Trial Of Turkish-Armenian Journalist’s Murder Opens Amid Protests

TRIAL OF TURKISH-ARMENIAN JOURNALIST’S MURDER OPENS AMID PROTESTS
Nicolas Cheviron

Agence France Presse — English
July 2, 2007 Monday 3:53 PM GMT

Eighteen suspects went on trial here Monday for the January murder of
ethnic Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, which sparked fears of rising
nationalist and anti-minority violence in Turkey.

The trial behind closed doors began as Dink’s family said the procedure
was flawed because it excludes security officials who knew as early
as 2006 of plans to kill Dink, but failed to act.

Police in Istanbul and the northern city of Trabzon, home to most
of the suspects, are responsible for "extremely grave mistakes and
almost intentional negligence," family lawyer Ergin Cinmen said
outside the courthouse.

The defendants "are just the tip of the iceberg," he said. "If public
servants are not put on trial, the ruling will never satisfy justice
and public conscience."

In an emotional written statements, Dink’s widow Rakel and his
brother Hosrof appealed to the court to shed light on the involvement
of officials.

"Have the courage to challenge them… Let the justice of God work
through you so that the trial may become a point of enlightenment
for Turkey," Rakel said.

"This trial is between those who defend the legal system and those
who claim they are the law and the state," Hosrof said. "It will be
a turning point for Turkey if the trial sheds light on the truth."

As police sealed off the street leading to the courthouse, about
2,500 demonstrators, most of them dressed in black, gathered at a
nearby square and unfurled a large banner that read: "We are all
witnesses. We want justice."

"We are all Hrant Dink. We are all Armenians," they chanted.

Dink, 52, a prominent member of Turkey’s tiny Armenian minority,
was gunned down on January 19 outside the offices of his bilingual
Turkish-Armenian weekly Agos, in central Istanbul.

Although he campaigned for reconciliation, nationalists hated Dink
for calling the killing hundreds of thousands of Armenians under
Ottoman rule during World War I genocide, a label most Turks despise
and Ankara officially rejects.

The suspected gunman, 17-year-old Ogun Samast, has admitted to shooting
Dink because he was an "enemy of the Turks," the indictment says.

Samast faces 18 to 24 years for the murder and a further
eight-and-a-half to 18 for belonging to a terrorist organisation.

The prosecution did not seek a life sentence because he is a minor,
which is also why the trial is closed to the public.

Samast refused to speak at Monday’s hearing, Dink family lawyer
Fethiye Cetin told reporters.

Two other key figures — Yasin Hayal and Erhan Tuncel, both 26 —
are accused of leading the ultra-nationalist group Samast belonged
to and masterminding the murder.

They could be jailed for life without the possibility of parole if
found guilty.

The indictment says Tuncel was a police informer who twice told
officials in 2006 that Hayal was plotting to kill Dink, but
deliberately concealed the fact that someone else would pull the
trigger because Tuncel himself was part of the plot.

Hayal had earlier served 11 months for the 2004 bombing in Trabzon of
a McDonalds restaurant, in which six people were injured, to protest
against the US-led invasion of Iraq.

He is also accused of threatening Turkey’s 2006 Nobel Literature
laureate Orhan Pamuk, who has also contested the official line on
the Armenian killings.

Hayal and Tuncel traded accusations before the judge, lawyer Oguz
Ugur Olca said.

Tuncel rejected any involvement in the murder, saying he was a simple
informer who did his "duty" by tipping off the police about the plot.

Hayal said Tuncel masterminded both the Dink assassination and the
McDonalds bombing; Tuncel called Hayal a "schizophrenic," Olca said.

The 15 other suspects face sentences of seven-and-a-half to 35 years.

Turquie: Debut Du =?unknown?q?Proc=E8s?= Des Meurtriers Presumes De

TURQUIE: DEBUT DU PROCèS DES MEURTRIERS PRESUMES DE HRANT DINK

Agence France Presse
(Actualisation, Papier General)
2 juillet 2007 lundi 3:58 PM GMT

Deux principaux suspects du meurtre du journaliste turc d’origine
armenienne Hrant Dink ont echange des accusations, selon les avocats
presents, a l’ouverture lundi a Istanbul du procès de 18 personnes
impliquees dans cet assassinat qui avait bouleverse la Turquie
en janvier.

Le premier des accuses, Ogun Samast, chômeur de 17 ans originaire de
Trabzon (nord-est) et membre d’un groupuscule ultra-nationalistes de
cette ville, a refuse de s’exprimer, ont dit les avocats de la partie
civile, parlant aux journalistes lors de la seance a huis clos.

C’est Samast qui, de son propre aveu, a abattu de trois balles Hrant
Dink le 19 janvier a Istanbul, devant les locaux de l’hebdomadaire
bilingue turc-armenien Agos, que dirigeait le journaliste.

Yasin Hayal et Erhan Tuncel, qui comparaissent aux côtes de Samast,
sont, selon l’acte d’accusation, les deux dirigeants du groupe et
les commanditaires de l’assassinat.

Hayal a deja passe 11 mois en prison pour un attentat a la bombe visant
un restaurant McDonald’s a Trabzon, qui avait fait six blesses en 2004.

Selon l’acte d’accusation, Tuncel, qui etait egalement informateur
de police, avait a deux reprises en 2006 fait savoir aux forces de
securite que Hayal preparait un attentat contre Hrant Dink.

Mais, poursuit l’acte, faisant partie lui-meme du complot, il n’a
pas dit que l’assassin serait une troisième personne.

Selon Oguz Ugur Olca, avocat de la partie civile, les deux se sont
mutuellement accuses lors de la première seance, Tuncel declarant
que l’assassinat avait ete planifie par Tuncel.

Ce dernier a traite Hayal de "schizophrène", tout en proclamant son
innocence et maintenant qu’il n’etait qu’un simple informateur qui
avait fait son "devoir" en informant ses superieurs du complot contre
le vie de Dink.

Le procureur a requis contre Samast 18 a 24 ans de prison pour meurtre
et 8,5 ans a 18 ans pour port d’arme illegal et appartenance a une
organisation terroriste. Le huis-clos a ete ordonne en raison de
son âge.

Hayal et Tuncel encourent des peines de prison a vie incompressibles,
alors que des peines allant de 7,5 ans a 35 ans de prison ont ete
requises contre 15 autres accuses.

Les forces de l’ordre avaient boucle la rue menant au tribunal
de Besiktas, dans le centre d’Istanbul, alors que quelque 2.500
manifestants, la plupart vetus en noir, s’etaient rassembles sur une
place avoisinante sous une banderole proclamant: "Nous sommes tous
temoins. Nous voulons la justice".

La foule a applaudi l’arrivee de la veuve du journaliste, Rakel,
qui a participe brièvement a la manifestation.

Les avocats de la partie civile avaient exprime dès vendredi leur
mecontentement avec la procedure, deplorant que d’autres protagonistes,
notamment des forces de l’ordre, ne soient pas poursuivis.

"Les forces de securite (…) n’ont pas ete incluses dans le dossier,
alors que leurs liens avec les suspects, le non accomplissement de
leur devoir, leur dissimulation de preuves et meme leur apologie du
crime et du criminel ont ete etablis", avait-elle deplore vendredi.

Dans des declarations ecrites soumises a la cour, Rakel Dink et
Hosrof, frere du journaliste, ont demande que le tribunal fasse la
lumière sur l’implication dans l’assassinat, selon eux, des membres
des forces de l’ordre.

"Ayez le courage de les defier… Soyez l’instrument de la justice
de dieux pour que ce procès puisse devenir un moment d’illumination
pour la Turquie," a dit Mme. Dink.

"Ce procès est entre ceux qui defendent le système legal et ceux qui
pretendent etre l’Etat et la loi", a declare de son côte Hosrof Dink.

"S’il met la lumière sur la verite, il s’agira d’un tournant pour
la Turquie".

Hrant Dink, qui militait pour une reconciliation entre Turcs et
Armeniens, s’etait attire la haine des cercles nationalistes pour avoir
ouvertement qualifie de genocide les massacres d’Armeniens commis en
Anatolie entre 1915 et 1917, une qualification rejetee par la Turquie.

–Boundary_(ID_dniYJQffg6OgNoQzm+KcOg)–

La Violence Nationaliste Au Coeur Du Pouvoir Turc

LA VIOLENCE NATIONALISTE AU COEUR DU POUVOIR TURC
Par Thierry Oberle

Le Figaro, France
02 juillet 2007

L’AVOCAT stanbouliote Kemal Kerincsiz est un adepte de la theorie
du complot : il voit les services secrets occidentaux ou le Mossad
derrière la serie d’assassinats politiques et de meurtres de religieux
chretiens. Dans son bureau decore de cartes de la grande Turquie, ses
explications fumeuses lui servent de parade lorsqu’il est interroge
sur les responsabilites des nationalistes turcs dans l’elimination du
journaliste d’origine armenienne Hrant Dink, en janvier a Istanbul,
du père Santoro, l’an dernier a Trabzon, ou des trois missionnaires
sauvagement mis a mort en avril a Malatya.

Animateur de l’Union des juristes turcs, Kemal Kerincsiz est a
l’origine de la plupart des procès intentes ces dernières annees
a des intellectuels turcs pour insulte a la nation. Ses ennemis :
les elites liberales, les minorites non musulmanes et les Kurdes.

Les missionnaires chretiens ? " Des gens très dangereux dont il
faut interdire les activites. " Orhan Pamuk et Elif Safak, ces
romanciers qui osent briser les tabous de l’histoire officielle
? " Ils cherchent a faire passer les Turcs pour des barbares au
profit de mouvements etrangers ", commente-t-il d’un air inspire,
en levant le menton. L’avocat ultranationaliste mène son combat par
la voie legale dans les pretoires des tribunaux. Il porte plainte
en se referant a l’article 301 du Code penal adopte en juin 2005,
qui punit de peines de prison les auteurs d’atteinte a l’honneur de la
Turquie. D’autres ont des methodes plus expeditives. Comme Ogun Samast,
17 ans, ce jeune desoeuvre d’un village de la banlieue de Trabzon,
un bastion des ultranationalistes, juge a partir d’aujourd’hui pour
l’assassinat du journaliste Hrant Dink d’une balle de pistolet. Le
jeune a ete arrete sur le chemin du retour vers la ville des bords
de la mer Noire où fut assassine en 2006 le pretre italien. Lors de
son interpellation, les policiers l’ont photographie a leurs côtes
a l’instar d’une vedette de football. " Un plan de destabilisation "
" Qui a manipule Ogun Samast ? ", s’interroge Fethiye Cetin, amie et
avocate de Hrant Dink. Dans chaque crime, des gangs nationalistes
prônant le sectarisme religieux sont mis en cause. Mais jamais
les enquetes ne remontent aux commanditaires. Les complicites a
l’interieur de l’appareil d’Etat sont pourtant averees. Samast avait
ainsi pour complice Ehran Tuncel, un indic qui avait prevenu les
policiers locaux. Ceux-ci avaient redige pas moins de 17 rapports
sur les risques d’elimination du patron du journal Agos, mais ne
l’avaient pas protege. Après l’attentat, l’un d’eux avait demande a
son informateur au cours d’une conversation telephonique " si les
siens etaient meles a l’affaire ". Rapidement occultee, la tuerie
de Malatya rappelle les methodes du Hezbollah, un groupuscule des
annees 1980 manipule par les services de renseignement dans la lutte
contre les Kurdes. " On a l’impression qu’un plan de destabilisation
a commence d’etre execute. Ces initiateurs agissent en l’absence
de tout contrôle pour creer de la tension dans le pays ", assure
l’avocat kurde Hesip Kaplan. Il evoque l’ombre d’Evit Devlet, l’Etat
profond, une conjonction d’interet où se retrouvent des malfrats, la
mafia politico-financière et des membres de l’appareil d’Etat. " Les
nationalistes et les fondamentalistes veulent empecher l’application
des mesures liberales ", assure un dignitaire religieux chretien.

Les groupuscules d’extreme droite prospèrent sur fond de racisme, de
xenophobie et d’intolerance. " Les discours effrayants de haine que
l’on entend de plus en plus souvent relient chaque affaire. Après
Hrant, puis Malatya, maintenant on se demande a qui le tour ? ",
s’inquiète Fethiye Cetin.

–Boundary_(ID_JSW1zCqB2Odl7dGy5mtr/A)–

Calouste Gulbenkian Au Service Du Patrimoine

CALOUSTE GULBENKIAN AU SERVICE DU PATRIMOINE

Le Figaro, France
02 juillet 2007

ARMENIEN de Turquie, Calouste Gulbenkian (1869-1955) a bâti une immense
fortune dans les petroles du Proche-Orient en meme temps qu’il se
prenait de passion pour l’art sous toutes ses formes, avec un goût
très sûr. Il crea une fondation ayant pour but l’art, la science et
la bienfaisance, qui dispose aujourd’hui d’un patrimoine financier
s’elevant a 3 milliards d’euros et dispose d’un budget annuel de 110
millions d’euros. Toutes ses collections, 6 000 pièces qui comptent
parmi les oeuvres majeures, sont desormais reunies dans le Musee
Gulbenkian, a Lisbonne, où 1 500 d’entre elles sont exposees.

Elles ratissent très large, de la numismatique a l’egyptologie,
en passant par les tapis persans, l’art chinois et japonais, les
enluminures et, bien entendu, la peinture, depuis les primitifs
italiens jusqu’a Manet, Renoir, Monet, Degas. Quant aux generations
suivantes, il ne les aimait pas ! Si le Centre Gulbenkian, a Paris,
demeure, malgre ses nombreuses activites, un lieu peu frequente
par les Francais, son nouveau directeur, João Pedro Garcia, a bien
l’intention de booster la vieille institution et d’en faire " un
pont entre la culture portugaise et l’Europe ". Il a ouvert dans ses
locaux du 51, avenue d’Iena, une grande retrospective Maria Elena
Vieira da Silva, qui aurait eu 99 ans cette annee. Comme toutes les
manifestations de cette fondation privee (notamment des concerts),
elle est d’accès gratuit.

–Boundary_(ID_yrBwGdlZz2i7GboNbYt/dQ)–

Dogu Perincek Persiste Par Le Biais De Partisans

DOGU PERINCEK PERSISTE PAR LE BIAIS DE PARTISANS

Le Matin
Edition Semaine
02 juillet 2007 lundi

Deux de ses proches sous enquete;
Negationnisme.

WINTERTHOUR (ZH)Deux proches du president du Parti du travail turc
violent la norme penale antiraciste lors d’une reunion nationaliste

Une enquete penale pour discrimination raciale a ete ouverte contre
deux proches de Dogu Perincek a Winterthour (ZH). Les deux hommes
sont soupconnes d’avoir nie le genocide armenien samedi lors d’une
reunion nationaliste turque.

kRemis en liberte

Ils ont persiste dans leurs propos lorsqu’ils ont ete interroges par
le parquet, a indique la police cantonale zurichoise hier dans un
communique. Ces declarations violent la norme penale antiraciste. Le
representant du Parti du travail turc en Allemagne et l’organisateur
de la rencontre a Winterthour estiment neanmoins ne pas etre coupables,
a precise le procureur Andrej Gnehm.

Les deux hommes ont ete interpelles, puis remis en liberte samedi
deja. L’enquete se poursuit. M. Gnehm n’etait pas en mesure de dire
combien de temps elle devrait durer.

kMysterieux visa

La police a egalement releve en marge de la reunion les identites d’une
vingtaine de personnes qui defilaient avec des affiches qualifiant
le genocide armenien de mensonge.

Le president du Parti du travail turc, Dogu Perincek, condamne a
Lausanne pour negation du genocide armenien, n’a pas pu intervenir
lors de cette conference. Il semble qu’il n’ait pas obtenu de visa
d’entree pour la Suisse. Il n’est toutefois pas clair si un tel visa
a effectivement ete demande.

M. Perincek a ecope en mars de 9 0 jours-amendes (10 0 francs par jour)
avec sursis pendant deux ans et d’une amende de 300 0 francs.

Le Tribunal de police de Lausanne lui a egalement demande de verser
100 0 francs "symboliques" a l’Association Suisse-Armenie (ASA),
qui s’etait constituee partie civile. Dogu Perincek a annonce vouloir
faire recours auprès du Tribunal federal.

–Boundary_(ID_y/JObF2td80ff6aHk1kLZA)–

Pas De Conference Pour Dogu Perincek

PAS DE CONFERENCE POUR DOGU PERINCEK

Le Matin
Edition Demanche
01 juillet 2007 dimanche

Dogu Perincek, condamne a Lausanne pour negationnisme du genocide
armenien, n’a pas pu intervenir lors d’une conference publique prevue
a Winterthour. Le president du Parti du travail (PT) n’a pas obtenu
de visa d’entree.

"C’est risible et indigne d’une democratie", a declare aux
5 0 personnes presentes Ali Mercan, representant du PT en
Allemagne. M. Mercan et le co-organisateur de la conference Ethem
Kayali ont ete interroges durant une demi-heure par la police, qui
les a emmenes auprès du parquet de Winterthour/Unterland.

La police cantonale de Zurich soupconne M. Mercan d’avoir fait des
remarques en langue turque niant le genocide, a-t-elle fait savoir dans
un communique hier. La police a egalement releve les identites d’une
vingtaine de personnes qui defilaient avec des affiches qualifiant
le genocide armenien de mensonge.

–Boundary_(ID_zoy/g/PO3tezNOjnnJeO0w)- –

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Leaders Of "Heritage" Armenian Party Discuss Domestic, Regional Issu

LEADERS OF "HERITAGE" ARMENIAN PARTY DISCUSS DOMESTIC, REGIONAL ISSUES WITH EUROPEAN AMBASSADORS

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
July 2 2007

YEREVAN, July 2. /ARKA/. Members of the parliament group of "Heritage"
Armenian opposition party discussed domestic and regional issues with
the delegation of Ambassadors of EU member-countries.

The delegation of European Ambassadors consisted of Wendellin Heitmeyer
(Austria), Bruno Genne (France), Eberhard Koelsch (Germany), Peteris
Elfertz (Latvia), Stelian Stoyan (Romania), Alexander Alekseev (Russia)
and Per Sjorgen (Sweden).

The participants addressed issues of Armenia’s democratic development,
settlements of the conflicts in the Caucasus and Europe, as well as
regional and geopolitical security challenges.

In presenting the opinion of "Heritage" on the issues, the leader
of the parliament group of the party Raffi Hovhannisian expressed
regrets that despite the current practice and Armenia’s commitments
members of "Heritage" and other opposition parties were not involved
in the Armenian delegation to participate in the summer session of
PACE in Strasbourg.

In the Armenian parliament election on May 12 "Heritage" party gained
seven seats in the new parliament. "Orintats Erkir" opposition party
received 9 parliamentary mandates.

"Heritage" is a party of national-liberal trend founded in 2002 by
the first Armenian Foreign Minister Raffi Hovhannisian. The party
has close ties with the Armenian community of USA and image of
West-oriented party.

Members of the party number 5,000 people currently.

Government’s Program Adopted

GOVERNMENT’S PROGRAM ADOPTED

Yerkir.am
July 01, 2007

"The program presented to your attention is rather ambitious and its
implementation will require maximum efforts from all staff of the
state administration bodies," Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan presented
the government’s program to the National Assembly.

The program was adopted with the absolute majority of votes. Republican
Party, Prosperous Armenia Party and ARF factions voted for the program,
Rule of Law Country faction abstained from voting and Heritage Party
voted against.

The Prime Minister stressed the five priorities of the program –
national security and sustainable development, efficient public
administration, education and science, equal development of all
regions, social protection of Armenian citizens. The government
is planning to accomplish 8-10% real annual growth of the GDP
in 2007-2012, 10% growth of investments, significant reduction
of poverty, annual increases of pensions, increased financing of
the public healthcare and education, etc. Prime Minister Sargsyan
assured that the government is open for cooperation in the course of
implementation of its program.

Members of the ARF faction expressed their position on the government’s
program during the discussions in the National Assembly.

The statement made by Ara Nranian, member of the ARF’s parliamentary
faction

The development of any country reaches a point when it is necessary
to stop for a while, look back at the road the country has passed
and choose a new road for development, a new ideology for ensuring
progress. In this context, we have some reservations regarding the
program presented by the government.

However, realizing that such changes can be accomplished only when you
form the government, as well as respecting the government’s decision
to present the program in this format and based on these principles,
we decided to go for improvement of the document.

I would like to concentrate on the main proposals we made in regard
to the economic issues. First of all, I would like to point out the
section on industry where implementation of industrial policies,
necessity for an efficient branch-structured economy, industrial
development is stated. We firmly belief that Armenia cannot have
long-term sustainable development only through development of the
construction and service sectors and increase of trade deficit through
transfer. This is why the ARF stressed the importance of correct and
efficient branch structure of the economy.

The next important issue on which we reached an agreement with the
government is the necessity to develop the national airline carrier,
re-equipment and training of its staff. We hope that consistent
implementation of the above-mentioned principles will create the
necessary condition not only for the development of civic aviation but
also for exploitation of our relative advantage and the peculiarities
of our market.

One of the most important accomplishments is the section on foreign
economic policies included into the government’s program. The previous
government programs did not have anything like this because the
previous governments did not pay adequate attention to the problems
of domestic producers and especially the exporters. Development of
domestic production, exports growth and introduction of Armenian
products to foreign markets is the only way for ensuring sustainable
economic development for Armenia, development of entrepreneurship,
solution of the unemployment issue and increase of the state budget
revenues.

We can call our principles and proposals on the reform of economic
policies the "national reformist course" of the economy.

There were principles on which we did not reach an agreement with the
government. One of such principles was the issue of tax revenues. The
government program envisages increase of the tax revenues by 0.3-0.4%
annually. Such a target has never been met. Meanwhile we believe it
is fully realistic to achieve the target of 1% annual growth of tax
revenues through implementation of economic policies and reduction of
the shadow economy. The shadow economy is not only about low level of
tax revenues. We see the shadow economy as a multi-level phenomenon. We
believe the volume and turnout of the Armenian economy are much greater
than the figures presented by the official statistics. In other words,
we think the first problem to be addressed is to present the true
image of the economy.

On the second level we consider increase of the tax revenue as GDP
percentage. On the third level we see the hidden employment which
according to today’s estimates amounts to 200 thousand people. We
believe it is possible to achieve a tax revenue of 25% of the GDP
with such an approach.

The government has planned for a 0.3-0.4% annual growth of tax revenues
but we keep in our mind the annual growth of 1% with the further aim
of discussing this issue in the future.

The statement made by Artsvik Minassian, member of the ARF’s
parliamentary faction

It should be stated that the scope and the quality of the present
program are better than the previous government’s program. We have
participated in the development of some of the provisions of this
program. The program’s provisions on active demographic policies
deserve special appreciation. This strategy as a priority for the
government combined with implementation of provisions on repatriation
inspire a hope that Armenia might achieve a balanced gender and age
distribution of its population.

The next accomplishment of the program in terms of our shared
position is the government’s commitment to develop and implement a
strategy for remuneration of public servants. This is an important
anti-corruption measure. The government should set the standards for
determining the remuneration of public servants based on the quality,
complexity and market value of the services delivered by them, and
the necessary system of social protection should be determined as a
consequence. Through these measures the government can improve the
quality of the public service and set an example for similar policies
in the private sector.

The next important accomplishment is inclusion of ARF’s approaches
on corporate social responsibility and mandatory social insurance
in the government’s program. We have diverging positions with the
government on several issues. I would like to comment on some of them.

First of all, the Constitution states that Armenia is a social
state. This at least means that we must set the minimum living standard
and reform the entire social-economic policies in the country based
on this standard.

However, the present program is not based on such a standard. Instead,
it uses the concept of the poverty line that has nothing to do with
the minimum living basket. Apart from this, the system of social
benefits, including family benefits, is seen as an efficient means
of poverty reduction.

Meanwhile, it is common knowledge that the benefits are or must be a
temporary solution. The society cannot eliminate poverty in the long
term by receiving poverty benefits.

This problem can be solved through income generation and job creation.

Following the provisions of our electoral campaign we proposed to
set the minimum salary at 50 thousand drams in 2008. However, the
Prime Minister did not accept this proposal. Instead, he agreed to
instruct the relevant agencies to present analysis and calculations
to explore this possibility.

We will follow up on this issue and present our position.

Concluding my statement, let me express my confidence that we will
be able to multiply the positive accomplishments we can see today in
cooperation with the President, the government, the civil society, and
the political forces represented and not represented in the National
Assembly. I wish the government efficient work for the benefit of
the nation.

The statement made by Hrayr Karapetian, head of the ARF’s parliamentary
faction

I would like to stress that the ARF has participated in the discussion
of the government’s draft program in the framework of the agreement
signed with the coalition government. We had our own approach and
principles regarding the program. Our faction presented a series of
proposals to the Prime Minister and the authors of the program based on
these principles. A significant portion of the proposals were accepted
and included into the draft. Some of the proposals, which are equally
important for us, were not accepted or will be discussed further.

As a socialist force, the ARF places a great importance on efficient
social security policies as the priority for the government’s
activities. We also stress the importance of active demographic
policies as a priority and a component of national security, and we
see the family as the main subject of the government’s demographic
policies.

ARF believes the role and responsibility of the government in ensuring
efficient functioning of the economy with all its branches should
be strengthened. Shadow economy must be combated. Anti-monopoly
policies must be adopted as an important economic policy. The minimum
living standard must be set as a necessary precondition for poverty
reduction and sustainable economic development. The small and medium
enterprises need serious government assistance. Unequal distribution
of property and unequal opportunities for property owners undermines
national conciliation.

The ARF stresses the importance of the provision in the program on
elimination of the discrepancy between the pensions and the minimum
salary.

We hope that in 2008 the minimum salary will be increased by two times
and mechanisms of its annual indexation will be introduced. It is time
for the government to take the responsibility for continuous increase
of the pensions and salaries in the public sector. The employers in
the private sector should also continuously increase their employees’
salaries.

The proposals made in regard to the provisions on foreign economic
policies, air transportation, energy system, healthcare, Diaspora
and repatriation, defense and security were of crucial importance
for the ARF. A special proposal was made whereby the government will
introduce an electronic reporting system for the customs and tax
bodies in order to minimize the direct communication between tax
and customs officials and the entrepreneurs. This will reduce the
corruption risks in the tax and customs sectors.

The ARF take a note of the program provision whereby a new
anti-corruption strategy will be developed. We are ready to present our
proposals in this regard. It is time to launch a true fight against
corruption, to prevent monopolicies and protectionism, and to reduce
the shadow economy.

The statement made by Vahan Hovhannissian, Deputy Chairman of the
National Assembly

"This is the first time the government’s program is based on the
National Security Concept".

It is very important for me that for the first time, the government’s
program is based on the national security concept. Now that
the government’s program and the national security concept are
interrelated we can see that the national security concept itself
needs revision. There are provisions in the concept that are either
outdated or were not formulated correctly. I will concentrate on
three such provisions.

First of all, the issue of water supply is viewed by the government as
a serious problem. However, the respective provision in the program
seems to be simply a paragraph with no purpose. Meanwhile, there are
serious problems connected with water resources and networks. The
usage of water resources should be viewed as an issue of national
security since correct usage of potable water is one of the most
important guarantees of Armenia’s national security.

The second issue is culture. Fortunately, the government, and I hope,
also the National Assembly came to realize that historical monuments
are not simply the churches, khachqars or castles on the ground but
also the historical heritage that is under the ground. Development
of archeology is very important in the context of formation of the
country’s cultural image. Several issues deriving from this, such as
development of tourism and science are also very important.

The third issue I would like to draw your attention to is the
Diaspora. We welcome the scope of the section on the Diaspora and
the fact that the ARF’s proposals were accepted. However, there
is one provision in the section that states that the institute of
dual citizenship has yet to be developed. Dear parliament, I want to
remind you that the package of amendments to the Law on Citizenship
was adopted six months ago and the institute of dual citizenship was
introduced as a follow up to the constitutional amendments. However,
so far only the ban on voting abroad has been implemented out of all
the provisions included in the package. No other measures have been
implemented in regard to introduction of dual citizenship. We know
that a working group was created that is supposed to work out the
procedures for introduction of dual citizenship.

When we speak about repatriation and making the relations with the
Diaspora more conceptual, the first thing we should do is to introduce
dual citizenship. I hope the government will present the procedure
in near future.

The above said is not criticism of the drawbacks but a call to
concentrate on these three issues and speed up the work in these
directions. It is possible to do this, and we, as the National
Assembly, are ready to assist the government.

ARF Representatives Meet With Iraqi President

ARF REPRESENTATIVES MEET WITH IRAQI PRESIDENT

Yerkir
02.07.2007 12:56

YEREVAN (YERKIR) – ARF Bureau member Mario Nalbandian and ARF Supreme
Body of Armenia representative Armen Rustamian, who are in Geneva to
participate in the Socialist International council meeting, met on
June 30 with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

The ARF representatives raise the issue of the Armenian community
in Iraq.

The Iraqi president promised to satisfy the needs of the Armenian
community after direct talks and cooperation with the community
members.

Armenian Paper Says Draft Laws Aimed At Banning Radio Liberty Broadc

ARMENIAN PAPER SAYS DRAFT LAWS AIMED AT BANNING RADIO LIBERTY BROADCASTS

Armenian newspaper 168 Zham
Yerevan
30 Jun 07

Excerpt from report by Armine Avetyan in Armenian newspaper 168
Zham published on 30 June and headlined "Slaves against freedom"
and subheaded "The first step against ‘Liberty’ has been made":

Yesterday [28 June] the National Assembly [parliament] passed in the
first reading the draft laws that will help terminate the broadcasting
of the Radio Liberty [Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, RFE/RL] on the
territory of Armenia. The drafts were adopted by 79 votes in favour,
16 against and one abstention.

The draft laws will be voted in the second reading over 24 hours,
and there is no doubt that MPs who come to the parliament just to
push buttons will pass them today because people who do not care for
freedom, do not need free speech either, neither do they care for
the [Radio] Liberty. All button-pushers want is for the government –
that thinks for them – to last as long as possible.

"I wish to explain why I am sure that those are politically-motivated
bills and are ordered at 26 Baghramyan Street – the presidential
office. What was the need to debate those bills in an extraordinary
session [of the parliament]?" Yerevan Press Club expert Mesrop
Harutyunyan asked at yesterday’s news conference.

Amendments to two laws are debated at the National Assembly’s
extraordinary session: the law on TV and radio and the law on state
fees. Authors of the amendments suggest that the Armenian Public
Radio and TV should not have a right to allow any media outlet to
broadcast on its frequencies. Currently, the Public [TV and Radio]
decides on its own whether it should allow others to air on its
frequencies. After the law is passed, the Public [TV and Radio] will
not have the right to allow other broadcasters use its frequencies.

Under the amendments to the law on state fees, TV and radio companies
will have to pay 70,000 drams [about 200 dollars] for each programme
of other broadcasters aired on their frequencies. And since programmes
of only one "other broadcaster" – the Radio Liberty – are aired on
the Public [TV and Radio], there is nothing else left than to admit
that the goal of those draft laws is to terminate the broadcasting
of the Radio Liberty on the territory of Armenia.

"Usually, extraordinary sessions [of parliament] are called to
debate laws that are urgent and crucial for the society," Mesrop
Harutyunyan says. "Now, I am asking [President] Robert Kocharyan and
[Prime Minister] Serzh Sargsyan, who have drafted these amendments. I
am not asking [Justice Minister] Gevorg Danielyan because he is just
a doer. What crucial and urgent needs of the society do these draft
laws meet so that they had to be debated in an extraordinary session?"

[Passage omitted: if included on the agenda of regular sessions,
the draft laws would be discussed in parliamentary committees and by
public before being adopted]

No TV company was present at the yesterday’s news conference condemning
this draft laws. Neither a radio company was present. This fact
led to conclude that TV and radio companies were instructed from 26
Baghramyan Street not to cover the news conference. This means that
electronic media is censored by the residents of this address.

"The authorities intend to fist of all impede the broadcasting of
the Radio Liberty," Ashot Melikyan, chairman of the committee for
protection of free speech, said yesterday. "I can compare this with the
shutdown of the A1 Plus [TV company]. High-ranking officials, however,
had promised during our meetings that any draft law on information
sector would be widely discussed before debated in parliament. [Former
Justice Minister] Davit Harutyunyan, in particular, gave such a
promise. These promises too are not kept. Also, OSCE representative
on freedom of the media Miklos Haraszti’s calls not to adopt these
amendments are ignored too."

The government explains that the amendments are needed to ensure
equality in economic competition in the broadcasting sector.

[Passage omitted: other views on the issue]

Our authorities have never worried about the channels that rebroadcast
[foreign] programmes because they have never caused problems for them;
they air programmes about Armenia very rarely. The Radio Liberty,
in contrast, airs programmes that deal with the Armenian domestic
and political life, and this poised danger to the authorities.

[Passage omitted: the president will undoubtedly sign the drafts
into law]

So, Armenia will become the next country following Uzbekistan,
Turkmenistan, Belarus and Azerbaijan to ban the broadcasting of the
Radio Liberty.