The President Expressed His Condolences To Abajyan Family

THE PRESIDENT EXPRESSED HIS CONDOLENCES TO ABAJYAN FAMILY

15:41, 16 January, 2013

YEREVAN, JANUARAY 16, ARMENPRESS: Serzh Sargsyan President of the
Republic of Armenia sent a telegram to the family of Abajyan extending
his condolences in connection with the death of People’s Artist
of Armenia Vladimir Abajyan. As Information and Public Relations
Department told Armenpress, the telegram in particular runs.

“I learned with sorrow about the death of beloved actor and reciter,
a renowned master of theater and film, the People’s Artist of Armenia
Vladimir Abajyan death. He was doubtless a unique actor and commentator
of Armenian poetry and will remain the same for thousands of fans of
his art.

Once again I express my deepest condolences to Vladimir Abajyan family,
friends, colleagues and his art fans of theater community.

When The Authorities Legitimize The Opposition

WHEN THE AUTHORITIES LEGITIMIZE THE OPPOSITION
Armen Arakelyan

20:12, January 15, 2013

The chosen strategy of refusing to participate in the presidential
elections taken by the major Armenian political parties–the
Prosperous Armenia Party, the Armenian National Congress and
ARF-Dashnaktsutyun–was a concrete action and an expression
of political will. But their mutual decision wasn’t a way to
promote action; instead it created inaction, self-isolation and
marginalization.

Prosperous Armenia and the Congress not only refused to field their own
candidate or support another, they withdrew to their dens without even
clarifying their positions on the upcoming elections and, especially,
their possible actions after the elections. These two powerful parties,
which have the biggest potential to influence public opinion, made it
clear to society that not only are they unprepared for these elections
and any future political struggle, they also take no responsibility.

ARF-Dashnaktsutyun’s case is a little different. Although the party
said it wouldn’t field a candidate thereby misleading its electorate,
it avoided being completely left out of the game. Although isolated,
ARF-Dashnaktsutyun clarified some rules of the game for itself–
it wouldn’t support the incumbent president under any circumstances
and more importantly, unlike Prosperous Armenia, it didn’t refuse to
develop a common political platform and be guided by that. Rather,
the party declared it as their main goal regardless of the election
outcome.

The question here is not whether the proposal of such ideas and
principles is fabricated or real, whether ARF-Dashnaktsutyun is
being honest or how persistent it will be in pursuing those issues
in future. What’s important is providing a basis for justifying being
left in the political arena. ARF-Dashnaktsutyun might not find enough
arguments to do so, but it positioned itself as a passive observer
just like Prosperous Armenia and the Congress. It’s hard to say if
the party will be able to overcome its situation after the elections.

Anyway, this act of complete self-isolation made by Prosperous Armenia
and the Congress, and the partial self-isolation of ARF-Dashnaktsutyun,
brought them to a deadlock that is quite difficult to break in
a normal social and political environment. By not participating in
these elections, they also cannot dispute the results for the simple
reason being that they refuse to monitor them.

Willingly or not, they are legitimizing Serzh Sargsyan’s election
regardless of the number of violations and fraud.

The illegality factor of the authorities is no longer a part of a
political agenda. If there is any attempt to turn the elections into
a recurrence of a political struggle, the authorities and society as
well will remind them about having chosen political self-isolation.

That means no matter how much they may want to, their efforts towards
consolidating the public would be ineffective for at least one or
two years. No one would believe them.

Elections are the only legal and constitutional way to change a
political situation and achieve power. They actually refused to use
that means. But they also can’t offer revolutionary solutions, as the
policy of self-isolation prevents them from doing so. They wouldn’t
be able to prove that Serzh Sargsyan is an illegitimate president.

Organizing any revolutionary movement without having a basis for the
president’s illegitimacy will deem their struggle, and each one of
them, unconstitutional. The government would have a right to suppress
the development of any movement and at least gain loyalty if not
support from abroad.

Thus, there could be a situation where the existence of these
political powers would be an end in itself. But the most dangerous
thing is that only the government would be able to break the deadlock
and rescue them from final marginalization. That was the case for
some political powers seemingly in the same situation, like Artashes
Geghamyan’s National Unity party, Hayk Babukhanyan’s Constitutional
Right Union, Khosrov Harutyunyan’s Christian Democratic Party and
Arthur Baghdasaryan’s Rule of Law party.

That’s why it seems realistic that after the presidential elections
some of these opposition powers might form a coalition or, at least,
collaborate with the government.

On the other hand, Armenia is not subject to any political standards
and measures, so nothing can be ruled out, no matter how fantastic.

http://hetq.am/eng/news/22353/when-the-authorities-legitimize-the-opposition.html

An Armenian Injured During The Shelling Near Aleppo University

AN ARMENIAN INJURED DURING THE SHELLING NEAR ALEPPO UNIVERSITY

14:39, 16 January, 2013

YEREVAN, JANUARY 16, ARMENPRESS: Investigations launched to clear
out the shellings orchestrated near Aleppo University found out an
Armenian was wounded. In the words of Berio National Primacy press
secretary Jirayr Reisyan the sufferer is currently in hospital,
Armenpress reports.

The injured was not a student, the accident occurred when he was on
his way to work place. Press secretary of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of Armenia Tigran Balayan noted, the injured was Sargis Petros.

Ministry Two big explosions happened on January 15 in the buildings
of engineering and art faculties, also near the student hall of
residence. Information regarding casualties is being regularly
clarified, as the hospitals constantly render new information. The
scenery of explosion is not complete yet. Notwithstanding, it was
stated that the explosion caused death of over 85 men.

Some sources report the bomb fell near the University is carried out
by the royal forces of the Government. However Syrian news agency
Sana reported that the armed group has fired two missiles in the
direction of Lirmun region.

Agreement On Information Protection Between Armenia And Kazakhstan

AGREEMENT ON INFORMATION PROTECTION BETWEEN ARMENIA AND KAZAKHSTAN

Aysor.am
January 16, 2013

At the government session today, a draft decision on approval of the
proposal to sign “The Agreement between the Government of Armenia
and the Government of Kazakhstan on Mutual Protection of Secret
Information” was submitted by the Head of the National Security
Service Gorik Hakobian to the government for approval.

The government approved the draft decision.

Azerbaijan Sharply Increases Military Spending

AZERBAIJAN SHARPLY INCREASES MILITARY SPENDING

The Associated Press
Posted: Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013

BAKU, Azerbaijan Azerbaijan’s president has announced a sharp hike
in military spending and again warned neighboring Armenia to pull
out of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh territory.

President Ilkham Aliyev said in remarks published Wednesday in state
newspapers that this year’s defense budget will rise to $3.7 billion,
up from $3 billion last year.

Annual military spending increases have taken place amid persisting
tensions between Azerbaijan and fellow former Soviet republic Armenia.

Border skirmishes are relatively common, but there has been no return
to the full-out conflict of the 1990s.

Hundreds of people gathered Saturday in the capital, Baku, in protest
at the death this month of an 18-year old conscript. Demonstrators
said he died as a result of abuse.

In remarks addressed at the domestic opposition, Aliyev warned against
smearing Azerbaijan’s army.

Subscribe to The Charlotte Observer.

Read more here:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/01/16/3791346/azerbaijan-sharply-increases-military.html#storylink=cpy

Center For Hearing-Impaired Children To Be Built In Yerevan

CENTER FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED CHILDREN TO BE BUILT IN YEREVAN

January 16, 2013 – 14:33 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – The government of Armenia will provide Yerevan My
Love Foundation with a ground area of 1005 square meters (total cost
AMD 140 million) for construction of 3 buildings in the framework of
a charity program.

The first building to house a center for hearing-impaired children
from vulnerable families will be functioning under St. Hovhannes
church. The 2nd building is meant for single mothers and their
children, while the 3rd will be allotted for the needs of clergymen.

Careless: Child Abuse, Violence Still Common In Orphanages, Boarding

CARELESS: CHILD ABUSE, VIOLENCE STILL COMMON IN ORPHANAGES, BOARDING SCHOOLS IN ARMENIA
By GAYANE ABRAHAMYAN

ArmeniaNow
HUMAN RIGHTS | 16.01.13 | 12:30

9 -year-old Tigran Papikyan, who escaped from Yerevan Childcare and
Protection Boarding Institution N1 in December 2012

A nine-year-old boy’s escape from a boarding school at the end of
last year that he later explained as the only means of getting rid of
regular beating again raised the issue of violence and indifference
that exist in Armenian child care centers and orphanages.

The boy, Tigran Papikyan, attending Yerevan Childcare and Protection
Boarding Institution N1, resorted to escape for the second time as
a desperate measure.

Child protection officer at the Armenian Ombudsman’s Office Aida
Muradyan quotes Tigran as saying that he had been beaten on a regular
basis by “Miss Lilit, who hit him on the head with a karate stick.”

While the internal investigation is on to find out whether there
were actually instances of beating or not, experts continue to argue
and confirm with evidence that violence still exists even in normal
general schools. Children at orphanages are six times as likely to
become victims of violence as their peers in families,” says former
deputy representative of UNICEF in Armenia Christina Roccella.

Many do not exclude that it is violence that had driven 15-year-old
Zina Simonyan to commit suicide at Nubarashen Boarding School No. 11
last July. The teenager fell to death from an upper-floor bathroom
window (which should have been barred).

At the same boarding in the Yerevan suburb of Nubarashen for years
a teacher sexually harassed children. Levon Avagyan stood before
court only in 2010 under pressure from society alerted to the abuse
by an activist.

1989-90 school graduates also told stories of sexual violence used
against them by the staff, in particular a group rape case that
the principal, Meruzhan Yengibaryan, was aware of and told them to
“keep their mouth shut”. But those publications did not have any
legal consequences; the principal simply resigned.

Ten orphanages and 28 other child care facilities (daycare centers,
special boarding schools) now have a total of 4,900 children, and 80
percent of them have parents or families. Most of them attend these
establishments because of facing social problems, or are ‘social
orphans’, as they are often called.

The 2010-11 report of the Public Monitoring Group on the situation
in the special education institutions of the Ministry of Education
and Science published last month also revealed different types of
violence used in 13 special schools that were monitored.

The Monitoring Group has identified not only “specific instances of
violence by the staff”, but also “informal punishment mechanisms”
used against children through other ‘privileged’ children by creating
“a hierarchical system and an atmosphere of fear between seniors and
juniors, the weak and the strong.”

“In reality the situation is terrible. In nearly all institutions all
children’s rights are being violated, but the most terrible is the
total indifference that exists,” Armine Gmyur-Karapetyan, a member
of the Monitoring Group, told ArmeniaNow.

David Amiryan, a deputy projects director at the Open Society
Foundations-Armenia (this organization has initiated and assisted the
establishment of the observation group), stresses that the bigger
problem is the level of perception of violence by executives and
educators and their failure to take preventive measures.

“It is not necessary for there to be a case of violence for them to
react. International experts point out that any evidence of a possible
case of violence should be regarded as well,” he told ArmeniaNow.

“For example, a warehouse was found at one of the boarding schools
and the door to it was opened only after a long argument. It had some
mattresses and there was the word ‘bread’, written on the wall. So far
we have no evidence of violence in this connection, but the presence
of such a facility is alarming as it may be a place for punishment,”
adds Amiryan, noting with regret that such issues could become a
deterrent, but they are neglected.

Experts more and more tend to believe that these institutions are
impossible to reform.

“Experience of many years and monitoring activities suggest that the
only correct way is bringing children out of these institutions. It is
impossible to change the educators by means of several trainings. If
the state does want to help these children, it should help their
families,” says Gmyur-Karapetyan.

Still in 2006 the United Nations launched a program aimed at reducing
the number of children at orphanages under which the state should
develop effective mechanisms for returning children to families. But
experts fear that “orphanages have become a business” and that they
are not interested in the elimination of such institutions.

Former lawmaker, member of the opposition Heritage Party Anahit
Bakhshyan believes that the problem can be solved only after corruption
is eradicated.

“If the number of children is reduced at orphanages, it will mean that
$4 million allocated for them under the state budget annually would
go to their biological or foster families, but as long as there are
people with certain interests in that circle, there will be no progress
made in this process. This is only a source of corruption, it is not
clear what percentage of the money allocated by the state is actually
spent on the child,” Bakhshyan, a veteran educator, told ArmeniaNow.

Last October, an audit conducted by the State Commission for the
Protection of Economic Competition affirmed this opinion as it revealed
that the squander of state funds in orphanages has acquired “quite
large sizes” – certain items are purchased at prices 200 percent
higher than those existing on the market and “a substantial part of
the money has not served its purpose.”

According to a UNICEF study, an orphanage or another childcare
institution annually spends nearly $4,000 per child, while a foster
family gets the funding of about $2,500 on account of each child.

Since 2008 only 21 families have provided care to orphans in Armenia,
and their number does not increase because of insufficient financing.

“Instead of the maintenance of enormous orphanage buildings, that money
should be directed to the elimination of poverty in families, which is
the main reason for children appearing in such institutions,” UNICEF
Children’s Rights Protection Officer Eduard Israyelyan told ArmeniaNow.

According to the data reported by Israyelyan, Georgia has made serious
progress in this area, as within a few years there 4,700 of 5,000
children were either returned to their biological families or placed
in care of foster families. In the absence of such possibilities
small group homes have been set up; as a result, annually the state
saves approximately $3.5 million, he added.

Deputy Minister of Labor and Social Welfare Filaret Berikyan disagrees,
saying that Armenia, too, has made “serious progress” in this regard.

But data from the National Statistical Service depict a different
situation: whereas in 2009 there were a total of 1,243 children in
orphanages, then in 2011 that number was 1,115. In 2011, only 56
children were returned to families from orphanages, while 267 were
enrolled in these facilities.

www.ombuds.am

In 2012, 42.800 People Who Left Armenia Never Returned

IN 2012, 42.800 PEOPLE WHO LEFT ARMENIA NEVER RETURNED

Factinfo
Wed, 01/16/2013 – 12:35

According to data of RA National Statistical Service about
International Passenger Traffic the arrivals and departures to and
from Armenia in the period from January to December 2012 was 2.

191.833 and 2.234.597 passengers respectively. A negative balance of
42.764 people is registered.

According to data of RA Migration Service, the number has been
decreased for 1,100 or 2,4% compared to the same period of the
previous year. The portion of the passengers of air transportation
compose 41,2 % of the overall number of passengers.

Compared with the previous year, in 2012 the number of passengers
has increases by 492,400 people or 12,5 % and was equal to 4.426.400.

A positive balance of international passengers was registered in
December, equal to 28,600 instead of the previous 21.100. At the same
time, the net of air transport passengers, unlike road and railway
passengers, registered a positive balance in December and was equal
to 29.735. The net of road and railway transportation was respectively
-550 and -575 passengers.

Petition To Open Turkish-Armenian Border Likely To Fail: Oriental St

PETITION TO OPEN TURKISH-ARMENIAN BORDER LIKELY TO FAIL: ORIENTAL STUDIES INSTITUTE DIRECTOR

YEREVAN, January 15. /ARKA/. Ruben Safrastyan, the director of
Armenian Institute of Oriental Studies, said Tuesday the petition to
call upon Turkey to open the borders with Armenia at least for the
Syrian refugees is pretty unlikely to be successful.

The activists petitioned Obama administration on the White House
website to call the government of Turkey to open its border with
Armenia for refugees from Syria. As of January 10, only 500 people
signed the petition.

“Of course, I welcome any initiative which is targeted at supporting
our Syrian compatriots. As to this particular initiative, I can say
just 5 hundred people signed it whereas 25,000 signatures are required
to be considered by the U.S. President,” Safrastyan said.

Moreover, the U.S. President will not even review this issue to avoid
disputes with Turkey. And even if we presuppose the U.S. can make
some pressure, Turkey will not fulfill the requirements.

“As a whole, such initiatives should be started after consulting with
the Republic of Armenia. Afterwards the State itself should have been
submitted the initiative,” the expert said.

Armenia and Turkey have no diplomatic relations. The border between
the two countries was closed in 1993 at Ankara’s initiative. Relations
between Armenia and Turkey remain tense because of Ankara’s biased
stance on Karabakh problem and its painful reaction to Armenia’s
efforts to obtain worldwide recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

Process of normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations started in
2008 by the initiative of the President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan. On
October 10, 2009 Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Turkey signed
two protocols in Zurich “On the regulation of diplomatic relations”
and “On the development of mutual relations” which should have been
ratified by the parliaments of both countries.

But on April 22, 2010 Sargsyan signed a decree on the termination of
the process of ratification of Armenian-Turkish protocols announcing
that Turkey is not ready to continue the launched process.

Ratification process of documents by Turkish Parliament is frozen.

Expert: Azerbaijan Tries To Divert Osce Minsk Group Co-Chairs’ Atten

EXPERT: AZERBAIJAN TRIES TO DIVERT OSCE MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRS’ ATTENTION FROM MAIN CONTENT OF KARABAKH PROBLEM

arminfo
Tuesday, January 15, 18:18

Azerbaijan’s introducing the issue of resettlement of Syrian
Armenians in the security zone around Nagorno-Karabakh in the agenda
of the meeting with the OSCE Minsk Group co- chairs is an attempt
to divert attention from the main content of the Karabakh problem,
Rouben Safrastyan, Director of the Oriental Studies Institute of the
National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, told ArmInfo.

“First of all, the matter concerns a very small number of people;
moreover, the given actions have a humanitarian nature and attaching
a political context to this issue can be qualified as Azerbaijan’s
attempt to influence the peace process in order to divert attention
from its aggressive policy”, the expert said.

He also stressed that one should not expect any active steps in the
peace process, as the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair countries and the
EU are not interested in it yet. “One should expect nothing from the
Jan 28 meeting of the Armenian and Azerbaijani foreign ministers with
the mediators in Paris”, he said.

To note, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov said that at
the Jan 28 meeting in Paris he will raise the issue of resettlement
of Syrian Armenians in the security zone around Nagorno-Karabakh.