Analysis: Nuclear power gaining popularity

United Press International
Aug 25 2004

Analysis: Nuclear power gaining popularity

Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:41:22 AM EST By ANDREA R.
MIHAILESCU, UPI Correspondent

WASHINGTON, Aug. 25 (UPI) — Nuclear power has become increasingly
popular worldwide, particularly in the developing world, as a source
of energy consumption, yet accidents involving radiation leaks
continue in some of the world’s safest nuclear plants. Amid rising
oil prices, developing countries have little alternative but to
depend on nuclear power.

Developing countries are increasing their nuclear power usage.
Armenia has one working reactor; Bulgaria has two; Ukraine three, and
Romania one. One nuclear power plant is under construction in Iran
and three more are planned. A total of 27 nuclear power plants are
under construction in developing countries.

Within the next several decades, energy consumption will at least
double or triple in developing countries with growing populations and
economies, according to Turkey’s Hurriyet.

Building nuclear power plants is expensive, but their operational
costs are relatively low. It is not difficult to obtain nuclear fuels
such as uranium or thorium. Nuclear power plants also produce
virtually no carbon emissions.

These power plants currently generate 16 percent of the electricity
the world consumes, and currently account for 78 percent of
electricity generation in France, about half of Belgium and Sweden’s
electricity, 28 percent of Germany’s electricity, 20 percent in the
United States, and 17 percent in Russia.

But even as nuclear power becomes increasingly popular worldwide,
some developed countries are considering shutting down their plants
amid plant malfunctions. Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and
Sweden have decided to gradually phase out their nuclear power
plants.

The oldest operating powerplant in Spain, the Jose Cabrera power
station in Almonacid de Zorita, will be shut down on April 30, 2006.
In 1994, more than 170 cracks were detected in the cover of the
reactor vessel; the cracks were only repaired in 1997. Dismantling
the station is expected to start in 2008 and completed in 2014 at a
projected cost of $165 million, according to Spain’s National
Radioactive Waste Company.

Sweden’s Nuclear Power Inspectorate intends to impose stricter safety
measures on the country’s nuclear power plants, which generate about
half of the country’s electricity, to bring the country into line
with IAEA and UN standards, according to the Svenska Dagbladet.
Renovation work will total $809 million. Citizens voted in 1980 to
phase out nuclear power by 2010, but the deadline was scrapped in
1997 because the country had not worked out how to replace lost
generating capacity.

Nuclear power plants have seen massive leaks throughout the decades
in some of the world’s safest plants as well as the world’s worst,
and increased safety measures by the IAEA and the UN nuclear watch
dog have not helped prevent such leaks. The third-safest power plant
in Russia, the Volgodonsk facility in the Rostov region, had to be
stopped twice within the past nine months due to emergencies in
November 2003 and January 2004.

Even Japan’s Mihama plutonium-thermal plant, considered the world’s
safest power plant, saw four workers killed when steam leaked from a
turbine reactor on August 9.

Japan’s Asahi Shimbun reported the accident as the worst ever in
Japan’s nuclear powerplants: “Trust was lost and the accident will
have a great impact on future nuclear power development.” And as
nuclear powerplants get older and older, problems like pipe corrosion
and equipment malfunction may increase.

Following the Mihama accident, Greenpeace Russia has expressed
concerns over conditions at Russian nuclear plants. “Japan’s nuclear
power plants are among the best in the world,” Greenpeace said in a
press release on Aug. 10. But in 2003, Japan failed to disclose the
critical state of several of its reactors, which led to an immediate
halt in operations at several nuclear plants.

Greenpeace reported that major disasters in Russia’s nuclear plants
were similar to the accident in Japan. “There will be accidents as
long as the nuclear power industry exists, and there could be a new
Chernobyl at any moment,” Russian Greenpeace head Ivan Blokov told
Interfax on Aug. 8.

Russia has a history of accidents. Three people were killed in an
accident at the Leningrad nuclear powerplant on February 6, 1974. The
facility was the venue for another disaster in autumn 1975, which
involved a radiation leak that continued for more than a month.
Fourteen people were killed in an accident at the Balakovo nuclear
plant on June 27, 1985.

A radiation leak also happened on U.S. soil when the 1979 Three Mile
Island reactor leaked radioactive material.

Despite such malfunctions, developing countries continue to construct
nuclear plants. A newly-built reactor in Ukraine, launched at the
Khmelnytskyy nuclear power plant, went offline due to massive
overheating on August 13. Ukraine has had several radiation leaks
throughout the decade, according to Washington-based Nuclear Threat
Initiative reports.

Equipment problems have also developed in two China-based power
plants which Russia helped China build. Russian Federal Atomic Energy
Agency Head Alexander Rumyantsev said that glitches arose in one
reactor’s equipment but hopes to eliminate those glitches within the
next two months. Regarding another reactor close to Beijing,
Rumyantsev told Interfax on Aug. 12, “Some parts of the equipment,
however, have started to malfunction, but we know how to fix them.”

Slovenia’s only nuclear power plant shut down automatically on August
10 as a safety precaution after a mistake occurred in the system that
regulates the amount of nuclear reaction taking place in the reactor.
According to a statement from the Nuclear Power Plant Krsko, the
control rods that regulate the amount of fission lost power after
their power source broke down on the evening of Aug. 9.

Another issue to consider is that nuclear technology can be used to
make weapons as well as electricity. China and Pakistan signed a
contract to supply a reactor pressure vessel for the second phase of
the Chashma Nuclear Power Station in Pakistan. China Nuclear Energy
Industry Corporation Deputy General Manager Huang Guojun said
Pakistan had pledged that technology would be used solely for
peaceful purposes with no transferal to a third parties. It is
difficult to ignore the fact that nuclear technology has benefits in
addition to its primary function of electricity generation.

With no oil or gas of its own, Turkey has been debating the issue of
construction of nuclear power plants in the country. But even if
Turkey decides not to construct nuclear plants of its own, the
country will be affected by any accidents that may occur in nearby
countries — just as in the case of the 1986 Chernobyl accident.

Earthquake-prone countries such as Armenia may see disastrous
radiation leaks to one of its units if an earthquake occurs. One of
Armenia’s power plant units has been shut down for repairs and
nuclear fuel loading in late July, according to plant General
Director Garik Markosian.

Proper disposal of nuclear waste, meanwhile, is a growing problem in
developing and developed countries. In short, nuclear power plants
may be environmentally friendly and cheaper to operate generating a
cheaper source of energy consumption — but with the risks the plants
pose, no one wants to live near one.

“Until about 2 billion years ago, it was impossible to have any life
on Earth. That is, there was so much radiation on Earth you couldn’t
have any life — fish or anything. Gradually, about 2 billion years
ago, the amount of radiation on this planet reduced and made it
possible for some form of life to begin. It started in the seas, I
understand from what I’ve read. And that amount of radiation has been
gradually decreasing because all radiation has a half-life, which
means ultimately there will be no radiation. Now, when we go back to
using nuclear power, we are creating something that nature tried to
destroy to make life possible,” said Admiral Hyman Rickover, known as
the father of the U.S. nuclear navy.