The Kurdish State Will Emerge – if USA is Willing

THE KURDISH STATE WILL EMERGE – IF USA IS WILLING

Azg/arm
4 Feb 05

The Iraqi parliamentary elections were launched to set a national
assembly of 275 lawmakers that would choose a president and two
vice-presidents of the country from among its members and the latter
would chose a prime minister.The primary task of the would-be national
assembly is to prepare a draft constitution that will be voted on
October 15.

In case the constitution passes new parliamentary elections will be
held in Iraq on December 15 that will form the executive and the
legislature on the constitutional basis.

In other words the elections are important as regards the Iraqi
constitution and the constitution is vital for Iraq’s political
future. If the Iraqi constitution turns Iraqi state into federation
that will put the country onthe edge of falling apart.

A referendum held along with the elections on January 30 in 4 Kurdish
cities of Northern Iraq showed that 99.5 percent of population demands
independence. Masut Barzani, president of Democratic Party of
Kurdistan, made an interesting statement regarding Kurdish
population’s orientation. Turkish Yeni Shafaq newspaper informed on
January 31 that Barzani met journalists in Salahaddinwhere he stated
that there is no such question if a Kurdish state will be created but
when will it be created. `Kirkuk’s identity is Kurdish.Neither Turkey
nor any other state has the right to draw conclusions about Kirkuk or
any other Iraqi state’.

Barzani’s words caused Turkey’s active confrontation. Chairman of
Turkish parliament, Byulent Arnc, called Barzani arrogant noting that
the American has petted him. Apparently Arnc’s words missed the point
as Barzani made his second statement on February 3: `Independence is
inevitable; demand for independence is the most natural right of
Kurdish people’. A Kurdish politician and foreign minister of Iraqi
temporary government, Khoshyar Zebar, added to Barzani’s words:
`Hopefully the Iraqi Kurdistan will become Europe’s neighbor in near
future’.

Regardless of Barzani’s and Zebar’s views, America’s position and
plans for Iraq’s reconstruction will be decisive. Turkish foreign
minister Abdullah Gul who is paying an official visit to China
declared in Beijing on February 2:` The US has to take tough measures
to neutralize insurgency in Northern Iraq’. Meanwhile he reminded
that Turkey stands for Iraq’s territorial integrity.

Condoleezza Rice, US Secretary of State, who is going to visit Ankara
on February 5, will possibly discuss the issue of Kurdish state as
well as issues concerning Iraq’s reconstruction with Abdullah Gul.

By Hakob Chakrian

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

UN Official Solicited Oil Deal from Iraq -Report

UN Official Solicited Oil Deal from Iraq -Report
Thu Feb 3, 4:44 PM ET World – Reuters

By Evelyn Leopold and Irwin Arieff

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – A senior U.N. official solicited and
received allocations of oil from Iraq (news – web sites) for a trading
company while he was directing the U.N. oil-for-food program, a key
investigative report said on Thursday.

The official, Benon Sevan of Cyprus, engaged in conduct that was
“ethically improper and seriously undermined the integrity of the
United Nations (news – web sites),” said the report by Paul Volcker,
the former U.S. Federal Reserve (news – web sites) chairman.

Volcker was appointed by the United Nations to lead a probe of the
now-defunct $67 billion program and on Thursday gave an interim
report. The final analysis is expected in June.

The report did not say that Sevan received bribes but mentioned that
he got $160,000 in cash from 1999 to 2003 from his aunt in Cyprus, who
has now died. The report said the aunt’s lifestyle did not suggest
wealth.

But Volcker said Sevan solicited and received allocations of oil on
behalf of the African Middle East Petroleum Company, a small trading
firm, registered in Panama with offices in Switzerland, Monaco and
elsewhere. It was run by Egyptian Fahkry, a cousin of former
U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, who left office at the
end of 1996.

It was “highly unlikely” that such a company would have been allowed
to buy oil unless someone lobbied Baghdad. In return for the
allocations, Sevan was expected to make a case for Iraq receiving cash
to upgrade its deteriorating oil facilities, which he and several
Security Council members did.

“Mr. Sevan repeatedly solicited allocations of oil under the program,”
the report said. Iraqi officials in return expected Sevan’s support on
such issues as funds for repairing Iraq’s crumbling oil facilities, it
said.

The oil-for-food program, which began in December 1996 and ended in
November 2003, allowed Saddam Hussein (news – web sites)’s government
to sell oil in order to buy humanitarian goods. It was intended to
ease the life of ordinary Iraqis under 1990 U.N. sanctions.

But in his report of more than 200 pages, Volcker told a news
conference that “we have not found a systematic misuse of funds
dedicated to the administration of the oil-for-food program.” He said
the investigation was continuing.

Since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, documents have emerged that show
Saddam Hussein skimming funds from the program, selling oil illegally
outside the program, often with the knowledge of big powers on the
Security Council, and bribing a variety of officials around the world.

Volcker also said that U.N. officials ignored procurement procedures
and safeguards from the very start of the program.

Investigators found “convincing and uncontested evidence” that the
selection process was tainted by irregularities for each of the first
three contractors selected — the French bank Banque Nationale de
Paris, the Dutch firm Saybolt Eastern Hemisphere BV and the British
Lloyd’s Register Inspection Ltd, the report said.

A CIA (news – web sites) investigation last September found Saddam
earned $1.7 billion through kickbacks and illegal surcharges on the
program from 1996 to 2003. He got an additional $8 billion in illegal
oil sales to Jordan, Turkey and Syria, which were known to the
Security Council, including the United States, in its supervision of
the program.

Volcker said it was a matter of record that the United States, among
others, have given Jordan and Turkey a waiver to receive Iraq oil
outside of the U.N. program because they suffered hardships from the
sanctions.

Volcker said allegations of conflict of interest by Annan would be
handled in a later report. Annan’s son Kojo, had once worked in West
Africa for a firm under contract to the United Nations in Iraq. Annan,
who only became secretary-general in 1997, has said he had no hand in
assigning contracts.

The report also said that another senior official, Joseph Stephanides,
who was involved in the program in 1996 and before Sevan took over the
operation, intervened in procuring major contracts for large firms.

“The evidence amply demonstrates that a tainted procurement process
took place in 1996, when the program was just getting under way,”
Volcker said, adding that political considerations came into play.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Annan Vows Action Against UN Staff in Iraq Program

Annan Vows Action Against UN Staff in Iraq Program

By Evelyn Leopold

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – A probe into the U.N. oil-for-food program
for Iraq (news – web sites) said the director of the operation got oil
allocations for a firm run by a friend, and U.N. Secretary-General
Kofi Annan (news – web sites) vowed to discipline him.

Benon Sevan, who ran the humanitarian program, was accused in a report
from Paul Volcker, the former head of the U.S. Federal Reserve (news –
web sites), of soliciting and getting the allocations for a trading
firm connected to the family of former Secretary-General Boutros
Boutros-Ghali.

A second official, Joseph Stephanides, now director of Security
Council affairs, was alleged to have intervened in selecting large
contractors for the program he helped organize in 1996, before Sevan
took over in late 1997.

Annan said he too would be disciplined and that if criminal acts were
committed, diplomatic immunity would be lifted.

The oil-for-food program, which began in December 1996 and ended in
November 2003, allowed Saddam Hussein (news – web sites)’s government
to sell oil in order to buy humanitarian goods. It was intended to
ease the life of ordinary Iraqis under 1990 U.N. sanctions.

The fraud allegations have cast a shadow over the world body and Annan
himself, who chose Volcker to lead an independent investigation.

“I think it is a fact that Mr. Sevan placed himself in a grave and
continuing conflict of interest situation that violated explicit
U.N. rules and violated the standards of integrity essential to a
high-level international civil servant,” Volcker told a news
conference.

Sevan, a Cypriot, issued his own statement.

“Mr Sevan never took a penny,” his lawyer Eric Lewis
said. “Unfortunately, in the current political climate, the
Independent Inquiry Committee needs to find someone to blame.”

But Annan, who took over the top U.N. post from Boutros-Ghali in
January 1997, said in a statement the report contained “extremely
troubling evidence of wrongdoing” by Sevan, who has retired from the
United Nations (news – web sites) but gets a token salary because of
the inquiry.

‘THE SECRETARY-GENERAL IS SHOCKED’

“The secretary-general is shocked by what the report has to say about
Mr. Sevan,” Annan’s chief of staff, Mark Malloch Brown, told a news
conference. “He very much doubts there can be any extenuating
circumstances to explain the behavior, which appears proven in the
report.”

But he noted, “we got a thumbs up” on administration of the program
and Iraq should be encouraged that the funds were used as intended.

Volcker said few institutions had subjected themselves to such
“intensity of scrutiny.”

The report also cited “convincing and uncontested evidence” that three
firms: Banque Nationale de Paris; the Dutch Saybolt Eastern Hemisphere
and Britain’s Lloyd’s Register Inspection were awarded contracts
without competitive bidding in 1996.

But Volcker said in the interim report — the final one will be in
June — the most serious violations of the U.N. sanctions involved
illegal oil sales outside oil-for-food.

“And there is no question that those sales were known by the
U.N. Security Council,” which included the United States.

A CIA (news – web sites) investigation in September found Saddam
earned $1.7 billion via kickbacks on goods and oil under the
program. He got an additional $8 billion in oil sales to Jordan,
Turkey and Syria, which were known to the council.

Volcker said he was concentrating on wrongdoing by U.N. officials.
Specifically, the report said Sevan had convinced Iraq to sell oil
allocations to African Middle East Petroleum company, an obscure
trading firm registered in Panama with offices in Switzerland and
Monaco.

The company is headed by Egyptian Fahkry Abdelnour, a cousin of
Boutros-Ghali. The deal was also helped along by Fred Nadler, the
former secretary-general’s brother-in-law, the report said.

He also questioned Sevan’s assertion that an aunt in Cyprus, now
deceased, had given him some $160,000 over several years. The trading
firm, according to Iraqi records, netted a profit of $1.7 million, the
report said.

Volcker said allegations of conflict of interest by Annan would be
handled in a later report. Annan’s son Kojo once worked in West Africa
for a Swiss firm Cotecna, under contract to the United Nations in
Iraq.

Annan has said he had no hand in assigning contracts and his son says
he had left the company when the deal was made.

Report Criticizes Oil-For-Food Program

Report Criticizes Oil-For-Food Program

Associated Press
February 3, 2005

By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS – Former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker says
his investigation of corruption in the oil-for-food program in Iraq
found that program director Benon Sevan engaged in “an irreconcilable
conflict of interest” by choosing the companies that bought Saddam
Hussein’s oil.

Volcker’s first report, as outlined to The Associated Press by an
official close to the investigation and by Volcker himself in an op-ed
article in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal, found the $60 billion program
“tainted” from top to bottom.

Volcker said in the article that program managers, auditors, contractors
hired to oversee the program’s operation and those who controlled U.N.
expenditures for it, all failed “to follow the established rules of the
organization designed to assure fairness and accountability.”

The 219-page report was scheduled to be released by Volcker Thursday
afternoon. He personally delivered a copy to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi
Annan on Thursday morning and spent about 45 minutes with the U.N. chief.

“We had some discussion of it,” Volcker said.

U.N. spokesman Fred Eckhard said Annan was “perhaps surprised” by
Volcker’s decision to preview his findings before giving the
secretary-general the report.

“We are currently studying the report,” Eckhard said.

Mark Malloch Brown, the secretary-general’s new chief of staff, would
hold a press conference after the report’s release to give Annan’s
reaction, he said.

The oil-for-food program, launched in December 1996 to help ordinary
Iraqis cope with U.N. sanctions imposed after Saddam’s 1990 invasion of
Kuwait, quickly became a lifeline for 90 percent of the population.

Under the program, Saddam’s regime could sell oil, provided the proceeds
went primarily to buy humanitarian goods and pay reparations to victims
of the 1991 Gulf War. Saddam’s government decided on the goods it
wanted, who should provide them, and who could buy Iraqi oil. But the
Security Council committee overseeing sanctions monitored the contracts.

The program ended in November 2003, after the U.S.-led war that toppled
Saddam. Allegations of corruption first surfaced in late 2000, with
accusations that the Iraqi leader was putting surcharges on oil sales
and pocketing the money.

In January 2004, the Iraqi newspaper Al-Mada published a list of about
270 former government officials, activists, journalists and U.N.
officials from more than 46 countries suspected of profiting from Iraqi
oil sales that were part of the U.N. program. Annan appointed Volcker in
April to lead an independent investigation.

Volcker made clear that the committee’s intention is to improve the
United Nations, not to destroy it, and he applauded Annan for opening
the world organization’s books, saying “few institutions have freely
subjected themselves to the intensity of scrutiny entailed in the
committee’s work.”

The interim report will not address questions about Annan or the
employment of his son, Kojo, by the Swiss company, Cotecna Inspection
SA, which had a U.N. contract to certify deals under the oil-for-food
program.

Critics have raised questions about nepotism and whether Kojo Annan
played any role in securing contracts for Cotecna – allegations he
denies. Volcker said the investigation of the secretary-general and his
son “is well advanced” and the person close to the inquiry told AP that
it will be addressed in a separate report later this winter.

Though Sevan has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, Volcker said “the
evidence is conclusive that Mr. Sevan, in effectively participating in
the selection of purchasers of oil under the program, placed himself in
an irreconcilable conflict of interest.” This violated both U.N. rules
and Sevan’s responsibility as an international civil servant, he said.

Volcker did not accuse Sevan of corruption. Annan has said he will lift
the diplomatic immunity of any U.N. official if Volcker finds evidence
of alleged involvement in criminal activity. Sevan has retired, but
remains on the U.N. payroll for $1 a year to help with the investigation.

The Financial Times reported Tuesday that Sevan personally intervened to
steer lucrative Iraqi oil contracts to Africa Middle East Petroleum, a
Swiss-based oil trading company. The contracts could be sold to
international traders for a markup of up to 35 cents a barrel, the paper
said.

Volcker said the procurement process was “tainted,” auditing of the
program was “underfunded and undermanned,” and its management was
“lacking.” Perhaps not surprisingly, he said, “political considerations
intruded” into procurement.

Last month, Volcker released more than 50 audits of the oil-for-food
program carried out by the U.N.’s internal watchdog office, headed by
Dileep Nair, who is also expected to be criticized in the report, the
official familiar with the investigation said, speaking on condition of
anonymity.

The audits detail how U.N. agencies working under the oil-for-food
program allegedly squandered millions of dollars through suspect
overpayment to contractors, mismanagement of purchasing and assets, and
fraud by its employees.

In a briefing paper that accompanied the release of the audits,
Volcker’s Independent Inquiry Committee questioned why the auditors
neglected the New York headquarters of the Office of the Iraq Program,
which Sevan headed. It said auditors also neglected the oil and
humanitarian supplies contracts, and transactions through the program’s
account at the French bank BNP Paribas.

Investigators say Saddam’s government used its control over contracting
to corrupt the program.

Expectations that the preliminary report will produce real evidence are
high, especially since Volcker has come under intense criticism for
comments downplaying his potential findings. He has said he intends to
provide a final report around midyear.

Annan told reporters Wednesday the United Nations is already taking
measures to strengthen some management practices and will implement
Volcker’s recommendations, saying there will probably be some “harsh
judgments.”

He added that he has already asked the General Assembly to review the
mandate of the U.N. watchdog office, which was created 10 years ago, “to
see how we can strengthen it and give it appropriate authority to do its
work.”

;cid=540&u=/ap/20050203/ap_on_re_mi_ea/oil_for_food_investigation_9&printer=1

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp

Abkhaz President-Elect Comments on Zhvania’s Death

Abkhaz President-Elect Comments on Zhvania’s Death

Civil Georgia (Tbilisi)
2005-02-03

President-elect of breakaway Abkhazia Sergei Bagapsh expressed
condolence regarding the death of the Georgian Prime Minister Zurab
Zhvania and said `Zhvania’s death will not influence’ relations
between Tbilisi and Sokhumi.

`Conflict settlement process will continue in the manner as it has
been developing. Death of the Georgian Prime Minister will not and can
not have impact on our [Tbilisi-Sokhumi] relations,’ Russian news
agency RIA Novosti reported quoting Bagapsh as saying.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=8959

`Grant Her Your Spirit’

`Grant Her Your Spirit’

America (americamagazine.org)
Vol. 192, No. 4
February 7, 2005

By Phyllis Zagano

The Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Greece voted in Athens on Oct.
8, 2004, to restore the female diaconate. All the members of the Holy
Synod – 125 metropolitans and bishops and Archbishop Christodoulos, the
head of the church of Greece – had considered the topic. The decision does
not directly affect the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, which is
an eparchy of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. The Greek
ecclesiastical provinces of the Ecumenical Patriarchate received their
independence from Constantinople in 1850 and were proclaimed the
Autocephalous Church of Greece.

While women deacons had virtually disappeared by the ninth century, the
facts of their existence were well known, and discussion of the
restoration of the female diaconate in Orthodoxy began in the latter
half of the 20th century. Two books on the topic by Evangelos Theodorou,
Heroines of Love: Deaconesses Through the Ages (1949) and The
`Ordination’ or `Appointment’ of Deaconesses (1954), documented the
sacramental ordination of women in the early church. His work was
complemented in the Catholic Church by an article published by Cipriano
Vagaggini, a Camaldolese monk, in Orientalia Christiana Periodica in
1974. The most significant scholarship on the topic agrees that women
were sacramentally ordained to the diaconate, inside the iconostasis at
the altar, by bishops in the early church. Women deacons received the
diaconal stole and Communion at their ordinations, which shared the same
Pentecostal quality as the ordination of a bishop, priest or male deacon.

Despite the decline of the order of deaconesses in the early Middle
Ages, Orthodoxy never prohibited it. In 1907 a Russian Orthodox Church
commission reported the presence of deaconesses in every Georgian
parish; the popular 20th-century Orthodox saint Nektarios (1846-1920)
ordained two women deacons in 1911; and up to the 1950’s a few Greek
Orthodox nuns became monastic deaconesses. In 1986 Christodoulos, then
metropolitan of Demetrias and now archbishop of Athens and all of
Greece, ordained a woman deacon according to the `ritual of St.
Nektarios’ – the ancient Byzantine text St. Nektarios used.

Multiple inter-Orthodox conferences called for the restoration of the
order, including the Interorthodox Symposium at Rhodes, Greece, in 1988,
which plainly stated, `The apostolic order of deaconess should be
revived.’ The symposium noted that `the revival of this ancient order
should be envisaged on the basis of the ancient prototypes testified to
in many sources and with the prayers found in the Apostolic
Constitutions and the ancient Byzantine liturgical books.’

At the Holy Synod meeting in Athens in 2004, Metropolitan Chrysostom of
Chalkidos initiated discussion on the subject of the role of women in
the Church of Greece and the rejuvenation of the order of female
deacons. In the ensuing discussion, some older bishops apparently
disagreed with the complete restoration of the order. Anthimos, bishop
of Thessaloniki, later remarked to the Kathimerini English Daily, `As
far as I know, the induction of women into the police and the army was a
failure, and we want to return to this old matter?’

While the social-service aspect of the female diaconate is well known,
the Holy Synod decided that women could be promoted to the diaconate
only in remote monasteries and at the discretion of individual bishops.
The limiting decision to restore only the monastic female diaconate did
not please some synod members. The Athens News Agency reported that
Chrysostomos, bishop of Peristeri, said, `The role of female deacons
must be in society and not in the monasteries.’ Other members of the
Holy Synod agreed and stressed that the role of deaconesses should be
social – for example, the conferring of last rites on the sick.

The vote of the Holy Synod to restore the female diaconate under limited
circumstances may be the most progressive idea the Orthodox Church can
bring to the world. The document does not use the word ordination, but
specifically allows bishops to consecrate (kathosiosi) senior nuns in
monasteries of their eparchies. But bishops who choose to promote women
to the diaconate have only the ancient Byzantine liturgy that performs
the same cheirotonia, laying on of hands, for deaconesses as in each
major order: bishop, priest and deacon. Even so, some (mostly Western)
scholars have argued that the historical ordination of women deacons was
not a cheirotonia, or ordination to major orders, but a cheirothesia, a
blessing that signifies installation to a minor order. The confusion is
understandable, since the two terms were sometimes used interchangeably,
but other scholars are equally convinced that women were ordained to the
major order of the diaconate. The proof will be in the liturgy the
bishops actually use. At present there is only one liturgy and one
tradition by which to create a woman deacon in the Byzantine rite, and
it is demonstrably a ritual of ordination for the `servant who is to be
ordained to the office of a deaconess.’

Even the document on the diaconate issued by the Vatican’s International
Theological Commission in 2002 admits that `Canon 15 of the Council of
Chalcedon (451) seems to confirm the fact that deaconesses really were
`ordained’ by the imposition of hands (cheirotonia).’ Despite the
pejorative use of quotation marks here and elsewhere in the document
when historical ordinations of women deacons are mentioned, this Vatican
commission seems unwilling to deny the history to which the Church of
Greece has now newly returned. Further, the Vatican document points out
that the practice of ordaining women deacons according to the Byzantine
liturgy lasted at least into the eighth century. It does not review
Orthodox practice after 1054.

The rejuvenation of the order of deaconess in the Church of Greece is
expected to begin during the winter of 2004-5. The contemporary
ordination (cheirotonia) of women provides even more evidence and
support for the restoration of the female diaconate in the Catholic
Church, which has acknowledged the validity of Orthodox sacraments and
orders. Despite the distinction in Canon 1024 – `A baptized male alone
receives sacred ordination validly’ – one can presume the possibility of a
derogation from the law, as suggested by the Canon Law Society of
America in 1995, to allow for diaconal ordination of women. (The history
of Canon 1024 is clearly one of attempts to restrict women from
priesthood, not from the diaconate.)

In fact, the Catholic Church has already indirectly acknowledged valid
ordinations of women by the Armenian Apostolic Church, one of the
churches of the East that ordains women deacons. There are two recent
declarations of unity – agreements of mutual recognition of the validity
of sacraments and of orders – between Rome and the Armenian Church, one
signed by Paul VI and Catholicos Vasken I in 1970, another between John
Paul II and Catholicos Karekin I in 1996.

These agreements are significant, for the Armenian Apostolic Church has
retained the female diaconate into modern times. The Armenian
Catholicossate of Cilicia has at least four ordained women. One, Sister
Hrip’sime, who lives in Istanbul, is listed in the official church
calendar published by the Armenian Patriarchate of Turkey as follows:
`Mother Hrip’sime Proto-deacon Sasunian, born in Soghukoluk, Antioch, in
1928; became a nun in 1953; Proto-deacon in 1984; Mother Superior in
1998. Member of the Kalfayian Order.’ Mother Hrip’sime has worked to
restore the female diaconate as an active social ministry, and for many
years was the general director of Bird’s Nest, a combined orphanage,
school and social service center near Beiruit, Lebanon. Her diaconate,
and that of the three other women deacons, is far from monastic.

The future Catholic response to the documented past and the changing
present promises to be interesting. The tone of the International
Theological Commission document reveals an attempt to rule out women
deacons, but the question is left remarkably open: `It pertains to the
ministry of discernment which the Lord established in his church to
pronounce authoritatively on this question.’

It is becoming increasingly clear that despite the Catholic Church’s
unwillingness to say yes to the restoration of the female diaconate as
an ordained ministry of the Catholic Church, it cannot say no.

Prayer for the Ordination of a Woman Deacon

O Eternal God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Creator of man
and of woman, who replenished with the Spirit Miriam, and Deborah, and
Anna, and Huldah; who did not disdain that your only-begotten Son should
be born of a woman; who also in the tabernacle of the testimony, and in
the temple, did ordain women to be keepers of your holy gates – look down
now upon this your servant who is to be ordained to the office of a
deaconess, and grant her your Holy Spirit, that she may worthily
discharge the work which is committed to her to your glory, and the
praise of your Christ, with whom glory and adoration be to you and the
Holy Spirit for ever. Amen.’

– Apostolic Constitutions, No. 8 (late fourth century)

Phyllis Zagano is adjunct associate professor of philosophy and
religious studies at Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., and author of
Holy Saturday: An Argument for the Restoration of the Female Diaconate
in the Catholic Church (Crossroad, 2000).

For information about America, go to

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.americamagazine.org

Sultan of blood

DAILY MAIL (London)
February 3, 2005

SULTAN OF BLOOD

by ANDREW ROBERTS

ENEMIES were beheaded in their hundreds of thousands, whether they
surrendered or not. In the killing fields, their heads were piled
into grotesque knolls 15ft high and 30ft wide. One historian recorded
that ‘vultures, scenting carrion, wheeled overhead, swooping down to
pluck eyes out of sockets as 20,000 expressions of abject terror,
horror, disgust and defiance stared out into a blank sky’.

This was the work of the Emperor Tamerlane, whose kingdom was founded
on blood-lust and sadism, the like of which the world had never seen.
The mere mention of his name — a derivation of Temur the Lame, after
he was wounded in his youth — instilled fear in any who stood in his
way.

Tamerlane — who was also known as Amir of the Tartars, Sword of
Islam and Lord of the Fortunate Conjunction of the Planets — died
600 years ago this month. And despite the passing of the centuries
and the litany of gruesome and worthy contenders, he is still
considered by many historians to be the most cruel and bloodthirsty
— and most successful — military conqueror ever.

When he came across a city to conquer, he put the entire population
to the sword — children as well. The women died only after they had
been raped and mutilated.

Occasionally, because he was an intellectual who spoke many languages
and enjoyed chess, he would spare historians or chess masters. But
anyone else who stood in his path was doomed.

When one town attempted rebellion during his reign of terror, its
2,000 inhabitants were taken prisoner and a tower constructed out of
their living bodies.

As one historian recalls: ‘They were piled one upon the other with
mortar and bricks, so that these miserable wretches might serve as a
monument to deter others from revolting.’

There was method in Temur’s homicidal madness; he knew that if his
‘Golden Horde’ of Tartars were so feared that people would submit to
any humiliation rather than fight them, his empire would extend
through that reputation.

And the method worked. Because of his quite astonishing viciousness,
this Tartar chieftain, who was born in 1336 but whose early life
remains a mystery, created a massive empire.

It stretched thousands of miles in every direction and reached into
the modernday Balkans, Egypt, Turkey, Russia, Iraq, Iran,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and even stretched to the borders of
China.

Wherever he went, he left desolation. When he marched his 100,000-
strong army into a province of Afghanistan, then known as the ‘Garden
of the East’, Tamerlane razed its capital Zaranj so completely that
even now, nearly six centuries later, it remains deserted.

THOUGH the city had surrendered, recorded historian Arabshah: ‘Temur
drew the sword upon them and billeted upon them all the armies of
death. He laid the city waste, leaving in it not a tree or a wall,
and destroyed it utterly.’

Everyone perished, ‘from persons of 100 years old, to infants in the
cradle’.

At the holy Persian city of Isfahan in 1387, he ordered every woman
prisoner’s breasts to be cut off and demanded that his 70,000
soldiers cut off one man’s head each and hand it in to his adjutants.

Some baulked at this bloody demand and paid the more enthusiastic
killers 20 dinars per head to commit the deed on their behalf. But
such was the scale of the beheading, the price per head soon fell to
half a dinar.

An eyewitness described what happened next: ‘He ordered the children
under seven years of age to be placed apart from their families, and
ordered his warriors to ride over them.

‘When his counsellors and the children’s mothers saw this, they fell
at his feet and begged that they would not kill them. He got angry
and rode himself and then they were obliged to ride over the
children, and they were all trampled upon. There were 7,000.’

The historian Hafiz-i-Abru later walked around Isfahan and counted 28
towers each built out of 1,500 severed heads.

The sacking of Baghdad in 1401 was more terrible yet. Temur built a
bridge of boats over the River Tigris and stationed his archers on it
to prevent any of the inhabitants escaping by boat.

Upriver, he besieged the city in the hottest summer known in decades.
After six weeks he attacked; the lucky inhabitants were the ones who
drowned in the Tigris trying to escape.

Arabshah records how Temur once again demanded each soldier bring him
a head, and how: ‘They brought them singly and in crowds and made the
river Tigris flow with the torrent of their blood, throwing their
corpses on to the plains, and collected their heads and built towers
of them.’

As was often Temur’s wont, scholars and historians, religious men and
chess grand-masters were not only spared, but were given ‘robes of
honour, fresh horses and safe conduct’ away from the human abattoir.
Meanwhile, 120 towers of heads were built around the ashes of the
city.

Temur’s recent and best biographer, Justin Marozzi, calculates that
in the putrid air of Baghdad’s rotting corpses, ‘this time the
vultures had 90,000 bodies to feed on’.

Although Temur described himself as ‘Ghazi, Warrior of the Faith’,
fellow Muslims could never expect better treatment than that which he
meted out to Hindus, Christians and Jews.

He was indiscriminate. In 1398 near Delhi, he ordered the massacre of
100,000 Hindus, and two years later he ordered 4,000 Armenians living
in Sivas to be buried alive.

The historian Marjorie Housepian Dobkin, writing about his conquest
of Smyrna in Turkey in 1402, recorded that ‘Tamerlane butchered the
inhabitants in an orgy of cruelty that would become legendary.

‘While the inhabitants slept, his men stealthily undermined the
city’s walls and propped them up with timber smeared with pitch. Then
he applied the torch, the walls sank into ditches prepared to receive
them, and the city lay open. Smyrna’s would-be defenders, the Knights
of Saint John, escaped to their ships by fighting through a mob of
panicstricken inhabitants. They escaped just in time, for Tamerlane
ordered 1,000 prisoners beheaded and used their skulls to raise a
monument in his honour.

‘He rode on to Ephesus, where the city’s children were sent out to
greet and appease him with song. “What is this noise?” he roared, and
ordered his horsemen to trample the children to death.’

Yet such was his military success that today the highest decoration
in Uzbekistan is the Order of Temur.

At Aleppo in Syria, surrender was attempted, but it failed to turn
away Tamerlane’s wrath, since one of his ambassadors had been
murdered there.

AS A result, related historian Ibn Taghri Birdi, ‘the women and
children fled to the great mosque of Aleppo, but Tamerlane’s men
followed them, bound the women with ropes and put the children to the
sword, killing every one of them.

‘They committed the shameful deeds of which they were accustomed;
virgins were violated without concealment; gentlewomen were outraged
without any restraints of modesty; a Tartar would seize a woman and
ravage her in sight of the people of the city; her father and brother
and husband would see her plight and be unable to defend her because
they were distracted by the tortures they themselves were suffering.’

Temur had a dozen or so known wives, several of whom he married for
dynastic reasons, but on campaign he ‘was wont to deflower virgins’
by the score.

In each devastated city, Temur took the pick of the ruler’s harem and
looted all his treasures, which were taken back to the great cities
he was building at Samarkand and Bokhara in Uzbekistan.

Once, on returning to Samarkand, he decided the portal of the great
mosque there was insufficiently lofty, so he had all the architects
involved executed.

The result was a building so magnificent that, in Lord Curzon’s words
in 1888: ‘There is nothing in Europe which can even aspire to enter
the competition.’

At the age of 69, Temur died peacefully on his way to China, where he
had hoped to humiliate the Emperor just as he had the Sultan of
Turkey — whom he had kept in an iron cage and had used as a human
footstool, and whose wife he had forced to serve him food naked.

How must the people of Central Asia and beyond have sighed with
relief when they heard that the man they called ‘The Scourge of God’
was no more.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Test Your Super Mettle

Test Your Super Mettle

ESPN.com
February 3, 2005

By Bill Simmons

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — After my laptop batteries ran out on the airplane
to Jacksonville last Monday, I was playing one of those dopey “Dumb
things to do to keep your brain occupied” games and realized that it
could make a fun entry for Super Blog II. Here’s the test: Off the top
of your head, can you name the teams, the score and the MVP from every
Super Bowl? Feel free to play along; we’ll run the answers below.

Here’s the first part of my noble attempt, along with my first
recollection of each game (and I swear on Willie McGinest’s life that I
didn’t cheat):

SUPER BOWL VII

Miami 14, Washington 7 (MVP: Jake Scott)

Forget the undefeated season for the Dolphins — this was the game that
clinched Hall of Fame status on the Unintentional Comedy Scale for Garo
Yepremian, the most famous Armenian in Super Bowl history.

Correct answer: Miami 14, Washington 7 (MVP: Jake Scott)

Editor’s Note: Bill Simmons is filing round-the-clock reports from
Jacksonville, Fla., in Super Blog II. Check back throughout the day for
updates. Here are all his entries from Day 4:

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/superblog/4

Another Hotline for Victims of Jehova’s Witnesses Activities

PanArmenian News
Feb 3 2005

ANOTHER HOTLINE TO BE INTRODUCED FOR VICTIMS OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES
ACTIVITIES

03.02.2005 15:15

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Another telephone number – 56 35 49 – will add next
week to the already existing hotline 56 42 97, opened October 21,
2004, via which citizens can report about facts of breaking their
rights by Jehovah’s Witnesses religious organization. Leader of the
youth wing of the Republican Party of Armenia Armen Ashotian reported
it. It should be reminded that this autumn being concerned over the
facts of breaking human rights resulting from the activities of
Jehovah’s Witnesses and some other religious movements, over 40 youth
organizations of diverse political and public orientation initiated
creation of the mentioned hotline. Violation of child rights, cases
of suicide, desecration of Armenian Christian symbols (icons,
khachkars, etc.) are specifically mentioned. At the same time, in
Ashotian’s words, the hotline has not been efficient yet, as people
are not informed well about it.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Dubai: Armenian politician in theft case released

Gulf News, United Arab Emirates
February 3, 2005

ARMENIAN POLITICIAN IN THEFT CASE

by Bassam Za’za’, Staff Reporter

An Armenian politician who was held on suspicion of theft has been
released, diplomatic sources said yesterday.

Hagop Hagopyan, his son and a third suspect were held for questioning
late last month.

The incident occurred after a shop manager complained to police that
two leather jackets worth Dh60,000 had gone missing after the trio
had visited the store.

Hagopyan was on a visit to Dubai, said Arshag Poladyan, Armenian
Ambassador to the UAE.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress