Brucellosis Found In Cattle In Kotayk Region Of Armenia

BRUCELLOSIS FOUND IN CATTLE IN KOTAYK REGION OF ARMENIA

YEREVAN, March 4. /ARKA/. Thirty-eight head were found with brucellosis
in Dzoraghbyur village of Kotayk province, the state food safety
service of Armenia reported referring to survey results.

Diseased animals are currently killed as required by the sanitary
norms, according to the report.

Apart from this, the food safety service requested the ministry of
health to provide laboratory surveillance to people who had close
contact with diseased animals.

Sanitary and anti-epidemic measures are under way.

Human brucellosis cases were recorded in Armenia in winter and
summer 2013.

Brucellosis is a highly contagious zoonosis caused by ingestion of
unsterilized milk or meat from infected animals or close contact
with their secretions. Transmission from human to human is rare but
possible. -0–

– See more at:

http://arka.am/en/news/society/brucellosis_found_in_cattle_in_kotayk_region_of_armenia/#sthash.cZKv4Ygp.dpuf

International Crisis Group Stating The Obvious In Karabakh Report

INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP STATING THE OBVIOUS IN KARABAKH REPORT

March 4, 2014 – 13:44 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – A monthly bulletin by the International Crisis
Group addressed current and potential conflicts around the world,
including situation in Karabakh.

According to the document, the U.S. Co-chair of OSCE Minsk Group
mediating between Azerbaijan and Armenia in media interview early Feb
cited progress in negotiations. Also, the document notes, sporadic
armed clashes across front line which began mid-Jan continued, albeit
less intense, with several reports of troop deaths from “both Yerevan
and Baku.”

Quite predictably, the report of the ICG, which for many years has
been playing at objectivity, failed to mention the actual instigator
of escalations in the Karabakh conflict zone. Traditionally, the ICG
releases reports listing obvious facts, also issuing annual prophesies
of an imminent war in Karabakh.

The Co-chairs (Ambassadors Igor Popov of the Russian Federation,
Jacques Faure of France, and James Warlick of the United
States of America) and the Personal Representative of the OSCE
Chairperson-in-Office, Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk, traveled to Baku
and Yerevan Feb 4-5.

In Baku, the Co-chairs met with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev,
and in Yerevan they met with Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan. In
both capitals, they had consultations with the Ministers of Foreign
Affairs and Defense.

At the meeting with Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian, the Co-chairs
shared impressions of the Baku visit, with the Armenian official
stressing the necessity of preventing Azeri provocations. As he noted,
Yerevan supports the Co-chairs’ stance that escalation of tensions
at the line of contact undermines success of the peace talks.

With the Presidents, the Co-chairs discussed the outcome of the
Foreign Ministers’ recent meeting in Paris, and stressed the need
for further progress on the substance of negotiations on the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict. They emphasized the need to continue negotiations
at the highest level, as was agreed in Vienna.

In their talks, the Co-chairs reiterated their deep concern over the
recent escalation on the Line of Contact and the border, and called
on the sides to exercise restraint in their actions and rhetoric.

In late January, a Nagorno Karabakh army soldier, Karen Galstyan,
aged 20, sustained a deadly injury in a sniper attack at the northern
direction of the line of contact with the Azerbaijani armed forces.

Simultaneous attempts of penetration by the Azerbaijani subversive
groups were recorded on January 19-20 in the north-eastern (Jraberd)
and south-eastern (Korgan) directions of the line of contact . The
front units of the armed forces of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic
noticed the actions of the Azerbaijani subversive groups and started
an organized defense in both directions. The rival was thrown back
suffering palpable human and material losses. Junior Sergeant Armen
Hovhannisyan died from the wounds he received during the exchange of
fire in the north-eastern direction.

Also, as a result of the continuous firing from the Azerbaijani side,
a 16-year-old girl was wounded in her leg on Thursday, Jan 23 night
in Aygepar village of Armenia’s Tavush province. Intensive fire was
registered in the direction of Armenian border villages of Nerkin
Karmraghbyur, Aygepar, Chinari and Movses, RA Defense Ministry
spokesman Artsrun Hovhannisyan told PanARMENIAN.Net

The injured girl underwent a surgery in the hospital of Berd town
and later discharged, according to Ankakh.com.

“The Azeris fired upon houses, roofs. Now the firing has stopped,”
one of Aygepar residents told Razm.info.

According to Nerkin Karmraghbyur’s page on Facebook, the firing ceased
at about 5 am Friday. No one was injured; roofs of some houses were
damaged. Earlier, village administration head Manvel Kamendatyan said
that the electricity was turned off to avoid ignition.

Meanwhile, Azeri media outlets spread reports alleging that a woman
was wounded by Armenians. However, no official comments followed.

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/176460/
http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/CrisisWatch/2014/cw127.pdf

Is An Armenian "Maidan" Possible?

IS AN ARMENIAN “MAIDAN” POSSIBLE?

Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso, Italy
March 3 2014

Mikayel Zolyan | Yerevan
3 March 2014

The Armenian political elite and the general public are divided on the
account of the Kiev events. The main question, however, is whether
the Ukrainian revolution may spill out to Armenia

In the evening of February 20, in the Armenian city of Spitak, several
young activists appeared on one of the central squares, named after
Viktor Yanukovich. They covered the plaque that read “Viktor Yanukovich
square” with a self-made sign with the name “Sergey Nigoyan square”.

Sergey Nigoyan, an ethnic Armenian from Eastern Ukraine, was one
of the first victims of the clashes in Kiev, allegedly killed by a
pro-government sniper on January 22.

As for Yanukovich, he was the head of a construction company that
took part in the reconstruction of earthquake-hit northern Armenia
during the last years of the Soviet Unions, and the square was named
after him a sign of gratitude for this work.

Of course, there are doubts as to whether Yanukovich’s role in the
reconstruction would have been so highly appreciated had he not become
an influential politician: the square was named after him in 2008,
when he was already the leader of the Regions’ Party in Ukraine.

Arayik Harutyunyan, member of a recently formed “Civil Contract”
political movement, says that he had been thinking about the symbolic
renaming of the square for months, after he heard about the first
cases of violence against protesters.

When on February 20 the news spread about the bloodshed in Kiev,
he had no more doubts.

“I do not think Yanukovich deserves a square named after him”,
Arayik explains. “Thousands of people helped Armenia after the
earthquake, including many Ukrainians, but the square was named after
Yanukovich… this was a purely political decision”.

The choice of Sergey Nigoyan’s name was not a coincidence: for many
young Armenians he became a symbol of liberty and resistance.

Nigoyan was not the only ethnic Armenian among the victims: Georgi
Hyrutiunian, from the western Ukrainian town of Rivne, was killed on
February 20, when the clashes escalated.

People power or conspiracy?

Sergey Nigoyan (web)

However, not everyone in Armenia shares positive views about the
Ukrainian revolutionaries.

Many Armenians are wary of the Ukrainian events, seeing them as a
showdown between Russian and Western secret services, rather than a
popular revolution.

Russian language sources, both on television and Internet, remain
the main source of information about the events in the Post-Soviet
space for the majority of Armenians.

Therefore, the image of chaos in Ukraine that the Russian state media
has been promoting, has influenced the perceptions of the Ukrainian
events in Armenia.

Some Armenians even share Moscow’s view of Ukrainian revolutionaries as
“fascists” and “criminals”.

Even after Nigoyan’s death captured the attention of Armenian media,
some of the commentary aired the view that Nigoyan’s death was in vain,
since he had found himself on the wrong side of the barricades.

This ambivalence about how to react to the Ukrainian events seems
to go up to the highest echelons of the Armenian government. On the
one hand, they do not want to displease the Russian authorities,
but simply subscribing to Moscow’s view would further complicate
relations with Western partners.

Some pro-government figures openly embraced the Yanukovich’s version of
events: thus, pro-government member of parliament Artashes Geghamyan
accused “outside forces” of using “technologies of destruction”
in Ukraine.

Higher-level government officials have been more careful in their
comments, preferring to avoid the topic, especially after the defeat
of Yanukovich became obvious.

When in the National Assembly the opposition suggested a minute
of silence in memory of the Ukrainian protesters killed during the
clashes, the parliament speaker agreed, but he added that the deputies
should honor all victims, including those from the police force.

The opposition is more outspoken about the Ukrainian events,
pointing to similarities between Armenia and Ukraine, and implying
that Armenian government may repeat the fate of Yanukovich. However,
opposition politicians are also careful to tone down their comments
when it comes to the geopolitical rivalry between Russia and the West,
as no political force wants to come off as anti-Russian.

Armenia and the Ukraine: so similar, yet so different

Of course, the biggest question is whether the Ukrainian revolution
may spill out to Armenia.

Similarities between Ukraine and Armenia are plenty: both lack energy
resources and are heavily dependent on foreign supplies, both were
hit hard by the financial crisis and never fully recovered, both have
a serious corruption problem.

In both countries, the government has been accused of election fraud
and other authoritarian tendencies, but both countries have a degree
of political and media freedom, which puts them ahead of typical
post-Soviet autocracies like Belarus.

However, there are also important differences.

The Armenian opposition has been in disarray since the presidential
elections of 2013, when, in spite of claims of election fraud,
the opposition failed to unite, and post-election protests ended in
a fiasco.

Also, given Armenia’s geopolitical situation, the European option,
which mobilized at least part of protesters in Ukraine, seems
relatively feeble for Armenia.

Finally, Armenia is involved into an ongoing conflict with Azerbaijan
and has unresolved issues with Turkey, and against that background
an internal stand-off of the kind that happened in Ukraine would be
extremely risky for Armenia.

With all that in mind, it is clear why many Armenians are skeptical
that the Ukrainian events will have any substantial influence on
Armenia.

However, some disagree.

Poet Marine Petrosyan, who is also well known for her political
activism, says “I remember 1987, when protests had started in various
places all over the USSR, and many people in Armenia were saying that
Armenians are different, there is no way they will rise up against
the system… Only a few months later the Karabakh movement started,
and hundreds of thousands were on the street protesting”.

Arshak, a small business owner from Yerevan, says he was shocked
by the casualties in Kiev: “I don’t want something like that to
happen in Armenia and I don’t think it’s possible”. But, he says,
“Armenians need to do something in order to remind the government that
it is supposed to serve the people, as Ukrainians had done… Whoever
comes to power in Ukraine, all those deaths would not be in vain:
from now on, people in power will realize that sooner or later they
will have to answer for what they are doing”.

http://www.balcanicaucaso.org/eng/All-news/Is-an-Armenian-Maidan-possible-148822

Gazprom’s Expansion In Armenia Guarantees Sound And Sustainable Deve

GAZPROM’S EXPANSION IN ARMENIA GUARANTEES SOUND AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ARMENIAN FUEL AND ENERGY SECTOR

Your Petrochemical News
March 3 2014

Monday, Mar 03, 2014

A working meeting between Alexey Miller, Chairman of the Gazprom
Management Committee and Serzh Sargsyan, President of the Republic of
Armenia took place today in Yerevan as part of Gazprom delegation’s
visit to Armenia.

The parties addressed the main cooperation issues in the energy
sector. It was stressed that the international agreements signed
in December 2013 gave a major boost to further economic development
of Armenia.

A focus was placed on prospective activities of Gazprom Armenia
(former ArmRosgazprom), which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Gazprom. The meeting noted that enhancing the reliability of gas
supplies to Armenian consumers was the main priority of the company.

Alexey Miller and Serzh Sargsyan agreed to jointly develop a General
Gas Supply and Gasification Scheme of Armenia.

As part of the visit, Alexey Miller met with employees of Gazprom
Armenia.

In addition, special attention was paid to the ongoing integration of
Gazprom Armenia into Gazprom. It was highlighted that adjusting the
corporate standards of Gazprom Armenia in alignment with those accepted
in Gazprom would significantly improve the company’s performance. The
meeting also considered the production and marketing outlook of
Gazprom Armenia.

“Gazprom’s expansion in Armenia guarantees sound and sustainable
development of Armenian fuel and energy sector, fortifies its energy
security and significantly contributes to the socioeconomic growth
of the country,” said Alexey Miller.

http://www.yourpetrochemicalnews.com/gazprom%E2%80%99s+expansion+in+armenia+guarantees+sound+and+sustainable+development+of+armenian+fuel+and+energy+sector_99279.html

Introduction Of Mandatory Funded Pension System In Armenia Difficult

INTRODUCTION OF MANDATORY FUNDED PENSION SYSTEM IN ARMENIA DIFFICULT TO IMPLEMENT IN PRACTICE – DEMOGRAPHER

YEREVAN, March 3, /ARKA/. Introduction of mandatory funded pension
system in Armenia is theoretically possible, but difficult to implement
in practice, said demographer Ruben Yeganyan.

“If the population of the country, particularly young people,
embraced by the new pension scheme, were solvent, this reform would
be acceptable in theory, but in practice it is difficult to imagine,”
he told ARKA.

According to him, the pension reform will create additional financial
hardship for the population, which is already facing numerous
difficulties.

Yeganyan argued that the segment of the population who the new scheme
embraces should be given freedom to choose it voluntarily.

Armenia’s Constitutional Court suspended last month Article 76 of the
new pension law, which provides for penalties for failed or delayed
pension tax payments, and the third paragraph of Article 86, which
obligates employed citizens to choose a pension fund, among other
parts of the law. The Court says it will conclude the inquiry on
March 28, 2014.

The constitutionality of the law was challenged by three opposition
parties in the National Assembly — the Armenian National Congress,
the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, and the Heritage Party —
along with the usually pro-government Prosperous Armenia Party.

The new pension system requires that all Armenian citizens born
after 1973 pay social security taxes equivalent to 5 percent of their
monthly wages, which will be matched and doubled by the government.

That money has to be deposited with private pension funds licensed
by the government late last December. -0-

– See more at:

http://arka.am/en/news/society/introduction_of_mandatory_funded_pension_system_in_armenia_difficult_to_implement_in_practice_demogr/#sthash.rxjg6BlL.dpuf

Heritage Party Member Shocked By Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s Speech

HERITAGE PARTY MEMBER SHOCKED BY LEVON TER-PETROSYAN’S SPEECH

March 03, 2014 | 12:41

YEREVAN. – Member of Heritage party Anahit Bakhsyan said she was
shocked by the March 1 demonstration of the Armenian National Congress
(ANC).

Speaking about ANC leader Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s speech, she said the
statements of the first president raised many questions. Bisharyan
said she was appalled by comparison between Georgian PM Bidzina
Ivanishvili and Prosperous Armenia leader Gagik Tsarkyan.

In turn, former deputy defense minister Vahan Shirkhanyan was
surprised only by Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s positive attitude towards
joining Customs Union.

Photo by Arsen Sargsyan/NEWS.am

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Residents Of Armenian Village Protest Construction Of Hydroelectric

RESIDENTS OF ARMENIAN VILLAGE PROTEST CONSTRUCTION OF HYDROELECTRIC PLANT

03.03.2014 21:11 epress.am

On March 1, about 100 villagers gathered in the center of Karbi,
a village in Armenia’s Aragatsotn marz (province), to meet with
Aragatsotn marzpet (regional governor) Sargis Sahakyan, the village
mayor, and a representative of the developer company building a
hydroelectric plant near the villages of Karbi and Ohanavan. Several
members of the Pan-Armenian Environmental Front (PAEF) were also
present at the meeting.

According to a statement issued by PAEF, Karbi residents are against
the construction. They argue that the a hydroelectric plant will
consume so much water from the Aparan reservoir that there won’t be
any irrigation water for their apple orchards. Meanwhile, sometimes
there is not enough irrigation water for them even today.

According to the environmentalists, during the nearly two-hour long
meeting, there was still no response to the question of whether there
is a project under which this construction should be carried out.

“The villagers themselves didn’t know eventually what is being built:
a hydroelectric plant, a waterline, a reservoir, a fishpond, or
something else? The marzpet and the representative of the developer,
on one hand, insisted that what is being built is not a nuclear power
plant, and on the other hand, guaranteed that the construction of a
hydroelectric plant will not reduce the villagers’ irrigation water,”
PAEF wrote on its Facebook page.

http://www.epress.am/en/2014/03/03/residents-of-armenian-village-protest-construction-of-hydroelectric-plant.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tEfLzaLUTA

Crimea’s Return To Russia To Speed Up Karabakh Settlement – Expert

CRIMEA’S RETURN TO RUSSIA TO SPEED UP KARABAKH SETTLEMENT – EXPERT

14:51 * 03.03.14

An Armenian political analyst on Monday drew parallels between
Nagorno-Karabakh and the autonomous region of Crimea, considering
the statuses of both the result of major historical errors.

Sergey Shakaryants said he thinks that in case Crimea becomes an
independent state or is returned to Russia that will positively
impact the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict conflict,
significantly facilitating the process.

“A historical fact was violated in both cases. Crimea’s handover
to Ukraine resulted from an overnight decision, likewise Artsakh
[Nagorno-Karabakh] and Nakhicevan were handed over to Azerbaijan.

Crimea’s independence or return will be extremely advantageous to
Armenia,” he told a news conference.

The expert said he doesn’t expect any war in Crimea, noting that the
country does not have forces powerful enough to fight back the Russian
Black Sea Fleet. “The Black Sea Fleet alone is powerful enough to
solve the problem; even if there is an intervention by Turkey. The
navy will fight back Turkey’s [forces] in just 48 hours,” he added.

Addressing the Ukrainian crisis, Shakaryants said he doesn’t absolutely
find it a revolution. He described the tensions as just an attempt
to replace one class of oligarchs with another.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/03/03/sergey-shaqaryanc/

Russia, China ‘In Broad Agreement’ On Ukraine

RUSSIA, CHINA ‘IN BROAD AGREEMENT’ ON UKRAINE

Mon Mar 3, 2014 10:31AM GMT

US ‘orchestrated overthrow’ in Ukraine
‘Neo-Nazi leaders hold Ukraine captive’

Related Viewpoints:

Ukraine, Egypt: A tale of two coups

The Russian Foreign Ministry says Russia is in broad agreement with
China on the situation in crisis-hit Ukraine.

The ministry’s announcement followed a telephone conversation between
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and his Chinese counterpart
Wang Yi on Monday.

“The foreign ministers have exchanged their views on the situation
in Ukraine. They noted a broad overlap of the Russian and Chinese
views on the current situation in and around this country (Ukraine),”
the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

In addition, the Russian ministry said the two ministers pledged to
continue close contacts on the issue.

Meanwhile, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is expected to meet
with Lavrov later in the day on the sidelines of the UN Human Rights
Council in Geneva to discuss the spiraling crisis in Ukraine.

The developments come as seven major industrialized countries
denounced Russia’s military actions in Ukraine’s semi-autonomous
Republic of Crimea.

On March 1, the upper house of the Russian parliament unanimously
approved a request by President Vladimir Putin to deploy troops into
the Crimea if necessary.

The approval came after Crimea’s regional Prime Minister Sergey
Aksenov asked Putin to help restore peace and calm in the region
amid tensions over the region’s resistance against new pro-Western
authorities in Kiev.

Russia has dispatched hundreds of its troops to the Ukrainian territory
of Crimea “to protect its interests and also of those Russian speakers
in that region.”

CAH/HJL/HRB

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2014/03/03/353041/russia-china-in-agreement-on-ukraine/

Le President De La Republique Francaise A Rendu Hommage A Missak Man

LE PRESIDENT DE LA REPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE A RENDU HOMMAGE A MISSAK MANOUCHIAN

ARMENIE

Hayastani Hanrapetoutioun rend compte a la > de la ceremonie
d’hommage, en Presence du President de la Republique, du Ministre
armenien des AE, de Charles Aznavour et des membres du Gouvernement
francais, a Missak Manouchian et a son groupe a l’occasion du 70ème
anniversaire de leur execution. Le quotidien cite des extraits du
discours du President Hollande, rappelant que Missak Manouchian etait
l’un des Armeniens rescapes du Genocide qui a choisi la France, mais
qu’il ne fut pas le seul Armenien a vouloir combattre pour la France
et pour la liberte. / Hayots Achkhar, Novoye Vremia

Extrait de la revue de presse de l’Ambassade de France en Armenie en
date du 24 fevrier 2014

lundi 3 mars 2014