Verelq: Hijacked democracy. Armenia’s falsified parliamentary voter

The parliamentary elections of Armenia were held on June 7, under the conditions of large-scale, systematic and documented frauds.


The purpose of these elections was not simply to determine the representatives of the people or the future orientation of the country. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan was fully aware that it depends on their outcome whether he will continue to lead the country alone for another five years, or whether he will be criminally liable for violating the Constitution and hundreds of laws.


Realizing that this is a fight for his own survival, Pashinyan used all the legal and illegal means at his disposal to get re-elected and avoid imprisonment.


The election frauds started long before the voting day. As part of a series of draconian measures implemented in the months leading up to the elections, Pashinyan ordered the arrest of hundreds of opposition supporters, accusing them of handing out election bribes. However, none of those arrested have yet been tried or found guilty. Furthermore, without any legal basis, he ordered the arrest of several opposition parliamentary candidates with the aim of disrupting their election campaigns and intimidating their supporters. Pashinyan also violated the legislative requirement, according to which he is a member of the parliament in order to arrest the candidate, it was necessary to obtain the consent of the Central Electoral Commission in advance. In addition, he prohibited opposition leaders Gagik Tsarukyan, Robert Kocharyan and Narek Karapetyan from leaving the country on short trips, again without the required approval of the Central Election Commission.


Pashinyan ordered the arrest of the well-known businessman and philanthropist Samvel Karapetyan on the very day that he expressed his support for the Armenian Apostolic Church. After spending months in the pre-trial detention center in harsh conditions, Karapetyan was transferred to house arrest. With this step, Pashinyan effectively deprived a major political opponent of the opportunity to campaign for his party before the elections.


In the weeks leading up to the election, Pashinyan traveled around the country illegally using vast state resources for his political campaign. He was accompanied by government ministers and heads of parliament, who abused their official positions without going on leave.


Contrary to election law, the government forced hundreds of schoolchildren and teachers to attend Pashinyan’s campaign rallies during school hours in order to create the illusion of mass public support. State employees were also subject to such mandatory attendance.


On voter rolls, the Central Election Commission had announced 2.5 million registered voters in a country with a maximum population of three million. These lists included large numbers of children under the age of 18 and hundreds of thousands of Armenians who had emigrated years ago but whose names remained on the voter lists. This discrepancy created ample opportunity for voter fraud, as the government could vote for absentee citizens. Indeed, a number of voters, upon arriving at the polling stations, found out that someone had already voted for them.


Additional electoral fraud occurred when authorities brought large numbers of soldiers to polling stations and instructed them to vote for the prime minister’s party. These soldiers conducted multiple voting by moving between several polling stations, a tactic known as “carousel voting”.


The authorities also created obstacles for those citizens of Armenia who came from abroad specifically to participate in the voting. Upon arrival, many of them were immediately sent to 25-day military training, thus disenfranchising them.


Astonishingly, after only a small fraction of the voting results had been counted on June 7, Pashinyan was quick to announce that his party had won a majority, thus putting pressure on the Central Election Commission to declare him the winner.


After the preliminary counting on June 8, serious inconsistencies appeared between the votes recorded in the polling stations and the total numbers published by the Central Electoral Commission. Hundreds, if not thousands, of votes cast in favor of the opposition parties were undercounted. All three major opposition parties rejected the results, calling them falsified, and demanded new elections and appealed to the Constitutional Court. However, new elections would most likely produce the same result due to the same fraudulent methods used. Moreover, all the members of the Constitutional Court were appointed by Pashinyan’s parliamentary colleagues, which makes it almost impossible to cancel the results.


On June 14, exactly one week after the elections, the Central Electoral Commission announced the final results. Despite the documents submitted by the “Prosperous Armenia” party, which showed many uncounted votes, the Commission claimed that the party lacked several votes to overcome the 4% threshold. As a result, it was announced that Pashinyan’s “Civil Contract” party received 49.75% of the votes, securing 64 parliamentary mandates, “Powerful Armenia” party – 23.27% – 29 mandates, and “Armenia Alliance” – 9.9% – 12 mandates. Pashinyan’s party secured about 60% of the seats in parliament, despite receiving only 49% of the public vote, as the remaining 15 parties did not pass the 4% threshold and their votes were redistributed, mostly in favor of Pashinyan’s party.


However, Pashinyan’s party failed to secure the necessary two-thirds majority to adopt the new Constitution demanded by President Ilham Aliyev. Therefore, Azerbaijan will refuse to sign the Peace Treaty widely praised by Pashinyan. This result puts Pashinyan in a very awkward position, as he campaigned on the promise of peace while accusing the opposition of being “war parties”.


Over the past week, there have been large-scale discussions in Armenia about whether the opposition parties should take their mandates in the rigged parliament or give them up and boycott them. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages. They will announce their decision soon.


Regardless of whether the opposition parties decide to take the seats or not, they must take the following two important steps:


1. Unite all opposition forces and jointly call hundreds of thousands of Armenians to flood the streets of Yerevan and other cities to participate in continuous protests until Pashinyan’s resignation.


2. Form a “shadow cabinet” by appointing opposition politicians to unofficial ministerial positions. This structure will lead the process of removing Pashinyan from office and will prepare the smooth transfer of power after his removal.


Harut Sassounyan


www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com


Translation: Ruzanna Avagyan

Disclaimer: This article was contributed and translated into English by Emil Lazarian. While we strive for quality, the views and accuracy of the content remain the responsibility of the contributor. Please verify all facts independently before reposting or citing.

Direct link to this article: https://www.armenianclub.com/2026/06/17/verelq-hijacked-democracy-armenias-falsified-parliamentary-voter/

Emil Lazarian

“I should like to see any power of the world destroy this race, this small tribe of unimportant people, whose wars have all been fought and lost, whose structures have crumbled, literature is unread, music is unheard, and prayers are no more answered. Go ahead, destroy Armenia . See if you can do it. Send them into the desert without bread or water. Burn their homes and churches. Then see if they will not laugh, sing and pray again. For when two of them meet anywhere in the world, see if they will not create a New Armenia.” - WS

Leave a Reply