TEHRAN: Islam, Christianity enjoy perfect mutual respect in Iran: Ar

Islam, Christianity enjoy perfect mutual respect in Iran: Armenian bishop

Mehr News Agency, Iran
April 28 2007

TEHRAN, April 28 (MNA) – In an interview with Mehr News Agency here
on Saturday, the Armenian bishop in Tehran pointed out the deep ties
between various denominations of Christianity in Iran as well as
supports of the Tehran government.

Bishop Sebuh Sarkisian added that this is an indication of a perfect
mutual respect between two great religions of the country, Islam
and Christianity.

During the interview, Sarkisian noted that followers of many Christian
denominations such as Armenian, Protestant, Assyrian, Russian Orthodox
and Catholics churches live in Iran.

Statement from the Muslim Public Affairs Committee in the UK

Armenia Solidarity
British Armenian All Party Parliamentary Group
Nor Serount Publications
Tel 07876561398 or 07718982732

e-mails : [email protected], [email protected]
norserount@btconnec t.com [email protected]

Statement from the Muslim Public Affairs Committee

to:

Armenia Solidarity

British-Armenian All-Party Parliamentary Group

Nor Serount Publications

I apologise for the delay in responding to you, however before MPACUK
(Muslim Public Affairs Committee) committed to making a statement on the
Armenian Holocaust, I needed to ensure that I had done some research. To
date, the terms that can be argued or wordsmithed are genocide, crime
against humanity, ethnic cleansing and Holocaust – MPACUK will not be drawn
into a debate about semantics. What happened to the Armenians was all of the
above.

I am sorry that I missed the Memorial Day. In fact I would like to clarify
that statement and say ‘our’ memorial day as the horrific genocide that was
inflicted on the Armenian is a crime against humanity, and as brothers in
humanity, MPACUK extend the hand of condolence for your peoples’ suffering.
You deserve the recognition and the support of everyone including the
Turkish people who have to accept that a crime was committed in their name
against a vulnerable minority whose only sin was to be born Armenian in
(what is now) Turkey.

Quite correctly you have noticed that the British Government have hedged and
fudged their condemnation of the first Holocaust, and prevaricated due to
?insufficient evidence’ as a smoke screen not to offend Turkey as a powerful
member of NATO. However it is not in Turkey’s interest to deny its past, and
neither is it in the interest of justice to put the onus of proof on the
victims. Historians are prone to be political animals, however History has a
compelling force of making the truth known, warts and all.

Without ruining the tone of the email, MPACUK does not accept that this was
a Muslim crime, or a crime done in the name of Islam. It was done by evil,
sadistic human beings who unfortunately transcend religion, race, sexuality
and even humanity.

I hope this email is clear and unambiguous and reflects MPACUK’s position on
the tragic fate of so many Armenians.

Regards

ANKARA: The Trouble With Liberal Intellectuals

THE TROUBLE WITH LIBERAL INTELLECTUALS
Gunduz Aktan, Radikal

Turkish Daily News , Turkey
April 25 2007

What Others Say

"Participants of April 14 meeting are fascists and racists. They
invent fears; they dare to protect the Republic but it is neither
in danger nor under threat. When fears reach the level of paranoia,
some slaughter Christians in Malatya to save the country," etc.

According to such analyses of the individuals who name themselves
as "liberal intellectuals," to defend the Republic and its founding
principles is fascism. In fact, they would call the Chief of General
Staff and the President fascists, but they have cold feet. They
indirectly accuse others who share the same view for fascism.

At the same time, these liberals express proudly that they are not
nationalists, for old-fashioned nationalism creates enemies both
inside and out as it causes society to turn inward. Therefore,
basic characteristics of nationalism such as national identity,
national interest and national honor mean nothing to them. Namely,
entities at stake are worthless for them and that lies under their
being daredevils.

They have no fears if secularism and singularity principles of the
Republic would be damaged. These principles, they think, prevent
integration of religious groups with the system and solution of the
"Kurdish issue" in democracy. These people are in favor of political
organizations of religious and ethnic communities and some sort of
a Kurdish-Turkish federation, in line with multi-cultural liberal
democracy.

Their dream of a Second Republic:

Isn’t this the reason behind their stance for "The Second Republic"?

They think that if Turkey wouldn’t have its foreign dynamics based on
EU, it would fail to stand alone with the presence of internal dynamics
only, let alone its development. For this reason, they even do not
understand why it is feared to accept "all" EU demands. They think
EU does not have racist prejudices, double standards and excessive
demands towards Turkey.

These liberals are not frightened by the formation of a Kurdish
state in north of Iraq. For them, Turkey should not intervene in
northern Iraq in accordance with the U.S. demands. Instead, Turkey
should establish high-level dialogue with Kurdish administrators and
recognize the reality of Kurdistan, issue an amnesty for the Kurdish
Workers’ Party (PKK) terrorists and introduce some regional rights
to southeastern part of the country similar to that of northern Iraq.

For them, Cyprus has no strategic value at all. "We" are the guilty
part for the deadlock on the Island anyways. They are not scared
that unilateral approval of the Annan Plan would cause us to lose
the ground. Their encouragement stems from that they do not know
loses as gains in foreign politics occur as a result of incremental
developments in a long period.

They also defend that we should not be afraid to accept unjust Armenian
allegations and that to face up with our history will promote our
democracy.

By not taking into consideration how Far East countries such as Korea
and China rule globalization for their interests, these people side
with opening our economy to all external influences with "no fears"
for the sake of integration with the world economy. The outcome does
not affect their lives anyway.

Their alliance with the AKP:

Unfortunately, everything that they are not scared of is the source
of rightful and legitimate fears in the rest of the society. However,
the real reason affecting the society negatively is not that what
liberals are not frightened, but are frightened.

These liberals are so much in the trajectory of Justice and Development
Party (AKP) that they are even afraid of real democracy where deputies
are elected by the people not the leader and the deputies who are
not under immunities and whom their finances are audited.

However, what they really fear is a Turkey rising on its own, leaning
on the power of the nation only, showing the will to solve problems
on its own and going after an ideal of contemporary independence. In
short, at the center of their fears lies the probability of Turkey
and Turks having a strong national identity.

They quickly accept the differences of others. They are even against
Turkishness being a supra-identity beyond ethnicity. They are trying
to spoof constitutional citizenship as identity.

Those who do not own any national identity think the others are
"fascists". Then, there is possibility that the others might think
of them as "traitors".

Turkey And The Armenian Genocide: Contemporary Reflections

TURKEY AND THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE: CONTEMPORARY REFLECTIONS
by By Dr. Harry Hagopian

April 24 2007

Today, on 24th April, Armenians will commemorate the 92nd anniversary
of the Armenian Genocide. They will remember their forbears – well
over one million Armenian men, women and children – who were killed
in various odious ways by Ottoman Turkey under cover of WWI.

The serious academic world is well beyond ‘researching’ the Armenian
Genocide. Many international associations and individual experts
specialising in the history let alone psychology of genocide have
established time and again the unarguable veracity of this event.

However, the modern-day Turkish establishment and its cohorts continue
relentlessly to deny this genocide with rehearsed and glib arguments
that are truly farcical were they not also shameful. Simply put,
Armenians were almost wiped off the Ottoman map during the period 1915
till 1923 in a dual policy that blended a Turkish Ottoman desire for
dominion over a pan-Turkic region with vengefulness for its bitter
defeat in WWI. One need only read Donald Bloxham’s thoughtful The
Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism and the Destruction
of Ottoman Armenians or Taner Akcam’s trenchant A Shameful Act:
The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility
that uses Ottoman Turkish state documents and contemporary Turkish
statements to corroborate that the genocide against Armenians was
a gripping historical reality. The city of Trabzon for example,
where Hrant Dink’s killer purportedly originated from, is simply one
example amongst countless others of "killing members of a group" or
"deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to
bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part" (according
to Art II [a] & [c] of the Genocide Convention 1948) where Turkish
authorities in 1915 herded thousands of Armenians on boats, set them
off into the Black Sea and later drowned them with sheer impunity.

Given this sobering reality, I believe that Turkish contemporary
refusal to admit the guilt of its predecessor regime of the crime of
genocide is due in part to a psychological phenomenon of individual and
collective defensiveness against the perception of being accused by its
enemies (Armenians) and by its non-friends (supporters of the Armenian
efforts for recognition). As was written in an editorial I read only
last week, if Turkey were to be candid about its past rather than hide
behind threats, intimidation and obfuscations, it would recall that the
Sultan tried to distance himself in 1916 from the actions of the CUP,
the ‘state within the state’, and reassured the British Government
that the perpetrators of those egregious crimes would be punished –
as was the case with the four trials whose proceedings were included
in the government gazette.

Today, this phase of denial intensifies once more despite the
encouraging initial steps adopted by Turkey when negotiations for its
possible accession to the EU started formally in 2005. Now, however,
instead of moving forward, Turkey shows perceptible signs of regression
as it passes laws such as Articles 301 or 312 of the Turkish Penal
Code that have prosecuted Turks and non-Turks alike, those living
in the country or abroad, either for "defaming Turkishness" or for
"insulting Ataturk". Those who have suffered the brunt of such
laws include the likes of Orhan Pamuk, Perihan Magden, Murat Belge,
Ismet Berkan, Hasan Cemal, Elif Safak, Semih Sokmen, Ibrahim Kaboglu,
Baskin Oran, Halil Altindere, Murat Pabuc, Eren Keskin, Ragip Zarakolu,
Ahmet Onal, Fatih Tas, Rahmi Yildirim, Erol Ozkoray, Osman Tiftikci
and Sirri Ozturk, Osman Pamukoðlu, EU Commissioner Joost Lagendjik,
HH Karekin II, Michael Dickinson, Ipek Calislar, Abdullah Dilipak
and Mehmet Sevki Eygi, Yalcýn Ergundoðan and Ibrahim Cesmecioglu,
Attila Yayla, Belma Akcura, Cuneyt Arcayurek, Tuncay Ozkan, Taner
Akcam, Attila Tuygan and Mehmet Ali Varýþ. In fact, merely defining
the Armenian deportations in 1915 as "genocide" is interpreted as
"defaming Turkishness". One such instance occurred when Erhan Akay was
convicted to five months of prison for his article in Cagri entitled
Time to Confront the Armenian Question After 90 Years.

But it is even more disgraceful in the institutional politics of denial
pursued by Turkey when international organisations that are meant to
uphold International law and speak out against genocide kow-tow to the
political pressures of denial. I cite here how the UN, under its new
leadership, bowed recently to Turkey’s demands and blocked a scheduled
opening of an exhibition at UN headquarters commemorating the 13th
anniversary of the Rwandan genocide solely because it had mentioned
the mass murder of the Armenians. Ankara was offended by a sentence
that explained how genocide came to be recognised as a crime under
international law: "Following World War I during which one million
Armenians were murdered in Turkey, Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin urged
the League of Nations to recognize crimes of barbarity as international
crimes." The British-based organisers of this exhibition were willing
to omit the words "in Turkey", but this was clearly not enough for the
UN aficionados, and the exhibit has been put on hold. Nearer to our
own European shores, I also cite the [heretofore successful] Turkish
pressures exercised over Germany, as current President of the Council
of the European Union, to remove the case of the Armenian Genocide
as an illustrative example (the other two are the Jewish Holocaust
and Rwandan Genocide) for a pan-European law that is currently being
drafted to outlaw genocide denial in all twenty-five EU countries.

When will Turkey decide to follow a post-nationalist attitude
to history? When will it realise that every time it strives to
curtail any discussion of the Armenian Genocide, it only draws wider
attention to the subject and links today’s Turkey with the crimes
of its predecessor regime? When will certain elements within Turkish
society realise that their campaign of vilification, libel, lies and
smut on different Internet websites against prominent Turkish and
foreign scholars or journalists the likes of Taner Akcam, Robert Fisk
or Mike Joseph is not only scurrilous but depicts Turks in the least
favourable light? Should Turkey not underline – rather than undermine –
its Eurocentric credentials as it seeks to join the EU fold?

Indeed, it should revise the Turkish Criminal Code and stop applying
its Anti-Terror Law (TMY). It should also stop confiscating books,
suspending or trying writers, journalists, publishers, intellectuals,
translators and human rights activists, muzzling the press and
discriminating against its different minorities instead of protecting
them.

Once those rudimental changes are implemented and begin to take
root, when Turkish judicial chauvinism expires, and when the Turkish
establishment listens to some of its own academics and comes clean on
the genocide by recognising it, Armenians would then express their
responsibility by showing a necessary measure of soul-searching and
dealing politically with their ninety-two-year-old emotional pain.

Who knows, such a devolution might well lead toward neighbourliness
let alone prosperity and ultimately forgiven friendships between
Armenians and Turks – as was the case largely before the heinous
pogroms of the late 1800’s and the subsequent genocide.

–Boundary_(ID_KNVRuOqzCz8mu9pSpql5cw)- –

www.newropeans-magazine.org

A Rally To Take Place Near Turkish Embassy In Tbilisi With Demands T

A RALLY TO TAKE PLACE NEAR TURKISH EMBASSY IN TBILISI WITH DEMANDS TO RECOGNIZE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Yerkir
23.04.2007 17:29

YEREVAN (YERKIR) – In connection with the 92nd anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide today in the evening the Armenian Cooperation Center
of Georgia (ACCG) organizes a peaceful protest with torches entitled
"Flames of remembrance and struggle". The protest will be held at
the Turkish Embassy in Tbilisi, Georgia.

On April 24, 2007, at 11.00 a.m., the Diocese of Armenian Apostolic
Church in Georgia will hold ecumenical memorial service in honor
of the victims of the Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Empire in 1915 –
1923. On April 24, 2007, at 2.00 p.m., by the initiative of ACCG a
peaceful demonstration at the Turkish Embassy in Tbilisi will demand
recognition of Armenian Genocide.

On April 24, 2007, at 4.00 p.m., in Tbilisi State Armenian Drama
Theater after Petros Adamyan, a mourning evening dedicated to
the memory of the victims of Armenian Genocide will be organized
by the administration of the theater and the Union of Armenians of
Georgia. During this event ACCG will hold an exhibition of documentary
photos on Armenian Genocide.

Also, an exhibition of children paintings entitled "We remember and
we fight for peace" with participation of all Armenian and some
Russian schools of Tbilisi will be displayed. Representatives of
other communities and public organizations of Tbilisi are scheduled
to participate in the events.

Efforts Are Rising To Get The U.S. To Recognize The Deaths Of 1.5 Mi

EFFORTS ARE RISING TO GET THE U.S. TO RECOGNIZE THE DEATHS OF 1.5 MILLION ARMENIANS
Tammy Krikorian, Tribune

East Valley Tribune, AZ
April 24 2007

When my great-grandparents left their Ottoman Empire home for America
in 1913, it was to escape a pending genocide that would claim the
lives of their entire families.

Today marks the 92nd anniversary of the start of the Armenian genocide
that killed 1.5 million and forced an additional 500,000 through the
desert and away from their ancestral homeland.

Lessons from the first genocide of the 20th century remain relevant
today, as a modern-day genocide ravages the Darfur region of Sudan,
and as the Turkish government continues to deny the crimes committed
against Armenians in its Ottoman past.

A Christian minority in the Ottoman Empire, Armenians suffered
massacres beginning in the mid-1890s, but the genocide is considered
to have begun April 24, 1915, when more than 200 Armenian leaders
were arrested in Istanbul and sent to join hundreds more in prison.

The majority were executed.

Over the next eight years, the Armenians were driven from the land
they called home for centuries and sent on a death march through
the Syrian desert. In what the Ottoman Turks called a deportation,
Armenians were forced from their homes and raped, robbed and tortured
along the way. Many who were not killed starved to death. The course
of the Euphrates was changed for a hundred yards because of thousands
of bodies lying dead in the river.

In his memoir, U.S. Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire Henry Morgenthau
Sr. wrote, "When the Turkish authorities gave the orders for these
deportations, they were merely giving the death warrant to a whole
race; they understood this well, and, in their conversations with
me, they made no particular attempt to conceal the fact. … I am
confident that the whole history of the human race contains no such
horrible episode as this."

While the Armenian genocide has been well documented, the United States
government has yet to recognize the atrocities as a genocide in order
to protect its diplomatic relations with Turkey. Turkey continues
to deny a genocide occurred, and under Article 301, it is a crime to
"denigrate Turkishness."

When journalist Hrant Dink, a Turkish citizen of Armenian descent,
was assassinated in January, most Turks assumed it was because Dink
condemned the mass killings of Armenians. As thousands of Turks
took to the street to protest the shooting and promote freedom of
expression, Armenians around the world were hopeful that attitudes
in Turkey are changing.

But the Los Angeles Times reported last month that there has been
a backlash against Turkey’s intellectual community following Dink’s
assassination.

"Shadowy nationalist groups have issued chilling threats against
authors and thinkers who, like Dink, speak out against Turkey’s
official denial that the mass killings of Armenians beginning in
1915 constituted genocide, or on the power of the Turkish military,
or the status of minority Kurds," the article said.

Prominent Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk was tried in 2005 for
insulting Turkishness after he told a Swiss newspaper "30,000 Kurds
and 1 million Armenians were killed in these lands, and nobody but me
dares to talk about it." The charges were dropped on a technicality,
and in 2006 Pamuk became the first Turkish writer to win the Nobel
Prize in literature.

As Turkey continues to stifle freedom of speech and expression,
it only hurts itself. On one hand, it makes the nation’s efforts to
join the European Union more difficult. On the other, when prominent
Turks are charged, it brings international attention to the issue and,
hopefully, sparks dialogue among Turkish citizens about the genocide.

Adolf Hitler, on ordering his military commanders to attack Poland
without provocation in 1939, dismissed objections by saying "(W)ho,
after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"

The Armenian genocide must be recognized, to honor the memory of
those who died, to help stop the genocide in Darfur, and to prevent
similar atrocities from being committed in the future.

The first step is to urge your senators and congressmen to sponsor
Senate Resolution 106 and House Resolution 106, which asks the
president "to ensure that the foreign policy of the United States
reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity concerning issues
related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and genocide documented
in the United States record relating to the Armenian Genocide, and
for other purposes."

The full text of the resolution is available online at

Today, the local chapter of the Armenian Youth Federation is holding
a March for Humanity beginning at 3 p.m. in Patriots Square Park
at the corner of Central Avenue and Washington Street in Phoenix,
ending at the state Capitol.

Following the march, a remembrance program will be held at 4:30 p.m.
at the Wesley Bolin Plaza.

www.anca.org.

NAIROBI: Are Arturs ‘Clones’ Of 1988 Brothers? How Magharian Brought

ARE ARTURS ‘CLONES’ OF 1988 BROTHERS? HOW MAGHARIANS BROUGHT DOWN A MINISTER

Kenya Times, Kenya
April 22 2007

INVESTIGATIVE KENYAN journalists, Police and Intelligence agents will
be interested to hear of (or be reminded about) the very heavily
documented case of a second set of Armenian brothers bearing the
surname Magharian who as long ago as 1988 precipitated the biggest
corruption, drugs, gold and gunrunning money-laundering scandal in
Switzerland’s post-World War II history and in the process caused the
downfall of the then Swiss Minister for Justice, Police and Customs,
Mrs Elisabeth Kopp.

Barkev Magharian was 35 and his brother Jean 44 in 1988 – which would
make them 54 and 63 years old respectively today – when they were
arrested and jailed and Mrs Kopp, aged 52 at the time and scheduled
to succeed to the Swiss Presidency in 1990, lost her job.

Artur Margaryan (note the difference in the spelling of the surname)
and Artur Sargasyan are the two Armenian brothers whose antics in Kenya
have not dissimilarly been linked to underworld activity, including
massive amounts of unaccounted-for cash, weapons caches, paramilitary
gear and raids and sensational allegations that touch on the integrity
and reputations of a number of high ranking personalities, including
Cabinet ministers.

The Arturs claim to be aged 33 and 36 this year and so would have
been 14 and 17 in 1988.

It would be interesting to find out whether the Magharians and the
Margaryans have known each other and, or are related in any way. Also
intriguing is the very real possibility that the younger set of alleged
Armenian brothers in fact merely apes the international exploits of
the 1980s of Barkev and Jean – to the point of impersonating them
and offering their legendary services to unsuspecting "clients".

Emerging evidence would seem to point at the probability that whoever
brought the Margaryans to Kenya for whatever reason – good, bad,
mad or dangerous – was massively hoodwinked into thinking that he or
she was retaining the world-famous services of the Magharian brothers.

For the two Arturs do not feature anywhere on the radar of open-source
Intelligence, police, media or Internet resources, including the
Google search engine’s more than eight billion pages of data, images
and graphics, before they turned up in Runda, Nairobi, Kenya.

It would also be instructive to find out whether international
confidence tricksters from Armenia, a wretchedly poor country of only
3 million people which has a Diaspora (4 million) that is larger than
the homeland population, specialise in passing themselves off as pairs
of brothers in much the same way that Nigerians, for instance, are
known to have patented some scams. Two sets of Armenian brothers with
echo-chamber surnames 20 years apart specialising in what looks like
an underworld template perfected in their Diaspora, right down to a
fondness for highly controversial special arrangements at international
airports, is too much of a coincidence.

It will be interesting to hear from the voluble Arturs on the
subject of Barkev and Jean Magharian, especially why there are so
many parallels in their sagas.

Intensive research into the large literature on economic crime, drug
dealing, gunrunning and money laundering, both print and online,
comes up with no mention of the Margaryans – before they came to
this country – who have so mesmerised sections of the Kenyan media
and consumers of their content.

However, a single reference in the formidably well-researched 1999
book Patriots & Profiteers, subtitled On Economic Warfare, Embargo
Busting and State-Sponsored Crime, by R. T. Naylor, is hugely
intriguing and may in fact provide the key to the seeming mystery
of the two Arturs and their antics in Kenya. It is about the truly
extraordinary exploits of almost 20 years ago of the second set of
Armenian brothers named Magharian.

In Part Six, Chapter 16, under the heading "Trouble on Oiled Waters,
Arms and the Ayatollah", on pages 235 and 236 of the paperback
McClelland & Stewart Inc (M&S), the Canadian publisher’s edition,
Naylor narrates:

". . . A year before that arrest, an Armenian from Turkey had
purchased a ticket on a Pan Am flight from Los Angeles to Europe and
attempted to check in two large suitcases, only to face a demand for
overweight luggage charges. After a brief altercation, the man agreed
to pay. But his belligerence had stamped his face in the ticket agent’s
memory. When she saw him, a few minutes later, buying a ticket for
a Europe-bound KLM flight, she was alarmed. However, in his checked
luggage police found not a bomb but $2 million in small bills from
the local cocaine trade. The courier confessed that the money was
destined for a Zurich money-changing firm run by two Armenian brothers.

When, the next year, the police at the Italian-Swiss border arrested
. . . traffickers with [a] truckload of morphine and heroin, they
found a business card bearing the same names.

The Magharian brothers had begun business in Aleppo , moved to Beirut
because of Syrian exchange controls, then shifted during the Lebanese
civil war to Switzerland . There they came under the sponsorship of
Mohammed Sharkachi, whose firm of bullion and exchange dealers had
four marks of distinction. It had created a small gold bar especially
popular among Middle Eastern smugglers; it had sold the CIA at least 25
million Swiss francs worth of Afghan and Palestinian currency at black
market prices to make its Afghan war budget go further; it had briefly
welcomed as a client a Turk who later fled Switzerland just ahead of
an arrest warrant for heroin trafficking in the Pizza Connection case;
and it had a prominent, politically connected vice-president who had
intervened to get the firm’s bank accounts unfrozen after the identity
of that client had been revealed.

Mohammed Sharkachi was also a man with a conscience when it came to
assisting fellow refugees in Lebanon . He had lent the Magharians
use of his courier network, which had direct access to the tarmac at
Zurich airport without passing Customs; gave them a start-up loan;
and provided introductions to the big Swiss banks. It was more than a
labour of love. The Magharians were the largest Swiss recipient of the
masses of banknotes smuggled via Bulgaria from Istanbul’s ‘Takhatele
Central Bank’, while Sharkachi’s firm was one of the main suppliers
of the gold being smuggled back into Turkey along the same route.

When news of the investigation reached the Swiss Minister of Justice
and Police, she telephoned her husband, the vide-president of the
Sharkachi firm, to advise him to resign in a hurry, precipitating
the greatest political scandal in Switzerland’s post-war history and
costing her her job."

It would be intriguing to find out whether the very definitely
Big League Magharian brothers who brought so much scandal to First
World Switzerland are related in any way, even merely as members
of the same mob, to the Armenian brothers who now style themselves
Margaryan and have brought such an embarrassing circus to Kenya. What
is most likely the case is that the Arturs have based themselves on
the Magharian brothers and probably pass themselves off as that Big
League pair to unsuspecting "clients". If this is indeed the case,
then a number of very high ranking and well-connected Kenyans who
failed to do their international homework have been taken on a huge
ride. And the tragedy of it all is that the con continues. . .

Meanwhile, the following are a selection of contemporary news and news
analysis reports of the late 1980s scandal of the Magharian brothers
and the Swiss Cabinet minister. A New York Times report datelined
December 18, 1988, and headlined "Out of the Cabinet" observed:

"In Switzerland, where women were not granted the right to vote in
national elections until 1971, Elisabeth Kopp has been a pioneer. She
was the first woman to enter the seven-person Swiss Executive, known
as the Federal Cabinet, in 1984. A recent poll named her the most
popular Cabinet member, and under the country’s rotating executive
system, she was to become Vice President in February and President in
1990. But last week the 52-year-old Mrs. Kopp resigned as the Minister
of Justice and the Police. The reason: She had advised her husband,
Hans, to resign from a company that was later disclosed to be involved
in a money-laundering investigation. Attributing her resignation to
‘unbearable pressure’, Mrs. Kopp said, ‘I wouldn’t like one to think
that I could have committed or tolerated wrongdoing.’~R

Seyyed Mehdi Sahraeean, an Iranian scholar from Shiraz once popular
among the young generation of Iranian elites and students, alleged
that an independent investigation of the Magharian-Kopp scandal
indicated that 80 per cent of the judges of the Swiss Supreme Court
were on the payroll of the Medelin and Cali cocaine cartels.

Time, the global weekly newsmagazine, in its Monday, April 24, 1989,
story on the Swiss scam, headlined "Crackdown on the Swiss Laundry",
by Christine Gorman, said: "Behind every successful drug syndicate
lies a complex mechanism for recycling bundles of tainted cash
into respectable assets. But until two years ago, when Los Angeles
narcotics officers seized three Zurich-bound suitcases stuffed with
$2 million in currency, there was little hard evidence to implicate
the venerable granite-walled banks of Switzerland in such schemes.

Since then Swiss banks have been chastened by the disclosure that their
accounts were used in a billion-dollar money-laundering operation. The
resulting political scandal, in which the Justice Minister was forced
to resign, ranks as the worst in modern Swiss history.

In response, the Swiss government has promised to draft tough
anti-laundering legislation by mid-May. Last week the federal banking
commission announced that it will introduce stiff regulations on
bank-note trading to prevent drug traffickers and other criminals from
using the country’s famed secret bank accounts. The commission also
published a 28-page report that faulted Credit Suisse, which handled
the bulk of the money in the billion-dollar scheme, for inadequately
supervising its accounts.

Money laundering is not a crime in Switzerland unless it can be
shown that the cash flows from criminal activities. Yet Switzerland
is a magnet for money launderers because of its legitimate
multibillion-dollar trade in foreign bank notes. As much as 3,000
lbs. of foreign currency arrives daily at Zurich’s Kloten airport.

Much of the cash represents earnings from tourism, which each country’s
banks exchange for local currency. Swiss authorities are investigating
charges that Lebanese currency dealer Barkev Magharian, 35, and his
brother Jean, 44, both of whom are now in custody, took advantage
of that market by laundering around $1 billion, a sum that allegedly
included drug profits. At least some of the proceeds were reportedly
sent back to drug kingpins in Los Angeles.

In a report last year on the money-laundering affair, Swiss Federal
Prosecutor Dick Marty mentioned the Zurich currency-dealing firm
Sharkarchi Trading. The company denies any involvement in money
laundering. Shortly before publication of the prosecutor’s report,
Hans Kopp, a prominent Zurich lawyer and husband of Justice Minister
Elisabeth Kopp, resigned his positions as a director and vice-chairman
of Sharkarchi. Mrs. Kopp later resigned after admitting that she had
warned her husband of the impending scandal. A criminal probe will
determine whether she violated official strictures of secrecy. The
laundering affair has focused attention on the need for other Swiss
banking reforms. One possible target: the absence of requirements
for full, consolidated financial statements.

Most Swiss banks use evasive but perfectly legal bookkeeping
thateliminates disclosures about the performance of parts of their
holdings. What remains to be seen is how vigorously the banks will
defend themselves against the reform wave and whether their reputation
for probity and prudence will survive the fray.

The August 16, 2002, issue of Executive Intelligence Review tied Mrs
Kopp’s husband to, among other things, the Bank of Credit and Commerce
International affair, an international scandal that also impacted on
Kenya, where BCCI had branches, when it observed:

"… On GeoPol’s board sits Elizabeth Kopp (nee Ikle, a cousin
to Pentagon eminence grise Fred Ikle), former Justice Minister of
Switzerland. She was forced to resign in 1988 after she was caught
tipping off her husband, Hans W. Kopp, to an ongoing Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) narcotics money-laundering investigation targeting
the company Shakarchi Trading, on whose board Hans Kopp sat. Kopp,
with Alfred Hartmann of the Swiss branch of the London Rothschild
banking house, was also implicated in the scandals of the Bank of
Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) and BNL. Both BCCI and BNL
were involved in massive illicit arms trade, drug money-laundering,
financing of terrorism, and Intelligence operations."

For those who may be interested in further research, Mr Naylor has
the following reference-packed footnote:

Pierre Auchlin and Frank Garbely, Contra-Equete, Lausanne: 1990,
Chapter 2; Le Hebdo,11/11/88, 15, 29/12/88, 19/1/89, 2,16/3/89,
Le Monde, 21, 26/2/90; Daniel Zuberbuhler, Enquete de la commission
federale des banques dans l’affaire Magharian/blanchissage d’argent
"Libanon Connection", Bern: Weltwache, 1989; Catherine Duttweiler,
Kopp & Kopp: Aufsteig und Fall der ersten Bundesratin, Zurich: 1990.

The minister [Mrs Elisabeth Kopp] was fully absolved (Le Monde,
2/2/92, 5/5/92).

Big Crowds and High Spirits at Heritage Town Hall Meeting

PRESS RELEASE
The Heritage Party
31 Moscovian Street
Yerevan, Armenia
Tel.: (+374 – 10) 53.69.13
Fax: (+374 – 10) 53.26.97
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Website:

April 21, 2007

Big Crowds and High Spirits at Heritage Town Hall Meeting

Yerevan — Today, the large government hall on Melik Adamian Street
overflowed with Heritage supporters who had come to heed the party’s
plan for Armenia.

The traditional singing of the national anthem was followed
by introductory remarks by Yerevan State University professor
Vardan Khachatrian and school principal Anahit Bakhshian. Raffi
K. Hovannisian, the president of Heritage, then took the floor. In his
keynote speech (the original Armenian version of which is attached),
Hovannisian outlined the domestic and international challenges facing
Armenia and submitted Heritage’s proposal for change and progress. "We
have come here today not to make successive promises, but to establish
and authenticate the rule of right through a contract with Armenia,"
he said. Inspirational words were also heard from human rights attorney
Zaruhi Postanjian, Armenia’s first obmbusdman Larisa Alaverdian, world
boxing champion Israel Hakobkokhian, and other citizens. In the end,
Vardan Khachatrian read and responded to questions from the maximum
capacity audience.

Also today, in preparation for "keep the vote" missions scheduled for
May 12, Heritage representatives and volunteers underwent their first
training session. The training was conducted by Armen Martirosian,
Heritage’s representative at the Central Election Commission.

Founded in 2002, Heritage has regional divisions throughout the
land. Its central office is located at 31 Moscovian Street, Yerevan
0002, Armenia, with telephone contact at (374-10) 536.913, fax at
(374-10) 532.697, email at [email protected] or [email protected],
and website at

www.heritage.am
www.heritage.am

ANKARA: Tear down these walls of fear and bigotry

Turkish Daily News, Turkey
April 21 2007

Tear down these walls of fear and bigotry

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Whenever, I see a church or synagogue, behind high walls or behind
buildings that have no historical or architectural value, I dream of
demolishing everything that surrounds it just so that they can stand
there proudly

Barcýn Yinanc

After having worked in Ankara for 15 years as a diplomatic reporter,
I decided to move to Istanbul three years ago. One of the things that
struck me in this city was the "timid" existence of the churches
and synagogues. It took me some time to realize that they existed,
even the ones next door, in my own neighborhood. Some are behind high
walls. Ugly buildings surround others; you can hardly see them. Without
doubt, one of the reasons for this situation is unplanned urbanization,
in this rapidly growing city. Some of the most beautiful architectural
legacies of the Ottoman rule, namely the fountains suffer the same
faith. But as far as the non-Muslim sacred places go, I have always
felt as if they were trying to hide themselves.

Whenever, I see a church or synagogue, behind high walls or behind
buildings that have no historical or architectural value, I dream of
demolishing everything that surrounds it just so that they can stand
there proudly. Then this city could really become another Jerusalem
in the region. Unfortunately, I realize that as the Turkish society,
we have not yet matured enough. How can we tell them to stop hiding,
without guaranteeing that they will not be targets of hostile attacks?

A country of contradiction:

Turkey is a country of contradiction. Some believe that the biggest
threat Turkey is facing today is Islamic fundamentalism. Recently,
Turkish President Sezer voiced his concerns, stating a few days ago
that the threat Islamic fundamentalism poses to the country’s secular
establishment has reached its highest level. It is no secret that
some among the security authorities share this view.

Isn’t it odd that, these same circles also see Christian missionaries
as a big threat? The National Security Council as well as the Interior
Ministry devotes a considerable amount of time to the activities of
missionaries in Turkey. Their archives are full of reports on the
dangerous increase in the activities of Christian minorities and the
measures that need to be taken to curb these activities. It usually
falls on the shoulders of the Foreign Ministry to answer criticism
on the international stage about the harassment to the missionaries
in Turkey, triggered by those reports.

How can a country be under the threat of both Islamic fundamentalism
and Christian missionaries at the same time? How can one imagine that
Christianity can easily take root in a society that is believed to
be sliding toward Muslim fundamentalism?

The hegemony of fear:

Actually the answer to these questions is a simple one: fear. There is
a group within the state mechanism that sees non-Muslims as a threat;
be it the minorities that have lived on this land for centuries or
those who recently arrived to propagate their religion.

This fear is based on what some Turks call the "Sevres syndrome." A
post World War I pact between the victorious Allied powers and the
Ottomans, the Sevres Treaty, abolished the Ottoman Empire and provided
for an independent Armenia, for an autonomous Kurdish region, and for
a Greek presence in eastern Thrace. The cooperation of non-Muslim
minorities with the Allied powers, as well as certain activities
by Christian minorities in the dying days of the Ottoman Empire,
laid the necessary ground for the Sevres Treaty. Hence the fear of
"foreign powers trying to divide Turkish land with the help of
non-Muslim minorities keeps haunting Turks even today.

An American diplomat once told me he kept a map of the Sevres Treaty in
his house to show the sensitivity of Turks to his non-Turkish guests.

I can understand the Sevres paranoia by the older generation. I feel
but sad and frightened when I see younger generations fed by this
same paranoia. What Turkey needs is to get rid of this fear of the
past and gain a little bit of self-confidence.

–Boundary_(ID_hyFu8cAyNtdtLR4zc XVAkg)–

Future Mother Died

FUTURE MOTHER DIED

A1+
[07:59 pm] 19 April, 2007

On April 16, Malatia police got a phone call about Armine Danielyan
(b.1970) who had been taken to hospital with a diagnosis of "cerebrum
trauma".

The examination proved that the injured had got trauma to interrupt her
pregnancy. She had taken a pill which made her bleed and consequently
fainted.

"Armenia" clinical center informed that Armine Danielyan died on
April 17.