ANKARA: UN Exhibit Delayed Upon Objection From Turkey

UN EXHIBIT DELAYED UPON OBJECTION FROM TURKEY

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
April 11 2007

A UN exhibit on the 13th anniversary of the Rwanda genocide has been
delayed after Turkey’s objections to a reference to the killings of
Anatolian Armenians during World War I as genocide.

A UN exhibit on the 13th anniversary of the Rwanda genocide has been
delayed after Turkey’s objections to a reference to the killings of
Anatolian Armenians during World War I as genocide, organizers said on
Monday, while Ambassador Baki Ýlkin, Turkey’s permanent representative
to the UN, made it clear that Turkey’s objection was also supported
by other UN countries, thus delaying the opening of the exhibit.

The exhibit, organized in part by the British-based Aegis Trust, was
scheduled to be opened on Monday by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

But Turkey objected to a sentence in the text that said, "How the
Armenian killings contributed to the creation of the term ‘genocide’,"
according to James Smith, chief executive of Aegis, whose mission is
to prevent genocide.

It said: "Following World War I, during which 1 million Armenians were
murdered in Turkey, Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin urged the League of
Nations to recognize crimes of barbarity as international crimes,"
Smith said.

"It is wrong to draw a parallel between the genocide in Rwanda and
the Armenian allegations," Ambassador Ýlkin said, as he emphasized
that other countries had also objected to the exhibit, not only
Turkey. Organizers said they were informed of the delay by the UN
Department of Public Information, which had initially approved the
exhibit in the visitors’ lobby. The secretary-general’s office
then consented to the postponement. UN officials confirmed that
objections by Turkey and other countries, which they did not name,
were responsible for the delay. One staff member said an official in
the Department of Public Information had not sent the text to other
divisions for fact-checking.

Turkey notified the UN secretariat of its objection last week, Ýlkin
explained. The ambassador stressed that there has been no hesitation
in describing what happened in Rwanda as genocide: "The UN secretariat
called us [on Monday] and said they have come to the conclusion that
the exhibition should be reviewed not only due to Turkey’s concerns,
but also in general terms and that the exhibition has been delayed
until this review is finished."

UN Associate Spokesman Farhan Haq also said that the exhibit has been
postponed until the regular review process is completed.

Turkey strongly denies claims by Armenia and its supporters that the
Ottoman Empire committed a systematic genocide against Armenians during
World War I. Ankara claims figures of deaths in the low millions are
greatly exaggerated.

–Boundary_(ID_Zstbmy+Oj5MRqn/zeEzGL A)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Republican Party Condemns Attackes Against Its Major Challenger In M

REPUBLICAN PARTY CONDEMNS ATTACKS AGAINST ITS MAJOR CHALLENGER IN MAY 12 POLLS

ARMENPRESS
Apr 12 2007

YEREVAN, APRIL 12, ARMENPRESS: The Republican Party of Armenia was
the first political party to condemn two successive attacks on offices
of the Prosperous Armenia party today morning. The Prosperous Armenia
of a millionaire businessman Gagik Tsarukian, is tipped, by the way,
to be the leading challenger to the ruling Republican Party in the
May parliamentary elections.

A statement by the Republican Party condemned the attacks as ‘mean
and base moves directed against all political forces of the country
and its people."

"Only those who are not able to conduct fair and just political
struggle resort to such low means and are ready to destabilize the
situation making no difference between the means,’ the statement said.

The party’s statement calls on all parties to use every occasion of
cooperation for the sake of holding clean elections on May 12.

Two offices of the Prosperous Armenia were ripped through by
explosions in the early hours today morning. No one was injured in the
blasts. President Robert Kocharian ordered law enforcement agencies
to swiftly investigate the incident.

Prosperous Armenia was founded in 2005 by wealthy businessman Gagik
Tsarukian . Tensions between the two rival parties have increased in
recent days, with scuffles reported between campaigning activists.

The Prosperous Armenia also condemned the attacks against its offices
saying in a statement that this crime is against all Armenians. The
party called on law-enforcers to take every possible action to detect
the culprits and hold them accountable.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Restored Church Opened As Good-Will Gesture

RESTORED CHURCH OPENED AS GOOD-WILL GESTURE

Monday Morning, Lebanon
April 9 2007

Turkey has opened a restored ancient Armenian church in the east of
the country as part of its efforts to heal ties with Armenia that
have long been poisoned by their common bloody past.

The ceremony follows a 1.9-million-dollar (1.4-million-euro)
restoration of the Church of the Holy Cross on the island of Aghtamar
in the middle of Lake Van.

Turkish officials have welcomed the restoration of the 10th-century
edifice as a step towards reconciliation with Armenia, though it will
not function as a religious site.

A 20-member Armenian delegation, led by Deputy Culture Minister Gagik
Gyurjian, attended the ceremony as guests of Turkish Culture Minister
Atilla Koc.

Bilateral contacts are rare between the two neighbors, which have no
diplomatic relations and whose border has remained closed for more
than a decade. Turkish and Armenian officials usually meet on the
sidelines of international gatherings.

The head of Armenia’s Apostolic Church, Karekin II, Catholicos of
Echmiadzin, however declined Ankara’s invitation to attend because
the restored church was being converted into a museum and the ceremony
would be a non-religious one. Turkey intends to treat the edifice as
a historical monument rather than a place of worship.

In an address to the gathering, Patriarch Mesrob II, spiritual leader
of Turkey’s tiny Armenian community, urged the Ankara government
to allow periodic services at the church, which he said would help
Turkish-Armenian reconciliation and boost regional tourism.

"A religious service to be held once a year, for example, and a
subsequent festival on Akdamar would draw people scattered throughout
the world to this island to pray," the patriarch said. "Thus, I hope,
steps can be taken that will one day establish the atmosphere of
dialogue between the two peoples that has so far eluded us."

The patriarch said that he had sent a letter to Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan to that effect.

Queried by reporters on the patriarch’s request, Koc said the issue
was not in his jurisdiction.

The Church of the Holy Cross was built between 915 and 921 during the
reign of Armenian King Gagik I of Vaspurakan and is considered one of
the most outstanding examples of Armenian architecture from that era.

It was abandoned after World War I when, Armenia claims, up to 1.5
million Armenians perished in systematic deportations and killings
by the Ottoman Empire.

Turkey, the successor of the Ottoman Empire, categorically denies
claims of genocide and says thousands of Turks and Armenians were
killed in civil strife during 1915-1917 when Armenians took up arms
for independence in Eastern Anatolia and sided with Russian troops
invading the crumbling empire.

Much to Turkey’s ire, many countries have recognized the killings
as genocide. The dispute has strained Turkish-Armenian ties. Ankara
recognized Yerevan’s independence in 1991 but no diplomatic relations
were established because of Armenian efforts to have the killings
internationally acknowledged as genocide.

In 1993, Turkey also shut its border with Armenia in a show of
solidarity with its close ally Azerbaijan, which was at war with
Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave, dealing a heavy economic
blow on the impoverished country.

Timid efforts at Turkish-Armenian reconciliation suffered a setback
in January when journalist Hrant Dink, one of Turkey’s most prominent
ethnic Armenians, was shot dead in Istanbul by an ultra-nationalist
teenager.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Rwanda: Genocide Commemoration Without French Arrogance

RWANDA: GENOCIDE COMMEMORATION WITHOUT FRENCH ARROGANCE
Florence Mutesi

The New Times (Kigali)
April 11 2007

To many Rwandans, 2007 is the first time for Rwanda to commemorate
the death of their beloved ones free of the French arrogance which
had characterised all the past years. Every time Rwandans would be
preparing for the commemoration week, France would put blame either
on the government in general or the president in particular.

One cannot mention all the French allegations because they are of no
help to anyone now. The only allegation I can mention now is when one
French judge claimed that President Kagame was responsible for the
shooting down of former president Juvenal Habyarimana in April 1994,
which triggered off the 100 days of a blood bath.

The French Judge’s intention, and indeed that of all the French of
tarnishing the current government was instead a turning point for the
Rwandan community. The report exposed the French’s arrogance when
they all kept quite including those who were in the country at the
time of the plane crash, not even the soldiers who were guarding the
airport at the time.

They showed no remorse in their responsibility in the three months
of mayhem, they turn round to accuse the people who stopped what they
had started. The Rwandan government was forced to take action that the
world least expected; to expel the French and all their organisations
and businesses closed down.

Those who thought that they had something to say about the Rwandan
Genocide were free to do so but not to add an insult to injury. Today
Rwandans must be relieved to commemorate the death of their loved
ones in the absence of the French.

This means Rwanda is interested in fighting any thing that may lead
to Genocide again, not only in Rwanda, but every where in the world.

President Paul Kagame challenges critics who say that Rwanda was
capitalizing on the genocide. He says if any political capital is being
made out of the Genocide, they (those who think so) can go and have it.

The people of Rwanda were tortured, raped and infected with HIV and
are living in abject poverty. The president observed on the 10th
year commemoration that survivors have endeavoured to live with
their tormentors.

He requested the international community to cooperate in the fight
against Genocide through international solidarity even when they are
guilty of sin of omission.

President Kagame says that when Genocide takes place, the international
community should not shy away from military intervention when
necessary.

More than 930,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were estimated to have
died in Kigali alone during the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda.

Although the evil minded people cannot totally change, France’s silence
about what they used to say is a relief to Rwandans, what is running
in their mind is not our business.

Genocide Memorial sites were constructed around Rwanda to remind
Rwandans and the world of the massacres that took place in the
country and other parts of the world such as the Armenian and
Cambodian genocides. Memorial sites were also meant to show the way
to reconciliation.

The former President of the United States Clinton visited Rwanda in
1998 and expressed sorrow and regret for the victims of the Genocide
and mourned the lives lost.

Clinton was not in Rwanda by the time the Genocide took place but he
regretted what happened, why can’t France, which was active on ground
to the end of the Habyarimana’s regime, and also extended financial
and a training hand to the Interahamwe, apologise and regret what
happened. If they cannot, then they should remain silent as we treat
our wounds.

Since the 13th commemoration has coincided with Christ’s day of
resurrection (Easter) and in the absence of the French’s arrogance,
let us relate Jesus’ resurrection to that of our broken hearts,
gather as Rwandans and continue praying for the innocent Rwandans
who died like Him.

We mourn, we pray, grieve for our sisters, brothers, parents, who
were victims of the merciless hearts. One says tomorrow, we will
remember, speak out, and act for humanity. Rwanda’s children, like
those everywhere, must be assured of a future full of hope, dignity,
and peace.

On March 31, a man of God preached in church about numbers and said
some numbers were traditionally not liked.

He said that the numbers were also biblical. Among the good numbers
he mentioned was 7.

He said the number is controlled by God himself. He said the 2007 is
a special year in which God will make wonders for his beloved ones.

Even though the preacher did not talk about this number in relation
to the 13th commemoration, I came to think about it and realized that
there is something with Rwanda’s real living at least.

Support H. Res. 106 And S. Res. 106 Recognizing The Armenian Genocid

SUPPORT H. RES. 106 AND S. RES. 106 RECOGNIZING THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
By Gene Rossides

Hellenic News of America, PA
April 11 2007

If you want to support the rule of law in international affairs;
if you want the U.S. Congress officially to recognize the Armenian
Genocide, the first holocaust in the 20th century; if you want to
publicize genocides so as to help stop current genocides and help
prevent future genocides, then support H. Res. 106 and S. Res. 106,
the bipartisan resolutions in the House and Senate which recognize
the Armenian Genocide.

H. Rees. 106 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives
on January 30, 2007 by Representative Adam Schiff (D-29th CA) for
himself and co-sponsors Representatives George Radanovich (R-19th
CA), Frank Pallone (D-6th NJ), Joseph Knollenberg (R-9th MI), Brad
Sherman (D-27th CA), and Thaddeus McCotter (R-11th MI). H. Res. 106
was referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Chairman Tom
Lantos (D-12th CA) has not scheduled a vote.

As of April 5, 2007, there are 184 co-sponsors of H. Res. 106. House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi has indicated she will seek a vote on H. Res.
106 but has not set a date. In my judgment, if a vote is allowed in
the House, H. Res. 106 will pass.

S. Res. 106 was introduced in the U.S. Senate by Senator Richard J.
Durbin (D-IL), Majority Whip, with 25 co-sponsors as of April
5, 2007. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME) is one of the original
co-sponsors. S. Res. 106 was referred to the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee.

In previous years, the Bush administration and the previous Clinton
administration were, unfortunately, able to convince Congress not
to allow a vote. This year Speaker Pelosi, with bipartisan support,
hopefully will allow the Congress to act on H. Res. 106.

The Turkish government is going all-out to prevent a vote. Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates have
written a joint letter to Congressional leaders, including committee
chairs, opposing the Armenian Genocide resolutions by Congress.

Representative Adam Schiff

The appeasement of Turkey, a disloyal ally, by Gates and Rice
is embarrassing. On March 21, 2007 there was an exchange between
Representative Adam Schiff and Secretary Rice during a hearing before
the Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and
Related Programs. Secretary Rice repeatedly refused to state that
the murder of 1.5 million Armenians between 1915 and 1923 by Turkey
was genocide.

Mr. Schiff asked Rice: ?Do you have any doubt in your mind, that the
murder of 1.5 million Armenians between 1915 and 1923 constituted
genocide? Is there any doubt about that in your mind?? Rice responded
with the standard State Department response: ?Congressman, I think
these historical circumstances require a very detailed and sober look
from historians and what we?ve encouraged the Turks and the Armenians
to do is to have joint historical commissions that can look at this,
to have efforts to examine their past and, in examining their past,
to get over their past?.?

Mr. Schiff then asked: ?Is there any historic debate outside of
Turkey? Is there any reputable historian you?re aware of that
takes issue with the fact that the murder of 1.5 million Armenians
constituted genocide??

Secretary Rice again refused to directly answer this and several
other questions and gave the evasive State Department position.

The French Parliament last year passed a law stating that denial of
the Armenian Genocide would be a crime. The French Parliament did
not give in to the Turkish threats of economic retaliation and stood
tall. The U.S. should do the same.

Time Magazine

In the June 6, 2005 issue of its European edition, Time Magazine ran
a four-page advertisement, placed by the Ankara Chamber of Commerce,
promoting tourism in Turkey, together with a DVD which contained a
70-minute segment that completely denied the Armenian Genocide and
distorted the facts. The DVD also contained numerous false allegations
against the Armenian people.

Following protests by Armenian National Committee branches worldwide,
Time Magazine published in its October 17, 2005 European edition a
letter to the editors of Time-Europe by leading French, Armenian,
Jewish and human rights organizations. The publication was required
by France?s ?right to reply? laws for those unfairly attacked in
its pages.

Time also ran a brief apology alongside the letter stating: ?Time
regrets distributing the dvd and we are very sorry for the offense
it has caused. The so-called documentary portion of the dvd presents
a one-sided view of history that does not meet our standards for
fairness and accuracy, and we would not have distributed it had we
been aware of its content. Unfortunately the dvd was not adequately
reviewed by anyone at Time because it was believed to be a benign
promotion piece. We have since changed our review process so as to
guarantee more vigilance in future. We apologize to the Armenian
community and to our readers.?

In December 2005 the French organizations together with the
Switzerland-Armenia Association (SAA), the French Association of
Armenian Lawyers and Jurists (AFAJA), the European Armenian Federation
for Justice and Democracy (EAFJD) and the California Courier newspaper
?reached an amicable agreement with Time executives ensuring the
facts of the Armenian Genocide are not distorted again in the pages
of the magazine.?

Thereafter, Michael Elliot, editor of Time International stated in
a letter to California Courier publisher Harut Sassounian: ?Please
be advised that, in common with other leading news organizations, it
is Time?s policy and practice to refer to the Armenian genocide as a
historical fact. Accordingly, I will be informing our correspondents
and editors that the term ?Armenian genocide? should be used without
qualification.?

And most recently and by continued effort of Armenian organizations
and non-Armenian organizations, Time Magazine in its February 12,
2007 European edition carried a full page factual announcement on
the Armenian Genocide, together with a complimentary dvd in English
and French ?which contains a compelling 52 minute documentary on
the Armenian genocide by French director Laurence Jourdan? and ?a 46
minute interview with Dr. Yves Temon, a leading expert on the Armenian
Genocide.? The full-page statement and the dvd were provided free of
charge by Time Europe (circulation 550,000).

Aram Hamparian, Executive Director of the Armenian National Committee
of America (ANCA) said ?We welcome Time Magazine?s judgment that ? in
the interest of its readers? right to accurate reporting- the Armenian
Genocide should be reported as a fact, without qualification. This
announcement by Time, along with similar policy statements by the New
York Times, the Boston Globe, and many other leading publications,
only increases the pressure on the administration to abandon its
morally bankrupt complicity in the Turkish government?s denial of
its crime against the Armenian nation.?

The above actions by Armenian and non-Armenian organizations
demonstrate that actions by groups, their individual members and by
citizens at large do have an impact.

I urge our many Greek American organizations, their members and Greek
Americans at large to support our fellow Armenian American citizens
with political action. Specifically, I urge them to contact Speaker
Pelosi and their own Representative and two Senators and urge their
full support of H. Res. 106 and S. Res. 106 and particularly urge
them in the interests of the U.S. to have a vote on these resolutions.

It is easy to call your Representative and two Senators by dialing
the central Capital switchboard telephone number 202-224-3121 and
ask for your Representative and Senators. Also make sure to write them.

The addresses for letters to House and Senate members are:

The Honorable ___________

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, D.C. 20515

The Honorable ____________

U.S. Senate

Washington, D.C. 20510

They should also contact Secretaries Rice and Gates and express
disappointment and disagreement with their basically denialist position
on the Armenian Genocide.

The address for Secretary Rice is:

U.S. Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520

Main Switchboard: 202-647-4000

The address for Secretary Gates is:

Secretary of Defense 1000 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-1000

Finally, call and write to President George W. Bush and urge him to
support the Armenian Genocide resolutions.

To call the President:

Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414

To write to the President:

President George W. Bush

The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500

Please take action- it can help.

Gene Rossides is President of the American Hellenic Institute and
former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury

l?newsid=6657&lang=US

http://www.hellenicnews.com/readnews.htm

Could Digging Up This General In A Lead-Lined Coffin Save The World?

COULD DIGGING UP THIS GENERAL IN A LEAD-LINED COFFIN SAVE THE WORLD?
By Michael Hanlon

DAILY MAIL (London)
April 11, 2007 Wednesday

MANY people live extraordinary lives. Many have extraordinary deaths.

But very, very few can hope to save the world 90 years after they
have passed away.

One such man was the remarkably colourful Sir Tatton Benvenuto Mark
Sykes, one of those larger-than-life Victorians who lived in an era
when great men really could, and did, change the shape of the world.

Sir Mark Sykes was a baronet, a diplomat, a father of six children,
Tory MP, a senior general in the Army and a skilled negotiator. A
close friend of T.E. Lawrence (of Arabia) and Chaim Weizmann —
who went on to become the first President of Israel — Sir Mark
championed Zionism, was a friend of the Arabs and had a real passion
for all things that were Turkish.

His commanding achievement in life was when, aged just 39, he skilfully
directed the carve-up of the defunct Ottoman Empire after the World
War I armistice in 1918 — representing the British government at
the Paris Peace Conference.

It was his hand which drew the arrowstraight lines that criss-cross
the deserts of Arabia to this day, delineating frontiers. Sykes is
also credited with helping to create the modern state of Israel,
as well as championing the causes of the Armenians.

But it was his death that was to bring Sir Mark what may be his
longest-lived legacy. In an extraordinary development, it is now
thought that this eccentric genius may hold the key — 88 years after
he died — to averting what many scientists believe is the biggest
medical threat facing the world today: a bird-flu pandemic.

During the Paris peace talks, which led to the Sykes-Picot Agreement,
Sir Mark contracted a nasty fever, from which he died, at the Hotel
Lotti in Paris, on February 16, 1919.

In fact, Sir Mark may have been one of the very last victims of the
terrible epidemic which had swept the world for more than two years,
the so-called Spanish Flu. This pandemic killed far more than were
slaughtered in the Great War.

Sir Mark would have been just one of the 50 million or so whose lives
prematurely ended (and so often in their prime; the flu struck mostly
those in their middle years), but for one thing.

After his death, the remains of Sir Mark were buried in a leadlined
coffin. This was a standard, if expensive, protocol for bringing
bodies back from abroad. He was buried in St Mary’s Church, Sledmere,
in Yorkshire, and slowly passed into history.

BUT thanks to his leadlined coffin, scientists believe that there is
a good chance Sir Mark’s body will have been extremely well-preserved.

A team led by Professor John Oxford, renowned virologist at Queen Mary
University of London, and one of the world’s leading experts on bird
flu, has applied for permission to exhume Sir Mark’s body in the hope
that they will be able to extract samples of the virus that killed him.

‘We have permission from the relatives. We have permission from the
bishop,’ Professor Oxford says. ‘All we need now is permission from
the Home Office and from the Health & Safety Executive. We hope to
start work in six months.’

It is thought that if permission is given — which looks likely —
it will be the first time a body has been exhumed after so long for
medical research purposes.

The body of Sir Mark’s wife, Edith, is buried in the same grave,
although her remains will not be disturbed.

The plan to exhume Sir Mark’s body is more than a gruesome academic
exercise. It is now

known that the Spanish Flu which swept the world just as the flames
of World War I were dying was an avian influenza — one of the viruses
so worrying to the world’s health chiefs today.

By isolating and examining any viruses still present in the body,
Professor Oxford’s team hope to learn more about the workings of
this virus, named H1N1, and how it may be genetically related to the
current bird flu germ, H5N1, which has been terrifying the world in
recent years.

‘He died very late in the epidemic, when the virus had almost burnt
itself out,’ Prof Oxford adds. ‘We want to get a grip on how the
virus worked both when it was at its most virulent and when it was
coming to the end of its life.’

Considering the 1918 pandemic was the most destructive plague in modern
times, we know little about the workings of the virus that caused it.

There are some poor-quality samples of the virus in labs, some
extracted from the tissues of bodies found in the Greenland tundra
a few years ago. It is hoped that Sir Mark’s remains will massively
increase the amount of pristine material for the scientists to work on.

It is probably only a matter of time, Professor Oxford and most
virus experts believe, before the current avian flu virus, H5N1,
or one of its relatives mutates into a form that is both virulent
and transmissible between human beings.

One thing we know about the 1918 epidemic is that it had nothing to do
with Spain. Instead, it probably arose in the misery and deprivation
of the War, either among American servicemen or in northern France.

Some scientists believe the flu began in the fishing town of Etaples,
on the French Channel coast. There, a huge camp received injured
soldiers from the front.

In fact, some epidemiologists even claim to have identified the
first victim of the pandemic, a Tommy from New Malden, called Harry
Underwood. He had been gassed and shot, before being transferred
to Etaples to recuperate. Thousands of men lived there in cramped,
unhygienic conditions ripe for an epidemic.

Crucially, Etaples lies directly under one of the world’s greatest
bird migration routes, and it is known that the recovering soldiers and
medics shot thousands of possibly bird-flu-infected wildfowl for food.

ONE OF Sir Mark’s descendents is his great-granddaughter, the author
Plum Sykes. ‘It is rather grisly, but it is a great story,’ she says.

‘It is such a shame he died so young. People said he could have gone
on to great things.

‘He was a modest man, but I think he would have been very proud if
he’d known what an amazing thing he could achieve after his death.’

Whether the scientists are successful will depend on the state of
the body. Certainly, cadavers buried in lead coffins can be well
preserved. Some, after two centuries, have looked almost as fresh as
the day they were buried.

It is supposed that a combination of hermetic sealing and the action of
lead compounds from the coffin itself cause the action of putrefaction
to slow.

When the coffin is opened, full safety procedures will be in place,
including the wearing of isolation suits. Nevertheless, surely there
is still a chance that the plague which caused so much death and
destruction in 1918 could escape to do the same thing again?

‘There is no risk,’ Prof Oxford says. ‘The virus will be dead. I’ve
got children and grandchildren. I wouldn’t do this if it were exposing
them to that sort of risk.’

If Prof Oxford is right, then thanks to the late Sir Mark Sykes
science will soon know more about one of the biggest killers of the
20th Century. A fitting end to a very extraordinary life — even if
it occurs nearly 90 years after it came to such a premature close.

While Partners Are In High Demand: Russia’s Military-Technical Coope

WHILE PARTNERS ARE IN HIGH DEMAND:
RUSSIA’S MILITARY-TECHNICAL COOPERATION WITH CIS COUNTRIES IS PLAYING AN EVER INCREASING ROLE IN THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
by: Vladimir Semenchenko

Source: Voyenno-Promyshlenny Kurier, No 13, April 4 – 10, 2007, p. 2
Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
April 11, 2007 Wednesday

The Shape And Prospects Of Military-Technical Cooperation In The Commonwealth;
Analysis of military-technical cooperation in the Commonwealth.

The Russian military-industrial complex is playing a major role in the
maintenance of the defense capability of the country and as a supplier
of military hardware to CIS states and distant foreign countries. As
a matter of fact, the military-technical cooperation is attaining
additional importance within the framework of international relations.

Russia’s military-technical cooperation with CIS countries is
particularly close.

Some experts say that without the cooperation of CIS countries,
Russia will be able to produce only 17% of what military hardware
and double purpose products it is currently making. In fact, this
is the best parameter in all of the Commonwealth. The preservation
and advancement of military-technical contacts with CIS countries is
therefore the best optimal solution.

Its Nagorno-Karabakh problem unsolved, Armenia is doing what it can
to advance its defense capabilities. Unfortunately for Yerevan, the
capacities of the practically nonexistent national military-industrial
complex and budget are quite limited. The role played by Russia
therefore cannot be overestimated. Armenia procures all military
hardware from Russia. The term "outsorting" applies here, the practice
of leaving fringe functions to another organization. The Armenian
military-industrial complex has been receiving Russian contracts
since 2006. In fact, all these exercises were turned over to Russia
completely, as payment for the Armenian state debt.

Military-technical cooperation between Russia and Uzbekistan entered
a new phase on November 14, 2005, with the signing of the Treaty
on Relations of Allies. Article 10 of the Treaty states that
"the signatories pledge to actively interact in modernization
and reorganization of the armed forces and their rearmament with
modern hardware." According to official estimates, the Russian-Uzbek
military-technical cooperation amounted to dozens millions dollars by
2006. Russia is selling this former Soviet republic weapons, aircraft,
antiaircraft means, munitions, and spares. When Prime Minister Mikhail
Fradkov visited Uzbekistan in March 2007, Moscow and Tashkent agreed
to establish Uzrosavia, a joint venture where the Russian share in
the registered capital was to amount to at least 51%.

Azerbaijan established the Defense Industry Ministry. Its plans
include the production of light weapons and light artillery pieces.

Where it intends to find the personnel, however, remains to be seen.

The Azerbaijani regular army is using Russian military hardware
nowadays, which means services by the Russian military-industrial
complex. This country in the meantime is building up its military
potential and making an emphasis on NATO hardware. Negotiations are
under way with the United States over three patrol ships and the
construction of radars on the territory of Azerbaijan. In any case,
Azerbaijan remains a staunch promoter of a well-balanced policy with
regard to Russia, Iran, and the United States. The Azerbaijani-Russian
military-technical cooperation will probably remain unchanged.

Military-technical cooperation with Kyrgyzstan is in a decline.

Russia has been losing political clout with the region in general
and military-economic influence along with it. Pro-American moods
are taking root in Central Asia. The situation with Tajikistan is
more or less similar but will hopefully clarify soon.

The Ukraine’s position is somewhat controversial. The country of a
colossal scientific potential, envious geopolitical location, and a
broad spectrum of international contacts is at a loss over the choice
of political priorities. Some Ukrainian leaders would like to see
their country in NATO. What will it mean for the national economy?

First, membership in NATO is expensive. It will certainly require
additional investments in production (approximately 246.45 million
grivnas). Second, all of the military hardware will have to be
converted to NATO standards. Third, membership in NATO will leave
the Ukraine in the position of Poland. A country with a modern and
advanced military-industrial complex, it has nothing it could offer
its NATO partners. Compelled to stick to NATO standards, Warsaw is
buying weapons and military hardware elsewhere. It paid $1.1 million
for 690 armored personnel carriers from Finland.

It is common knowledge that the United States tolerates no rivals in
the sphere of military hardware. The Ukraine is a fine example. Not
even a NATO country yet, it is forced to abandon a whole assortment
of weapons including portable antiaircraft complexes like Strela-2
and others that are much more effective than the American Stingers.

In December 2005, Sergei Ivanov, Russian Defense Minister,
announced in no uncertain terms that entry into NATO would mean the
severance of industrial cooperation between Russian and Ukrainian
military-industrial complexes. Their existing symbiosis nowadays
is what keeps Ukraine on the list of five worldwide largest arms
exporters. Let Kiev think this over.

According to political scientists (including Stanislav Belkovsky),
all of that indicates that Ukraine cannot hope to create its
own military-industrial complex geared for NATO standards in the
foreseeable future and that cooperation with Russia will therefore
survive. And yet, Russia is gradually curtailing its economic contacts
with the Ukrainian military-industrial complex. Last May, Russia even
withdrew from the joint Russian-Ukrainian AN-70 project.

It is proof that Ukraine had better think twice.

Despite the somewhat souring political relations between Moscow
and Minsk, military-technical cooperation with Belarus is quite
impressive. Two regiments of S-300PS antiaircraft complexes were
delivered to Belarus in April 2006 within the framework of the joint
Russian-Belarussian antiaircraft defense system. The complexes will be
deployed in the western part of the republic. It will make the killing
zone 150 kilometers wider. Where Russia is concerned, deliveries of
the antiaircraft complexes offer an additional entry into the national
economy and better airspace security. As for Belarus, Minsk provides
Liga-S combined sights for PT-76 floating tanks modernized in Moscow
(by Special Mechanic Engineering and Metallurgy).

The state of affairs with military-technical cooperation with
Kazakhstan is fine too. Its regular army is using military hardware of
Soviet vintage as well as what is being bought from Russia nowadays. In
the meantime, Kazakhstan itself is in the position to offer to the
Third World somewhat outdated Soviet military hardware – aircraft,
helicopters, tanks, light weapons, haulers, and jammers. In other
words, it is a potential rival of Russia in the sphere of arms
export. Even worse, this export may mount tension in the already
problematic region.

Kazakhstan’s potential in the sphere of military hardware production
is quite impressive, particularly where Naval gear is concerned. This
particular segment is of particular interest to Russia. The Gidromash
factory in Alma-Ata makes APR-3 ASW missiles, Kuibyshev factory in
Petropavlovsk produces antiship mines (MTPK-2, Langust-Schuka, and
Krechet), Mechanical Engineering in Alma-Ata 65-75A torpedoes, Zenith
in Uralsk trawls and mine-seekers, Kirov factory in Petropavlovsk
radios for the Navy and Strategic Missile Forces… It may be mentioned
here that Naval gear accounts for a substantial part of arms export
from Russia. Kazakh enterprises are running at 25-30% their capacities
nowadays, and placement of Russian contracts there will benefit both
countries handsomely. Hence the conclusion: joint Russian-Kazakh work
on weapons and military hardware for their own safety and export is
better than rivalry in the world market in the sphere of sales of
outdated Soviet military hardware. Fradkov confirmed it on his visit
to Kazakhstan recently. Moscow and Astana agreed to activate the work
and prepare a number of accords for the signing by presidents.

Countries of the CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization may
retain the existing economic ties and establish new ones in weapons
and military hardware design and development. It stands to reason to
expect that military hardware will soon be mutually produced. It will
ease the financial burden on every individual participant, allow for
mass production, and facilitate export capacities.

Maintenance (the availability of spare parts) of the weapons and
military hardware is another problem. The matter concerns the gear
still produced in some nearby foreign countries or that of Soviet
vintage. The construction of new factories to produce spare parts
for the weapons that will be hopelessly outmoded in 5-10 years is of
course inexpedient. The preservation of the existing economic ties
is therefore the answer, at least for the politically loyal countries.

Belarus and Kazakhstan will certainly remain partners in the
foreseeable future.

In other words, an analysis of the shape and prospects of
military-technical cooperation in the Commonwealth in the near
future leads to the conclusion that Russia – potentially – remains
the nucleus of CIS military-industrial complex.

From The Biography Of Acting Defense Minister Of Armenia Mikhail Aru

FROM THE BIOGRAPHY OF ACTING DEFENSE MINISTER OF ARMENIA MIKHAIL ARUTYUNYAN
Translated by Pavel Pushkin

Source: Krasnaya Zvezda, April 07, 2007, p. 3
Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
April 11, 2007 Wednesday

Colonel General Mikhail Arutyunyan, chief of the main staff of the
armed forces and Senior Deputy Defense Minister of Armenia, became
acting Defense Minister of the republic. Former Defense Minister
Serzh Sarkisyan was appointed as Prime Minister of Armenia.

Arutyunyan was born on February 10 of 1946 in Sagiyan village of the
Shemakha District of the Azerbaijani Soviet Socialist Republic. In
1967, Arutyunyan graduated from the Baku higher military combined-arms
command school. In 1976, he graduated from the intelligence department
of the Military Academy named after Frunze.

In 1988, he graduated from the Military Academy of the General Staff
of the Armed Forces of the USSR.

During his service in the Soviet Armed Forces, he served on the posts
of platoon commander, company commander, chief of staff of a mechanized
infantry division, head of a department of the staff of an army corps,
deputy chief of staff of an army, senior lecturer of the intelligence
department of the Military Academy of the General Staff of the Armed
Forces of the USSR.

In 1992, Arutyunyan was appointed as senior deputy chief of the main
staff of the armed forces of Armenia and director of the operational
department. Between 1992 and 1994, he was senior deputy chief of the
main staff of the armed forces of Armenia.

In 1994, he was appointed chief of the main staff of the armed forces
and Senior Deputy Defense Minister of Armenia.

UN Removes Genocide Exhibit After Turkey Complains

UN REMOVES GENOCIDE EXHIBIT AFTER TURKEY COMPLAINS
by Warren Hoge – The New York Times Media Group

The International Herald Tribune, France
April 11, 2007 Wednesday

The United Nations dismantled an exhibit on the Rwandan genocide
and postponed its scheduled opening by the UN secretary general,
Ban Ki Moon, after the Turkish mission objected to references to the
Armenian genocide in Turkey at the time of World War I.

The panels of graphics, photos and statements had been installed
in the visitors’ lobby Thursday by the Aegis Trust, of Britain. The
trust campaigns for the prevention of genocide and runs a center in
Kigali, the Rwandan capital, memorializing the 500,000 victims of
the massacres there 13 years ago.

Hours after the show was assembled, however, a Turkish diplomat raised
objections to words in a section titled "What is genocide?"

The passage said that "following World War I, during which one million
Armenians were murdered in Turkey," Raphael Lemkin, a Polish lawyer
credited with coining the word genocide, "urged the League of Nations
to recognize crimes of barbarity as international crimes."

James Smith, the chief executive of Aegis, said he was told by
the United Nations on Saturday that the sentence would have to be
eliminated or the exhibition would be struck.

Armen Martirosyan, the Armenian ambassador to the UN, said he had
sought out Kiyotaka Akasaka, the UN under secretary general for public
information, and thought he had reached an agreement to let the show
go forward by omitting the words "in Turkey."

But Akasaka said, "That was his suggestion, and I agreed only to take
it into account in finding the final wording."

Baki Ilkin, the Turkish ambassador to the UN, said, "We just expressed
our discomfort over the text’s making references to the Armenian
issue and drawing parallels with the genocide in Rwanda."

There were widespread killings of Armenians by Ottoman Turks, beginning
in 1915, in which an estimated 1.5 million died, but Turkey has always
vehemently rejected claims of genocide.

Smith said he was "very disappointed because this was supposed to
talk about the lessons drawn from Rwanda and point up that what is
happening in Darfur is the cost of inaction."

Russian First Dep Premier To Meet With Armenia’s Leadership

RUSSIAN FIRST DEP PREMIER TO MEET WITH ARMENIA’S LEADERSHIP

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
April 10, 2007 Tuesday 06:54 PM EST

Russian First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov on Wednesday will
visit the Yerevan school for children of Russian servicemen, located
in the northern part of the city, where Russian troops have billeted
since 1827.

Ivanov arrived on a two-day working visit to Yerevan on Tuesday.

"We plan discussing matters of investment cooperation, nuclear
energy, the implementation of gas and energy accords with President
Robert Kocharian and Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisian. We shall make a
special emphasis on the transport infrastructure, in particular the
Caucasus-Poti ferry service," Ivanov said at the government’s meeting
in the Kremlin on Monday.

He said that a new ferry was recently bought that would be put in
service soon.

"At last we shall establish a regular and extensive transport
connection with Armenia," Ivanov said.

"We also plan discussing questions of military technical cooperation,"
he added.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, reporting the results of
his visit to Yerevan last week, said that the Armenian authorities
had welcomed Russia’s decision to take part in the monitoring of
parliamentary elections in Armenia.

Lavrov said he had had a meeting with President Robert Kocharian.

"He is very much pleased with the way the agreements, reached early
this year are being fulfilled, including those dealing with trade and
economic cooperation, as well as with the directions of political
cooperation, specifically within the framework of CIS and of the
Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO)," Lavrov said.

According to Lavrov, he coordinated with Armenian officials during
the visit preparations for a meeting of the CIS Council of Foreign
Ministers, due to be held in Astana this month.