HAAF Toronto: Opening of school for Madaghis Village by Baroness Cox

PRESS RELEASE

“Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund, Toronto
280 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 215,
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3B1, Canada
Contact : Migirdic Migirdicyan
Tel: (416) 332 0787
Fax: (416) 332 0736
e-mail : [email protected]

All-Armenian Fund Toronto – The Opening of the school for Madaghis
Village by Baroness Caroline Cox.
October 9, 2006 Toronto, ON – On Wednesday, September 27th, Hayastan
All-Armenian Fund Toronto Chapter opened another school in Karabagh,
this one for the village of Madaghis. Officials from the
Nagorno-Karabagh Republic, a group of Toronto Armenians, Yerevan,
Stepanakert and Toronto representatives of the All-Armenian Fund, Mrs.
Nora Kasparian; the principle of the school, teachers, students,
villagers and Baroness Caroline Cox, the Deputy Speaker of the House of
Lords participated in the opening ceremonies. Baroness Cox who had flown
in specifically for this opening gave a very moving speech and
congratulated the villagers and the students alike for this great
occasion. The honour of cutting the ribbon was given to Baroness Cox who
was accompanied by two grade 1 students.

The school which has been built for 150 students, has 11 classrooms, a
computer room, the principle’s office, the teachers’ office, a medical
room, a library and a function hall.

For additional information or a sample copy, please contact:

“Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund, Toronto
280 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 215,
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3B1, Canada
Contact : Migirdic Migirdicyan
Tel: (416) 332 0787
Fax: (416) 332 0736
e-mail : [email protected]

Hayastan Foundation Canada Inc. – “Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund is a
charitable organization, realizing humanitarian projects in Armenia and
Artsakh. During the last thirteen years, it has undertaken and
successfully completed numerous winter heating, water distribution,
gasification and school construction projects.

"Armenia Will Be A Stronger Country If It Holds Democratic Elections

“ARMENIA WILL BE A STRONGER COUNTRY IF IT HOLDS DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS”
MEDIAMAX armenian news agency
15.09.06
Weekly Analytical Report
Exclusive interview of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Evans to
Mediamax agency U.S. Ambassador John Evans completed his diplomatic
mission in Armenia.
Before his departure on September 10 he gave a farewell interview
to Mediamax.
– Mr. Evans, what do you consider to be your greatest achievement
during your service in Armenia?
– I think we achieved a lot. The conclusion of the Millenium Challenge
Compact that was signed at the end of March 2006 is probably the
biggest achievement. But as I have already said before, the work of
diplomacy is like gardening – it takes persistence and patience. And
we have had that kind of approach – we didn’t simply make a list of
things to achieve.
We have greater cooperation with Armenia in security and defense
matters.
It’s not only the question of the Armenian non-combatant contingent
that’s serving in Iraq, but also cooperation in the framework of
NATO. And I think we have also seen some progress in the strengthening
of democratic institutions.
I do think that the recent events – murders of officials and attacks
on journalists – are not a good sign. At the moment I am quite worried
about that. Journalists need to be protected as they carry out a very
crucial function in any democratic system.
– And what was your biggest disappointment during your work in Armenia?
– In general, I am not disappointed by my time here. The only thing
that would fit into the category you mentioned is the disappointment I
had when the constitutional referendum held in Armenia last November
apparently was not conducted in a totally honest way. I had had
very clear assurances from some very highly placed members of the
Armenian government. They assured me, crossing their heart, that there
would be no such falsifications. And I went out on a limb and took
a personal risk in supporting the substance of the constitutional
amendments. I did that because I felt that the Armenian people had
a right to know what the United States, as well as the European
Union, Council of Europe and the OSCE, thought about the content
of those amendments. So I took the risk, and I was criticized for
supporting those amendments. So I was very disappointed in the end
that apparently, and again nothing has been proven, but apparently
there was a falsification of the vote count.
– Last year you said in an interview to our agency, that “The lesson
of some other elections in this region ought to be clear to anyone
tempted to falsify election results: the people are not stupid,
and they will figure it out, and that will create a big problem,
fraught with great risks”.
What is your opinion on whether there are still many people in Armenia
who might have such a temptation during the elections in 2007 and 2008?
– Recent polling results that we have access to, conducted in Armenia
by the Gallup Organization, indicate that there is a lot of skepticism
about next year’s elections. I think that Armenia is headed in the
right direction, and one day or another, sooner or later, Armenia
will become a true democratic country. We believe that Armenia will
be a stronger country if it holds democratic elections, which are
the key to the legitimacy of the elected officials.
A year ago we were advised not to waste any more money on working with
Armenian political parties. But we went against the experts’ advice,
because we were not ready to give up on Armenian democracy. And I am
still not ready to give up. I think there are many people who do want
to see the elections be free and fair. They see the advantages of this
to Armenia–a country with no oil wealth and no hydrocarbons–but a
country that needs to preserve the respect of the democratic world,
the Western world, and needs to meet its own commitments to the Council
of Europe and to the OSCE. It’s a question of Armenia’s self-respect,
but it’s also a question of the respect of the world.
– Some U.S. experts are of the opinion that the power of the Armenian
Diaspora in the USA limits the opportunities of the United States to
encourage democratic changes in Armenia, as the Diaspora oppose any
criticism of the Armenian authorities from Washington. Do you agree
with such point of view?
– I do not. I think the opposite. I think the Armenian-American
community in various ways has a very positive impact on development
here. Of course, there is a certain sensitivity about open criticism,
but I have heard a lot of criticism precisely from Armenian-Americans,
who are disappointed that Armenia has not moved quickly enough towards
becoming a full-fledged democracy. So, I take the opposite view. I
think that Armenia’s international connections, not only with the
United States, but with France, with Russia, with other countries, are
one of the preconditions for building a strong democracy in Armenia.
– Despite the numerous efforts of the United States, Armenian-Turkish
relations are not normalized and the border remains closed. Do you
see any possibility for achieving some progress?
– Turkey is an ally of the United States, and I understand very well
the complications that Armenia has with its Turkish neighbors at the
moment. I do hope that wise people on the both sides of the border
will come to see the mutual advantages of trade across the border,
of cooperating on energy issues – Eastern Turkey is short of energy
and Armenia might be able to help in this regard.
I believe that diplomatic relations should be established between
Yerevan and Ankara. This is not an easy area, but the commonsense,
good judgment, and wisdom of people on both sides needs to be brought
to bear on this problem.
– This year the issue of providing for Armenia’s energy security
became a topic for active discussions. What kind of support can the
United States provide in this regard? In particular, U.S. Deputy
Assistant Secretary Daniel Fried, who visited Armenia this March,
said that Armenia’s desire to have a new nuclear power plant will be
seriously discussed in Washington.
– First of all, I would say that we have already helped a great deal
in studying the problem. We have worked very closely with the Ministry
of Energy. There was a conference in July about the least-cost option,
which the Ministry is discussing. There will be another conference,
I believe, in October to discuss this. But, the United States will
need to know a lot more about Armenia’s plans for its energy security
before any kind of discussion can happen about the future of nuclear
energy capacity. We see that the Metsamor reactor is coming to
the end of its useful life and should be decommissioned in 2015 or
2016. That is going to be an expensive process and we believe that
Armenia needs to plan now, if not already yesterday, for how it is
going to manage the expense of decommissioning the existing plant,
not to mention the enormous expense of building a follow-on plant.
– This year much has been said about the existing “window
of possibilities” for the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict. What is your opinion, has the window closed, or are there
still some hopes?
– As you know, I am not in the lead on this issue. Rather, Matthew
Bryza, the OSCE Minsk Co- Chair representing the United States,
is working on this. I will say that I think it was a very good
development that the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs decided this June
to make public the main elements of their discussions with the
sides so that the Armenian and Azerbaijani societies could discuss
these elements, think about them and decide what their attitude is
towards those elements. I think what they will find on both sides
is that the deal that was on the table, and is still on the table,
is really the best possible, most fair and long-lasting settlement
that can be reached. Another conflict in the South Caucasus would
be a disaster for both sides. It would undoubtedly be inconclusive,
it would cause more suffering, and it would set back the entire
region. Both sides need to think very hard about the way forward,
and try to find a peaceful settlement so that the entire region can
join the rest of the world in prosperity, stability, and peace.

www.mediamax.am

Turkey And Europe: The Dangers Of Divorce

TURKEY AND EUROPE: THE DANGERS OF DIVORCE
By Patrick Seale Special to Gulf News
Gulf News, United Arab Emirates
Oct 9 2006
The European Union is in danger of making a mistake of immense
strategic importance: instead of welcoming Turkey into its ranks it
is rebuffing it.
At the very moment when the West is in a mood of profound alienation
from the Arab and Muslim world – based largely on ignorance, prejudice
and mutual incomprehension – Europe is turning its back on the one
country uniquely able to serve as a bridge between East and West.
At the very moment when the Middle East is experiencing crises and
wars of unprecedented gravity, which threaten to overspill into
neighbouring countries and into Europe itself, Europe has failed to
grasp that Turkey could provide a key to regional security.
Turkey, heir to the Ottoman Empire and a founding member of Nato,
is a major regional power – dynamic, yet traditional; secular, yet
Muslim; democratic yet militarily powerful. Its ties with Europe are
centuries old. As its Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul likes to recall,
Turkey sent its first diplomatic envoy to France in 1495, while France
chose Istanbul as the site of its very first foreign embassy in the
16th century.
Today, Turkey could play a key role in stabilising Iraq and in helping
to mediate the Arab-Israeli conflict, since it is on good terms with
both sides. It has again demonstrated its commitment to regional
security by sending a thousand soldiers to help keep the peace in
southern Lebanon.
On November 9, the European Commission is due to publish a report on
its negotiations with Turkey over the past year, and on the progress
Turkey has made in carrying out the reforms Europe has demanded.
There are grave fears that this crucial report, which will set the
tone of future relations between the EU and Turkey, will be negative.
Instead of acknowledging Turkey’s very considerable efforts to meet
European norms and adopt European values – instead of looking forward
to Turkey’s great potential contribution to Europe’s security and
stability – it is likely to emphasise areas of continued disagreement,
demand still more concessions from Ankara and put the blame on Turkey
for the current stalemate.
Bad situation
So bad is the situation that many observers believe relations between
Turkey and Europe are heading for a breakdown. If these fears are
proved correct – if the commission’s report is indeed hard on Turkey –
European diplomacy will have suffered a considerable defeat.
The EU’s grudging attitude towards Turkish membership has already
created an anti-European backlash in Turkey, while at the same time
encouraging reactionary right-wing forces in Europe, especially in
Austria, Germany and France, to call for a suspension of negotiations
with Turkey.
One major subject of disagreement concerns the Mediterranean island
of Cyprus, divided between Greeks and Turks. The Greek part – the
Republic of Cyprus – is an EU member state, while the Turkish northern
part has not been recognised as a separate republic and suffers from
a commercial boycott.
The EU is demanding that Turkey open its ports and airports to the
Republic of Cyprus, which Ankara is obliged to do under its customs
agreement with the EU. But Ankara is refusing to comply until the EU
ends its commercial boycott of the Turkish part of the island – which
the EU promised to do so, but has so far not done. The outstanding
issue, therefore, would seem to be one of reciprocity. Fairness and
natural justice would suggest that the Turks have a point.
Moreover, Turkish Cypriots voted in favour of a plan put forward by
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan for the unification of the island,
whereas Greek Cypriots voted against. This, once again, would seem to
give the Turks the moral advantage. It should not be beyond the wit
of European diplomacy to find a solution to this heated but relatively
trivial dispute.
Another difficult hurdle Turkey faces is its historic responsibility
for the massacre of well over one million Armenians in 1915 during
the First World War, when the Ottoman Empire, then in its last years,
was engaged in a struggle with the western powers and czarist Russia.
The Turks feared the Armenians were a fifth column, allied to Russia.
This may go some way to explain, although it cannot justify, the
atrocities the Armenians suffered. Many were slaughtered while hundreds
of thousands died when they were mercilessly driven out of Anatolia,
the remnants of this death march eventually finding refuge in Syria
and Lebanon.
The EU would like Turkey to recognise this genocide, although it has
not made it a specific condition for membership. However, on a visit
this month to the Armenian capital of Yerevan, France’s President
Jacques Chirac declared that “France recognises the Armenian genocide”.
When asked whether Turkey should do so as a condition for EU
membership, he replied: “In all honesty, I believe so. Any country
is enhanced by recognising its dramas and mistakes.” He drew the
comparison with Germany which, to its credit, made amends for the
Holocaust.
Turkey has proposed setting up a committee of Turkish and Armenian
historians, which could include historians from other countries, to
examine the tragic events of 1915. It has committed itself to accept
its conclusions and to respond accordingly.
But whether this will be sufficient to persuade a deeply divided Europe
to accept Turkey as a full member must unfortunately remain in doubt.
Patrick Seale is a commentator and author of several books on Middle
East affairs.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Turkey "Threatens" France

TURKEY “THREATENS” FRANCE
Public Radio, Armenia
Oct 7 2006
Spokesman of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs Namik Tan
told the journalists that in case the French Parliament adopts draft
criminalizing the denial of the Armenian Genocide, Ankara “will hardly
be able to control” the counteraction of the Turkish society.
According to the Turkish “Zaman,” Namik Tan confessed that Ankara is
seriously concerned with the inclusion of the draft law in the agenda.
Noting that in the past the Armenian question was also poisoning
French-Turkish relations. Tan said that the current bill will become
a serious blow to the relations between the two countries and the
success achieved in the past. Tan said that with adoption of the bill,
“France will abolish the freedom of speech.”
Namik Tan expressed the hope that France will be reasonable enough
not to adopt the bill jeopardizing Turkish-French relations.
The Spokesman said also that the leadership of his country is making
every effort to prevent adoption of the bill. “October 4 President
Ahmed Sezer sent a letter to Jacques Chirac, Prime Minister Rejeb
Tayyib Erdogan will have a meeting with French businessmen in Istanbul,
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul had a telephone conversation with the
Foreign Minister of France,” said Spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of Turkey.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Foreign Ministers Of Armenia And Azerbaijan Met In Moscow

FOREIGN MINISTERS OF ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN MET IN MOSCOW
Public Radio, Armenia
Oct 7 2006
Under the auspices of the Minsk Group Co-Chairs, October 6 in Moscow
RA Minister of Foreign Affairs Vardan Oskanian participated in
consultations with the Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan. In a day-long
meeting at the Russian Foreign Ministry, the Ministers assessed
the current situation, identified the problematic issues still in
dispute, and heard the Co-Chairs’ ideas as to how to overcome those
differences. Minister Oskanian said the Armenian side has taken note
of the discussion, which he characterized as food for thought and said
they would receive serious consideration prior to the next meeting
before the end of the month.
In the framework of the Minsk Group meeting, Russian Minister
of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov received Minister Oskanian. The
bilateral meeting between the two ministers began with a discussion
on the negotiations and the situation surrounding Nagorno Karabakh.
They also discussed recent developments in the South Caucasus and
possible outcomes. Minister Oskanian and Minister Lavrov also explored
other bilateral issues.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Russia And Georgia Should Prove Friendship With Armenia In Deed

RUSSIA AND GEORGIA SHOULD PROVE FRIENDSHIP WITH ARMENIA IN DEED
PanARMENIAN.Net
09.10.2006 14:54 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ “One thing is clear: both Russia and Georgia should
do the utmost to alleviate tension and prevent any impact on Armenia,”
Armenian National Assembly Speaker Tigran Torosian told reporters
on Monday. “Otherwise the assurances of friendship will remain
mere words,” Torosian said adding that “words should be proved in
deed.” “It’s another matter what should be done for it. Russia and
Georgia should consider the problem first of all,” the Speaker said.
Tigran Torosian thinks use of Armenian interparliamentary ties for the
settlement of the Georgian-Russian collision unlikely. “The tension
between the states has deepened and resolution of the problem depends
on Russia and Georgia only,” he said.
“Maybe something can be done within international organizations,
the OSCE for example, but the situation depends on the leaders of
the two states,” he said.
Tigran Torosian also informed that the Russian-Georgian relations
may be considered at the sitting of the PACE Monitoring Committee on
October 16 in Yerevan. “It will help the committee members to have
a proper notion of the issue, since representatives of many states
are not well informed of the problem,” Torosian said, reported
newsarmenia.ru.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Turquie: Manifestations Contre Projet Loi Francais Sur Le Genocide A

TURQUIE: MANIFESTATIONS CONTRE PROJET LOI FRANCAIS SUR LE GENOCIDE ARMENIEN
Agence France Presse
8 octobre 2006 dimanche 2:46 PM GMT
Quelque 500 personnes ont manifeste dimanche contre le projet de loi
francais prevoyant une peine de prison pour la negation de caractère
genocidaire des massacres d’Armeniens pendant la Première Guerre
mondiale.
La foule — des militants d’un petit parti de gauche — a defile en
direction du consulat de France situe dans le centre d’Istanbul mais
a ete immobilisee par les vehicules blindes de la police anti-emeutes
avant d’acceder aux abords du consulat.
Seuls quelques manifestants ont ete autorises a poursuivre la marche
et a derouler devant le consulat des banderoles clamant “France stop!
Le boycott arrive” et “Le genocide est un mensonge”.
Le projet de loi qui doit etre examine jeudi par le Parlement francais
prevoit cinq ans de prison et une forte amende pour quiconque nierait
que les Armeniens ont ete victimes d’un genocide sous l’Empire ottoman.
Le ministre turc des Affaires etrangères a prevenu la France qu’elle
risquait de voir sa participation aux principaux projets economiques
en Turquie ecartee si elle adoptait cette loi.
La France a deja adopte en 2001 une resolution qualifiant de genocide
les massacres d’Armeniens, ce qui avait amene la Turquie, par mesure
de retorsion, a ecarter les entreprises francaises des appels d’offres
publics et a annuler plusieurs projets attribues a des entreprises
francaises.
Selon les Armeniens, 1,5 million des leurs ont ete tues dans des
massacres organises de 1915 a 1917.
La Turquie rejette categoriquement le qualificatif de genocide,
affirmant que 300.000 Armeniens et au moins autant de Turcs ont
trouve la mort au cours de troubles internes dus a des soulèvements
d’Armeniens independantistes soutenus par les envahisseurs russes
dans l’est de la Turquie, alors que l’empire ottoman se desintegrait.
–Boundary_(ID_xSIA+fOM3F+Y3ZRwDDMR uA)–
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Turkish PM To France: ‘Will You Arrest Me If I Reject Armeni

TURKISH PM TO FRANCE: ‘WILL YOU ARREST ME IF I REJECT ARMENIAN GENOCIDE CLAIMS?’
Journal of Turkish Weekly
Oct 8 2006
ISTANBUL and ANKARA – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan met
with French businessmen on Saturday to discuss the so-called Armenian
Genocide issue and continued to raise his objections against the
“Armenian Genocide” bill in France.
Erdogan said that as a third party France had no right to make
decisions over a war between two nations in the past, and added:
“How can this issue ever be relevant to France? Mind your own
business!”
Erdogan asked what France’s attitude would be if he, or one of his
ministers, rejected the alleged Armenian Genocide in France and
continued:
“Will you arrest us and send us to prison? Do you have the power to
do that?”
Erdogan said intimate relations between countries should not be
sacrificed for this kind of issue and added: “Turkey is not a tribal
country. You cannot conduct these kinds of operations concerning our
country. France has made a great mistake.”
The Turkish PM asserted this issue should be discussed by historians,
lawyers, art historians and scientists, and added there should be no
restrictions to discuss the issue.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Church Remains Central To Their Lives

CHURCH REMAINS CENTRAL TO THEIR LIVES
By Susan Chaityn Lebovits
The Boston Globe
Oct 8 2006
When an earthquake killed 25,000 people and left 500,000 homeless in
Armenia in 1988, Thomas Babigian bought a ticket and flew to Spitak
to help rebuild.
“It was pretty gut-wrenching,” said Babigian, who was 28 at the time.
For five weeks, he worked 11-hour days erecting homes while living
in a tent. The trip was arranged through the Armenian Church Youth
Organization of America and the St. James Armenian Apostolic Church.
The Watertown church — now marking its 75th anniversary — has played
a pivotal role in Babigian’s life and that of the large Armenian
community in Boston’s western suburbs.
This year, Babigian, his twin brother, Peter, and younger brother,
Vasken, are spearheading the church’s annual bazaar, which takes
place next weekend.
Growing up in Waltham, the three brothers did not learn to speak
English until they were nearly 6 years old, although their parents,
Garabed and Joan, were Massachusetts natives.
“Our grandparents on both sides spoke only Armenian, so it was
important to all of us that we were able to communicate with them,”
said Peter, 46, who works in the machine manufacturing business and
lives in Waltham with his wife, Gloria, and their three children.
“I remember kids laughing at us and saying, `There are the Babigian
boys — they can’t speak English,’ ” said Vasken , a 38-year-old real
estate attorney in Watertown.
The brothers long ago shed their childhood embarrassment and are
grateful that they grew up steeped in their Armenian culture. Besides
their family, they say, they have St. James to thank.
With a community of 2,500 families, it is one of the largest Armenian
churches in the United States.
The brothers’ mother, who was raised in Watertown, has attended the
church for 70 years.
“At 17 and 18, when `normal kids’ wanted to go to the beach, I was
here trying to learn the service in Armenian,” said Peter. “It gave
me religious and traditional fulfillment.”
Soon after he was ordained a sub deacon and began singing in the choir,
which he still does. He is also the fifth-grade acolyte director.
Thomas, a mortgage broker who lives in Westford with his wife,
Linda, thinks nothing of making the half-hour commute to take their
6-year-old son to Sunday school at St. James. “I want to give him
the same experience, since it was so important to me,” he said.
The brothers share the same olive skin and big dark eyes. They also
share an energy level that might be mistaken for one espresso too
many, but it comes in handy as they oversee preparations for next
weekend’s bazaar.
It will feature traditional foods like bourma, a rolled phyllo dough
with nuts, and manti, Armenian ravioli filled with meat; a live
auction, where people can bid on a Caribbean cruise with Armenians
from around the nation; and, in honor of the anniversary, a raffle
prize of $7,500 .
The church is their second home, they say.
In advance of its 75th anniversary, the brothers and their families
donated a 7-foot gold cross that sits on top of the church. Created
at SRP Sign Corp. in Waltham, it is constructed of cast aluminum with
23 -karat gold leafing. It took six months to make and was consecrated
and erected in 2004.
Vasken and his wife, Christina, are expecting their first child. They
plan to teach the baby to speak Armenian and English.
The St. James Church Bazaar is 10 a.m.-10 p.m. Friday and Saturday.
For more on the church, visit sthagop.com.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Astrakhan Region: General Information

Astrakhan Region
// GENERAL INFORMATION
Today is Oct. 7, 2006 3:23 PM (GMT +0400) Moscow
Endless steppes and the green banks of the Volga; the ice of the
Northern Caspian and flowering lotus fields-Astrakhan Region located
in the Caspian Lowlands of southwestern Russia is all of these
things. Its rich historical past, the unique beauty of its natural
landscapes, and age-old traditions of hospitality have attracted
tourists for a long time. The region was formed as part of the
Russian Federation on December 27, 1943 by decree of the Supreme
Soviet Presidium of the USSR, although Astrakhan Province was
actually formed by Peter the Great in November 1717. It has an
exceptionally favorable geographical location as a link between the
Northern Caucasus and southern Russia and between Kazakhstan and
Central Asia. It also connects Russia with Iran via the Caspian Sea.
Astrakhan Region extends 120 km from west to east between Kalmykia
and Kazakhstan and 375 km from north to south along the Volga and
Akhtuba rivers to the Caspian Sea. It covers an area of 44 100 km2 or
0.3% of the area of the Russian Federation and borders on Kazakhstan
in the east, Volgograd Region in the north and northwest, and the
Republic of Kalmykia in the west.
Despite the region’s nearness to the sea, it has a severe dry
continental climate, with annual precipitation ranging from 180-200
mm in the south to 280-290 mm in the north; most of the precipitation
(70-75%) falls in the warm season. Winter precipitation is in the
form of snow, wet snow, and rain. In summer, torrential rains are
accompanied by thunderstorms and sometimes hail. The average yearly
temperature is from 8.5 to 10 °C with a maximum of +42 °C and a
minimum of -30 °C. About 70% of the region is desert or semidesert.
The topography is flat with salt dome uplifts.
Astrakhan Region has been Russia’s “fish plant” for the past 400
years. It is known for sterlet soup, sturgeon, and black caviar and
is the capital of the Caspian fisheries. Fish are not only caught
here, but are also processed into high-quality products. Astrakhan’s
processing plants dry and smoke Caspian roach (also called vobla) and
prepare balyk [cured steaks of sturgeon and other similar fish],
Caspian herring, and various canned fish.
The region is made up of 11 rural districts, 6 cities (the largest
are Astrakhan, Akhtubinsk, Kamyzyak, Znamensk, and Kharabali), and
442 villages and other small communities. The capital is the old
Russian city of Astrakhan situated on the scenic banks of the Volga
River. The city lies 1534 km southeast of Moscow on islands of the
Volga delta and is known for its large number of bridges over the
branches and channels of the Volga that pass through it.
The first written mentions of Astrakhan date from the 13th century
when the Astrakhan Khanate was formed in the Lower Volga after the
collapse of the Golden Horde. For several centuries, Astrakhan was
the crossroads of trade routes between Europe and Asia.
Today, Astrakhan (pop. about 484 000) is an important industrial and
cultural center and a major cargo transfer point from rail to sea and
river transport and vice versa. The city’s main industrial sectors
are shipbuilding, the light and food industries, and engineering and
metalworking. Znamensk is a city of missile specialists. It is a
relatively young city that grew up from mud huts and tents, and its
history is inseparably linked with the Kapustin Yar test range.
Through the efforts of its residents, the streets of Kapustin Yar
gradually became green. Thousands of trees were planted in parks and
around houses, barracks, and soldiers’ messes. Everyone from generals
to soldiers and pensioners to first-grade pupils had their own
“personal trees” to care for.
Akhtubinsk (pop. 50 800) is a regionally administered district center
292 km north of Astrakhan. Two railway stations (Vladimirovka and
Akhtuba) on the Volgograd-Astrakhan line and a river wharf are
located in the city, and the Moscow-Astrakhan and the
Volgograd-Astrakhan highways pass through it on the right and left
banks of the Volga, respectively.
The city of Akhtubinsk was formed in 1959 from the communities of
Vladmirovka, Petropavlovka, and Akhtuba and a military housing
complex. Its industries include a shipbuilding and repair yard, a
brickyard, a canning plant, a dairy, a meat-packing plant, and a
bakery. Akhtubinsk is also the transfer point from which the Bassol
Company ships salt extracted from Lake Baskunchak. The institutions
of higher education include a branch of the Moscow Aviation Institute
(MAI). The city’s main point of interest in the memorial complex
dedicated to aviation and the test pilots who perished.
Kamyzyak (pop. 15 800) is a district center 35 km south of Astrakhan.
The city was founded in 1973 on the Volga delta in the Caspian
Lowlands. It is close to the Astrakhan I railway station, and the
highway to Astrakhan passes through it. Present-day Kamyzyak is the
center of an agricultural district with food-industry companies. A
research institute for irrigated vegetable and melon cultivation is
also located here.
Narimanov (pop. 11 600) is a district center 48 km northwest of
Astrakhan in the Caspian Lowlands on the right bank of the Volga. It
is 40 km from the Trusovo railway station on the Astrakhan-Gudermes
line and is just off the Astrakhan-Volgograd highway. The city was
formed from the town of Nizhnevolzhsk in 1984 and named in honor of
the Soviet political and party figure N.N. Narimanov. Narimanov is
the site of the Lotus (Lotos) plant, which produces superstructure
modules of floating drilling units.
Kharabali (pop. 19 100) is a district center 142 k from Astrakhan in
the Caspian Lowlands on the left bank of the Akhtuba River (an arm of
the Volga). The Astrakhan-Saratov railway line runs through the city.
It has been a city since 1974, and during this time, a vegetable
canning plant and dairy have been built and are in operation here and
a local history museum has been established.
Archeological monuments include the 13th-century city of Sarai-Batu,
the former capital of the Golden Horde, discovered 40 km southeast of
Kharabali, and a Kalmyk Buddhist monastery (khurul) built after 1812,
discovered 70 km south of the city.
The first inhabitants of what is now Astrakhan Region were Sarmatian
tribes. Their descendents, the Ases, who received a charter (tarkhan)
from Batu Khan, gave their name to the city of Astrakhan. The
Astrakhan Khanate that formed was a typical feudal state with a
population of nomadic cattle herders. Astrakhan was considered a
major commercial center where trade was conducted or through which
merchants from Venice, Khorezem, Bukhara, Kazan, the Crimea, and
Russia transported goods to other countries. The territory’s
remoteness and the demand for labor attracted large numbers of
Russian migrants, who quickly populated Astrakhan and formed the
settlements of Sianova, Bezrodnaya, Terebilovka, Soldatskaya, and
Yamgurcheeva around it. Tatars and Armenians who had settled near the
city likewise formed their own Tatarskaya and Armyanskaya
settlements.
Today, the region’s ethnic mix includes nearly 130 nationalities.
Russians make up most of the population (72%) followed by Kazakhs
(13%), mainly in Volodarsky and Krasnoyarsky districts. Next come
Tatars (7.2%), mainly in Privolzhsky and Narimanovsky districts;
Ukrainians (2%); Chechens (1%); Kalmyks (0.8%); Azerbaijanis (0.5%);
Belarussians and Nogais (0.4% each); Armenians and Dargins (0.3%
each); Gypsies, Turkmen, and Jews (0.2% each); and others (1.5%).
After centuries of coexistence, the boundaries between nations and
their languages, customs, and cultures have disappeared. Astrakhan
Region is considered one of Russia’s most multinational regions,
mainly as a result of migration from former Soviet republics and many
other parts of the country. Most migrants come from Kazakhstan, which
shows in the large number of Kazakhs in the region’s total
population.
At the same time, however, the demographic situation in Astrakhan
Region is deteriorating just as it is in the rest of Russia. Figures
showing a decrease in the resident population for the past 20 years
are disturbing.
The number of births is less than the number of deaths in all of the
region’s population centers except Krasnoyarsky District and the city
of Znamensk; in other districts (Ikryaninsky, Volodarsky,
Kharabalinsky, Narimanovsky, and Akhtubinsky), the social demographic
situation is considered difficult. The number of deaths over the
number of births is increasing, and birthrates are falling even as
the number of women of childbearing age is increasing.
The average age of people living in the region is 35.7 years and the
population distribution by age group is as follows: children from 0
to 15 years, 24.2%; men and women from 16 up to pension age [60 for
men and 55 for women], 57%; and men and women of pension age, 18.8%.
The number of registered marriages among young people between 18 and
25 is decreasing, while the number of divorces is increasing. Over
the last several years, the number of pensioners has remained almost
unchanged at the same time as the proportion of the population of
working age and under has been decreasing, leading to gradual aging
of the region’s population. About 240 000 pensioners are registered
at social welfare agencies and receive monetary and food aid along
with pensions.
Out of the total population of Astrakhan Region, 67% live in urban
areas and only 33% in rural areas.
HISTORY
Astrakhan is an old, hospitable city under the dazzling southern sun,
the pearl of the Lower Volga long known as a major industrial center
not only in Russia, but also in Europe. Astrakhan has been called the
“Fishing Capital”, the “Gateway to the Caspian”; and the “Venice of
the Volga”. All of these names reflect the geographical and economic
position of this outpost and transit center at the mouth of a great
river where vital water and land routes intersect.
The region’s position at the meeting point of East and West has
determined its historical and cultural development. The Lower Volga
and Northern Caspian regions have a unique history as areas where the
tides of different civilizations mingled and new cities were born,
including the capitals of once powerful states like Itil, the center
of the Khazar Kingdom in the 9th century, and Sarai-Batu, the capital
of the Mongolian state known as the Golden Horde.
In 1242, Batu Khan, the grandson of Genghis Khan, made the Lower
Volga the center of his great state. Sarai-Batu was a city of
splendid palaces and mosques and a center of skilled tradesmen that
stood at the historical crossroads of the Great Volga caravan route
and the Great Silk Road leading from China to Europe and Rome. The
history of Astrakhan itself goes back to the heyday of the Golden
Horde.
After the Astrakhan Khanate was annexed to Russia in 1556, the city
was moved from the right bank of the Volga to the left, where a
Russian fortress (Kremlin) was built in 1558. The Artilleriyskaya (or
Pytochnaya), Krymskaya, and Zhitnaya towers are the oldest ones in
the Kremlin. Altogether, seven of the Kremlin’s guard towers have
been preserved, two of which (Krasnaya and Artilleriyskaya) have been
turned into museums. The buildings of Uspensky Cathedral built in
1710 and the Troitsky Monastery with its late-17th century refectory
halls are splendid examples of old Russian architecture that add to
the beauty of the Kremlin complex, which has become an open-air
museum. The Kremlin’s 80-m-high bell tower ornamented on top with old
chiming tower clocks nearly 3 m in diameter will amaze you with its
grandeur and beauty.
With the annexation of Astrakhan Territory, Russia gained an outlet
to the Caspian Sea for trade with eastern countries. Beginning in the
17th century, Astrakhan won an international reputation as a supplier
of prized fish products, such as black caviar and various kinds of
sturgeon.
Astrakhan acquired the status of a provincial city in 1717; and Peter
the Great established a naval fleet, shipyards, and a port to expand
the Great Volga trade route when he visited Astrakhan in 1722. This
had considerable influence on the city’s subsequent development, and
it became one of the main seaports and shipbuilding centers of
southern Russia.
The names of the best Russian architects of the 18th and 19th
centuries are associated with the Venice of the Volga, and it is not
by chance that Astrakhan is numbered among Russia’s most historically
important cities. The Astrakhan Historical Museum founded in 1837 is
housed in a building constructed in 1911 right in the city center.
Its huge collection of 400 000 items includes unique archeological
and numismatic collections, a rare set of Russian porcelain and
glass, and the Gold Storeroom, where gold and silver jewelry and
weapons of the Scythian and Sarmatian periods (1st millennium B.C.)
are exhibited. Another rare exhibit is the skeleton of a mammoth
three m high with tusks more than five m long, which inhabited the
Lower Volga more than 100 000 years ago. The museum’s collection of
the flora and fauna of Astrakhan Territory is also of continuing
interest.
Despite its long and turbulent history, Astrakhan has retained its
distinctiveness. As in the past, the 16th century Kremlin in the city
center defines its appearance. It long ago became the symbol of
Astrakhan, from which the old streets and quarters of the city opened
out like a fan. The Volga River as a symbol of Russia and its
greatest transport corridor and cultural axis uniting different
peoples and cultures is also part of the Astrakhan lands.
RESOURCES
Astrakhan Region is rightly considered the pearl of the Caspian. Due
to its location in the delta of the Volga River, which flows for more
than 400 km through the region, the territory has an abundance of
water resources. The Caspian Sea and the great Volga are its greatest
assets. Water occupies about 10% of the region; there are nearly 900
rivers in the Volga delta, the deepest being the Bakhtemir, Staraya
Volga, Kizan, Bolda, and Kigach rivers. The region also has no equal
in the world in its abundance and variety of valuable fish species.
Fish are the region’s main resource base: more than 70 species of
fish are found in the Volga and Caspian Sea alone, including a unique
shoal of sturgeon varieties (Russian sturgeon, beluga, and stellate
sturgeon). Most of the black caviar and sturgeon supplied to the
world market comes from Astrakhan Region. Eight fish hatcheries in
the region breed sturgeon and salmon and more than 25 million young
bream and sazan [a member of the carp family] are raised annually.
Astrakhan is a territory of numerous islands, steppes, and a large
number of salt lakes. Sagebrush-saltwort deserts and dry
(desertified) steppes divided by a wide belt of meadows and shrubs
along the main channels of the Volga occupy about 70% of the region.
There are also more than 700 salt lakes and 1300 salt marshes, many
with huge salt reserves. The largest lake is Lake Baskunchak, which
has an area of 115 km2. The Baskunchakskoe deposit produces nearly
80% of all the salt in Russia, and production of bromine salts from
the deposit is currently being set up. The huge lake in the hot
desert and the solitary mountain has attracted people since ancient
times, and figured in many legends and tales of the early nomads.
Soils in the region vary from light chestnut soil in northern
districts, brown semidesert soils in more southerly districts, and
floodplain soils in the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain and the Volga delta.
Alkali and saline soils are found among all types.
Astrakhan Region is the only place in Russia where the vegetation
ranges from shoreline to desert plants. It includes fodder,
industrial, food, and medicinal plants. The combination of these
varieties has created unique plant communities in which 750-850
species of higher plants and more than 700 species of lower plants
such as algae have been identified. More than 400 species of vascular
plants are found in the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain and the Volga delta.
These mainly belong to six families, which make up half the flora of
the Volga delta. Certain rare species are also encountered, including
20 that are vanishing from the region like the dwarf iris, water
chestnut, and sacred lotus. Occurrences of rare ferns are of special
interest.
Forests cover only slightly more than 1% of Astrakhan Region. Typical
species include hardwoods (oak, ash, and elm), softwoods (willow,
poplar), and shrubs (rose willow, oleaster). The forests protect
water bodies in the region and are a favorite place for recreation.
The wildlife of this beautiful territory is rich and surprising.
Slow-moving camels and swift saigas [an Asian antelope] graze on the
boundless steppes, and whole rookeries of Caspian seals can be seen
on the icefields of the Northern Caspian. Wild boars, raccoon dogs,
and ermines inhabit the forests of the Lower Volga; and beavers,
muskrats, and otters live along the numerous rivers and canals.
Nearly 2000 species of insects have been counted. The Lower Volga and
its delta are among the world’s richest bird habitats and nesting
sites. More than 200 bird species have been recorded here, of which
60 are permanent residents and 23 are listed in the Red Book.
Waterfowl hunting is popular in the region. The region’s wildlife, as
a valuable asset, is under government protection.
Astrakhan Region is distinguished by its rich natural resources,
which include a large number of important economic minerals such as
oil, gas, sulfur, salt, bromine, and iodine. The region’s oil fields
are the second largest in European Russia in terms of reserves; and
the Astrakhan gas condensate field, with its deep gas reservoirs and
high hydrogen sulfide content, is considered to be the largest in
Europe. The region also has the necessary raw material base for
producing building materials. For example, cement materials such as
argillaceous chalk, marl, and limestone are found on the
Baskunchak-Kharabali Plain. Deposits of building sand and sandstone
have also been found in the region, and deposits of brick earth and
glass sand are being worked. Large deposits of gypsum, clay-gypsum,
mineral pigments, and gaize [a fine-grained sandstone] are being
explored and developed.
Conditions in Astrakhan Region are favorable for the development of
recreation and health centers for the population. Mineral waters and
the therapeutic sulfurous silty muds of Astrakhan Region’s mineral
lakes form the basis of the region’s recreational resources. One of
the best known lakes is Lake Tinaki located 30 km from Astrakhan. Its
brines have sulfide-chloride and sodium-magnesium contents of 127 to
310 g/l. The lake has an area of 90 km2 and has 23 000 tons of usable
mud reserves. Tinakskaya mineral water is also produced here.
The region has many historical monuments and unique nature preserves
with organized tours.
ECONOMY
Astrakhan Region is part of the Volga economic district. The region’s
favorable geographical location has had a strong influence on its
economic development. The Volga River is a major artery for water
routes from countries on the Caspian Sea to the Black, Mediterranean,
Baltic, and North seas. Astrakhan is a natural through trade center
and important transportation hub at the meeting place of Europe and
Asia with their profitable transportation routes. An international
airport has been opened and airplanes now fly to almost everywhere in
the world. An international seaport that will be Russia’s
second-largest port in terms of size and traffic is under
construction. Despite the political and economic crises that followed
the collapse of the Soviet Union, Astrakhan Region made a successful
recovery and is now one of Russia’s most upcoming regions.
A diversified structure and high potential characterize the region’s
industry. The region has abundant natural resources that include
fish, minerals, land, oil, gas, and gas condensate. There are five
oil and gas fields and one high-sulfur gas condensate field. Experts
estimate that the gas condensate field alone has enough reserves for
many centuries; there are currently 80 producing wells and a stock of
130 operating wells. In addition, five gas pretreatment units have
been put into operation. According to existing data, Astrakhan’s oil
fields are approximately the fifth largest in the world.
Production of economic minerals is the basis of the regional economy.
Other sectors such as the fish processing, food, light, chemical, and
engineering industries and water transport are actively developing.
Production of stable gas condensate ensures fuel self-sufficiency.
Furthermore, over the past ten years the share of the fuel and energy
sector in the regional economy has been increasing, and considering
the prospects for development, this trend is expected to continue.
The fishing industry is one of the oldest industries in Astrakhan
Region. Fish canning plants and fish processing factory ships process
the catch.
The engineering industry mainly specializes in ship building and
repair for the fishing industry, metal-cutting machinery,
compressors, and a variety of other devices and equipment.
Economic development is impossible if the region cannot attract
investments; therefore, the government of Astrakhan Region is
implementing measures aimed at creating the conditions for active
capital investment, as well as creating a legislative basis to
protect invested funds.
The efforts of the Astrakhan City Administration and City Council to
stabilize the city’s socioeconomic development are producing results.
For example, an upward trend has been noted in the fuel and energy
complex and operation of the food and construction industries has
stabilized. Moreover, in the last few years, Astrakhan Region has led
the country in housing construction growth rates. Foreign investors
from Bulgaria have participated in solving this problem.
The banking sector and financial institutions are expanding, and
currency and share markets have started operating. Twenty-six banks
and branches of other Russian banks operate in Astrakhan, and
favorable conditions for investors are being created.
The region’s first financial and industrial group, Astrakhan
Shipbuilder (FPG Astrakhansky korabel), has been set up and includes
large shipbuilding companies, the Volga-Caspian Joint Stock Bank
(Volgo-Kaspiysky AB), and investment and finance companies.
The Astrakhan Chamber of Commerce and Industry represents the
interests of the business community and its associations. It takes an
active part in ensuring effective cooperation between businessmen and
government agencies, defends the interests of the region’s
businesses, and participates in business development programs. The
Chamber unites more than 100 companies, organizations, firms, banks,
unions, and associations in the region and acts in accordance with
the Law of the Russian Federation “On Chambers of Commerce and
Industry in the Russian Federation.”
The companies and organizations of Astrakhan and Astrakhan Region
have noticeably expanded the scope of their export-import operations
in recent years. Once they have incorporated, enterprises actively
search for new sales markets for their products and find reliable
customers, including foreign customers.
The Astrakhan Paint Factory (Astrakhansky lakokrasochny zavod) was
one of the finalists in the All-Russian competition “The 100 Best
Goods in Russia.” This once again confirms the stability of a company
that even in 1995 had acquired the name of “Russian Economic Leader”
and become one of the country’s 5000 leading companies. Its products,
which include varnish, paint, household chemical goods, and packaging
paper, long ago found their market niche for goods produced by
domestic industry.
Salt has been produced at Lake Baskunchak for nearly 150 years. The
largest producer of salt for industry and agriculture today is AO
Bassol.
Astrakhan shipbuilders have been working with various European firms
for five years. Astrakhan’s AO 3rd International Shipyard (
Astrakhansky sudostroitelny zavod im. III Internatsionala) has
received a lucrative order from Holland for the construction of three
dry cargo ships. The Astrakhan Shipbuilder financial and industrial
group has concluded another contract for the construction of three
sea-going dry cargo ships for Hungary. The general contractor is AO
Marine Shipbuilding Yard (Morskoi sudostroitelny zavod).
The management of AO Astrakhan Glass Fiber (Astrakhanskoe
steklovolokno) worked successfully with a Czech firm to deliver its
products and has now concluded a profitable contract with the
Romanian firm Stizomat to supply fiberglass thread and glass fiber.
The city is pinning great hopes on partnerships. Two agreements have
been concluded with twin cities in America and the cities of
Ljubljana (Slovenia) and Ruse (Bulgaria). Astrakhan also has close
ties with neighboring Russian cities such as Rostov-on-Don, Saratov,
Stavropol, and Volgograd.
AUTHORITIES
The Administration of Astrakhan Region headed by the Governor is the
highest executive body. The Governor is Astrakhan Region’s highest
official.
The executive branch of the government develops and implements
* financial and investment policy in Astrakhan Region;
* government measures to develop the social sphere, improve the
well-being of the population, and protect the work and health of
the people.
It also adopts measures to
* uphold the law and protect the rights and freedoms of the
citizens of Astrakhan Region;
* develop entrepreneurship and restrict monopolistic activity.
District and city administrations and the regional Administration
exercise executive authority in the region.
The Astrakhan Regional Representative Assembly in the highest
legislative body.
The Astrakhan Regional Court, district (city) courts, and the
Arbitration Court of Astrakhan Region exercise judicial authority in
Astrakhan Region.
CULTURE AND ART
Astrakhan Region is considered the industrial center of the Lower
Volga, but it is also the home of many leading cultural and artistic
figures. Cultural points of interest include theaters, a
conservatory, a philharmonic, a combined historical and architectural
museum preserve, the Kustodiev Art Gallery, a large number of
museums, and of course the Kremlin.
The Kustodiev Gallery founded in 1918 is the pride of Astrakhan. Its
exhibits include paintings by Boris Kustodiev himself and other
masters of Russian painting. History lovers will be interested in
visiting the Kremlin, which houses exhibits of the Astrakhan Museum
of History and Architecture. Its collection includes more than 250
000 items that reflect the rich history of the Lower Volga from
Mesolithic times to the present. Numerous art schools, the Vlasov Art
College, and cultural institutions train professionals in eight
different cultural specialties. The teaching staff includes many
honored cultural workers and artists.
The Valeriya Barsova and Mariya Maksakova festivals that attract both
Russian and foreign performers are held in Astrakhan.
The Mussorgsky Music School (the oldest music school in the Volga
region), the Astrakhan Conservatory, the Astrakhan Regional
Philharmonic, and a new music theater preserve and advance
Astrakhan’s rich musical culture.
Astrakhan is also the home of many famous talented Russians,
including film producer Vladimir Menshov [best known for the film
Moscow Doesn’t Believe in Tears], actor Vladimir Steklov, pop singer
Igor Nadzhiev, and poet Velimir Khlebnikov.
The works of Khlebnikov, who loved the broad expanses of the Volga
River and the beauty of the Caspian Sea, are filled with love for the
people. He said, “One of the secrets of creative work is to visualize
the people you are writing for and find words in the center of life
of these people.”
Official site of the Administration of Astrakhan Region:
© 1991-2006 ZAO “Kommersant. Publishing House”.
–Boundary_(ID_WdC2muKjUbF6TNv+ckWi5 g)–
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress