Pope, Armenian patriarch pray for restored unity

Catholic World News
May 9 2008

Pope, Armenian patriarch pray for restored unity

Vatican, May. 9, 2008 (CWNews.com) – At a midday meeting on May 9 with
the leader of the Armenian Apostolic Church, Pope Benedict XVI (bio –
news) looked forward to Pentecost Sunday and said, "we will pray in a
particular way for the unity of the Church."

The Holy Father was joined by Catholicos Karekin II in an ecumenical
prayer service in the Clementine Hall of the apostolic palace. Karekin
was accompanied by a number of Armenian bishops and a large group of
lay faithful of the Armenian Apostolic Church.

"If our hearts and minds are open to the Spirit of communion, God can
work miracles again in the Church, restoring the bonds of unity," the
Pope said. "Striving for Christian unity is an act of obedient trust
in the work of the Holy Spirit."

Recalling the breakthroughs in ecumenical dialogue with the Armenian
Church over the past several years, the Pope said that the two
churches must pray "that the day will come when our unity in faith
makes possible a common celebration of the Eucharist." The immediate
predecessors of the two Church leaders, Pope John Paul II (bio – news)
and Catholicos Karekin I, signed a theological accord that settled the
major Christological disputes that have divided the churches for 15
centuries. A joint commission is now working toward common agreements
on remaining theological differences.

Catholicos Karekin, during brief remarks that he delivered at the
Pope’s public audience on Wednesday, May 7, had called for a general
recognition of the Armenian genocide. Pope Benedict responded to that
plea during their Friday meeting, and also alluded to the oppression
of religious faith under the Communist regime, noting that "the recent
history of the Armenian Apostolic Church has been written in the
contrasting colors of persecution and martyrdom, darkness and hope,
humiliation and spiritual re-birth."

In more recent years, the Pope continued, "the restoration of freedom
to the Church in Armenia has been a source of great joy for us all."
He praised the leadership of the Armenian patriarchs, under whose
leadership "the glorious light of Christ shines again in Armenia and
the saving words of the Gospel can be heard once more."

Pope Speaks of Immense Task of Rebuilding Church in Armenia

Vatican Radio, The Vatican
May 9 2008

Pope Speaks of Immense Task of Rebuilding Church in Armenia

(09 May 08- RV) Pope Benedict XVI met Friday with Catholicos Karekin,
Patriarch of All Armenia.

The two men met ahead of an ecumenical service, presided over by Pope
Benedict which saw the participation of members of the Armenian Church
travelling with the Patriarch.

During the ceremony held in the Clementine hall of the Apostolic
Palace, Pope Benedict XVI delivered the following discourse:

Your Holiness,
Dear Brothers in Christ,

It is with heartfelt joy that I welcome Your Holiness, and the
distinguished delegation accompanying you. I cordially greet the
prelates, priests and lay-people who represent the worldwide family of
the Catholicosate of All Armenians. We come together in the name of
our Lord Jesus Christ, who promised his disciples that `where two or
three are gathered in my name, I am there among them’ (Mt 18:20). May
the spirit of brotherly love and service, which Jesus taught to his
disciples, enlighten our hearts and minds, as we exchange our
greetings, hold our conversations and gather in prayer.

I gratefully recall the visits of Catholicos Vasken I and Catholicos
Karekin I to the Church of Rome, and their cordial relations with my
venerable predecessors Pope Paul VI and Pope John Paul II. Their
striving for Christian unity opened a new era in relations between
us. I recall with particular joy Your Holiness’ visit to Rome in 2000
and your meeting with Pope John Paul II. The ecumenical liturgy in the
Vatican Basilica, celebrating the gift of a relic of Saint Gregory the
Illuminator, was one of the most memorable events of the Great Jubilee
in Rome. Pope John Paul II returned that visit by travelling to
Armenia in 2001, where You graciously hosted him at Holy
Etchmiadzin. The warm welcome you gave him on that occasion further
increased his esteem and respect for the Armenian people. The
Eucharist celebrated by Pope John Paul II on the great outdoor altar,
within the enclosure of Holy Etchmiadzin, was a further sign of
growing mutual acceptance, in expectation of the day when we will be
able to celebrate together at the one table of the Lord.

Tomorrow evening, each of us, in our respective traditions, will begin
the liturgical celebration of Pentecost. Fifty days after the
Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, we will pray earnestly to the
Father, asking him to send his Holy Spirit, the Spirit whose task it
is to maintain us in divine love and lead us into all truth. We will
pray in a particular way for the unity of the Church. On Pentecost
day, it was the Holy Spirit who created from the many languages of the
crowds assembled in Jerusalem one single voice to profess the
faith. It is the Holy Spirit who brings about the Church’s unity. The
path towards the restoration of full and visible communion among all
Christians may seem long and arduous. Much remains to be done to heal
the deep and painful divisions that disfigure Christ’s Body. The Holy
Spirit, however, continues to guide the Church in surprising and often
unexpected ways. He can open doors that are locked, inspire words that
have been forgotten, heal relations that are broken. If our hearts and
minds are open to the Spirit of communion, God can work miracles again
in the Church, restoring the bonds of unity. Striving for Christian
unity is an act of obedient trust in the work of the Holy Spirit, who
leads the Church to the full realization of the Father’s plan, in
conformity with the will of Christ.

The recent history of the Armenian Apostolic Church has been written
in the contrasting colours of persecution and martyrdom, darkness and
hope, humiliation and spiritual re-birth. Your Holiness and the
members of your delegation have personally lived through these
contrasting experiences in your families and in your own lives. The
restoration of freedom to the Church in Armenia has been a source of
great joy for us all. An immense task of rebuilding the Church has
been laid on your shoulders. I cannot but voice my great esteem for
the remarkable pastoral results that have been achieved in such a
short time, both in Armenia and abroad, for the Christian education of
young people, for the training of new clergy, for building new
churches and community centres, for charitable assistance to those in
need, and for promoting Christian values in social and cultural
life. Thanks to your pastoral leadership, the glorious light of Christ
shines again in Armenia and the saving words of the Gospel can be
heard once more. Of course, you are still facing many challenges on
the social, cultural and spiritual levels. In this regard, I must
mention the recent difficulties suffered by the people of Armenia, and
I express the prayerful support of the Catholic Church in their search
for justice and peace and the promotion of the common good.

In our ecumenical dialogue, important progress has been made in
clarifying the doctrinal controversies that have traditionally divided
us, particularly over questions of Christology. During the last five
years, much has been achieved by the Joint Commission for Theological
Dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Oriental Orthodox
Churches, of which the Catholicosate of All Armenians is a full
member. I thank Your Holiness for the support given to the work of the
Joint Commission and for the valuable contribution made by your
representatives. We pray that its activity will bring us closer to
full and visible communion, and that the day will come when our unity
in faith makes possible a common celebration of the Eucharist. Until
that day, the bonds between us are best consolidated and extended by
agreements on pastoral issues, in line with the degree of doctrinal
agreement already attained. Only when sustained by prayer and
supported by effective cooperation, can theological dialogue lead to
the unity that the Lord wishes for his disciples.

Your Holiness, dear friends: in the twelfth century, Nerses of Lambron
addressed a group of Armenian Bishops. He concluded his famous Synodal
Discourse on the restoration of Christian unity with visionary words,
that still affect us today: `You are not wrong, Venerable Fathers: it
is meritorious to weep over days past in discord. However, today is
the day that the Lord has made, a day of gladness and joy (¦) Let
us then pray in order that our Lord give tenderness, sweetness in
greater abundance still, and that He develop on earth, by the dew of
the Holy Spirit, this seed; perhaps, thanks to His power may we also
produce fruits; so that we may restore the peace of the Church of
Christ today in intention, tomorrow in fact’. This is also my
prayerful wish on the occasion of your visit. I thank you most warmly
and assure you of my deep affection in the Lord.

rticolo.asp?c4385

http://www.oecumene.radiovaticana.org/en1/A

A birthday celebration that lost sight of Israel’s complex history

North by Northwestern, IL
May 9 2008

A birthday celebration that lost sight of Israel’s complex history

By Lana Birbrair

`What is Israel?’ Elie Wiesel asked the packed crowd in Welsh-Ryan
Arena. `It is, to all of us, a question mark.’ He was referring to
Israel’s timeline, not poking at the inner workings of the country’s
existential crisis. But the issue that Wiesel inadvertently raised is
the one that Jews should have been asking, yet were not, at the
Thursday night celebration of the country’s founding.

Wiesel ‘ a Holocaust survivor, Nobel Peace Prize winner, activist, and
author of more than 40 books, most famously Night ‘ was the
highlighted speaker at the Israel @ 60 Gala, a sold-out commemoration
of Israel’s independence. I and about 8,000 other people attended the
event, which included music and speakers, including Wiesel, comedian
Jeff Garlin and Barukh Binah, Consul General of Israel to the Midwest.

The audience included prominent Illinois and Chicago politicians, as
well as representatives and consul-generals from 20 nations, ranging
from Bolivia to Jordan to Australia. Most received enthusiastic
applause ‘ except France and Germany, which were met with claps and
boos. The event’s tone was congratulatory and hopeful, a celebration
of Israel’s 60-year history as a nation and its longer history as a
Jewish land.

Despite the hopeful overtones, many of the speakers’ messages were
clearly political. Barukh Binah, in his opening remarks, praised
Israel’s achievements in the arts and sciences. `I promise you today:
We will never cease to astonish the world,’ he said.

Nevertheless, he warned that those accomplishments would not come
without a price. `I humbly suggest to you that Israel is unique in
just about everything, but it is most unique in that it is a country
that must still be fought for. We may take Israel for granted, but
unfortunately, some of her neighbors do not.’ And when Wiesel called
for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, one of the most outspoken
Holocaust deniers, to be thrown out of the United Nations, he was met
with enthusiastic applause.

Optimism is to be expected at the birthday celebration of a nation
that many fought so hard for. But the steady self-assurance troubled
me slightly. In a video celebrating four Chicagoans who fought for
Israel, one man, who was in the audience, spoke about learning to
throw Molotov cocktails at tanks, and how it was the most exciting
time in his life. And when the audience stood to clap for him, it did
not seem to recognize that the tanks he destroyed were filled with
people trying to regain the land that had been taken away from them.

I do not mean to make a political statement about Israel one way or
the other ‘ enough has already been said about the injustices and
cruelties committed on both sides of the debate. But when Wiesel
proudly stated, `Israel rejected hatred as a principle. Anger,
sometimes, but hatred is on the other side,’ I felt a stirring in my
stomach that was not of pride, but of shame. If, 60 years later, young
Americans can boo when Germany is mentioned as a supporter, but cheer
for Turkey, which still denies the Armenian genocide, then perhaps
hatred has not been rejected by all.

The creation of Israel was a major, long-fought-for accomplishment for
the Jewish people, and I do not begrudge a celebration by a people
whose history is full of such hardship and overwhelming
resilience. But when, even at this occasion, that pride threatens to
turn to arrogance, when that celebration loses sight of the
complexities and contradictions that fill the history of Israel’s
formation, we Jews momentarily lose sight of the reality of our
position. We must keep in mind that although Israel came at a large
price, that price was not paid only by Jews.

But in the end, I do say `we.’ Because sitting in that audience,
surrounded by people who look like me and share my past, there was no
question that I was a Jew. In the middle of an audience dotted heavily
with yarmulkes, waving white-and-blue glow sticks, and singing along
to the Israeli national anthem, Wiesel’s words struck me: `We shall
never speak of Israel as `them,’ but as we ‘ for after all, we are one
people.’

008/05/10046/israel-at-60/

http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2

Kathleen Chalfant, ‘Red Dog Howls,’ tackle the Armenian genocide

Los Angeles Times, CA
May 8 2008

Kathleen Chalfant, ‘Red Dog Howls,’ tackle the Armenian genocide

The veteran actress plays a 91-year-old survivor in the play.

By Patrick Pacheco, Special to The Times
May 11, 2008
New York

KATHLEEN Chalfant is recalling the first time she rented the British
actress Miriam Margolyes’ house in Tuscany, now an annual summer
ritual for the Chalfant family. "Let’s see, it was 10 years ago, just
after my brother’s death," she says, digging into a plate of crab
salad. "It will be 10 years. . . ." She pauses. "Oh, my God, that’s
today."

Just the barest flicker of emotion crosses over the 63-year-old
actress’ luminous blue eyes, even though Chalfant was close to her
brother, Alan Palmer, a San Francisco restaurateur and political
fundraiser. Her moving astringency is typical of the emotional
discipline she has brought to myriad great performances, including her
turns — rabbi, Mormon mother, Ethel Rosenberg — in Tony Kushner’s
"Angels in America" (for which she received a Tony nomination); her
Vivian Bearing, the acerbic John Donne scholar dying of cancer in
Margaret Edson’s "Wit"; and, more recently, her imperious matriarch in
Sarah Ruhl’s "Dead Man’s Cell Phone."

Now Chalfant is applying that extraordinary rigor in a new play, "Red
Dog Howls," in the role of Rose Afratian, a fierce and haunted
91-year-old survivor of the massacres of Armenians that began in
1915. Red Dog HowlsThe memory play by Alexander Dinelaris examines the
legacy of violence and its effect on Rose’s young grandson,
Michael. On the cusp of beginning his own family and while going
through his dead father’s personal effects, Michael discovers letters
that lead to a grandmother he’s never known, uncovering terrible
wounds for both. The play opens Wednesday at the El Portal Theatre in
North Hollywood.

"Kathleen is one of the few great actresses of the stage who can
handle stern comedy and enormous gravitas," Dinelaris says. "The
character may be 91, but the audience has to believe she could live
another 30 years. Kathleen conveys the age as well the strength of a
much younger woman."

Indeed, in the rehearsal that preceded lunch, under the watch of
director Michael Peretzian, Chalfant sparred with Matthew Rauch,
playing Michael, in a scene that alternated between Rose’s dry humor
and the tension of two strangers assessing the dangers and
opportunities of a first encounter. Yet for all of Chalfant’s cerebral
cool, what one notices is an earthly sensuality — traces of the
independent child of the ’60s she once was.

"It is a surprise," acknowledges Dinelaris. "But it’s there in the way
she moves, in the kind of visceral attachment she has toward food and
in the softness she has toward family."

All of which fits well into Rose, who in the course of the play not
only lets her grandson in on searing family secrets but also
challenges him to arm-wrestling (which she wins) and continually
badgers him to eat. The latter is of a piece with the Armenian
matriarch whom Chalfant played off-Broadway in Leslie Ayvazian’s "Nine
Armenians." But that domestic play shares little with the strong
echoes of Greek tragedy in "Red Dog Howls" — something that attracted
Chalfant, who majored in the classics at Stanford.

"The central issue for a lot of my work is that violence is
irredeemable, that it does great harm to both the perpetrator and the
victim," she says. For the ancient Greeks, that violence was most
often the result of a curse placed on a family because of some
horrendous misdeed. And although Chalfant says she admires "the
practicality, realism and irony" of the Greek philosophical worldview
— "This is just the way of the world" — she is much more a child of
the enlightenment.

"I believe in the redemptive power of reason," says Chalfant. "I don’t
believe in curses. Whatever curses there are, it is in the
psychological burdens which a parent may place on one’s
children. These things can be redeemed or stopped; I don’t think it’s
necessary for children to suffer from the same lunacy as their
parents."

Parents’ part

CHALFANT’S parents — William Bishop and Norah Ford — deeded to their
daughter a bifurcated vision of the world.

"My father was fierce, dark and misanthropic," recalls Chalfant of the
man who had been in the military and then later ran boarding houses
with his wife. "My mother was the bridge to the outer world —
beautiful, charming, funny, highly tolerant and very strong. It never
occurred to me that men and women weren’t equal. But both my mother
and her mother, Nelly, who was married five times, tempered that
strength by being very sexy."

Chalfant says that she learned everything she knows about acting by
carefully observing the colorful polyglot inhabiting her parents’
businesses, first a motel in Sacramento and then a 50-room boarding
house in East Oakland. She grew up there with her parents, paternal
grandfather and maternal grandmother, who often took her to the
movies. She was weaned on 1950s melodramas, like Rita Hayworth in
"Miss Sadie Thompson." But Chalfant says she was drawn to westerns. If
there was any childhood impulse to become an actress, it came from
fantasizing about one thing: to be kissed by a cowboy.

Much to her surprise, at 17, she had her first kiss in the music room
of the boarding house — from John Miller, "a Keith Carradine
look-alike and intellectual" who eschewed acting as superficial and
encouraged Chalfant to study ancient Greek language and culture. Three
years later, she broke Miller’s heart after she met Henry Chalfant, a
painter, and ran off to Mexico with him. They married in 1966 and went
to live in Europe, first in Barcelona, where their son David, now a
musician and record producer, was born. They then moved to Rome, where
Kathleen studied acting. "I remember when we were driving back from
Mexico, I told Henry, ‘I don’t want to be stuck teaching Greek to prep
school students.’ He said, ‘What do you want to do?’ Out of the blue,
I said, ‘I want to be an actress.’ "

Her start in acting

THE COUPLE returned from Rome to the U.S. in 1971, settling in
Woodstock, N.Y., where Henry ultimately became a photographer and
documentary filmmaker. After giving birth to a daughter, Andromache
(now a set designer), Chalfant and her husband moved to New York City,
where she began a career off-off-Broadway that would be distinguished
for its sheer breadth and versatility. The actress appeared in plays
by the likes of Jules Feiffer, Christopher Durang, Maria Irene Fornés
and Samuel Beckett before making her Broadway debut in 1975 in Greg
Antonacci’s "Dance With Me." "I just wanted work, and I wanted
challenges," she said. "Yes, a lot of my work has been political, but
it’s been mostly due to good luck."

That would include getting cast early on in the development of
Kushner’s "Angels in America" and landing the role of Bearing in "Wit"
(seen at the Geffen Playhouse in 2000). In the years between the
projects, however, Chalfant was beset with a "paralyzing" fear of
acting. "I’m not sure what caused it, but I was lucky to have a very
good therapist who gave me some good advice: Don’t think about
it. And, miraculously, it worked."

She admits, with a sheepish smile, that it might well have been
physiological. "I think since then I’ve been a much braver actress,"
she says. "Only in the last couple of years, since ‘Wit,’ has it
really dawned on me that I have some skills. Now it’s fun!"

It’s ironic that "Wit," a brutally poetic play about a woman
confronting death only with the salve of her beloved John Donne,
should be Chalfant’s life raft. "Who could have known that play about
a naked, bald woman in her 50s would have had such an impact?" she
says. While she was reaching what is arguably the pinnacle of her
career with "Wit," her brother Alan, who had since moved in with the
Chalfant family, was dying of cancer.

Asked if playing in "Wit," with its unsentimental yet clarifying view
of death, was a comfort at the time, Chalfant says, "What I came to
understand was death as a particular stage of life, a mysterious
progression in the life of all beings, not a very long one. I don’t
know what came before, and I don’t know what will come after. Frankly,
I’m more concerned with the here and now and making this life a little
better than how I found it."

After spending time plumbing the tragedy of the Armenian genocide in
"Red Dog Howls," Chalfant is looking forward to Tuscany.

"There is a beautiful loggia looking over an olive grove where we take
a lot of our meals," she says, brimming with anticipation. "Alan’s
ashes are buried there; we always remember to splash his grave with a
good Brunello."

Kirk Kerkorian to acquire 20 million shares in Ford

Pravda, Russia
May 9 2008

Kirk Kerkorian to acquire 20 million shares in Ford

Kirk Kerkorian, an Armenian-American billionaire, and CEO of Tracinda
Corporation, has made a cash tender offer to acquire 20 million shares
in Ford.

Tracinda Corporation currently owns 100 million shares, or about 4.7
percent of Ford’s stock and the new acquisition will raise the amount
up to 5.6 percent.

Tracinda most recently made headlines by offering $4.5 billion to buy
Chrysler on April 5, 2007, causing the shares of DaimlerChrysler to
soar 5.3%. However many have speculated that the dollar value of the
bid is inadequate for DaimlerChrysler to accept. Interestingly,
Kerkorian also bid in 1995 to take over Chrysler, unsuccessfully. The
deal fell apart after Kerkorian and Tracinda were largely locked out
of financing for their offer after heavy lobbying by Chrysler against
the bid on Wall Street.

Having no intent to gain control over Ford, Tracinda left open the
possibility of acquiring more shares.

The tender offer is due to expire on June 9. Currently Ford takes no
actions setting aside the review of the case till the end of this
month.

Pete Peters to receive honorary doctorate

US Fed News
May 8, 2008 Thursday 12:13 AM EST

PETE PETERS TO RECEIVE HONORARY DOCTORATE

FRESNO, Calif.

California State University Fresno issued the following press release:

The California State University and California State University,
Fresno will confer an honorary doctoral degree – the CSU’s highest
commendation – on Fresno businessman and philanthropist Pete P. Peters
at Fresno State’s Commencement on May 17.

For his unwavering commitment to bettering the region, Peters will
receive the honorary degree of Doctor of Humane Letters.

"Pete P. Peters is one of the great visionaries of Central
California," said Fresno State President John D. Welty, who nominated
Peters. "At Fresno State and elsewhere, Mr. Peters has helped our
region in many ways.

"He has provided guidance on a range of issues through active board
membership, donations for building programs that have inspired others
to give and scholarships in a number of disciplines that have launched
our graduates into careers of service in the region and elsewhere,"
Welty said.

The youngest son of Armenian immigrants, Peters longed to attend
college.

Instead, he and his brother, Leon S. Peters, worked hard and gained
reputations as honest businessmen who were generous community
benefactors.

Pete P. Peters joined Valley Foundry and Machine Works in 1939,
shortly after his brother bought the business, which manufactured wine
grape crushers. During World War II, however, the business made ship
winches and valves for the armed forces. The business returned to
winemaking equipment in peacetime.

Valley Foundry was sold to Ametek (NYSE: AME), where Peters continued
his career as vice president.

The Peters brothers decided to share the gains of their success with
the region through charitable foundations. The Pete P. Peters
Foundation is guided by the words of Peters’ father: "Give back to the
community." Leon S.

Peters was posthumously awarded the honorary degree of Doctor of
Humane Letters by the CSU and Fresno State in 1997.

Pete Peters believes quality education and health care are integral
components of a great community. The Peters families were major donors
to Fresno-based Community Medical Centers and to Fresno State.

Many other organizations have been touched by Peters’ generosity,
including the San Joaquin River Parkway and Conservation Trust, Valley
Public Television, the San Joaquin College of Law and the Boys and
Girls Club.

Since the early 1980s, the foundation has provided numerous gifts to
Fresno State through the Pete P. Peters Nursing, Business and
Viticulture scholarships and the Pete P. Peters Endowment in Armenian
Studies.

Peters also supports the President’s Fund, Ag One Foundation, the
Henry Madden Library, the Bulldog Foundation, the Leon S. Peters
Honors Scholars and the Business Associates Program.

After Leon Peters died, his brother continued the family’s giving
legacy. In 1999, the Leon S. Peters and Pete P. Peters foundations
provided the first private gift of $1.2 million to the Save Mart
Center capital campaign. This gift created the Leon S. and Pete
P. Peters Educational Center, a 300-seat classroom auditorium within
the Student Recreation Center adjacent to the Save Mart Center.

Rep. Costa calls on new nominee to answer questions on Armenian Geno

States News Service
May 8, 2008 Thursday

REP. COSTA CALLS ON NEW NOMINEE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON ARMENIAN
GENOCIDE

WASHINGTON

The following information was released by the office of California
Rep. Jim Costa:

Today, Congressman Jim Costa (D-Fresno) sent a letter to Ambassador
Marie L. Yovanovich, the new nominee to be the United States
Ambassador to the Republic of Armenia. Costa asked Ambassador
Yovanovich to answer questions about her feelings on the events that
happened in Turkey between 1915 and 1923.

"It is important that the United States fill this empty diplomatic
position in Yerevan, Armenia," said Costa. "But before she is
confirmed by the United States Senate, it is critical for my
constituents and me to know her thoughts on the first genocide of the
20th century: the Armenian Genocide."

Ambassador Marie L. Yovanovitch of Connecticut, is a Career Member of
the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Counselor, and was nominated on
June 3, 2005 to serve as the next Ambassador Extraordinary and
Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Kyrgyz
Republic. She was confirmed by the United States Senate on June 30,
2005.

The text of Costa’s letter is below.

The Honorable Marie L. Yovanovich

Ambassador to the Kyrgyz Republic

2201 "C" Street, NW

Washington, DC 20520

Dear Ambassador Yovanovich:

Congratulations on your recent nomination to be our Ambassador to the
Republic of Armenia. Your experience and current service as Ambassador
to the Kyrgyz Republic makes you an ideal candidate to serve in
Armenia.

As you are well aware, the United States has not had an Ambassador in
Yerevan since former Ambassador John M. Evans correctly stated the
slaughter of 1.5 million Armenians between 1915 and 1923 was the first
acknowledged genocide of the 20th century. I believe it is in the best
interest of our nation to have this position filled, but it is also
important that my constituents know your views of the Armenian
Genocide, as this issue can strengthen or hurt our relationship with
the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian-American community.

It is, by any reasonable standard, established history that between
1915 and 1923 the Ottoman Empire systematically killed an estimated
1.5 million Armenians and drove hundreds of thousands of others into
exile from their ancestral homeland. The record of this atrocity is
well documented in the United States Archives and has been universally
accepted in the International Association of Genocide Scholars and the
broader historical and academic communities.

Two days after the Ottoman Empire launched the genocide, the New York
Times reported a story with the headline "Kurds Massacre More
Armenians", and followed up this story for the next year with reports
of the mass slaughter occurring in the Ottoman Empire. On October 4th,
1915, the Times ran a front page article about a report from the
Committee on Armenian Atrocities discussing exactly what was happening
to Armenians in Turkey. "The report tells of children under 15 years
of age thrown into the Euphrates to be drowned; of women forced to
desert infants in arms and to leave them by the roadside to die; of
young women and girls appropriated by the Turks, thrown into harems,
attacked, or else sold to the highest bidder, and of men murdered and
tortured."

My district is home to many of Armenian-Americans, and many want to
know your views on the Armenian Genocide. I would like you to respond
to the questions below so I can get an insight on your opinion of the
Armenian Genocide and how you plan to resolve this ongoing issue
between Turkey and Armenia.

1. Under the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the
Crime of Genocide, which the U.S. is a party, it was decided that
genocide occurs when three criteria are met. In your view, does the
killing and exile of 1.5 million Armenians meet these criteria? If it
does not, please explain why it does not.

2. On March 15, 2007, Assistant Secretary of State for European and
Eurasian Affairs Daniel Fried testified before the House Foreign
Affairs Committee and stated that the question of the Armenian
Genocide "should be resolved not by politicians, but through heartfelt
introspection by historians, philosophers, and common people."
However, in 1998, a group of 150 scholars of history, theology and law
encouraged their governments to officially recognize the Armenian
Genocide as such. Is this the type of "heartfelt introspection" from
"historians, philosophers, and common people" that Secretary Fried
spoke of? If so, why has the United States not recognized the Armenian
Genocide? If it does not, please explain why.

3. Have you done any personal research on the Armenian Genocide? If
so, what is your personal opinion about the events that occurred
between 1915 and 1923?

4. What is your plan to strengthen ties with the Armenian-American
community?

5. Is there a plan to bring Turkey to the table and discuss with them
the facts of the Armenian Genocide?

A United States ambassador to a foreign nation has to clearly know and
understand the pulse, feeling and thoughts of those nations’ citizens
to effectively design a diplomatic program while they are working
there. For example, an ambassador to Cambodia would need to
acknowledge their genocide because it has shaped the psychology of
that nation today. It has shaped the way the citizens of Cambodia look
at world events, political threats, cooperation with other nations,
and trade policies. The same is true for Israel or Rwanda. Denying a
traumatic event such as genocide, one cannot create, nor implement,
honest and effective diplomacy, nor gain the trust of that nation in
conducting bilateral relations.

Thank you for your time. I look forward to your quick reply.

Sincerely,

JIM COSTA

A case of Muslim deviance?

The Statesman (India)
May 9, 2008 Friday

A CASE OF MUSLIM DEVIANCE?

Once again the CIA and MI6 are publishing dire warnings of the
vitality of Al Qaida. Once again the Islamic world as a whole is being
tarnished by association. US presidential contender John McCain is
saying that America needs a leadership to confront the transcendent
challenge of our time: the threat of radical Islamic terrorism. And
the words still ring in our ears from Mr Samuel Huntingtons treatise,
The Clash of Civiliza-tions, which in many ways triggered this
paranoia that infects the politicians, the press and the public
discourse. The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic
fundamentalism, IT IS ISLAM, he wrote.

Few, if any, in the Western leadership seem to make the point that Al
Qaida is a deviant phenomenon within the Islamic world, just as
Hit-ler was a deviant phenomenon within the Christian world
(commentators seem to overlook Hitlers early speeches calling on
Catholic principles). But Islam has a much better record over the ages
(despite its founder being far more warlike than the founder of
Christianity) of dealing with its deviants who take violence to
excess. Islamic culture has never been tolerant of Nazism, fascism or
communism. Christian-ity has spawned all three. Buddhism failed to
resist Japanese militarism and Confucianism proved hospitable to
Maoism. Yes, there was Saddam Hussein, but he was an atheistic brute
without an ideology.

Of course, there have been many incidents in the long history of Islam
when there have been large-scale losses of life. The massacres and
starvation of the Armenians in 1915 still stirs the waters of
contemporary debate. But Islam has never spawned anything comparable
with Hitlers systematic genocide of the Jews ~ in-deed throughout its
history Islam has been protective of the Jews, regarding them as
people of the book to whom it had a special responsibility. Nor has it
settled other parts of the world and systematically obliterated other
civilizations, as did Christian Spain with the Aztecs and Incas. Nor
have Islamic societies created anything equivalent to South Africas
apartheid or the racist culture of the old American South. Unlike many
Christian churches, the mosque has never separated people by
race. Even today Americans confess that nowhere is there more
segregation in their society than at the Sunday noon hour.

Western memories are highly selective. When at Easter time the Greek
peasants of the Pelo-ponnese began to kill all the Muslims in the land
there was silence. But 50 years later when there were mass killings of
Christians in Bul-garia there was a great outpouring of moral
outrage. Delacroix immortalised the massacre in his painting, Massacre
of Chaos, with Chris-tian women pursued by Turkish lancers and the
19th century Liberal British Prime Minister William Gladstone wrote a
bestselling pamphlet in which he described the Ottomans as leaving a
broad line of blood marking the track behind them, and as far as their
domination reached civilization vanished from view.

Almost forgotten today is that it was the Otto-mans who gave refuge to
the Jews when they were expelled from Iberia, as were fleeing Ger-man,
French and Czech Protestants, but every cultivated Westerner knows
Voltaires Fanati-cism or Mohammed the Prophet or Dantes portrayal of
Mohammed in hell.

Christianity has always been led or dominated by people of European
descent. But the leadership of the Muslim world has been much more
fragmented ~ between 661 AD and 750 AD it was the Arab Umayyad
dynasty. Between 750 and 1258 it was the multi-ethnic Abbasid
dynasty. And from 1453 to 1922, the Turkish-dominated Ottoman
Empire. In India there was the separate Mughals and in Persia the
Safa-vids. In sub-Saharan Africa there were the Mus-lim empires of
Mali and Songhai.

Despite their relative poverty today, with great teaming cities like
Cairo, Dhaka and Jak-arta, criminal violence is much, much lower than
in Christian-influenced societies. Muslim countries, according to the
UNs annual human development report, have the worlds lowest murder and
rape rates.

In Teheran, the capital of Iran and according to the CIA the most
important single source of terrorism today, you can go out at 11 or 12
at night and find families with children picnicking in city
parks. When my daughters friends ask me where they can safely travel
alone in an interesting Third World city I say Cairo. Certainly not
Catholic Rio or Protestant Cape Town. Not only are murders and
muggings comparatively rarer, there is much less prostitution and hard
drug use. Neither is there that much of AIDS.

The Western debate about Islam is frankly infantile. Even Mr Barack
Obama, the Demo-cratic presidential candidate, is either ignorant or
scared of going into battle on these issues. I have not read one
speech by one Western poli-tician who seriously attempts to educate
public opinion. We live in a slough of ignorance.

Armenian dentist works to be hygienist in U.S.

The Roanoke Times (Virginia)
May 9, 2008 Friday

Armenian dentist works to be hygienist in U.S.: Armen Grigoryan will
graduate today from Virginia Western Community College.

by David Harrison, The Roanoke Times, Va.

May 9–Armen Grigoryan is looking forward to finally working on teeth
again.

Eight years after moving to the United States, Grigoryan, a dentist
from Armenia, will graduate today with an associate degree in dental
hygiene from Virginia Western Community College. He is one of 16 newly
minted dental hygienists and one of roughly 600 students who will
graduate from the school.

"I’ve been around dentistry all my life," said Grigoryan, whose mother
also is a dentist. "When it came time to make a decision and do
something, I knew I was going to be a dentist."

After getting a dentistry degree in Armenia, Grigoryan practiced for a
few years before moving to the United States. He settled briefly in
Los Angeles before moving to Roanoke.

But his foreign degree and his work experience are not recognized in
this country. If Grigoryan wanted to be a dentist here, he would have
had to start dental school again. Instead, he worked in retail until
enrolling in Virginia Western’s dental hygiene program.

As a dental hygienist, Grigoryan will perform duties such as teeth
cleaning, exams and X-rays. He still can’t work as a dentist but, to
him, being a dental hygienist is good enough for now.

"Since I was a little child, I was fascinated by all the tools and all
that stuff," he said.

His mother tried to dissuade him from a career in dentistry, noting
that the job is hard on a dentist’s spine and eyes, but Grigoryan
wouldn’t budge.

Although he’s already been trained as a dentist, Grigoryan still found
the Virginia Western program "very intense." "And it should be because
when people go to the hygienist they want to know that this person is
trained to do it," he added.

The program’s head, Marty Roberson, described Grigoryan as an "ideal
student," one who never trumpeted his previous dental experience.

"He came in with a wide-open mind and said, ‘I’m a sponge and I want
to learn,’ " she said.

Part of the training involved working on patients who signed up for
free dental cleanings and exams through the college. The students see
their patients in an exam room in the school’s Anderson Hall, where 10
dentists’ chairs are arranged in a half-circle.

"Armen is really good at explaining things to patients in his chair,"
she added. "He gets great compliance."

For his part, Grigoryan said he was a little rusty after eight years
away from teeth. But he was able to shake off the rust easily.

"It’s like riding a bicycle," he said. You don’t forget.

Now that he’s done with school, Grigoryan is looking for a job as a
dental hygienist in Roanoke. He said he wasn’t sure whether he wanted
to go back to dental school.

Roberson, however, didn’t hesitate.

"I do hope Armen does go back and gets his dentist’s license because I
think he would be an excellent contribution to the profession."

Real victories and faltering diplomacy

Real victories and faltering diplomacy

09-05-2008 11:32:57 – KarabakhOpen

`The leader of the Democratic Party of Armenia Aram Sargsyan is
dissatisfied with the statements of the foreign ministry of Armenia on
holding a plebiscite on the status of Karabakh. He thinks by similar
statements Armenia questions the legitimacy of all the acts since 1988
which enabled the foundation of the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh, just
like the fact of legitimacy of the state.’ The citation is from
information about the briefing of Armen Sargsyan.

This citation clearly reveals the main political controversy without
overcoming which the settlement of the Karabakh issue is impossible.
More exactly, it is possible but not in favor of the Armenian side. To
put it more clearly, the controversy is the lack of harmony in the
political steps of the Armenian side and the existing reality.

This disharmony of political ambitions and the reality is observed in
many countries. However, as a rule, this inconsistency is biased for
ambitions ` the societies which have no potential and force attack on
the diplomatic front at random, hoping for good luck. And they are
often lucky. Our case is the opposite ` on the diplomatic front we
question our real victories.

We have declared and built a state but another country negotiates
instead of us. We elect our government but they do not even try to take
a seat at the table of talks. We gained advantage in the unequal war
and now we are negotiating for disadvantage. What is more, we are
negotiating with the foe which does not stop threatening us. We even
agree to discuss with it the issue of declaring independence once
again, if they allow us, of course. In addition, not within the present
borders but the borders of the non-existent autonomous republic of the
non-existent country.

What does this stem from? Lack of self-confidence, complex of
geopolitical inferiority, or failure to understand of the rules of this
world which turns out to be based on the right of power rather than the
power of right. In any way, such attitude to our own strength and
interests gives birth to disrespect rather than respect.

The recurrent celebration of the day of liberation of Shushi led to
such judgments. The great victory which brought real security to
thousands of people is still being questioned. During the first meeting
with his Armenian counterpart the minister of foreign affairs of
Azerbaijan again says it is necessary to `withdraw the Armenian force,
return the refugees and create conditions for coexistence of Armenians
and Azerbaijanis in the framework of territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan.’ And we continue to negotiate. We continue to pull down
buildings in Shushi and do not build new ones. We continue¦