Azerbaijan admits no alternative to Artsakh recognition

Azerbaijan admits no alternative to Artsakh recognition

news.am
October 27, 2012 | 17:40

YEREVAN. – Azerbaijan stated that the world goes on the triumphal
motion of right of people for self-determination, Armenia’s Parliament
deputy Speaker Edward Sharmazanov said commenting on the Azerbaijani
step to recognize the independence of the Southern Sudan.

`Azerbaijan and the Southern Sudan signed a document on regulation of
diplomatic relations. The document testifies that Azerbaijan
recognized the right of people for self-determination. It is necessary
to state that the fact opens a way to the international recognition of
Artsakh [Nagorno-Karabakh], while on the other hand Azerbaijan admits
it has no alternative to Artsakh recognition,’ Sharmazanov claimed.

From: A. Papazian

Serzh Sargsyan visits Dilijan

Serzh Sargsyan visits Dilijan

18:00 27/10/2012 » Economy

Today Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan visited the city of Diljian of
Tavush region, presidential press service said.

President Sargsyan got familiarized with renovation of 12.8 km section
of interstate highway which stretches from Dilijan tunnel to the
city’s bus station.

The construction began on July 28 of this year.

The President was informed that asphalting is completed and the final
works are underway.

According to Armenian Transport Ministry representatives, the highway
will be completely renovated on November 10, 2012, more than one month
earlier than scheduled.

Source: Panorama.am

From: A. Papazian

Russian-Armenian Nationalism

Russian-Armenian Nationalism
X-Sender: Asbed Bedrossian
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 — ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Vahram Martirosyan

Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 15:47:41 – 27/10/2012

On October 20 the famous Russian TV host Mikhail Leontief published an
article entitled `Present Day Armenia Emerged Thanks to Russia’ in the
Odnako which is full of distorted historical facts and insult to our
country. Hundreds of online comments followed the publication. With only a
few exceptions they are in the spirit of imperialistic contempt often
transforming into blunt hatred, adding to insult, barefaced lies.

The answers of Armenian participants are reserved and argumentative.

I wanted to respond but I could not choose where. The first option that
came to my mind was to express my opinion on the same website. That one is
surprised at the Russian blindness. Nobody likes Russians except for some
Russians. Everyone who can leaves Russia. The number of tourists shrinks
quickly. Russian women are viewed in many countries as an easily accessed
commodity for marriage or sexual abuse, the name Natasha is used to
describe a frivolous woman or simply a prostitute, and Carl Lagerfeld even
announced last year in Moscow that Russian men are the ugliest men in the
world and advised the most beautiful women in the world, the Russian women,
to change their sexual orientation to rid of them.

And now the Russian men (involving also women) are settling their accounts
with immigrants from former Soviet provinces whose countries have a ruined
economy and morale due to the failure of the Russian-Bolshevist political
and economic project.

The main idea of comments on the abovementioned article is that the
Russians do not want to see the Armenians in their country. The Armenian
authors of comments do not respond them. After all, they cannot tell their
compatriots not to go to Russia because the latter cannot make both ends
meet in their country. Others do but they want to live a better life.

After a second thought I decided not to write anything in the wasp nest of
Russian chauvinists where every idea would trigger ten times more delirium.
Especially that unlike the Armenian optimists, including my friend Ara
Shirinyan, having worked in Moscow recently I became convinced that
Leontief’s thinking is typical of the majority of Russians. Moreover, the
article by Leontief, Putin’s speakerphone, does not intend to discuss
something to find out the truth but to send a message to Armenia to obey
the Eurasian plan of restoring the USSR (even though we are disgusted by
you) because you cannot survive without us.

The first lesson from the publication in the Odnako is that we must ensure
people’s living in Armenia for them not to have to leave for Russia. With
such a high rate of emigration the president must live at the airport, and
the prime minister must live at the coach station to assure each and every
departure that something will change in the country, and they will live
better. However, the main lesson is the unchanging Russian colonialism
which needs to be addressed. First, in the media. The Russian journalist
wrote something somewhere we have access to. We can more or less respond to
this. However, we are lucky he did not use TV. 13 years ago, after 27
October 1999, during his show Leontief saw President Kocharyan behind the
murderers. In Armenia it produced a strong reaction. Several more similar
shows on the Russian TV channels would lead to Kocharyan’s removal from
power. However, it did not happen because Putin visited Armenia and
supported him. The problem is not the extent to which Kocharyan was
involved in that. The problem is that the Russian TV channel could change
the president of Armenia through our unprotected air who a few years later
gave Armenian companies to Russia in return for the debt. What debt was it?
The interrupted show of Leontief? The Russians did not operate those
companies, and the Armenian side did not demand that they fulfill their
duty.

Leontief’s article got a strong reaction in the Armenian Facebook and
newspapers. Aram Abrahamyan said Russia should be the first to reject the
Eurasian idea because they will bring nothing to the state and people
except a bugbear. There is some irrationality in the continuous arguments
of the Russian government which has been unfortunately typical of this
state through different stages of its history. I think we should not only
notice that irrationality but also take it into consideration when we take
our steps. One of these steps is not to allow brainwash, and not to allow
answer be heard only within the Armenian mountains. Especially that there
is some other kind of irrationalism. `The most painful wound of the
Armenian life is the Russian sentiment. Our proletariat expects only good
things from the Russians, be it the monarch’s stooge, a white or a red.’

This is the alarmed statement of Prime Minister Hamazasp Ohanjanyan of the
First Republic in 1920 when the Russians were to come and save the
Armenians from extermination after pushing us to the verge of destruction.

Situations like 1920, 27 October 1999 may repeat any time. Therefore, it is
necessary to limit free broadcast of foreign TV channels, namely the
speakerphones of the Russian neo-colonialism, as well as the basic cable TV
packages such as U!TV Select where 15 out of 38 channels are Russian
channels. Business interest should not be preferred to state interests.

At the same time, everything must be done to free our TV channels from
slavish psychology and cultural taste.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments27870.html

Republican decides to nominate Serzh Sargsyan’s candidacy

168 Zham: Republican decides to nominate Serzh Sargsyan’s candidacy

tert.am
11:25 – 27.10.12

Tweet The paper says it has learned from sources that the ruling
Republican party of Armenia (RPA) decided at its Friday executive
board meeting to nominate Serzh Sargsyan’s candidacy for next year’s
presidential election at a special meeting on December 19.

A spokesperson for the party, Edward Sharmazanov, reportedly said
after the meeting that they hadn’t considered the possibility
replacing the prime minister. Meantime, he has denied the reports
about plans to transfer the prime minister’s portfolio to the
Prosperous Armenia party (PAP). As for the reported meetings between
President Serzh Sargsyan and the PAP leader, Gagik Tsarukayn,
Sharmazanov said they take place not just for the sheer reason that
Tsarukyan is a member of the National Security Council and the
president of the National Olympic Committee of Armenia.

`The RPA is a champion of democratic values and supports a dialogue
with different forces,’ he was quoted as saying.

From: A. Papazian

La Chine s’engage à une coopération policière plus étroite avec l’Ar

ARMENIE
La Chine s’engage à une coopération policière plus étroite avec l’Arménie

Le conseiller d’Etat chinois Meng Jianzhu a promis vendredi de
promouvoir la coopération avec l’Arménie en matière de maintien de
l’ordre.

M. Meng s’est engagé en ce sens lors de sa rencontre avec Artur
Baghdasaryan, secrétaire du Conseil national de sécurité de l’Arménie.

Selon le conseiller d’Etat, la coopération entre la Chine et l’Arménie
en matière de sécurité et de maintien de l’ordre revêt une importance
particulière, alors que la situation internationale actuelle connaît
de profonds et complexes changements.

`(Nous) espérons que les deux parties renforceront le dialogue et les
échanges d’informations et approfondiront la coopération en termes de
sécurité, de maintien de l’ordre et de secours en cas de catastrophes,
afin de promouvoir la paix, la sérénité et la stabilité dans la région
et le monde entier`, a indiqué M. Meng.

M. Baghdasaryan a expliqué que le gouvernement arménien attachait une
grande importance aux relations avec la Chine et souhaitait collaborer
avec le pays dans divers domaines, notamment le maintien de l’ordre.

Faisant l’éloge des 20 ans de relations diplomatiques entre les deux
pays, M. Meng a indiqué que la Chine et l’Arménie étaient des amis et
partenaires qui se traitaient avec respect et sincérité.

La Chine apprécie l’adhésion de l’Arménie à la politique d’une seule
Chine. Elle salue également le ferme soutien apporté par les arméniens
aux questions importantes touchant la Chine, a-t-il indiqué.

samedi 27 octobre 2012,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

Mexique: polémique sur une statue de l’ancien président de l’Azerbaï

Agence France Presse
24 octobre 2012 mercredi 8:14 AM GMT

Mexique: polémique sur une statue de l’ancien président de l’Azerbaïdjan

MEXICO 24 oct 2012

Entourée de fleurs et de palmiers en bordure du Paseo de la Reforma,
la principale avenue de Mexico, la statue de l’ancien président de
l’Azerbaïdjan, Heydar Aliev, assis genoux croisés, est indifférente au
bruit et à la pollution.

Mais dans une ville ayant élevé des statues à des gloires mondiales
comme Gandhi, Churchill ou Martin Luther King, les défenseurs des
droits de l’homme fulminent contre l’imposant monument installé
récemment à la mémoire de cet ancien chef du KGB, qui a gouverné son
pays d’une poigne de fer entre 1993 et 2003.

On peut lire sur une plaque qu’Aliev était “un grand homme politique
et homme d’Etat”, “un exemple brillant de dévotion infinie à la patrie
et de loyauté aux idéaux universels de la paix mondiale”.

Si Aliev est considéré comme le père de l’indépendance de
l’Azerbaïdjan vis-a-vis de l’Union soviétique, ses détracteurs
rappellent que l’ancien chef du parti communiste local fut l’homme de
la répression contre les dissidents et d’un contrôle strict des
médias. Son fils Ilham lui a succédé et gouverne le pays depuis 2003.

“Mettre sur notre principale avenue la statue d’un dictateur,
quelqu’un qui a violé les droits de l’homme est une offense pour
nous”, dit à l’AFP Jesus Robles Maloof, militant des droits de
l’homme.

Le gouvernement de l’Azerbaïdjan a payé quelque 5 millions de dollars
pour réaménager ce secteur de Chapultepec, le plus grands parc de la
ville, rebaptisé “Parc de l’amitié Mexique-Azerbaïdjan”, ainsi qu’un
autre.

Embarrassé face à une avalanche de critiques, le maire de gauche de
Mexico, Marcelo Ebrard, a créé une commission chargée d’examiner les
plaintes et faire des propositions.

Experts en relations internationales

Cette commission devra aussi décider du sort d’une plaque figurant
dans le deuxième parc et comportant le mot “génocide”, allusion au
massacre d’Azerbaïdjanais dans le village de Khojali, pendant le
conflit avec l’Arménie à propos du Nagorny-Karabakh, dans les années
90.

“Il vaut mieux mettre ça dans les mains d’experts des relations
internationales”, a expliqué à l’AFP Felipe Leal, chargé du
développement urbain à la mairie de Mexico.

Ebard avait inauguré le “Parc de l’amitié” en août, mais les titres
négatifs de la presse ont commencé à apparaître récemment à propos de
la statue située sur l’avenue où domine l’effigie dorée de l’Ange de
l’Indépendance et des monuments à la gloire des héros du pays.

L’ambassadeur d’Azerbaïdjan à Mexico, Ilgar Mukhtarov, a défendu la
décision d’ériger la statue d’Aliev.

“C’est le père de la nation, un symbole de l’Azerbaïdjan et de
l’indépendance”, dit-il à l’AFP. “Ce n’était pas un dictateur”.

Les origines de l’amitié entre les deux pays remontent à 1982 quand
Aliev, qui était alors un officiel soviétique, avait visité le
Mexique, souligne l’ambassadeur. Le Mexique avait été un des premiers
pays à reconnaître l’indépendance de l’Azerbaïdjan.

Il met la polémique sur le compte de la “diaspora arménienne” –
l’Arménie avait soutenu les séparatiste du Nagorny-Karabakh – et “des
gens qui cherchent à nuire aux relations entre l’Azerbaïdjan et le
Mexique”.

Les quelques Mexicains qui sont assis sur des bancs situés en face de
la statue en savent peu sur l’Azerbaïdjan.

“Elle est bien entretenue, très paisible. Je l’aime bien, mais à vrai
dire, je ne le connais pas”, reconnaît Armando Monroy, un coursier de
45 ans. La présence de cette statue lui semble étrange: “Il n’est pas
aussi connu que Gandhi”.

From: A. Papazian

No need of Yerevan-Baku direct contacts, expert says

No need of Yerevan-Baku direct contacts, expert says

tert.am
20:00 – 28.10.12

The current format of talks over Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement
is enough for maintaining ties between Yerevan and Baku, political
scientist Hrant Melik-Shahnazaryan said speaking to Tert.am,
commenting on the recent publication of the Huffington Post – 7
Lessons of Cuban crisis for Karabakh conflict – that claims about
necessity of direct communication between Yerevan and Baku.

`Political contacts are more than enough. Azerbaijani president is one
of the leaders our president often meets with. Thus, there is no issue
in regard of political contacts,’ he said.

`As to other types of cooperation, it should be noted that their
absence has objective reasons, with the most important of them Baku’s
continuing Armenophobia policy being a priority there,’ the expert
said.

Levon Shiriniyan, another political scientist, says for him the
establishment of direct ties is acceptable and necessary but it is
impossible as of the moment.

`Turks will not establish ties in this situation, if the balance is
violated and they appear in complicated condition, they will undertake
any mean step,’ he said. `The creation of direct ties would have
allowed to avoid accidents. We do not have it now, instead it is being
done by mediators and they always come forth from their interests,’
the analyst said.

Referring to the current contacts between the leaders of the two
countries, Levon Shirinyan said it is a courtesy gesture.

The expert said they are being forced to it by the big powers, and non
participation of any of the sides would mean ignoring and appearing as
aggressor.

Shirinyan agreed with the American publication that currently neither
of the conflicting parties has military excellence. He said that is
why peace has been preserved for 21 years.

`Azerbaijan is being armed, sells oil, but does not reach superiority.
It means we are playing well and we are quite strong,’ he said.

`The contrary evidence of it would be if Azerbaijan passed to military
actions. But it knows quite well that it cannot overcome Armenia. The
situation must continue until Azerbaijan is imposed peace,’ Shirinyan
said, stressing tha the time for it will come.

Political analyst Hrant Melik-Shahnazaryan is convinced that the
advantage is on the Armenian side.

`As far as we are able to solve our minimal issues – ensure the
security of our country – and Azerbaijan fails to solve the issue it
has put in front of it – to occupy Artsakh Republic – the advantage is
on our side,’ he said.

Melik-Shahnazaryan said though Azerbaijan is trying to present its
military expenditures as an achievement or advantage over Armenia and
Karabakh, the statements are more of propagating nature than have a
real impact on the balance of forces.

He said today Armenia’s ammunition allows to easily stop any
encroachment by Azerbaijan. The analyst said Azerbaijan will
immediately start war if it is convinced in its victory.

`As far as there is no such conviction, Azerbaijan continues acting in
the field of populist speculations. We do not have unprotected
positions today and each village and territory is under stable
protection,’ he said.

From: A. Papazian

Postcard from … Singapore

Postcard from … Singapore

October 19, 2012 7:18 pm

By Peter Hughes

Raffles celebrates its 125th birthday, still standing for fabled
memories with the splendour of colonial architecture When the Duke and
Duchess of Cambridge began their tour of southeast Asia in Singapore
last month, there was only one place they could stay: Room 244, the
Presidential Suite, at Raffles, one of the few accommodations in the
world to which one doesn’t need to append the word hotel. If they had
stayed a couple of days longer, they could have joined the
celebrations for Raffles’ 125th birthday.

Somerset Maugham said Raffles stood for `all the fables of the exotic
east’. It certainly still stands for fabled memories. Its pillared
halls of snowy stucco, louvred shutters, long verandas and fans
spinning from high ceilings; the jade green balustrades, floors of
dark hardwoods and courtyard gardens represent all the dash, space and
splendour of colonial architecture at its most self-assured.

The hotel opened on Beach Road in 1887 as a 10-room guest house in a
bungalow acquired by the Sarkies, four enterprising Armenian brothers.
They named it, like much else in the city, after Singapore’s founder,
Sir Stamford Raffles. The property quickly expanded with the addition
of two wings and the famous billiard room. The story goes that the
last wild tiger in Singapore was shot beneath it in 1902 (in those
days the building was raised on pillars).

In 1899 Raffles gained its noble portico but the wing with the suite
in which I stayed was completed six years earlier. Raffles has suites,
not rooms, and there are only 103 of them. They manage to combine the
era of chaises longues with the world of air-conditioning and (free)
WiFi. Quaintly, the dining-cum-sitting rooms are called parlours.

The birthday was celebrated with a dinner of Brittany turbot and
Mayura beef tenderloin cooked by a Michelin two-star chef in Raffles
Grill, one of 15 bars and restaurants. It’s a room that only 20 years
ago had its fireplace removed as being somewhat superfluous in a
climate where the daytime temperature seldom drops much below 30C.

These days the hotel also offers to arrange VIP airport treatment for
its guests. I was met at the aircraft door by a petite airport
employee in tailored brown uniform, and bustled on to an electric golf
cart. I felt as if I had been gathered into the charge of one of those
corps of brisk Asiatic girls from a James Bond movie.

`Excuse me. Coming through,’ called the Bond girl to anyone oblivious
of our approach as the buggy sped through 3km of Changi’s termini.
Every known brand of watch, pen, camera and luggage flickered through
my consciousness. It was as if I was being fast-forwarded into some
shiny new consumer universe. No wonder Raffles, and the hushed
interior of the hotel Bentley complete with flagstaff, seemed like
sanctuaries.

I had forgotten how big the Raffles building is. I was shown the
Presidential Suite, which is so spacious it contains a dining table to
seat 12, as well as two bedrooms, a drawing room and a library. Among
the Dickens and books on Asian art was a paperback entitled The
Queen’s Fool. Perhaps the duchess left it.

Customs persist: the antique grandfather clock in the foyer is wound
every morning; the silver dinner wagon, buried for safety during the
second world war, is still used for roasts in the Grill, and peanut
shells are still chucked on the floor in the Long Bar, where the
Singapore Sling was invented.

A butler on the veranda of the Raffles Hotel
But Singapore has little sentiment for tradition. Land reclamation,
for instance, has left Beach Road almost 2km from the sea. Raffles’
cleverest trick has been to retain its antiquity while still keeping
up with its arriviste competitors. Twenty years ago it closed for 18
months for renovation, and another bout of modernisation is about to
be announced.

What would the Sarkies brothers build today? The £3.6bn Marina Bay
Sands, perhaps. Its 2,561 rooms certainly trump a 10-room guest house.
Balanced across the tops of three 57-floor towers, with concave faces,
sits what appears to be the hull of a huge boat, an ark come to rest
upon a man-made Ararat. In fact this is Sky Park, an extraordinary
city garden high above the thrumming financial district.

I asked how big it is and got a gnomic Singaporean answer. `It’s the
length of four and a half Airbus A380s,’ said my guide. Translated,
that equals 340m – enough room for almost 4,000 people, two
restaurants, woodland and a pool. Immediately below is Gardens by the
Bay, a 101-hectare park on the same expanse of reclaimed land as the
hotel. Singapore, which used to call itself a garden city, is now
proclaiming itself as a city in a garden.

As I waited for a taxi back to the hotel, a man in the queue next to
me beamed. `Singapore’s latest new project,’ he said, gazing proudly
at the park. `What’s next?’ I asked. He pondered for a moment before
saying: `I don’t know, but there is always something.’

In a place where new means already ageing, and the present is just a
turnstile to the future, how does Raffles survive? Only, I suspect,
because old is now such a novelty that it counts as new. Raffles will
be 250 years old in 2137. By then it may be 8km from the sea and
encased in a biodome, but it will still be there.

Peter Hughes was a guest of Singapore Airlines ()
and Wexas Travel () which offers four nights at Raffles,
flights from London and private transfers, from £1,770

From: A. Papazian

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/49777786-144e-11e2-8cf2-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2AbJsbuom
www.singaporeair.com
www.wexas.com

112 economic entities fined by Armenian antitrust agency in Jan-Sept

112 economic entities fined by Armenian antitrust agency in Jan-Sept 2012

YEREVAN, October 26. /ARKA/. Armenia’s State Commission for Protection
of Economic Competition has fined 112 economic entities for the first
nine months of this year, Artak Shaboyan, the chairman of the
commission, said Friday as met with Ukrainian Ambassador to Armenia
Ivan Kukhta.

He said that the number of such decisions is growing from year to
year. The commission made 31 decisions in 2008, 25 in 2009, 106 in
2010 and 198 in 2011.

Shaboyan told the ambassador that the fine size has grown as well –
from AMD 3 million in 2008 to AMD 351 million in 2012.
He also said that 20 decisions were appealed in 2011 and five in 2012.
Of them, 17 remained in force and seven are still in court. Not a
single decision of the commission has been voided by court.

Kukhta, on his side, said that Ukraine is interested in a closer
cooperation between the two countries’ antitrust agencies. This will
strengthen also trade and economic ties between the countries. -0-

From: A. Papazian

Armenia’s FM meets Minsk Group co-chairs, Azeri counterpart

Armenia’s FM meets Minsk Group co-chairs, Azeri counterpart

tert.am
10:25 – 28.10.12

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian met October 27 with the
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group Robert Bradtke, Igor Popov and
Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman in Office Andrzej
Kasprzyk.

Afterwards the meeting was joined by the Azerbaijani Foreign Minister
Elmar Mammadyarov, Armenia’s Foreign Ministry press service reports.

The co-chairs stressed the necessity of reducing the tension between
the parties. As a working proposal they have presented their ideas
over the peaceful settlement of the conflict.

The ministers reiterated their commitment to continue the joint work
with the co-chairs over peaceful settlement of the conflict.

The ministers and co-chairs agreed to continue the discussions over
the ideas during the regional visit of the co-chairs in November.

From: A. Papazian