BAKU: Iranian leader wants “friendship and security” with Azerbaijan

Iranian leader wants “friendship and security” with Azerbaijan
Azerbaijani TV Channel One, Baku
6 Aug 04

[Presenter] Azerbaijani Speaker Murtuz Alasgarov today met a
delegation led by Iranian President Mohammad Khatami. Then the Iranian
president delivered a speech at the Milli Maclis.
[Correspondent, over video of the meeting] Speaker Murtuz Alasgarov
spoke about the development of relations between our countries during
the independence of Azerbaijan. He stressed national leader
[ex-President] Heydar Aliyev’s exceptional services in the creation of
Iranian-Azerbaijani cooperation. He said mutual visits by the [former]
presidents of the two countries, Heydar Aliyev and [Akbar]
Hashemi-Rafsanjani, had laid a good basis for multilateral relations
between our countries. Speaker Alasgarov highly assessed the
interparliamentary ties. He spoke in detail about the Nagornyy
Karabakh problem which democratically developing Azerbaijan has
faced. He said that Azerbaijan also relied on Iran’s support for the
resolution of the problem.
At the meeting, Iranian President Khatami expressed his satisfaction
with the level of interparliamentary relations. He said that the
Caucasus was one of the most important regions in the world and that
Iran was leading a policy to maintain its interests here. He spoke
about the role of our national leader Heydar Aliyev in the development
of Iranian-Azerbaijani relations. He said that a detailed exchange of
views had been held during the meetings with Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev. He stressed that the two sides should make efforts to
ensure the signed documents are carried out. He said that Iran will do
its best to contribute to a solution to the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict
and reach a lasting peace in the region.
Then a meeting was held at the Milli Maclis. First, Speaker Alasgarov
talked about Iranian President Khatami’s visit to our country, his
life and activities.
Iranian President Khatami delivered a speech at the Azerbaijani
parliament. He highly evaluated the role of parliament in any
country’s life and stressed the importance of the laws adopted to rule
the country. He talked about the relations between civilisations. He
noted the importance of developing dialogue and mutual understanding
in this sphere. He said that the modern world needs peace and
security. He said that one-sidedness, unipolarity and the double
standards applied by many countries are unacceptable to international
policy. Khatami said that knowledge, public information and mutual
ties linked countries in the modern world to each other and that
democracy was an important factor in creating political theories. He
noted that important steps have been taken towards democracy over the
last 200 years. Khatami talked about Azerbaijani-Iranian relations and
stressed the presence of stronger potential for the development of
cooperation between our countries in the economic, political,
cultural, trade and other spheres. He shared his views about the
Caspian Sea’s environmental security and legal status. Iranian
President Khatami said that we support living with Azerbaijan in an
atmosphere of friendship and security.

Karekin II: Iran/Armenia Coop Should help All Regional Development

KAREKIN II: “ARMENIAN-IRANIAN COOPERATION SHOULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE
DEVELOPMENT OF RELATIONS IN THE WHOLE REGION”
YEREVAN, August 5 (Noyan Tapan). According to the Information System
of the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin, on August 4, Catholicos of All
Armenians Karekin II received newly appointed Ambassador Extraordinary
and Plenipotentiary of Iran to Armenia Ali Reza Haqiqian in his
residence in Etchmiadzin. The Supreme Patriarch expressed hope that
the warm traditions of cooperation with the Embassy of Iran formed
since the establishment of the diplomatic relations between Armenia
and Iran will also continue in the future. “We are sure that
Armenian-Iranian cooperation should contribute to the development of
warm relations and effective cooperation not only between the two
peoples, but also in the whole region,” mentioned the Catholicos.
Ambassador Ali Reza Haqiqian in his turn gave assurance that all his
steps will be directed at the strengthening of close and friendly
relations between the two peoples. The Ambassador also mentioned that
being from Isfahan he knows the Armenian religion and the life of the
Armenian people from childhood.

ANKARA: Armenian group declares support for Kerry in prez run

ANKARA – Turkish Daily News
5 August 2004
Armenian group declares support for Kerry in presidential run
* ‘For Armenian Americans, the clear choice is John Kerry,’ says Ken
Hachikian, chairman of the hard-liner ANCA group. ‘Senator Kerry has been a
friend of the Armenian American community for over 20 years, with a proven
track record of fighting hard for issues of concern to Armenian Americans
across the nation’
ANKARA – Turkish Daily News
An Armenian association in the United States known for its hard-line
opposition of Turkey and staunch position for recognition of the so-called
Armenian genocide, has declared support for John Kerry, President George W.
Bush’s rival in the U.S. presidential race.
A recent statement issued by the Armenian National Committee of America
(ANCA) cited Kerry’s “long record of support on Armenian American issues and
President Bush’s retreat from his pledge to recognize the Armenian genocide”
for its decision to back the Democrat candidate.
“For Armenian Americans, the clear choice is John Kerry,” the statement
quoted ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian as saying. “Senator Kerry has been a
friend of the Armenian American community for over 20 years, with a proven
track record of fighting hard for issues of concern to Armenian Americans
across the nation. He faces an incumbent, President Bush, whose record on
Armenian issues has grown progressively more disappointing throughout his
tenure in the White House,” he went on to say.
Kerry’s overtures to Armenian groups are likely to cause Turkish Americans
to become disenchanted with Kerry. E-mail messages circulating among members
of the Turkish community were calling on Turkish voters not to vote for
Kerry in the upcoming elections.
Armenians claim 1.5 million of their ancestors were killed in 1915-1918 as
part of a genocide campaign at the hands of the former Ottoman Empire.
Turkey categorically denies the claims, saying the death toll was inflated
and that the deaths occurred as the Ottoman Empire was trying to quell civil
unrest.
The parliaments of some 15 countries, including France, have labeled the
20th-century events as “genocide,” but the United States has so far
refrained from doing so, largely thanks to past administrations’ efforts. A
resolution calling for the recognition of the alleged genocide was shelved
at the last minute in 2000 after then President Bill Clinton intervened.
Bush and Kerry are in close competition for the presidency in the run-up to
the election slated for Nov. 2.
Armenian news sites have credited Kerry with labeling the 1915-1918 events
as “genocide” in a statement he issued on April 24, which Armenians say is
the anniversary of the alleged genocide.
“I join Armenian Americans and Armenians worldwide in mourning the victims
of the Armenian Genocide and I call on the governments and people everywhere
to formally recognize this tragedy,” Kerry’s statement carried by an
Armenian Internet site, Armenian Assembly of America, said.
Kerry welcomed the ANCA endorsement, stating, “John Edwards and I would like
to thank ANCA for its endorsement. We are looking forward to working with
all Armenian Americans to create a stronger America, more respected in the
world.”
“We call upon Armenian Americans to compare the respective records of
Senator Kerry and President Bush, to weigh the importance of their ballot
for the future of U.S.-Armenian relations, and to cast their vote for the
Kerry-Edwards ticket on Nov. 2nd,” added Hachikian.
ANCA praised Kerry for consistently being “a leading advocate of issues of
concern to Armenian Americans.” The statement said Kerry, as a U.S. senator,
had forcefully fought for U.S. recognition of the alleged genocide.
American Armenians were recently buoyed by a court decision last week
ordering a U.S. insurance company to pay $20 million to the descendants of
Armenians in the Ottoman Empire. The class action suit against New York Life
Insurance involved thousands of policies sold in the empire between 1880 and
1915, many of which were held by Armenians killed during the civil unrest.
The legal agreement approved by U.S. District Court Judge Christina A.
Snyder is believed to be the first ever in connection with the disputed
event.

Iran opens major free trade industrial zone in Jolfa

MENA Business Reports
August 4, 2004
IRAN OPENS MAJOR FREE TRADE-INDUSTRIAL ZONE
Jolfa free trade-industrial zone was inaugurated in a ceremony
Tuesday attended by Iran’s President, Mohammad Khatami.
The main objectives of establishing Jolfa free trade zone are to
attract local and foreign investment, create jobs, promote export and
transit of goods through the zone as well as its economy.
According to IRIB, about 250 billion Rials has been invested in Jolfa
zone, of which the private sector contributed 150 billion Rials.
The remainder was provided by Omran Jolfa Co. in two phases including
the preliminary phase such as land development as well as the
infrastructure and feasibility studies on the second phase to be
implemented in an area of 900 hectares.
In addition, a hard currency component of $ 2.5 million has been
invested in the free zone.
A fund of 307.5 billion Rials has been allocated for developing Jolfa
free trade zone in the budget for the current fiscal year by the free
trade zones high council.
With a population of 60,000, the city of Jolfa is located to the
northwest of the provincial capital of Tabriz on the common border
with the autonomous Republic of Nakhichevan and Armenia.
Speaking at the ceremony, Khatami reiterated that his government
would continue to support the development of free trade zones such as
the Jolfa FTZ.

The need for reconciliation

The Jordan Times
Tuesday, August 3, 2004
The need for reconciliation
The recent attacks on churches in Iraq belonging to Chaldean, Assyrian,
Armenian and Catholic denominations represents an ominous turn of events in
Iraq, sending the message that no one is being spared in the spiralling
chaos that is Iraq today.
The five car bombs detonated outside five churches in Baghdad and Mosul
define a new target for those fanning the flames of instability in Iraq.
This deliberate attempt to spark yet another sectarian conflict comes at the
worst possible time, when religious rivalry and tensions between the Shiite
and Sunni Iraqis have reached new heights.
There is no doubt that those behind the attacks seek to sow distrust among
all ethnic and religious groups in Iraq for the ultimate purpose of further
weakening the country and having it fall prey to their distorted aims.
The Christian community in Iraq has long been active in the society and
contributed a great deal to the country’s development on all fronts. There
are still around 800,000 Christians living in this Arab country. Many others
emigrated, seeking better living conditions. It would be a tragedy if more
Christian Iraqis were forced to flee their homeland to secure sanctuary in
Western countries.
Although Roman Catholic Chaldean Patriarch Rev. Emmanuel Delly, spoke
steadfastly about the unity of Christians and Muslims in Iraq following
Sunday’s attacks, more effort must be exerted to prevent any further attacks
on Christians and their centres of worship.
Arab governments, including the Iraqi interim government, must condemn the
recent wave of violence in the strongest possible terms. All religious
communities, especially the Muslims within and outside Iraq, should issue an
immediate warning to the attackers to stop the carnage.
It must be remembered that Iraq has been a model of tolerance and peaceful
coexistence for its Muslim and Christian communities. The worst thing that
could happen now in the Middle East is to spark religious strife between the
followers of these faiths. This would shatter all hopes for a Middle East
that is free of religious and ethnic hatred.
The faction or factions who are bent on striking Christian targets must be
stopped. This urgent objective is linked to the larger imperative of
restoring law and order in the country.
There is legitimate fear that the expanding violence in Iraq will drive the
country to madness and bloodshed. That is precisely why it is important for
clerics of all faiths and denominations to condemn such acts and urge the
perpetrators and their supporters to follow the path of reconciliation if
Iraq and the entire Middle East are to be saved from the abyss.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Authorities ban party’s pickets over Armenian officers’ visit

Azeri authorities ban party’s pickets over Armenian officers’ visit
Turan news agency, Baku
30 Jul 04
Baku, 30 July: The Baku mayor’s office has refused to authorize a
series of pickets and protest actions that members of the United
People’s Front of Azerbaijan Party UPFAP were planning to stage in
early August.
A press release issued by the party describes the actions of the
mayor’s office as a “gross violation” of the law “On freedom of
assembly”.
We should remind you that UPFAP activists were going to picket the
Foreign Ministry on 2 August and the Defence Ministry on 3 August.
Protest actions were to be staged outside the US, French, German,
Italian, Greek, Polish and British embassies on 4-13 August.
The UPFAP was going to express its dissatisfaction with the
forthcoming visit to Baku by Armenian officers to participate in NATO
exercises in September.

Lavrenty Barseghian Dispels Info re Meeting with Turkish Scientists

LAVRENTY BARSEGHIAN DISPELS INFORMATION ABOUT MEETING WITH TURKISH
SCIENTISTS IN VIENNA PUBLISHED IN “MILLIET”
YEREVAN, July 28 (Noyan Tapan). Information about the Viennese meeting
of Turkish and Armenian scientists who exchanged the documents for and
against the Armenian Genocide and about the presence of Lavrenty
Barsegian, Director of the Genocide Museum, at this meeting doesn’t
completely meet reality. Lavrenty Barseghian reported about it to the
“Marmara” newspaper, emphasizing that he didn’t leave Yerevan and,
hence, didn’t participate in the Viennese meeting. To recap, “Marmara”
reported about the meeting on July 21, referring to the Turkish
“Milliet” newspaper. In reality, according to L. Barseghian, there was
no meeting held as there were no scientists leaving Armenia. Lavrenty
Barseghian reported that he himself sent 85 documents to the Viennese
University. The documents were taken from the archives of Germany and
Austria that were allies of Turkey then. He will send another hundred
documents from the German archives to the Viennese University
soon. But there was no meeting in Vienna, because the Armenian side
doesn’t agree to make the issue “whether the Genocide had taken place
in reality or not” the subject of the discussion. Lavrenty Barseghian
said that they are sorry that they couldn’t take part in the meeting,
but the position of the Armenian side is firm. Lavrenty Barseghian
emphasized in his interview to the “Hayastany Hanrapetutiun”
(“Republic of Armenia”) newspaper that Wolfditer Bihl, a famous
historian, PhD of the Viennese University, was the initiator of the
meeting. He organized so-called Armenian-Turkish platform and
suggested that the Armenian and Turkish scientists should meet in
Vienna, previously presenting the documents regarding the 1915 events.

Ozgur Politika stresses that Turkey will become EU member …

Cyprus PIO – Turkish Cypriot Press Review
July 27 2004
Ozgur Politika stresses that Turkey will become EU member when it
withdraws its troops from Cyprus
Ozgur Politika newspaper (24.07.04) publishes a commentary by Murat
Aktas on the Turkish Prime Minister´s recent visit to France. Mr
Aktas writes, inter alia, the following: “Having conducted a
three-day official visit to France in order to seek support for
Turkey’s accession to the EU, Erdogan finalized his visit with the
purchase of 36 Airbus planes. Nonetheless, he returned to Turkey
without being able to persuade the French politicians who oppose
Turkey’s EU membership in any way whatsoever.
In addition to the purchase of the planes that will cost Turkey $3
billion, Erdogan has also given the French as a present tenders such
as the sales of certain banks and the construction of nuclear plants.
The fact that he returned from this visit as if he has won a victory
has naturally made the diplomatic circles very angry. Former diplomat
Nuzhet Kandemir compared the visit conducted by Erdogan, who
generously marketed his values, to “selling carpets in an eastern
market.” Furthermore, he firmly criticized the prime minister who
gave France the economic card in return for support in the EU.
The agreement that was signed between the AINF (Airbus Industrie No’l
Forgeard) and the Turkish Airlines at the Elysee Palace for the
purchase of five A330-200, 12 A321, and 19 A320 planes amounts to
more than $3 billion. Furthermore, in his meeting with MEDEF, French
Employers’ Federation, Erdogan also generously repeated that he is
opening the markets in Turkey, which has a population of 70 million,
to the French. Stating that in addition to the sale of certain banks,
a rapid privatization process will be initiated in the months ahead,
Erdogan gave the French the good news that certain privileges will be
given to French businessman in order to deepen the relations with
France. In his meeting with French employers, Erdogan also hinted
that Turkey will construct some nuclear plants in the period ahead.
Why did the media turn a blind eye?
Despite all this however, Erdogan was not able to persuade the
representatives of the UDF [Union of French Democracy] and the UMP
[Union for a Popular Movement], the rightist coalition parties that
oppose Turkey’s EU membership, to extend support to Turkey. UDF
Leader Francois Bayrou asserted that “Turkey does not adopt the
European culture,” while former UMP leader Alain Juppe once again
noted that Turkey will be given a conditional candidacy.
As a matter of fact, even French Socialist Party leader Francois
Hallande, who had supported Turkey’s EU membership in the past, said
to Erdogan that Turkey will become a member only if “it complies with
the Copenhagen criteria and if it officially acknowledges the
Armenian genocide.”
Despite the fact that the press featured pages and pages of reports
that noted that Jacques Chirac supports Turkey’s membership, it
failed to focus on the fact that Chirac merely extends conditional
support. Nonetheless, Chirac, who had repeated the same things over
and over again in the past, did not say anything positive during
Erdogan’s visit. In his meeting with Erdogan, Chirac once again said:
“Turkey’s integration with the EU will be desirable when it becomes
possible.” However, using a diplomatic language as usual, Chirac
avoided giving an exact date regarding when “Turkey’s membership will
become possible.” After all, he wanted to ensure that the Americans
do not snatch the tenders. Nevertheless, the French president
asserted that he extends support to the efforts made by Turkey for
becoming an EU member, rather than to Turkey’s accession to the EU
itself.
Why did Chirac, who demanded “one last effort” from Erdogan, not
understand Erdogan or why did he conceal the fact that he understood
Erdogan? Maybe Erdogan’s words were misinterpreted! And why did
Erdogan not ask Chirac the exact date for membership and the reasons
behind his remarks? Let us say that Erdogan forgot, but why did the
bourgeois media not focus on these issues and why did it applaud
Erdogan’s defeat, which was introduced as a victory?
This is because everyone very well knows that Turkey will become an
EU member when it becomes possible — in other words, when it truly
democratizes, when it acknowledges that the Kurds are the actual
founders of the republic and that they have equal rights with the
Turks, when it accepts the Armenian genocide and apologizes to the
Armenian people, and when it withdraws its troops from Cyprus.
Erdogan winked to the genocide
Meanwhile, no one is asking why in the public polls that were
conducted more than 60 percent of the French people noted that they
are against Turkey’s EU membership.
This is because 450,000 Armenians live in this country. The Turks had
massacred one and a half million Armenians and had driven the rest
away from their land. And the Armenians told and are still telling
each and every French person they live with what the Turks did to
their forefathers.
Furthermore, more than 200,000 Kurds live in France as refugees. The
Turks have been massacring the Kurds for the past two centuries. As a
matter of fact, they are still killing Kurdish youths with chemical
weapons and they are still cutting off their ears and noses. Despite
the fact that these Kurds were not able to properly explain the
nature of their problems, the French are able to follow the things
that happen to them in this age of communications. Instead of
stopping his soldiers who cut off the noses and the ears of Kurdish
youth and instead of putting Turkey in order, Erdogan is bribing the
French politicians and he is calling upon them to turn a blind eye to
all this and to extend support to Turkey. Despite the fact that they
received the tenders, the French repeated that they will not extend
support to Turkey under the current conditions.
Regardless of what anyone says, after the projects that were given to
France without even holding a tender, it is the 450,000 Armenians who
live in France and the Armenian genocide that actually sealed
Erdogan’s visit to France.
Turkey will not be able to become an EU member as long as it avoids
taking the necessary steps toward democratization, as long as it
avoids officially acknowledging the Kurdish identity and the fact
that the Kurds partners of the republic who have equal rights with
the Turks, and as long as it avoids accepting and apologizing for all
the massacres that it has conducted — from the Armenian genocide to
the Dersim genocide.”

An Ottoman epic

The Globe and Mail, Canada
July 24 2004
An Ottoman epic

By CAMILLA GIBB

Birds Without Wings
By Louis de Bernières
Knopf Canada, 625 pages, $36.95
It’s been 10 years since Louis de Bernières’s much-loved Captain
Corelli’s Mandolin was published, nine since it was honoured with the
Commonwealth Writers Prize for Best Book, and three since Hollywood
stripped it of all its charm and fervour — the very things that made
the book so glorious — and offered it up as a politically castrated
piece of wooden sentimentality. Trust Hollywood to take Kobe beef —
beer- and music-fed and massaged by loving hands — and grind it into
meat loaf.
For this, Corelli’s author and architect cannot in any way be blamed
(he neither wrote the screenplay nor cast its grossly miscast crew).
“It would be impossible for a parent to be happy about its baby’s
ears being put on backwards,” is the extent of de Bernières’s public
comment on the subject of film adaptation.
The movie, and sales of the book (on the order of 2.5 million),
parachuted him into the international spotlight, from which he
quickly averted his gaze. He bought a large Georgian rectory in
Norfolk, where he indulges his hobby of restoring and puttering about
the countryside in antique cars, has developed proficiency on several
musical instruments, and enjoys the leisure of being able to write
only if and when he feels like it.
There’s been much of the “most anticipated novel” promotional
preamble that accompanies the subsequent work of any hugely
successful author, along with a predictable tension nurtured by
critics posing the question of whether his new work can possibly
measure up. The fact is, de Bernières was already a highly successful
author by the time the world caught up with him, having written,
among other things, a much celebrated and wildly passionate trilogy
before Captain Corelli’s Mandolin. He is to be understood not as a
one-hit wonder who arrived from nowhere one year and then
disappeared, generating whispers of writer’s block for the next 10,
but as a prolific and ambitious writer with a rather astonishing body
of work, notable for its dense lyricism, fierce wisdom, soaring
passion and remarkable wit. In this tradition, Birds Without Wings is
pure de Bernières.
It may well be the case that Birds will have less mass-market appeal
than its predecessor — any novel of more than 600 pages requires the
attention and surrender of its reader, and the setting, Anatolia
rather than Greece, in the First rather than Second World War, is
less known and less familiar — but this is again a rich and
passionate story of love and war, and in many ways a much more
ambitious and important one.
Set in the small and out-of-the-way town of Eskibahce in southwestern
Anatolia, de Bernières’s novel paints an idyllic portrait of an
Ottoman town at the beginning of the 20th century. As in many other
places in the empire, Muslims and Christians have lived here together
for centuries, calling each other infidels in the same breath as they
call each other best friends and betroth their sons and daughters to
one another. Muslims pay homage to the image of the Virgin in the
church; Christians are always to be found among the Muslims stoning
to death some criminal of their faith in the public square; and the
imam and the priest engage in debate throughout the night.
De Bernières may well “do character” better than any writer alive
today: Even cats and horses and birds in his world are bestowed with
full and endearing personalities. There are the children we come to
know — the innocents who will grow up to be soldiers and war brides
and exiles and madmen — and their parents, including an imam, a
drunkard, a potter and a goatherd. Everyone has his place in this
town, as well as a voice in this book, from an Armenian apothecary to
a poor snow-bringer, an Orthodox priest, a resentful Greek
schoolteacher fighting the futile fight against the barbarism of the
Turkish tongue, a leech-gatherer, a couple of idle gendarmes, a
bird-seller and, most powerful of all, in both economic terms and in
terms of this narrative, a distinguished gentleman and wealthy
landowner named Rustem Bey.
Rustem Bey might be singled out as the closest thing to a protagonist
here. He’s a formal man, his emotional expression trapped by the
demands of his station, and one whose wife has never loved him. When
Rustem Bey discovers his wife with a lover, he promptly kills him,
then escorts her to the public square where she is stoned to
near-death by those who, in any other context, are called friends and
neighbours. Later, and with much humiliation, he buys himself a
mistress from a house of ill-repute in Istanbul. The love that
develops between them is genuine and touching, though tainted both by
Rustem Bey’s guilt about his wife, now resident and syphilitic in the
local whorehouse, and his mistress’s secret that she is actually a
Christian.
Stories of grand passions move the novel: conjugal, fraternal,
interspecies. Many are delivered in an episodic, fragmentary and
provocative manner, interspersing voices in first and third person to
create a rich, mottled chorus, an amalgam of subplots that weave and
complement each other in such a way that the town itself might be
better called the central character. One principal thread runs like a
taut current throughout: that documenting the evolution of Mustafa
Kemal, who will one day be known as Ataturk, Turkey’s great liberator
and modernizer, the founder and first president of the Republic of
Turkey.
Long before Kemal’s vision can be realized, however, Balkan wars will
be fought, during which the Russians will exterminate millions of
Muslims and drive millions more as refugees into Ottoman lands, and a
world war will occur, in which the Ottomans will naturally side with
the Germans against the Russians, but in so doing will drive out the
Armenians, who have lived among them for centuries. Ultimately, the
Ottomans and their allies will lose, the war will end, and the empire
will erupt in civil war now that the rhetoric of nationhood and
self-determination has become an intractable part of the vernacular.
The town’s people are already torn apart both by the loss of their
Muslim sons to the war effort, and the realization that their
Armenian friends and neighbours have been driven out and massacred
only several miles from home. But with Mustafa Kemal’s ascendance, a
whole new world order is about to shape their destinies. Much to
everyone’s amazement, then horror, half the town — the Christians
who have lived here for centuries — are rounded up to be relocated
to Greece, a country they have never known.
“When the committee came to value our property, none of us was very
concerned. We didn’t think we would be deported, anyway, because we
didn’t speak Greek,” says the beautiful and broken-hearted Philotei,
whose lover Ibrahim, to whom she has been betrothed since childhood,
has lost his mind to the effects of war.
“And we said, ‘We aren’t Greek, we are Ottomans,’ and the committee
said, ‘There’s no such thing as Ottoman any more. If you’re a Muslim
you’re a Turk. If you’re Christian and you’re not Armenian, and
you’re from around here, you’re Greek.’ ”
This is the story of individual fates determined by the bigger
political forces of a succession of wars, the combined effect of
which set in motion the determination and shape of borders, the
constitution of populations and the consequent civil wars and
xenophobic campaigns waged throughout Eastern Europe and the Middle
East into the present day.
Where de Bernières is critical of all sides in equal measure, his
stance on nationalism is unequivocal. It’s a “miserable stupidity”;
combine nationalism with religion, and you’ve got “unholy spouses
from whose fetid conjugal bed nothing but evil can crawl forth.” To
read de Bernières’s portrait of the town before it becomes a pawn in
this bigger play is to feel the acute devastation wrought by agendas
that lead to young men “shitting out” their entrails in trenches and
women and children being forced from their homes, only to be robbed,
raped and bludgeoned to death with rifle butts. A miserable
stupidity, indeed.
For those who do not devour it immediately, Birds Without Wings will
sit as great epics sit, on one’s shelf demanding to be read, making
one feel irresponsible and guilty, provoking resolutions of “must
read this before death.” Do read it before you die. It would be a
terrible thing to have missed a work of such importance, beauty and
compassion.
Camilla Gibb’s third novel, Sweetness in the Belly, largely set in
revolutionary Ethiopia, is forthcoming in March, 2005.

New Carrasco air terminal in Uruguay

MercoPress, Uruguay
July 22 2004
New Carrasco air terminal.
Carrasco, Uruguay’s main airport is undergoing a rapid expansion and
renewal process involving millions of dollars and with the objective
of converting it in a regional hub for Mercosur countries.

Carrasco’s air strip
The company that holds the thirty year concession of Carrasco made
this week the official presentation of the new air terminal project
that should be ready for 2009 at a cost estimate in over 100 million
US dollars.
Eduardo Eurnekian the Armenian Argentine born businessman who holds
the concession with the company `Puerta del Sur’ indicated the new
air terminal was designed and will be built by architect Rafael
Viñoly, among the world’s top rated professionals in his field of
expertise.
The new air terminal when finished will be able to handle 8 million
passengers annually.
Mr. Eurnekian who manages over 30 airports mainly in Argentina and in
Italy with Italian associates said Carrasco is `the most valuable of
our holdings and with greatest potential’, adding that the main air
strip will be extended to three kilometres.
`We expect to create a thousand jobs with the building of the new
terminal that will be a real architectural impact for the region’,
added Mr. Eurnekian.
The Armenian-Argentine investor is also the main donator of funds (an
estimated one million US dollars) for the Memorial built in the
Falkland Islands to honour Argentine combatants of the 1982 South
Atlantic conflict.