TURKISH press: Turkey, Azerbaijan ink deal to secure Nakhchivan’s natural gas supply

Workers inspect the Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP) MS4 reading station near the border with Greece in the Ipsala district of Edirne province, northwestern Turkey, Dec. 2, 2019. (AA Photo)

The Turkey-Nakhchivan natural gas pipeline will ensure the security of Nakhchivan’s energy supply via natural gas, which will flow through Turkey to the Azerbaijani exclave, Turkish Energy Minister Fatih Dönmez said Tuesday.

The minister was speaking at the signing ceremony of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) inked for the construction of the line. The ceremony was attended by his Azerbaijani counterpart Parviz Shahbazov.

It will be constructed as a continuous line to the Iğdır Natural Gas Pipeline located in the easternmost Turkish province of Iğdır and will transfer the natural gas obtained via Azerbaijan, with a high degree of probability as Dönmez put it, to the Nakhchivan.

The project will be carried out in cooperation with Turkey's Petroleum Pipeline Company (BOTAŞ) and Azerbaijan’s state energy company SOCAR.

Stating that Nakhchivan has a population of nearly 500,000 and natural gas consumption of 500 million cubic meters, Dönmez said: “One of the wounds caused by the Karabakh invasion will be healed with the gas that will be delivered to the region via Iğdır.”

"Thus, a safe natural gas supply will be provided to Nakhchivan as it has been before the Armenian occupation of Karabakh," the minister said.

In total, about 20% of Azerbaijan's territory – including Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent regions – has been under illegal Armenian occupation for nearly three decades.

He added that the project will pave the way for more investments and initiatives in the region.

If the Iğdır- Nakhchivan pipeline is built, the Nakhchivan's gas needs can be met through part of the Azerbaijani gas sent to Turkey, Deputy Chief of SOCAR's Public Relations and Events Department Ibrahim Ahmadov earlier told APA-Economics while commenting on the signing of the MoU.

Nakhchivan currently depends mainly on the natural gas carried through its border with Iran based on swap operations with the country.

Under the swap agreement between Baku and Tehran inked in 2004, Azerbaijan supplies gas to Iran's isolated northwestern border city of Astara and 85% of that volume flows to Nakhchivan. Renegotiating the terms of the agreement was also on the table for Baku.

“In order to ensure energy security of Nakhchivan the issue to construct such pipeline was on the agenda a long time,” Ahmadov was also cited as saying.

Broader energy cooperation

The Turkey- Nakhchivan natural gas pipeline is one of the latest examples of broader energy cooperation between Ankara and Baku.

The minister said during its signing ceremony that a total of 8.1 billion cubic meters (bcm) of natural gas has flowed through the Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP) since its inauguration in June 2018 thanks to successful cooperation between the two countries. He also said that to date, 70 million cubic meters of natural gas flowed to the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) for filling purposes.

The 878-kilometer (546-mile) TAP began commercial operations last month to carry 10 bcm of Azerbaijani gas annually to Europe.

The pipeline represents the European leg of the Southern Gas Corridor and connects with the TANAP at the Turkish-Greek border in Kipoi then crosses Greece, Albania and the Adriatic Sea before coming ashore in southern Italy.

TURKISH press: Iran’s inaction and reaction

Since the early years of the revolution, Iran has generally followed an inactive policy regarding the West, but one of reaction toward the Muslim world.

It is understandable that Iran, which lacks the capacity to respond to anti-Iranian policies implemented by the West, cannot answer in kind. However, Iran generally remains silent against most anti-Iranian activities of Western countries as is obvious from its inaction following the assassination of two influential Iranian officials.

Two top Iranian officials, Gen. Qassem Soleimani and nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, were assassinated in 2020. The assassination of Soleimani, the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ Quds Forces, was directly carried out by the United States at the beginning of the year.

Iran’s principal scientist behind its nuclear project, Fakhrizadeh, was allegedly killed while he was under the protection of the Revolutionary Guards.

Most observers claim that Israel is behind his assassination. Besides the harsh words spoken against these two countries, Iran took no action against the U.S. or Israel. In fact, so far Iran has not reacted effectively to any punitive actions by the West.

On the other hand, the very same Iran reacts strongly to almost any anti-Iranian statement or policy by the officials of other Muslim states such as Turkey.

Iran created a huge fuss after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan recited a poem last week. Iranian officials such as Foreign Minister Javeed Zarif overreacted to the poem, claiming that it directly threatened the territorial integrity of Iran.

Many Iranian politicians and media outlets went further and intimidated Erdoğan for reciting the poem.

There are certain reasons why Iranian officials have overreacted to the poem. First of all, Iranian officials have been trying to undermine Turkey's role in the liberalization of Azerbaijani lands from the Armenian occupation.

Turkey has emerged one more time as a game-changer in the region. Strategic weapons provided by Turkey changed the balance of power in the second Karabakh war in favor of Azerbaijan.

Iran is finding it hard to fathom Turkey's increasing popularity, due to its effective role in the liberalization of Muslim land within the Azerbaijani state boundaries. Iran is disturbed since it seems that it has lost against Turkey in the South Caucasus.

Second, the collapse of its pro-Armenian policy has upset Tehran greatly. Iran, which considers Muslim Azerbaijan as a potential threat to its national security, has been providing direct and indirect support to Armenia since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Armenia, which has lost its strength and effectiveness in the region, cannot contribute much to the Iranian regional policies anymore. It seems that Iran’s political investments in Armenia proved futile.

Third, Iran does not want a solidified strategic alliance between Turkey and Azerbaijan, the two rising powers in the region. An economically and politically stronger Azerbaijan and a militarily stronger Turkey has just passed a huge test fortifying their strategic alliance.

Turkish authorities have repeatedly declared that they have given Azerbaijan a blank check in its fight for the liberalization of its territories. Turkey has contributed greatly to the fulfillment of the Azerbaijani people’s longtime dream.

Fourth, although the Iranian religious and political authority has been in power for the last 40 years, it has been acting as a minority regime in the country.

Therefore, the Iranian regime is very sensitive to any political development in the Muslim world. They always think that they are encircled by a sea of Sunni Muslims. This thinking, which is self-defeating, leads Iranian officials to think in zero-sum terms.

Fifth, Iran has been trying to recover its diminishing image and declining popularity after the assassination of Fakhrizadeh. Since they could not retaliate against the Israeli state, the regime has been trying to revitalize nationalist feelings by exaggerating Erdoğan's recitation of the poem and attacking Turkey. However, it seems that Iranian people will not buy this.

There are a number of reasons worth mentioning but space limitations do not allow me to list them. However, Iranian officials must be reminded that Tehran and Ankara are two interdependent countries in the region.

A zero-sum relationship will be detrimental to the national interests of both sides. Turkey has been much more mature in its relations with Iran. In spite of its competition with Iran, Turkey has been opposing the U.S.-imposed sanctions on Iran and has been asking other regional countries to keep Iran in the regional game.

This is one of the reasons why Israel and some Gulf states have been hurling accusations against Turkey. One last point worth mentioning is that on the same day that Erdoğan recited the poem, he also called for a regional collaboration platform consisting of six regional states, i.e. Turkey, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Russia, Iran and Armenia.

TURKISH press: ANALYSIS – Expanding regional partnerships following Second Karabakh War

Dr. Esmira Jafarova   |15.12.2020

ISTANBUL

On Dec. 10, 2020, Baku witnessed its first ever military parade since the country regained independence in 1991. Azerbaijan celebrated its military victory over Armenia in the 44-day Second Karabakh War – the “Patriotic War” – which lasted from Sept. 27 to Nov. 10. The parade was attended by the President of the Republic of Turkey, His Excellency Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his staff, while Turkish soldiers (mehmetciks) marched alongside Azerbaijani military personnel in Azadliq Square in a marvelous display of solidarity with their brothers.

Apart from being a magnificently proud moment in the history of independent Azerbaijan, this Victory Parade also symbolized the beginning of a new era in the South Caucasus region. The visit of President Erdogan to stand by Azerbaijan on this uniquely historic day also conveyed a number of significant messages in this regard.

Above all, this has been another manifestation of the existing strong cultural and historical kinship ties and strategic partnership between the two nations. The slogan “One nation-two states” –the driving force behind Turkey-Azerbaijan relations—gained a whole new significance during the Second Karabakh War. Turkey, from the very outset, extended its strongest and unequivocal political support to Azerbaijan’s counteroffensive to reclaim its internationally recognized territories, which, in addition to demonstrating an affinity for the rules-based international order, also gave Azerbaijan’s operations further confidence in pursuing its just cause. “Azerbaijan’s joy is Turkey’s joy; Azerbaijan’s pain is Turkey’s pain,” the president of Turkey said during his speech at the parade, invoking the famous adage of Mustafa Kamal Ataturk.

The visit was also notable, with the signing by Azerbaijan and Turkey of several documents involving a deepening of cooperation between the two on several platforms. The two countries agreed on mutual visa-free travel, using only national identifications cards. They also signed documents on the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises, investments, transport, as well as strategic collaboration in the media sector. The signing of new documents further built on the already intense bilateral cooperation between Turkey and Azerbaijan in many areas, with many similar agreements having previously been signed in Feb. 2020 during President Erdogan’s visit to Baku to participate in the 8th meeting of the Azerbaijan-Turkey High-Level Strategic Cooperation Council.

At the joint press-conference after the parade and the signing of the documents, President Ilham Aliyev announced that both countries also discussed the post-conflict future of the region and agreed that a multilateral cooperation platform involving every nation in the region could be launched. In this connection, he specifically stressed that the existing Turkey-Azerbaijan-Georgia, Azerbaijan-Russia-Iran, Turkey-Russia-Iran, and other similar regional cooperation formats could be galvanized under one common umbrella with the participation of all six countries of the region — Turkey, Azerbaijan, Russia, Iran, Georgia, and also Armenia. In order to do so, Armenia must however opt to end its territorial claims to its neighbors, learn its lessons, and engage in building constructive relationships in the region. President Ilham Aliyev explicitly stated that Azerbaijan had not started this animosity with Armenia and was ready to close this chapter of hostility, acrimony and war, and to finally initiate a constructive engagement with its neighbor. The proposed new format of all-inclusive cooperation in the South Caucasus region and its immediate neighborhood may also eliminate the risk of future conflicts.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan extended his support to the plan for a six-party cooperation mechanism that would contribute to achieving sustainable peace in the region. He also emphasized that Turkey has never had any issues with the Armenian nation and that more than one hundred thousand Armenians actually live in Turkey. Problems are created by the representatives of Armenia that pursue expansionist policies. He noted that if Armenia finally comes to embrace a more positive approach towards Turkey, Turkey may open its borders with Armenia, as Turkey does not wish to leave its borders with the neighboring country indefinitely closed. President Erdogan also said that Armenia should free itself from its venomous ideology and the strong influence of external circles on it. The Armenian nation should draw its conclusions from the recent events and this will definitely help to improve the situation in the region.

The Patriotic War waged by Azerbaijan against Armenia’s policy of occupation has exposed Armenia’s faulty strategic thinking. Armenia has self-inflicted isolation from all regional infrastructure, transport, communication, etc. initiatives by nurturing expansionist, militaristic and nationalistic policies that have for years served to create prosperity and mutually beneficial cooperation in the South Caucasus region. These initiatives have bypassed Armenia, however.

Azerbaijan and Turkey have kept their borders with Armenia closed for decades in rejection of Armenia’s occupation of nearly twenty percent of Azerbaijani territories. While Armenia lays territorial claims to also Turkey and has long been at loggerheads with it over the so-called “Armenian genocide” issue, the only condition Azerbaijan and Turkey ever had for including Armenia in those initiatives was the de-occupation of Azerbaijani territories. Armenia refused to do so for years.

Nevertheless, the 44-day Patriotic War, which culminated in Azerbaijan’s victory and the return of its occupied territories, has introduced the new contours of regional geopolitics. Azerbaijan has declared that it will not bear a grudge against Armenia for thirty years of occupation and is ready to move on and look beyond. Turkey also supports this approach. The ball is now in the Armenian court. Its future actions may make or break this unique opportunity to attempt to build an all-inclusive and comprehensive cooperation platform in the South Caucasus. This region has never had one before.

[ The writer is Board Member of the Center for International Relations Analysis, located in Baku ]

* Opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Anadolu Agency.

CivilNet: The Karabakh War, Media, Propaganda, and Immorality

CIVILNET.AM

06:18

By Karen Harutyunyan, Editor-in-Chief of CIVILNET

On November 9, Artsakh President's spokesman Vahram Poghosyan wrote on his Facebook page that Shushi is no longer under Armenian control. CIVILNET published this news after checking personally with Poghosyan to make sure the news is accurate and that his page had not been hacked — something that was not uncommon with official social media accounts during the war. 

Allegations of treason and a barrage of insults against CIVILNET immediately followed.

Shortly afterwards, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan posted on his Facebook page that the fighting in Shushi continues. 

We knew that Armenians had not been in control of Shushi for several days; our media teams had been reporting near the area for the entire duration of the war. What Poghosyan announced was not a surprise. 

What was surprising, however, was the prime minister's statement that the fighting was continuing. He wrote this a few hours before announcing the infamous ceasefire agreement, and while Russian peacekeepers were on their way to Artsakh — of course, not without his consent. 

The public's reluctance to perceive the reality on the ground was not accidental. Throughout the war, the media was instructed by the state to report information only from official sources.

For 44 days, the Armenian media worked under martial law restrictions and under self-censorship, with the principle of "do not cause harm".

"We destroyed," "The enemy was thrown back," "intense battles," "heavy battles," "strategic retreats" and many similar words and phrases became part of daily conversations on Facebook and other platforms, accompanied by #WeWillWin. 

This further dulled the public's already foggy sense of reality. 

On November 2, while in Syunik’s Davit Bek village in Armenia's southeast, CIVILNET journalist Tatul Hakobyan reported that the war was approaching the borders of Syunik.

For a sensible person, there was no sensational revelation in this news. For several days now, Armenia's Ministry of Defense had been publishing maps, which clearly showed that most of the southern Zangelan and Qubatlu districts had already fallen under Azerbaijani control. In other words, it was Armenia's Ministry of Defense that had been “stating”  that the war was approaching the borders of Syunik. We also knew that Azerbaijani shelling had killed a civilian in that same Davit Bek village.

Nonetheless, social media’s "professional patriots" continued to attack CIVILNET and accuse our reporters of being traitors for publishing this information. This was not as surprising and painful as the comments we received from officials who would ask, "What are you doing? Why are you writing such things?"

These are just episodes of how the obvious truth was being hidden from the public under the restrictions of martial law. 

In reality, from the very beginning of the war, official state information and the information we received from CVILNET journalists in Artsakh and from our military contacts were in direct contradiction to each other.

This contrast was more apparent in the diaries we published from our Artsakh correspondent Lika Zakaryan, who wrote from a bomb shelter in Stepanakert.

Despite the constrictions of martial law, despite the fear of being fined, and despite the pathos-laden outbursts of our readers, we nevertheless cautiously presented the reality, in an attempt to propel the public and, surprising though it may seem, the political leadership, to assess the situation wisely, and put an end to the war as soon as possible. As we later learned, such opportunities had presented themselves several times during the war.

Wouldn't we have saved more lives (and territory) if the state cautiously provided the public with accurate information? Wouldn't we have saved more lives if the media had been able to cover the reality on the ground more freely?

It is understandable that during a war, journalists who are citizens of the warring countries work carefully to at the very least not endanger their countrymen and their state with the information they publish.

But the course of the 44-day war showed that journalists' unrestricted work would have saved the country from much greater damage and tragedy. This is especially true in the case where the country’s top leadership has been shown to be irresponsible and incompetent.

In the end, people suffered the greatest trauma because of the immoral propaganda of their own officials.

[This piece was originally published in Armenian at media.am.]

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 12/15/2020

                                        Tuesday, 

Anti-Government Protests Continue In Armenia

        • Sargis Harutyunyan
        • Astghik Bedevian

Armenia -- Opposition supporters demonstrate in Yerevan to demand Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian's resignation, .

A coalition of more than a dozen Armenian opposition parties vowed to force 
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian to resign soon as thousands of its supporters 
continued to demonstrate in Yerevan on Tuesday.

It sought to step up the pressure on Pashinian in the face of his continuing 
refusal to hand over power to an interim government following the war in 
Nagorno-Karabakh.

“We have been growing in number for the last several days and our ranks are 
joined by more and more decent people,” Artur Vanetsian, the leader of one of 
the parties making up the Homeland Salvation Movement, told the crowd marching 
through the city center.

“Together we will very quickly drive Nikol, who is clinging to power, out of the 
government building and he will be held accountable before the Armenian nation,” 
said the former director of the country’s National Security Service.

Ishkhan Saghatelian of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun), 
another key member of the opposition grouping, said the protests will continue 
on a daily basis and end in success soon.

“These demonstrations are multiplying our power and more people are joining us 
every day,” he claimed. “As a result of these actions, we will set the stage for 
Nikol’s departure in the coming days. The New Year without Nikol!”


Armenia -- Opposition supporters demonstrate in Yerevan to demand Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian's resignation, .

The opposition forces hold Pashinian responsible for the Armenian side’s defeat 
in the war with Azerbaijan and say he is not capable of confronting new security 
challenges facing the country. Their demands for his resignation, the formation 
of an interim government and conduct of fresh parliamentary elections within a 
year have been backed by President Armen Sarkissian, the Armenian Apostolic 
Church and prominent public figures in Armenia and its worldwide Diasapora.

Pashinian has rejected these demands. In a televised address to the nation aired 
on Monday, he insisted that he still has a mandate to govern the country and 
will quit only in case of a democratic “expression of the people’s will.”

Pashinian met on Tuesday with parliament deputies representing his My Step bloc. 
Participants of the two-hour meeting said it focused on the current situation in 
the Karabakh conflict zone and the ruling political team’s plans to amend the 
Armenian Electoral Code.

One of the pro-government lawmakers, Nazeli Baghdasarian, told reporters that 
the authorities “do not rule out pre-term elections.” But she would not be drawn 
on when they might be held.

Baghdasarian also claimed that the opposition does not want the polls to be held 
soon because it would stand no chance of winning them.



Freed Captives Examined By Doctors

        • Marine Khachatrian

Armenia - Captives freed by Azerbaijan walk off a Russian plane at Yerevan's 
Erebuni airport, 

Doctors in Yerevan were examining on Tuesday the first group of Armenian 
soldiers and civilians freed by Azerbaijan in a prisoner swap facilitated by 
Russia.

The 30 prisoners of war (POWs) and 14 civilian captives, most of them residents 
of Nagorno-Karabakh, were flown to Yerevan by a Russian plane late on Monday. 
For its part, the Armenian side released 12 Azerbaijani prisoners.

All of the freed Armenians were hospitalized immediately after their 
repatriation. According to the Armenian Ministry of Health, the civilians were 
taken to civilian hospitals in Yerevan to undergo thorough checkups and, if 
necessary, receive medical treatment.

Officials confirmed that some of the 44 soldiers and civilians were captured by 
the Azerbaijani side before the recent Karabakh war stopped by a 
Russian-brokered ceasefire. One of those servicemen, Arayik Ghazarian, was taken 
prisoner after straying into Azerbaijani territory in August 2019.

Ghazarian’s mother was among relatives of the freed POWs who waited outside a 
military hospital where the latter were examined by doctors.

“They were giving me hope, saying that if there is a prisoner swap Arayik will 
definitely come back because Azerbaijan did not bring criminal charges against 
him,” she told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service.

The November 10 truce agreement commits the conflicting sides to exchanging all 
POWs and other captives held by them. Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinian spoke 
on Monday of “intensive” efforts to secure the release of other Armenians 
remaining in Azerbaijani captivity.

Their precise number remains unclear. Armenian official say only that Azerbaijan 
has admitted holding fewer Armenian POWs than were captured by it during the 
six-week war.

“Some of the prisoners have been returned home but a large number of others 
remain in Azerbaijan,” said Artak Zeynalian, a human rights lawyer representing 
the families of dozens of POWs.



Armenian Central Bank Raises Key Interest Rate


Armenia -- The governing board of the Central Bank meets in Dilijan, January 1, 
2017.

The Central Bank of Armenia (CBA) raised its main interest rate by 1 percentage 
point on Tuesday following a major depreciation of the national currency, the 
dram.
The CBA’s governing board increased the refinancing rate to 5.25 percent from 
4.25 percent despite anticipating a sharper contraction of the Armenian economy 
than was projected earlier this year.

The bank cut the benchmark rate for four times between March and September this 
year as the economy plunged into recession due to the coronavirus pandemic. 
During the most recent rate cut it forecast a GDP decline of 6.2 percent.

Armenia’s economic outlook worsened further following the ensuing outbreak of 
the war in Nagorno-Karabakh stopped by a Russian-brokered ceasefire on November 
10. The domestic economy is now projected to shrink by more than 7 percent in 
2020.

The Armenian dram has weakened against the U.S. dollar by almost 6 percent over 
the past month. Its exchange rate had been largely stable since 2013.

The CBA board did not mention the dram’s depreciation in a statement explaining 
the interest rate rise. The statement cited instead what it described as 
increased inflationary pressures on the Armenian economy emanating from the 
outside world.

Senior Central Bank officials downplayed the exchange rate fluctuations earlier 
this month. They said the bank’s key concern is to continue to curb inflation.

The weaker dram has already pushed up the prices of some key imported foodstuffs 
such as flour, sugar and cooking oil.

The International Monetary Fund praised the CBA’s monetary policy when it 
approved a $37 million loan tranche to Armenia late last week. At the same time 
it urged the bank to be ready to “adjust” that policy while maintaining 
“exchange rate flexibility.”



Another Provincial Governor To Resign

        • Karine Simonian

Armenia -- Lori Governor Andrey Ghukasian.

The governor of Armenia’s northern Lori province said on Tuesday that he will 
step down because of a decision to replace him made by the country’s political 
leadership.

“After the political decision made within the [ruling] team I was offered to 
tender my resignation,” Andrei Ghukasian told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “I 
accepted the decision and am going to resign tomorrow.”

“After the resignation I will stay in the team and fully support the 
government,” he said, adding that he has already received new job offers but 
wants to “take a little break for having a rest.”

Ghukasian linked the decision to replace him with ongoing “changes” taking place 
in Armenia but did not elaborate. He said he is likely to be replaced by another 
member of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s political team.

Last week, a pro-government lawmaker representing a Lori constituency resigned 
from the National Assembly, saying that he will soon take up a position in the 
executive branch. The lawmaker, Aram Khachatrian, on Tuesday did not deny or 
confirm his impending appointment as Lori’s new governor.

Ghukasian has run the region bordering Georgia for the last two years. He is the 
third provincial governor replaced since a Russian-brokered ceasefire that 
stopped the war in Nagorno-Karabakh on November 10.

The Armenian side’s defeat in the war sparked opposition protests and growing 
calls for Pashinian’s resignation. The prime minister has refused to quit so 
far, pledging instead to reshuffle his cabinet. He has replaced six government 
ministers over the past month.



Armenia, Azerbaijan Begin Prisoner Swap


NAGORNO-KARABAKH -- Armored vehicles of Russian peacekeepers move along the road 
towards Agdam from their check point outside Askeran, November 20, 2020


Armenia and Azerbaijan exchanged on Monday the first groups of prisoners under a 
Russian-brokered deal that stopped the war in Nagorno-Karabakh last month.
Armenian officials said a Russian plane carrying 44 Armenian prisoners landed at 
Yerevan’s Erebuni airport late in the evening. It was not immediately clear if 
the group included only soldiers or also Karabakh Armenian civilians that were 
held in Azerbaijani captivity.

“Additional information about the returned prisoners will be provided later on,” 
Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinian said in a Facebook post that announced the 
start of the prisoner swap.

“The process of finding and repatriating our other compatriots who went missing 
or were possibly taken prisoner is continuing intensively,” he said.

An Azerbaijani government agency announced the start of the exchange earlier in 
the day. It did not say how many Azerbaijanis have been returned home.

According to news reports, the Armenian side freed two Azerbaijani men who were 
detained in 2014 after crossing into the Kelbajar district which was handed back 
to Azerbaijan late last month. The men subsequently received long prison 
sentences after being convicted by a Karabakh court of murdering an Armenian 
teenager.

The November 10 truce agreement calls for the exchange of all prisoners of war 
(POWs) and civilians held by the conflicting sides.

Armenia’s and Karabakh’s closely integrated armed forces have not yet given the 
official number of Armenian POWs. According to officials in Yerevan and 
Stepanakert, Azerbaijan has admitted holding fewer Armenian soldiers than were 
captured by it during the six-week war.

Karabakh’s human rights ombudsman said earlier this month that his office has 
identified about 60 Armenian POWs shown in videos widely circulated on 
Azerbaijani social media accounts.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 


San Francisco’s Mt. Davidson Cross, Dedicated to Armenian Genocide, Unveils Plans

December 14,  2020



Council of Armenian American Organizations of Northern California unveiled a new logo

SAN FRANCISCO–The Mt. Davidson Cross Armenian Council also known as the Council of Armenian American Organizations of Northern California (CAAONC) is closing out 2020 with positive momentum.

Along with the addition of six new members from various Bay Area organizations, the Council has a new name and logo. The new logo showcases the majesty of the Cross and its surrounding landscape while also representing San Francisco.

A newly created video has been released to highlight the Council’s mission and recent accomplishments. The video was created by community member and professional videographer, Anthony Catchadoorian of San Francisco.

In November of this year, Chairperson Sevag Kevranian announced a donation to support Armenia Fund on behalf of the Mt. Davidson Cross Armenian Council. This donation was publicized during the annual Thanksgiving Day Armenia Fund Telethon.

Over 30 local Armenian churches and organizations came together in 1997 to purchase and preserve the Cross atop Mt. Davidson from demolition. They dedicated the Cross to the memory of the 1.5 million martyrs of the Armenian Genocide of 1915. The 103-foot tall Cross sits high above the city skyline at 928 feet, representing the highest point in San Francisco.

The Council remains proudly committed to the stewardship of Mt. Davidson Cross but the challenges of owning a historical landmark open to the public continue. Please consider making a financial contribution to support the preservation and maintenance of the Cross at www.mountdavidsoncross.org.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 12/14/2020

                                        Monday, 

U.S., French Envoys Explore Renewed Karabakh Talks


Armenia -- The U.S. and French co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group and other 
diplomats meet with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, Yerevan, December 
14, 2020.

U.S. and French mediators have visited Baku and Yerevan to explore the 
possibility of resuming Armenian-Azerbaijani peace talks following the war in 
Nagorno-Karabakh.

The two co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Groups traveled to the region to follow up 
on a December 3 statement by Russia’s and France’s foreign ministers and U.S. 
Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun calling on Armenia and Azerbaijan to 
“take advantage of the current ceasefire to negotiate a lasting and sustainable 
peace agreement.”

The statement also urged the conflicting parties to meet the U.S., Russian and 
French diplomats co-heading the OSCE Minsk Group and “commit to substantive 
negotiations to resolve all outstanding issues in accordance with an agreed 
timetable.”

The Russian co-chair, Igor Popov, did not join his French and U.S. counterparts, 
Stephane Visconti and Andrew Schofer, in meeting with Armenia’s and Azerbaijan’s 
leaders. Moscow gave no reason for Popov’s conspicuous absence. It was 
represented at the talks by Russian diplomats based in Baku and Yerevan.

According to an Armenian government statement, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
discussed with the visiting mediators on Monday ways of restarting peace process 
more than one month after Russia brokered an agreement to stop the war in 
Karabakh.

The statement cited Pashinian as saying that the United States, Russia and 
France should resume their joint efforts to achieve a “comprehensive settlement” 
of the Karabakh conflict. He stuck to the official Armenian line that Karabakh’s 
predominantly ethnic Armenian population must be able to exercise its right to 
self-determination as part of that settlement.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev met with Schofer and Visconti on Saturday. He 
reiterated that Baku essentially resolved the long-running conflict during the 
six-week war which resulted in sweeping Azerbaijani territorial gains.

Aliyev again blamed Pashinian for the war, saying that the Armenian leader 
“ruined the negotiations with provocative actions and statements.” He also 
lambasted the Minsk Group, saying that it has failed to achieve a peaceful 
solution to the conflict.



IMF Approves $37 Million Loan Tranche To Armenia


U.S. -- An exterior view of the building of the International Monetary Fund 
(IMF), with the IMG logo, is seen in Washington, March 27, 2020

The International Monetary Fund has disbursed a fresh $37 million installment of 
a loan designed to help Armenia cope with the coronavirus pandemic and economic 
consequences.

The loan tranche brought to about $332 million the total amount of funds 
allocated to the country under the IMF’s Stand-By Arrangement worth $443 million.

The IMF approved the lending program in May as the Armenian economy plunged into 
recession after three years of robust growth. The decision came shortly after 
the Armenian government announced plans to borrow around $540 million to offset 
a major shortfall in tax revenues and finance its efforts to contain the 
pandemic.

Armenia’s economic woes were compounded by the war in Nagorno-Karabakh that 
broke out in late September and was stopped by a Russian-brokered ceasefire six 
weeks later.

In a weekend statement announcing the disbursement, the IMF said that the 
Armenian economy is on course to contract by more than 7 percent this year 
seeing as “the full impact of the twin crises is still unfolding.”

“The Fund’s financial support will help Armenia meet these challenges, including 
the urgent social and economic implications of COVID-19 pandemic,” read the 
statement.

“The authorities have responded proactively to mitigate the socioeconomic and 
health effects of these shocks,” it quoted Tao Zhang, the IMF’s deputy managing 
director, as saying.

“The authorities’ 2021 budget is appropriate given weak growth and is embedded 
in a clear medium-term fiscal strategy. The authorities remain committed to 
taking measures to safeguard debt sustainability as a result of which public 
debt is expected to fall to around 60 percent of GDP over the medium-term,” 
added Zhang.

In its draft budget debated by the Armenian parliament, the government projected 
a GDP growth rate of 3.2 percent for next year.

The IMF expects the Armenian economy to expand by only 1 percent in 2021. Its 
statement said in this regard that the country’s economic outlook is “contingent 
upon the anticipated global recovery and domestic reform implementation.”

The Armenian currency, the dram, has weakened against the U.S. dollar by almost 
6 percent in the last two months.



Pashinian Again Rules Out Resignation


Armenia -- Amenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian addresses the nation, Yerevan, 
November 14, 2020.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian continued to reject on Monday opposition calls 
for his resignation backed by President Armen Sarkissian, the Armenian Apostolic 
Church and public figures in Armenia and its worldwide Diaspora.

“Rumors are being constantly circulated about my resignation, even though I have 
made clear that I will give up the status bestowed on me by the people only on 
the basis of credible results of an expression of the people’s will,” Pashinian 
said in a televised address to the nation. “As long as there has been no such 
expression of the will I will continue to perform my duties.”

“I want to again emphasize that the number one challenge now is to stabilize the 
security environment around Armenia, and we are going to consistently follow 
that path,” he added.

Pashinian did not explicitly express his readiness for snap parliamentary 
elections, also demanded by opposition forces blaming him for the Armenian 
side’s defeat in the Nagorno-Karabakh war. Instead, he again accused them of 
seeking “leave the people out” of political processes in the country.

One of Pashinian’s close associates indicated last week that the ruling 
political team is ready to discuss with the Armenian opposition the possibility 
of fresh elections. Opposition parties said afterwards that they have received 
no such offers from the government yet.


ARMENIA -- A placard with an image of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian is seen 
lying on the ground among coins during a rally to demand his resignation, 
December 10, 2020.

Most of them want of them want the elections to be held within a year by a new 
and interim government. The idea has also been advocated by Sarkissian.

“If you have a crisis, if you lose a war … you have to start anew. Otherwise the 
defeat will become an ordinary occurrence,” the president told CivilNet.am on 
Friday.

“You don’t need 200,000 or 300,000 [protesting] on the streets to have a crisis. 
You just need to see it. Therefore, the first step must be the resignation of 
the government and the formation of a [transitional] government.”

Sarkissian met over the weekend with Vazgen Manukian, a veteran politician 
nominated as a caretaker prime minister by a coalition of more than a dozen 
opposition parties holding anti-government protests in Yerevan and other parts 
of the country. The protests were due to continue later on Monday.

Manukian was also received by Catholicos Garegin II, the supreme head of the 
Armenian Apostolic Church. Garegin and other top clergymen of the church too 
have urged Pashinian to hand over power to an interim government tasked with 
holding the elections.

Pashinian came under fresh opposition fire on Saturday as Azerbaijani troops 
seized two more villages in Nagorno-Karabakh’s southern Hadrut district which 
was mostly occupied by them during the six-week war.


NAGORNO-KARABAKH -- Russian soldiers of the peacekeeping force man a checkpoint 
on a road outside Stepanakert, November 26, 2020

Russian peacekeepers stationed in Karabakh rushed to the scene of the fighting 
in the following hours. “The situation in that area has been normalized,” their 
commander, Major-General Rustam Muradov, stated on Sunday.

Pashinian discussed the situation with members of Armenia’s Security Council and 
other officials at an emergency meeting held on Sunday. He accused Azerbaijan of 
violating key terms of a Russian-mediated ceasefire agreement that stopped the 
war on November 10. Citing the same agreement, he also said he expects the 
Russian peacekeepers to help place the two Hadrut villages back under Karabakh 
Armenian control.

In his televised remarks aired the following morning, the Armenian premier 
accused his political opponents of disseminating false rumors about additional 
Armenian territorial concessions made to Azerbaijan in a bid to spread panic and 
discredit his government. He claimed that the anti-government campaign of 
“information terrorism” is partly “managed from abroad” but did not elaborate.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 


The US can help prevent the destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh. Here’s how.

Medium.com, Cornell University
Dec 14 2020

Cornell University

Dec 14 · 5 min read

The incoming Biden administration must adopt a multi-pronged strategy to prevent the destruction of Armenian monuments.

By Lori Khatchadourian and Adam Smith

In late September, a brutal war broke out between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the mountainous enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh — adding another tragic chapter to one of the longest-running conflicts in the world. Cities and villages were routinely shelled, killing scores of civilians, until last month when a ceasefire agreement brought the fighting to a halt. A period of violent devastation is over. But as the parties strive to achieve an elusive, lasting peace, the region’s irreplaceable cultural monuments are in peril. Washington must act. There are steps that the U.S. can take right now to help prevent a heritage calamity.

The terms of the ceasefire were shaped by the results of the latest round of fighting. Azerbaijani forces regained control of seven territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh that had been occupied by Armenian forces for nearly three decades, following victories they secured in the nineties. Armenians have now evacuated these regions, but they left behind over 1500 Christian monuments, including active monasteries and rare treasures of medieval church architecture.

As archaeologists who have worked in the region for decades, we are concerned by what this change of borders may portend. Nagorno-Karabakh’s deep history has been fought over as bitterly as its present status and there is justifiable fear that the conflict’s violence will be transferred from the battlefield to the region’s cultural heritage.

Armenian monuments in the territories that have fallen under Azerbaijani control face the real threat of secretive, state-sponsored demolition. Between 1997 and 2006, Azerbaijan sought to fully erase the traces of Armenians in its southwestern Nakhchivan region, destroying 89 medieval churches, 5840 sacred cross-stones, or khachkars, and 22,000 historical tombstones. Even though this destruction has been documented with satellite and photographic evidence, Azerbaijan has denied it, and has barred international teams from inspecting the sites.

A more subtle tactic of heritage erasure is the falsification of the past. One day after the ceasefire went into effect, Azerbaijan’s Minister of Culture tweeted that a 9th-13th century Armenian monastery called Dadivank, whose long-term jurisdiction is uncertain, was “one of the best testimonies of ancient Caucasian Albanian civilization,” despite the many Armenian inscriptions that adorn its walls. The site was not created by “Caucasian Albania,” a kingdom that fell in roughly the 8th century. Azerbaijani historians have repeatedly drawn questionable linkages between Caucasian Albania and Turkic Azerbaijan in an attempt to establish indigeneity and develop a counter history to the long occupation of Armenians in the region. A few modifications to these churches and monasteries — an erased Armenian inscription here or there — and “Caucasian Albania” will have a new site added to its inventory. Heritage appropriation is just as toxic to our understanding of the human past as its silent demolition. Appropriated sites linger as heritage zombies, neither fully extinguished nor truly alive.

America remained disengaged during the fighting, and Washington was entirely cut out of the ceasefire negotiations in which Russia played the leading role. But the current fate of these monuments poses a test case for President-elect Joseph Biden, who has outlined a policy of global engagement, in stark contrast to President Trump. In 2017, Trump withdrew America from the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) — the only multinational state-led agency whose mission includes the protection of heritage. Later, he went further in his disregard for global heritage, famously threatening to bomb Iranian cultural sites.

We believe that the Biden administration can pursue three strategies to begin restoring America’s role as a global leader in the protection of cultural heritage, beginning with the lands under contention in and around Nagorno-Karabakh.

First, America must engage in bilateral diplomacy with Azerbaijan, to clearly communicate that the destruction of Armenian monuments will not be tolerated. It must be made clear that attacks on heritage sites will result in a consequential U.S. response. This would fit with policy objectives that Biden has previously discussed, including his interest in promoting democracy and eradicating corruption in authoritarian countries like Azerbaijan.

Second, Biden must swiftly re-engage America with UNESCO. To be sure, the organization is not a panacea. Its World Heritage Committee is often overseen by the very states that it needs to hold accountable. The organization’s responses are also often marred by political deal-making. But for all its flaws, it has a role to play in protecting imperiled sites. By rejoining, the United States can help shape UNESCO’s priorities in Nagorno-Karabakh and elsewhere. This may also be an area of potential cooperation with Russia. In recent weeks, the Kremlin has recognized the threats to Armenian heritage in the region and has called on UNESCO to intervene. As a party to UNESCO, the U.S. should offer assistance in the training of Russian peacekeepers for cultural heritage protection.

Lastly, the Biden administration needs to help stand up a program of heritage monitoring similar to the Syrian Cultural Heritage Initiative, developed in 2014. That effort focused on tracking physical damage caused by both state actors and looting during wartime. In the case of Nagorno-Karabakh, there is the opportunity to not just document heritage destruction but possibly deter it through regular, highly visible long-term surveillance efforts. We urge the State Department to grant American archaeologists who specialize in this region access to high-resolution satellite imagery. This will allow us to mount the first program of long-term, systematic satellite-based monitoring during peacetime in a region of intense cultural discord. Such work could create a template for heritage protection in other ceasefire agreements around the globe where cultural heritage is imperiled. Protecting cultural heritage sites will be vital to building the kind of trust that will be central to any long-term peace in the region.

On October 13, 2020, as the fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh raged, Biden released a strongly-worded statement bemoaning America’s lack of engagement, and calling on the Trump Administration to “tell Azerbaijan that it will not tolerate its efforts to impose a military solution to this conflict.” This January, Biden will be in the White House. Protecting these monuments — objects of historical importance and deep cultural and emotional attachment — may help strengthen the fragile, uncertain pathway to peace.

Lori Khatchadourian, Associate Professor, Department of Near Eastern Studies
Adam T. Smith, Professor, Anthropology
Cornell Universit
y