Verelq: We are not against increasing the bail of 4 billion drams by another 400 million drams – house arrest

In the anti-corruption court, under the chairmanship of judge Vahe Dolmazyan, the discussion of Samvel Karapetyan’s restraining order continues. Aram Vardevanyan, one of the defenders, presented the petition, noting that Samvel Karapetyan was detained for 10 months, 5 of which were exclusively for the charge of “calling” that he said “we will participate in the defense of the church in our own way”.


As for the other episodes of the accusation, according to the defense attorney, there is no reasonable suspicion regarding one of the episodes regarding the economic crime.


Referring to the fact that being free, Samvel Karapetyan can hinder the investigation, Vardevanyan said. “For what should he interfere, interfere?” With an obviously political, illegal, rights-degrading proceeding, why should he interfere with the course of the proceedings, what anyone said or the record? He did not behave inappropriately during this time, nothing will change in his behavior, only the perception of others has changed towards him.”


The defender noticed that Samvel Karapetyan was given the largest bail in the history of Armenia, 4 billion drams, and they are not opposed to increasing the amount of bail by 400 million drams with the abolition of house arrest.


Vardevanyan petitioned to abolish house arrest as a preventive measure.

Asbarez: Bipartisan Congressional Gathering Demands Justice for Century of Gen

Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) addresses a packed room of Armenian Americans and allies at the April 15th Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, co-hosted by the ANCA and the Armenian Assembly, in cooperation with the Congressional Armenian Caucus


Lawmakers Issue Unified Call for Release of Armenian Hostages, Artsakh Right of Return, and Sanctions Against Aliyev and Erdogan

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan gathering of Congressional leaders joined Armenian Americans and allies from across the country on April 15 for the annual Capitol Hill commemoration of the Armenian Genocide, issuing unified calls for the immediate release of Armenian hostages, the right of return for Artsakh Armenians, and sanctions against the Aliyev and Erdogan regimes for genocidal crimes spanning from 1915 to 2023, reported the Armenian National Committee of America.

The solemn commemoration, co-hosted by the ANCA and the Armenian Assembly of America, in cooperation with the Congressional Armenian Caucus, is the latest in a decades-long tradition of annual Capitol Hill observances dating back to the first such gathering in 1965, which marked the 50th anniversary of the Genocide. This year’s program came as Turkey and Azerbaijan’s genocidal crimes against the Armenian nation — from 1915 to 2023 — remain unaddressed and ongoing. Armenian prisoners of war and civilian captives, including Artsakh leaders, continue to languish in Azerbaijani detention. More than 150,000 Artsakh Armenians remain forcibly displaced from their homes. And Azerbaijan continues to occupy sovereign Armenian territory while pressing demands designed to foreclose any prospect of justice, accountability, or return.

“The Armenian Genocide – from 1915 until today – was, from the start – and remains still: A crime, not a conflict,” stated ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “Our current challenges: Existential (genocidal), not transactional. Our focus: Firmly on the threat horizon – fundamentally on our future, not our past.”

Hamparian rejected what he called the false peace now being imposed upon Armenia — one that “locks in the fruits of Azerbaijan’s genocidal gains, locks down Armenia’s losses – of soil, security, and sovereignty, and forever locks out Artsakh refugees from their homes – blocking their right to return to – and live freely upon – their indigenous homeland.”

ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, warning against a false peace that “normalizes Azerbaijan’s genocide of Artsakh.”

“A false peace – absent accountability – that (in a word) normalizes Azerbaijan’s genocide of Artsakh,” Hamparian warned. “Worse still, that rewards this crime. That aids, abets, and emboldens its perpetrators. That punishes its victims. And sets the stage for future attacks — aggression aimed at finishing the genocidal work started more than a century ago by Abdul Hamid, Talaat Pasha, and Kemal Ataturk. This we cannot abide. This we will stand against with all our strength.”

Keynote speaker Karnig Kerkonian, Esq. addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, warning that “we are standing inside the ongoing genocidal process against the Armenian people.”

Dr. Robert Krikorian, the evening’s emcee and a former senior U.S. Department of State official with more than two decades of firsthand Armenia policy experience, drew a direct line from Turkey’s unrepentant Genocide denial to Azerbaijan’s assault on Artsakh. “An unrepentant Turkey orchestrated and led the Azerbaijani assault on Artsakh in 2020,” Krikorian said. “And Azerbaijan has been faithful to this idea by committing genocide against the Armenian people of Artsakh in 2023 in full view of an indifferent world.” He closed on a note of determined resolve: “Yes, Armenia stands alone in the world… except for us, the descendants of survivors of the Armenian Genocide. We will continue to support Armenian statehood, to support the democratic aspirations of the people of Artsakh to live freely on their land, and to pursue the just cause of Armenian Genocide Recognition. We will not forget.”

Emcee Dr. Robert Krikorian, a former senior U.S. Department of State official with more than two decades of Armenia policy experience, addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration

Kerkonian: Perpetrators Must Be Confronted, Not Appeased
Keynote speaker Karnig Kerkonian, Esq. delivered a sweeping address anchoring the proceedings in the lived reality of genocide as a continuous and unfinished process. Beginning with the story of his 12-year-old grandfather sewing leather water pouches in Aintab as Armenian deportees streamed past in 1915 — “It never occurred to us that we would be next,” his grandfather would reflect a lifetime later — Kerkonian built to a prosecutorial indictment of the present moment, tracing a direct line from the Hamidian massacres of the 1880s through the Artsakh genocide in 2023.

Members of Congress bow their heads during the opening invocation at the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration. Pictured, from left: Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL), Maryland State Delegate Dr. Lorig Charkoudian, Rep. Mike Levin (D-CA), Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA), and Rev. Father Sarkis Aktavoukian of Soorp Khatch Armenian Church

“We are not here simply commemorating the past,” Kerkonian said. “We’re here commemorating 1915 as we’re standing inside the ongoing genocidal process against the Armenian people.”

Kerkonian warned specifically against the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP), arguing it functions not as an economic opportunity but as a mechanism to circumvent Armenian sovereignty — “the end run,” he called it, “the act of appeasement” that allows Azerbaijan to avoid acknowledging Armenia’s de facto statehood. He placed the right of return for Artsakh Armenians at the center of the strategic struggle: “Advocating for the right of return of the Artsakh Armenians is not merely a mechanism to secure a fundamental human right. It is an essential mechanism to obstruct the ongoing relentless march made possible by every previous act of appeasement.”

Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV) poses with Homenetmen Armenian General Athletic Union scouts at the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration

He closed with an unsparing call to historical responsibility: “Even if you do not see the return of the Artsakh Armenians in your lifetime, you are still responsible for it. Even if justice is deferred, you are not excused. Even if the world pretends not to see, you are still called to bear witness.”

Pelosi: Honor Their Memory Not Only by Remembrance, But Resolve
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) reflected on decades of Armenian-American advocacy that made the passage of the historic 2019 Armenian Genocide Resolution possible, crediting the community’s outside mobilization as the decisive force behind its passage. Recalling her very first day in Congress — when Turkish government placed a thick volume on her desk about the history of the Ottoman Empire in an early attempt to advance their denial narrative — Pelosi described a community that has spent decades fighting back against that well-funded campaign, overcoming presidential phone calls to committee members urging a no vote and years of institutional resistance to bring the truth to the House floor. “There’s nothing more eloquent to a member of Congress than the voice of his or her constituent,” she said. “Your voices were heard by members of Congress, and that’s why we were able to pass the Armenian Genocide Resolution.” She closed with a charge to the room: “May we honor the memory of those victims, not only by remembrance, but resolve.”

Armenian Caucus Co-Chair Rep. David Valadao (R-CA) poses with Homenetmen Armenian General Athletic Union scouts at the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration

Congressional Leaders Demand Action
Among the legislators offering remarks were Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), and Rep. David Valadao (R-CA), Vice-Chair Brad Sherman (D-CA), and Representatives Gabe Amo (D-RI), Sanford Bishop (D-GA), Judy Chu (D-CA), Jim Costa (D-CA), Vince Fong (R-CA), Laura Friedman (D-CA), George Latimer (D-NY), Mike Lawler (R-NY), Mike Levin (D-CA), Seth Magaziner (D-RI), Jim McGovern (D-MA), Dave Min (D-CA), Delia Catalina Ramirez (D-IL), Luz Rivas (D-CA), Haley Stevens (D-MI), and Dina Titus (D-NV).

Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chair Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, pledging that the Caucus’s goals “will continue regardless of which government is in charge in Armenia or in the United States.”

Hostage Release and Prisoner Accountability
The demand for Azerbaijan’s immediate release of Armenian hostages ran through the evening’s congressional remarks like a thread, with members from both parties making clear that no peace process can be considered credible while Armenian prisoners of war and civilian captives — including Artsakh’s elected leaders — remain in Azerbaijani detention.

Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), who was among key leaders of the Armenian Genocide Resolution in the House to its historic 2019 passage, opened on a note of alarm, calling out the current administration’s retreat from that hard-won recognition and demanding accountability beyond the peace agreement signed at the White House last summer — an agreement, he noted, that “does not even mention the prisoners of war that Azerbaijan continues to hold.” With regard to the Armenian Genocide recognition, “Some in the current administration are sadly retreating from that important progress, and we must push back against that retreat,” Schiff said.

Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, calling on all present to honor the memory of Genocide victims “not only by remembrance, but resolve.”

Where Schiff sounded the alarm on diplomatic backsliding, Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) drove home the moral stakes with blunt precision: “Peace without accountability is not peace. It is permission.” Lawler called for the immediate release of Armenian prisoners and full enforcement of Section 907, warning that failure to act risks “repeating the very failures that made past atrocities possible.”

Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) brought firsthand witness to the chamber’s proceedings. Having visited Artsakh in person over direct Azerbaijani threats — and subsequently banned from entering Azerbaijan, a distinction she called “a badge of honor” — Chu was unequivocal: “I will never give up demanding that the political prisoners of Armenia be returned from Azerbaijan.”

Homenetmen Armenian General Athletic Union scouts gather with Rev. Father Sarkis Aktavoukian of Soorp Khatch Armenian Church at the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration. Also pictured, at far left, is keynote speaker Karnig Kerkonian, Esq. and, at far right, ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian

Rep. Vince Fong (R-CA) grounded the hostage issue in its broader strategic context, calling the unlawful detention of Artsakh’s leaders not merely a human rights violation but “a barrier to lasting peace” — and reaffirming his co-sponsorship of the Armenia Security Partnership Act (H.R.6840) as the legislative vehicle for accountability.

Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI), made the connection between prisoner release and U.S. military assistance explicit: “U.S. military assistance should not, cannot flow to Azerbaijan while they continue to hold Armenian prisoners, occupy Armenian territory, and deny the right of return.”

Armenian Caucus Co-Chair Rep. David Valadao (R-CA), left, and Rep. Vince Fong (R-CA), right, with ANCA Government Affairs Director Tereza Yerimyan at the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration

Artsakh Right of Return
If the hostage demand was the evening’s most urgent call, the right of return for Artsakh’s more than 150,000 displaced Armenians was its moral center — with members pressing for international guarantees that go beyond any peace agreement currently on the table.

Rep. Seth Magaziner (D-RI) set the frame, reaffirming his co-sponsorship of the Armenia Security Partnership Act (H.R.6840) and placing the right of return at the heart of the Caucus’s legislative agenda: “We have to continue to remain vigilant and do everything we can to ensure that Armenian sovereignty and freedom is respected.”

Congressional Armenian Staff Association executive member Aren Sanikian addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, co-hosted by the ANCA and the Armenian Assembly of America, in cooperation with the Congressional Armenian Caucus

Rep. Gabe Amo (D-RI), matched words with action — reporting that on the very morning of the commemoration he had pressed the State Department in committee on the absence of foreign commercial service officers at the U.S. Embassy in Armenia, and highlighting his leadership of a committee-passed amendment requiring the State Department to actively press for the protection of Armenian heritage sites, release of prisoners, and safe return of refugees. “Justice, security, dignity for the Armenian people are not optional,” Amo said. “They’re essential.”

Rep. George Latimer (D-NY) widened the lens, speaking to the bipartisan breadth of the gathering and the shared sense of purpose that unites members who do not share Armenian heritage: “We don’t share your heritage, but we share your sense of purpose for the future.”

Maryland State Delegate Dr. Lorig Charkoudian, whose grandparents survived the Genocide and fled from Marash and Aintab, addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration

Armenia Security Partnership Act (H.R.6840)
With the Armenia Security Partnership Act drawing broad bipartisan support throughout the evening’s proceedings, members pressed for its passage as the essential legislative vehicle to strengthen Armenia’s deterrence and hold Azerbaijan accountable for continued aggression.

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ), co-chair and founding member of the Congressional Armenian Caucus, traced the legislation’s origins to Speaker Pelosi’s 2022 congressional delegation to Armenia — a visit that made clear, in his words, that a strong Armenia “both militarily and economically, is probably the most important thing that we can do as the United States government.” He pledged the Caucus’s continued engagement regardless of which administration holds power: “Those goals are bipartisan. And those goals will continue regardless of which government is in charge in Armenia or in the United States.”

Rev. Father Hovsep Karapetyan offers the opening invocation at the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, praying for “renewed commitment to justice, peace, and defense of human dignity.”

Rep. David Valadao (R-CA), Armenian Caucus co-chair, underscored the stakes of impunity from the other side of the aisle, warning that the world’s failure to hold perpetrators accountable creates conditions for future atrocities: “When the world fails to acknowledge and hold perpetrators accountable, it creates opportunities for atrocities to happen again.” Valadao reaffirmed his co-sponsorship of both the Armenia Security Partnership Act and the Armenian Genocide Education Act.

Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA), vice chair of the Armenian Caucus, sharpened the argument, calling genocide denial “the last step of a genocide — and the first step in the next genocide,” pointing directly to the Trump administration’s deletion of a post recognizing the Armenian Genocide — “No, the error was the deletion” — and issuing a clear strategic warning: “What Azerbaijan did to Artsakh, they would do to Armenia if Armenia was defenseless. Only strengthening Armenia, as we should have done with Ukraine, can prevent the next war of acquisition and conquest.”

Rev. Father Sarkis Aktavoukian of Soorp Khatch Armenian Church closes the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration with a prayer calling on God to “spare others from tyranny and persecution.”

Rep. Mike Levin (D-CA) closed the section on a note of moral clarity, calling out leaders who refuse to name what happened as genocide and making the connection between recognition and security explicit: “Refusing to call out atrocities or set the historical record right is a shameful moral failure, and it does nothing to advance the cause of peace or security. It does the exact opposite.”

Azerbaijan Sanctions and Global Magnitsky
Members pressed for enforcement of existing U.S. accountability tools — from the Global Magnitsky Act to the Azerbaijan Sanctions Review Act — making clear that diplomatic engagement with Baku must be paired with real consequences for war crimes and human rights abuses.

Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, calling out the current administration’s retreat from Armenian Genocide recognition and demanding accountability for Armenian hostages still held by Azerbaijan

Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA), author of the Global Magnitsky Act and representative from Worcester — home to the oldest Armenian community in America — anchored the section in the legislation he wrote: “It is important that we maintain vigilance with regard to Azerbaijan and its war crimes, but that we demand accountability. And that is what the Global Magnitsky Act is all about.”

Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV) built on that demand, highlighting the Azerbaijan Sanctions Review Act she introduced — targeting 53 Azerbaijani officials for State Department review and sanctioning — and noting a quieter but significant victory she had already secured: successfully pressing the Library of Congress to formally adopt the term “genocide” in its catalog. “Even if the Congress couldn’t pass it for a while,” she said, “we got the Library of Congress to make that distinction.”

Armenian Assembly of America Co-Chair Taline Yacoubian addresses the April 15 Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Commemoration, warning that “peace is necessary, but it must be durable.”

Rep. Jim Costa (D-CA) reflected on a lifetime of friendship with Armenian families in Fresno and called the community’s continued advocacy the engine behind every legislative advance, citing his support for the Azerbaijan Sanctions Review Act, H.R.5369, and the Armenian Genocide Education Act: “Your efforts are critical.”

Rep. Sanford Bishop (D-GA), citing Galatians 6:9 — “Let us not become weary in doing good” — closed the section with a charge rooted in 34 years of congressional engagement with Armenian Americans: “Yours is a righteous cause, and Congress cannot just be a bystander to history.”

Armenian Genocide Education Act (H.R.2585)
Members across both parties returned again and again to education as the foundation of prevention — pressing for passage of the Armenian Genocide Education Act and for a curriculum that ensures future generations understand not just what happened, but why it must never happen again.

Rep. Laura Friedman (D-CA), whose district encompasses the largest Armenian-American community outside of Armenia, framed education not as a matter of historical record alone but as active protection for Armenia’s future: “All of that is not just about remembering the past, but protecting Armenia and Armenians’ future.”

Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) brought the Greek-Armenian solidarity that has long defined the Caucus’s bipartisan character, noting that the Hellenic and Armenian Caucuses “work side by side” as a “natural fit” — and reaffirming his Republican co-sponsorship of the 2019 Genocide Resolution in the face of significant pressure: “People got a lot of pressure, but we stood by our faith.”

Rep. Luz Rivas (D-CA), whose San Fernando Valley district is home to the third-largest Armenian-American congressional constituency in the country, pressed for passage of the Armenian Genocide Education Act as the essential tool for prevention: “If we fail to recognize what happened 111 years ago or why these tragedies transpired in the way that they did, we will not be able to prevent future atrocities from happening.”

Rep. Delia Catalina Ramirez (D-IL) pledged that Armenian Americans in Illinois’ 3rd Congressional District would see action, not statements: “I want you to know that you are seen and valued, and we have work to do here in the halls of Congress.”

Rep. Dave Min (D-CA) closed with a warning drawn from history and aimed squarely at the present, drawing a cautionary parallel between the Ottoman Empire’s nationalist scapegoating of Armenians and today’s global rise of extremism and hyper-nationalism: “Those who cannot remember history are condemned to repeat it.”

Community Leaders and Clergy
Armenian Assembly of America Co-Chair Taline Yacoubian addressed the inseparability of memory and present-day responsibility, warning that cultural erasure and forced displacement are deliberate tools of ongoing destruction. “When cultural sites are erased, it is not only stones that are lost. It is the visible record of a people,” she said. “Peace is necessary, but it must be durable.”

Congressional Armenian Staff Association executive member Aren Sanikian spoke to the power of Armenian Americans working within the halls of democracy itself. “My family’s story is the Armenian story. From Adana, Erzurum, and Moush to Fresno, our roots were torn from the earth and replanted again and again by people who refused to disappear. That is the inheritance I carry into these halls every single day.”

Maryland State Delegate Dr. Lorig Charkoudian — whose grandparents survived the Genocide and fled from Marash and Aintab, the very cities referenced in Kerkonian’s keynote — connected personal testimony to present duty: “It is our duty to have love and courage and resilience and determination that is as strong so that we can face the current genocidal tendencies, the current ethnic cleansing, the current threat to our people. In their honor, in their name, and in their love, we will continue.”

The program’s invocation was offered by Rev. Father Hovsep Karapetyan, who opened the evening with a prayer for “renewed commitment to justice, peace, and defense of human dignity.” Rev. Father Sarkis Aktavoukian of Soorp Khatch Armenian Church closed the program, calling on God to “spare others from tyranny and persecution” and giving thanks to the United States for being a refuge for the Armenian people. The program garnered broad support from Greater Washington DC community groups and Armenian American advocates from across the U.S., including the perennial participation of youth from the Homenetmen Armenian General Athletic Union and Scouts and Armenian Youth Federation.

Armenian Americans can visit the website to send messages to their Representatives to support ANCA’s ongoing advocacy on behalf of Armenia’s security, the release of Armenian hostages, and the right of return for Artsakh’s displaced population.

Stable rating or stable stagnation? How to comment on top ranking

April 17, 2026

Government 2021-2026 In the report on the progress and results of the 2025 implementation of the activity plan, the fact that the leading international rating agencies did not lower Armenia’s rating is presented as a serious achievement.

On page 25 of the report it is stated: “In 2025, three leading international rating agencies reaffirmed Armenia’s sovereign ratings, emphasizing the country’s macroeconomic stability. In particular, Moody’s maintained the Ba3 rating with a stable outlook, while Fitch and Standard & Poor’s reaffirmed the BB- rating, changing the outlook from stable to positive.

However, the reality hidden under these formulations is much more modest than the RA government tries to present. 2025 According to Moody’s, RA sovereign rating was Ba3, while in 2017 it was ‘B1’, just one rank lower. It’s a similar picture for Fitch. 2025 the rating was “BB-“, and in 2017 – “B”, which is again only one position lower than the current level. In other words, in more than 7 years, not a qualitative progress was recorded, but an almost insignificant shift.

Furthermore, both Moody’s Ba3 and Fitch’s BB- ratings are ‘non-investment grade’, ‘speculative’. This fact itself contradicts the assessments made about “stability”. if the country had a really solid and predictable economic environment, it would be expressed by a higher “investment” rating.

In the Armenian reality, there are a number of factors that directly affect the ratings, and the neglect of which is difficult to cover up with “stability”. First of all, the ongoing uncertainty of the security environment, tensions and the resulting economic risks, which remain a key concern for investors. Second, institutional weaknesses: lack of trust in the judicial system, problems of legal predictability, repeated accusations of selective justice.

Third, the structural vulnerability of the economy, the significant dependence on external factors and a limited number of sectors, which makes any external shock a systemic risk. Finally, issues of public administration effectiveness: frequently changing political messages, lack of long-term strategies, and lack of clear accountability mechanisms. All these circumstances not only restrain the growth of the rating, but also explain why the unchanged indicator is presented as a success.

As a result, it turns out that more than seven years of activity of the government formed after 2018 has led to only one degree of improvement, without systemic progress. This indicates that the implemented “reforms” did not create a reliable institutional basis, nor a security and economic environment that could actually increase the country’s credit standing.

In this context, the RA government’s approach is particularly telling: the achievement is not progress, but avoidance of deterioration. When the country remains at the same “speculative” level for years, “stability” is more reminiscent of staying put than development. And here a natural question arises. if this is presented as success, then how to characterize stagnation or regression?

Pashinyan confessed to the crime

April 17, 2026

“Under the conditions of today’s system, we will never have a sense of fairness and justice, because the judicial and justice systems in RA generally have no organic connection with the highest source of power, the people. The issue should be resolved by adopting a new Constitution in the near future”, the other day announced Nikol Pashinyan inventing another artificial justification for changing the Constitution.

He once again spoke at length about the fact that the current RA Constitution does not express the will of the people and “does not have an organic connection with the highest source of power”.

“In this case, do whatever you want, there will be no sense of fairness and justice, because the Constitution should be an expression of the free will of the people, and we must admit that we do not have such a Constitution and, unfortunately, we never had it,” he said.

Let’s assume that Nikol Pashinyan is not manipulating because of habit and inability to disobey Azerbaijan’s demand, but he is correct in saying that the Constitution has no organic connection with the people. In other words, according to his logic and his favorite vocabulary, it has something to do with criminal oligarchy, robbery, forgery. In that case, it turns out that the revolution that brought tragedies to itself, the government, Armenia and the Armenian people, is not “velvet, non-violent, popular”, as has been heard for 8 years, but criminal-oligarchic, looting and falsified.

Read also

  • The Constitution is not a menu. there can be no favorite and no favorite clauses; Davit Harutyunyan
  • SAFE CHOICE: ARMENIA AT THE CROSSROADS OF PACIFIING THE WINNER AND SEARCHING FOR A GUARANTEE OF PEACE 
  • “They have made the war the main factor of the elections, they are blackmailing the people with threats.” Arman Tatoyan

After 2018, he has been bragging to the world that he came to power only and exclusively through the constitutional way, that his seizure of power is more constitutional than the idea of ​​the constitution itself. Now it turns out that for 8 years he has been in power in Armenia with a Constitution that has no organic connection with the people. Maybe that is also why he established an organic connection with the first Azerbaijani demand and the first Azerbaijani interest, naming it “Peace”.

The reality is that all RA Constitutions, including the current one, with many problems, ensured the normal and safe life of the people in the homeland that is several thousand square kilometers larger than today. It was an unspoken but highly organic connection – the source of power – between the people and the Constitution. Nikol Pashinyan, however, has turned the source of power into a fountain, a fountain, in memory of the former Armenia and perpetuating his own power. Inorganic, like his own walking statue in his own birthplace.

In the upcoming elections, the people who are the source of power in a broad sense have one thing to do: either confirm the consolidation of their own country, its past and future with the date of 2018-2026, or form a new government in a way that seems impossible at the moment, with the prospect of stopping the shame of the government that brought Armenia to this state.

Türkiye-Armenia Border Reopening: A Turning Point For The South Caucasus

EurasiaNet
April 17 2026

A partner post from the Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst.

Alpaslan Özerdem Apr 17, 2026

After more than three decades of closure, the Türkiye-Armenia border may soon reopen. A string of recent developments, including the launch of Turkish Airlines flights to Yerevan, agreements to simplify visa procedures, and moves toward direct land trade, suggest that normalization is shifting from cautious diplomacy toward practical implementation. If it does, it would mark one of the most consequential geopolitical shifts in the South Caucasus since the end of the Cold War. Yet reopening the border will require careful political management. Without it, renewed contact could generate friction rather than stability.

BACKGROUND:

The land border between Türkiye and Armenia has been closed since 1993. Ankara shut the crossing in solidarity with Azerbaijan during the first war over Nagorno-Karabakh. Since then, the border has symbolized one of the most enduring geopolitical divides in the region. For communities on both sides, the closure produced long-term economic and social consequences. Armenia’s access to regional markets has remained constrained, while eastern Turkish border regions have also faced limited cross-border economic opportunities.

Regional dynamics began shifting after the 2020 war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which altered the political balance in the South Caucasus and created new incentives for diplomatic engagement. In the aftermath of the war, Ankara and Yerevan appointed special envoys in 2021 to explore the possibility of restoring diplomatic relations and reopening the border.

Since then, negotiations have progressed slowly but steadily. Several confidence-building measures have been agreed and some already implemented. These include agreements allowing third-country citizens to cross the border, the resumption of direct flights between Istanbul and Yerevan, and discussions on facilitating trade and travel. In early 2026, the pace of normalization accelerated visibly. In March, Turkish Airlines launched regular scheduled flights on the Istanbul-Yerevan route. The two governments agreed to simplify visa procedures, and reports emerged that direct land trade between Türkiye and Armenia would begin as part of a broader US-led Caucasus peace push. Last December Bloomberg reported that Ankara was weighing a full reopening of the border within six months, while senior Turkish officials publicly expressed optimism, stating that they hoped “everything develops quickly.”

Physical preparations also indicate growing readiness. Armenia has renovated the Margara checkpoint on its side of the border, declaring the facility technically ready for operation. Türkiye has likewise upgraded infrastructure at the Alican crossing. These preparations suggest that the technical conditions for reopening could be met relatively quickly if political decisions align.

Still, reopening the border remains politically sensitive. For Türkiye, the process remains closely linked to the broader relationship between Armenia and Azerbaijan, particularly negotiations over a comprehensive peace agreement following the collapse of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh authorities in 2023. Since last August, when the two countries signed several accords at the White House, Baku and Yerevan have taken a number of steps forward, including facilitating transit trade to Armenia through Azerbaijan and Armenia’s recent agreement with the United States on the TRIPP transit route, which will facilitate the operation of a transit route between Azerbaijan and its enclave of Nakhchivan in southern Armenia. These are promising steps, but a final peace agreement is still pending, which Türkiye must take into consideration.

Ankara has long coordinated its approach toward Armenia with Baku. Turkish policymakers have repeatedly emphasized that normalization should not undermine Azerbaijan’s strategic interests, and progress in Türkiye-Armenia relations has often moved in parallel with developments in Armenia-Azerbaijan negotiations. How close are the parties to a final agreement on the border? The string of practical steps in early 2026 suggests the process has crossed a threshold from symbolic confidence-building to operational preparation. Yet the absence of a finalized Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal means that Ankara retains a political brake on the timeline. A stall or deterioration in those talks could slow or freeze the border track; conversely, a breakthrough could accelerate it rapidly.

Domestic political considerations also matter. In Armenia, normalization with Türkiye remains controversial for segments of society deeply affected by historical grievances, and the issue will feature in the country’s upcoming June parliamentary elections. In Türkiye, policymakers must balance diplomatic engagement with Armenia against their longstanding strategic partnership with Azerbaijan.

IMPLICATIONS:

If and when the border reopens, the effects will extend well beyond bilateral relations. Armenia has long depended on limited transit routes through Georgia and Iran to access external markets. Opening the Turkish border would provide an alternative corridor, linking Armenia more directly to European and Middle Eastern trade networks. It would also reinforce Türkiye’s role as a regional connector between the South Caucasus and broader Eurasian markets. In this context, reopening the border aligns with wider connectivity initiatives such as the Middle Corridor, which aims to strengthen east-west trade routes across the region.

Russia’s influence in the South Caucasus has weakened since the start of the war in Ukraine and the collapse of its peacekeeping mission in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023. As Moscow’s role recedes, regional actors are increasingly seeking alternative economic and diplomatic partnerships. In parallel, instability in the Middle East, including conflict involving Iran, has heightened uncertainty along key transit routes. For Armenia, which has relied on access through Iranian territory, reopening the Turkish border would reduce dependence on a single corridor and provide greater strategic flexibility.

On the other hand, the expansion of trade and transit routes associated with reopening the Türkiye-Armenia border could deepen regional interdependence and, in turn, support longer-term peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Durable reconciliation rarely rests on diplomatic agreements alone; it often emerges when economic cooperation and shared interests make renewed conflict increasingly costly. Expanded trade, transportation links, and cross-border mobility can help create these incentives by encouraging regional actors to view cooperation not as a concession but as mutual gain.

At the local level, decades of closure have left many towns near the frontier economically stagnant. Renewed cross-border access could stimulate transportation links, tourism, and commercial exchange. Armenian producers would gain easier access to Turkish markets, while Turkish businesses could expand trade with Armenia and potentially beyond. However, regions that have been economically isolated for decades may struggle to adjust quickly to new competitive pressures, and if cross-border trade develops unevenly, local communities could perceive the reopening as disruptive rather than beneficial.

The practical challenges of reopening should not be underestimated. Local authorities, customs agencies, border police, and regulatory bodies on both sides have never previously operated together. Communities along the frontier have lived in close geographical proximity but political separation for decades. In the Armenian village of Margara, residents have long lived within sight of the Turkish side of the river without direct contact. Renewed engagement may generate economic and cultural exchange, but it could also expose differences in administrative practices, expectations, and social attitudes that will require careful management on both sides.

CONCLUSIONS:

The reopening of the Türkiye-Armenia border represents more than a bilateral diplomatic milestone. It reflects a broader transformation in the political landscape of the South Caucasus. The rapid accumulation of practical steps in early 2026, from flights to visa agreements to land trade, indicates that the process has moved beyond the realm of aspirational diplomacy. Yet the outcome is not guaranteed. The process remains closely linked to developments in Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, domestic political considerations in both countries, and evolving regional geopolitics. Whether Ankara ultimately opens the border before or after a finalized Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal will be a critical signal of how much Türkiye is willing to decouple the two tracks. Whether the border ultimately becomes a bridge between the two societies or simply another contested frontier will depend on how effectively these challenges are addressed not only in the coming months, but in the longer term.

 

This article was originally published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst and is reprinted under a partner post arrangement with Eurasianet.

Alpaslan Özerdem is Dean of the Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution at George Mason University. Olesya Vartanyan is a conflict analyst specializing in South Caucasus security and peace processes and a PhD student at George Mason University.

We Will Have a Strong Armenia Very Soon – Samvel Karapetyan speaks in court

Aysor, Armenia
April 17 2026

“There will be changes, we will have a strong Armenia very soon,” said Samvel Karapetyan, leader of the “Strong Armenia” party, speaking in the courtroom.

“Lawyer Vardevanyan presented all the illegalities contained in these accusations, so I have nothing to add in that regard. I only want to note that all the flaws in our legal system, I am convinced, are being directed against me and our entire team in an attempt to suppress our people’s aspiration for a strong Armenia. But I assure you, they will not succeed. Everything is moving forward. There will be changes, and we will have a strong Armenia very soon,” Karapetyan said.

The court is currently examining the issue of Samvel Karapetyan’s preventive measure.

His defense attorney, Aram Vardevanyan, has filed a motion to lift the house arrest imposed on him, proposing instead to increase the bail amount. According to the lawyer, Karapetyan is prepared to add approximately 400 million drams to the already set 4 billion drams, noting that no violations have been recorded over the past 10 months.

It is also noted that, in parallel with the court proceedings, Karapetyan’s supporters are holding a protest in the courthouse yard, demanding his release.

Swiss MP says Yerevan summits of historic significance for Armenia-EU ties

Politics09:32, 16 April 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Stefan Müller-Altermatt, a member of Switzerland’s National Council, said that hosting the European Political Community summit and the first Armenia-European Union summit in Yerevan is of historic significance and reflects Armenia’s progress toward European integration.

Speaking in an interview with Armenpress, Müller-Altermatt noted that the upcoming summits, scheduled to take place in May in Yerevan, demonstrate Armenia’s growing engagement with European partners and its commitment to deepening ties with the European Union.

– What political message does the holding of the European Political Community Summit in Yerevan carry?

-When the European political community – which Russia so clearly shuns – discusses security and cooperation in Armenia, this sends a clear signal: Armenia is slipping out of Russia’s sphere of influence and, rather than being punished for it, is being rewarded – namely, with greater recognition in Europe.    

– How do you assess the historical significance of the first Armenia-EU Summit?

-The summit is of enormous historical significance. It demonstrates that Armenia is to be integrated into Europe on an equal footing. Even though, naturally, EU accession remains a distant prospect despite this summit, it can nevertheless now be discussed about integration without membership.

-Can we say that this is a new stage on Armenia’s path to European integration?

-You could certainly put it that way. But people in Armenia aren’t naive, and unfortunately they’ve been let down by Europe far too often. A summit alone doesn’t make a partnership – just making speeches at a summit doesn’t help Armenia. What’s needed isn’t just words, but action on the part of the EU.

-What are the main areas where Armenia and the EU can deepen cooperation in the near future?

-The areas of energy, transport and infrastructure offer the greatest potential for both sides. If Armenia can reduce its dependence on Russia by expanding renewable energy, modernising its electricity grid and connecting to regional electricity markets, thereby becoming part of the European energy area, this would also represent an enormous strategic gain for the EU. The same applies, of course, to the transport sector: logistics corridors between Europe and Central Asia via Armenia benefit both Europe and Armenia.

That said, most people in Armenia would probably be delighted if visa facilitation measures were introduced quickly. Unfortunately, this is becoming an increasingly politically sensitive issue within the EU – immigration is sparking ever more debate.

– How can this summit affect the security situation in the South Caucasus?

-We must be honest with ourselves: the EU has neither the military capability nor the will to act as an effective guarantor of security in the South Caucasus. Civilian missions and assistance with crisis prevention are, unfortunately, the most that can be expected from the EU in this regard. Regrettably, the EU remained silent during the ethnic cleansing in Nagorno-Karabakh, thereby undermining international law. As a non-military power, it would have had the opportunity to take a strong stance as a champion of international law. However, the EU has enormous energy interests in Azerbaijan. That is why it has remained silent on the violations of international law. The people of Karabakh are the ones suffering as a result. One could also say: in fact, the EU has a lot of making up to do with regard to Armenia and, above all, Karabakh. When it comes to security, it cannot do so – so it should focus on other areas instead.

-What new economic opportunities can open up for Armenia after this summit?

-In the long term, economic development must, of course, form the core of negotiations with the EU. There is a need for trade facilitation and the integration of Armenian companies into supply chains. If partnership agreements can achieve precisely this, then Armenia stands to gain a great deal economically. And if the Russian economy also recovers in the future, Armenia will have excellent prospects as a trading partner in both economic areas.

-Can Armenia become an important transit or energy partner for the EU?

-Here, too, we must be honest and admit that the geographical circumstances suggest that Armenia is unlikely to be of significant importance to the EU in the energy or transit sectors. Armenia has no direct oil or gas export capacity, and energy exports to the EU are severely limited by geographical and geopolitical factors. Armenia can be an innovation partner for the EU, but not a primary energy supplier. Armenia should seek to build on this position as an innovation partner.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Pashinyan: Citizens feel peace as it drives economic growth

Politics10:43, 16 April 2026
Read the article in: العربيةՀայերենქართულიRussian中文

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that citizens in Armenia feel a greater sense of peace than the government had expected, linking this perception to stability in the country and improvements in social and economic conditions.

“Citizens primarily feel peace on a psychological and emotional level, because there is calm in the country. The tension, strain, and intensity that we used to feel have now been replaced by a sense of tranquility, and I believe people also intuitively understand that the health insurance system, pension increases, and other measures are not directly, but indirectly, linked to peace,” the prime minister said in parliament during the debates on his administration’s 2025 report.

Pashinyan emphasized that if there were no confidence in peace and the government were expecting new escalations, it would not allocate such substantial resources to social sectors.

“Peace has created the conditions for economic growth. Citizens feel peace more strongly than we even expected,” Pashinyan said.

Published by Armenpress, original at 

“Armenian Heritage: Meghri – CIS Cultural Capital” stamp cancelled

Culture19:35, 16 April 2026
Read the article in: FrançaisՀայերենRussian

Stamp cancellation on “Armenian Heritage: Meghri – the Cultural Capital of the CIS” took place at the Agarak House of Culture.

From April 16, 2026, a stamp dedicated to the theme “Armenian Heritage: Meghri – the Cultural Capital of the CIS” has been put into circulation.

The cancellation was carried out by Deputy Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of the Republic of Armenia Daniel Danielyan, Executive Director of the Interstate Fund for Humanitarian Cooperation of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Anatoly Iksanov, Head of the enlarged Meghri community Khachatur Andreasyan, and Koziev Shamsiddin, Deputy Director for Political, Humanitarian and Social Cooperation at the CIS Executive Committee.

The stamp, with a nominal value of 320 AMD, depicts the logo “Meghri – the Cultural Capital of the CIS,” and at the bottom of the stamp there is an inscription “MEGHRI – THE CULTURAL CAPITAL OF THE CIS” in English.

The author of the design is David Dovlatyan. The printing house is bpost Philately & Stamps Printing (Belgium). The dimensions are 40.0 × 30.0 mm, and the print run is 10,000 copies.

Published by Armenpress, original at 

CP is advancing its “black business” under noise

“Hraparak” daily writes:


Yesterday, the members of the Communist Party carried out a fierce campaign against the two women of the “Strong Armenia” party, who were detained the previous day, in order to discredit them as much as possible and to present the force founded by Samvel Karapetyan as distributing electoral bribes. They were live and taking notes, making announcements from the NA podium.


And although the opposition women’s lawyers declare that it is a fabricated proceeding, there are reports that the government deliberately made such a noise and is going to repeat it in the near future, so that it can create grounds for not registering “Strong Armenia”.


Article 19 of the Electoral Code prohibits during pre-election campaigns, as well as before and on the day of the election, candidates, parties participating in the elections… to promise drams, food, securities, goods or to provide services. The Electoral Code has established a clear procedure that in case of reports of electoral bribery, the CEC can apply to the court to reject the registration of the given party.


Therefore, they decided to make noise so that Pashinyan’s henchman Vahagn Hovakimyan would have grounds to appeal to the court.