Major Jewish group recognizes Armenian genocide The Anti-Defamation League
declines, however, to back a congressional resolution to do the same. The
decisions spark impassioned reactions.
By Teresa Watanabe
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 23, 2007
Reversing long-standing policy, a major American Jewish organization has
officially recognized the early 20th century massacre of Armenians by
Ottoman Turks as genocide — but set off a new furor Wednesday by declining
to support a congressional resolution that would do the same.
Anti-Defamation League national director Abraham Foxman called the massacre
"tantamount to genocide" in a statement this week, rebuffing Turkish claims
that the bloodshed was not ethnic cleansing but casualties suffered by both
sides in a civil war.
He added, however, that a congressional resolution to recognize the genocide
would be a "counterproductive diversion" that could jeopardize Turkish Jews
and relations among Turkey, Israel and the U.S.
Foxman’s statements set off a firestorm of reactions, including anger and
disappointment among Southern California’s Turkish and Armenian American
communities.
They also prompted a telephone powwow Wednesday among major American Jewish
organizations to discuss whether to forge a united position on the issue.
" ‘Furious’ is an understatement" to describe Turkish American reactions,
said Ergun Kirlikovali, West Coast regional director for the Assembly of
Turkish American Associations. "We’re disappointed the ADL has caved in to
Armenian pressure and that history in America is being written by lobbyists,
not facts."
But Armenian American organizations were not satisfied either.
"We welcome any organization that recognizes the genocide, but opposing the
resolution is disappointing and illogical," said Andrew Kzirian of the
Armenian National Committee Western Region.
Father Vazken Movsesian, an Armenian American priest in Glendale who is
active on the genocide issue, was blunter. Foxman’s dual stand "makes it
very clear that his organization is not pursuing justice, but playing the
usual political games," he said. "You would think that a group who has known
the horrors of a Holocaust would be the first one to unequivocally stand up
for the rights of others who have suffered the same."
The issue exploded this week after Foxman fired the executive director of
the group’s Boston office for criticizing the ADL chief’s failure to
recognize the Armenian genocide and support the congressional resolution.
On Tuesday, Foxman issued a statement recognizing the genocide, saying he
had decided to revisit the issue "out of concern for the unity of the Jewish
community at a time of increased threats against the Jewish people."
In an interview Wednesday, Foxman reiterated his view on the congressional
resolution but said he had agreed to requests to reexamine support for it at
the ADL’s national board meeting in November.
The issue has divided the American Jewish community, with many voicing a
moral imperative to recognize the Armenian genocide and others expressing
concern that doing so would jeopardize Turkish Jews or Israel’s relations
with its strongest Muslim ally.
The congressional resolution, written by Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank),
would declare that the Ottoman Empire killed 1.5 million Armenians between
1915 and 1923 — eliminating them from their historic homeland — and would
call on the president to properly call the massacre a genocide.
Schiff said several American Jewish organizations had conveyed concerns to
him about the resolution’s effect on Turkish Jews and Israel. But he said,
"This has nothing to do with Israel, and it’s a mistake for any pro-Israel
organization to make a connection where none exists."
He said U.S. work against mass killings in Darfur would be undermined
without recognition of the Armenian genocide.
"To speak out on genocide when it is committed by a politically weak state
like Sudan and not recognize it when committed by the predecessor of a
powerful state undermines our leadership and credibility," Schiff said.
He added that the ADL had "sullied its reputation" as a leading civil rights
group by not supporting the resolution.
Foxman said, "He’s entitled to his opinion, but it’s wrong."
Source:
ia/la-me-adl23aug23,1,3504735.story?coll=la-headli nes-pe-california