Turkey vainly seeking more important regional role – Alek Yenigomshy

Turkey vainly seeking more important regional role – Alek Yenigomshyan

14:44 ¢ 15.12.13

By using the term `deportation’ Turkey is trying to pre-empt any blows
on it as the centennial of the Armenian Genocide is nearing.

At the same time, official Ankara is thus trying to make its role is
the region acceptable, ASALA ex-member and Preparliament member Alek
Yenigomshyan told Tert.am as he commented on Turkish FM Ahmet
DavutoÄ?lu’s visit to Armenia and his follow-up statement, when he used
the term `deportation,’ noting that was an inhuman act never supported
by Turkey.

According to Yenigomshyan, it is not the first time that Turkish
authorities have used the term `deportation.’

`They admit that Armenians were `deported’ rather than fell victim to
genocide for, as they claim, being treacherous. By using this term,
they are not doing anything new. They are only `adding’ the shade of
`inhuman.’ However, it does not imply any political responsibility for
Ottoman Turkey’s actions. In a narrower sense, it may be considered a
qualitative change, but in a broader sense, no essential changes have
taken place.’

The Turkish FM’s visit to Turkey was not a coincidence. It is related
to new regional developments.

`The visit should be viewed in the context of new programs and of
Turkey’s increasing role. In this new geopolitical situation Turkey is
implementing a deceptive policy,’ he said.

`The policy Turkey pursued in 2008 and 2009 produced no results. So
they are now trying to add some shades to the delicate issues related
to the Armenian people. This approach should be viewed in the context
of their psychological policy,’ Yenigomshyan said.

However, Turkey’s policy has failed.

`As to how long this policy will go on failing, it depends on the
Armenian people’s strong will. A failure may turn into a lucky one if
the opponent, Armenia, implement an even more ineffective policy. The
Armenian people must remain strong,’ Yenigomshyan concluded.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2013/12/15/aleq-yenigomshyan/

Yerevan Djur va construire 30 nouvelles stations de pompage d’appoin

ARMENIE
Yerevan Djur va construire 30 nouvelles stations de pompage d’appoint
dans les 3 prochaines années

L’entreprise Yerevan Djur prévoit d’installer environ 30 nouvelles
stations de pompage d’appoint dans les trois prochaines années a
annoncé le secrétaire de presse de la société Murad Sarkissian.

Les fonds seront disponibles en 2014, mais d’ores et déjà la société
fait les plans a dit Murad Sarkissian sans mentionner le volume réel
du financement.

Les nouvelles stations de pompage d’appoint permettront d’assurer
l’approvisionnement 24 heures sur 24 à plusieurs centaines de blocs
d’appartements dans la capitale, a-t-il dit.

L’attaché de presse a également déclaré quelque 220 conduites
devraient être reconstruits entre 2014 et 2016.

« Nous prévoyons également d’installer environ 39000 mètres de haute
qualité dans des maisons privées à nos frais », a déclaré Murad
Sarkissian. Cela permettra de réduire les pertes d’eau de 50% et le
nombre de pannes de 80%, a-t-il ajouté.

Murad Sarkissian a dit que les travaux de grande envergure sont
prévues pour être réalisées dans la capitale au cours des trois
prochaines années afin d’améliorer le système d’approvisionnement en
eau d’Erevan, y compris le remplacement et la réparation de conduites
et l’augmentation des heures d’approvisionnement.

Tous ces travaux seront pris en charge à partir de deux prêts – l’un
d’eux prolongé par la Banque européenne pour la reconstruction et le
développement (BERD) et l’autre par la Banque européenne
d’investissement (BEI), ainsi que des subventions accordées par l’UE.
Le montant total des fonds fournit à la société est de 21 millions de
dollars.

dimanche 15 décembre 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Le lancement de vols entre Erevan et Astana va donner un coup de pou

ARMENIE
Le lancement de vols entre Erevan et Astana va donner un coup de pouce
aux relations d’affaires entre l’Arménie et le Kazakhstan

Le lancement de vols aériens directs entre Erevan et Astana la
capitale kazakh va donner une impulsion aux relations d’affaires entre
l’Arménie et le Kazakhstan a déclaré le Premier ministre kazakh Serik
Akhmedov lors d’une rencontre avec son homologue arménien Tigran
Sarkissian.

Le service de presse du gouvernement arménien a déclaré que les deux
hommes ont discuté des perspectives des relations arméno-kazakhs, un
large éventail d’autres questions ainsi que de l’adhésion prochaine de
l’Arménie à l’Union douanière.

dimanche 15 décembre 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Des manifestants habillés en Père Noël dans les rues d’Erévan contre

ARMENIE-SOCIAL
Des manifestants habillés en Père Noël dans les rues d’Erévan contre
la nouvelle loi sur le régime des retraites en Arménie

Des manifestants qui protestaient contre le projet de loi pour mise en
place d’une loi sur les retraites complémentaires de 5% retenues sur
les salaires, sont descendus en tenues de Père Noël dans le centre
d’Erévan, près de la Place de la République hier. Les manifestants ont
distribué aux passants des tracts qui expliquaient qu’ils étaient
opposés à ce régime de retenue sur les salaires pour les retraites,
qui allait faire l’objet d’une loi. Ils annonçaient également la tenue
d’une grande manifestation publique le 17 décembre.

« Nous sommes venus de la lointaine Laponie afin d’aider nos camarades
qui luttent contre la nouvelle loi sur les retraites. Nous sommes ici
pour distribuer des friandises aux enfants et des tracts aux parents
sur lequel nous dénonçons cette loi » a affirmé l’un des manifestants
à la presse. Rappelons que le 1er janvier 2014 entrera en action une
loi qui prévoit la retenue obligatoire d’une cotisation de 5% sur les
salaires des personnes nées à partir de 1974 afin d’alimenter une
caisse de retraite complémentaire.Photos News.am

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 15 décembre 2013,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=95660

Fourteenth EU-Armenia Cooperation Council Held In Brussels

RTT News (United States)
December 9, 2013 Monday

Fourteenth EU-Armenia Cooperation Council Held In Brussels

(RTTNews) – The fourteenth meeting of the Cooperation Council between
the European Union (EU) and the Republic of Armenia was held in
Brussels on Monday, according to an EU press release.

The European bloc was represented at the meeting by Linas Linkevicius,
the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Lithuania, Head of the European
Union delegation on behalf of the High Representative of the Union for
Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Catherine Ashton, and Stefan
Fule, Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighborhood Policy.

The Armenian delegation was led by Edward Nalbandian, Minister of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia as well as the acting as
Chair of the Cooperation Council this year.

The “meeting took place in a sensitive year for bilateral relations,
marked by Armenia’s decision to join the Customs Union and to
participate in the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union which is
not compatible with the Association Agreement, including a Deep and
Comprehensive Free Trade Area, as negotiated with the EU,” the press
release read.

It said both sides reviewed their intensive activities and meetings
held in the overall Eastern Partnership framework, culminating with
the Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius. They also discussed the
further implementation of the objectives of the Eastern Partnership
defined in the Prague, Warsaw and Vilnius Declarations.

The two sides also confirmed the need to revisit the basis for their
bilateral relations, as well as to update the EU-Armenia ENP Action
Plan accordingly in order to serve as a stepping-stone for their
future cooperation.

“This year’s meeting was an appropriate occasion to follow-up to the
EU-Armenia Joint Statement issued in Vilnius, as agreed between the
High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security
Policy and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia,” the press
release said.

It added that the EU took note “of progress in reforms and Armenia’s
commitment to continue on this positive path, but at the same time
encouraged acceleration in specific areas, notably democracy and the
rule of law, anti-corruption, human rights and fundamental freedoms,
and judicial reform.”

The European bloc also urged Armenia to resolve its territorial
dispute with Azerbaijan over the Nagorno-Karabakh region.

Davutoglu had not come to solve an issue; he was not the right perso

Sociologist. `DavutoÄ?lu had not come to solve an issue; he was not the
right person.’

December 14 2013

`Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu’s visit was not just a visit, it tries to confirm
that Turkey, in all cases, is interested in regional issues, and they
had already state in advance that Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan have
common projects, and, if the time comes, they can implement them,
here, there was no reaction to the statement’, ` said the sociologist
Aharon Adibekyan, in the conversation with Aravot.am, commenting on
Turkish Foreign Affairs Minister Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu’s visit. Aharon
Adibekyan opines that Turkey was expecting us to meet him rejoiced. He
is convinced, `It was very good that we met his quite restrained, and
it is bad that the protest was held, due to which we raised their
ratings.’ Aharon Adibekyan finds that Turkey reaffirmed that it has
interests in the region and is ready to make similar steps, and a
country that actually keeps in blockade, its Foreign Affairs Minister
attends a meeting there. `We reaffirmed our readiness to accept the
Turkish politician in such a level, because it was a fact that he has
having some interests in the region and is ready to make various
steps. He had not come here to negotiate, solve problem, and he is not
the right person to take such steps, his arrival was agreed with
ErdoÄ?an, consequently, all the steps and negotiations should be held
with ErdoÄ?an, while he is only the person executing ErdoÄ?an’s adopted
decisions.’

Eva HAKOBYAN

Read more at:

http://en.aravot.am/2013/12/14/162994/

BAKU: U.S State Department: Resolution Of Protracted Conflicts Shoul

U.S STATE DEPARTMENT: RESOLUTION OF PROTRACTED CONFLICTS SHOULD REMAIN HIGH ON OSCE’S AGENDA

Trend, Azerbaijan
Dec 13 2013

By Elmira Tariverdiyeva – Trend:

Concrete and tangible steps in the resolution of protracted conflicts
should remain high on the OSCE’s agenda. The Organization should
continue to play a role in addressing the protracted conflicts in
the OSCE space, the U.S State Department said today.

The foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan met in Kyiv to
continue dialogue on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict; their joint
statement with the U.S., Russian, and French heads of delegation,
which was endorsed by the OSCE Ministerial Council, is an encouraging
sign of our shared commitment to making progress toward a peaceful
settlement, according to the statement.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 per cent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, Russia, France and the U.S. are
currently holding peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

What Will The Armenian Genocide Centennial Accomplish?

WHAT WILL THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE CENTENNIAL ACCOMPLISH?

Friday, December 13th, 2013

Orobik Eminian, 98, who was the only member of her family to escape the
Armenian Genocide alive, joins in commemorating the 95th anniversary
of the genocide and in calling for its recognition in New York City,
April 25, 2010. (Photo: REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi)

BY HRANT APOVIAN

“Reconciliation means working together to correct the legacy of
past injustice.”

-Nelson Mandela, December 16, 1995

The leader of the association of Turkish Jews in Israel, Zali de
Toledo, stated that “Turkey should take into account its interests
and should normalize relations with Israel or else the Israeli lobby
will likely stay neutral when 2015 comes.” This proves that nothing
has changed. The world is oblivious to morality and the reality of the
Armenian Genocide is no more than a bargaining chip for some nations.

We are anxiously waiting, with the greatest dread and anticipation,
for the year 2015, marking one hundred years of the first genocide
of the twentieth century. Expectations are at an all time high. The
centennial is set to be commemorated in an unprecedented manner.

Finally after ten decades, will the world listen? Will Turkey buckle
under pressure? Will justice – delayed for so long- be finally served?

“I am not an optimist, but a great believer of hope” is a quote
from the great freedom fighter and former president of South Africa,
Nelson Mandela. Similar to Mr. Mandela, this writer is pessimistic
about what change- if any- the centennial will bring. However, this
writer is also hopeful that anticipating the obstacles before us and
being cognizant of certain realities, will help us come out of our
torpor and define new strategies to make an impact, on the occasion
of the commemoration of the horror that befell our grandparents and
that almost annihilated our people. Many areas of concern come to mind.

***

1. Are we ready to shake public consciousness?

That which has taken many years of sacrifice and years of struggle,
has been successful in enlisting over twenty countries to officially
recognize the Armenian Genocide. A short-lived outburst of armed
aggression against Turkish interests and diplomats has been successful
in bringing the Genocide to the forefront. However, the mere fact
that it is the centennial of the Armenian Genocide will not in itself
bring the issue to a head and force nations to forgo their interests
and pursue what is morally right. How can we expect to elevate public
awareness when the world stood silent during other genocides that
occurred in the latter part of the twentieth century? Bangladesh,
Rwanda, Sudan all happened in our lifetime. We need to elevate the
level of our expectations: we need to invite world leaders to publicly
chastise Turkey for its conduct; the Vatican should erect a memorial
for the million and a half; the European Union should stop talks for
Turkey’s admission to its ranks; and the halls of Congress should
reverberate with our demands.

2. Are we over-anticipating the potential accomplishments during
the centennial?

The results will be directly commensurate to the magnitude of our
efforts. The biggest risk and fear is falling short of making enough of
an impact to result in serious changes. We need to change our outlook
in how we approach this anniversary: no more speeches, no more marches,
no vigils, no church services, no demonstrations. We have been there,
done that. We need the Government in Armenia to take the lead,
Armenian political parties to stop their bickering and activate
their members, attorneys to go to high courts around the world,
and the United Nations to act. The time to commemorate has long passed.

3. Are we ready for the Turkish onslaught?

We have always underestimated those that committed the genocide. I
suspect that Turkey has its own counter offensive planned. All of its
“friends” around the world, and the millions spent on its arsenal
of public relation firms may overcome our meager preparations. We
may not be ready for what Turkey has in store to neutralize what our
various commemoration committees are planning. We need to be ready
to confront a heightened and more sophisticated level of denial.

4. Is it going to be a replay on a grander scale of a hundred years
of commemorative rites?

In this age of globalization, social media and communication advances,
it is my sincere hope that our commemoration committees will adopt
new methods of challenging Turkish interests worldwide. I urge that
they commit to adopting and preparing a propaganda blitz that will
expose Turkey for what it is: a failed state based on lies, including
a failed “zero problems” policy with its neighbors, a nation that
disregards human rights, harbors Al-Qaida affiliates on its soil
and that has committed genocide not only on Armenians, but Greeks,
Arabs, Poles and Kurds. Turkey’s continued blockade of Armenia should
no longer be tolerated by its NATO allies. Our offensive should be
brutal. We have to enlist the help of all countries and organizations
that espouse human rights and will not succumb to Turkish threats.

5. Have we really passed the threshold from genocide recognition
attempts, to the legal challenges of seeking compensation and redress
from the Turkish Government?

As it stands, we have just begun to tackle legal challenges. We
have yet to do our homework on this and we need to raise the immense
financial resources that it would require. It is yet to be seen whether
the government in Armenia is ready to drop the medicine pill that it
was forced to swallow- the protocols- and to take the lead in bringing
our claims to world organizations, starting with the United Nations
and the European Union. Turkey has to face the fact that massacring
the inhabitants of the land does not absolve it from their descendants’
territorial claims.

6. Finally, what has changed in the equation after so many years
of struggle?

It is true that a lot has changed in ten decades. Hopefully,
Armenians are wiser and better equipped to wage war against a nation
that never seized to dream of its Pan-Turkic aspirations. Armenia is
a free country again. Most nations are aware that Turkey committed
the first genocide of the twentieth century. Even some intellectuals
within Turkey have begun to talk freely about that which was taboo
for decades. The many years of a struggle to bring down the wall of
silence have not been in vain. The next stage will require even more
vigilance from all of us.

***

One nation committed mass genocide. It has to come to terms with its
crime, pay its respects to the dead, return historic Armenian lands,
pay compensation and apologize to the civilized world.

One nation’s survivors have truth on their side. They have a
just cause. Their sons and daughters must pull together and shake
the world with their demands. Time has run out for justice to be
served. Let the Jewish Lobby side with Turkey when 2015 comes. This
is our responsibility.

http://asbarez.com/117406/what-will-the-armenian-genocide-centennial-accomplish/

The Woman In The Wall: A Story Of People, Places, And Things

THE WOMAN IN THE WALL: A STORY OF PEOPLE, PLACES, AND THINGS

By Vahe Habeshian // December 11, 2013

Special to the Armenian Weekly

In 2005, a Turkish workman named Murat finds a dusty postcard hidden
behind the wooden panels of a wall in an old house in south-central
Turkey, in the city of Antep (Gaziantep).

Image of the postcard found in the wall of an Armenian home in Ayntap:
Heghine, the widow of Kevork Chavoush, with Mauser handgun in her right
hand and a shortened-barrel (or stage prop) Mosin rifle in her left

On the front of the postcard is the black-and-white image of a woman
in a long black dress; she’s holding a handgun in her right hand
and a rifle in her left. Bandoliers are wrapped across her chest
and around her waist. Nearly lost among the bullets and leather is
a round brooch or medallion above her left breast.

In English, at bottom-left, is an embossed signature, “M. H.

Halladjian,” and at bottom-right is a place name, “Aintab Asia-Minor.”

On the back of the postcard is handwriting in a language that’s alien
to Murat; only a part of a date is comprehensible: 1910.

* * *

Halfway through the first week of a draining two-week “pilgrimage”
through historic Armenia, on May 26, 2013, our group of 12
Armenian “pilgrims” arrives in Antep (Ayntap, or Aintab, in
Armenian). Our guide, Armen Aroyan, explains that the city was renamed
Gaziantep–“Heroic Antep”–for having repulsed British and French
armed forces in 1921, during the war of “liberation” that resulted
in the founding of the Republic of Turkey in 1923.

As we drive through the city, it seems vaguely familiar, though I’ve
never been here before. I can see parts of Beirut and Aleppo in both
the old and the new buildings, the dusty cobblestoned streets, the
small shops lining them.

Our van pulls up to an imposing structure overlooking a main street.

It’s the Sourp Asdvadzadzin (“Holy Mother of God”) Church, built
in 1892, now converted to a mosque and renamed KurtuluÅ~_ Camii
(“Liberation” mosque), Armen explains. After the long drive from Musa
Dagh in our brand new Mercedes passenger van, we gladly begin to exit.

My son, Garin Shant, my youngest, bounds out like a falcon fleeing a
gilded cage; others, including my father, move out wearily, stretching
old muscles that have grown accustomed to the inertia of sitting and
waiting. All of us gradually make our way up, toward the church-mosque.

Using a magnifying glass, one is able to almost fully make out
Heghine’s medallion/brooch, of a coat of arms consisting of a banner,
on top of which are assembled a sword, feather pen, and spade, and
three Armenian initials below them: Õ~@ Õ… Ô´. (A.R.F.)

The wooden doors on the side of the building, facing us, are locked.

The members of the group move on in various directions around the
building, taking pictures. I walk to the “front” of the church-mosque,
toward a wide walkway/courtyard overlooking the street; I’m actually
at the back of the church, behind the altar, I find out later. Leaning
against the railing I look over the edge. Across the street, I can
see half-standing ruins of large houses with red clay roof tiles,
and I notice a small, cross-shaped opening or window–then another.

Considering their proximity to the church, and their grand size,
they must be formerly Armenian-owned homes, I think to myself. I take
pictures of them with my iPhone, knowing full well that I am too far
to be able to capture the images of the windows.

I hear, then see, a small old man off to the side, behind me, sweeping
the ground. His faded, oft-torn and oft-mended clothes hang loosely
on his small frame; his shoes, too, are worn. For a split second I
think he’s wearing a shalvar and pabuches.

He sweeps seemingly in slow motion, in half-hearted, incomplete
strokes; just as likely, he’s simply too old, his range of motion
limited, his limbs atrophied and no longer limber. I greet him with my
nearly nonexistent Turkish and try to ask whether the mosque is open.

He motions that I follow… He’s dealt with tourists before. I follow.

His pace is maddeningly slow. He doesn’t walk. He shuffles. Haltingly.

I slow my pace to match his; he has the key, after all. And I don’t
want to be rude, to imply with eager steps that he should walk more
quickly. But I’m restless–have been for the entire trip so far–as if
wanting to quickly reach the next place, then the next and the next,
but also wanting to stay, absorb the essence of each site, to feel
a part of it. Yet I can do neither.

Eventually, the old man reaches the wooden doors, in the meantime
having built a small following of pilgrims curious to see what lies
within the church-mosque. The doors creak and slowly swing open. The
old man steps in, takes off his dusty shoes, and places them on a
rack. We follow him in and take off our shoes, too.

Hand-written Armenian text behind the postcard discovered in the wall
of an Armenian home in Ayntap

We make our way around a partition to enter the church-mosque proper
and are immediately confronted by the overwhelming red of an overly
large Turkish flag dominating the wall in front of us, the only thing
of color in relatively stark surroundings, though the interior of the
church is beautiful. The oriental carpet beneath our stockinged feet
makes the space seem tolerable, hospitable.

I immediately begin to walk along the walls, looking up and down for a
remnant of anything Armenian, as I’ve done throughout the trip. (And,
if I’m to be honest, as I’ve done all my life, pretty much everywhere
I go. I suppose that’s what happens when one’s sense of home feels
fragile and hazy.)

I find nothing on the cold walls of the church-mosque. Until I look up,
high above what used to be the altar, above yet another large Turkish
flag, and notice a medallion-shaped…something. The abandoned altar
is too dark, and I can’t tell what the shape contains because what had
once been there has eroded with time, or it has been intentionally
chipped away. It’s even possible that it had contained nothing in
particular, I think, then quickly dismiss it.

I take a few pictures, again knowing that I likely wouldn’t be able
to capture a clear-enough image of what had once been there. Only
after I place the iPhone in my pocket does the thought occur to
me: Many Armenian churches have the figure of a dove or the letter
“Ô·” above the altar–signifying, respectively, the Holy Spirit and
God. Whichever had been there, the presence of neither seems very
apparent now in the church-mosque.

Murad, who discovered the postcard of Kevork Chavoush’s widow and
subsequently translated Ayntapi Goyamarde from Armenian to Turkish

Normally, I wouldn’t feel great affinity toward a religious
symbol–Christian, Armenian, or otherwise. But in its current, altered
state, that empty medallion shape elicits…what? Resentment? Loss?

Anger? Frustration? Sorrow? Those and much more that I cannot name,
or probably even comprehend.

No wonder ancient (and not so ancient) cultures have assigned and
ascribed so much power to symbols, amulets, and other talismanic
objects, believing they hold power in, and influence over, the
physical world.

They affect thought. And so they effect change.

In this case, it is the absence of an object–rather, the existence
of a mere hint of it–that casts a powerful presence, substantiating
what I sense and feel and know: that this building is not now what
it once was, that what it is now isn’t really what it is, or is made
to seem to be.

Every molecule of every remaining inanimate object of Historic
Armenia is a microcosm of immense loss, massive erasure, and a brutal
re-rendering of reality.

* * *

A stranger has joined us in the church-mosque. Armen introduces a few
of us to an Antep native, Murad, a tall, thin, mustachioed Turk with
dark hair tied back into a ponytail. He seems at once laid back and
intense–the type who subsists on coffee and cigarettes. Apparently
he and Armen are old friends. They do some catching up, discussing
pictures of old Armenian homes that Murad has recently emailed
to Armen.

At some point, standing in the middle of the church-mosque, Murad
takes out some papers from his bag. A few of us gather around as
he explains, in English, about a project he’s been working on. The
papers are photocopied pages of an Armenian book, Ayntapi Goyamarde
(“Ayntap’s Battle for Survival”) about the Armenian battles of
self-defense against Turkish attacks in 1920-21. The author is A.

Kesar, and the book was published in 1945, in Boston, by the Hairenik
Press. I was once an editor at the Hairenik, I point out, surprised,
never imagining that I would come across anything in the middle of
Ayntap that would remind me of my long years in the Hairenik building
in Watertown, Mass.

The Sourp Asdvadzadzin Church of Aintab, now converted to a mosque,
KurtuluÅ~_ Camii

The cover page has notes in Turkish and English scribbled over and
around the title. Murad flips through some pages, and we see how nearly
every millimeter of white space between the lines of printed Armenian
text contains handwritten Turkish. Murad explains that he has taught
himself the Armenian alphabet, and with the help of dictionaries he’s
been translating the Armenian text into Turkish so that he may learn
the untaught history of his hometown.

I’m incredulous: Really? Why? How? A Turk learning Armenian so that he
could translate the Armenian view of events in his “heroic” hometown
nearly a century earlier?

The setting–an Armenian church seized and converted into a Turkish
mosque and ironically renamed “liberation”–makes the proposition seem
even more surreal: A Turk who is, in essence, “converting” Armenian
text into Turkish. But now the intent is to reveal, not obscure,
to reclaim, to name things as they are. To liberate.

Murad, an electrical engineer by training, tells us some of the
back-story. The following is the version he emailed to me a couple
of months after we’d met:

“Once upon a time I was a house restorer. At that time, I did not
have sufficient information about the original (Armenian) owner of
the buildings. I’d only have information on the owners after 1923,
when the Turkish Republic was declared. During the restoration of
an old house in the Kayajik region [of Antep], we had to restore
some wooden parts of the house. The house had seven rooms and a big
living room. I started to work in a small room on the first floor of
the house. The architectural style of that room was that all of the
walls were covered with wood, but unfortunately most of the wood was
destroyed by the effect of humidity. For this reason, we decided to
renovate all the wooden parts of this room. But we had to be careful
when removing the old wood because the limestone under the wood could
be damaged.

The altar of Sourp Asdvadzadzin Church, Ayntap

“When I started the removing operation, I found a picture between the
limestone of the wall and the wooden part. First, I thought it was an
ordinary paper, but when I looked it carefully I noticed that it is
a photograph covered by dust. When I cleaned the dust, I saw a young
woman with arms [weapons] and I could read, ‘Aintab Asia-Minor’ and
‘M.H. Halladjian.’ I thought most probably M.H.H. was a photographer
and this is a very old photo. When I looked the back side, I could
read only ’21…1910.’

“As you can guess, I could not read the other parts of the writing. I
thought the writing is in the Arabic language because at that time
Ottomans used Arabic letters for writing. When I asked a friend who
knows Arabic, he said, ‘This writing is not Arabic, it could be the
Armenian language.’ Later, I met a family [of Armenians] who visited
Antep, and they translated the writing.

Transliteration (in Western Armenian)

Hankoutsial heros Kevork Chavoushi

Digin ayri Heghine.

=

Mer hishadagi nvere asd[?]

Diar Hovhannes yev

Digin Piranian

21 Houlis 1910 H.H.T.

Aintab

Medallion-shaped architectural molding above the altar of Sourp
Asdvadzadzin Church, Ayntap

The English translation

Deceased hero Kevork Chavoush’s

Wife, the widow Heghine.

=

Our memento this/here[?]

Mr. Hovhannes and

Mrs. Piranian

21 July 1910 A.R.F.

Ayntap

“Before the translation, I had one question: ‘Who was M.H.

Halladjian?’ But after the translation, I had more than five
questions. ‘Who were these women and men?’ Then, I decided to search
for the history of Antep. These [events] happened in 2005.

Kevork Chavoush

“Later, I met with Armen Aroyan, and he gave a Xerox copy of the
book K. Sarafian’s Brief History of Aintab. After reading that book,
I decided to learn the Armenian language, because the history of Antep
can not be researched and understood without the Armenian language.

Now I can read, and with the help of a dictionary I can understand
Armenian.”

* * *

The Murat of 2005 had become the Murad we met in 2013 at the
Sourp Asdvadzadzin Church/Liberation mosque of Ayntap/Aintab,
Antep/Gaziantep. At some point, I find out later from a mutual friend,
he had changed the spelling of his name.

I’m not certain why. But I know it has something to do with people,
places, and things.

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2013/12/11/the-woman-in-the-wall/

168 Zham: $204-Million Gas Debt On Armenian Taxpayers’ Shoulders

168 ZHAM: $204-MILLION GAS DEBT ON ARMENIAN TAXPAYERS’ SHOULDERS

December 07, 2013

YEREVAN. – Energy and Natural Resources Minister Armen Movsisyan had
said that Armenia’s $155-million debt to Russia in terms of natural
gas supply accumulated since 2011, 168 Zham daily reports.

“It became clear that the price of gas has in fact risen [in the
country] since July 2011, but ArmRusGazprom [company ofArmenia]
continued to pay the old price. As a result, about a $300-million debt
accumulated, half of which the Russian side has taken upon itself,
whereasArmenia surrendered [its remaining] 20 percent [of the shares
in] ArmRusGazprom, in lieu of its debt.

“[But], in reality, the debt (around $49 million) which is
accumulated since April 2013 can be considered Armenia’s [debt]
because the Government of Armenia stated that it will subsidize the gas
[price] hike. But nothing has been announced about the debt that was
accumulated from July 2011 to April 2013; this [debt] totals about $204
million, which has remained on the shoulders of the Armenian taxpayers.

“What is more, the creator of this confusion is the Government of
Armenia,” 168 Zham writes.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am