ABSENCE OF ENVOY RATHER US PROBLEM
news.az
Aug 10 2010
Azerbaijan
Rahman Hajiyev The appointment of the US envoy in Baku has remained
the main agenda of the US-Azerbaijani relations for several months.
As is known, the position of the US ambassador in Azerbaijan has
remained vacant for a year since the completion of the term of
ambassador Anne Derse who left Azerbaijan in July 2009.
Though some experts mostly link the absence of the envoy with purely
technical aspects of the procedure of appointment of US diplomats,
in reality, such a long delay can be explained by political motives.
As is known, Azerbaijan’s position on two “US” projects of the last
year-the Turkish-Armenian rapprochement and Iranian issue clearly
differed from the one that was prepared by US strategists for him.
Baku has made it clear on the Iranian issue that its participation in
any operations against the southern neighbor is merely impossible. In
addition, Azerbaijani officials have repeatedly stressed the friendly
relations between Tehran and Baku.
The second US regional project on the opening of the Armenian-Turkish
border on which the consensus seems to have been reached between all
concerned parties (including Russia, US, Armenia and even Turkey)
was, in turn, suspended due to irreconcilability of Baku that clearly
stated the impossibility to open borders between Turkey and Armenia
without parallel resolution of the Karabakh conflict or at least
serious achievements in the peace process (later the United States
admitted that these two processes cannot be separated and they must
go on par-author).
The Turkish-Armenian rapprochement gripped in Azerbaijan’s vice has
been frustrated by Armenia itself.
First the Constitutional Court of this country released the full
text of the resolution on protocols fixing the regulations with
prerequisites as well as formulations contradicting to the spirit
and contest of protocols. Later Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan
passed a decision to suspend the ratification of the two protocols
signed by Yerevan and Ankara in Zurich in October of the last year
thus showing its nonconstructiveness.
Undoubtedly, this foreign policy of Azerbaijan annoyed the United
States. In addition, this was accompanied by some single-time
complications in energy sphere.
Turkey, which is the main artery of the West for pumping energy
sources to Europe, failed to agree with Azerbaijan on gas tariffs.
Meanwhile, in line with national interests Azerbaijan continued
searches of alternative markets to sell its gas.
The agreement with Russian Gazprom which expressed wish to purchase
as much gas as Azerbaijan can supply has become one of the variants.
Throughout the whole period of “confrontation”, Azerbaijan has
repeatedly urged the United States to review its priorities in the
region and pay attention to Azerbaijan as one of the most important
partners in spheres of energy, security and fighting international
terrorism.
In the result, there appeared a thaw in the relations between the
countries dating to the climatic warming.
Azerbaijan and Turkey agreed on gas issue in spring 2010.
The due agreement between the parties was signed in early June. The
contract fixed the price of sale of Azerbaijani gas to Turkey, as
well as the cost of its transit to Europe, which means Azerbaijan
is among the most real suppliers of gas for Nabucco, lobbied by the
United States.
Head of Pentagon Robert Gates paid an official visit to Azerbaijan too.
It does not matter whether the coincidence of the two crucial events
was at random. It is more important that Gates has come to Baku
with a “button” to restart the relations between the United States
and Azerbaijan.
In this case the message of Obama in which the US leader tried
to explain the important contribution of Azerbaijani partners in
international anti-terror coalition played a role of a button.
In addition, Obama recognized Azerbaijan’s leadership in regional
processes and stressed Azerbaijan’s contribution to regional energy
security.
The US president voiced confidence that the complex issues between
the countries will be settled.
The restart button has been pressed and we had to wait for the results
which took not too long to appear.
The next visit of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the region
brought more confidence that the new US administration, reviewing
the situation in the region, has taken a right decision to continue
the course of restarting relations with Azerbaijan.
The priorities of relations with Azerbaijan, indicated by Clinton,
have clearly illustrated the intentions of restart. She listed the
resolution of the Karabakh conflict, regional security and raising
Azerbaijan’s sovereignty, as well as the development of human capital
among the main trends of development of ties between Washington
and Baku.
But it should be noted that this all occurred on the background of
the absence of the due level of US communications in Baku. The US
envoy in Azerbaijan was not appointed yet.
Undoubtedly, the absence of the ambassador is more a problem of the
United States than Azerbaijan but it cannot stay unnoticed in the
Azerbaijani side since sound relations can hardly be built without
due communications.
In addition, the absence of the “main” US diplomat in the country can
be regarded either as a proof of the insufficiently serious approach
to partner relations or as a result of the resistance of concerned
parties to the establishment of ties between our countries.
I think both moments were present in this case.
In turn, it should be noted that Bryza’s candidacy for the post of
the US embassy in Azerbaijan nominated by Persident Obama has faced
the unprecedented black PR campaign organized by the Armenian diaspora.
The campaign launched by the Armenian National Committee of America
was supported by the “lawyers” of Armenians who accused Bryza of
almost all sins. He was accused of being incompetent as a diplomat,
failures of the US policy in the region and even the war between Russia
and Georgia. In other words, this was a whole set of accusations.
The Armenian diaspora and lobby have chosen the Senate as the main
target of their influence. They have sufficient methods of influencing
this body.
These are the so-called representatives of the interests of their
(pro-Armenian) sponsors-congressmen and senators like Frank Pallone
and the permissibility of lobbying interests with the use of the
financial tool…
Anyway, the Senate hampered Bryza’s appointment by results of
discussions in the Committee of International Affairs of the US Senate
putting it off for at least a few months.
This “attack” against Bryza showed the way a state (in this case
Armenia, in the face of its US supporters) can influence the
relations of the United States with their crucial regional partner
whose importance was stressed by both the president and the Secretary
of State.
The State Department and the White House admitted the need to build
relations of the new level with Azerbaijan and thereby indicated the
sphere of national interests of US in the South Caucasus…
Nonetheless, the US national interests turned out to be on the back
burner due to the shortcomings in the US political system based on
the so-called checks and balances principles.
As is known, curbing of a branch of power with two others is the
main postulate of this system but the architects of the US political
system hardly created these balances to curb implementation of national
interests in different parts of the world.
Anyway, the Azerbaijani light blinking on the US radar of the South
Caucasus started to dim again under the influence of different
concerned groupings tending to hamper the restarting process of the
US-Azerbaijani relations by all means.
It is a matter of time whether Obama’s administration will be able
to resist this impact and bring the relations with Azerbaijan to a
new level not only on words but also in action.
But one thing is clear by 100%-the real cooperation with Azerbaijan
complies with the real national interests of the United States and it
is not limited to the role of Azerbaijan in the anti-terror campaign
in Afghanistan (which is undoubtedly invaluable). Meanwhile, the
development of US relations with the South Caucasus is impossible
without Azerbaijan.
Azerbaijan is an unquestionable leader of the region, its gate to the
energy rich Caspian Sea located between Russia and Iran and connecting
the West and the East and Islamic world with the European citilization.
Azerbaijan is likely the most stable US partner both in economic and
political issues which has repeatedly been proven within many years
of cooperation.
Time will show whether the executive branches of US power will have
a strength to remove curbing on the part of the groupings influencing
the Senate…
Or will this curbing remain without due resistance?
From: A. Papazian