Teenage girl beaten and arrested by Iranian regime agents

NCR-Iran.org (press release)
Dec 5 2010

Teenage girl beaten and arrested by Iranian regime agents .

Sunday, 05 December 2010 09:59 .NCRI – A 14-year-old girl was
severely beaten on Friday in Esfahan by the Iranian regime’s
paramilitary Bassij Forces, according to obtained reports.

Eyewitness accounts indicate that the teenage girl of Armenian origin
was stopped by a group of Bassij suppressive agents as she was walking
on Nazar Street in Esfahan in the morning hours. The agents insisted
that she was not adequately veiled and sought to detain her.

The young girl, however, resisted, which provoked other youths to get
involved to try to dissuade the agents from detaining the girl.

But, according to eyewitnesses, a State Security Forces (SSF) unit
arrived on the scene to provide back up to the Bassij agents, who
violently dispersed the population and detained the girl as they beat
her.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/human-rights/9391-teenage-girl-beaten-and-arrested-by-iranian-regime-agents

Swiss Ambasssador Gunther Bechler presented credentials to Sargsyan

President.am, Armenia
Dec 5 2010

The Ambassador of Switzerland to Armenia Gunther Bechler presented his
credentials to President Serzh Sargsyan

Today, the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Switzerland
to the Republic of Armenia Gunther Bechler presented his credentials
to President Serzh Sargsyan.

Serzh Sargsyan congratulated the Swiss Ambassador on his appointment
and underlined that our country is interested in deepening relations
with the Swiss Confederation which can be promoted considerably by the
unfolding active dialogue between the two states.

President Sargsyan expressed gratitude to the Swiss Government for
assistance provided to our country, recognition of the Armenian
Genocide, and creation of favorable conditions for the viability of
the Armenian community.

Along with the issues pertaining to the development of bilateral
relations, the parties spoke also about regional issues. Ambassador
Gunther Bechler stressed that Switzerland would continue with its
efforts aimed at the establishment and enforcement of peace in the
region.

From: A. Papazian

Review & Outlook – 12/06/2010

SEVERAL SKETCHES FROM THE LIFE OF ARMENIANS IN SWITZERLAND

by David Petrosian

December 6, 2010

A short 4-day trip to attend a seminar of experts in Geneva
provided an opportunity for me to familiarize myself with the life and
organization of the Armenian community in Switzerland, in particular,
of its French-speaking part.

HISTORY

The first references to Switzerland in Armenian sources date
back to the second half of the 15th century. The matter concerns
Bishop Martiros Yerznkatsi’s work about his journey to the country of
Franks. In 17th and 18th centuries the first Armenian merchants from
neighboring Germany and France as well as Constantinople appeared in
Switzerland. From the second half of the 19th century Armenian
students started to arrive in Switzerland to study at universities of
Basel, Lausanne, Geneva, Zurich and Fribourg. Let us remind that
Armenian writers and poets such as Ruben Sevak, Avetik Isahakian, and
Derenik Demirchian, the publicist Grigor Artsruni, and the future
Catholicos and Supreme Patriarch of All Armenians Khoren Muradbekian
pursued their studies here.

The first Armenian community in Switzerland was created in 1907
by students in Lausanne.

The oldest Armenian political party – the Social Democrat
Hunchak (Bell) Party was founded in 1887 at the Landolt Café by
Armenian students of the University of Geneva (by Avetis Nazarbekian,
Maro Vardanian, Kristafor Ohanian, Ruben Khanazatian, Gabriel Kafian
and others). In Geneva, Armenian social democrats published their
official newspaper, Hunchak until 1891. From 1891 to 1914 the European
Bureau of another traditional Armenian party – Armenian Revolutionary
Federation – Dashnaktsutyun (ARFD) was based in Geneva, releasing its
official newspaper Droshak. The presence of a well-organized community
and offices of Armenian political parties was conducive to the fact
that in March 1897 the Swiss government officially condemned the
Armenian massacres committed in the Ottoman Empire in 1894-1896.

The Swiss Office of the Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU)
presently headed by Talin Avagian has operated since 1910. The Swiss
Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church was established in 1969, with
its center in St. Hakob Church.

TODAY

The form of the organization of Switzerland’s Armenian
communities scattered over various cities and cantons has partly been
determined by the confederative political structure of that country.
However, more than half of the Armenian community in Switzerland (some
5 thousand people) lives in Geneva, Lausanne (about 3 thousand
Armenians live in these two cities), Bern, and Zurich. In the
mentioned cities the Armenian communities are organized in the best
way, with their schools, periodicals, Internet sites, cultural groups,
including dance groups and choirs, for example, Ani and Arax. There
are various youth, sports and women’s unions, organizations uniting
Armenians of the same profession, first of all doctors, businessmen,
and engineers, also organizations engaged in political activity. Small
Armenian groups live in Locarno, Basel, Lugano, Baden, Aarau, Rheineck,
Ticino, Kreuzlingen and other cities. Interestingly, the
Oberentfelden-based small Armenian community has managed to create the
Masis-Aarau football club which is one of the daughter teams of the FC
Aarau.

In addition to the above mentioned, we should also point out the
following organizational structures of the Armenian community: the
Union of Armenians in Switzerland founded in 1947, the Switzerland-
Armenia Association and the Forum of Armenians in Switzerland founded
in 1997, and the newspaper and Internet site Ardzagank.

On 16 December 2003 the Swiss parliament recognized the Armenian
Genocide committed in the Ottoman Turkey during World War I. Not only
does this legal act reflect the corresponding moods in the political
establishment of Switzerland, but it is also the result of efficient
activities of all Switzerland-based Armenian organizations without
exception. It is known that as a result of the Genocide’s recognition,
relevant amendments were made to the Swiss legislation, and there have
already been court rulings on cases of persons of Turkish descent who
denied the fact of the Armenian Genocide during World War I.

At the same time Switzerland, a country to have recognized the
Genocide, is a consistent supporter of and mediator in the
normalization process of Armenian-Turkish relations.

In order to understand `the technology of the life’ of the
Armenian community, let us examine the activities of a small Armenian
organization – the Association of Armenian Women of Geneva. The
Association’s committee is composed of 8 persons representing several
generations. Every second month the Association publishes a small
bulletin in French and Armenian to provide information about work of
the organization. Besides, the bulletin contains a lot of information
about the life of the Armenian community: from advertisements of
companies owned by Armenians to the political analysis of the
Armenian-Turkish Protocols, from announcements of concerts, weddings
and festivities to a detailed schedule of the meetings between the
congregation and the priest of the Armenian Apostolic Church in
German-speaking cantons of Zurich and Neuchatel from November 14 to
January 23, and even information on where lavash for 8 francs a kilo
can be bought ().

We gave such a thorough description of the bulletin’s contents
in order to show how links within the community are formed and how
they function – hence the cohesion and orderliness of the community.
In addition, this once again confirms the axiom that the efficiency of
a community’s political lobbying largely depends on its cohesion,
orderliness and purposefulness, and to a lesser degree – on the number
of community members.

PERSON

Naturally, when speaking about the Armenian community of
Switzerland, one cannot but mention those persons who are integral
part of the community. At first I was going to tell about some
well-off people who have succeeded in business or about those who have
won recognition in the spheres of art, medicine, science and
technology. Yet I decided to tell you about my colleague, who is
probably one of the most talented journalists in the Armenian Diaspora
– about Vicken Cheterian.

V. Cheterian was born 43 years ago in Beirut where he finished a
gymnasium, then graduated from the American University earning a
bachelor’s degree in English language and literature. Since 1989 he
has worked in journalism, although he began his career as a translator
from Arabic into English. In the 1990s he conducted interviews and
wrote a series of reports and analytical materials on conflicts in the
North and South Caucasus, which appeared in leading publications of
Europe, including: Switzerland (Neue Zeurcher Zeitung, WochnZeitung,
and Die Weltwoche), France (Le Mond Diplomatique), Denmark
(Information), and Great Britain (Al Hayat). Cheterian visited Nagorno
Karabakh and Abkhazia several times during the wars in the 1990s, and
he was in Chechnya before the first war. In the 1990s he wrote a
number of reports from the Balkans, particularly from Serbia. Then, in
the mid 1900s, the range of his professional interests widened and he
would often travel to Central Asia, especially to Uzbekistan,
Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan.

Cheterian is fluent in four languages: Armenian, Arabic, English
and French. He also knows German, Russian (a bit), and, in his words,
he can keep up a simple conversation in Turkish for 10-15 minutes.

Vicken has authored several books, including a Russian-language
book `Small Wars and Big Games’ that came out in Yerevan in 2003. His
latest book `War and Peace in the Caucasus: Russia’s Troubled
Frontier’ was published last year by prestigious publishing houses of
London and New York. The journalist is currently gathering material
for his new book, this time about the Middle East. It is quite
possible that the main object of his study will be Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi, an international terrorist who was killed in 2006 in Iraq
where he, most probably, headed Al-Qaeda’s local cell. This Jordanian
is believed to have masterminded all major terrorist attacks in
Iraq. The biography of al-Zarqawi is a little-studied spot in the
world’s social and political journalism. Apparently, Vicken wants to
eliminate this `blank’ spot.

A few years ago V. Cheterian defended his doctoral thesis at the
Geneva Institute of International Affairs. He is one of the founders
and instructors of the Caucasus Media Institute (currently the
Caucasus Institute). He, together with his wife Karen and children,
lived in the capital city of Armenia for a few years.

His wife Karen is a Swiss citizen of French descent, a graduate
of the University of Zurich. She currently holds a responsible post at
the Geneva Municipality and is a prominent functionary of the Green
Party of the city. The Greens want her to become the city mayor or an
MP. However, Karen has not yet agreed to these initiatives as the
children are still young. The couple has three boys: Varuzhan born in
1996, Jivan (1999) and Noe/Noah (2006). The boys and their mother
speak fluent Armenian.

A skilled journalist, a good narrator and an excellent analyst,
Vicken is fully aware of how this or that event in our region is
perceived in the West and the East. He is one of those intellectuals
who form public and expert opinions worldwide about the situation in
our region. The intellectuals, patriots and workaholics like Vicken
Cheterian make up the `golden fund’ of not only the Armenian Diaspora,
but also the new generation.

“The Noyan Tapan Highlights”, N45 December, 2010


David Petrosyan is a political analyst in Yerevan, Armenia, and
writes a regular weekly column in Noyan Tapan. He also provides
weekly analyses to the Armenian service of SBS Radio in Australia,
and written for a variety of Russian language political newspapers.

*******************************************************************
The Entertainment Wire:
The Critical Corner:
The Literary Groong:
Review & Outlook:
World News:

© Copyright 2010 Armenian News Network/Groong. All Rights Reserved.

From: A. Papazian

http://lavashbio.ch
http://www.groong.org/ew/
http://www.groong.org/tcc/
http://www.groong.org/tlg/
http://www.groong.org/ro/
http://www.groong.org/world/

Azerbaijani Official Enjoys Sizable Incomes: Wikileaks

AZERBAIJANI OFFICIAL ENJOYS SIZABLE INCOMES: WIKILEAKS

Tert.am
03.12.10

Wikileaks continues the publication of scandalous materials.

It has recently leaked a cable which is the second in a series that
profiles the most powerful families in Azerbaijan, both in terms
of economic and political power. This issue features Minister of
Emergency Situations Kamaladdin Heydarov and his family. Heydarov
was previously Chairman of the State Customs Committee, and his
hand-picked successor now operates that agency, one of the most
corrupt operations in Azerbaijan. The Heydarov family, which controls
a business empire in Azerbaijan ranging from fruit juice production
to real estate development, is the second most powerful commercial
family in Azerbaijan, after the Pashayev family (into which President
Aliyev married).

Man striving for power

Kamaladdin Heydarov is the most powerful member of this family,
and some observers have said he might be even more powerful than
the President himself. His father, Fattah Heydarov, is a Member of
Parliament from the mountainous Qabala district, which serves as a home
base for the family outside Baku. Fattah was Secretary of the Ordubad
(and later Julfa) District Party Committee during Soviet times, and
served as Minister of the Welfare Service of Nakhchivan from 1976 to
1978 and later as Nakhchivan’s Minister of Culture from 1983 to 1995.

Kamaladdin Heydarov was Chairman of the State Customs Committee for
nine years, and since 2006 has been head of the para-military Ministry
of Emergency Situations (MES), which acts as a super-Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Fire Marshall, health and safety inspector, and
overall regulator of many aspects of the economy. Born in 1961, he
holds a degree in Geology and International Law from the Azerbaijan
State University. He held executive positions in a number of private
and public enterprises prior to his appointment at the ripe old age of
35 as Chairman of the State Customs Committee (SCC), an agency that is
notoriously corrupt, even by Azerbaijani standards. Heydarov’s rise to
power was partly a result of the strong relationship between his father
Fattah and former President Heydar Aliyev (also from Nakhchivan),
but also partly a result of Heydarov’s strong management skills. As
he gained wealth for the ruling party, Heydar Aliyev’s respect for
him grew, until finally he was entrusted with the valuable role of
Chairman of the SCC.

The State Customs position allowed him to gain his massive wealth,
as significant illicit payments were paid “up the food chain” in an
elaborate and well-orchestrated system of payoff and patronage.

Heydarov likely still enjoys a sizeable income from the SCC, as it
is controlled by his loyal successor. When President Ilham Aliyev
appointed Heydarov as Minister of Emergency Situations in 2006,
he was replaced at the SCC by his Deputy Aydin Aliyev. Aydin Aliyev
is not related to President Aliyev, and Heydarov is Aydin Aliyev’s
sole benefactor, a symbiotic relationship in which Aliyev presumably
gives undying loyalty (and a hefty cut) to the powerful Heydarov in
order to retain his position. When Charge first met Heydarov in 2007,
the Minister had been in office for less than a year but had a chest
full of military ribbons that would rival the U.S. Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs. Presumably he transferred them directly from his old
State Customs uniform.

The Ministry of Everything Significant (MES)

The Ministry of Emergency Situations (MES) has consistently proven
itself to be one of the most powerful ministries in Azerbaijan. It is
suspected to have the largest revenue of any Ministry. It even has its
own para-military unit, consistent with other such ministries in the
CIS. Heydarov mentioned to a visiting Washington VIP in 2008 that his
ministry had recently taken control of an anti-aircraft battery near
Baku in which he had served as a young conscript during Soviet times.

The Ministry now controls the fire departments and other emergency
services, fire code inspections, state grain reserves, and construction
licensing. This last area of responsibility (perhaps the most important
for foreign entities operating in Azerbaijan) also covers building
inspectors who can interfere with, delay, or stop any construction
project they declare to be “unsafe.” In fact, MES staff have previously
warned American and other foreign businessmen that their purview covers
anything that is associated with temperature, pressure, or isotopes —
categories broadly interpreted to include just about everything under
the sun.

It is often said mockingly that in Azerbaijan’s judicial system, one
can only win a case if one is friends with the judge – or if introduced
by Benjamin Franklin (read: significant cash). Of course being known
to the judge as politically powerful is another path to courtroom
victory. The path to certifying a building’s safety is likely similar,
and the true structural integrity of Baku’s recent construction
boom is suspect. In 2007, a multi-story high-rise under construction
crashed to the ground, killing several workers. In January 2010, three
workers were killed when they fell from a building under construction
on high-rent Neftchiler Prospect (reftel). Suspect construction is
widespread in Baku, as new, speculative real estate ventures in
central Baku (including high-rise buildings) are largely vacant,
while practical buyers bid up the prices of flats in “Stalin-ka”
buildings that pre-date independence. These older buildings, which
tend to be low-rise, are thought to have had higher construction
standards and generally be safer and more dependable.

These types of market developments do not bode well for the reputation
of MES, which is widely viewed as a cash cow for Baku’s elite, and the
Heydarov family in particular. If an event such as an earthquake led to
widespread destruction of property, it is assumed that outrage would
be private, rather than public, and would not boil over into attacks
on contractors or corrupt bureaucrats, as was the case after the 1999
earthquake in Istanbul. Some less powerful contractors would become
easy targets, but the true architects of disaster such as Heydarov’s
MES would find a way to use its resources and the tools of the state
to escape any reprisal.

His Boys and Their Toys

Kamaladdin’s two sons, Nijat Heydarov and Tale Heydarov, have recently
expressed a desire to purchase two Gulfstream jets, valued at $20
million each. The family also owns an Airbus A319 corporate jet that
is presently undergoing cabin completion in Basel, Switzerland.

According to initial reports, ownership of the Gulfstreams would be
shared between “Shams al Sahra FZCO” (registered in Dubai to Tale and
Nijat) and Mr. Manouchehr Ahadpur Khangah, with Shams al Sahra and
Kangah each holding 50 percent of each jet. Khangah was not previously
known to the Embassy, but according to information from Gulfstream
appears to be a citizen of both Iran and Azerbaijan (unclear if he also
holds other passports). Purportedly as part of Patriot Act compliance,
Gulfstream asked the Heydarovs for information that would confirm
the lawful sources of their wealth. The BAKU 00000127 003 OF 004
Heydarovs provided Gulfstream an overview of their family holdings,
and it appears they own more businesses than any other Azerbaijani
family, including companies in food canning, construction materials,
concrete, asphalt, chemicals, bricks, textiles, CD and DVD production
(since licensed CDs or DVDs are generally unavailable on the local
market, these are certainly all pirated), milk processing, tourism,
gypsum materials, leather, agriculture, pianos, alcohol and spirits,
juices, banking, insurance, and construction.

One Embassy contact, a prominent Iranian businessman in Baku,
referred to Khangah as the Chief Executive Officer or “front man”
of a substantial portion of the Heydarov family conglomerate. This
contact noted that while Khangah is listed as the official owner
of various businesses, they are very much Heydarov-owned operations
in which Khangah functions more as a manager. This source added that
Khangah’s role was mirrored by an unnamed Turkish citizen who controls
another segment of the family businesses.

Many of the family’s operations are part of the “Gilan,” “Qabala,”
“Jala,” or “United Enterprises International (UEI)” family of
companies. Gilan Holdings is omnipresent in Baku, as the company
is one of several major real estate developers and has been in the
forefront of Baku’s highly speculative real estate market. Observers
compare Gilan to Dubai World or Nakheel, although admittedly on a
smaller scale. The Heydarovs have largely cornered the fruit juice
market in Azerbaijan, maintaining extremely high prices for locally
produced juices and watered-down juice drinks, while making life
difficult — with the help of State Customs — for cheaper competitors
from Turkey, Ukraine and Russia. When USAID tried to support the
production and distribution of pomegranate products in Azerbaijan,
they quickly learned that no one sells pomegranate juice, concentrate,
or derivatives from Azerbaijan without Heydarov’s permission.

Azerbaijan’s economy is largely dominated by monopolistic interests,
and observers suggest that the Heydarovs are at the top of this
mountain of non-competition. It is rumored that the Heydarovs also
have interests in the local Pepsi bottler, the local license for Red
Bull, British American Tobacco, Japan Tobacco, and Imperial Tobacco.

Heydarov has readily admitted to visiting U.S. delegations that he owns
and operates the Caspian Fish Company which controls the lucrative
(and previously Russian Mafia-controlled) Beluga Caviar production
in Azerbaijan.

The Heydarovs are also active in cultural endeavors. Kamaladdin
Heydarov is a composer and has written a song about former President
Heydar Aliyev that was sung by Azeri singer Aghadadash Aghayev. His
wife is ethnic Korean, and he himself is quite the Koreaphile; he
is President of the Azerbaijan Taekwondo Federation and owner of the
recently opened high-end Korean restaurant “Shilla.” Korean diplomats
have confirmed that Heydarov was the protector for several major
business deals, but have complained that many of these deals have
gone awry after the Korean firms refused to pay adequate patronage
to Heydarov.

Heydarov’s son Tale is the President of The European Azerbaijan Society
(TEAS), and has made rounds to U.S. embassies in European capitals
from his London base. The “society” purports to be an independent
advocacy group, but its talking points very much reflect the goals and
objectives of the GOAJ. In recent meetings, Tale and his cohorts have
raised “Armenian aggression” in Nagorno-Karabakh and “double standards”
of U.S. human rights and democracy reporting in the region, and
complained about efforts of the U.S. Congress to provide humanitarian
assistance within the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave. Tale and/or Nijat
also own the Qabala Football Club — perhaps as a small-scale effort
to replicate the Chelsea antics of Russia’s Roman Abramovich. The
Qabala squad is a virtual United Nations team, with BAKU 00000127 004
OF 004 players from across Europe, Latin America and Africa — the
best team money can buy, at least for central Azerbaijan. Both sons
were educated in London and presently live there. Tale holds a B.A. in
International Relations and History from the London School of Economics
and an M.A. in Security and Global Governance from Birkbeck College,
while Nijat holds a B.A. in Politics and East European Studies from
University College London and an M.A.

in Management, Organizations, and Governance from the London School
of Economics. Some newspapers have reported that Tale might return
to Baku to become a Member of Parliament later this year. It’s Good to

Be King

The family’s influence is strongest in the regions of Qabala, Masalli,
and Lenkeran. Postsuspects that Heydarov continues to control the tate
Customs Committee and wield influence over the Ministry of Taxes, the
Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources, and Ministry of Economic
Development, which is now led by a former Ministry of Taxes official.

Additionally, of course, Heydarov profits significantly from widespread
activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations. That ministry,
according to observers, may be the most sought after employer in
official Baku, as Heydarov has made a reputation for paying salaries
on time and in full. Employees benefit from perks of MES employment,
such as the ability to enroll children in one of Baku’s best-looking
and best-financed public schools. Measures like these, contacts report,
create a loyal following for the minister among his minions.

Turf Wars: Don’t Cross Kamaladdin

Embassy contacts note that Kamaladdin Heydarov is currently in a
“fight over grain” with Minister of Agriculture Ismat Abbasov, and
wants Abbasov replaced by Member of Parliament Eldar Ibrahimov.

Historically, those who have fought with Heydarov have always
fared poorly: Farhad Aliyev and Heydar Babayev were (in succession)
driven out as Minister of Economic Development in part after falling
on Heydarov’s bad side. Both were billed as reformers, and the
economic reforms they were seen to propose stood to hurt Heydarov’s
interests at the State Customs Committee and the Ministry of Emergency
Situations. In addition, some opposition newspapers had begun to call
them potential candidates for the position of Prime Minister. Feeling
threatened by their reform activity and growing power, Heydarov
allegedly put his foot down. Both were removed from government and
their business interests were seriously damaged. Rumors circulated
in 2009 that Heydarov may have even been behind the assassination of
Air Force Chief and Deputy Defense Minister General Rail Rzayev. The
rumors point to the widely-reported forced landing of Heydarov’s
helicopter after it took off without obtaining flight clearance.

The next issue of “Who Owns What” will profile the family of Ziya
Mammadov, the Minister of Transportation. With so much of the nation’s
oil wealth being poured into road construction, the Mammadovs also
control a significant source of rent-seeking. His holdings extend to
the buses that run throughout Baku. A recent television report asked if
the Mammadovs controlled mysterious construction company ZQAN Holding;
the reporter pointed out the letters of ZQAN matched the initials of
father Ziya, mother Qanira, son Anar, and daughter Nigar.

A ZQAN representative brushed this aside as innuendo.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian Diplomacy Constantly Suffers A Defeat

ARMENIAN DIPLOMACY CONSTANTLY SUFFERS A DEFEAT
By Aram Araratyan

ArmInfo
2010-12-01 19:40:00

Interview of Vladimir Karapetyan, member of Foreign Relations Committee
of Armenian National Congress, former spokesperson of Armenian Foreign
Ministry, with ArmInfo News Agency

Vladimir, how do you assess the Declaration adopted at the Lisbon
Summit of NATO and Serzh Sargsyan’s decision to boycott this event?

A Declaration was adopted at the Lisbon Summit of NATO, the provisions
of which are unacceptable for Armenia. The 35th article in fact
determines Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement within the frames of
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. Inclusion of such a dangerous
Wording for Nagorno-Karabakh that may break the fragile balance in
the Caucasus region is an omission of the Armenian diplomacy. I’d also
point out that the North Atlantic Alliance has been adopting a document
with similar wordings for many years, but the Armenian Foreign Ministry
or any other responsible state structure has expressed no protest or
disagreement with this. There was no response at all. Moreover, in 2008
Serzh Sargsyan personally participated in NATO summit in Bukharest,
where a similar wording was adopted in the NATO Declaration. This is
the continuation of unilateral concessions of the Armenian diplomacy.

The same provisions were in the outcome declaration in 2008, however,
Serzh Sargsyan attended the NATO Summit. How can his present step be
explained then?

Serzh Sargsyan deceives the people. If he says that refuses to take
part in the summit because of inadmissible wordings in the text of the
declaration, in that case why, having the similar conditions, did he
leave for Bucharest to take part in NATO summit in 2008 and why was
there no reaction in 2009? Why did Armenian Foreign Ministry say no
word on the occasion? It means that he simply draws the wool over the
eyes of the Armenian society. I’d also like to draw your attention to
one more document. The Summit of the Heads of Caspian Littoral States
took place in Baku after Serzh Sargsyan had said in Moscow that he was
returning to Armenia in a more confident mood after the meetings with
his counterparts. The statement adopted upon completion of the summit
contained even stricter formulations than NATO’s declaration. The
presidents of Russia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Iran and Azerbaijan
stated that the regional conflicts should be settled on the basis
of not only respect for sovereignty and observance of territorial
integrity, but also inviolability of borders. To recall, 2 out of the
5 countries – Russia and Kazakhstan – are our allies within the CSTO.

This document demonstrates the real attitude of Serzh Sargsyan’s
counterparts with whom he met in Moscow.

The OSCE is going to hold a summit in Astana. What are the expectations
concerning the Karabakh peace process?

As regards Astana, I cannot imagine what should make Azerbaijan
and actually NATO countries and Caspian littoral states supporting
it abstain from introducing the same provisions in the outcome
declaration of the OSCE Summit. As to the basic principles of the
Karabakh peace process (one of the first versions is known to the
public as the Madrid Document), their provisions are currently
being very intensively discussed. At the moment it is quite hard
to say whether there will be some progress on the Madrid Document
in Kazakhstan, but I am afraid that the outcome declaration of the
Summit in Astana may again contain unacceptable formulations for us.

You say that Armenia constantly suffers a diplomatic defeat. What is
the key reason of this defeat?

It is naturally obvious that the key reason is the domestic reason,
but I’d also like to say some words about the foreign policy. The
steps taken by Serzh Sargsyan over the past few years are leading to
consistent degradation of the Armenian foreign ministry. To prove my
words, I will only point out the fact that a lot of people that are no
diplomats have recently been appointed ambassadors. That is to say,
Serzh Sargsyan appoints judges, former parliamentarians, somebody’s
relatives, friends, come-and-go people to the most important posts in
diplomatic missions. This means the incompetence that is displayed
everywhere also has a destructive effect on the Armenian foreign
ministry, where high-skilled and professional diplomats work. However,
the reason of all these foreign political problems are the domestic
problems, particularly, the availability of political prisoners and
the fact that Serzh Sargsyan cannot speak with his people. Look, the
heads of all our neighboring countries regularly address messages to
their people, participate in events, press conferences, and regularly
present the official stance to the people. When did Serzh Sargsyan do
anything of the kind? He cannot speak with the people, he is unable
to ground his own key decisions.

You have touched on some domestic political problems, particularly,
the problem of political prisoners. Let’s continue this topic. The
PACE co-rapporteurs are expected to pay a visit to Yerevan in January.

Do you expect the authorities to take any steps in this direction
before the co-rapporteurs’ arrival?

We have already said that we expect some progress in this direction.

It is a pity that Serzh Sargsyan neglects the appeals of the opposition
and the public and makes some concessions in the matter of political
prisoners only under the pressure of external forces. Just imagine what
effect it would have on his rating if this man decided to release the
political prisoners upon the appeal of his own citizens and his own
public. But since he was not elected president lawfully, he cannot
take this step and can make concessions under external pressure only.

Are you content with the work of PACE co-rapporteurs on Armenia?

Not so much. The fact that they have paid no visit to Yerevan over a
year, while they should have done in accordance with their mandate,
speaks volumes. Although PACE adopted a resolution, according to which
people under cover may come out of hiding, the Armenian authorities,
whose representatives in PACE voted for the given resolution, detained
Nikol Pashinyan, thereby deceiving the PACE co-rapporteurs and the
international community. PACE has made absolutely no response to
this, and it is the indifference and inconsistency displayed by the
co-rapporteurs till October-November 2010 that contributed to this
behavior of the authorities.

The opposition has started to more frequently criticize Head
of Armenian Delegation to PACE David Haroutyunyan. ANC Leader
Ter-Petrosyan also touched on David Haroutyunyan’s activity in his
latest speech. What is it connected with and why is David Haroutyunyan
criticized now?

David Harutyunyan is a man that contributed most of all to preserving
of our political prisoners in prison by his “corrections” and “active
work” in the Council of Europe. I think the history will see the true
value of David Haroutyunyan’s “merits” in this matter. And we shall
try to do everything possible for the truth about Haroutyunyan’s
anti-state actions to be available to everybody.

The Armenian National Congress has repeatedly stressed the necessity of
holding snap elections in the country. Are there any premises for this?

The failures and misfortunes in the domestic and foreign policies
of Armenia are conditioned by the fact that the Armenian authorities
are able to ensure progress in neither economy, nor democratization,
nor media freedom, nor any other issues. Being opposition, the ANC
is openly publishing all the existing problems, trying to mobilize
people and to make its voice heard in the wide circles. As for the
authorities, they cannot resolve these and some other vitally important
problems today and may be unable to ensure Armenia’s security in the
future. These are very serious problems, and I suppose the sooner we
can hold free and fair elections, the better it will be for Armenia.

Vladimir, the history of public and political life of independent
Armenia shows that the man or the political party that has once
lost elections (let’s put aside the matter of their fairness and
transparency) loses his/its electorate and suffers a defeat at the
following elections as well. It occurred in 1996 and 1998, and it
also occurred in 2003 and 2007. May Armenian National Congress have
the same fate?

The electorate of Armenian National Congress has undoubtedly grown
since 2008. The unprecedented mobilization of the society and the
unprecedented rallies held over 3 years are evidence of it. Can
you name any other country where there is such a situation when the
opposition can gather such numerous rallies and hold permanent protest
actions in three years after the elections? The trust of the people
is the most important thing in this matter. He said if the people
saw that the opposition is not fair and is bargaining, naturally,
they would not trust in such opposition. But the people trust in us
and our fair image. Our regional structures are actively working. I
am sure this work will become more active on the threshold of the
election. I would like to say that all this work has been implemented
by us in the conditions of absolute blockade by the television. I have
become the “television persona non grata” over the past 7-8 months.

Nevertheless, do you see anything positive in this country?

We observe regress in all spheres. Therefore I am sure that we will
be unable to gain progress until Armenia undergoes political changes.

Unfortunately, Serzh Sargsyan lacks the necessary political will to
implement serious reforms in the country.

Do you consider possible pre-electoral cooperation with other
oppositional forces, particularly ARFD and Heritage?

Dashnaktiutyun is not an opposition force. ARFD has 2 official
representatives in the National Assembly (Armen Rustamyan and Hrayr
Karapetyan), which occupy the leading positions in the parliament of
the country. ARFD is still supported by the authorities and their
criticism is not adequate taking into consideration the present
situation in the country. As for the Heritage party, nothing may be
ruled out. We hope that the opposition will go to the election with
a single front.

Thanks for the interview.

From: A. Papazian

Shavarsh Kocharyan: Three Main Factors Were Emphasized In Astana

SHAVARSH KOCHARYAN: THREE MAIN FACTORS WERE EMPHASIZED IN ASTANA

Armradio.am
03.12.2010 18:36

“Azerbaijan’s isolation in its destructive policy was once again
demonstrated in Astana,” Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Shavarsh
Kocharyan said, commenting on the outcome of the OSCE summit in Astana.

According to the Deputy Foreign Minister, three important factors
were clearly emphasized in both the joint statement and the separate
speeches of high-ranking officials of different countries.

“First, it’s not allowed to give preference to any of the main
principles of international law, ignoring the others. Second, the
use of force is categorically rejected in the settlement of conflicts.

Third, it is necessary to reinforce the ceasefire regime and pull
back the snipers from the line of contact,” he stated.

“This was another attempt by the international community to bring
Azerbaijan to the constructive field,” Shavarsh Kocharyan said, adding
that if Baku really wants to solve the issue instead of maintaining
the status, it should put an end to its destructive policy.

From: A. Papazian

Implementers Of Uranium Project In Armenia Start Drilling Operations

IMPLEMENTERS OF URANIUM PROJECT IN ARMENIA START DRILLING OPERATIONS

ArmInfo
2010-12-03 17:43:00

ArmInfo. Despite the mass public protests, uranium project implementers
in Armenia after all proceeded to drillings for uranium prospecting
and they started drilling a well of 140 m just above Lernadzor Village,
EcoLur says.

According to Ruben Yadoyan, an outstanding specialist in geological
prospecting and PhD in Geological-Mineralogical Sciences,
if prospecting is a success and geologists will detect uranium
accumulation, in case of in-depth investigation circulation water may
intake new and new portions of radiation. Geo prospecting is over,
and what should be done with this radioactive water? One should
take into consideration that in case of uranium, if only geological
prospecting is conducted, security must be at the highest level
possible. But whether these security measures are applied in the
Armenian experience, this is the question,” said Yadoyan.

To recall, the Armenian Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources
states that all the prospecting operations are safe, as the samples
will be taken at the depth of no more than 15 cm. At the same time,
the State Committee on Radiation Security states that radiation
background in Lernadzor is within standards. Local employees check
radiation background with dosimeters that show 40 mille roentgen. They
were persuaded this is not terrible for Armenia and we are able to
survive in case of such radiation. People try to protect themselves,
but they are imposed heavy measures. Lernadzor villagers keep on
talking about migration more and more frequently.

Unfortunately, responsible persons keep silence about the risks of
migration from Syunik. The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources,
as owner of 50% of shares of Armenian-Russian Ore Mining Organization
CJSC, has assumed the commitments on ensuring safety of the uranium
project.

From: A. Papazian

Kommersant: Negotiations On The Final Declaration Of The OSCE Summit

KOMMERSANT: NEGOTIATIONS ON THE FINAL DECLARATION OF THE OSCE SUMMIT WITH ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN, GEORGIA AND UZBEKISTAN WERE THEHARDEST

ArmInfo
2010-12-03 17:30:00

ArmInfo. Negotiations on the final declaration of the OSCE Summit
with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Uzbekistan were the hardest,
Kommersant writes. In particular, Baku demanded confirmation of the
territorial integrity principle in the final declaration, whereas
Armenia was insisting on the principle of the people’s right to
self-determination.

The participants in the OSCE Summit in Astana that was qualified
to become the key milestone in the history of the OSCE could hardly
prevent its failure. Representatives of 56 states signed the final
declaration and agreed to adopt an action plan for future after long
hot disputes. The atmosphere in the session halls and behind the
scenes was far from being optimistic. On Wednesday Russian President
Dmitry Medvedev expressed the general sentiments by declaring that
the Organization is losing potential. For his part, President of
Belarus A. Lukashenko shared the Russian president’s stance in Sochi
on Thursday and came out for serious modernization of the OSCE. The
OSCE members hope the final declaration will help reanimating the
Organization.

A high-ranking official at the Russian Foreign Ministry told Kommersant
that the final document was to comprise a declaration dedicated to the
35th anniversary of the OSCE and confirming the Helsinki principles and
an action plan. Every party strived to push through its demands. In
fact, they agreed to start consultations. The final press conference
was postponed for several times.

The Uzbek delegation was against inclusion of Kazakh President’s
initiatives on united security space and development of relations with
OSCE and other organizations into the final document. For his part,
Georgian president was pushing through a formula on South Ossetia
and Abkhazia while Russia was against that. After hot disputes the
participants found compromises late in the evening and signed the
political declaration confirming the key principles of the OSCE thanks
to patientce and efficiency of the Kazakh organizers.

From: A. Papazian

Azerbaijani Newspaper: Not Only Internal But Also Foreign Policy In

AZERBAIJANI NEWSPAPER: NOT ONLY INTERNAL BUT ALSO FOREIGN POLICY IN AZERBAIJAN IS IN DEPLORABLE STATE

ArmInfo
2010-12-03 17:34:00

ArmInfo. Not only the internal but also the foreign policy in
Azerbaijan is in a deplorable state, “Novoye Vremya” Azerbaijani
newspaper says in the article “Is vodka a truth detector?”.

“The ruling circles of Azerbaijan among the so-called political
experts and in the mass media tried to confirm an opinion as if after
long searches of the conceptual basis, the country’s foreign policy
has finally gained a stable and purposeful nature and rests on the
fundamental principles which reflect the long-term national goals
and interests. Such estimation of Azerbaijan’s foreign policy most
likely mistakes the wish for the reality. Publications on WikiLeaks
site once again confirmed the truth: not only the internal but also
the foreign policy in the country is in a deplorable state”, the
article author says.

“However, despite all this and irrespective of the goals the US is
guided by, it is obvious that the Azerbaijani diplomacy is vulnerable
and weak, and state figures are not ready for diplomatic talks. Series
of failures in the international arena are often presented as a result
of inconsistency of foreign political ambitions with the country’s
recourses. A conclusion is sometimes drawn that after recovery of its
territorial integrity, Azerbaijan will be able to fulfill the goals
it is capable for. There is another explanation: the country’s foreign
policy is formed by a narrow circle of people. Baku’s activity in the
international arena reflects their ideological preferences, the vision
of the world and Azerbaijan’s place there, notion of the means towards
the ends which not always meet the reality. There is one explanation
more: foreign policy of Azerbaijan is formed during interaction, and
sometimes confrontation of different elites and groups of interests,
each of which presents the interest of its group as national”, the
newspaper resumed.

From: A. Papazian

Kiro Manoyan: OSCE Summit In Astana Did Not Lead To Any Progress In

KIRO MANOYAN: OSCE SUMMIT IN ASTANA DID NOT LEAD TO ANY PROGRESS IN KARABAKH PROCESS

ArmInfo
2010-12-03 17:36:00

ArmInfo. The OSCE Summit in Astana did not lead to any progress in
the Karabakh process. However, it did not lead the process to final
deadlock either. It is already a positive fact that a document was
signed which implies that the parties will continue negotiations,
Kiro Manoyan, Director of the ARFD Bureau’s Central Office for Hay
Dat and Political Affairs, told media on Friday.

“We had serious concerns that in Astana Turkey will make another
attempt to use the Armenian- Turkish protocols as a mechanism of
pressure and insist on adoption of a document on Karabakh unfavorable
for Armenia allegedly to speed up ratification of the protocols.
Something like this was mentioned in the cables classified by
Wikileaks. Fortunately, we avoided such scenario. Azerbaijan, in its
turn, seriously relied on signing of a road map on Karabakh, but no
progress is possible in the negotiations as long as Azerbaijan rules
out independence of Karabakh,” he said.

Manoyan also said that despite their interests in resolution of the
Karabakh conflicy, the OSCE co-chair-countries are actually not ready
to exert pressure just on one of the parties to the conflict as Turkey
and Azerbaijan demand. When they resort to pressure they press both
the parties to prevent a new war. In addition, the statement adopted
in Astana once again confirmed the Madrid Principles which does
not reckon with the Karabakh people’s will. “The Madrid Principles
return the process to the situation of 1988 for they neglect the two
referendums held in Karabakh in 1991 and 2006. The only positive fact
is that the parties commit to further negotiate, which reduces the
risks of war. Reference to the UN Charter is also an important fact,
but not a big achievement,” he said.

The OSCE Summit in Astana on December 1 – 2 was the first summit
over the last 11 years. Leaders of 28 OSCE member-states attended the
Summit and discussed the Karabakh process alongside with other issues.
On the occasion of the OSCE Summit in Astana, a Joint Statement by
the Heads of Delegation of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair Countries
and the Presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia was adopted. The three
OSCE Co-Chair countries pledged their support for the Presidents of
Azerbaijan and Armenia as they make the necessary decisions to reach a
peaceful settlement. They urged the leaders ofArmenia and Azerbaijan
to focus with renewed energy on the issues that still remain in the
Basic Principles, and instructed their Co-Chairs to continue to work
with the parties to the conflict to assist in these efforts.

From: A. Papazian