Ruling party says Customs Union decision meets Armenia’s national in

Ruling party says Customs Union decision meets Armenia’s national interests

NEWS | 06.09.13 | 09:30

The executive body of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia (RPA)
gathered on Thursday evening to discuss the results of Tuesday’s
working visit of President Serzh Sargsyan to Moscow during which it
was announced that Armenia will become part of the Russia-led Customs
Union.

At a news briefing following the meeting RPA spokesman Edward
Sharmazanov stressed that the decision to join the Customs Union meets
the national interests of Armenia.

He reiterated that the announcement in Moscow was anything but a
sensation as it reflected the position that Armenia has advocated for
years.

`For many years we have clearly stated that integration processes in
Eurasian space are very important to us and that Eurasian and European
integrations are mutually complementary processes,’ Sharmazanov said.

Earlier, the European Union, with which Armenia for nearly four years
has been negotiating an Association Agreement and an opportunity of
forming a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) as part of
this deal, said it expected explanations from Yerevan in connection
with the move.

Some officials in Brussels reiterated that the implementation of DCFTA
would be incompatible with Armenia’s membership in the Customs Union
with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Armenia, meanwhile, has indicated
that it is still willing to continue political dialogue with Brussels
and is prepared to initial the Association Agreement at the EU Eastern
Partnership summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, in November.

Sharmazanov, who is also deputy speaker of parliament, said that like
any international agreement or treaty the Customs Union agreement will
also have to pass parliamentary ratification in Armenia. He said that
the parliament will thus become the place where political debate
around this decision will unfold.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armenianow.com/news/48249/armenia_ruling_party_customs_union_russia

Patriarch Laham: Most world countries support political solution in

Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA)
September 7, 2013 Saturday

Patriarch Laham: Most world countries support political solution in Syria

Provinces, (SANA) – A joint prayer was held at Lady of Dormition
Cathedral in al-Zaitoun quarter in Damascus in response to Pope
Francis’ call for observing a day of fasting and prayer worldwide for
security and stability in Syria and against any military aggression on
it.

Greek Catholic Patriarch Gregorios III Laham of Antioch and All East,
who presided upon the prayers, said most countries in the world
support a political solution to the crisis in Syria and few want
military action, saying that this is “the beginning of victory.”
Patriarch Laham thanked all those who oppose aggression against Syria,
especially Pope Francis who turned the whole world into a church and
mosque and a worshipping place to say “No to war.” The Patriarch added
that the Syrians all over the world have a responsibility to convey
the true image of Syria as the land of harmony, love and coexistence.

He said that Pope Francis ‘ wonderful and unique initiative during
these difficult times is a message of peace and reassurance to all the
people of Syria.

Patriarch Laham said that the terrorist attack on Maaloula should
resound around the world to signal the end of the crisis and restore
peace to Syria, praying for Maaloula which has joined other areas in
Syria that were shaken by armed groups.

He addressed the faithful in Syria, telling them not to be afraid and
to remain, saying “we will stay here… we will build a modern renewed
Syria… we will all stay; Christians and Muslims of all sects.” In
turn, Greek Melkite Patriarchal Deputy, Archbishop Joseph al-Absi,
said that violence never leads to peace, appealing to the
international community to make efforts and bring about clear peace
initiatives based on dialogue.

For his part, Armenian Catholic Archbishop Joseph Arnaout called for
praying for Syria and its people and for God to preserve them and
bring epace to it and to the Middle East.

Patriarch Iwas calls for a day of fasting on Saturday for peace in
Syria In the same context, Patriarch of Antioch and All the East
Supreme Head of the Universal Syriac Orthodox Church, Ignatius Zakka I
Iwas, called all Christians for a day of fasting for peace in Syria
and all countries of the world on Saturday 7 September.

Committing to Pope Francis call for a world day of prayer and fasting
for peace in Syria, the Middle East and the Whole world on Saturday 7
September, Patriarch Iwas called, in a statement on Friday, for
dictating Saturday to be a day for prayer and fasting for peace in
Syria and the whole countries of the world.

The statement also called for praying for the release of the kidnapped
archbishops, Boulos al-Yazigi, archbishop of the Greek Orthodox of
Aleppo and Iskandaroun and Yuhanna Ibrahim, the Syrian-Orthodox
metropolitan of Aleppo.

Prayers for peace in the churches of Lattakia Prayers were held in the
churches of Lattakia city in response to Pope Francis ‘ call for
praying for peace in Syria.

Attendants prayed for peace in Syria, overcoming the current crisis,
the return of abductees, and the recovery of the injured.

Churches of Daraa hold prayers for Syria Churches in the southern city
of Daraa responded to the Pope’s call by holding prayers and calls for
the protection of Syria.

The prayers asked God to ward off wars and their evils from Syria and
disseminate amity and tranquility among its people who have been
suffering greatly over more than two years due to the terrorists’
crimes.

English Bulletin

From: Baghdasarian

Separate Seating: Main Purpose of G20 Summit

Izvestiya, Russia
Sept 5 2013

Separate Seating.

Political Analyst Boris Mezhuyev on Main Purpose of G20 Summit

[translated from Russian]

Observers from all over the world will be in front of their television
screens tomorrow looking for just one thing: how the leaders of Russia
and the United States relate to one another, whether they look one
another in the eye, whether they smile at one another or shake hands,
and, if they do shake hands, how firmly they do so. And that aspect of
the upcoming meeting will exercise observers much more even than such
acute issues of the current agenda as preventing another twist to the
world economic crisis and the need for consolidated action by the
monetary authorities, which was supposed to be the focus of the
upcoming G20 session. It looks as though the heads of state will make
only routine, protocol speeches on ecological questions and on the
subject of the danger from asteroids, which Russia introduced.

Obviously, what everyone will have on their minds is not even the
situation in Syria but first and foremost the attitude of all the
other members of the Group towards Russia in connection with Syria.
The Anglo-Saxon press most frequently refers to Russia, like Iran, as
one of the parties involved in the internal war in that state: It sees
Russia and Iran on one side (note: not China, which along with Russia
objects to the unilateral use of force) and Saudi Arabia and Turkey on
the other. The dispute is over whether America should join with the
latter or stand aside from the conflict.

Such an open split among the main members of the international
community has not been seen in a long time. In 2003 Russia, along with
France and Germany, opposed Bush’s plan to occupy Iraq, but no one
said that Russia was involving itself in the conflict on Saddam
Husayn’s side.

Aware of the full seriousness of the situation that has taken shape,
Vladimir Putin stated in his interview with Channel One and Associated
Press that Russia may change its position on the Syrian question in
the Security Council if the Americans and their allies present
convincing proof of Al-Asad’s complicity in the chemical attack in
East Guta. This is a very precise diplomatic manoeuvre – a kind of
response to Barack Obama’s evasive decision to postpone any possible
military action pending the support of both houses of Congress. The
move is clearly a polite invitation to the American President to join
in constructive cooperation on the Syrian problem – as if to say: We
are not enemies, we understand your difficult position, and we are
ready to help you extricate yourself from it. The complimentary
comments about Obama and the very correct explanation of our country’s
position in the Snowden affair – in the spirit of the need to respect
Russia’s prestige as a state, without any ostentatious
anti-Americanism – are confirmation of this very clearly expressed
desire to support Obama. To support him if, of course, he shows
himself ready to accept that support.

The whole question now, strictly speaking, turns on what kind of a
world the White House boss is living in right now. To what extent does
he really believe McCain, Lindsey Graham, and his own immediate
entourage when they tell him that Russia is an enemy to America and
represents civilizational evil incarnate, a country where – as the
British actor Stephen Fry, clearly no friend to Russia, says
-homosexuals kill themselves in despair, where they are regularly
beaten up by club-wielding skinheads and shot by police?

Well, it would seem that in order to actually resolve this whole
conflict in Syria, which he finds so unpleasant, Obama ought first of
all to ask Russia for assistance and, to that end, upgrade its status
just a little in the international field. Or in any event not portray
it as some kind of medieval despotism. Yet for the past several months
Obama has talked about Russia only in terms of some hackneyed
nonsense. It has to be admitted that Moscow’s clever boys have played
into his hands in that respect with their highly untimely conservative
legislative initiatives. But this era of rather flippant game-playing
with our cultural contrasts seems to have ended: At any rate, judging
from Putin’s interview Russia has stopped playing that particular
game. And it is clear why: Faced with a world war, it is possible to
forget for a time about nuances in attitudes towards the unhappy
champions of same-sex love.

But as yet Obama has not openly given a single indication of being
well disposed towards Russia. It may be that secretly, via channels
inaccessible to the press, the Russian and American sides are
conducting consultations of some kind (one would like to hope so), but
all we know for the time being is that Obama is preparing to meet in
St Petersburg with human rights organizations including activists from
the LGBT community. Yet even the Cold War forced leaders to take the
politics seriously to some extent, so that Khrushchev was able to
reach agreement with Kennedy at the crucial moment and Nixon with Mao,
and none of them thought about whether a particular conversation or a
particular handshake would appear to be adding an extra few cents to
his opposite number’s “soft power” account.

What does “soft power” matter, for heaven’s sake, when the survival of
civilization is actually at stake? Because, no matter how things may
appear, the affair will not be limited to a couple of strikes against
one country. To begin with the United States will hit Syria, then
Israel will attack the Hizballah movement in Lebanon, then Iran will
strike Israel, Turkey will attack Iran, Azerbaijan will attack
Armenia, then Georgia will strike into South Ossetia again and of
course Russia will be forced, as in 2008, to repel Georgia, and the
NATO navy will rush to Georgia’s aid once more. I am not trying to
predict the future but merely identifying the likely dangers if the
situation gets out of control. It may be that Israel has no plans to
settle accounts directly with Hizballah and that Baku has no plans to
take the conflict with Yerevan into a hot phase; but the problem is
that a major war provides a fine pretext for resolving chronic
territorial disputes. And a third world war could flare up even
without any intention on the part of the United States and Russia of
exchanging thermonuclear strikes. Simply because, while Russia and the
United States are trying not to look one another in the eye, under the
wing of their powerful patrons their “friends” are making their own
arrangements. The First World War, by the way, began in precisely that
way, even though nobody actually wanted it. It was simply that Russia
and Germany considered themselves “obligated to defend” their allies.

So tomorrow’s G20 meeting is a last opportunity for Russia and America
to agree on some kind of joint action plan. It will be a great pity
if, in Petersburg, Obama prefers instead to discuss the sufferings of
Russian gays and averts his eyes from his Russian colleague to smile
sweetly at the Turks and the Saudis.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Georgian officials, MPs react to Armenian statement on re-opening ra

Rustavi-2 TV, Georgia
Sept 6 2013

Georgian officials, MPs react to Armenian statement on re-opening railway line

[Translated from Georgian]

Georgian officials and MPs have unanimously denied the statement by
the Armenian Security Council Secretary Artur Baghdasaryan that
Russia, Georgia, and Georgia’s breakaway Abkhazia have agreed to
reopen the railway line connecting Armenia with Russia.

The railway line has been blocked since the start of the
Georgian-Abkhaz conflict in 1992.

“No one has given such permission and no one has voiced the readiness
or decision. In general, the railway problem is a very interesting
issue, which can be in our economic interests. When talk about the
problem started, we said that the Georgian government would not do
anything that is not in its interests. Unfolding events will show what
may be in its interests. However, disseminated reports saying that
permission has been issued and some agreement has been reached are not
true,” Rustavi-2 showed Georgian Foreign Minister Maia Panjikidze
saying.

“There was a certain stir raised in our media five or six months ago.
In my opinion, we gave a full answer regarding this problem at that
time. We said that we were not holding talks with Russia on this issue
and we are not talking with Russia on restoring the railway line
across Abkhazia. I can unambiguously confirm the same thing now. As a
rule, such things cannot be concealed. We are not speaking with Russia
on this issue,” Georgian Prime Minister’s Special Envoy for relations
with Russia Zurab Abashidze told Rustavi-2. “This issue was not at all
discussed within the framework of my dialogue with [Russian Deputy
Foreign Minister] Mr [Grigoriy] Karasin. Therefore, it is difficult
for me to say now, where this information has come from,” Abashidze
added. At the same time, Abashidze said that “if there is an
initiative or proposal on Russia’s part, we are ready to hear what
their idea of restoring the railway line is”. “We are not saying that
we will never speak about it,” Abashidze said, adding that “if this
happens, of course, it must happen based on the principle of Georgia’s
territorial integrity”.

“Georgia’s strategic interest lies in implementing the
Kars-Akhalkalaki project, which is already being implemented. This is
a project that connects Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey with Europe.
It is a serious project that is advantageous for Georgia economically
and geopolitically. It connects Georgia with its strategic partners.
It is a very important project for the whole region and Georgia. It is
important for our sovereignty and our economy,” Rustavi-2 showed
Georgian National Security Council Secretary and Georgian President
Mikheil Saakashvili’s close ally Giorgi Bokeria saying. “As regards
the idea of restoring this railway line and so forth, this project is
linked to: a) serious risks, because we should be very careful, where
the Russian Federation is our partner; and b) particularly because it
goes across the occupied territory. We should take all these
difficulties into account when implementing this project. In a few
words, the implementation of such a project would be possible if it
were part of a package that resolves the problem of de-occupation,”
Bokeria added, expressing hope that the Georgian government would not
make a “fundamental mistake that would damage our country’s
interests”.

MP Giorgi Gabashvili of the pro-presidential United National Movement
told Rustavi-2 that Georgia’s territories were “occupied” by Russia,
so Georgia’s national interests should be taken into account when
discussing such issues. Gabashvili stressed that the opening of the
railway line was “contrary to Georgia’s national interests” and added:
“The public should have full and exhaustive information about that. If
something like that has happened, we should not be hearing it from the
Armenian media”.

“Our opponents sometimes invent things and then build stories on them.
I do not know precisely the context in which the secretary of the
Armenian Security Council made the statement. but there is one thing
that I know: People thought about restoring the Abkhaz railway and
developing economic projects and of course, they are thinking about
that now too, but you, journalists, are well aware that there can be
and there is no talk about any decision on this issue, given the fact
that it is one thing to discuss something and it is another thing to
make a decision at the government level,” MP Viktor Dolidze of the
Georgian Dream coalition told Rustavi-2.

Public protests in Yerevan against Armenia joining the Customs Union

WPS Agency, Russia
September 6, 2013 Friday

PUBLIC PROTESTS IN YEREVAN AGAINST ARMENIA JOINING THE CUSTOMS UNION

by Tigran Oganesyan, Yerevan
Source: Izvestia (Moscow), N166, 06.09.2013, p. 7

[Translated from Russian]

The demonstration held in front of the residence of the head of state
in Yerevan united hundreds of people who were dissatisfied with the
statement of President Serzh Sargsyan’s accession to the Customs Union
(CU). Participants chanted, “No return to the USSR!”, “Russians, go
away!”, “Putinka!”, “Natasha!” and held banners saying: “We do not
want back to the Soviet Union”; “We are no vassals of Russia”.

The authorities even had to use force. The police pulled the most
active protesters of the crowd, pushed them into a car and took away.
According to eyewitnesses, about 11 people were arrested.

One of the organizers of the rally, chairman of the “Asbarez” Gyumri
Journalists Club Levon Barsegyan explained: “The essence of the
protest is not joining the CU, but the fact that President Sargsyan
spoke on behalf of Armenia without having that right, because he did
not know the view of the people. Even if there were any studies, he
first had to submit them to the public, and only then share that data
with the leader of the Russian state”.

At the same time, according to the organizers, the picket cannot be
considered entirely anti-Russian, but sooner anti-presidential. It was
only after the brutal dispersal of the protesters people started
calling the police, “Natasha” (so they call the easily available women
in Turkey and the Caucasus).

Barsegyan regrets: “For the past four years the entire state machine
has been working on an agreement on associated membership in the EU,
and in one day it all went down the drain. After all, if the country
becomes a CU member, it will be unable to keep its sovereignty, and
negotiations with the EU on a free trade zone will be impossible”.

The “Heritage” and “Free Democrats” opposition parties also made a
condemning statement. The document reads that “after joining the CU,
Armenia would lose such important attributes of independence as the
implementation of an independent foreign policy and an independent
financial and economic activity”.

A statement by President Sargsyan on Armenia’s accession to the CU he
made in Moscow on September 3 after his meeting with Vladimir Putin
appeared the cause of unrest. For many people it was a surprise.
Indeed, over the last year, Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisyan has
repeatedly stated that joining the CU was geographically impossible,
since there is no common border between Armenia and the CU member
countries.

However, according to political analysts, the lack of common borders
is no problem.

Chairman of the Association of Political Scientists of Armenia Amayak
Ovannisyan believes: “The issue can be solved if the rail link with
Russia is provided via Abkhazia. Moreover, Georgia has repeatedly
stated that it is ready to resume the work of the Abkhazian section of
the railway”.

According to the political analyst, after joining the CU Armenia will
be able to revive its chemical industry with the Russian assistance,
and to resume supplying products to the Russian Federation. For
example, the Russian direct investment will help restart the “Nairit”
plant for the production of rubber.

Joining the CU would also be beneficial to the economy of the
unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, which will be able to take
full advantage of direct access to the Russian market, and get major
investment.

Member of the Commission on Economic Affairs of the National Assembly
of Armenia Vagram Bagdasaryan says: “The decision to join the Customs
Union is a result of the policy pursued by the country in recent
years. We have always had close economic ties with Russia, and such a
decision should not be a surprise”.

According to him, after Armenia joins the CU, the Armenian businessmen
will have no problems with the customs, documentation on the export
and import of goods, or any other bureaucratic obstacles to trade with
Russia at all.

Actually, Yerevan still cherishes a hope that it will be able to
combine the membership in the CU and the associated membership in the
EU. The European Commission’s official website issued a statement that
the Republic’s involvement in a free trade zone with the European
Union, and economic cooperation within the CIS are compatible.
However, the Commission still does not understand how Yerevan will do
it, and is “looking forward to the solution of the Armenian side,
after which it will be possible to draw conclusions about a further
development course”.

From: Baghdasarian

Proposed reverse takeover lifts APS shares

The Straits Times (Singapore)
September 6, 2013 Friday

Proposed reverse takeover lifts APS shares
Cemetery operator to get mining exploration rights in Armenia as part of deal

Mok Fei Fei

SHARES of cemetery operator Asia-Pacific Strategic Investments (APS)
more than doubled in price after news of a potential reverse takeover
deal.

The stock added 10.3 cents to close at 18.6 cents with 9.7 million
shares changing hands after a trading halt was lifted at 3.17pm
yesterday.

Catalist-listed APS called for the halt on Wednesday morning and
issued a statement yesterday announcing that it had entered into a
non-binding memorandum of understanding with investor George H.
Richmond.

Under the deal, APS will buy 100 per cent of Mr Richmond’s Coeur Gold
Armenia, which holds two mining exploration rights in Armenia.

The rights to mine for gold, silver, antimony and copper began last
November and will last for 25 years, APS said.

It will pay for the mining rights in cash and with new shares.

Mr Richmond is expected to hold 60 per cent of the proposed enlarged
share capital after the reverse takeover exercise.

As part of the deal, China Global Energy & Resources (CGER), a Chinese
firm engaged in a diverse range of businesses including mining, will
also come on board as an investor.

CGER will inject $200 million to subscribe for about 30 per cent of
APS’ enlarged share capital.

The deal values APS at $667 million.

APS chief financial officer Lee Keng Mun told The Straits Times
yesterday: “It is a very attractive and profitable deal. It shows that
Singapore companies that have clean balance sheets and structures are
still appealing.”

He added that APS does not plan to sell off its bereavement business for now.

This is not the first time that APS has attempted a reverse takeover.

In April last year, it announced it was buying the rights to convert
up to seven oil-based generation units into coal-based power
generators in Pakistan via such an exercise. However, it announced in
May this year that the deal was off.

The proposed new deal is subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals.

From: Baghdasarian

Transparency International Anti-Corruption Center in Armenia Condemn

Targeted News Service
September 6, 2013 Friday 11:59 PM EST

Transparency International Anti-Corruption Center in Armenia Condemns
Attack on Its Representatives

BERLIN

Transparency International issued the following news release:

Transparency International Anti-corruption Center, the Armenian
National Chapter of Transparency International, strongly condemns a
physical attack on its representatives earlier this week and demands
an immediate investigation.

In the evening of 5 September a group of about half a dozen unknown
assailants in Yerevan attacked Suren Saghatelyan, a board member of
Transparency International Anti-corruption Center (TIAC) and Haykak
Arshamyan, a member of the Chapter. Arshamyan suffered cuts around his
nose and mouth, while Saghatelyan suffered a deep bruise on his head
and a broken nose and fingers.

Neither of these two long-time civil activists is affiliated with any
political party and they have acted without violating any laws or
regulations.

Unfortunately this act of violence was not the first such act
committed against members of civil society in Armenia who have
protested decisions and steps undertaken by the government in recent
weeks.

We suspect these acts of violence are aimed at stopping the growing
protest movements against the government.

These acts of violence against us and other NGOs are acts of terror
and if they are not investigated and those guilty not punished, then
full responsibility for them will rest on the current government.

Contact: Varuzhan Hoktanyan, Executive Director, 410/569-910,
[email protected]

From: A. Papazian

Armenian language is subject of 17th annual Vardanants Day lecture

The Library of Congress, DC
Sept 6 2013

ARMENIAN LANGUAGE IS SUBJECT OF 17TH ANNUAL VARDANANTS DAY LECTURE

Renowned linguist Charles de Lamberterie will deliver the 17th Annual
Vardanants Day Armenian Lecture at noon on Thursday, Sept. 19 in the
Northeast Pavilion of the Library’s Thomas Jefferson Building, located
at 10 First Street S.E., Washington D.C. Titled “The Armenian Language
and its Place in the Indo-European Linguistic Family,” the lecture
will be delivered in English.

In recent decades there has been renewed interest in Indo-European
linguistics as new theories about the original homeland of the
Indo-Europeans have been advanced. Some have recently placed the
origins of this linguistic group, which includes the European Romance
languages as well as Persian and Armenian, in Anatolia, a region today
contained within Turkey.

A professor at the Universite Paris-Sorbonne, de Lamberterie has
written and lectured extensively on both Armenian and Greek
Indo-European linguistics. He was inducted into France’s prestigious
Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres in 2010.

The lecture series is sponsored by the Near East Section of the
Library’s African and Middle Eastern Division. It is named after the
Armenian holiday that commemorates the battle of Avarayr (451 A.D.).
The battle was led by the Armenian General Vardan Mamikonian and his
compatriots against invading Persian troops who were attempting to
reimpose Zoroastrianism on the Christian state. As a religious
holiday, it celebrates the Armenians’ triumph over forces of
assimilation.

Founded in 1800, the Library of Congress is the nation’s oldest
federal cultural institution. The Library seeks to spark imagination
and creativity and to further human understanding and wisdom by
providing access to knowledge through its magnificent collections,
publications, programs and exhibitions. Many of the Library’s rich
resources can be accessed through its website at

http://www.loc.gov

HRW: Personally Smeared for Uncovering Corruption in Azerbaijan

Human Rights Watch
September 6, 2013 Friday

Washington: Personally Smeared for Uncovering Corruption in Azerbaijan

Someone placed a hidden camera in Khadija Ismayilova’s bedroom. They
recorded her, planning to blackmail her and force her to give up
reporting. She is, after all, one of the few Azerbaijani journalists
who still have the courage to do hard hitting investigative work.
While threats from thugs convince other journalists to self-censor,
Khadija has reported extensively on government corruption – all the
way up to the family of the autocratic president, Ilham Aliyev,
himself the son of the country’s former president and former KGB
general.

I’ve known Khadija for five years and I call her my friend. I doubt it
was a coincidence that the sexually explicit video of Khadija and her
boyfriend surfaced soon after the American broadcaster CNBC aired a
segment entitled `Filthy Rich.’ It explored President Aliyev’s
family’s Dubai real estate holdings – including nine homes, worth tens
of millions of dollars, bought in 2009 by his pre-teen grandson.
Khadija had consulted for the report.

That video of Khadija – posted by a fake news website that pretended
to be connected with an opposition party – put her in physical danger.
Azerbaijan is a conservative country, and honor killings still take
place in some areas. Khadija is a charismatic and well-known
journalist in her late-30s, but people could decide to come after her.

This was in March 2012. The smear campaign continued, as Khadija
refused to back down and continued reporting. Only last week, a
newspaper associated with the ruling party ran an article titled,
`Khadija’s Armenian Mother Should Die.’ The false claims that
Khadija’s family is Armenian are dangerous – in the context of the
Armenian-Azerbaijan conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, being
labeled Armenian is like an accusation of treason and spying for the
enemy.

The article also mentioned the Baku neighborhood where Khadija’s mother lives.

I worry about Khadija. Sometimes, I’ve even said to her, `Maybe you
should not go out at night,’ or, `Maybe you should be more careful
about where you live and where you go.’ Many others have probably
suggested the same.

She had a straight answer for me. `That’s what they want,’ she said.
`They want to restrict me and not let me lead my normal life, and I’m
not going to give them that pleasure.’

I keep in close touch with Azerbaijan’s small but vibrant youth civil
society. The country is swimming in wealth from oil and natural gas,
but its human rights record has been poor for years. The government
has clamped down on rights since 2011, when a protest movement emerged
in the wake of the uprisings in the Arab world, mainly to protest
Azerbaijan’s corruption.

Since then, as my new report, Tightening the Screws, shows, the state
has really moved in to stop opposition political activity and social
media activism. The authorities are going after youth activists, a few
high-profile political activists, and others, to use them as examples
to scare their followers. Arrests have been arbitrary and prisoners
mistreated.

I grew up and live in Georgia, a southern Caucasus state neighboring
Azerbaijan, and I’ve researched human rights in this area since 2000,
10 of those years for Human Rights Watch. My work focuses on Georgia,
Azerbaijan, and Armenia. It’s a volatile region, where at times
activists work under tremendous stress and at great risk.

It was Georgia’s corrupt, bribe-driven process to gain admission to a
university in the mid-1990s that made injustice get under my skin. It
was the first time that kind of dirty dealing affected me.

In Georgia, you had to do more than pass university entrance exams to
get into a top university. You had to pay money to get in, which I
couldn’t afford and wouldn’t accept.

Although I passed all the necessary exams, I ended up spending hours
and hours arguing with examiners, proving that I deserved top grades
although I had refused to pay for them.

I succeeded, but the experience was eye-opening. Looking back – I was
only 16 at the time – I don’t know how I found the strength to force
my way through this process. It changed forever the way I thought
about injustice.

Georgia’s university admission system has been reformed since then,
but many other human rights problems persist. They include tepid
government responses to religious intolerance and homophobic violence,
police abuse, and poor conditions in detention.

Because of my years as a human rights researcher, I now personally
know many activists. Their enthusiasm, courage and dedication to
affect change is admirable and contagious. Many could have had an
easier life – a normal life – which is what most of us would do to
survive. In late July, the government of Azerbaijan gifted more than
150 flats to journalists in an apparent attempt to buy their loyalty.

Khadija was not one of them. Instead, she, along with dozens of
activists, is harassed or picked up by corrupt authorities on trumped
up charges before being tossed into a blatantly unfair legal system.

This is an increasing trend in Azerbaijan, as my report shows. Police
claim to find drugs on people who probably never used them. If thugs
beat up an activist and the victim reports it, police charge the
activist with hooliganism – with attacking their assailants. If an
activist is detained, their rights are often further undermined when
they can’t choose their own lawyer. There are televised confessions
gathered under suspicious circumstances. You don’t even need to
stretch your imagination to know that the charges are politically
motivated and intended to scare them into silence.

Khadija was never imprisoned for long, but others have been. A pair of
bloggers, Emin Milli and Adnan Hajizade, spent more than a year behind
bars after they created and posted a satirical YouTube video
criticizing the authorities. I spent months writing news releases and
holding advocacy meetings to urge their release. Finally, in 2010,
they were freed.

That made my day, my week, my year. You talk and you write and you
scream and you shout, but it can feel like you aren’t getting anything
done, because you have governments that avoid doing the right thing.
Any small change makes a big difference. It inspires you to keep on
doing the work that you do.

From: Baghdasarian

Georgia denies consent on re-opening Armenian-Russian railway via Ab

Xinhua General News Service
September 6, 2013 Friday 3:25 PM EST

Georgia denies consent on re-opening Armenian-Russian railway via Abkhaz link

TBILISI Sept. 6

The Georgian authorities on Friday described as not credible a
statement by a senior Armenian official on Georgia’s consent on
re-establishing the railway link between Armenia and Russia via
Abkhazia.

A Georgian government statement said no decision had been made
concerning the issue. “The government of Georgia showed interest in
this topic earlier and is now ready to discuss this initiative, though
this doesn’t mean that a decision has been made,” the statement said.

“We confirm that the government of Georgia is studying the issue of
restoring railway and considers that it may be interesting, but
there’s a long way to go before the decision. A lot of political and
technical issues need to be reviewed. There must be a discussion and
public opinion must be formed,” the statement added.

Earlier on Friday, Novosti Armenia, an Armenian news service, quoted
the country’s security council secretary Artur Baghdasaryan as saying
that Moscow, Tbilisi and Sokhumi had agreed to re-open the Abkhaz
section of the Armenian-Russian railway line.

“The Georgian side gave its consent; the Russian and Abkhaz sides did
it too. But we have to understand that there is a conflict situation,”
the security council secretary was quoted as saying.

“But it is important that there is a political will to re-open this
railway and in overall to develop the railway communication and it is
reflected in the joint statement (of Armenian and Russian
presidents),” the official added.

Georgian Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili said in March this year
that his government had a political will to re-open the
Georgian-Russian railway via Abkhazia but would take a cautious
approach as the issue should be resolved in the context of resolving
border problems related to Russia and to “occupied territories.”

Zurab Abashidze, Georgian prime minister’s special envoy on Russian
issues, said Friday that the issue of Abkhaz railway link had not been
raised in his talks with Russian deputy Foreign Minister Gregory
Karasin.

“But if there is any initiative from the Russian side, some kind of a
proposal, we are ready to listen how they view the re- opening of this
railway. We are not saying that we will never talk about it; we can
talk about it and listen to Russia’s view on the issue,” the envoy
said.

Georgia’s national security council secretary Giga Bokeria warned that
re-opening the Abkhaz railway link constitutes ” serious risks.”

Abkhazia pronounced independence after the 1991-1994 Georgian civil
war and re-pronounced independence in the wake of the 2008 conflict
between Georgia and Russia in South Ossetia. Georgia claims
sovereignty Abkhazia.