Employment reaches record high in Armenia

 13:11,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 25, ARMENPRESS. A ‘historic record’ number of jobs was recorded in Armenia in December 2023, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said at the Cabinet meeting on January 25.

“In December 2023, the number of jobs was 741,726, which is more by 193,737 compared to May of 2018, which means that 193,737 jobs were opened in Armenia since May of 2018,” Pashinyan said.

The December 2023 indicator is 5,3% more compared to December 2022.

Cadastre committee chief highlights ‘legal assessment’ in border delimitation process

 13:13,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 25, ARMENPRESS. The “legal assessment” is the most important part in the delimitation and demarcation process between Armenia and Azerbaijan, according to Cadastre Committee chief Suren Tovmasyan.

“It is only based on the legal assessment that we can say which maps can serve as the basis for carrying out this process,” Tovmasyan told reporters when asked whether or not authorities have updates on which maps will be used in the process. “These works are underway, the Deputy Prime Minister of Armenia is chairing a task force, which includes my deputies, daily work is done,” he said.

Asked to comment on PM Pashinyan’s earlier statement that ‘Armenia never had a [land] cadastre certificate,’ Tovmasyan said that the premier was referring to the fact that the country’s borders are not delimitated or demarcated. “When Armenia’s borders will be demarcated and delimitated, it would mean that Armenia’s borders are documented,” Tovmasyan said.

The Arbitration and Mediation Center of Armenia is forming a new arbitration culture in the country. Tatevik Matinyan

 14:24,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 25, ARMENPRESS. Among the alternative mechanisms of dispute resolution, arbitration is accepted all over the world and is very popular. In May 2023, the Arbitration and Mediation Center of Armenia was opened in Armenia, which is the first and only arbitration center in Armenia having a Board of Trustees and an Arbitration Council, comprised of internationally renowned specialists. We talked with the director of the Center, Tatevik Matinyan, about founding an arbitration center, its goals, the need to spread the arbitration culture, and other topics.

Ms. Matinya, let's talk a little about your professional path, how long have you been in the legal field?

I started working in the legal field in the early 2000s, in parallel with my studies. I mainly worked in human rights NGOs, but one of the best schools for me in terms of gaining experience and improving my skills was the Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly Vanadzor Office, where I was the coordinator of legal programs. There was a team of 18 people under my direct supervision and 3 branches. For me, working in the Assembly was particularly important, because management in the legal field has many nuances.

Of course, I also continued my legal practice during the mentioned period. After receiving the advocate license, I worked for more than 13 years both on domestic and international courts, as a result of which, I also won cases at the European Court of Human Rights, one of which was against Azerbaijan.

In 2022, I went to the University of Stanford to improve my knowledge. Sharing experience at the international level and constantly learning is of great importance in my professional development. I was also the president of the Institute of Liberal Politics, where the nature of my work was again a mix of legal and administrative responsibilities.

In May 2023, when the Arbitration and Mediation Center of Armenia was established, I was appointed the director of this foundation. The existence of such Center is a very important achievement for the legal system of Armenia and for me personally.

Let’s talk about establishing the Arbitration and Mediation Center of Armenia, AMCA.

The establishment of the Arbitration Center in Armenia was planned by the 2019-2023 strategy of judicial reforms in Armenia. In 2021, the Advisory Committee was established, in which local and international renowned and outstanding experts were involved to ensure the comprehensive application of professional approaches during the establishment of the Center. In May 2023, the first decision on the creation of the “Arbitration and Mediation Center of Armenia” foundation was signed by the founders of the Center: The Center for Legislation Development Foundation, the Armenian General Benevolent Union, and the Armenian Bar Association. The EU budget support program has made a significant contribution into the formation of the Center.

The arbitration rules of the Center are based on the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules.

Ms. Matinyan, arbitration and mediation are new concepts for our society. Could you please explain in more detail what arbitration and mediation are?

If we describe it simply and briefly, they are alternative methods of dispute resolution. Arbitration is an effective tool used by individuals and organizations to resolve legal disputes outside of the traditional judicial system. Arbitration offers a faster and more flexible approach where decisions are made by impartial and specialized arbitrators. Mediation is a modern dispute resolution process where a neutral third party, the mediator, helps the parties reach a mutually acceptable agreement through discussion and negotiation. It is widely used in the settlement of family, labor and civil disputes.

The purpose of the Arbitration and Mediation Center of Armenia is to develop the culture of alternative dispute resolution in Armenia, increase the reputation of Armenia as a leading platform for alternative dispute resolution, contribute to reducing the burden on the judicial system, and also provide a more favorable investment environment. The latter is very important, so I will specifically address it. When an individual or an organization from abroad wants to understand how favorable an environment in Armenia is for investments, one of the first things they pay attention to is the existence of an alternative dispute resolution institution. Due to this, the investment rating of the country, so to speak, increases.  

We have international arbitrators by country, by language, by specialization. For example, people living in France or Italy who have a dispute can apply to AMCA, even without being physically present, choose an arbitrator, the law applicable to their dispute, and resolve the dispute. The solution for applying for remote arbitration is quite popular in other countries, and we have already taken the first steps, we are going to implement appropriate technological solutions to create the platform and organize this process effectively.

Why should other countries turn to Armenian arbitration, to AMCA, to resolve their dispute?

We have industry-specialized arbitrators who, being knowledgeable and deeply informed about the client’s industry, conduct arbitration and mediation in a professional and efficient manner. For example, arbitration may be conducted in commercial, construction, mining, energy, telecommunications, investment, information technology, intellectual property, financial banking, corporate, sports, labor and other disputes. The pricing policy is also essential, taking into account the presence of our highly specialized arbitrators and the costs of services, compared to other countries, are more affordable. We are flexible and can also apply the principles of remote arbitration, the parties will not be obliged to be physically present.

Arbitration is completely confidential, but must be visible and transparent in its processes. Our arbitrators are chosen based on their absolute professional and competent principles. Being trustworthy, fast, reliable and professional are the key criteria of our activity. Our goal is to make sure that even the losing party leaves the arbitration satisfied and confident that the whole process was fair.

Mediation is slightly different in nature and both parties should come out with a win-win status. Mediation is also the stage of dispute prevention. It often happens that during the arbitration, the parties understand that they want to settle. Our dispute resolution experience shows that disputes sometimes arise because the parties simply do not talk to each other about their problem.

Can you please describe the sequence of actions involved in arbitration?

In order for the parties to be able to apply for arbitration, an arbitration agreement must be concluded between them, which can be included in the contract itself or by drawing up a separate document in writing.

After submitting the case to us, the applicant must submit a request for arbitration to resolve the dispute at the Center. The arbitration proceedings are considered to have started from the moment that document is received by the Center.

The request for arbitration must include data of the parties to the dispute, present the nature and facts of the dispute, the claim, as well as other information provided by the arbitration rules of the Center. The Center sends the request for arbitration to the respondent, giving up to 30 days to submit a response.

The parties entrusting the handling of the arbitration case to the Center can choose the procedure of examining the case, either through general or expedited procedures. The cases in which the claim exceeds AMD 10 million, or the dispute is of an international nature, are examined in general procedure. Those local cases where the claim does not exceed AMD 10 million are examined through expedited procedure.

The party may submit a petition to the Center to apply an emergency measure, if due to urgent circumstances, before the formation of the Arbitration Tribunal, there is a need to apply a means of securing a claim or securing evidence. When applying to the Center, the parties can choose how many arbitrators will hear the case, giving preference to one or, for example, a three-member arbitration tribunal. In the case of a three-member Arbitration Tribunal, each party chooses one arbitrator, and the latter appoint the presiding arbitrator.

The parties may, in their discretion, agree on the venue of the arbitration and the language to be used in the arbitration. This is followed by the formation stage of the Arbitral Tribunal, when the Arbitration Council of the Center approves the arbitrators nominated by the parties or appoints them if they are not nominated.

Immediately after the formation of the Arbitration Tribunal, the Center delivers the case materials to them and ensures efficient and speedy communication between the Tribunal and the parties.

The Tribunal establishes and approves the protocol of the case investigation with the parties, as well as discusses with them the order of conducting the case by approving a procedural schedule. The Tribunal may conduct hearings, engage experts, question witnesses and perform other necessary actions to establish facts and examine evidence essential to the investigation of the case.

After the described actions have been taken, the Tribunal shall conclude the arbitration proceedings and make an award.

What is the significance of the foundation of AMCA for Armenia?

One of our goals is to contribute to the change of the legal culture and to build trust among the society so that Armenian businessmen make arbitration and mediation an integral part of their activities. On the other hand, we should contribute to increasing the level of trust and awareness towards arbitration centers. Surely, Armenia can be competitive alongside other leading countries as a country that implements independent, impartial and fair arbitration. To make Armenia a desirable platform for arbitration, we have all the prerequisites: high-quality and professional specialists and accessibility in all senses.

ANN/Armenian News – Calendar of Events – 01/25/2024

Open Letter to Ben Savage: Stop Demeaning Armenian Genocide Victims & Survivors

THE BLUNT POST
Jan 24 2024

By Vic Gerami

Hey, Ben Savage,

I was flattered to learn yesterday that you or your team blocked me on X (Twitter). I imagine it’s because I called you out on your hollow and offensive political posturing posts devoid of empathy, education, or solution.

You, me, and your ‘team’ know that you will not get elected to Congress to replace Congressman Schiff. Similarly, I knew you didn’t have a chance to become a Councilmember when you ran for West Hollywood City Council a year ago.

What I do know is that unlike your disingenuous posts about the West Hollywood ‘community,’ your hollow posts about Artsakh and Armenians are deeply offensive. As a gay man and having grown up in LA, I’ve been an integral part of West Hollywood since I came out of the closet in 2001. In all these years, I’ve never seen you in WeHo, ONCE. I’ve never witnessed you make any effort to be a part of the ‘West Hollywood community,’ NOT queer WeHo or anything else. But while campaigning, you suddenly talked like you were Elton John. That’s fake, disrespectful, and BS.

But now, you and your ‘team’ keep posting half-hazard copy/photos on your social media handles to win over the Armenian vote, without which not you or any other candidate can become a Congressperson from District 30. You have made no effort to get to know Armenian-Americans, learn about our struggle, the second Armenian Genocide (Artsakh Genocide), how we’ve been going through the worst tragedy and struggles since WWI, how we are under attack by anti-Armenian/Armenophobic flyers and hate speech all over LA and Beverly Hills. No, you have not. You simply have a strategist and a campaign manager who tell you what to say to get the vote.

In the latter case of the two runs for office, you’ve gone too far. Azerbaijan, with help from Turkiye, Russia, and Israel, massacred 10,000+ Armenians from 2020 to 2023, dozens of Armenians are currently held hostage by Aliyev’s brutal regime, Azerbaijan has escalated the cultural genocide of Armenian churches, monasteries, cemeteries, and monuments. ARMENIANS’ WOUNDS ARE TOO FRESH FOR YOU TO PLAY POLITICS.

We get you are trying to drum-p publicity for your dormant acting career, but NOT at our expense. I’ve offered you myself as a journalist, a scholar, and an expert about the matter if you truly wanted to learn. But you’ve not taken up my offer. Nor do I see your rhetoric changing to think that you are getting your facts from someone educated.

I’ll leave you with three quotes from Thomas Sowell

‘One of the painfully sobering realizations that some from reding history is the utter incompetence that is possible among leaders of whole nations and empires – and the blind faith that such leaders can nevertheless inspire among the people whore enthralled by their words or their posturing’

‘When you want to help people, you tell them the truth.
When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear’

‘It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance’


https://thebluntpost.com/open-letter-to-ben-savage-stop-demeaning-armenian-genocide-victims-survivors/?fbclid=IwAR0Gw04y0UI7amUGBN8ttcFf_eABkolnqoT3TY0TYmC5t0CQqbk349PtXTc

Religious directorate says Armenian writer should be prosecuted for remarks on Islamic call to prayer


Jan 25 2024

The Turkish Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) has filed a criminal complaint against Armenian writer and linguist Sevan Nişanyan for his remarks about the Islamic call to prayer (adhan), Turkish Minute reported, citing the Gazete Duvar news website.

“I know of no other attack as disgusting as the adhan over loudspeakers. [It is] rape, harassment at the level of grabbing people’s private parts. This is one of the most horrible aspects of life in Turkey,” Nişanyan said on Sunday in his weekly livestream on YouTube where he answers questions from his fanbase.

The complaint, filed with the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, alleges that Nişanyan’s remarks on Sunday constitute an insult to Islamic religious values and symbols as well as a provocation of public division and tension.

According to the state-run Anadolu news agency, the complaint filed by the Diyanet claims that Nişanyan’s comments “crossed the boundaries of respect” and incited “hatred” with a “hostile attitude” towards the Islamic faith and values.

The complaint calls for Nişanyan to be prosecuted for “insulting public officials in the performance of their duties” and “inciting the public to hatred and hostility.”

Nişanyan, a 66-year-old writer, is known in Turkey for his controversial views. In 2014 he was imprisoned in Turkey on charges of illegal construction. He claims this was in response to his criticism of restrictions on freedom of _expression_ in the country. After escaping from a low security prison in 2017, Nişanyan applied for asylum in Greece but was deported in January 2022 due to what Athens said were problems with his residence permit. After a short stay in Armenia, he now lives in Montenegro.

Nişanyan’s previous conviction in Turkey for blasphemy in connection with a 2012 blog post defending an Islamophobic film has added to his controversial status.

https://stockholmcf.org/religious-directorate-says-armenian-writer-should-be-prosecuted-for-remarks-on-islamic-call-to-prayer/

Turkey’s Religious Affairs Directorate files criminal complaint against Armenian author Nişanyan over remark on adhan

 duvaR.english 
Turkey, Jan 25 2024

Duvar English

Turkey’s Religious Affairs Directorate (Diyanet) has filed a criminal complaint against Armenian author and linguist Sevan Nişanyan for his statements criticizing the loudness of the adhan (the Islamic calls to prayer that occur five times each day) in a YouTube livestream. 

The complaint suggested Nişanyan’s words “insulted the adhan, attacked and debased the religious values of all Muslims, and offended the Directorate as well as its public officials,” state-run Anadolu Agency reported on Jan. 24. 

According to the Directorate, Nişanyan crossed the lines of respect and “spewed hatred to the Turkish public’s beliefs and spiritual values in a hostile manner.” The complaint requested a public prosecution for the author for the crimes of “insulting public officers about their duty,” and “provoking and insulting the public to enmity.”

The statement is from a 2021 livestream on Nişanyan’s YouTube channel. He said, “I don’t know any attack as vile and intrusive as blasting the adhan through speakers. It is one of the most despicable aspects of life in Turkey, the adhan bellowing like animals.” 

In 2013, the self-proclaimed “honest atheist” and controversial figure was sentenced to a year in prison for insulting Prophet Muhammed of Islam. He has been living abroad since 2017 after fleeing prison where he was staying on charges related to illegal development on an archeological site.  

Azerbaijan Accuses PACE Of Bias, Suspends Cooperation With Council Of Europe’s Legislative Body.

uazmi.com
Jan 25 2024

Azerbaijani troops march during a military parade in Khankendi, known by Armenians as Stepanakert, in Nagorno-Karabakh, on November 8.

Azerbaijan on January 24 said it was suspending its cooperation with the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) amid deteriorating relations with Brussels.

In a statement , the Azerbaijani delegation to the PACE said the Strasbourg-based legislative body was “being used as a platform to target some member states.”

The decision came two days after Germany’s Frank Schwabe challenged the credentials of the Azerbaijani delegation on the opening day of PACE’s 2024 winter session.

Schwabe specifically raised concerns about the status of political prisoners in Azerbaijan and cited the “violent displacement of people” from Nagorno-Karabakh following Azerbaijan’s recapture of the ethnic Armenian-dominated region. More than 100,000 ethnic Armenians fled Nagorno-Karabakh after Azerbaijan recaptured the territory in September 2023.

The German representative also pointed out that PACE rapporteurs had been unable to visit Azerbaijan on at least three occasions in 2023.

The Azerbaijani delegation complained in its statement that “core principles of the PACE are exploited by certain biased groups to advance their narrow interests.” It further charged that "political corruption, discrimination, ethnic and religious hatred, double standards, arrogance, chauvinism have become prevailing practice in the PACE.”

The delegation accused the PACE of exhibiting “Azerbaijanophobia and Islamophobia,” creating what it described as an “unbearable atmosphere” that it said contributed to Baku’s decision to “cease its engagement with and presence at the PACE until further notice.”

Azerbaijan’s decision to leave the PACE comes amid growing tensions with the European Union as Baku accuses Brussels of “bias” toward Yerevan as Armenia and Azerbaijan try to normalize relations.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on January 10 rejected a proposal by Armenia to use Soviet-era maps drawn in the 1970s to delineate borders, claiming that Azerbaijani territories had been handed to Armenia by the Soviet authorities.

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell on January 22 criticized Aliyev’s “territorial claims” and warned that there would be “severe consequences” if Armenia’s territorial integrity was violated.

The following day, Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry said Borrell’s comments amounted to a “blatant misinterpretation of facts” and accused the chief EU diplomat of engaging in “threatening rhetoric.”

Armenia and Azerbaijan Address Concerns Over Territorial Integrity

Jamestown Foundation
Jan 24 2024

Executive Summary:

  • Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has proposed a new constitution to address matters of external security and territorial integrity, which continue to hold up peace negotiations between Baku and Yerevan.
  • Azerbaijan and Armenia have expressed the necessity of unambiguously recognizing one another’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in establishing a lasting peace in the South Caucasus.
  • Differences in how Baku and Yerevan see the security and administration of the Zangezur Corridor could derail the peace process.

On January 19, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called for a new constitution in a meeting with senior officials from the Armenian Ministry of Justice. Pashinyan asserted that Armenia needs “a new constitution, not constitutional changes,” adding that the new foundational document would make the country “more competitive and viable in the new geopolitical and regional environment” (Azatutyun.am, January 19). He highlighted that the new constitution would maintain the present parliamentary system and underscored “external security” and “internationally recognized sovereign territory” as the main issues to be addressed. Mutual respect for one another’s territorial integrity remains a sticking point in peace negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan. If Yerevan proceeds with Pashinyan’s proposal, the new constitution would eliminate certain hurdles to signing a peace treaty with Baku.

Pashinyan’s plan is widely believed to be related to the normalization of Armenian relations with Azerbaijan and Türkiye. Azerbaijani officials and experts often argue that the current Armenian constitution contains territorial claims against Baku and Ankara. In 2021, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev referred to this as one of the main challenges to peace efforts in the South Caucasus. In an interview with a Turkish media channel, Aliyev declared, “There is a territorial claim against Türkiye in the Constitution of Armenia. They should abandon that. They need to revise and re-adopt their constitution. … They must give up their claims against Türkiye and Azerbaijan” (President.az, September 28, 2021).

Yerevan also has concerns about Azerbaijan respecting Armenia’s territorial integrity. On October 17, 2023, during a session of the European Parliament, Pashinyan stated, “Armenia recognizes Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity within [a land area of] 86,600 square kilometers. But the president of Azerbaijan has not responded in kind. … This has raised concerns among some analysts that he is deliberately maintaining some ambiguity in order to make territorial claims against Armenia” (TASS, October 17, 2023). Baku has tried to alleviate those concerns and, in December, signed a joint statement “reconfirming the intention to normalize relations and reach a peace treaty on the basis of respect for the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity” (Euronews, December 7, 2023).

Pashinyan’s government seems to have accepted Baku’s worries and agrees with the necessity of unambiguously recognizing both countries’ territorial integrity. On January 20, during a meeting with members of his political party, Pashinyan stated that Armenia and Azerbaijan need to ensure that there will be no basis for the resurgence of territorial claims in the future. He declared, “Diplomatic texts always have different twists, subtexts, and footnotes. The footnotes of Azerbaijan’s proposals, and perhaps Azerbaijan in ours, observe the dangers of territorial claims, if not today, then in the future” (Armenpress.com, January 20).

The opening of the Zangezur Corridor has become a more contentious issue in this regard and threatens to derail the peace process. In an interview with local television channels on January 10, Aliyev stated that, if this corridor remains closed, Azerbaijan refuses to open its border with Armenia anywhere else (President.az, January 10). The Azerbaijani government expects Yerevan to provide “unimpeded” land passage between the western part of mainland Azerbaijan and the Nakhchivan exclave as envisioned under the November 2020 trilateral statement ending the Second Karabakh War. Baku insists that cargo, passengers, and vehicles should be subject to inspection and customs clearance only when they travel internationally, not between mainland Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan. Azerbaijan also expects Armenia to agree with the deployment of Russian border guards along the corridor.

Armenia has not agreed to these terms, while Russia agrees with only the second condition. Yerevan has proposed providing the Zangezur Corridor with the same regulations that would be applied to the trans-Iranian Aras Corridor (Armenpress.am, January 17). This is unacceptable to the Russian side, as Moscow wants Armenia to abide by the November 2020 trilateral statement. The Kremlin, however, rejects the Azerbaijani proposal for unchecked and customs-free passage along the Zangezur Corridor. According to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, such an arrangement had never been discussed in the earlier trilateral meetings of Armenian, Azerbaijani, and Russian leaders (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MID), January 18).

Lavrov also argues that Russian border guards should regulate transit along this land route, including customs and security checks. In a briefing on January 18, Lavrov said, “Armenia is having difficulty opening the route as laid out in the trilateral statement. Yerevan is putting forward additional security requirements for the route. It does not want Russian border guards to be there, though this is written in the statement that bears Pashinyan’s signature. He does not want to see non-aligned customs and border control. He wants Armenia to run it, which contradicts the agreement” (MID, January 18). Additionally, Lavrov criticized Western interference for blocking the implementation of the agreements reached by the regional countries.

Armenia and Azerbaijan appear to agree on the necessity for unequivocal recognition of one another’s territorial integrity to facilitate lasting peace in the region. The disputes concerning the Zangezur Corridor, however, may delay their efforts to sign a peace agreement in the near future. Further complicating matters, the Zangezur issue has wider geopolitical implications, directly involving Russia and indirectly involving the West. Baku realizes the disadvantages of this situation and calls for bilateral talks with Yerevan on all remaining issues between the two states, promoting the “regional solutions to regional problems” approach (see EDM, October 25, November 1327, 2023). The two republics of the South Caucasus may be unable to reach a peace treaty if they fail to neutralize the self-serving intervention of third parties.

https://jamestown.org/program/armenia-and-azerbaijan-address-concerns-over-territorial-integrity/