Human Rights Watch Address To Justice Minister

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ADDRESS TO JUSTICE MINISTER

Panorama.am
14:19 30/07/2009

Human Rights Watch organization addressed open letter to Armenian
Justice Ministry expressing deep concern about Arman Babajanyan’s
health condition. The address to Justice Minister Gevorg Danielyan
says: "We are writing regarding Arman Babajanyan, whose prison
term, three-and-a-half-year, is discharging. We have learned that
Mr. Babajanian has been diagnosed with a brain tumor, which is
affecting his eyesight and requires urgent medical intervention. We are
very concerned about his health and therefore ask for your immediate
intervention."

Turkish FM Comments On Serzh Sargsyan’s Statement

TURKISH FM COMMENTS ON SERZH SARGSYAN’S STATEMENT

Panorama.am
14:09 30/07/2009

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmed Davutoglu made a statement yesterday
related to the regulation of Armenian-Turkish ties. In fact, the
Turkish FM’s statement could be regarded as a response to Armenian
President Serzh Sargsyan’s July 28 statement that he will only accept
the invitation if the agreements are observed and visible steps are
taken, i.e. president will go to Turkey if the border is open or if
we are on the threshold of Armenia’s deblockading.

Turkish FM announced after his discussions with the Foreign Minister
of Bosnia and Herzegovina claiming that soon the regulatory processes
in the region would be set in a stronger wave. "From another point we
signify the disposition of the international society and especially
Armenia’s disposition towards Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict," Turkish
FM stressed.

BAKU: Serzh Sargsyan’s Statement Is Obstacle To Address Our Problems

SERZH SARGSYAN’S STATEMENT IS OBSTACLE TO ADDRESS OUR PROBLEMS: TURKISH MP

Today.Az
38.html
July 30 2009
Azerbaijan

Turkish ruling Justice and Development Party member of parliament
Ruhi Achikgoz spoke in an exclusive interview with Day.Az.

Day.Az: Recently Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan said he will visit
Turkey to watch return match between the two countries’ football
teams only after Ankara opens borders or makes an evident move to
remove Armenia’s blockade. How can you comment on this statement?

Ruhi Achikgoz: I did not closely watch recent events, but I believe
Armenia-Turkey talks and efforts to resolve the Karabakh conflict
are going on. We are trying to establish a political dialogue. Turkey
surely notifies Azerbaijan of this dialogue.

I think Armenian president should try to help us in solving common
problems, because he understands that the fact that the Karabakh
conflict is not resolved hinders Armenia in the eyes of world community
and makes situation of Armenians and complex Armenia-Turkey relations
even worse. These problems must be resolved. I hope that Sargsyan
will contribute to solving these problems. The visit by Mr. Abdullah
Gul to Yerevan, of course, was associated not only with watching a
soccer match. The visit marked the first step to solving all problems,
first of all the Karabakh conflict.

I think it would be more appropriate for Sargsyan to support this
step. Because strong politicians can take a risk on the settlement
of problems.

Q: When Turkish President Abdullah Gul visited Armenia, he did not
make any terms. But Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan does make
terms. Is it a right move?

A: It will not be beneficial for bilateral relations. Sargsyan’s
statement which makes terms is one of the biggest obstacles to solve
problems.

Q: How do you assess current level of Armenia-Turkey relations?

A: I believe the policy pursued by Turkish president and prime minister
is right. Naturally, we constantly keep Armenia-Azerbaijan relations
on agenda. We get familiar with the state of affairs and discuss
it at various meetings with parliamentarians of both countries. We
participate in all initiatives aimed at resolving the problems. But
we certainly do not support a unilateral approach to the case. Turkey
does not want the region where it is located to have problems.

This is confirmed by numerous statements by new Foreign Minister Ahmed
Davudoglu. These challenges also include the Karabakh conflict and the
so-called "Armenian Genocide." Solution of these problems must not
be delayed because it does not benefit societies who are interested
in addressing them.

Q: How do you assess the efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group to resolve
the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict? As you know, two
co-chairs will soon have to leave the group.

A: The main thing is the process. Someone’s leaving the group will
not change anything. The settlement process must not be interrupted. I
think that process will continue regardless of the departure of any of
co-chair. We need to patiently wait for the outcome of the activities
of the Minsk Group. There are long-standing problems that can not
be solved quickly and easily. You need to wait. I think that this
process will continue and activities of the Minsk Group will lead to
positive results.

Q: Once it was widely believed that Turkey could help resolve the
Karabakh conflict within the OSCE Minsk Group. This news prompted
discontent in Armenia…

A: Naturally, an increase in those who contribute to resolving the
conflict always brings benefits. I think that it may be beneficial
to both Azerbaijan and Armenia. It is wrong to believe that the
participation of Turkey in this process will benefit only Azerbaijan.

http://www.today.az/news/politics/542

BAKU: Azerbaijan’s Opposition Parties To Hold Talks On Karabakh Prob

AZERBAIJAN’S OPPOSITION PARTIES TO HOLD TALKS ON KARABAKH PROBLEM

Today.Az
s/54234.html
July 30 2009
Azerbaijan

The Union for Democracy working group on resolution of the Karabakh
problem met in Baku on July 29, chairman of Azadlig party, part of
the union, Ahmad Oruj said.

He said representatives of the working group decided to launch talks
on the Karabakh problem with the political parties.

"The working group opposes the Madrid Principles. Each party will
express views on this issue during the talks. Regardless of results,
we plan to stage a protest action," he said.

Oruj said it is not known yet when the next Karabakh forum will
be held.

The Union for Democracy includes Classic Popular Front Party, Azadlig,
People’s Party of Azerbaijan, Great Azerbaijan and National Democratic
Party of Azerbaijan.

http://www.today.az/news/politic

BAKU: IFC Branches Out In Georgia And Armenia

IFC BRANCHES OUT IN GEORGIA AND ARMENIA

Trend
July 30 2009
Azerbaijan

The International Finance Cooperation (IFC) is branching out to
Georgia and Armenia, IFC Vice-President Jyrki Koskelo said at the
opening ceremony of the IFC office in Tbilisi.

The IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, considers Georgia and
Armenia as its long-term strategic partners and intends to expand
its activities through cooperation with the governments and private
sector of these countries, Koskelo said.

The Corporation intends to continue its advisory programs to reduce
impact of the global economic crisis, to improve the investment sphere
and apply corporate management, Koskela said.

The new office in Tbilisi, will cover Armenia along with Georgia,
Koskela added.

Despite the global financial crisis, the corporation decided to expand
its regional representations. "The new office in Tbilisi will enable
us to be closer to customers in Georgia and Armenia, to maximum use
resources and strengthen cooperation in the region," Koskela added.

President Of Armenia Will Not Accept Imitation

PRESIDENT OF ARMENIA WILL NOT ACCEPT IMITATION

Panorama.am
14:03 30/07/2009

President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan announced yesterday that he would
accept invitation to travel to Turkey only if Ankara started taking
visible steps to deblockade Armenia.

"I will only accept the invitation only if the agreements are observed
and visible steps are taken, i.e. I will go to Turkey if the border
is open or if we are on the threshold of Armenia’s deblockading,"
President said.

In fact President Serzh Sargsyan made similar statement a few months
ago in his interviews given to foreign media on the occasion of him
taking the office. In this respect, we are much interested in what
the need was to repeat the same statement. But there is such need. It
was necessary to make Ankara understand that their activities of
imitating things have been decoded by Armenia; hence Yerevan will not
allow thinking that certain steps have been made and that Armenian
side should give response. Serzh Sargsyan stressed that imitated
activities are unacceptable for him and that they can not be ground
for his visit to Turkey.

It’s worth reminding that a year ago Serzh Sargsyan took exclusive
initiative inviting his Turkish counterpart Abdulah Gul to travel to
Armenia to watch Armenia-Turkey football match. It’s obvious that the
mission of the invitation was to start the process of regulating ties;
the invitation has been accepted by Ankara under the influence of
several objective and subjective elements. Since then the initiative
has been called "football diplomacy".

In the framework of that process Yerevan and Ankara have had various
open and closed-door meetings in the aftermath of which a joint
statement was made in April on "road map" regulating the ties. Though
the content of the document is not published but it’s supposed that
Turkey should deblockade Armenian border without any preconditions
and should also set diplomatic ties with Armenia.

To suppose that if President Sargsyan defined October as the
deadline of implementing the process, then we should expect that the
processes should be implemented before that. But if we consider that
no other issue is defined by the agenda but to open the border and
set diplomatic ties, then the deadline will be defined October when
the football match will be under way.

And is it necessary to worry about Turkey to make imitation? Of course,
we do. To consider official Ankara’s statements it becomes obvious
that they have kept the formal part and have postponed the process
of making statements.

PM Sargsyan Had A Breakfast-Meeting With Serbian President Tadich

PM SARGSYAN HAD A BREAKFAST-MEETING WITH SERBIAN PRESIDENT TADICH

Gov.Am
/
July 30 2009
Armenia

Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan had a breakfast-meeting with President
of the Republic of Serbia Boris Tadich at the venue of his residence
in Yerevan.

A bilateral relationship-related agenda has been discussed. Speaking
about the need for strengthening government-to-government ties,
the parties stressed the importance of direct contacts between
decision-makers and business circles.

Agriculture and the farm produce processing sector were said to be
among the most prospective areas for cooperation. The interlocutors
agreed in that the centuries-old Armenian-Serbian friendship and
boosted cultural exchanges may provide a sound basis for upgrading
relations between the two countries.

The meeting was marked by an atmosphere of warmth and friendship.
From: Baghdasarian

http://www.gov.am/en/news/item/4826

"Chess – 960" Tournament: Aronian Defeats Movsisyan

"CHESS – 960" TOURNAMENT: ARONIAN DEFEATS MOVSISYAN

Panorama.am
11:19 30/07/2009

Armenian GM Levon Aronian who is currently attending "Chess-960"
tournament has been defeated after his three perfect victories. Aronian
lost his set playing with Nakamura and Bologan. In the final round
Aronian managed to defeat Sergey Movsisyan who presents Slovakia in the
tournament. Currently Levon Aronian has four victories and two losses.

Sarkisian Lauds Armenian Army, Warns Azerbaijan

SARKISIAN LAUDS ARMENIAN ARMY, WARNS AZERBAIJAN

ArmenianLiberty.org
http://www.azatuty un.am/content/article/1789227.html
July 30 2009

President Serzh Sarkisian paid tribute to the Armenian Armed Forces
on Thursday, saying, in a thinly veiled warning to Azerbaijan, that
they would successfully fight back any military attack on Armenia
and Nagorno-Karabakh.

"Today we are strong, stronger than ever; our army is solid, modern and
capable of fulfilling any task," Sarkisian told hundreds of graduates
of Armenian military academies. "It has passed with honor the exam
of not only war, but peace as well, embodying the victorious spirit
of all Armenians."

"To those who threaten us with a war, we are reminding the biblical
message: ‘For all they that take the sword shall perish with the
sword,’" he said. "The irrefutable truth of these words has been
proved by the best sons of our nation, the generation of our fathers,
my generation. Let no one doubt that if necessary, the same will
happen today as well."

It was an obvious response to Azerbaijani leaders’ regular threats to
win back Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijani territories surrounding by
force. Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev has repeatedly told his
nation to be prepared to resume hostilities "at any moment."

A native of Karabakh, Sarkisian played a prominent role in the
Armenian-Azerbaijani war of 1991-1994. He commanded Karabakh Armenian
forces before moving to Yerevan and becoming Armenia’s defense minister
in 1993. He also served as defense minister from 2000-2007.

Sarkisian addressed the army college graduates after they solemnly
received their first military ranks and paraded in Yerevan’s main
Republic Square on the occasion. The high-profile ceremony was also
attended by other top government officials and the head of the Armenian
Apostolic Church, Catholicos Garegin II.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Military Planners Confront Conscript Shortfall, Mull An End To Colle

MILITARY PLANNERS CONFRONT CONSCRIPT SHORTFALL, MULL AN END TO COLLEGE EXEMPTION
Gayane Abrahamyan

Eurasia Insight
ticles/eav073009a.shtml
7/30/09

A looming shortfall in conscripts for the Armenian army is forcing
the country to mull tough choices. A fierce debate has erupted over
a plan to remove university enrollment as grounds for an exemption
from military service. The proposal reflects both concern over the
country’s shrinking male population and worries about the growing
military strength of the country’s long-time archrival, Azerbaijan.

Proposed amendments that are expected to be submitted to parliament
this fall would require young men to enroll in the army either
immediately after finishing high school or after finishing
university. Under current legislation covering the draft, male
university students receive a temporary waiver from military service;
that waiver becomes a permanent exemption if they are enrolled in a
doctorate program.

Teachers and other education specialists worry that the changes
could cause serious damage to Armenia’s higher education system. The
Defense Ministry counters that the army needs the manpower. The recent
expansion of Azerbaijan’s military capabilities is injecting a sense
of urgency into the Armenian debate. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive].

Armenia’s demographic situation lies at the heart of the
discussion. Birth rates plummeted during the early 1990s, a period
when the conflict with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh was in its
hot phase, and the Armenian economy experienced turmoil and severe
energy shortages during the jarring transition from central planning
to a market system. Only 39,000 males were born in 1991 — men who
would be eligible to serve in the army as of 2009. That number dropped
to 25,697 by 1995, according to the State Statistical Service. More
than 10 years later, the birth rate has still not improved; roughly
24,000 males were born in 2008, said Karine Kuyumjian, head of the
service’s Demography Department.

Those low numbers will be reflected in the number of Armenian
conscripts starting military service for at least the next decade,
forecasted Kuyumjian.

Although the army’s size is a state secret, the problem is such
that even Deputy Education Minister Ara Avetisian agrees that the
university exemption for military service has to go. "This amendment
is unavoidable because military service is one of the most important
issues for the state," Avetisian commented.

Avetisian favors males entering the army after high school, at the
age of 18, rather than after university. He argues that it would cause
the least disruption to their education. Some experts, however, worry
that young men inducted into the army immediately after either high
school or university would lose interest in ever returning to school.

"Expecting a student who leaves for two years of military service to
return after university to study science or to become a good specialist
after having forgotten everything [he learned] is senseless," said
opposition Heritage Party parliamentarian Anahit Bakhshian, a member
of the parliament’s Committee for Science, Education, Culture, Youth
and Sport. "Neither will boys taken into the army after [high] school
want to study after they get out."

Between the two options, however, Bakhshian, who worked for 30
years as a Yerevan school principal and teacher, also believes
that military service after high school is preferable. "Pupils take
additional classes with private teachers to apply to universities,
so proper conditions need to be created in the army for them to take
the classes there and apply to university after they return and then
study without interruption," Bakhshian said.

Others support the post-high-school option because they believe
that it will help fight corruption in higher education. A 2007
survey carried out by the advocacy group Protection of Students’
Rights found that 30 percent of about 1,000 male students surveyed at
universities nationwide reported that they had only enrolled to avoid
military service. Some 65 percent of that number had paid bribes to
be enrolled in the universities, the survey found.

"Abolishing the waiver will help beat corruption, clean up universities
and have only students who really want to study," commented group
member Anahit Simonian, a sociologist who worked on the survey.

But parliamentarians do not unanimously support the idea of
post-high-school military service. "The army’s effectiveness for combat
can’t be provided by 18-year-old boys," objected Artur Aghabekian,
a member of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation-Dashnaktsutiun who
served as a deputy defense minister from 2000 to 2007. "Our country
really has a demographic problem, but a general draft won’t solve it."

Opposition politicians also object to the proposed law; the time
has come, these critics argue, for Armenia to have a professional
army. "Was it news for them that we have had demographic problems
beginning the ’90s?" fumed Vahan Shirkhanian a member of ex-President
Levon Ter-Petrosian’s Armenian National Congress who served as a
deputy defense minister under Ter-Petrosian from 1995 to 1998. "They
should have thought about creating a professional army long ago."

For the army, going professional raises cost concerns. Maj.-Gen. Kamo
Kuchunts, who oversees the draft, recruitment and the training of
conscripts, termed the idea "important, but . . . highly expensive." He
did not elaborate about projected costs. But he noted that only
"about 8,000 contracts" have been signed since Armenia began in 2005
to enlist army sergeants on contract. Removing the need for military
conscription by building a professional army "needs both serious
resources and a certain amount of time," Kuchunts concluded.

Whether by establishing a professional army or scrapping the university
exemption for military service, time is of the essence, noted political
analyst Igor Muradian. "Especially now, when Azerbaijan has more money
and more resources, we need to find some ways to enlarge the army,"
he said.

Editor’s Note: Gayane Abrahamyan is a reporter for ArmeniaNow.com
in Yerevan.

http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insightb/ar