations with Azerbaijan.

Two Georgian cartographers have been arrested on charges of treason, accused of deliberately allowing part of the disputed monastery territory slip into Azerbaijan’s control under the previous ruling regime. The case, launched just weeks before parliamentary elections, seems suspiciously timed to discredit the former ruling party – now the main opposition – ahead of that vote. But it also seems a tone-deaf diplomatic move at a time of heightened regional tension.

Georgia maintains a careful neutrality in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, and both sides keenly watch for any deviation. A faux pas could open up sources of tension in a region where complicated history has left every group feeling that every other group has wronged them somewhere along the line.

Back at the salon, one inauspicious comment by the Georgian hairdresser triggered an outpouring of mutual grievances.

“For the life of me, I don’t get why you are killing each other over Karabakh,” the hairdresser told her Armenian colleague, Armen. “I looked up photos and there is nothing there. It is nothing like Abkhazia.”

Armen erupted. “So because you had a home in Abkhazia, had your palm trees and tangerines there, you support Azerbaijan and don’t care that my brothers and sisters are dying,” he said.  

The Georgian took offense. “I don’t support anyone,” she said. “And yes, I’m from Abkhazia and I know what it is like to be kicked out from your home. So yes, I understand when people want to go back to their homes.”

Soon the two were working their way through a lengthy list of old talking points: Georgians’ annoyance with Armenians’ preoccupation with the once extensive kingdom of Great Armenia, Georgian fears of cultural expropriation by Armenia, and the centuries-old Armenian churches in Tbilisi that Georgia would prefer to see reduced to ruin rather than be handed over to the Armenian Church.

When Armen finished the haircut, he offered an olive branch, of sorts.

“When you meet Azerbaijanis, tell them they are free to come and get a haircut here,” he said. “So long as they don’t mention Karabakh and the war.”

 

Giorgi Lomsadze is a journalist based in Tbilisi, and author of Tamada Tales.


https://eurasianet.org/the-war-will-end-and-we-will-still-have-to-live-together-here?fbclid=IwAR1-9EUM2vkOjDrF0sc4d68plKSvxxJ0u1BhChLe0RBdQsU_lUXQx3MR5Tk

Press Release: LA DCCC Unanimously Passes Emergency Resolution Condemning Turkey and Azerbaijan for War Crimes and Calling for U.S. Sanctions

For Immediate Release |

Media Contact

Anahit Sargsyan

916.768.0725 | [email protected] 


Elen Asatryan  

818.523.8389 | [email protected]

Photo available here

                                                                                                                                                                                                    
LA Democratic Party County Central Committee Unanimously Passes Emergency Resolution Condemning Turkey and Azerbaijan for War Crimes and Calling for U.S. Sanctions

Los Angeles, CA – On Tuesday, October 13, the Los Angeles Democratic Party County Central Committee, by a 139-0 vote, unanimously passed an emergency resolution (Res 003-2024) condemning Azerbaijan and Turkey of committing war crimes with their attacks on the Republic of Artsakh and Armenia and calling on the U.S. to immediately impose sanctions and halt military aid to Azerbaijan and Turkey. 

Authored and introduced by County Central Committee member Elen Asatryan, the resolution came to a floor vote with a broad group of cosponsors, including: Congressman Adam Schiff, California State Senator Anthony Portantino, California State Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, California State Assembly Majority Leader Ian Calderon, Assemblymembers Adrin Nazarian and Richard Bloom, LACDP Chair Mark Gonzales, LACDP members Suzie Abajian, Mark Ramos, Jennifer Chang and forty-six others.

“I am proud to have led the effort to bring this resolution to the floor today and I am grateful for the unanimous support it has received. As war crimes are being committed and the right of Armenians to exist peacefully in their ancestral homeland is threatened, we are on the brink of a second genocide against the Armenian people and our tax dollars are being used to commit these war crimes. If we don’t take a strong stance now to sanction Turkey and Azerbaijan, then nothing sets us apart from the international community in 1915 who stood by and watched the Armenian Genocide unfold- and did nothing to stop it,”said Asatryan.  

“It is our collective responsibility to demand and achieve concrete action to stop Azeri and Turkish war crimes and support the people of Artsakh in their right to self-determination,” she added.

During the meeting, LACDP Chair Mark Gonzales stated, “We stand in support of our brothers and sisters in Armenia and Artsakh.” LACDP Member Daniel Tamm echoed: “This is a body that must stand against oppression and aggression; we are looking at pure aggression against Artsakh and Armenia here, and I ask the body to unanimously adopt this resolution.” 

“Tonight’s LACDP resolution was very meaningful for me as an Armenian American who, for decades, has fought for justice alongside many other communities here in Greater Los Angeles. I greatly appreciate this powerful act of solidarity, affirming our people’s right to live in peace in their ancestral lands,” stated LACDP member Suzie Abajian.

The resolution did not receive any opposition from the floor and proceeded to a vote.

The Los Angeles County Democratic Party resolution language is perhaps one of the strongest heard across the political spectrum in the U.S. The resolution acknowledges Turkey’s direct involvement in aiding Azerbaijan and the deployment of terrorist jihadist groups by Turkey to assist Azerbaijan in targeting settlements, killing and injuring civilians in Artsakh, thereby violating international humanitarian law.  

Specifically, the resolution condemns Turkey and Azerbaijan for the commission of war crimes in their attacks on Artsakh and Armenia and urges for the immediate cessation of hostilities without preconditions. The resolution calls on President Erdogan to cease providing military assistance to Azerbaijan and asks Congress and President Trump to stop providing military assistance to Turkey and Azerbaijan and to sanction both countries. 

The resolution will be delivered to the President of the United States, the Secretary of State, the Speaker and Minority Leader of the United States House of Representative, as well as the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the United States Senate. 

As part of the party process, the resolution will be sent to the California Democratic Party and the Democratic National Committee to pass a resolution in the same regard. 

The language of the resolution as presented and Asatryan’s statement of appeal is available here.

The County Central Committee is the official governing body of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party, which develops party policies and positions, evaluates and decides on which candidates and issues to endorse in local and municipal elections, and provides a grassroots forum for the study and discussion of public policy issues and their impact.  It is also the largest local Democratic Party entity in the United States, representing nearly 2.9 million Democrats in the 88 cities and the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County – a population larger than 42 individual states. Most importantly, the County Central Committee works to educate the public and encourage the fullest possible participation of all Democratic voters.

###


Artsakh’s army excellently carries out its military tasks – President’s spokesperson

Save

Share

 19:56,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 11, ARMENPRESS. The Defense Army of Artsakh excellently carries out its military tasks, ARMENPRESS reports spokesperson of Artsakh’s President Vahram Poghosyan wrote on his Facebook page, referring to the Azerbaijani offense attempts in the southern direction of the contact line.

‘’South is again turbulent, but the Defense Army carries out its tasks excellently’’, Poghosyan wrote.

On October 9 a ceasefire agreement was reached between the Armenian and Azerbaijani FMs mediated by Russian FM. Aetsakh has voiced about numerous cases of the ceasefire violation by Azerbaijan since the agreement entered into force, including launching missile strikes against cities and settlements of Artsakh.

Azerbaijani armed forces also launched attempts of offensive in the evening of October 11 in the north-eastern and southern directions.

Editing and translating by Tigran Sirekanyan

‘Turkey has a clear objective of reinstating the Turkish empire’, Armenian PM says

France 24
Oct 3 2020
 
 
 
‘Turkey has a clear objective of reinstating the Turkish empire’,
Armenian PM says
 
 Heavy fighting escalated this week between Armenian and Azerbaijan forces over the disputed separatist region of Nagorno-Karabakh. On Friday, global leaders renewed calls for a ceasefire with French President Emmanuel Macron pressing for a fresh round of peace talks. In an interview with FRANCE 24’s Gulliver Cragg in Yerevan, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan sat down to discuss the crisis embroiling his country.
 
 
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan told FRANCE 24 that Turkey would continue its expansionist footprint and its goal of  “the genocide of Armenians”.
 
“Armenia is the last obstacle in the way of Turkey and their expansion towards the north, and the east,” Mr Pashinyan said.
 
He pointed to recent evidence of Turkish aggression in the Mediterranean Sea towards Greece and involvement in Syria and Iraq.
 
“Turkey has a clear objective of reinstating the Turkish Empire. Don’t be surprised if that policy succeeds here, don’t be surprised if they attempt to incorporate into their empire not only the Greek islands but expand further into continental Europe. If Turkey succeeds in this, wait for them in Vienna.”
 
>> Is Turkey a brother in arms or just extending its footprint into Nagorno-Karabakh?
 
The fighting in and around Nagorno-Karabakh is the biggest escalation in years in the decades-long dispute over the region, which lies within Azerbaijan but is controlled by local ethnic Armenian forces backed by Armenia.
 
Please visit the webpage to view the  full interview.
 
 
 
 
 

The Geopolitics Of Armenia And Azerbaijan

Greek City Times
Oct 3 2020
by Guest Blogger

The news over the past three days was particularly marked by the military conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. In a nutshell, it’s about land.

Strictly speaking, around the areas between Armenia and Azerbaijan which are marked here in red and green-brown.

This dispute arose from the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Nagorno-Karabakh War (1988-1994). Armenia emerged victorious from this war.

As a result, these areas became de facto independent and the Artsakh Republic was born.

However, the UN continues to regard these areas as the national territory of Azerbaijan. The majority of the population there are Armenians.

From here on, my personal opinion on the events of the last few days follows.

Logically speaking, Armenia has no interest in changing the status quo. With Azerbaijan it looks different. Reports increased last week that Turkey had sent terrorists from Syria to Azerbaijan to fight against Armenia. Look at the reports by Lindsey Snell.

Turkey has also assured its partner Azerbaijan 100% support. Turkish drones are said to be deployed against the Armenian army. It was reported that a Turkish jet shot down an Armenian jet yesterday morning.

All of these factors lead me to believe that Azerbaijan planned the whole thing over a longer period of time and was also the party that started this war. Turkey and Azerbaijan seem to think that they are stronger today than they were in the 1990s and that this reality should be reflected in geography as well.

I am only saying that one war was already enough and that a solution can only be achieved through realistic discussion. It is absolutely unacceptable that Turkey – a NATO country – continues its adventurism in the region and makes conflicts.

We have already seen in the past that Turkey transported terrorists from Syria to Libya. This is a serious threat to the stability of the local countries and therefore also to Europe.

The EU and especially Germany should have spoken out in favor of clear sanctions against Turkey in the case of Libya and Syria. Appeasement only leads to further aggression.

It is definitely time to rethink our relationship with Turkey. I would also like to note here that this foreign policy is not only something that emanates from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan but also from the majority of the Turkish political spectrum.

And before one carelessly comments, let me show you that war is hell. Check out the young man at the end of the video who is losing his sanity.

Look at the dates of birth of the fallen. Partly born between 2000 and 2002. These could be your sons, brothers, and cousins.

At this point I would like to express my condolences to all relatives. Rest in peace. I have nothing more to say about this.


https://greekcitytimes.com/2020/09/30/the-geopolitics-of-armenia-and-azerbaijan/

Security Alert – U.S. Embassy Yerevan, Armenia

US Embassy in Armenia
Oct 2 2020

Home Home | News & Events |

Location: Armenia

Event: Military confrontations continue in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. The U.S. Embassy urges U.S. citizens currently in a safe location to avoid non-essential in-country travel. The U.S. Embassy has instructed Embassy employees and their family members not to travel outside of Yerevan Province.
In accordance with previous security alerts, the U.S. Embassy in Armenia also continues to urge U.S. citizens to avoid travel south of Yerevan, east of Lake Sevan, and east of the M4 and M16 Highways north of the Dilijan National Park and up to the border with Georgia in Tavush province. Do not travel to the Nagorno-Karabakh region.

The U.S. Embassy encourages U.S. citizens to monitor local news reporting. The U.S. Embassy will continue to monitor the security situation and provide additional information as needed.

Actions to Take:

  • Monitor local media for updates.
  • Avoid crowds.
  • Avoid demonstrations.
  • Notify friends and family of your safety.
  • Be aware of your surroundings.
  • Review your personal security plans.
  • Avoid non-essential in country travel.

Assistance:

U.S. Embassy Yerevan
(+374-10) 49-45-85 (business hours)

(+374-10) 464-700 (after hours)
1 American Avenue
Yerevan 0082, Republic of Armenia
https://am.usembassy.gov/

For Travel Alerts and information about Armenia: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/International-Travel-Country-Information-Pages/Armenia.html

State Department – Consular Affairs
888-407-4747 or 202-501-4444

Enroll in Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) to receive security updates
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

https://am.usembassy.gov/security-alert-u-s-embassy-yerevan-armenia-10022020/

Armenia uses image of gun-wielding priest as Azerbaijan declares state of war

Middle East Monitor
Sept 28 2020