Turkish press: Azerbaijan’s oil fund places $1.1B deposit in Turkey’s central bank

U.S. dollar and Euro bank notes are photographed in Frankfurt, Germany, in this illustration picture taken May 7, 2017. (Reuters Photo)

The State Oil Fund of the Republic of Azerbaijan (SOFAZ) has placed a 1 billion euro ($1.1 billion) deposit account within the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (CBRT), Azerbaijan’s Trend news agency reported Friday.

The deposit is for a period of six months, the report said.

The investment is expected to make a positive contribution to Turkey’s financial stability, SOFAZ said in a statement on its website.

“The investment of these funds in the Central Bank of Turkey was carried out within the investment strategy of SOFAZ,” the fund said.

Previously speaking to Bloomberg HT, sources stated that a deposit account would be opened from Azerbaijan.

The central banks of Azerbaijan and Turkey were earlier this month reported to have been close to signing a 1 billion euro currency swap deal, but Chairperson of the Board of the Central Bank of Azerbaijan (CBA) Elman Rustamov on Friday denied such claims.

“The CBA refutes the information spread by several media outlets about alleged negotiations on this matter,” Rustamov was cited as saying by Trend news agency.

Rustamov added that the central banks of the two countries are actively cooperating in several spheres.

Effective cooperation between Armenian, Russian Armed Forces an integral part of bilateral allied relations – Embassy

Save

Share

 16:38,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 28, ARMENPRESS. The Russian Embassy in Armenia congratulated Armenia and all its citizens on the Army Day.

In a statement the Embassy said that the Armed Forces of Armenia and its servicemen are the real sons of their homeland, distinguished by their bravery and courage.

“They are the ones who proudly continue the glorious military traditions of the generation of the Great Patriotic War heroes, who have jointly made our common victory”, the Embassy said. “In our today’s complex, rapidly changing world full of different challenges, the effective cooperation of the Armed Forces of Russia and Armenia is one of the inseparable elements of the entire complex of the Armenian-Russian allied relations. The bilateral strategic cooperation in military sector plays a vital role in the protection of the national interests and sovereignty of our countries.

On the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the foundation of the Armenian Armed Forces, we wish the military leadership of the country, all servicemen and veterans of the Armenian Army, as well as their families good health, welfare and peaceful sky”, it added.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Slovakia replies to the question of deployment of NATO forces in the country

Save

Share

 18:33,

YEREVAN, 27 JANUARY, ARMENPRESS. NATO considers the possibility of sending a military contingent to Slovakia as a response to the situation related to Ukraine, ARMENPRESS reports, ”RIA Novosti” informs Minister of Foreign Affairs of Slovakia Ivan Korčok said on January 27, commenting on the information of Sky News that 1000 servicemen of the alliance can be deployed in the eastern part, including in Slovakia.

Sky News TV channel reported on January 27 that members of NATO consider the possibility of creating new military units consisting of one thousand servicemen in Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Slovakia. It is mentioned that the new units will be similar to units present in the Baltic countries and Poland.

”NATO considers the deployment of the reinforcement forces, including in Slovakia. No decision has been made yet. This is not the request of the Slovak side, it is an inseparable part of normal defense as a response to the situation around Ukraine”, said Ivan Korčok.

Opposition MP: Armen Sarkissian’s resignation is ‘belated’

panorama.am
Armenia – Jan 24 2022

Armenian President Armen Sarkissian’s resignation is “belated” or meaningless because it does not help resolve any problems facing the country, MP Artur Vanetsyan, the leader of the opposition With Honor parliamentary faction, told Sputnik Armenia.

Sarkissian submitted resignation on Sunday, stating that the president does not have the necessary tools to influence the important processes concerning the domestic and foreign policy in difficult times for the country.

Vanetsyan states the conduct of the current Armenian authorities are beyond “sound political logic”.

“The already former president, as a matter of fact, did not use at least the minimal powers vested in him by the Constitution in the most difficult times for our country and during the most important processes,” the lawmaker said.

“Sarkissian considered these powers insufficient or ineffective, whereas in many specific cases they could have helped resolve major challenges and problems facing our country. This, in turn, could have prevented the catastrophic situation which we have found ourselves in,” he explained.

Taking all this into account, Vanetsyan thinks that it is of little importance whether the president resigned under pressure or voluntarily. In addition, according to the politician, during his tenure Sarkissian did not give reasons to put pressure on him and actively cooperated with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

Also, Vanetsyan said it is too early to talk about possible nomination of an opposition candidate for president.

“The Homeland Party led by me and the With Honor faction are yet to hold consultations on the matter. It will take some time,” he noted.

Armenpress: Pashinyan rules out the involvement of CSTO forces in suppressing internal political processes

Pashinyan rules out the involvement of CSTO forces in suppressing internal political processes

Save

Share

 21:50,

YEREVAN, 24 JANUARY, ARMENPRESS. It is in Armenia’s interest for the Collective Security Treaty Organization to be an effective system, ARMENPRESS reports Pashinyan said during an online press conference organized for the representatives of mass media and non-governmental organizations.

Answering the question whether, based on the Kazakh precedent, any Armenian government in the future can suppress the internal political uprisings in the country bringing forward the same reasons, involving the CSTO forces, the Prime Minister said, “After November 9, 2020, we have had undesirable developments in Armenia for the government. We demonstrated in practice our vision on the tools to overcome these situations. After the events of November 9, when the Government, the National Assembly, the government cottages were attacked, an assassination attempt was made on the National Assembly President, no shots were fired by the authorities in Armenia, no force was used by the Armenian government. Roads were blocked, no action was taken to open the roads. We have already shown our toolkit for solving internal political problems. We went to the early elections. Our law enforcement agencies have been at their height.”

Answering the question why the CSTO did not suppress the revolution in 2018, Pashinyan stated that in 2018 there was no case of violence in Armenia. “When we decided to send a peacekeeping mission to Kazakhstan, there were already street battles there, there were casualties.”

The Prime Minister reminded that from the first day of his government, the activity of the Armenian side in the CSTO was aimed at improving the crisis response mechanisms.

“It would be strange if such a situation existed for the first time, and Armenia would say that it is against. It is in Armenia’s interest to have a CSTO as an effective system. This answers all the questions,” he said.

Pashinyan stressed that Armenia has clearly stated that the CSTO forces cannot be involved in any internal political processes, but can be engaged in the protection of objects of strategic importance. “The Armenian Armed Forces have been defending a bakery in Kazakhstan. I do not think there is anything reprehensible in it. The protection of the bread factory does not affect the internal political process in any way,” said the Prime Minister.

Everybody gets something out of talks between Ankara and Yerevan

Jan 21 2022
by Marta Ottaviani

The first round of talks took place in Moscow, and a second will probably be held in Turkey. Peace would help Armenia break the economic isolation that made it the poorest former Soviet republic in the Caucasus. Erdogan needs a success to counter the collapse of the Turkish lira. The Kremlin would boost its diplomatic standing. The Armenian Genocide remains the main stumbling block.

Milan (AsiaNews) – Will Turkey and Armenia make peace? This could be the right time. If the thorniest obstacles were removed, everyone could get something. 

The first round of negotiations that took place in Moscow in mid-January could soon be followed by a second, this despite controversies and difficulties surrounding the process, especially in Ankara, which would have preferred a diplomatic solution with Yerevan without Moscow.

The Kremlin is directly involved and is not going to miss a golden opportunity to boost its international standing and diplomatic footprint in the Caucasus.

Diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey were frozen in 1993, when Ankara closed its border following the war between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh, a region with an Armenian majority, but in Azerbaijani territory. 

Tensions have flared up periodically over the years. In 2020 Turkish support for Azerbaijan in its conflict with Armenia proved decisive for Azerbaijani victory. However, since then, the Caucasus has become even more unstable.

Although Moscow risks losing its inherent pre-eminence, it is aware at this time, for different reasons, that a successful mediation would be convenient for everyone.

Armenia would gain by breaking the economic and trade isolation that has made it the poorest former Soviet republic in the South Caucasus.

Turkey would be internationally rehabilitated and could gain interesting opportunities, especially in infrastructure, in a country that is still backward in many respects. 

One issue remains, namely the recognition of the Armenian Genocide of 1915 by the Ottoman Empire with at least one million deaths, which Turkey refuses to acknowledge, perhaps above all, for economic reasons.

On paper, Moscow would gain the most. In fact, in the Russian capital, the talk is all about victory.  The Kremlin would see its diplomatic standing greatly increased and achieve a hegemonic position in the trade routes that will automatically open in the region.

For Ankara, this is not an appealing prospect. Nonetheless, Turkey sent to Moscow a high-profile diplomat, Serdar Kiliç, a former ambassador to the United States and a trusted man of Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu.

This is a sign that the Turkish government believes in the possibility of a positive outcome and that it is ready to invest as much as necessary in achieving it. Within government circles though, the role played by Moscow is still hard to swallow, and the preference is for bilateral talks.

While the inaugural meeting of these negotiations was held in the Russian capital, the next will be in one of the two countries, preferably Turkey, where President Erdogan needs a boost after facing declining support as a result of the devaluation of the Turkish lira.

This seems all right on paper; however, some believe that Moscow’s mediation could backfire. 

Ali Askerov, associate professor and head of the Department of Conflict Studies at the University of North Carolina-Greensboro, believes that mediation between Turkey and Armenia is possible, but the two sides could follow their own path, far from Moscow’s control, thus taking a different turn from the one the Kremlin has in mind.

“In terms of real politik,” Prof Askerov told AsiaNews, “If Turkey and Armenia find a compromise from which both sides can gain in a more or less balanced way, Russia could eventually lose the most. It will be able to develop new synergies, but without dominating the process of normalisation [of relations] and the opportunities that follow from it.”

In short, Moscow is probably overplaying its cards. Tensions have marred its relationship with Turkey, an ally of convenience, and new stresses cannot be excluded; it all depends on how the situation evolves in the Caucasus.

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 18-01-22

Save

Share

 17:29,

YEREVAN, 18 JANUARY, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 18 January, USD exchange rate up by 0.03 drams to 481.52 drams. EUR exchange rate down by 1.27 drams to 548.74 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate down by 0.02 drams to 6.28 drams. GBP exchange rate down by 2.61 drams to 656.02 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price down by 77.19 drams to 28142.55 drams. Silver price down by 1.29 drams to 356.3 drams. Platinum price down by 60.98 drams to 15094.2 drams.

Defense Minister introduces new head of Vazgen Sargsyan Military University to staff and students

Save

Share

 11:16,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 11, ARMENPRESS. Defense Minister of Armenia Suren Papikyan visited the Vazgen Sargsyan Military University to introduce the new head of the educational facility, Colonel Artur Yeroyan to the University staff and students, the ministry reports.

In his remarks minister Papikyan said that it’s impossible to overestimate the role of the military education in the formation of a modern and combat-ready army, stating that in this respect the Armenian military educational facilities have an important mission to carry out. The defense minister assured that the activity of the University will be under his spotlight.

Suren Papikyan also toured the University area, got acquainted with the study process and educational programs, and gave instructions.

Armenia and Belarus deploy peacekeepers to Kazakhstan

Vestnik Kavkaza
Jan 6 2022
 6 Jan in 15:20

The Armenian military are deployed to Kazakhstan as part of the CSTO peacekeeping forces.

Some 70 soldiers will be deployed as part of the CSTO to protect the strategic facilities amid mass protests in Kazakhstan.

The collective peacekeeping forces may include special military, police and civilian personnel and forces sent by the CSTO countries. Russia’s contingent includes a unit of airborne troops.

The Belarusian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that Belarus is fully prepared to provide assistance to the friendly people of Kazakhstan and stays fully committed to its obligations, BelTA reported.

Journal of Society for Armenian Studies Releases Volume 28.1 on Theme of Performance

Opening pages of “A Pictorial Guide” showing children, including Tolegian Hughes’ daughter at the center, at the door of Saints Joachim and Anne Armenian Apostolic Church, Palos Heights, Illinois. Photo courtesy of Lenore Tolegian Hughes

The Society for Armenian Studies announces the release of Volume 28, Issue 1 (Spring 2021) of the Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies, edited by Tamar M. Boyadjian (Michigan State University) and Rachel Goshgarian (Lafayette College) the Reviews and Reconsiderations Editor. This volume of the JSAS includes four articles, one film review, one museum review, the newly created Matenadaran Review of Books, seven book reviews, and one article in the newly created On Graduate Studies section.

The articles within this volume are centered around the theme of performance by examining the cultural and social engagements of Armenians, the positionalities of these performers, and how they produce change through the arts and humanities. Topics found within this issue include theater, film noir, music in the Armenian diaspora, liturgy and ritual, and the individual’s inner world.

The volume begins with Ayşe Kadıoğlu’s study of the departure of Eliza Binemeciyan, a prominent Armenian star of the theater, from Istanbul. Kadıoğlu’s article, “Leaving a Life Behind: Eliza Binemeciyan’s Encounter with ‘the Banality of Evil,’” details the decline of cosmopolitanism and the rise of nationalism and Turkification policies in Istanbul. By shifting the attention from Binemeciyan’s absence to her presence, Kadıoğlu highlights the impact that the actress had in creating and sustaining Istanbul’s theaters at the turn of the 20th century.

Eliza Binemeciyan, Rasit Riza and Onnik Binemeciyan in the play curum. Source: Hrant Dink Foundation Archive, Hagop Ayvaz Collection

FIG 1:

Kadıoğlu’s article is followed by Sylvia Angelique Alajaji exploring making music in the Armenian diaspora in the “The Soundscapes of Our Elsewheres,” a conversation with ethnomusicologist Lara Sarkissian. As a music composer, filmmaker, sound artist, and producer, Sarkissian delved into her Armenian experience and examined the ways in which it came to shape her art. Sarkissian discussed music and identity, “I don’t see this as visible or put out there, so why don’t I put this out there for my Iranian Armenian family and stories and see who that connects me to or who finds that also familiar to them.”

Kaveh Askari provided an in-depth study of crime films directed by Samuel Khachikian in “Samuel Khachikian and the Crime Thriller in Iran.” Askari discussed the mixed feelings brought on by the crime film genre in Tehran, Iran in the late 1950s and early 60s by dissecting Khachikian’s work. The small film community of midcentury Iran took part in constituting the global vernacular of film noir where one could according to Askari, “engage the promise of cinema, sometimes with playful enthusiasm about its possibilities and sometimes with a cynicism or anxiety about broken promises.”

FIG 2:

In following a deep dive into an artist’s work, Greg Levonian explores the many forms of home, which permeate William Saroyan’s works. In “William Saroyan’s Dream of Home,” Levonian looks through Saroyan’s works including, “Hello Out There,” “The Time of Your Life,” “The Beautiful People,” and “The Cave Dwellers” to showcase hope for the hopeless and adrift. By analyzing Saroyan’s depictions of home in his works, Levonian depicts hope to symbolize fresh beginnings and possibility – factors which make our existence worthwhile.

Samuel Khachikian

FIG 3:

Arto Vaun recounts visiting the The Parajanov Museum in Yerevan in, “A Museum, a World, a Poem: The Parajanov Museum as an Answer to Disorientation,” where Vaun embraces the artwork of Parajanov and draws deeper connections to his personal experiences and current affairs in Armenia. Sergei Parajanov’s inner world could be seen through his collages displayed in the museum – where his mind was free to roam past his immediate imprisonment and the rules of social realism dictated by the Soviet Union. The Parajanov Museum is one that is the most “soulful and sublime space” for Vaun, who depicts his countless visits to the colorful and full-of-life museum as a comforting space during difficult times. In finding meaning and reason within Parajanov’s art, Vaun adds, “Remember, before anything else, you are simply a human being! Don’t take yourself too seriously, and definitely don’t take others too seriously!” Vaun concludes his article by sharing a poem written at a young age on Parajanov’s “Self-Portrait with Haghpat in the Background, 1963”.

The final full-length article includes, “Performing Ritual, Ritualizing Performance: Objects that Act” by graduate students Elena Gittleman (Bryn Mawr College) and Erin Piñon (Princeton University). Gittleman and Piñon comment on the role of performance in their work and provide a theoretical framework for understanding objects in ritual. In one-part Gittleman and Piñon examine Lenore Tolegian Hughes’s, “A Pictorial Guide to the Badarak or Divine Liturgy of the Armenian Church,” which serves to inform and guide children by providing clear liturgical cues. In continuing their discussion, Piñon and Gittleman show, “the necessity, but also the difficulties, of bridging art history with theology, linguistics, anthropology, and performance studies – fields once considered tangential, or even well beyond it.”

Sergei Parajanov, Self-Portrait with Haghpat in the Backqround, 1963. Published with the permission of the Paraianov Museum, Yerevan, Armenia

FIG 4:

Additionally Hayk Hambardzumyan, Head of Publishing of the Mesrop Mashtoc‘ Institute of Ancient Manuscripts shared the article, “The 2020 Publications of the Mesrop Maštoc‘ Institute of Ancient Manuscripts at the Matendaran in Yerevan, Armenia,” which provided a summary on books published in 2020 by the Institute. Books included in the summary and those from prior years could be read on the digital library section of the Matenadaran website.

In addition to these articles, Volume 28, Issue 1 also contains the following film review: Dana Sajdi’s review of Zeynep Dadak’s “Invisible to the Eye” (Ah Gözel İstanbul). Traditional book reviews included: Tara L. Andrews’ reviews of translations by Robert Bedrosian of various texts from Classical Armenian; Kate Franklin and Ani Honarchian’s review of David Zakarian’s “Women, Too, Were Blessed: The Portrayal of Women in Early Christian Texts”; Vigen Galstyan’s review of Tigran Amiryan’s “Firdus: The Memory of a Place”; Vazken Khatchig Davidian’s review of Gabriella Belli and Edith Devaney’s “Liberating the Artist or Controlling the Narrative? A Review of Arshile Gorky 1904–1948”; Joseph A. Kéchichian’s review of George A. Bournoutian’s “From the Kur to the Aras: A Military History of Russia’s Move into the South Caucasus and the First Russo-Iranian War, 1801–1813”; Sosy Mishoyan Dabbaghian’s review of Hagop Ayvaz’s “My Stage Friends” [in Armenian]; and Christopher Sheklian’s review of Lerna Ekmekçioğlu’s “Recovering Armenia: The Limits of Belonging in Post-Genocide Turkey.”

The journal concluded with final words from Bedross Der Matossian (University of Nebraska, Lincon) in the passage, “In Memoriam, Dr. George Bournoutian (1943–2021).” Der Matossian shared the loss of Professor George Bournoutian, one of the most prominent figures in the Society for Armenian Studies who had been a member since its inception. Bournoutian had played a key role in contributing to the development of modern Armenian history in the West. In speaking of Bournoutian’s legacy, Der Matossian described his scholarship as one that is essential for today and added, “Professor Bournoutian has departed but has left a major legacy, a legacy that future generations will cherish.”

Commenting on this issue Der Matossian, the President of the Society for Armenian Studies said: “The richness of this volume on performance is just breathtaking. It shows how JSAS has become one of the most important mediums for publishing first class articles in the field of Armenian Studies. This would not have taken place without the visionary approach of Tamar M. Boyadjian (Michigan State University) and Rachel Goshgarian (Lafayette College) the Reviews and Reconsiderations Editor. Their dedication and commitment to advancing the field of Armenian Studies is astounding.”

Tamar M. Boyadjian, Michigan State University, continues as the Editor-in-chief. The Reviews and Reconsiderations Editor was Rachel Goshgarian, Lafayette College. The Advisory Board consists of: Bedross Der Matossian, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Barlow Der Mugrdechian, California State University, Fresno; Sergio La Porta, California State University Fresno; Sharon Kinoshita, University of California, Santa Cruz; Jyotsna Singh, Michigan State University; and Alison Vacca, Columbia University.The Editorial Board consists of: Sebouh Aslanian, University of California; Stephan Astourian, University of California, Berkeley; Marie-Aude Baronian, Universiteit van Amsterdam; Houri Berberian, University of California, Irvine; Talar Chahinian, University of California, Irvine; Hratch Tchilingirian, University of Oxford; Myrna Douzjian, University of California, Berkeley; Shushan Karapetian, University of Southern California; David Kazanjian, University of Pennsylvania; Lilit Keshishyan, University of Southern California; Tsolin Nalbantian, Universiteit Leiden; Christina Maranci, Tufts University; Elyse Semerdjian, Whitman College; and Heghnar Watenpaugh, University of California, Davis.

The table of contents for JSAS 28 (1) can be accessed online.

The Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies is a peer-reviewed journal and is published bi-annually by Brill. The Journal can be accessed online. If you are an SAS member, please contact SAS Executive Secretary Katarina Terzyan via email at [email protected] for either a print copy or online access to the volume. Copies of the latest volume, and back issues, are also available by contacting the SAS Executive Secretary, or can be ordered online.