Armenia Conmemora El Centenario Del Genocidio Turco

ARMENIA CONMEMORA EL CENTENARIO DEL GENOCIDIO TURCO

Diario Jornada, Argentina
19 marzo 2015

En una Erevan sumida en una paz y una cotidianidad que parecen ajenas
a la fecha que se acerca, el presidente de Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan,
anuncio que su país conmemorara el proximo mes los cien años del
genocidio cometido por el Imperio Otomano unificando al mundo en
“un llamado único para prevenir futuros genocidios”.

En un foro organizado por la Comision del Centenario del Genocidio
Armenio en Erevan, del que participo Telam, el mandatario destaco que
“la política negacionista de Turquía”, el Estado heredero del Imperio
Otomano, “crea un precedente peligroso para que vuelvan a ocurrir
crímenes tan graves como el genocidio de Ruanda” o, mas recientemente,
“el barbarismo del Estado Islamico”.

“Al negarlo, el crimen, el genocidio, sigue ocurriendo”, sentencio
Sargsyan.

Mientras en Argentina la comunidad armenia prepara una serie de actos
para el proximo 24 de abril, día en el que este pueblo recuerda año
tras año la muerte de alrededor de un millon y medio de sus antepasados
a manos de los otomanos durante la Primera Guerra Mundial, en Erevan
el gobierno se prepara para una conmemoracion nunca antes vista.

Presidentes de Europa y Rusia ya confirmaron que participaran de los
actos del proximo mes en Erevan, que tambien atraeran a cientos sino
miles de los ocho o diez millones de armenios que se estima que viven
en el mundo.

Pese a que no hay cifras oficiales, el gobierno armenio cree que la
quinta o sexta diaspora se encuentra en Argentina, detras de países
como Rusia, Estados Unidos y Francia.

Ademas, de los actos planeados en Buenos Aires, habran cientos de
conmemoraciones en las escuelas y los centros culturales armenios de
todo el mundo.

Pero el plato principal se servira en Erevan, una ciudad un poco mas
grande que la capital argentina pero con apenas un poco mas del tercio
de la poblacion porteña.

Allí, una vez terminado el acto central que reunira a presidentes
de todo el mundo y para el que ya estan acreditados medio millar de
periodistas extranjeros, según el gobierno, un recital de la famosa
banda System of the Down sacudira la tradicional tranquilidad de la
pequeña ciudad.

Pero a un mes de albergar la mayor ceremonia de su historia, la
capital armenia vive a su ritmo, ajena a lo que se viene.

El único símbolo que hace referencia al centenario del genocidio es
la flor del olvido, que sutilmente decora las puertas o las entradas
de las escuelas y que en Armenia se conoce, por el contrario, como la
“flor del no olvido”.

Solo esas pequeñas flores violetas de corazon amarillo sobresalen
en esta ciudad, en la que la regla es la mezcla, la transicion,
bañada por luces tenues que irrumpen en la oscuridad pero no llegan
a iluminar la noche.

Pequeños colectivos modernos se mezclan en el centro con modelos viejos
de tranvías de los años sovieticos, mientras que hombres vestidos con
puloveres holgados y camperas de cuero oscuras -un típico atuendo de
los fríos ex países socialistas- se cruzan en las calles con jovenes
en trajes entallados y zapatos lustradísimos en punta, como dicta la
última moda en París.

Erevan mantiene la arquitectura cuadrada y despojada de cualquier
intento de decoracion de la ex Union Sovietica, pero ahora estos
edificios de tres o cuatro pisos estan ocupados por las tiendas de
los diseñadores mas caros de Europa y Estados Unidos.

Pero quizas la característica mas simbolica de esta pequeña y apacible
ciudad se encuentra en su plaza central, la Plaza de la República.

Esta plaza, que en realidad es el espacio en el que confluyen cuatro
grandes avenidas, esta rodeada por cinco grandes y macizos edificios.

En la mayoría de los países, este simbolico lugar estaría dominado por
la sede de gobierno, sin embargo, en la capital armenia, la sede del
Ejecutivo es apenas uno de los edificios que bordean los costados de
la plaza, junto con la Cancillería y un banco y un hotel extranjeros.

El edificio central, el que mira de lleno a la plaza mas importante
de Armenia, es el Museo de Historia nacional.

Porque aunque el presidente concentre su discurso en el futuro en
abril proximo, en Armenia, la historia, aún la mas dura y dolorosa,
es símbolo de orgullo, de superacion y de perseverancia.

http://www.diariojornada.com.ar/122213/internacional/Armenia_conmemora_el_centenario_del_genocidio_turco

Results Of Amulsar Gold Mining Document Study Results: Conclusions A

RESULTS OF AMULSAR GOLD MINING DOCUMENT STUDY RESULTS: CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS

15:27 March 23, 2015

EcoLur

Specialists give professional assessment to Amulsar open pit mining
project implemented by Lydian International Company in Armenia with
the financial support of the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development, EBRD, and International Finance Corporation, IFC.

This time it’s Harutyun Movsisyan, PhD in Geological Sciences,
Associate Professor, who submitted his assessment on the official
website of Aarhus Centers, , which particularly says:
“The EIA submitted by the company mentions heap leach facility with
a capacity of 106 million tons and says nothing that this volume is
wastes to be collected in the tailing dump, which needs technical
conditions, special project, hazard category and a passport. It
mentions only the area and nothing about fencing etc. The project
excludes penetration of hazardous substances (note by EcoLur: gold
extraction with cyanide) into environment and doesn’t plan to locate
recording detectors below the protecting layer. Only these devices
can fix any leak to take measures against.

The next problem is the seismic assessment of Amulsar project area.

The EIA mentions middle extent of seismic risks, while the section on
a heap leach facility doesn’t mention seismicity at all. A question
arises: how seismicity can be assessed, if the technical proposal
on facility construction is missing and compliance with technical
standards is missing. We speak about seismicity of 5-6 magnitude,
which is underestimated assessment for this region. Amulsar is located
in the seismic zone within the ranges of 0.2-0.3 g and higher, which
can be interpreted as 8-9 magnitude seismicity.

The project mentions about the wastes and barren rock, which will
be accumulated after open pit, but it forgets about the heap leach
facility located in a distance of 1.2 km from Gndevaz Village and
adsorption-desorption-recovery (ADR) plant. The sanitary zone is
calculated in a distance of 1.5 km from the nearest house, which is
incorrect. Sanitary zone is determined as 1 km from buffer zone, which
separates residential area from the zone of business activities. Under
the international standards, this distance is 2 km from the buffer
zone, so the plant must be relocated in a distance of 3 km from the
residential area.

Then what about rationality. Under the project, dead pits will be
filled with barren rock. But the data show that at the depth of 50-100
meters ores are available, while according to RA Code on Subsoil, the
development of the mine is permitted, if absence of further resources
is proved. Nevertheless, the project doesn’t mention anything about
expected resources of expansion, reclaiming plans and waste generation
and disposal limits project, i.e. expected resources and balance are
subject to state assessment.”

http://ecolur.org/en/news/mining/results-of-amulsar-gold-mining-document-study-results-conclusions-and-proposals/7144/
www.aarhus.am

Fewer States To Attend Events Marking Battle Of Gallipoli In Turkey

FEWER STATES TO ATTEND EVENTS MARKING BATTLE OF GALLIPOLI IN TURKEY

14:19 * 24.03.15

In his statement, Turkish President Recep Erdogan said that the
leaders of 102 states had been invited to events marking the Battle
of Gallipoli, scheduled for April 24.

According to the Agos newspaper, 25 states have been removed from
the list of invitees, but Ankara spares no effort to attract more
participants.

Charles, Prince of Wales, and his son Prince Harry are expected to
attend the event in Ankara.

The French and Russian Presidents, Francois Hollande and Vladimir
Putin, announced their intention to arrive in Armenia to attend events
marking the Armenian Genocide, on April 24.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2015/03/24/chanakkale/1626435

Ambassador: Czech Republic Will Be Represented At Armenian Genocide

AMBASSADOR: CZECH REPUBLIC WILL BE REPRESENTED AT ARMENIAN GENOCIDE CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS IN YEREVEN AT LEVEL OF PARLIAMENT VICE SPEAKER

by Tatevik Shahunyan

ARMINFO
Tuesday, March 24, 11:02

Czech Republic will be represented at the Armenian Genocide Centennial
events in Yerevan at the level of the parliament vice speaker, Czech
Ambassador to Armenia Petr Mikyska told ArmInfo.

“One of the parliamentary vice speakers will attend the events timed to
the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire,”
Ambassador Mikyska said.

The diplomat said it was anticipated that the speaker of the parliament
would attend the events in Yerevan. Unfortunately, he has been
hospitalized lately.

“Milan Stech was very much interested in attending the Armenian
Genocide Centennial commemorations in Yerevan,” the ambassador
assured ArmInfo.

Presidents of Russia and France have already announced their intention
to visit Armenia on April 24. Diplomatic sources told ArmInfo, Belarus
will be represented at the Armenian Genocide commemorations in Yerevan
at the level of president too. Joseph Daul, Chairman of the European
People’s Party and Anne Brasseur, PACE President, are also expected
to visit Armenia on April 24.

Meanwhile, Turkey is set to celebrate the Centennial of the Gallipoli
victory on April 24. Ankara has invited the world leaders to the
event. Leaders of Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, as well as Prince
Charles and Prince Harry have already confirmed their participation
in the “Gallipoli event”.

AGMI Publishes Memories Of Ottoman Armenian Sportsman Vahram Papazia

AGMI PUBLISHES MEMORIES OF OTTOMAN ARMENIAN SPORTSMAN VAHRAM PAPAZIAN

17:58, 24 Mar 2015
Siranush Ghazanchyan

The Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute has published memories of
Ottoman Armenian sportsman Vahram Papazian. The memoirs titled “Love,
love, love” are a very unique source of the pre-genocide history
of the Armenian life in the Ottoman Empire. It’s also an absolute
historical source of the history of sports and Olympic Games, World
War I, Armenian Genocide, as well as the refugees and migration.

For the first time in the Ottoman history two Armenian sportsmen
Vahram Papazian and Mkrtich Mkrian represented the Ottoman Turkey in
the fifth Olympic Games in Stockholm in 1912.

In the chapter “On the way to Stockholm” Papazian wrote: “In 1912, the
International Olympic Games were to be held in Stockholm, and Turkey
was invited to participate. However, the Turks had no athletes, while
the Armenians did. So the Armenians decided to send their athletes
to represent the huge Ottoman Empire and succeeded. Ottoman Turkey
participated twice in a similar international competition as an empire
thanks to two Armenian sportsmen, as you will see later on. The two
Armenian athletes brought honor to their country… …When I arrived
in Stockholm in the morning, I noticed that the streets and important
buildings were adorned with flags of all the countries participating
in the Olympic Games, but there was not a single Turkish flag among
them. I was very concerned about this. After all, I was the official
representative of the Ottoman Empire, and this slight against my
country was an insult to me.

I took a car and went straight to the Turkish embassy to express my
anger. With suitcases still in hand, I demanded immediate action.

After introducing myself and receiving congratulations from the
ambassador, I said: “Bey Effendi, Stockholm is depressing to me and
I would like to return to my country with my suitcases on my arm. All
of Stockholm is adorned with foreign flags, but not the Turkish flag,
and this is an insult to me and my country. I will only stay here
if measures are taken so the flag of my country flies among all
the others.

The Turkish ambassador petrified for a moment. Like many others, he
couldn’t believe that an Armenian could have such a strong love and
respect for their Turkish country. He probably did not realize the
clear fact that the Armenians have always loved their Turkish country,
that it was the Turks who didn’t love their loyal Armenian subjects,
and have always been persecuting them on each occasion…

… And two hours later, the Turkish flag was flying on every corner,
thanks to a young Armenian, who in a few years would be mourning
millions of unburied corpses of Armenians, all of them having been
massacred by the Turks.”

As a survivor and an eyewitness of the Armenian Genocides, Papazian
also gives us important information about the Armenian Genocide.

“One of the lies about the Armenian massacres is the statement that
the Armenians were massacred because they helped Russians by spying for
them. Even if this was true, what were the massacred honest, peaceful,
and loyal Armenian population of Harput, children and grandparents,
to blame for?

Vahram Papazian’s memoirs, published for the first time in English,
have been edited by Doctor of Sciences Mr. Hayk Demoyan, Director of
the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute. The Armenian version of the
book was published in Beirut in1962.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2015/03/24/agmi-publishes-memories-of-ottoman-armenian-sportsman-vahram-papazian/

Armenian Political Scientist Doesn’t Have High Hopes For Georgian Pa

ARMENIAN POLITICAL SCIENTIST DOESN’T HAVE HIGH HOPES FOR GEORGIAN PARLIAMENT’S ADOPTION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION DRAFT

17:00, 24 March, 2015

YEREVAN, 24 MARCH, ARMENPRESS. The Parliament of Georgia won’t pass a
resolution on the Armenian Genocide. “Taking into account Georgia’s
trade and economic relations with Turkey and Azerbaijan, as well as
the presence of Turkish and Azerbaijani communities in Georgia, the
Armenian deputies’ discussions on the Armenian Genocide resolution
in the Georgian parliament won’t be fruitful,” member of the board
of the European Integration” NGO, political scientist Narek Minasyan
mentioned during a March 24 press conference, as “Armenpress” reports.

The political scientist noted that the ruling Georgian elite is facing
two very serious choices ahead of the Centennial of the Armenian
Genocide. “Turkey, which is Georgia’s number one partner in trade
and economy, has invited Georgia to participate in the celebrations
dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Battle of Gallipoli, and
Georgia’s decision to accept or decline the invitation will show the
relations of which country are considered overriding for the Georgian
government,” Minasyan underscored.

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/798963/armenian-political-scientist-doesn%E2%80%99t-have-high-hopes-for-georgian-parliament%E2%80%99s-adoption-of-armenian.html

Armenian Foreign Ministry Tries To Find Out If There Were Armenian C

ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY TRIES TO FIND OUT IF THERE WERE ARMENIAN CITIZENS OF BOARD THE CRASHED AIRBUS A320

by Marianna Lazarian

ARMINFO
Tuesday, March 24, 15:54

The Armenian Foreign Ministry is specifying information about possible
presence of Armenian citizens on board the Airbus A320, which was
flying from Barcelona to Dusseldorf, Foreign Ministry Spokesman Tigran
Balayan has told ArmInfo.

“We are taking the relevant measures. As soon as we have some data,
we will make them public”, he says.

It has previously been reported about the crash of the A320 Airbus
(German Wings) that was making a Barcelona-Dusseldorf flight.

According to preliminary reports, there were 142 passengers, 2 pilots
and 4 crewmembers on board the plane. The wreckage was found near a
French village.

La Force Du Peuple Armenien Reside Dans Sa Decentralisation

LA FORCE DU PEUPLE ARMENIEN RESIDE DANS SA DECENTRALISATION

Publie le : 23-03-2015

Info Collectif VAN – – Le Collectif VAN vous
invite a liere cet article publie sur le site Repair le 18 mars 2015.

Repair

mercredi 18 mars 2015

Razmik Panossian

Politologue canadien, Directeur du Departement des Communautes
Armeniennes de la Fondation Calouste Gulbenkian (Lisbonne)

Dans cet essai, Razmik Panossian explique qu’il est temps de degriser
ce qu’il nomme l’>, repond Erevan. Il est, après tout, le seul
Etat survivant (sans oublier l’Artsakh). Beaucoup dans la diaspora
acceptent cela et se tournent vers l’Armenie, mais sans toutefois
y retourner. D’autres repondent : , soulignent-ils, des autorites sovietiques dans les elections du Catholicosat
en 1956 a Antelias au Liban), le Comite central du Parti communiste
armenien a decide en 1957 de developper de nouvelles politiques et
de nouveaux instruments pour augmenter l’influence de l’Armenie
sovietique sur la diaspora. La manifestation la plus concrète de
cette nouvelle politique a ete la creation de la Spiurkahayutyan Hed
Meshagutayin Gabi Gomide5 (Comite pour les liens culturels avec les
Armeniens de la diaspora), suivie par la publication de magazines,
manuels, et d’autres initiatives, qui visaient toutes la diaspora. Un
document revelateur de 1974 dans les archives, intitule en Armenie, la plus grande des
multiples vagues de rapatriement. Loin d’etre une entite passive, la
diaspora, sous la direction des partis et des organisations politiques
communautaires mobilises, s’est organisee et a defendu des questions
nationales. Elle-meme etait divisee selon des lignes ideologiques :
certains dans la diaspora soutenaient la patrie sovietique dès les
annees 1920, tandis que d’autres rejetaient le regime communiste. Il
est interessant de retracer l’evolution de l’organisation la plus
influente de diaspora, le parti antisovietique dachnak, du rejet total
de la Republique dans les annees 1920 et 1930 a l’acceptation comme
une patrie dans les annees 1970 et 1980. Alors que le > global se reproduisait au sein des communautes importantes de
la diaspora armenienne, les militants des deux côtes ont contribue
a sa construction et a son entretien. Neanmoins, en depit du rideau
de fer intra-communautaire, la vision de l’Armenie sovietique et de
ses allies dans la diaspora a fini par devenir hegemonique.

Les gouvernements postsovietiques en Armenie, parfois soutenus
par des conseillers de la diaspora, ont toujours adhere a cette
logique. Bien sûr, il ya eu un changement significatif dans l’attitude
d’Erevan envers la diaspora, en particulier entre les gouvernements
Ter-Petrossian et Kotcharian. Comme les administrations successives
ont tendu la main a la diaspora, la poussee d’inspiration sovietique
a la centralisation et au contrôle est restee. Parfois explicitement,
a d’autres moments implicitement. Le ressentiment actuel chez certains
intellectuels et dirigeants de la diaspora envers l’Armenie est une
reaction aux tentatives de ses fonctionnaires pour contrôler — ou a
tout du moins diriger la diaspora — que ce soit par des mecanismes
institutionnels ou ideologiques.

En ce qui concerne la tendance au contrôle, la diaspora n’est pas en
reste et il convient egalement de noter que, dans les annees 1990,
une attitude prevalait chez certains leaders de la diaspora, notamment
dans le parti dachnak : en tant que leaders de la nation,
ils devaient gouverner l’Armenie independante — ou au moins avoir leur
mot a dire dans sa politique — sans avoir aucune presence serieuse
en Armenie. La mobilisation de la diaspora (generalement couronnee
de succès) contre les politiques de rapprochement de l’Armenie
vis-a-vis de la Turquie (par exemple, les Protocoles de 2009) est un
autre exemple de l’affirmation des priorites de la diaspora. Quand
il s’agit de relations avec la Turquie, les Armeniens de la diaspora
sentent qu’ils ont leur mot a dire legitime, et qu’ils devraient etre
en mesure d’influencer, si ce n’est definir, la politique.

Contrôler la diaspora armenienne a partir d’un centre –que ce soit
Erevan ou ailleurs — est impossible. La diaspora est trop diverse,
trop decentralisee et trop independante pour etre contrôlee, du moins
avec succès. Elle peut certes etre affaiblie, mais elle ne peut pas
etre contrôlee efficacement. Et ne devrait pas l’etre. Sa force meme,
et la force du peuple armenien, resident dans le fait que la nation
a toujours ete decentralisee. La culture armenienne a survecu au
genocide en raison de sa decentralisation, en raison de ses multiples
centres culturels et multiples communautes de la diaspora. Ni les
Jeunes-Turcs, ni le regime de terreur de Staline n’ont pu detruire
complètement tout un peuple parce qu’il y avait des Armeniens ailleurs.

La centralisation et le contrôle sont les deux faces d’une meme pièce
(et incarnes dans de nombreux Etats). Les deux sont, a mon avis,
prejudiciables a la survie du peuple armenien. Voici les trois raisons
pour lesquelles je crois qu’ils sont des strategies dangereuses :

Premièrement, comme mentionne ci-dessus, ils sont historiquement
etrangers a l’experience de la nation armenienne. L’>, avec
ses nuances de centralisation, a ete un cri de ralliement rhetorique
pendant des siècles, creant des poètes et des hommes politiques de
la communaute, mais pas des decideurs politiques serieux. Meme si
nous revenons sept siècles en arrière, jusqu’aux derniers royaumes
armeniens existants, nous voyons qu’il y avait des Etats extremement
decentralises avec de puissants princes locaux qui maintenaient le
roi en echec. La centralisation ne fait tout simplement pas partie
de la tradition politique armenienne. La centralisation communiste
s’est accomplie dans le sang et la douleur, et n’a finalement pas
reussi en Armenie.

Deuxièmement, dans la conjoncture actuelle, posons-nous la question
honnetement : la centralisation vers où, et le contrôle par qui ?

L’Armenie elle-meme est confrontee a une serie de graves problèmes.

Oui, c’est le seul Etat armenien survivant, mais c’est un pays avec
des institutions faibles, un système politique dans lequel le pouvoir
reel est exerce par des moyens informels, un système economique
oligarchique, et des politiques etrangères et militaires qui sont
entièrement a la charge d’une superpuissance regionale. Malgre les
nombreux succès qu’a remportes l’Armenie au cours des deux dernières
decennies, elle reste neanmoins un etat relativement faible dans un
voisinage difficile, avec un problème d’emigration considerable. Ce
n’est tout simplement pas une bonne politique que d’en faire le point
de debut et de fin de tout ce qui est armenien. Avoir une diaspora
forte et independante est l’equivalent d’une

http://www.collectifvan.org/article.php?r=0&id=86840
www.collectifvan.org

Refining The Vine: Winemaking In Armenia And Georgia Looking To Find

REFINING THE VINE: WINEMAKING IN ARMENIA AND GEORGIA LOOKING TO FIND MARKET RELEVANCE

FEATURES | 23.03.15 | 10:58

By GAYANE MKRTCHYAN
ArmeniaNow reporter

As the two ancient South Caucasus nations known to have grown vines
and made wine for millennia Armenians and Georgians have had as much
‘good-neighborly’ relations as competition in the ancient trade both
during the Soviet period and after independence.

As the geopolitical paths of the two wine-making nations forked after
the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union – with Georgia eventually
choosing closer integration with Europe and Armenia striving to
preserve its traditional alliance with Russia – grape-growers and
winemakers in both countries also began to see their future in the
increasingly competitive world from different perspectives.

While there may be points of difference also related to the past,
viticulturists and winemaking experts in both countries agree that
the 20th century wasn’t the best time for winemaking. The Soviet
collectivization of vineyards in the 1930s when farmers were deprived
of ownership of their land was perhaps one of the strongest blows to
the industry.

“A winemaker is first of all a person and this person needs to be
the master of his own production, the owner of his vineyard,” says
Shalva Kheruani, a veteran winemaker and president of the Degustation
Association of Georgia.

“If there hadn’t been the 70 years of Soviet rule Georgia perhaps
would rank high among wine-making European nations today,” he adds.

Avaz Harutyunyan, the president of the Union of Winemakers of Armenia,
agrees that vineyards lost their “masters” because of the Soviet rule.

“For 300 years grapes had had their master in this land. But
[after the Soviet rule] we lost our face. That’s why the world does
not acknowledge either us or Georgians as major grape-growing or
wine-making nations,” says Harutyunyan.

Even so, the two nations that claim to be the world’s oldest winemakers
lost even more in terms of the industry after gaining independence
and adopting capitalist rules of production.

Among other things it also meant that free-market rules would apply
to winemaking – an industry that is labor intensive and requires
time and money before becoming profitable. As a result, the areas of
vineyards dramatically decreased in both South Caucasus countries.

In Soviet times, Georgia’s vineyards occupied a territory of 160,000
hectares, while today they make only 48,000 hectares. In Armenia the
territory under vineyards has shrunk from 36,000 during the Soviet
period to just 18,000 hectares today. In Armenia, 95 percent of locally
grown grapes procured for the industry are used for brandy production,
and only five percent goes for wine.

While brandy making is a relatively new trade in Armenia, the nation’s
winemaking culture and traditions date back to 4,000 BC. In 2011,
a group of local and international archeologists found proof of the
world’s oldest winery in a cave near the village of Areni in central
Armenia.

But today winemaking is more advanced in Georgia, which also takes
pride in its being one of the oldest wine regions in the world.

The major shift came in the 19th century when Tsarist Russia declared
Armenia to be a “country of brandy” and Georgia a “country of wine”.

That distinction followed major investments in brandy production
in Armenia in the late 19th and early 20th centuries when Armenian
brandy became famous around the world.

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill is known to have become a
big fan of Armenian brandy (or Russian brandy as he knew it) after
getting a taste of it at a 1945 Stalin-hosted conference of World
War II allies.

And while Stalin each month sent a box of ‘Russian brandy’ to Churchill
after the Yalta meeting, Harutyunyan says apart from that the Soviets
did little to promote the noble beverage produced by Armenians abroad
otherwise and its sales were mostly limited to the 15 Soviet republics.

“When the Soviet Union collapsed, Armenia, by inertia, began to
fit itself into the Russian market, instead of trying to reach new
markets,” the specialist says.

But Georgia had to look beyond Russia when the two fell out over
geopolitical matters and Moscow banned imports of Georgian wines
in 2006.

Georgian Degustation Association head Kheruani says Georgian winemakers
realized then that they needed to pay more attention to quality to
win new markets.

“We went back to the 19th century as our wine tried to find its
owners,” he remembers.

Georgian exports declined dramatically – from 50 million bottles
in 2005 to just about 9 million today. But quality, Kheruani says,
had to be raised in order to “surprise” the consumer in conditions
of suddenly stiffer competition.

“Our vineyards today have their own ‘passports’, the State determines
when the harvest should begin and end [to achieve the best results].

We have wine inspectors and it is no longer possible to procure grapes
of poor quality today,” the Georgian winemaking expert explains.

His Armenian counterpart says that quality issues aside, Armenian
wines also need to be duly promoted abroad and besides domestically
organized wine festivals Armenia also needs to organize such events
abroad – something that Georgia has done in recent years.

“In Armenia the government has put emphasis on brandy production
so that we don’t lose that as well, but problems are evident even
in that sector,” says Harutyunyan, pointing out that in conditions
of recurrent crises in Russia, which is the main export market for
Armenian alcoholic beverages, brandy production should not be the
only emphasis.

According to Harutyunyan, winemaking is just as profitable, if not
even more profitable, as brandy production and if proper investments
are made in wine production in Armenia it may provide great revenues
for the nation.

“This does not mean giving up brandy production, we just need to give
up the idea of promoting brandy as our only top product,” he says.

Recently, Armenian winemakers for the first time participated in an
international wine festival in Dusseldorf, Germany. Harutyunyan says
that participation by five companies became possible due to assistance
from the government and one international organization.

The specialist believes that for the government and leading producers
it is crucial that Armenian wines – like Georgian wines – can also
be showcased at major international fairs.

http://armenianow.com/society/features/61655/armenia_georgia_wine_making

Syrian Parliament Speaker Calls On International Community To Condem

SYRIAN PARLIAMENT SPEAKER CALLS ON INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY TO CONDEMN THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

12:04, 23 Mar 2015
Siranush Ghazanchyan

Speaker of the People’s Assembly of Syria, Dr. Mohammad Jihad al-Laham
received Armenian Ambassador to Syria Arshak Poladyan on March 21.

Ambassador Poladyan conveyed to the Syrian Parliament Speaker a
congratulatory letter from Galust Sahakyan, President of the National
Assembly of Armenia.

In the letter Galust Sahakyan expressed gratitude for holding a
special sitting at the Syrian People’s Assembly dedicated to the 100th
anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, for condemning this heavy crime
and expressing support to the Armenian people.

The Armenian Speaker expressed special gratitude to the Syrian people,
who opened the doors and gave refuge to Armenian Genocide survivors.

“The humane attitude of the Syrian nation and its leaders is always
remembered and appreciated by the Armenian people,” Mr. Sahakyan wrote.

At the meeting Dr. Mohammad Jihad al-Laham once again referred to
the genocide committed by the Ottoman Empire against the Armenian
peoples and called on the international community to condemn this
heinous crime against humanity.

Ambassador Poladyan, in turn, briefed the Syrian Parlaiment Speaker on
the events dedicated to the 100thanniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

Other issues of regional importance were also discussed.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2015/03/23/syrian-parliament-speaker-calls-on-international-community-to-condemn-the-armenian-genocide/