The Blooming Friendship Between Azerbaijan And Israel

THE BLOOMING FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN AZERBAIJAN AND ISRAEL
BYLINE: By Anna Zamejc

Radio Free Europe
March 9, 2010
Czech Rep

When 13 years ago the late Azerbaijani President Heydar Aliyev received
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Baku, it was considered
a bold and politically risky decision. No red carpets were rolled out,
and the meeting was purposely kept low-key.

Today, however, no such precautions are needed, as visits of Israeli
leaders to Azerbaijan are no longer matters of domestic controversy.

However, the peculiar relationship of the two countries continues
to elude easy characterizations. Some external observers see it as a
typical marriage of convenience, while others tend to take it as an
alarming threat.

Although Azerbaijan is a predominantly Shi’ite Muslim country and a
majority of ethnic Azeris live in neighboring Iran (a ferocious enemy
of Israel), Baku routinely shares intelligence with the Jewish state,
buys its arms, and considers it trustworthy in security matters,
completely contradicting stereotypes about a "clash of civilizations."

Further, the informal alliance seems to undermine the geopolitical
game that the strongest actors — Russia and Iran — are determined
to play in the region.

Given how advanced bilateral relations are and how strong the mutual
trust appears, it might sound surprising that 18 years of diplomatic
contacts have not produced a single official treaty between Israel and
Azerbaijan. Moreover, Azerbaijani authorities remain vague to this day
about the widely anticipated potential opening of an embassy in Israel.

Why? The answer can be found in Iran.

Thorn In The Side

"Today, everyone understands why Iran wants to block the
Azerbaijani-Israeli rapprochement by any means," Baku-born former
Knesset member Josef Chagall, a major champion of Israeli-Azerbaijani
ties, said in an interview with RFE/RL’s Azerbaijani Service. "It
is one of the most important strategic priorities of the Islamic
republic. Tehran is perfectly aware of the following: the stronger the
connection between Baku and Jerusalem, the more weakened Iran will be."

Iran, which aspires to be a regional leader, would like to see
Azerbaijan play by its rules. But Azerbaijan, whose secular system is
a thorn in the side of the Islamic regime, not only refuses to conform
to Tehran’s dictates but has also crossed a red line by befriending
the sworn enemy of Iran’s president.

Azerbaijan has always felt threatened and continues to feel threatened
[by Iran] from an ideological, economic, and political point of
view."Very characteristic in this regard is the reaction of Iranian
President Mahmud Ahmadinejad to the official visit of Israeli President
Shimon Peres to Azerbaijan in…2009. In hysterical tones, the Iranian
leader demanded that the leadership of Azerbaijan immediately cancel
the visit of ‘the head of the Zionist entity’ and ‘the main enemy of
Muslims,’" Shagal recalls, adding that all Tehran’s efforts proved
counterproductive as Peres was received in Azerbaijan with the
highest honors.

"It is worth noting the dignity and tact with which Azerbaijani
President Ilham Aliyev recommended that his Iranian counterpart
refrain from giving advice to a leader of a sovereign state on to
whom to show hospitality and to whom to refuse it," he added.

Although Iran may not be in a position to keep Israel and Azerbaijan
completely apart, it has been successful in one respect: Despite
numerous calls from the Jewish state, Azerbaijan has still not opened
an embassy in Israel because of pressure from Tehran.

This creates a sort of diplomatic asymmetry as it has been 16 years
since Israel established its embassy in Azerbaijan. However, Baku has
thus far been reluctant to reciprocate. The advanced contacts with
Israel have already put a grave chill on Baku’s relations with Tehran,
and provoking Iran with an embassy in Israel could prove too costly
for Azerbaijan, even triggering a backlash from other Muslim states.

"Repeated efforts by Baku to find out how its southern neighbor
would react to opening an Azerbaijani Embassy in Israel have always
encountered Iranian ultimatums," Shagal says, stressing that it would
not only be Iranian-Azerbaijani relations that would suffer a massive
blow, but Baku would eventually have to pay the price in the area that
is of vital importance for the Caucasus republic: Nagorno-Karabakh.

"If Azerbaijan opens an embassy in Israel, then Iran will declare on
behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) a refusal
to support Azerbaijan in its conflict with Armenia, and would also
disavow all the efforts of Azerbaijan and its supporters in the OIC
for the restoration of its territorial integrity and the return of
Nagorno-Karabakh," Shagal says.

Influence Stability

Alexander Murinson, an independent researcher and academic writer who
follows developments in Israeli-Azerbaijani relations, is also afraid
that Baku could face difficulties once it decides to open the embassy.

"Iran can cause trouble for authorities in Azerbaijan and influence
the stability of the country. So obviously that’s another way of Iran
trying to influence the diplomatic relationship between Israel and
Azerbaijan," Murinson says.

"Azerbaijan has always felt threatened and continues to feel threatened
[by Iran] from an ideological, economic, and political point of
view. Iran obviously has a religious network in Azerbaijan that could
undermine the secular nature of the current regime in Azerbaijan,"
Murinson adds.

Despite those dangers, the IzRus portal reported last month, quoting
Israel’s ambassador to Azerbaijan, Michael Lavon-Lotem, that Baku will
soon open an embassy in Tel Aviv. Murinson warns that this might be
mere posturing, like a similar announcement in 2006. But he believes
that this time it could be for real.

"That development has been expected for many years, because the
relationship is thriving both in terms of economic trade ties and also
in the military field," Murinson says. "It might be an indication that
some agreement has been reached on very deep strategic cooperation
between the two parties that may not have been publicized."

A potential embassy would certainly be a culmination of Israel’s
long-term efforts to persuade Baku to formalize relations and could
boost Israel’s position abroad.

"For Israel, which is now faced by tremendous diplomatic pressure
around the globe for many reasons, when a Muslim country, especially
a Shi’ite country, makes this kind of announcement, it indicates for
Israel that it has a friend in the region. In such an environment,
Azerbaijan making this diplomatic move [would] create a very important,
positive dynamic for the state of Israel," Murinson says.

What’s In It For Baku?

Aran Amnon, an expert on the Middle East who lectures at City
University in London, adds that Israel might be now particularly
interested in strengthening ties with Baku as the threat of Iranian
nuclear capacity takes center stage in Israeli foreign policy.

"Israel has an interest in trying to improve its standing with as many
countries as possible, especially those who may be directly affected
by Iran and might by persuaded to be supportive of Israeli efforts,"
Amnon says.

But in international relations, every nation acts on its own
interests. The gains seem obvious for Israel, but why should Baku be
willing to take the risk? Murinson links the potential switch to the
new dynamics that were created by Turkish-Armenian rapprochement and
the deteriorating relations between Ankara and Tel Aviv.

In fact, Baku has a lot of other reasons for being interested
in deepening ties with Israel. Israel is an important source of
military equipment, and reportedly it was Israel who helped Baku
rebuild its army after the heavy losses it suffered during the war
over Nagorno-Karabakh. The military aspect of the relationship has
been present ever since.

"During the visit of Simon Peres, a very important contract was
signed which included construction of a plant in Azerbaijan that would
produce unmanned aerial vehicles. By doing so, Azerbaijan would become
an important producer of very advanced systems in the region — even
Russia doesn’t have advanced unmanned aerial vehicles," Murinson says,
stressing that the lack of such systems proved problematic during
the August 2008 Russia-Georgia war.

Israel plays an important role in Azerbaijani security arrangements.

The electronic fence around Baku’s international airport was built by
Israeli companies. Reportedly, Israeli firms are supplying equipment
to ensure the safety of Azerbaijan’s energy infrastructure, and there
were also rumors that Israelis provide security for Azerbaijan’s
president on his foreign visits.

Last but not least, Azerbaijan is the home of an ancient Jewish
community, which remains an important aspect in mutual contacts.

"We estimate that there are approximately 25,000 Jews living
in Azerbaijan," Mark Levin, the executive director of National
Conference of the Soviet Jewry says. "Azeri Jews have lived side
by side with their non-Jewish neighbors for centuries, and they are
treated very well."

Anna Zamejc is a correspondent for RFE/RL’s Azerbaijani Service. The
views expressed in this commentary are the author’s own and do not
necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL

US House Decision Won’t Go Unanswered: Erdogan

US HOUSE DECISION WON’T GO UNANSWERED: ERDOGAN

Tert.am
13:57 ~U 09.03.10

Turkey will take retaliate against the passing of Armenian Genocide
Resolution 252 by the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs
Committee, siad Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the
airport prior to leaving for Saudia Arabia, reports Turkish news
agency Ankara.

"At this time there is no roadmap or anything else on this issue…

however, undoubtedly, that step won’t remain without a response. There
will be adequate steps [taken]," said Erdogan.

Azerbaijani UN delegates sent letter to Ban Ki-moon

news.am, Armenia
Jan 8 2010

Azerbaijani UN delegates sent letter to Ban Ki-moon

16:49 / 01/08/2010 Permanent Representation of Azerbaijan to the UN
sent a letter to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon expressing concern over
the fact that `Armenia keeps on neglecting its international
commitments related to Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.’

Armenia’s stance on the real essence of the conflict threatens to lead
astray the international community. Unconstructive position of
Armenian authorities endangers solution to the dispute by political
means, the letter reads.

Azerbaijani delegates claim that Armenia is presently the only
mono-ethnic country in the world where racial discrimination prevails
in politics, calling on UN and international organizations to
undertake more serious measures against Armenia, Azertag reports.

A.G.

Azerbaijan Continues Information War Against Euronews

AZERBAIJAN CONTINUES INFORMATION WAR AGAINST EURONEWS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
15.12.2009 16:22 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azerbaijanis continue protests in connection with
a Euronews "Nagorno-Karabakh – the wind of change" TV report, during
which the journalist called Karabakh the original Armenian land.

The Azerbaijani Press Council joined the protests.

The peculiarity of the scandal is that lacking its own information
tools in Europe, Azerbaijan has long used Euronews services to
advertise tour trips to the country, abc.az reported.

Kazakhstan Welcomes Establishment Of Diplomatic Relations Between Ar

KAZAKHSTAN WELCOMES ESTABLISHMENT OF DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS BETWEEN ARMENIA AND TURKEY

Gazeta.KZ
08:56 13.10.2009

The official representative of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of
Kazakhstan, Yerzhan Ashikbayev, informed at yesterday’s briefing,
"Kazakhstan Today" agency reports.

"The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan welcomes signing on
October, 10 in Zurich of the protocol on establishment of diplomatic
relations between the Republic of Armenia and the Turkish Republic and
the protocol on development of mutual relations between the Republic
of Armenia and the Turkish Republic," Y. Ashikbayev informed.

The usage of news by Kazakhstan Today news agency is prohibited unless
you have a direct permission of the Information Agency.

Details: Copy rights for information of the agency, information
on restrictions.

Full news wire of Kazakhstan Today news agency is available on the
address:

www.kt.kz.

National Strategy For Transportation Safety Developed In Armenia

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DEVELOPED IN ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
22.09.2009 21:23 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On September 22, the first sitting of transportation
safety national strategy development group was held, headed by RA
National Security Council Secretary Artur Baghdasaryan.

Strategy development and ratification is determined by RA National
Strategy within Armenia-EU collaboration program.

National strategy for transportation safety aims at high-level safety
provision while transporting passengers and cargo, Baghdasaryan
emphasized.

The project will be submitted to National Security Council for
ratification. Upon ratification, RA Government will launch a 5-year
project, in accordance with Armenia-EU program, RA National Security
Council press service reported.

Armenian Community Of Uzbekistan Sends Letter Of Condolence To RA Mi

ARMENIAN COMMUNITY OF UZBEKISTAN SENDS LETTER OF CONDOLENCE TO RA MINISTER OF DIASPORA IN CONNECTION WITH IRANIAN PLANE CRASH

Noyan Tapan
July 28, 2009

TASHKENT, JULY 28, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. On behalf of the
Armenian community in Uzbekistan, the board of the Armenian National
Cultural Center in that country sent a letter of condolence to the
RA Minister of Diaspora Ms. Hranush Hakobian. The letter reads:

"Dear Ms. Hranush. The news of the tragic death of the passengers and
crew of the Iranian plane bound for Yerevan caused us a deep pain. The
mourning days declared in Armenia are painful to the whole Armenian
people, both in Armenia and around the world. We grieve over the
irreparable loss suffered by the families and relatives of the crash
victims and by the Armenian people. Our centuries-old faith will give
strength to us, while the unity of the Armenians in Homeland and the
Diaspora will help us endure this misfortune".

Obama and the Denial of Genocide – An Interview With David Boyajian

Obama and the Denial of Genocide – An Interview With David Boyajian

By Michael Zezima, 12 May 2009

Michael Zezima, one of the Web’s most noted political commentators,
conducted the following interview with David Boyajian. Zezima is
known professionally as `Mickey Z.’ (). The interview
was also published on several other widely read websites, including
ForeignPolicyJournal, CounterCurrents, IndyMedia, OnlineJournal, and
OpEdNews.
Writer-activist David Boyajian’s investigative articles and
commentaries have appeared in Armenian media outlets in the U.S.,
Europe, Middle East, and Armenia, and the Newton Tab and USA Armenian
Life newspapers named him among their "Top 10 Newsmakers of 2007." So,
when Barack Obama paid a visit to Turkey last month, it seemed like a
good time to ask Boyajian for his take on the new president’s approach
to the issue of the Armenian genocide.

Mickey Z: This April, President Barack Obama broke campaign promise
#511, namely to explicitly acknowledge the Armenian genocide as U.S.
President. What happened on his recent visit to Turkey? What are the
ramifications of his breaking this promise?
David Boyajian: President Obama visited Turkey from April 6 to 7, where
he did not use the word `genocide’ when referring to the 1.5 million
murders committed by the Turkish Ottoman Empire against its Armenian
citizens from 1915-1923. As a candidate, Obama had promised several
times to do so. His statement in Turkey that he had `not changed his
views”implying he still believes it was genocide’was still a clear
breach of his promise to use the `G word.’ It was a case study in
verbal gymnastics and political duplicity and should be studied in
political science courses. Obama’s broken promise obviously eroded his
credibility. The same holds true for Vice President Joe Biden and
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who, as senators, supported the
Armenian genocide resolution. They’ve since fallen disgracefully
silent. Dr. Samantha Power should also be embarrassed. She’s the
National Security Council’s genocide expert and a Pulitzer Prize
winning author. As a campaign advisor to Obama, she made a video
telling Armenian Americans that as president, Obama would definitely
acknowledge their genocide. `Take my word for it,’ she said.

Appeasement of a genocide-denying country such as Turkey is bad policy
because its message is that genocides can be committed without
consequence. Appeasement also erodes U.S. credibility on human rights
and its stated desire to be a leader in genocide prevention. Unlike
what lobbyists for Turkey would have us believe, Armenian genocide
affirmation by America would not harm U.S. national interests. Turkey
depends on the U.S. for weapons systems, support for billions in loans
from the International Monetary Fund, security guarantees through NATO,
advocacy for Turkish membership in the European Union, and more. Some
20 countries, including Canada, France, and Switzerland, as well as the
parliaments of the EU and the Council of Europe, have acknowledged the
Armenian genocide. None has ever experienced much more a Turkish
temper tantrum in retaliation.

MZ: Two days prior to Armenian Genocide Remembrance day’ which
annually falls on April 24’Turkey and Armenia announced that they had
agreed to a `roadmap’ to normalize relations. What was the significance
of this timing? What does the `roadmap’ contain?

DB: Behind the scenes, the U.S. State Department had long been twisting
Armenia’s arm to agree to a so-called `roadmap’ with Turkey before
President Obama issued what has become a customary `April 24 statement’
by U.S. presidents marking Armenian genocide memorial day. The
`roadmap,’ announced on April 22, provided political cover for Obama to
not use the `G word’ on April 24. That is, since there was now
supposedly a roadmap for normalization of relations’no matter how vague
and hurriedly slapped together’ Obama could say that he did not want to
upset Turkey and the touted-as-highly-delicate Turkish-Armenian
negotiations by using the `G word.’ Notice that Obama did not consult
with Armenian-Americans or Armenia about this. So much for promises
and moral principles. It’s disgraceful that Obama, simply to help
Turkey save face, not only broke his promise, but showed blatant
disregard for the activists’not just Armenians’who labored so hard for
many years for the cause of recognizing all genocides.

Armenia has always said that it was ready to normalize relations with
Turkey’which would include Turkey’s re-opening its border with
Armenia’without pre-conditions. Suddenly, however, Armenia has had
pre-conditions imposed on it in this `roadmap.’ According to the
Turkish press, the `roadmap’ allegedly contains pre-conditions such as:
Armenia’s agreeing to a joint commission to examine the veracity of the
Armenian genocide’yes, you heard right, Armenia’s formal recognition of
current Turkish boundaries’which contain the Armenian homeland, and,
possibly, Armenia’s accepting Turkish mediation in the conflict between
Armenians and Azerbaijan over the disputed Armenian region of
Karabagh’which is absurd since Azerbaijan and Turkey are allies. It
appears that Armenia’s president, whose electoral legitimacy is in
question, has been worn down in these negotiations by Turkey, the West,
and possibly even Russia. And because the Armenian president is
grappling with his legitimacy, he is not heeding the cautions being
voiced by the20people of his own nation about the `roadmap.’

MZ: The U.S. administration and mainstream media would have us believe
that Turkey is seeking to `reconcile’ with Armenia. Is
`reconciliation’ really a possibility, or have we misunderstood what’s
going on?

DB: The word `reconciliation’ in relation to Armenian-Turkish relations
is largely an invention of U.S. policymakers, their emissaries, and the
mainstream media who take their cues from them. What the U.S. and
Europe would like to see is a more stable Caucasus’that is, Armenia,
Azerbaijan, and Georgia’with open borders. Open borders, you see,
would facilitate laying more oil and gas pipelines that would originate
in the Caspian Sea region and proceed west to Turkey and then to
energy-hungry Europe and Israel. The U.S. and Europe don’t want to put
it quite that crudely’no pun intended’so they try to depict Armenia and
Turkey as possibly `reconciling’ and thus resolving all their
differences. Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993 out of
sympathy with its ally Azerbaijan, which was in a war with the
Armenians of Karabagh, a historically Armenian-populated autonomous
area within Azerbaijan that Stalin handed to Azerbaijan. Turkey has
also been infuriated that Armenia and Armenians worldwide have been
demanding that Turkey acknowledge the genocide it committed against
Armenians.

Turkey has to acknowledge the genocide or there will never be peace
between it and Armenia. And although the Armenian government has not
put forth any claims for reparations arising out of the genocide, or
for territory, many Armenians do have these goals. They cite the
Treaty of Sèvres of 1920, which provided for Armenian sovereignty over
Armenian lands upon which Turkey committed the genocide, and which have
since been incorporated into what is now eastern Turkey.

MZ: The countries of the Caucasus are Armenia, Georgia, and
Azerbaijan. Most Americans, including the mainstream media, could not
find these small countries on a map. Why are Russia and the U.S.’the
latter being thousands of miles from the region’so interested in these
three small countries?

DB: The Caucasus is truly Ground Zero in Cold War II, the ongoing
conflict between the U.S. and Russia. The U.S.’along with Europe and
the NATO military alliance’regard Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan as
middlemen between the West and the gas and oil-rich regions around the
Caspian Sea. The West has already laid gas and oil pipelines from
Azerbaijan through Georgia and then on to Turkey and the west. The
U.S. wanted those and future pipelines to bypass Russia and Iran
because those two countries could shut such pipelines to pressure the
U.S. and others. The only possible pipelines routes, therefore, are
through Georgia or Armenia. But Turkey shut its border with Armenia in
1993, and Azerbaijan closed its border with Armenia even earlier due to
the conflict between it and the de-facto Armenian region of Karabagh.
That left Georgia as the only place for these Western pipelines. After
the Russian-Georgian war last year, however, opening an alternative
route has become more urgent. That largely explains the West’s renewed
interest in Armenia. Conversely, Russia sees the Caucasus as within
its traditional sphere of influence, and regards U.S. and European
interest in the region as hostile acts.

Simultaneously, NATO has been pushing into the region. Georgia,
Azerbaijan, and to some extent even the ex-Soviet republics on the
other side of the Caspian Sea, are on the path to joining NATO. Russia
was already upset that, following the Cold War, NATO had absorbed the
former Warsaw Pact nations of Eastern Europe. NATO is now attempting,
in effect, to do the same thing on Russia’s southern border. Russia
fears that it will eventually be virtually surrounded by NATO. As a
result, we have Cold War II: The U.S. and NATO are trying to push into
the Caucasus and Central Asia, while Russia is trying to keep them out.

MZ: Why is Israel interested in the Caucasus, and what role is that
country playing? Why are Israel and the pro-Israel lobby dead set
against recognition of the Armenian genocide by the U.S. Co
ngress?

DB: Israel is interested in getting some of the oil and gas that flow
out of the Caspian Sea region. That is, from countries such as
Azerbaijan, oil and gas flow west through Georgia, and then on to
Turkey and other countries, possibly including Israel. After all, the
U.S. and Turkey, which are important players in these pipelines, are
obviously also very friendly with Israel. Israel also welcomes all
non-Arab supplies of energy since they would make its Western allies
less dependent on Arab oil and gas. And Israel has long had what it
calls its Periphery Policy. Historically, Israel has not had good
relations with its Arab neighbors. Therefore, to serve as
counterweights, Israel befriends those countries further away,
especially Muslim countries, that aren’t necessarily sympathetic to
Israel’s Arab neighbors or Palestinians. Azerbaijan, the only Muslim
nation in the Caucasus, and some Muslim nations to the east, such as
Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, are such countries. Fortuitously for
Israel, they also possess significant deposits of gas and oil.

For decades, Israel and Turkey have had very good relations, mainly
because they have a common ally, the U.S., and common adversaries,
namely Arab nations. In the 1990’s, Israel and Turkey signed a number
of military, economic, and political agreements that solidified their
relationship. Even before that, but particularly after that, Turkey
felt that it did not have sufficient lobbying muscle in Washington. So
the Turks asked Israel to convince some of the pro-Israel lobby’the
Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Committee and others’to serve
as advocates for Turkey. The Jewish lobby groups agreed. So these
groups, as part of their deal with Turkey, deny or call into question
the Armenian genocide and work to prevent U.S. acknowledgement of that
genocide. These groups won’t tolerate anyone questioning of the
Holocaust, and yet hypocritically work against acknowledgment of the
Armenian genocide. Interestingly, for the last 2 years, Armenian
Americans have exposed the ADL’s hypocrisy. In Massachusetts, for
example, fourteen cities severed ties with an anti-bias program
sponsored by the ADL because of the latter’s hypocritical and
anti-Armenian stance (see NoPlaceForDenial.com). Armenians are
determined to challenge genocide denial whenever it occurs.

MZ: Is there a problem with the way the mainstream media has been
covering Armenian issues?

DB: Yes. The mainstream media have several problems. First, they know
very little about the Caucasus or Armenians. Reporters tend,
therefore, to copy each other and repeat clichés and falsehoods’such as
that Armenia and Turkey are on the verge of a historic
`reconciliation.’ Media also tend to accept at face value the
propaganda issued by Western governments whose interest in the Caucasus
is’let’s be frank’not `reconciliation,’ democracy, or human rights, but
rather self-interested economic, political, and military political
penetration of the Caucasus.

Turkey has about 30 times more people and territory, and 50 times more
Gross Domestic Product, than Armenia. The power differential is
enormous. Turkey has infinitely more allies in Western media,
governments, think tanks, and multi-national corporations’and knows how
to use them. Commentators who have a vested interest in touting Turkey
for their own political and even financial reasons have particularly
come out of the woodwork to deride legitimate Armenian demands. But we
rarely hear commentators speak of how a small country that has been the
victim of genocide, that has had most of its territory stripped from
it, and that has been blockaded by the denier of that
genocide’Turkey’is being threatened by that very same unrepentant
denier. Mainstream media largely fail to appreciate the foregoing
facts. Hopefully, Mickey, this interview will help the media and your
readers understand the issues and the region a bit better.

David Boyajian can be reached at [email protected]

http://www.keghart.com/node/482
www.MickeyZ.net

ACA Calls Upon President Obama To Reaffirm Armenian Genocide

ACA CALLS UPON PRESIDENT OBAMA TO REAFFIRM ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

armradio.am
23.04.2009 14:20

On April 23, the Armenian Council of America (ACA) sent United States
President Barack Obama a letter. In the letter, the ACA addressed the
upcoming anticipated annual April 24th presidential statement on the
Armenian Genocide issue.

President Obama on numerous occasions during his recent visit to
the Republic of Turkey made references to the Armenian Genocide,
including stating that "my views are on the record and I have not
changed views." Previously Barack Obama has said, "I believe that
the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation and America deserves a
leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian Genocide. I intend
to be that President."

The full text of the letter is below.

"Dear President Obama:

Victims of genocides and advocates of humanity throughout the world are
waiting to hear your words this upcoming April 24th as you remember
and commemorate the deaths of 1.5 million Armenian men, women, and
children during the period of 1915-1923 in the Ottoman Empire.

As recently as April 6th during your visit to the Republic of Turkey,
you stated that "my views are on the record and I have not changed
views" when asked about your current position on the Armenian Genocide.

In your official address to the Turkish Parliament, you directly called
upon the Turkish government to rectify its past and history on the
Armenian Genocide. It is vital that Turkey itself fully acknowledges
the 20th Century in order to be a nation of the 21st Century.

We are aware that you are treading your words on your record of the
Armenian Genocide, because the Turkish government continues to threaten
repercussions and disturbances of the U.S.-Turkish relationship should
you now as America’s president restate your position. "I believe that
the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation and America deserves a
leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian Genocide. I intend
to be that President".

Our neighbor to the north Canada, is a fellow NATO ally of both the
United States and the Republic of Turkey. Five years ago, the Canadian
Parliament by an all-party effort, recognized the Armenian Genocide. As
recently as April 21st, the Canadian government continues to endorse
and accept the recognition of the historical reality of the Armenian
Genocide through Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s courageous statements.

Prime Minister Harper’s office maintains that Turkey is a friend and
an ally, that there is a difference of opinion around the issue of
the Armenian Genocide, but that the Canadian government stands by
their position of supporting historical truth.

Mr. President, you have been distinguished in upholding the pledges you
have made and have truly brought change in many policy areas. Will the

Armenian Genocide issue continue in your pattern of successful
achievements or will it be the exception? The Armenian Council
of America and the Armenian American community look forward to you
fulfilling your pledge in your statement on April 24th as you reaffirm
the American as well as your own record on the Armenian Genocide."

ANKARA: Armenians Eye Moves With Deep Skepticism

ARMENIANS EYE MOVES WITH DEEP SKEPTICISM

Hurriyet
April 20 2009
Turkey

YEREVAN – High expectations in Yerevan of sealing the deal with Turkey
to establish diplomatic ties and reopen the border have yielded to
concerns that bilateral relations have been besieged once again by
the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.

The Armenian side no longer talks about the possibility of rapid
progress before April 24, the day that commemorates the mass-killing
of Armenians in 1915, but maintains cautious optimism about opening
the border within 2009. Meanwhile, the U.S. administration dispatched
Assistant Secretary of State Matt Bryza to the region.

Bryza arrives in Ankara today after a round of talks in Baku and
Yerevan in search of a breakthrough on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.

While Ankara now points to the meeting of Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev and Russian President Dimitry Medvedev on May 6 as a new
critical juncture, it was learned that Bryza hoped for a breakthrough
on the Karabakh issue in June. Former Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan
Oskanian, who witnessed a failure of talks with then-Foreign Minister
Abdullah Gul, argued that what was happening today was a repetition
of history. Speaking exclusively to Hurriyet Daily News & Economic
Review on Saturday, Oskanian recalled his own experience with the
Justice and Development Party, or AKP, government.

"I remember my first meeting with Gul. The AKP had just come to power
then and he told me they wanted to normalize relations and added that
Turkey did not benefit from linking the Turkey-Armenia problem to third
countries and Nagorno-Karabakh. And I told him that this was music
to my ears because we have been advocating for this for so long,"
he said. "But then they realized that the Azeri pressure cannot be
dismissed or ignored. Karabakh again became part of our discussions
and after a while it became clear that the Karabakh issue was the
main obstacle between the two countries."

Ankara`s efforts for an international push toward rapid progress
on Karabakh, meanwhile, have other implications for the U.S. in
terms of the power struggle in the Caucasus. Foreign Minister Ali
Babacan’s meeting with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov in
Yerevan last week, raised eyebrows in Washington, adding to the
existing discontent over Russian-Azerbaijani negotiations over
gas. Third-country diplomats, meanwhile, are worried that Armenia’s
cautious optimism might be lost, leading to a walk-out from the
negotiation table if Turkey squanders too much time with the Karabakh
problem. Assertive public statements similar to Erdogan`s on Karabakh
to please Azerbaijan need to be particularly avoided in these days,
according to diplomatic observers who follow the process closely.

"Nagorno-Karabakh may play some role over Turkish-Armenian
relations. But I think the problem is much deeper than this. Turkey
is not ready now," said Hovhannes Igityan, one of the leading names
of the National Armenia Party, led by the country’s first president,
Levon Ter-Petrossian. "When Turkey is ready to establish relations,
it would not wait for a declaration from Azerbaijan," he said.

Tevan Poghosyan, executive director of the International Center for
Human Development, joins veteran politician Igityan in disregarding
the Karabakh question as the threshold of a Turkish-Armenian
rapprochement. "I believe that Nagorno-Karabakh is just a fake,
artificial reason not to take a real step. Internal problems in
Turkey do not allow Turkey’s decision-makers to take the big step,"
he told to the Daily News.

While skepticism of Turkey’s sincerity still exists as an important
element of public opinion in Armenia, businessmen stand out among the
primary actors ready to reverse suspicion into interaction. Arsen
Ghazaryan, president of Union of Manufacturers and Businessmen of
Armenia (equivalent of TUSIAD) noted that because of the border
closure, the two nations that have lived together for 600 years are
losing the chance to culturally and economically reintegrate.