Armenia In The List Of Countries Attractive For Foreign Retailers

ARMENIA IN THE LIST OF COUNTRIES ATTRACTIVE FOR FOREIGN RETAILERS

June 18, 2013 | 02:16

Armenia has been included in the list of the countries which are
attractive for retail investment.

A number of small countries with unique characteristics of wealth and
consumer focus are ranked in the 2013 Global Retail Development Index,
including Uruguay (3rd), Mongolia (7th), Georgia (8th), and Armenia
(10th).

The ranking issued by A.T. Kearney consulting company suggests that
Central Asia and Eastern Europe offer fertile ground for retailers.

With economic stalwarts such as Turkey and Russia improving their
standing and little “gems” such as Armenia becoming more attractive
to global players, these markets have avoided the stagnation of their
more developed Western European neighbors.

“Rising incomes and improved living standards in Armenia (10th) have
paved the way for retail growth. Armenia’s government officially
welcomes foreign investment, and several global indices rank it as
a strong place to do business,” the statement says.

Among the challenges mentioned by the experts are small population,
geographical isolation due to closed borders with Turkey and
Azerbaijan, a relatively low per capita GDP of about $5,600, and
corruption in both the official and commercial spheres.

However, it is mentioned that foreign investors have significant room
for development as supermarkets and grocery chains gradually replace
open-air bazaars and street vendors.

Top ten includes Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, China, UAE, Turkey, Mongolia,
Georgian, Kuwait and Armenia.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Prosperous Armenia Rep Speaks Of Control Chamber’s Report, Kickbacks

PROSPEROUS ARMENIA REP SPEAKS OF CONTROL CHAMBER’S REPORT, KICKBACKS, PARTY’S PLANS

19:51 ~U 19.06.13

Talking to Tert.am Naira Zohrabyan, Secretary of the Prosperous
Armenia Party (PAP) parliamentary group, commented on the recent
parliamentary debates on the Control Chamber’s report.

“I had a great temptation to ask them if they had just learnt
the budget was being plundered or the word ‘kickback’ had gained
widespread currency in Armenia’s politics. But I decided against
being drawn into the ‘reality’ debates,” Zohrabyan told Tert.am.

She disagrees with the claims that the PAP’s “strange silence” gave
rise to various comments.

“I would like to note that the party does not plan to be passive. The
MP wishing to raise a question can do so. I do not know what kind of
speeches you expect me to make, but we always voice our opinion of
all the problems,” she said.

It is common knowledge PAP has pro-Russian foreign-policy orientation.

“The PAP’s only interest is our country’s interest. I would not say
that Armenia’s other major political forces are explicitly pro-western
or pro-European irrespective of how many times [President of the
European People’s Party – EPP] Wilfried Martens praises them or how
many times a month they attend the EPP congresses,” Zohrabyan said.

With respect to PAP Chairman Gagik Tsarukyan’s statement that the
PAP intends to specify its role in Armenia’s politics, Zohrabyan said
that the party has always played a clear role.

“Yes, realignment is expected in autumn. A party that claims it has no
need for reforms cannot be considered a serious force,” Zohrabyan said.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Iranian Ambassador Invites Armenian Prosecutor General To Visit Tehr

IRANIAN AMBASSADOR INVITES ARMENIAN PROSECUTOR GENERAL TO VISIT TEHRAN

June 19, 2013 | 18:37

Armenia’s Prosecutor General Aghvan Hovsepyan on Wednesday received
Iran’s Ambassador to Armenia Mohammad Raiesi.

The sides discussed cooperation of prosecutor’s offices of two states
in their fight against crime. In this context, they noted importance
of a Memorandum on understanding signed during Iranian Prosecutor
General’s visit to Yerevan.

Iranian diplomat thanked for warm reception and invited Aghvan
Hovsepyan to visit Iran. The sides agreed to sign a Memorandum on
program of cooperation between prosecutor’s offices of two states.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Russian Arms Delivery To Azerbaijan Does Not Violate Balance Of Forc

RUSSIAN ARMS DELIVERY TO AZERBAIJAN DOES NOT VIOLATE BALANCE OF FORCES: EXPERT SAYS

YEREVAN, June 19. / ARKA /. The delivery of $1 billion worth Russian
arms to Azerbaijan will not violate the balance of forces in the
region, Sergey Minasian, an expert from the Yerevan-based Caucasus
Institute said today in interview with Novosti Armenia news agency.

According to media reports, the arms package, signed in a series of
contracts between 2011 and 2012, includes nearly 100 T-90C tanks,
Smerch and TOS-1A multiple rocket launchers and Msta-A and Vena
artillery cannons.

Minasian said the latest delivery of Russian arms to Azerbaijan is
in tune with Moscow’s traditional military-technical policy in the
South Caucasus.

“There is nothing new. Russia continues to sell arms and military
equipment to Azerbaijan at market prices, but at the same time
it supplies weapons to Armenia at discount prices and often even
virtually free,” Minasian said.

In his words, the weapons supplied to Azerbaijan at market prices are
more contemporary than those delivered to Armenia, but all kinds of
weapons, which Armenia receives, can be upgraded.

“On the other hand, the quality can be offset by quantity. In other
words, if Azerbaijan receives 200 T-90 tanks, it means that Armenia
will receive at least 300 T-72 tanks, which will be upgraded in view
of the terrain and other specifics,’ he said.

“In fact, Azeri president Ilham Aliyev is buying expensive toys to
showcase them at military parades on the eve of the next presidential
election and part of Azeris will be happy seeing these weapons and
continue to believe in fairy tale that Baku will soon begin operation
to liberate Nagorno-Karaabkh, a tale which has been said over the last
20 years. Russia is happy too because it has received about a billion,
and perhaps more,” said Minasyan.

He argued that Armenia’s leadership will also be happy because as a
result it will be able to upgrade Armenia’s tanks, artilleries and
other weapons and military equipment.

“Western partners will also be happy because the deal will spark and
intensify anti-Russian sentiment in Armenia. The organizations in
Armenia, which pursue anti-Russian policy, will also be happy because
they will get quite a favorable field for activities,” Minasian said.

“The balance of power is not breached. Long before the sale of
arms to Azerbaijan Russian and Armenian sides began the work
to preserve the balance of power along with upgrading Russian
military base in Armenian Gyumri,” he said. -0- – See more at:

http://arka.am/en/news/politics/russian_arms_delivery_to_azerbaijan_does_not_violate_balance_of_forces_expert_says/#sthash.4BSCtt7Y.dpuf

Oppositionist: West Will Take Into Account Freedom House’s Report On

OPPOSITIONIST: WEST WILL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FREEDOM HOUSE’S REPORT ON ARMENIA WHEN PROVIDING FINANCIAL AID

ARMINFO
Wednesday, June 19, 16:01

Freedom House human rights organization’s report on Armenia is
objective, but it is a political instrument for the world power
centers, Aram Karapetyan, Leader of New Times opposition party,
told ArmInfo.

He said that blaming such organizations as Freedom House or Amnesty
International for impartiality – except some insignificant faults –
is wrong. Western democracies rely on them when making decisions. The
politician believes that Freedom House’s data on Armenia fully
reflect the situation in the country. Armenia is truly a country with
semi-authoritarian regime.

“Over the last 5-6 years the authorities have been applying to the
so-called soft force, soft dictatorship. The authorities do not make
demonstrative repressions, do not fire at people or attack them with
batons. Nevertheless, there is overall soft pressure on opponents.

The public and political life is under control of the ruling regime.

Television is in the hands of the authorities. Unnecessary elements
are gradually being ousted from the political and public life,”
Karapetyan said.

Freedom House’s rating will be used against Yerevan, if necessary, for
instance, when providing foreign loans or other financial aid, he said.

Armenia proved in the category of the countries with semi-consolidated
authoritarian regime in the Nations in Transit 2013 – Freedom
House’s comprehensive, comparative study of democratic development
in 29 countries from Central Europe to Eurasia. This edition covers
the period from January 1 through December 31, 2012 and measures
progress according to the following indicators: electoral process,
civil society, independent media, national democratic governance,
local democratic governance, judicial framework and independence,
and corruption.

The democracy score of Armenia is 5.36 in the ratings based on a scale
of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress
and 7 the lowest. The Democracy Score is an average of ratings for
the categories tracked in a given year.

Along with Ukraine (4.86), Georgia (4.75) and Kyrghyzstan (5.96)
proved in the transitional category where the leaderships of Ukraine
and Georgia are qualified as ‘transitional governor or hybrid regime’
and the leaderships of Armenia and Kyrghyzstan as ‘semi-consolidated
authoritarian regime.’

Georgia Alone Cannot Permit Armenia To Use Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway

GEORGIA ALONE CANNOT PERMIT ARMENIA TO USE BAKU-TBILISI-KARS RAILWAY – GEORGIAN OFFICIAL

June 18, 2013 | 04:45

Georgia alone cannot permit Armenia to make use of the
Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, Giorgi Khukhashvili, the Georgian PM’s
economic advisor, told Armenian News-NEWS.am.

To note, an Azerbaijani Railways Company representative had recently
stated that the aforesaid railway link will be launched at the end
of 2014. And the Azerbaijani MFA had stressed its intention to block
Armenian companies from making use of this railway.

“Considering the extremely specific relations between Armenia and
Azerbaijan, the matter is truly complicated because not solely the
Georgian, but the Azerbaijani and the Turkish parties will become
the cofounders of the operators of the railway. We alone do not set
the rules of the game,” Khukhashvili noted.

Speaking about the prospects of this railway, he highlighted its
importance for Georgia and Azerbaijan, and in terms of the regional
transportation corridors.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Soviet-Armenia Exhausted: Russia Will Take What It Wants

SOVIET-ARMENIA EXHAUSTED: RUSSIA WILL TAKE WHAT IT WANTS

The news that the minister of energy and natural resources Armen
Movsisyan met with the head of Gazprom Alexey Miller and discussed a
number of issues, including on giving the government’s stake in ARG
to Gazprom has shocked the Armenian society.

Armen Movsisyan will hardly remember that he discussed such an issue
with Gazprom’s head. Movsisyan’s answers to all the questions is:
“I don’t remember.” It is not ruled out that Movsisyan did not discuss
this issue with Gazprom, which just decided that they did.

Could Armenia dismiss the rumors? Of course it cannot. The maximum
Armenia could do is to refuse to join the Customs Union and issue an
initial agreement to the Eurasian Union. Besides, Russia has done
a great favor to Armenia postponing news about the gas price until
after elections.

On the other hand, the Armenian society need not be surprised. ARG was
established with 45-45% stakes, 10% belonged to the so-called Intera
Company, Gazprom’s subsidiary, and was meant to cover up shadow deals.

Intera got out of business and at the beginning of the 2000s Gazprom
began increasing its stake in ARG.

The greater part of the Armenian society was following this process
calmly. The same calmness was there also in 2006 when Gazprom
website reported that the company boosted its assets with the help
of Iran-Armenia gas pipeline. The Armenian society was upset by the
news and did not ask the government whether it was not possible to
avoid giving the Armenian section of Iran-Armenian pipeline to Gazprom.

So, in the silence of the Armenian society and the greater part of
the political class, the stake of the Armenian government in ARG was
cut to 20% from the initial 45%. The society can protest now about
the last 20% but hardly anything will change.

Russia took the situation under control a long time ago, and it is
fulfilling its program step by step.

Trying to keep what we have or recover what we lost will take efforts
without producing results. Armenia will have to remain in the field of
concessions in its relations with Russia. The society will be powerless
to change the situation even if it forms its so-called government.

Russia will take what it wants. Armenia needs to set up all the
spheres, including energy. Russia will take whatever belongs to it,
after all the system in place has been inherited from the Soviet
times. Since independence Armenia has not formed its own system in
any sphere.

It is evident that except toasts, pathetic speeches, Karabakh victory,
nothing Armenian has been created so far, and Soviet Armenia is
only two decades old. Soviet Armenia is exhausted now. This process
will not be a tragedy if a parallel process of setting up real, new,
independent Armenia is launched.

This is possible only if the relevant social grounds are in place,
and if the political system is Armenian in essence, not an old Soviet
Russian agency.

HAKOB BADALYAN 11:14 18/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30194

Ankara: Azerbaijan And Russia-Armenia Gas Crises

AZERBAIJAN AND RUSSIA-ARMENIA GAS CRISES

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
June 16 2013

ZAUR SHIRIYEV
[email protected]

The ongoing debate in Armenia over the increasing price of natural
gas sold by Russia has had an enormous impact on ordinary Armenians,
among whom dissatisfaction is growing.

A further complication in this ongoing debate arose when the president
of the Azerbaijan State Oil Company (SOCAR) declared in an exclusive
interview with local ANSTV on June 7 that Azerbaijan will be able to
supply Armenia with gas. Following this statement, another avenue of
discussion was opened, among the political experts and politicians
in Baku seeking to explain this statement, and the terms under which
Azerbaijan is prepared to help Armenia.

To understand the link between the two developments, we need to look
closer at political-economic development in Armenia, and the full
narrative of the Moscow-Yerevan gas crisis.

Russia’s motives and Iran’s role

The price of the gas that Russia sells to Armenia was an issue in
bilateral discussions before the February presidential elections, but
the discussion did not leak into the public sphere because Yerevan
was concerned about the possible negative implications for Serzh
Sargsyan’s presidential campaign. Then in mid-May, once the rise
had already been approved, a group of civil activists held a protest
in front of the Armenian Parliament. They too were surprised at the
Armenian president’s to keep such an important decision under wraps.

Notably, President Sargsyan did not attend the informal summit of the
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), on May 28, though the
official explanation was that the meeting it clashed with Armenia’s
independence day celebration. One can argue that Russia’s motives in
this case are clear: Moscow wants to push Armenian government into
action regarding joining Customs Union, as well as the so-called
Eurasian Union initiative. On June 7, following Russia’s decision,
a big crowd protested in front of the Russian embassy in Yerevan,
under the slogan “Russia is weakening Armenia.”

We can anticipate that the country will face an economic depression
in the coming months, due to the sudden increase from the current $180
per 1,000 cubic meters to $270; ArmRusgasprom, Armenia’s domestic gas
distributor, has applied to the Public Services Regulatory Commission
of Armenia to increasing the domestic tariff from the current $316
to $374 per 1,000 cubic meters. The chairman of the Central Bank of
Armenia, Artur Javadyan, stressed that the increase will generate a
further 2-2.5 percent inflation. Considering that as of May 2013, the
12-month inflation was 5.2 percent in Armenia according to official
data, socio-economic conditions are looking bleak. At the very least,
it may lead to bankruptcy for small businesses.

Given these developments, then, it is perhaps not surprisingly that the
Iranian ambassador has told the Armenian public that Tehran is ready to
assist to Armenia in this difficult situation. In reality, however,
such assistance is impossible, at least in the short term.First,
Armenia currently buys gas from Iran under a “barter agreement” —
in exchange for gas, Armenia exports electricity.

Armenia’s existing technical capacity makes it impossible to supply
more electricity, and the Armenia-Iran high-voltage electricity
transmission line is not ready. Additionally, the Armenian domestic
energy market is controlled by ArmRosgasprom closed Joint Stock
Company, the majority of which is owned by Russian Gazprom (80
percent). The Armenian government holds 20 percent of the shares.

Therefore, the decision to buy more gas from Iran cannot be made by
the Armenian government alone, but rather by Russian energy giant
Gazprom, and thus essentially by Moscow.

Second, the price of Iranian gas under a commercial agreement would
be even more expensive than the new price of Russian gas. Armenia
buys Iranian gas at $230-235 with the barter arrangement, but the
commercial price could be between $335 and $370, (compared with $270
from Russia). The final obstacle is political; the Armenian government
does not feel comfortable buying more gas, or becoming dependent on
Iranian gas, under current international conditions. With the West
applying sanctions to Iran and the generally unstable situation there,
Yerevan would like to look for safer alternatives.

Gas crisis and Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

Azerbaijan’s offer to supply gas to Armenia was clearly the political
rather than commercial move. There are various explanations being
offered; this is my take on SOCAR’s statement:

The main reason was to gauge public opinion in both Azerbaijan and
Armenia, where the gas crisis provoked public dissatisfaction with
Russia. The majority of Azerbaijanis public were asking under what
terms the government would be ready to assist Armenia; the precondition
as stated by many politicians is the ending of the Armenian occupation
of Nagorno-Karabakh. No one is questioning the technical side of
things, i.e., whether it is actually possible to supply gas to Armenia
energy expert Ilham Shaban, from the research website Caspian Barrel,
explains the possibility from a technical point of view.

Second, Baku was motivated by a desire to stimulate the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict negotiations, which have stagnated. The
last time the Azerbaijan and Armenian presidents met was 17 months
ago, and while the two parties’ foreign ministers have met to set the
agenda for the presidential meetings, they are still working just to
schedule the meeting. It is expected that in the coming days, during
the meeting of the three co-chairs of the Minsk Group, the countries’
presidents – the US, France and Russia — will issue a joint statement
about the conflict resolution process at G8 summit.

The final reason is again political: From Baku’s vantage point,
the increasing pressure that Moscow is putting on the region, could
hurt countries that are its strategic partners, and if Azerbaijan
can actually assist Armenia, there may be development on conflict
resolution.

Obviously, it remains unknown whether Baku’s offer will be considered
by Yerevan. What is clear is that Russia’s “gas is politics” principle
remains as powerful as ever.

http://www.todayszaman.com/columnistDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=318463

Ankara: Art And Artists In Resistance

ART AND ARTISTS IN RESISTANCE

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
June 17 2013

Despite the anxiety over Gezi Park, creativity has been on watch.

Filmmakers and musicians have been voicing their concerns here and
across the globe. Creative visuals, songs and videos have been an
integral part of the protests

The pictures and videos emerging from Gezi Park for the last 18
days are, among many other things, of great contradiction to the
world trying to make sense of the protests and the clashes. The live
coverage of police brutality to protesters and civilians with tear gas
and water cannons alternate with scenes of peace and solidarity the
next day, like a piano concerto in the park where thousands watched
and applauded, including the riot police.

German musician Davide Martello carried his piano to the center of the
park on June 12 for a spontaneous performance with Turkish musician
Yigit Ozatalay. The reaction was emotional, the feelings overwhelming,
and the inspiration instant. Soon after, New York’s Zuccotti Park,
home to the Occupy Wall Street movement, had its own baby piano.

As much as the protests against the Turkish government’s increasingly
autocratic regime have been a source of angst and anxiety since its
first days, it has also been a source of creativity and artistic
inspiration. Protesters in social media have coined the term
“disproportional wit” or “disproportional creativity” in an answer to
the much-used term “disproportional violence” throughout the protests.

In the first days of the protests, pictures of graffiti, street art
and posters put smiles across faces of those across their computers,
surfing frantically on social media. Within the week, short films,
animations and videos were circulating on social media. Some of these
were the works of young, passionate amateurs, others products of
professionals who contributed to the fight for democracy and freedoms
through putting their talents in use.

If you visit the website capulcular.bandcamp.com, you’ll be able to
listen to over 80 songs written, performed and recorded during these
18 days. Some of these songs are the covers of famous songs, like
Sting’s “I’ll Be Watching You” or the rebel song from the musical
“Les Misérables,” “Do You Hear the People Sing?” with the lyrics
appropriate for the protests.

Do you hear the people sing?

But more than half of these songs are original songs, showing the
diversity of the groups that have become part of the Gezi Park protests
in Istanbul and across Turkey. You will listen to ethnic music of
Laz and Alevi, classical Turkish music, rock, electro-pop, rap and
anthems. Some of these songs were written and performed by acclaimed
Turkish musicians like the momsy doyenne of Turkish pop, Nazan Oncel,
and the rock heartthrobs Duman. Even the world-famous classical music
pianist Fazıl Say, a recent target of the government’s crackdown on
free speech, gave a concert in the Aegean city of İzmir with a pan,
a popular tool of protest of those at their homes. Many filmmakers and
actors have also become the voices of the resistance, going as far
to set up a Filmmakers’ Tent in the colorful tent city in Gezi Park
(to be broken by a raid by the police with tear gas last week). More
than 700 film professionals, including directors like Ozcan Alper,
Fatih Akın and actors like Halit Ergenc and Cem Yılmaz, as well
as 13 film associations, issued a call to the government last week,
urging for “the termination of police violence, an end to threats of
intervention and continuation of the dialogue.”

The concerned voices from the world of arts not only came from Turkey,
but across the globe. The photo of a smiling Tilda Swinton, holding
a paper that read, “Right now police is violently attacking citizens
in Istanbul,” made the rounds in social media.

To reconcile (or not) with the art world

Other messages came from acclaimed musicians Patti Smith, Joan Baez,
Roger Waters and Thom Yorke. An open letter to Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan began with, “We, citizens of the world, are deeply
saddened and concerned by the severe violence against citizens of
Turkey by the Turkish police over the last couple of days in Turkish
cities including Istanbul.” The letter was signed by American political
critic and activist Noam Chomsky, British author Hanif Kureishi,
actress and activist Susan Sarandon, British filmmaker Terry Gilliam,
among other renowned names. The ruling Justice and Development Party’s
(AKP) ignorance, disregard, and often disdain, for the arts have been
a major concern of Turkey’s intellectuals, artists, and educated,
urban citizens for some time now.

Two years ago, the prime minister had called well-known artist Mehmet
Aksoy’s sculpture in Kars, a symbol of Turkish-Armenian friendship and
reconciliation “a freak,” and asked for its demolition. Last year,
Erdogan condemned Turkish intellectuals of “despotic arrogance”
after his daughter was insulted during the staging of a play. He
threatened to cut state funding of country’s theaters, and he is
making good of his word as the funding cuts for state theaters,
ballet and opera are imminent.

So out of touch are Erdogan and his colleagues from the AKP with
the world of arts and culture, that their attempts to reach out and
reconcile became a source of joke when he invited Necati Å~^aÅ~_maz,
the leading actor of the now-canceled ultra-nationalist TV series
“Kurtlar Vadisi” (Valley of the Wolves), and the popular actress and
diva Hulya AvÅ~_ar, a public figure of indifference and insensitivity
towards women’s issues and ethnic minorities. Å~^aÅ~_maz’s lack
of coherence and poor Turkish during a televised press statement
following his meeting with the prime minister flooded Twitter with
thousands of jokes.

“World of translators and linguists unite,” said one tweet.

For AvÅ~_ar’s meeting with Erdogan, another tweet said it all,
“Imagine Obama calling Kim Kardashian to the White House after a
civil uprising.”

June/17/2013

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/art-and-artists-in-resistance.aspx?pageID=238&nID=48903&NewsCatID=385

La Permalosa Al Azhar E Il Genocidio Armeno, Prime Grane Di Bergogli

LA PERMALOSA AL AZHAR E IL GENOCIDIO ARMENO, PRIME GRANE DI BERGOGLIO

Il Foglio, Italia
11 giugno 2013

A quasi tre mesi dall’elezione, arrivano i primi problemi per Papa
Francesco con il mondo islamico. E’ al Azhar, la massima istituzione
religiosa sunnita, a far sentire la propria voce, con un comunicato
diffuso nel fine settimana dall’agenzia Mena: la ripresa delle
relazioni con la Santa Sede – si legge – dipende “dai passi positivi e
seri che devono essere adottati per dimostrare chiaramente il rispetto
dell’islam e dei musulmani”. Al Azhar fa inoltre sapere di essere
ancora in attesa della risposta al messaggio di congratulazioni per
l’elezione di Bergoglio inviato subito dopo l’apparizione alla Loggia
delle Benedizioni. I rapporti tra Roma e al Azhar sono interrotti da
più di due anni. Era il 10 gennaio 2011, pochi giorni dopo la strage
che nella chiesa dei Santi di Alessandria aveva causato più di venti
morti. Benedetto XVI, parlando al corpo diplomatico accreditato,
si appellò “ai governi della regione” affinche prendessero “misure
efficaci per la protezione delle minoranze religiose”. Troppo,
per l’imam Ahmed al Tayyeb, che definì le parole del Pontefice “un
intervento inaccettabile negli affari interni del paese”, domandando
altresì perche Ratzinger non avesse “mai chiesto la protezione dei
musulmani massacrati in Iraq”. Da allora i rapporti sono congelati
in attesa di cambiamenti ai vertici della chiesa, visto che per al
Azhar, formalmente, il problema non era il Vaticano, ma le prese di
posizione del Pontefice tedesco. Così, fino a oggi Francesco si era
ben guardato dall’intervenire sul tema, e nell’incontro di un mese
fa con il Papa copto Tawadros II aveva evitato prudentemente ogni
accenno alla situazione interna egiziana del dopo-Mubarak.

Quello di Francesco fu un discorso equilibrato e attento a evitare
ogni possibile fraintendimento, passato al vaglio della segreteria
di stato. Ma al Cairo la diplomazia non basta: i saggi di al Azhar
vogliono che sia il Pontefice in persona a compiere il primo passo
per normalizzare i rapporti. Ma sono anche le relazioni con la
Turchia a preoccupare gli uffici della curia. Tutto è iniziato il 3
giugno scorso, quando Bergoglio ha ricevuto in udienza il patriarca
armeno-cattolico di Cilicia degli Armeni, affermando che il genocidio
armeno “è il primo genocidio del secolo Ventesimo”. Immediata la
replica da parte turca, con la convocazione del nunzio Antonio
Lucibello al ministero degli Esteri e la protesta per le parole del
Papa, definite “inaccettabili”. La posizione di Francesco è però
chiara: nel 2006, celebrando il 91esimo anniversario del massacro a
Buenos Aires, invitò Ankara ad ammettere che quello contro gli armeni
fu “il più grave crimine della Turchia ottomana”, un delitto “contro
l’intera umanita”. Nessuna marcia indietro, quindi, al punto che ieri
il quotidiano turco Today’s Zaman riportava l’indiscrezione secondo
la quale il Papa vorrebbe recarsi in visita a Yerevan, capitale
dell’Armenia, gia il prossimo anno, in occasione del centesimo
anniversario del genocidio.

© – FOGLIO QUOTIDIANO di Matteo Matzuzzi

Content-Type: MESSAGE/RFC822; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-Description:

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Katia Peltekian
Subject: La permalosa al Azhar e il genocidio armeno, prime grane di Bergoglio

Il Foglio, Italia
11 giugno 2013

La permalosa al Azhar e il genocidio armeno, prime grane di Bergoglio

A quasi tre mesi dall?elezione, arrivano i primi problemi per Papa
Francesco con il mondo islamico. E? al Azhar, la massima istituzione
religiosa sunnita, a far sentire la propria voce, con un comunicato
diffuso nel fine settimana dall?agenzia Mena: la ripresa delle
relazioni con la Santa Sede ? si legge ? dipende ?dai passi positivi e
seri che devono essere adottati per dimostrare chiaramente il rispetto
dell?islam e dei musulmani?. Al Azhar fa inoltre sapere di essere
ancora in attesa della risposta al messaggio di congratulazioni per
l?elezione di Bergoglio inviato subito dopo l?apparizione alla Loggia
delle Benedizioni. I rapporti tra Roma e al Azhar sono interrotti da
più di due anni. Era il 10 gennaio 2011, pochi giorni dopo la strage
che nella chiesa dei Santi di Alessandria aveva causato più di venti
morti. Benedetto XVI, parlando al corpo diplomatico accreditato, si
appellò ?ai governi della regione? affinché prendessero ?misure
efficaci per la protezione delle minoranze religiose?. Troppo, per
l?imam Ahmed al Tayyeb, che definì le parole del Pontefice ?un
intervento inaccettabile negli affari interni del paese?, domandando
altresì perché Ratzinger non avesse ?mai chiesto la protezione dei
musulmani massacrati in Iraq?. Da allora i rapporti sono congelati in
attesa di cambiamenti ai vertici della chiesa, visto che per al Azhar,
formalmente, il problema non era il Vaticano, ma le prese di posizione
del Pontefice tedesco. Così, fino a oggi Francesco si era ben guardato
dall?intervenire sul tema, e nell?incontro di un mese fa con il Papa
copto Tawadros II aveva evitato prudentemente ogni accenno alla
situazione interna egiziana del dopo-Mubarak.

Quello di Francesco fu un discorso equilibrato e attento a evitare
ogni possibile fraintendimento, passato al vaglio della segreteria di
stato. Ma al Cairo la diplomazia non basta: i saggi di al Azhar
vogliono che sia il Pontefice in persona a compiere il primo passo per
normalizzare i rapporti. Ma sono anche le relazioni con la Turchia a
preoccupare gli uffici della curia. Tutto è iniziato il 3 giugno
scorso, quando Bergoglio ha ricevuto in udienza il patriarca
armeno-cattolico di Cilicia degli Armeni, affermando che il genocidio
armeno ?è il primo genocidio del secolo Ventesimo?. Immediata la
replica da parte turca, con la convocazione del nunzio Antonio
Lucibello al ministero degli Esteri e la protesta per le parole del
Papa, definite ?inaccettabili?. La posizione di Francesco è però
chiara: nel 2006, celebrando il 91esimo anniversario del massacro a
Buenos Aires, invitò Ankara ad ammettere che quello contro gli armeni
fu ?il più grave crimine della Turchia ottomana?, un delitto ?contro
l?intera umanità?. Nessuna marcia indietro, quindi, al punto che ieri
il quotidiano turco Today?s Zaman riportava l?indiscrezione secondo la
quale il Papa vorrebbe recarsi in visita a Yerevan, capitale
dell?Armenia, già il prossimo anno, in occasione del centesimo
anniversario del genocidio.

© – FOGLIO QUOTIDIANO
di Matteo Matzuzzi

http://www.ilfoglio.it/soloqui/18572
http://www.ilfoglio.it/soloqui/18572