BAKU: Appeal Against Court Sentence For Azerbaijani Officer Raised

APPEAL AGAINST COURT SENTENCE FOR AZERBAIJANI OFFICER RAISED

Trend News Agency, Azerbaijan
April 11 2007

Azerbaijan, Baku / Ò corr K. Zarbaliyeva / The sentence and the
verdict of the Court of Appeal were announced to the attorney of
an Azerbaijani Armed Forces officer, Ramil Safarov, who had been
sentenced to life imprisonment by a Budapest Court on 13 April, 2006.

Attorney Ikram Shirinov, a member of the Safarovs and a representative
of the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense, reported on 10 April that
he had received translated forms of the verdict made by the Court
of Appeal on the case of an Armenian officer’s death and prison
supervisors.

Shirinnov noted that he had spoken to Safarov on 10 April. They
discussed the idea of an appeal. But they failed to complete the
discussion due to a network breakdown.

The attorney stated that he would study the decision of the Court of
Appeal dating back to 22 February 2007 within a week. The draft of
the appeal is ready. It will be sent to the court next month.

At the decision made by the Pesht District Court in 2006, Safarov
was condemned to an eight month suspended sentence. He was accused
of insubordination to supervisors of the investigation cell.

–Boundary_(ID_k3/r+ImXucBV8sgzwUOA8g)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

UN In Genocide Exhibition Controversy

UN IN GENOCIDE EXHIBITION CONTROVERSY

SABC News, South Africa
April 11 2007

The United Nations has been hit by a controversy after a photography
exhibition on the massacre of thousands of Rwandans in 1994 was
suspended. This after Turkey protested that it carried a mention of
the massacre of Armenians after World War I.

The exhibition was meant to open early this week to mark the 13th
anniversary of the Rwanda genocide. It was organised by a British
based Aegis Trust and approved by the UN secretariat.

On the day of the exhibition, with pictures on the wall and the UN
secretary-general already issued the copy of his speech, the event
was abruptly cancelled. The cancellation follows an objection by the
Turkish government about a reference in the exhibition to a genocide
in Turkey during the World War I.

Over a million Amernians were killed in what historians refer as the
first genocide of the 20th century. Turkey denies that the murders
constituted genocide saying that they resulted from civil war and
unrest. Turkey has been accused of denying and distorting history.

However the UN refuses to get involved.

Organisers express disappointment However, it has now emerged that
there is more to the cancellation than just the Turkish objections. The
UN secretariat has also made a blunder in allowing the exhibition. But
the question is, how did the exhibitors get to a point of hanging
pictures in the exhibition area of the world body and even have the
secretary-general of the organisation ready to bless the occasion
which has now been found to have skipped proper procedures?

The organisers of the exhibition have expressed disappointment
at its cancellation saying it undermines the values of the UN in
preventing genocide. The saga has refreshed memories and opened old
wounds about how the UN stood by and watched while the Tutsis and
Hutus were killing each other in a 100 day slaughter in Rwanda.

The UN security council gave a restrictive mandate at the time ordering
the UN not to get involved. The exhibition was scheduled to be at the
UN until next month and then go on a tour of Africa, including Rwanda,
Ghana, Senegal, South Africa and Tanzania.

rica/0,2172,146940,00.html

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.sabcnews.com/world/north_ame

Humiliation Of Muslims And The Coming Siege Of Vienna

HUMILIATION OF MUSLIMS AND THE COMING SIEGE OF VIENNA
Blake Gartner

Global Politician, NY
April 11 2007

The "Zionist entity" is at the forefront of the clash between the
West and Islam. And yet, it is a tiny country, less than half the
size and population of Netherlands. World Jewry stands at just 13
million people, so it has never been a titan in global affairs. The
two dominant world religions in a constant clash with each other
since the 7th century have been Islam and Christianity. Today the
battle continues – whether against the Taliban in the mountains of
Afghanistan or against the rioters on the streets of Paris.

When Napoleon marched on Egypt, defeating the Arabs with extreme ease,
Christendom seemingly won. The Ottoman Empire fell as a result of
WWI and the West forgot about the Islamic threat. But Muslims did
not. Muslims felt humiliated.

The only thing people dislike more than being attacked is being
ignored. The West ignored the Middle East, seeing it as an
uncultured backwater useful only for its oil resources. But to
Muslims, everything from the defeat to Napoleon to the dismantling
of the Caliphate by Ataturk is "humiliation". At times it seems like
"humiliation" is the Muslims’ favorite word. They do not lose wars –
they get humiliated. They do not suffer from economic stagnation –
they get humiliated. They do not compromise on a UN resolution – they
get humiliated. Reading Islamic press one sees the word "humiliation"
with spectacular frequency.

What Muslims claim to want is "respect". But what is respect? The
Islamic vision of "respect" is to be the dominant global power. It is
to have the military power, the economic wealth and the international
prestige to get what they want, whenever they want. Any compromise
in any forum is immediately condemned as "humiliation" due to their
weakness – a humiliation that naturally should be countered by pressing
their political and military muscle.

But Islam was indeed a dominant power for much of its history. Today
it is hard to imagine Morocco defeating Spain, Tunisia conquering
Italy and Turkey marching up to Vienna, but it did happen in the
past. Muslims were the dominant power in the world for many centuries,
and it is that "Golden Age" that today’s generation, whether Islamists
or Nationalists, seek to re-capture.

The first millennium of its existence was an almost unmitigated success
for Islam. From its roots in the Arabian peninsula, it first spread its
wings to Egypt, Syria, Palestine, and North Africa – all of which were
then part of the Christian world, culturally closer to the West than
to the Arab states we see there today. Armenians, during the war of
640-652, were among the few able to stop the onrush of Islamic forces,
preserving Armenia and Georgia as Christian nations to this day.

With the Middle East under their control, Muslims proceeded to take
over Spain, Portugal, Sicily, and much of France, reaching 2/3 of the
way to Paris. In the first half of the 9th century, Rome and most of
what is now Italy fell to the newly dominant Religion of Submission
(islam means "submission").

Before the rise of water travel enabling countries along the Atlantic
Ocean, (England, Spain, Portugal, Holland, France) to set up empires,
the dominant military and economic powers were located in southern
Europe and Middle East – that being the trades routes where people
exchanged not only goods, but information and ideas. Northern and
western Europe was mired in what are commonly known as the Dark Ages.

These were not the powers that could stop the Islamic invasion.

The ever-shrinking Byzantine Empire struck back in the 840’s, but its
limited successes were soon turned back as Muslims sacked Messina in
842, Enna in 859, Syracuse in 878, Catania in 900.

In 904, Thessalonica, the second-largest Byzantine city, was taken
over by Arabs from Tunisia. Seven years later, the Byzantines suffered
another embarrassing defeat in Crete.

After a brief respite, Muslims sensed another opportunity to spread
their religion and civilization to the "darkness of barbarism and
unbelief", when the Byzantine rulers decided to disband most of their
military, preferring to pay mercenaries when troubles arouse. The
Byzantine army consisted largely of the elderly officers and untrained
young kids (for centuries after its destruction, the word "Byzantine"
was used to mean "effeminate decadence").

Faced with the decaying of what was arguably the only stable, viable
state in Europe, the West was again on the brink of annihilation. In
1095, Pope Urban II hoped to organize Christendom around a fight for
Jerusalem, a tactic frequently used before and after by Muslims. But
the first military engagement failed miserably, as the Turks
slaughtered almost every man sent into battle. The second battle was
much more successful and some of the lands previously lost to Muslims
were recovered.

The Crusaders established the Kingdom of Jerusalem in 1099. At
its height, the Crusader Kingdom was about the size of Israel and
West Bank. For more than a hundred years, Muslims could do little
about the new country, fighting occasional wars, mostly to contain
the Christians. But in the 12th century, a Jihad on Jerusalem was
organized. In 1187, settlers lost Jerusalem – it was now the Kingdom
of Jerusalem… without Jerusalem. A small strip of land along the
seaside of what is now Israel and the southern half of Lebanon was all
that remained. Subsequent Crusades recovered Jerusalem, but all was
lost when Sultan Khalil captured Acre, the new capital of the Kingdom,
and proceeded to either slaughter or enslave all remaining settlers.

The Crusades were a failure. Islam won, forever reinforcing its sense
of invincibility against the infidels. I’ve heard many Muslims say,
"It took us 200 years to defeat the Crusader Kingdom. Israel has
existed less than 60. We have another 140 to destroy it, and we will."

But Islam did not stop at the defeat of the Crusader Kingdom. In
the 15th century, the Turks finally destroyed the Byzantine Empire,
conquering its capital Constantinople.

At the other end of Europe, much of Spain and Portugal was under
Islamic rule for 781 years until 1492. Faced with Arab Muslims
threatening from the West and Turkish Muslims threatening from the
East, Europe struck back with a vengeance again. Spain and Portugal
were won back, pushing Islam back into North Africa. But just like
the first time when the West responded to Islamic aggression with
violent Crusades, the new European attempt to defend itself and even
the genocidal Inquisition fell short of taking back everything that
was lost. Constantinople remained part of the Islamic world.

In 1526, Sultan Suleiman conquered most of Hungary, with Bulgaria
already under his control. Three years later, the Turks reached all
the way to Vienna and laid siege to it. The city stood up only because
it was attacked too late by a Turkish force that was too tired from
prior battles. In 1532, the Ottomans tried again, but faced stiff
resistance in western Hungary.

For 150 years, the Ottomans tried to jump from southeastern Europe
into its heartland before the epic Battle of Vienna. This time,
the siege began in July of 1683. During the siege, 10,000 Viennese
troops were surrounded by 140,000 Turks. They would probably fail,
and allow Islam into the center of Europe, but King Jan III Sobieski
of Poland sent a 30,000 man army to protect the city, possibly saving
the Western civilization. The Battle of Vienna began on September 11.

When the battle was over next day, 4,000 Christians had been killed –
and 15,000 Muslims. Vienna survived again.

The rest is history. The Enlightenment and later the Industrial
Revolution sent the West far ahead of Islam. In the 19th century,
Napoleon showed just show dominant Christendom was over Islam. The
Caliphate was eliminated when the Ottoman Empire ceased to exist. The
West stopped fearing Muslims, viewing them as nothing more than
"oil cows". And Islam truly ceased being a power.

That, of course, is what the West wanted to believe. Truth is that
Christendom still didn’t recover most of the territories lost since
the rise of Islam. Constantinople (now Istanbul), Egypt, Syria,
Bosnia and Chechnya were all Christian lands in the past.

Islam did not invade the West continuously for a thousand years.

Instead, there were many generations of peace, but that peace was
eventually always interrupted by Muslim attacks on Europe. Each time
Christians lost large parts of their territory, then fought back,
but never fully recovered the lost territories.

For two centuries now, the West was strong enough to ignore the threat
from the south. But Muslims felt "humiliated" because they did not
have the strongest army, the wealthiest economy and the dominant
political power.

Islam began to resurge in the 1960s (some say in the 1920s, but
Islamists weren’t strong enough until after Israel "humiliated"
Arab nationalists in 1967). First came terror. Then global Jihad. In
the 1990s, massive Islamic immigration into Europe began to threaten
a demographic takeover. Islam is on the move again. Will Vienna be
under siege once more?

ID=2619&cid=3&sid=9

http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?

ANKARA: Upcoming April 14 Rally Marked By ‘Unofficial’ Involvement B

UPCOMING APRIL 14 RALLY MARKED BY ‘UNOFFICIAL’ INVOLVEMENT BY CHP
HabÝb Guler Ankara

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
April 11 2007

Despite announcements from the main opposition Republican People’s
Party (CHP) that it has not been involved in helping to organize the
upcoming April 14 "Cankaya Rally" sponsored by the Ataturk Thought
Association (ADD), serious efforts are being made by the ADD to
encourage participation by CHP members.

While CHP leader Deniz Baykal has opted to take a decidedly background
role in the organization of the Cankaya Rally, Baykal’s first cousin
CHP Denizli deputy Mehmet Uður Neþþar has sent out 23,000 invitations
to the rally. Neþþar, who has reiterated the close ties between the
ADD and the CHP, sent out the invitations to the Cankaya Rally through
90 Internet groups.

The CHP leadership is denying allegations such as those leveled by
Justice and Development Party (AK Party) parliamentary group chairman
Salih Kapusuz that "the CHP is involved as a shield for the ADD."

Instead, while underlining that they are not part of the "anti-AK
Party member becoming president" meeting, the CHP has said openly
that any of their party members who wish should participate.

At the same time, Neþþar sent out an e-mail invitation to thousands of
CHP members titled "Don’t let your children ask you ‘Why weren’t you
there?’" The letter sent out by Neþþar also contained these lines:
"I will march on April 14 at 11.00 in Tandoðan Square, in Ataturk’s
memory. I will do my national duty to save this country from the
approaching nightmare. What are you going to do? Are you going to be
able to say to your grandchildren with pride, years from now, ‘Yes,
I was there.’ Or will you have to bow your head downwhen your children
ask you later ‘Why weren’t you there?’ I am aware of the danger, and
thus I choose to be in Tandoðan Square on April 14. I await you there."

Neþþar, commenting on the e-mail invitation, which went out to
an estimated 23,000, said it called on everyone to be aware and
sensitive to the matters at hand. Neþþar also noted that the CHP had
elected not to participate on an official, institutional level so
as not to give the meeting a "political image." Despite this though,
many CHP deputies and party members are in fact planning on attending
the ADD meeting. Underscoring the ties between the ADD and the CHP,
Neþþar noted that the current head of the ADD in Denizli is a former
CHP executive.

While the ADD is hoping to involve university students in the
upcoming Ankara protest, voices from within the ranks of the ADD are
already rising in protest at some of the methods being used by the
ADD leadership. ADD Þanlýurfa President Sadettin Gursoz said that
he had received faxes from ADD headquarters urging him to support
participation by local university students in the April 14 protests.

Gursoz, however, said that in principle, he was opposed to any such
"encouraged" inclusion and that participation in the meeting had to be
entirely voluntary. Gursoz also noted that while students from Harran
University could attend the Ankara meeting on an individual basis, no
one would be pressed into going. Gursoz also underlined that, as with
Inonu University in Malatya, university vehicles would not be used to
bring the students to Ankara on the day of the protest rally. Said
Gursoz, "There might be some who want to criticize this situation,
but it is just not right for universities to take part in this."

Meanwhile, parties representing socialist and communist stances in the
Turkish political spectrum have also announced that they will not be
at the ADD’s upcoming Cankaya Rally. The Freedom and Solidarity Party
(ODP), the Turkish Communist Party (TKP) and the Labor Party (EMEP)
have all said they will not be in Ankara for the protest. Only the
leftist Workers’ Party (IP) is officially supporting the protest,
though it has expressed reservations about what it characterizes as
gaps in the philosophy backing the rally. Also, any IP participation
on April 14 will take place without IP leader Doðu Perincek, who
will be in Paris on the same day attending a protest against Armenian
allegations of genocide.

–Boundary_(ID_OhbE5f3sdpnP2O7tRCpuHg)- –

ANKARA: Data Shows Increased Radioactive Leakage From Metsamor

DATA SHOWS INCREASED RADIOACTIVE LEAKAGE FROM METSAMOR
Ercan Yavuz Ankara

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
April 11 2007

Turkey has turned to the international community once again to pressure
neighboring Armenia to close down a decrepit nuclear power plant
after data collected in border areas revealed increased radioactive
spillage from the plant.

In a letter to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Ankara
demanded action and stronger international pressure on Armenia to shut
the old-fashioned Metsamor nuclear power plant. The plant was built
in the 1970s, but the technology installed at that time is no longer
acceptable by modern safety standards. It was closed due to a 1988
earthquake in Armenia, but the Armenian government decided to reopen
the damaged plant in 1993, citing an energy shortage in the country.

According to the data which the Turkish Atomic Energy Agency (TAEK)
gathered from 13 early warning stations established in Iðdýr and
nearby Kars province, there is an increase in radioactive leakage in
the region, which the TAEK attributes to the Metsamor plant.

The plant does not have an external dome to contain radioactive
leakage and its cooling water is insufficient, and as its technology
is outdated and it is located in an earthquake zone, all these factors
makes it a perfect candidate for a second Chernobyl-type incident.

Moreover, the plant is located just 19 kilometers from Iðdýr and 40
from Yerevan, in clear violation of internationally accepted standards
that require nuclear power plants to be at least 90 kilometers away
from human settlements.

Another concern which Turkey has with respect to the plant is that
the nuclear fuel which Armenia buys from Russia is transported by
air. Russian-made Antonov and Tapolov airplanes, both of which have
a record of frequent crashes, are used to transport nuclear fuel
to Armenia.

Noting the dangers the plant poses, Turkey requested that the EU urge
Armenia to close the plant in 2005. Following investigations conducted
by an EU delegation, the EU requested Armenia shut down the plant.

In 1999, the EU sent a delegation to Yerevan to conduct on-the-spot
examinations in the plant. Simultaneous probes by the IAEA concluded
that the plant should immediately be shut down. Before becoming a
member of the European Council on Jan. 25, 2001, Arme-nia pledged to
close the plant by 2004. In return the EU would reimburse Armenia’s
losses up to 100 million euros. Armenia found the EU’s proposal
insufficient and requested 1 billion euros instead. Later the EU
increased its pressure and Armenia declared that it would not close
the plant.

In the face of escalating international pressure Armenia has
transferred part of the plant’s shares to Russia. Russian Industry,
Science and Technology Minister Ilia Klebanov had declared that
the transfer did not include property rights, but rather that the
financial responsibility of Metsamor was given to Russia.

Some claimed that Russian Electric Systems seized Metsamor’s shares
due to Armenia’s default with respect to the overdue payments for
$40 million worth of enriched uranium purchased from Russia. Analysts
say that Armenia’s move served to relieve international pressure on it.

–Boundary_(ID_DpJGjYth3YsV013uI78cew)–

ANKARA: Freedom Of Expression Debate With EU Looming

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION DEBATE WITH EU LOOMING
EmÝne Kart Ankara

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
April 11 2007

A draft framework decision by EU term president Germany and Justice
Minister Cemil Cicek’s approach toward the issue of freedom of
speech is likely to spark a new verbal sparring match between the EU
candidate country and the bloc, with a disagreement between the two
sides over what should be legally protected within the framework of
freedom of expression.

Ankara has been concerned that the draft introducing punishment for
denial of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity could be
used to silence debate about Armenian claims of genocide at the hands
of the Ottoman Empire and these concerns have already been conveyed
to the German government both during last month’s talks in Berlin
between Cicek and his German counterpart, Brigitte Zypries, as well
as during talks between Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul and his German
counterpart, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, which also took place in Berlin
earlier this month.

The draft would bring up to three years of imprisonment for those who
deny "genocides and war crimes committed against humanity." According
to the draft, punishment of crimes of racism, xenophobia and denial of
genocide will not be immediately binding for the member EU countries,
but they will eventually have to transpose their national legislation
accordingly. Ankara argues that if the draft is adopted, any decision
by a national court or a national parliament of an EU member country
that would make it a crime to deny that Armenians were victims of
"genocide" at the hands of the Ottoman Empire would open the way for
imprisonment for dismissing the genocide charges in other EU member
countries. Late on Monday, following a Cabinet meeting, Cicek for
the first time publicly complained of the draft, mentioning the draft
would be brought on agenda of the EU later this month.

"This is an extremely inappropriate draft," Cicek said, criticizing
those who say there is no freedom of expression in Turkey or freedom of
expression has been limited in Turkey for not showing the appropriate
reaction to the draft, which he described as "devastating for the
freedom of expression."

Certain circles in Ankara and Ýstanbul are saying that the EU forms
the basis of freedom of expression, Cicek said, suggesting that this
draft would block conducting research on historical facts. He added
that PM Recep Tayyip Erdoðan would bring up the issue during his
talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel as he travels to Germany
over the weekend to jointly open with her Hanover Messe 2007, the
world’s largest industry and technology fair.

As for the Germany’s position, when approached by Today’s Zaman
following Cicek’s statement, Klemens Semtner, counselor for political
and press affairs at the German Embassy in Ankara, said the primary
motive of the draft — which was originally drawn up in 2001 after a
decade of escalation in racist crimes and xenophobia in all Europe,
which also targeted people of Turkish descent — was not made with
the Armenian allegations in mind.

"In the context of freedom of speech, we’re talking about statements
that incite hatred and violence, and I believe that no country would
regard these kinds of statements within the framework of freedom of
expression," Semtner said. "The draft text doesn’t cover governmental
statements and scientific research," he added, referring to Cicek’s
argument suggesting that if adopted, the draft would also block
scientific studies.

"There is a broad consensus among EU member countries that such
statements aimed at inciting hatred are not covered by freedom of
expression," he emphasized.

Meanwhile, an EU diplomat, speaking with Today’s Zaman separately
under condition of anonymity, warned that the Turkish government
should not evaluate the draft decision and the infamous Article 301
of the Turkish Penal Code (TCK) — which makes it a criminal offense
to denigrate "Turkishness" and is widely considered as a barrier in
front of freedom of expression in Turkey — within the same context.

"I don’t remember that there was a call for inciting hatred in
any of cases opened under Article 301," the same diplomat said,
referring to the fact that under the Article 301 many intellectuals,
including slain journalist Hrant Dink and Nobel Laureate Orhan Pamuk,
were also charged. "These are not comparable," he concluded.

–Boundary_(ID_w9e+T/EPLxu24JVfe7Xf9w) —

USDA And Card Provide Computer Equipment To Armavir City Veterinary

USDA AND CARD PROVIDE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TO ARMAVIR CITY VETERINARY INSPECTION AND LABORATORY OFFICE

ARMENPRESS
April 12 2007

Today the U.S. Embassy’s Department of Agriculture (USDA), in
collaboration with NGO CARD, held a demonstration of a new computer,
printer, and ‘AUGIUS’ software package with internet connection in
Armavir Marz, Armavir City Veterinary Inspection and Laboratory Office.

The computer packages are part of USDA’s long term National Animal
Health Project (NAHP) in close collaboration with the Armenian Ministry
of Agriculture. Each of the ten Marz veterinary offices will receive
a computer/software package with internet. Two computers have already
been placed in the Central Veterinary Laboratory in Yerevan.

U.S. Charge d’Affaires Anthony F. Godfrey, Deputy Minister of
Agriculture Levon Rukhkyan and Chief Veterinary Officer and Food
Safety Head Grisha Baghyan attended the demonstration.

During the event, Charge d’Affaires Affairs Anthony F. Godfrey noted
that these computers will improve the collection of animal disease
data and the transfer of this data to the central veterinary lab via
the internet. He said that the collection and distribution of this
vital information is an important step in the containment of endemic
animal diseases in Armenia.

ANKARA: Turkey’s ‘Local’ Foreigners Could Fill City Of Artvin

TURKEY’S ‘LOCAL’ FOREIGNERS COULD FILL CITY OF ARTVIN

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
April 11 2007

The number of foreigners living in Turkey is 176,717, a number very
close to the population of the northwestern town of Artvin.

The biggest group among those residing in Turkey without Turkish
citizenship is Bulgarian Turks with 53,698, though they are known
to have been suffering in the face of a great deal of bureaucracy in
their quest to obtain Turkish citizenship.

Following Bulgarians, the second biggest group is Azeri citizens with
10,477 people.

The number of German citizens in Turkey is 8,425 while there are
6,444 Russians and Britons, 6,133 Iraqis, 6,119 Americans and 6,014
Iranians living in Turkey.

Greek citizens living in Turkey total 5,902, while the number of
Chinese citizens registered in Turkey is 2,143.

Turkey’s Armenians population appears to be 350, although the
actual number is far higher but most of them are holders of Turkish
citizenship.

2,661 stateless

Among the foreigners living in Turkey, there are also two North
Koreans, 52 Yemenis, 72 Slovakians and 95 Malaysians. There are also
2,661 stateless people living in Turkey.

There are also citizens from Bosnia, India, Afghanistan, Australia,
Brazil, Japan and Canada.

The total number of 176,717 accounts for those who have been granted
a residence permit, there are also many thought to be residing in
Turkey without any sort of permit.

Commission Fines Poultry Farms For Abuse Of Dominating Positions

COMMISSION FINES POULTRY FARMS FOR ABUSE OF DOMINATING POSITIONS

ARMENPRESS
Apr 12 2007

YEREVAN, APRIL 12, ARMENPRESS: Armenian state commission for protection
of economic competition ruled yesterday to penalize three major poultry
farms in Lusakert, Arzni and Yerevan for abuse of their dominating
position in the local market.

The amount of the fine is 1 percent of their last year turnover.

The commission ruling was based on findings of a monitoring of eggs
and chicken meat sales from April to late December last year, which
revealed that the cost of their products rose 65 percent while the
cost of fodder they used remained unchanged.

The Commission also found that these three farms produced more eggs
and meat within that period than they sold. It said they could keep
prices low by throwing more products to the market.

It also said all three companies sold their products at the same
price, an implication that they could have struck a shadow agreement
to raise prices simultaneously.

Armenians To Vote In 1,923 Polling Stations

ARMENIANS TO VOTE IN 1,923 POLLING STATIONS

ARMENPRESS
Apr 12 2007

YEREVAN, APRIL 12, ARMENPRESS: Some 1,923 polling stations will open
in 41 constituencies in Armenia on May 12 for eligible Armenian voters
to elect their next parliament. Polling stations will open also in
seven correctional facilities for defendants pending their verdicts.

Suzan Simonian, a spokeswoman for Armenian justice ministry, said the
number of people pending court verdict is not specified yet. She said
the movement of defendants will be halted on May 9 and their exact
number will be specified.

Army soldiers will vote in polling stations located close to their
units.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress