ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
07/01/2004
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://
1. Talvitie Confirms Stepped-up European Involvement in Peace Process
2. Saddam Appears before Iraqi Tribunal
3. Increasing Investor Interest in Mountainous Karabagh
4. Armenian President Visits US Embassy
5. Much Awaited Navasartian Festivities Underway
1. Talvitie Confirms Stepped-up European Involvement in Peace Process
YEREVAN (Armenpress/RFE/RL)--Armenia's inclusion in the European Union (EU)
Wider Europe program, the country's relations with the EU and Turkey, as well
as the Karabagh conflict were among the topics discussed by Armenia's foreign
minister Vartan Oskanian and EU special representative for the South Caucasus
Heikki Talvitie who arrived in Yerevan after a two-day visit to Mountainous
Karabagh Republic.
During a joint news conference with Oskanian, Talvitie, who is on a regional
tour, reaffirmed the EU's intention to play a greater role in the
international
efforts to end the Karabagh conflict. He said he maintains regular contacts
with the Minsk Group co-chairs.
"I have the mandate to assist in this process," Talvitie said, adding that
the
EU is ready to support "confidence-building measures" between the parties.
Oskanian confirmed that a team of international mediators will visit Armenia,
Azerbaijan and MKR later this month, but will not submit a formal peace
proposal to the conflicting parties.
"Negotiations at the level of presidents and foreign ministers have not yet
reached a point where the co-chairs have enough material to put something on
paper," Oskanian said. "We are still not there and I don't expect that the
co-chairs will bring anything written during their visit."
On Tuesday, Talvitie paid his first-ever visit to Karabagh as the new
representative in the region. In Stepanakert, he discussed prospects for
conflict resolution with the MKR leadership.
His delegation also met with Armenian President Kocharian who conveyed the EU
representative's frequent visits to the region confirm the body's growing
interest in the South Caucasus, particularly Armenia. Armenia's relations with
the EU and Turkey, and the Karabagh conflict were discussed.
2. Saddam Appears before Iraqi Tribunal
BAGHDAD (Reuters)--Downcast but defiant, Iraq's former dictator Saddam Hussein
has appeared before an Iraqi judge, questioning his authority and saying the
"real criminal" was US President George W. Bush.
Hussein, led to the US-guarded courtroom in handcuffs and chains, was read
seven charges on Thursday that may lead to formal indictment for war crimes,
crimes against humanity and genocide.
"I am Saddam Hussein, president of Iraq," he repeated, before grilling the
unnamed young judge about his authority.
Video footage of the 67-year-old Hussein, his face worn and deeply lined with
heavy bags under the eyes, was broadcast around the world soon after his
30-minute court appearance.
He was wearing a dark grey pinstriped jacket and a white formal shirt, and
had
a trimmed, mostly grey beard. It was the first public view of Hussein since he
appeared wildly unkempt in photographs and videotape shot after his capture in
December.
Hussein refused to recognize that he was guilty of a crime in invading Kuwait
in 1990, jabbing his finger towards the judge and saying: "I'm surprised
you're
charging me with that as an Iraqi when everyone knows that Kuwait is part of
Iraq."
The judge told him these were legal procedures, but Saddam interrupted him:
"Law, what law?" he asked.
"You are putting Saddam on trial when the Kuwaitis said they could buy Iraqi
women for 10 dinars on the street. The Iraqi soldiers went to defend the honor
of Iraq, so what right do these dogs have?" he said, drawing a reprimand from
the judge.
"This is all a theater," Hussein said with a half-smile. "The real
criminal is
Bush."
The White House, said Hussein, would face the justice he denied his people
and
brushed aside his assertion about Bush.
Hussein arrived in a US helicopter at a military base and was then driven in
an armored bus to the makeshift courtroom in one of his former palaces near
Baghdad international airport.
The arraignment was the first step towards a trial which could help Iraq come
to terms with 35 years of Baath party brutality, though it may not start for
many months.
Apart from the 1990 invasion of Kuwait, the preliminary charges against
Hussein referred to the suppression of Kurdish and Shi'ite revolts after the
1991 Gulf War, poison gas attacks and other massacres of Kurds, the killing of
religious leaders in 1974 and the killing of political figures over three
decades.
Hearing the charge that he ordered the gassing of thousands of Kurds in an
attack at Halabja in 1988, Hussein shrugged it off, saying he had heard of the
incident through the media.
Without a lawyer to represent him, Hussein refused to sign a statement
acknowledging he had been charged and read his rights.
One foreign lawyer hired by his wife to represent him said the absence of a
defense attorney breached Hussein's rights.
3. Increasing Investor Interest in Mountainous Karabagh
STEPANAKERT (Armenpress)--The Prime Minister of Mountainous Karabagh Republic
Anushavan Danielian, told a European Union delegation that in spite of Azeri
aggression and the ensuing war that caused widespread damage, the
government of
MKR has taken steps to recover the economy.
He briefed the delegation, headed by EU special representative for the South
Caucasus Heikki Talvitie, about MKR's privatization process, as well as
implementation of economic reforms and investment projects. Speaking about
MKR,
he said that what used to be a "risky [investment] zone," now attracts an
increasing number of foreign investors who have become more secure.
They also discussed possible approaches to resolving the Karabagh conflict,
the current pace of talks, as well as the importance of MKR's participation in
negotiations.
4. Armenian President Visits US Embassy
YEREVAN (Armenpress)--On the occasion of the July 4 Independence Day Holiday,
Armenian President Robert Kocharian and First Lady Bella, visited the US
Embassy in Yerevan to congratulate embassy personnel. Kocharian told the staff
he is confident the two countries are on track in developing strong ties.
5. Much Awaited Navasartian Festivities Underway
VAN NUYSThe much anticipated closing weekend celebrations of the 29th
Homenetmen Navasartian Games began at Van Nuys Grant High School on Thursday,
July 1.
Musical guests Maxim Panosian, Arsham, Ara Shahbazian and Karnig Sarkisian
were on hand to mark the opening night of the ceremonies. In attendance were
Homenetmen chapter representatives from the Los Angeles, Colorado, Phoenix,
San
Francisco, Santa Clarita, Walnut Creek, Fresno and San Diego areas.
Throughout the weekend, the festival's grounds at Grant High School (13000
Oxnard St., Valley Glen, CA, 91401) will be filled with exciting attractions,
great food, arts and crafts--something for everyone--as well as booths from
various Homenetmen chapters and popular local vendors from the
Armenian-American community.
After the elimination rounds, all final games and meets will be held on
Sunday. The Navasartian games will conclude on Sunday.
The closing ceremonies and parade of athletes will take place on Sunday, July
4 at 6:00 PM.
For more information about the festivities, log on to
All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2004 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.
ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.
Monterey Design Systems Hires 50th Employee in Armenia; Company
Monterey Design Systems Hires 50th Employee in Armenia; Company
Recognized for Outstanding Contribution to Armenia’s High-tech
Industry
LOS ALTOS HILLS, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–07/01/2004–Monterey Design
Systems has just hired its 50th employee in Armenia, and for its
outstanding contribution to the growth of Armenia’s high-tech
industry, the company has received a special award from the Armenian
Chamber of Commerce. In a ceremony held yesterday in Silicon Valley,
Dr. Aram Vardanyan, chairman of the Armenian Chamber of Commerce,
presented the award to Dr. Jacques Benkoski, president and CEO of
Monterey.
“We are extremely pleased that Monterey Design Systems selected
Armenia for its R&D facility. We continue to be impressed by how fast
the company has grown their team over the last year,” said Aram
Vardanyan, who is also a member of the Armenia Academy of Science and
was the former General Director of the Semiconductors Plants in
Armenia.
Monterey has steadily increased its operation at its Arset R&D Center
in Yerevan, Armenia, recently passing the milestone of 50
employees. “Since Monterey began operations in Armenia, we’ve built an
excellent team based on very highly educated and qualified engineers
and with a close cooperation with Yerevan University,” said Hayk
Hovhannisyan, general manager of Monterey’s Arset operation. “We have
enjoyed tremendous success and growth, and it’s a pleasure to be
contributing to Monterey’s overall success in this way.”
Monterey’s Arset R&D facilities in Yerevan are based in the Viasphere
Technopark (), a well recognized commercial park,
housing over 300 professionals and several high technology companies
representing diverse disciplines including semiconductors,
semiconductor intellectual property, electronic design automation,
enterprise software, and network management.
About Monterey Design Systems
Based in Mountain View, Calif., and with offices in major electronics
markets worldwide, Monterey Design Systems Inc. provides software to
enable the design of today’s most complex systems on a chip
(SoCs). With Monterey’s physical design solutions, engineering teams
can improve the performance, shorten the time to market, and reduce
the cost of the products they design. Global electronics giants such
as ST Microelectronics, Toshiba, NEC, and Zoran have been taping out
chips using Monterey tools for more than four years. Monterey partners
with other leading EDA companies, such as Cadence (NYSE:_CDN_
(aol://4785:CDN/) ) and Synopsys (Nasdaq:_SNPS_ (aol://4785:SNPS/) ),
to ensure interoperability in all major design flows. To learn more,
visit
Monterey and Monterey Design Systems are registered trademarks or
trademarks of Monterey Design Systems. Viasphere and Viasphere
Technopark are registered trademarks or trademarks of Viasphere. All
other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
CONTACT:Monterey Design Systems Juli Rombuck, 650-237-2022
[email protected] or Cayenne Communication Michelle Clancy,
252-940-0981 [email protected]
SOURCE: Monterey Design Systems
07/01/2004 18:02 EASTERN
Reports: Time Warner Enters MGM Bidding
Associated Press
July 1 2004
Reports: Time Warner Enters MGM Bidding
Bidding War Said to Break Out for MGM, With Time Warner Offering $3B
in Cash, Stock for Studio
LOS ANGELES July 1, 2004 – A bidding war has broken out for
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., with Time Warner Inc. offering about $3
billion in cash and stock for the venerable Hollywood studio plus the
assumption of $2 billion in debt, according to newspaper reports.
The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal reported in Thursday
editions that Time Warner has made a preliminary offer for MGM that
rivals overtures from Sony Corp. The reports valued the deal at $13
cash per share for public shareholders, plus the assumption of nearly
$2 billion in MGM debt. Majority shareholder Kirk Kerkorian would get
$11.50 a share in Time Warner stock under the deal, The Times said.
A spokeswoman for MGM and a spokesman for Time Warner both declined
to comment.
The reports of the rival bid for MGM sent the company’s shares up 56
cents, or more than 4.6 percent, to close at $12.66 in heavy trading
Thursday on the New York Stock Exchange. Time Warner’s shares fell 17
cents to close at $17.41.
MGM chairman and chief executive Alex Yemenidjian alluded to a
bidding war during a presentation Tuesday to shareholders at the
Beverly Hills Hotel. “We have more strategic alternatives available
to us than we realized,” he told about 100 shareholders.
MGM, famous for “The Wizard of Oz” and the James Bond and the Pink
Panther series, has been in talks with Sony for months over a sale
for roughly the same price. MGM continued talks with Sony even after
a 15-day exclusive negotiation period expired in late May.
Under that proposed deal, Sony would contribute about $1.5 billion of
the $3 billion in cash needed to close the deal. The rest would come
from Sony’s financial partners, which include Texas Pacific Group and
Providence Equity Partners.
Sony has not been able to close the deal due to a snag with its
partners on financing terms. At issue is how soon the partners would
be bought out of their investment by Sony, sources familiar with the
talks have said.
Billionaire Kirk Kerkorian owns 74 percent of MGM, which is being
courted primarily because of its vast film library of more than 4,000
titles.
A bid from Time Warner could raise warnings flags with antitrust
regulators since the giant media company already owns Hollywood
powerhouse studio Warner Bros.
A strong bid from Time Warner would also mark a return to the
deal-making table for the media giant after several years’ absence.
Time Warner has spent the last few years repairing its balance sheet
and reorganizing its management and corporate structure following the
disastrous merger with America Online in 2001.
In recent months, the company has been carefully considering new
deals, including a possible offer for cable systems owned by
now-bankrupt Adelphia Communications Corp.
Time Warner remains hampered in its deal-making by a continuing
investigation into its accounting practices by the Securities and
Exchange Commission, placing limits on its ability to issue new
securities.
Fresno: Library acquires Saroyan items
Library acquires Saroyan items
The Fresno Bee
(Updated Thursday, July 1, 2004, 9:16 AM)
The Fresno County Library has acquired a variety of William Saroyan items,
notably unpublished manuscripts and a collection of more than 300 letters,
cards and postcards sent from Saroyan to his daughter Lucy from 1953-72.
The library plans to show the collection at a press conference this morning.
Genealogy Room Librarian William Secrest Jr. says the addition gives the
Fresno library one of the pre-eminent research collections devoted to the
life and works of Saroyan, the internationally acclaimed author and Fresno
native.
Before VCRs, There Was Armenian Radio
The Moscow Times
Friday, July 2, 2004. Page 8. Before VCRs, There Was Armenian Radio
By Michele A. Berdy
Àðìÿíñêîå ðàäèî ñïðàøèàþò: A question for Armenian radio (the opening line
in a series of Soviet-era jokes). A guy walks into a bar … .” As soon as Americans hear these words, they get
ready for a laugh (or at least a joke). For Russians, getting ready to hear
or tell a joke is one of the greatest pleasures of the culture. In the bad
old days, before VCRs, multiplex cinemas, fitness clubs and other
recreational diversions, an entertaining evening was spent with friends
sitting in the kitchen, talking about life, and, if there was a good
joke-teller (ðàññêàç÷èê) in the crowd, laughing to the point of tears over
the latest joke (àíåêäîò). Jokes are miserable (and sometimes impossible) to translate, and can be hard
even to understand. Since there’s nothing worse than sitting with a blank
expression while your friends roar with laughter, here’s a short guide to
some of the standard personages that populate Russian jokes. Many Russian jokes are based on recognizable ethnic or religious
stereotypes: the rich Georgian (of Soviet times, now replaced by the New
Russian), the slow-witted Estonian (ãîðÿ÷èé ýñòîíñêèé ïàðåíü — hot-blooded
Estonian), the greedy and slovenly Ukrainian. In one series, a Frenchman, an
American, a German and a Russian (or sometimes a Jew, Englishman or
Ukrainian) find themselves in some situation where their various national
characteristics come to light. In the Russian tradition, ×óê÷à (Chukcha, from the Far East region of
Chukotka) is equivalent to the “dumb Pollack” — definitely not politically
correct in any language. Speaking in broken Russian, he finds himself in
Moscow, far from the taiga, puzzled by modern civilization. In one joke, he
is riding a tram. îäèòåëü: Ñëåäóþùàÿ îñòàíîêà — 8-ãî Ìàðòà. ×óê÷à: À
ðàíüøå íèêàê íåëüçÿ? (Conductor: Next stop — 8th of March. Chukcha: Is
there no way we can stop any earlier?)
Jokes about the íîûé ðóññêèé (the New Russian) have petered out (probably
because they’re just not funny anymore), but during the peak period of New
Russian jokes in the ’90s, it seemed a week didn’t go by without a new
variation. New Russians are dim-witted, dedicated to shows of affluence, and
eager to spend as much money as they can. Äà íîûõ ðóññêèõ ñòðå÷àþòñÿ. Îäèí ïîêàçûàåò äðóãîìó íîûé ãàëñòóê. “Òîëüêî ÷òî êóïèë çà $3,000.” “Äóðàê! Ìîæíî áûëî êóïèòü çà óãëîì çà $4,000!” (Two New Russians meet. One shows the
other his new tie. “I bought it for $3,000.” “You idiot! You could have
bought it around the corner for $4,000!”)
In the late ’90s, there were also a series of gruesome jokes connected with
contract killings. Äà êèëëåðà ñèäÿò ïîäúåçäå, æäóò áèçíåñìåíà. Æäóò ÷àñ,
äà, òðè … äðóã îäèí ãîîðèò, “Ñëóøàé, ÿ íà÷èíàþ îëíîàòüñÿ. Íå
ñëó÷èëîñü ëè ÷òî-íèáóäü?” (Two hit men are waiting in an apartment building
entryway for a businessman. They wait an hour, two hours, three. Finally one
says to the other, “Hey, I’m getting worried. Do you think something
happened to him?”)
My favorite series of the Soviet period were “questions to Armenian Radio.”
These appeared in the 1960s, apparently the continuation of àðìÿíñêèå
çàãàäêè (literally “Armenian riddles,” something like knock-knock jokes). There were many themes (including those playing on the competitive relations
between Georgians and Armenians), but the most famous are the anti-Soviet
jokes. Àðìÿíñêîå ðàäèî ñïðàøèàþò: Ìîæíî ëè ïîñòðîèòü êîììóíèçì Àðìåíèè? Ìîæíî, íî ëó÷øå ñíà÷àëà Ãðóçèè. (A question for Armenian radio: Can
communism be built in Armenia? Yes, but it would be better to do it in
Georgia first.) Àðìÿíñêîå ðàäèî ñïðàøèàþò: Ìîæíî ëè ïîñòðîèòü êîììóíèçì? Äà, ìîæíî — íî ûæèòü ïðè í¸ì — íåëüçÿ. (A question for Armenian radio:
Can communism be built Yes, it can — but no one can survive it.) Or the
all-time classic: Êàêîé ñàìûé êîðîòêèé àíåêäîò? Îòåò: Êîììóíèçì. (What’s
the shortest joke? Answer: Communism.)
In the bad old days, that always got a laugh. Michele A. Berdy is a Moscow-based translator.
Armenian acid spill kills one, injures seven
Armenian acid spill kills one, injures seven
YEREVAN, June 30 (Reuters) – An explosion at an Armenian power station
released 9.5 tonnes of toxic sulphuric acid on Wednesday, killing one
person and injuring seven, an Emergencies Ministry official said.
The explosion struck an acid storage tank at the power station at 1540
GMT. It was unclear how much damage the acid had done to the area or
the facility, partly owned by Russian power company Unified Energy
System (EESR.RTS).
The official said people who lived near the Hrazdan power station in
the tiny mountainous south Caucasus country were not being evacuated.
06/30/04 14:38 ET
Forthcoming lecture at Haigazian University (Thursday, 15 July 2004)
PRESS RELEASE
Department of Armenian Studies, Haigazian University
Beirut, Lebanon
Contact: Ara Sanjian
Tel: 961-1-353011
Email: [email protected]
Web:
HAIGAZIAN UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF ARMENIAN STUDIES
invites to a lecture on
The Armenian Community of Abkhazia Today
(in Armenian)
by
Hratch Tchilingirian
(Judge Institute, Cambridge University)
Thursday, July 15, 2004 – 7:30 p.m.
Haigazian University Auditorium – Kantari, Beirut
N.B. Please accept this message as a personal invitation.
Haigazian University is a liberal arts institution of higher learning,
established in Beirut in 1955. For more information about its activities
you are welcome to visit its web-site at <; .
For additional information on the activities of its Department of
Armenian Studies, contact Ara Sanjian at
Analysis: Defining genocide
BBC News
Last Updated: Wednesday, 30 June, 2004, 12:03 GMT 13:03 UK
Analysis: Defining genocide
Black Africans say they are being driven from their homes in Darfur
Human rights campaigners accuse Sudan’s pro-government Arab militia of
carrying out genocide against black African residents of the Darfur region.
They are accused of forcing some one million people from their homes and
killing at least 10,000.
Many thousands more are at risk of starving due to a lack of food in the
camps where they have fled.
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has refused to use the term genocide, which
would carry a legal obligation to act.
But US Secretary of State Colin Powell said: “We see indicators and elements
that would start to move you toward a genocidal conclusion but we’re not
there yet.”
But what is genocide and when can it be applied? Some argue that the
definition is too narrow and others that the term is devalued by misuse.
UN definition
The term was coined in 1943 by the Jewish-Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin who
combined the Greek word “genos” (race or tribe) with the Latin word “cide”
(to kill).
After witnessing the horrors of the Holocaust – in which every member of his
family except his brother and himself was killed – Dr Lemkin campaigned to
have genocide recognised as a crime under international law.
Genocide is… both the gravest and greatest of the crimes against
humanity
Alain Destexhe
His efforts gave way to the adoption of the UN Convention on Genocide in
December 1948, which came into effect in January 1951.
Article Two of the convention defines genocide as “any of the following acts
committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or in part
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
The convention also imposes a general duty on states that are signatories to
“prevent and to punish” genocide.
Ever since its adoption, the UN treaty has come under fire from different
sides, mostly by people frustrated with the difficulty of applying it to
different cases.
‘Too narrow’
Some analysts argue that the definition is so narrow that none of the mass
killings perpetrated since the treaty’s adoption would fall under it.
The objections most frequently raised against the treaty include:
The convention excludes targeted political and social groups
The definition is limited to direct acts against people, and excludes acts
against the environment which sustains them or their cultural
distinctiveness
Proving intention beyond reasonable doubt is extremely difficult
UN member states are hesitant to single out other members or intervene, as
was the case in Rwanda
There is no body of international law to clarify the parameters of the
convention (though this is changing as UN war crimes tribunals issue
indictments)
The difficulty of defining or measuring “in part”, and establishing how many
deaths equal genocide
But in spite of these criticisms, there are many who say genocide is
recognisable.
In his book Rwanda and Genocide in the 20th Century, former
secretary-general of Doctors Without Borders, Alain Destexhe says: “Genocide
is distinguishable from all other crimes by the motivation behind it.
“Genocide is a crime on a different scale to all other crimes against
humanity and implies an intention to completely exterminate the chosen
group.
“Genocide is therefore both the gravest and greatest of the crimes against
humanity.”
Loss of meaning
Mr Destexhe believes the word genocide has fallen victim to “a sort of
verbal inflation, in much the same way as happened with the word fascist”.
The slaughter in Rwanda shocked the world
Because of that, he says, the term has progressively lost its initial
meaning and is becoming “dangerously commonplace”.
Michael Ignatieff, director of the Carr Centre for Human Rights Policy at
Harvard University, agrees.
“Those who should use the word genocide never let it slip their mouths.
Those who unfortunately do use it, banalise it into a validation of every
kind of victimhood,” he said in a lecture about Raphael Lemkin.
“Slavery for example, is called genocide when – whatever it was, and it was
an infamy – it was a system to exploit, rather than to exterminate the
living.”
In the Democratic Republic of Congo, a renegade commander said he captured
the town of Bukavu earlier this month to prevent a genocide of Congolese
Tutsis – the Banyamulenge.
It later transpired that fewer than 100 people had died.
The differences over how genocide should be defined, lead also to
disagreement on how many genocides actually occurred during the 20th
Century.
History of genocide
Some say there was only one genocide in the last century – the Holocaust.
Other experts give a long list of what they consider cases of genocide,
including the Soviet man-made famine of Ukraine (1932-33), the Indonesian
invasion of East Timor (1975), and the Khmer Rouge killings in Cambodia in
the 1970s.
Former Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic is on trial in The Hague, charged
with genocide in Bosnia from 1992-5.
However, some say there have been at least three genocides under the 1948 UN
convention:
The mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks between 1915-1920 – an
accusation that the Turks deny
The Holocaust, during which more than six million Jews were killed
Rwanda, where an estimated 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus died in the
1994 genocide
In the case of Bosnia, many believe that massacres occurred as part of a
pattern of genocide, though some doubt that intent can be proved in the case
of Mr Milosevic
The first case to put into practice the convention on genocide was that of
Jean Paul Akayesu, the Hutu mayor of the Rwandan town of Taba at the time of
the killings.
In a landmark ruling, a special international tribunal convicted him of
genocide and crimes against humanity on 2 September 1998.
Twenty-one ringleaders of the Rwandan genocide have now been convicted by
the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.
Milosevic denies committing genocide
Earlier this year, the war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia widened
the definition of what constitutes genocide.
General Radislav Krstic had appealed against his conviction for his role in
the killing of more than 7,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995.
But the court rejected his argument that the numbers were “too
insignificant” to be genocide – a decision likely to set an international
legal precedent.
On Darfur, Mr Powell says: “We can find the right label for it later, we
have got to deal with it now.”
But US envoy for war crimes Pierre Prosper has already started to compile a
list of those associated with the Janjaweed Arab militia.
For the moment, these are threatened with sanctions but in the future, they
may be charged with genocide, like those in Rwanda and the former
Yugoslavia.
CENN — June 30, 2004 Daily Digest
CENN – June 30, 2004 Daily Digest
Table of Contents:
1. $2bn already invested in Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline
2. Will Caspian Sea become another Aral?
3. Contest for Journalists – “Environment and Health”
4. Invitation to comment on the Municipal and environmental
infrastructure policy
5. Armenia Tree Project Celebrating 10th Anniversary
6. Commission selects Two bids for Privatization of Zangezour Smelter
7. Armrosgazprom to Bid for Laying Iran-Armenia Gas Pipeline
8. Development Approaches: Convergence of Different Paths
1. $2bn already invested in Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline
Source: RBC, June 28, 2004
Some $2bn have been spent on the project of constructing the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline, the Trend news agency reported citing
Nagit Aliyev, the President of the Azerbaijani State Oil Company (GNKAR). On
the whole, according to him, shareholders in the project will invest about
$3bn.
The current pace of construction is about 1 kilometer of a pipeline a day.
Aliyev noted that the oil pipeline would be ready for operation by the time
oil production started in the central part of the Azeri field.
The GNKAR head also declared that many European companies were interested in
the project of laying the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzerum gas pipeline. Moreover, he
mentioned that the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development had
decided to allocate a $170m credit to GNKAR to finance its share in Phase-1
of the Shakh-Deniz project and $1m on reorganizing the state company.
The construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline is planned to be
finished by the end of 2004. The capacity of the 1,760-kilometer pipelineÕ
is 50m tons of oil per year. The cost of the construction is estimated at
$2.95bn. Among shareholders in the project are BP (30.1 percent), GNKAR (25
percent), Unocal (8.9 percent), Statoil (8.71 percent), TPAO (6.53 percent),
Eni (5 percent), Total (5 percent), Itochu (3.4 percent), In³ex (2.5
percent), ConocoPhilli³s (2.5 percent) and Amerada
2. Will Caspian Sea become another Aral?
Source: United Press International, June 28, 2004
The Caspian Sea, the largest inland body of water on Earth, is in danger of
turning into an environmental dead zone, a development whose impacts would
be felt throughout Central Asia and Eastern Europe, scientists told United
Press International.
Five countries — Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkmenistan —
surround the Caspian but wastes from Russia’s industrial facilities carried
down the Volga River provide the sea with the most pollution.
The region’s oil reserves are estimated at more than 200 billion barrels,
which puts it in second place after the Middle East. Exploration and
exploitation of oil fields account for another major component of the
pollution.
In terms of oil, and from an environmental standpoint, Azerbaijan’s oil
facilities are among the worst in the world, Bahman Aghai Diba, a consultant
on international law for the World Resources Company in McLean, Va., told
UPI. Azerbaijan has been using oil resources both within and close to the
Caspian for about 80 years.
A rise in the sea’s level also has been causing problems. For example,
between 1978 and 1995, between 700 and 1,200 oil wells have been flooded in
Kazakhstan, said Alexander Bolshov, a consultant for the Atyrau branch
office of the Kazakh agency for applied ecology.
“Nobody knows an exact number of flooded oil wells,” Bolshov told UPI. Oil
is leaking out of some wells, he added.
Oil pollution levels in different parts of the Caspian are between 1.5 times
and 11.8 times the maximum permissible concentration, Bolshov said.
Copper in the northern Caspian exceeds the maximum permissible level by 3.9
times. The zinc concentration, at a short distance away from the Cheleken
Peninsula in Turkmenistan, exceeds the MPC by 7.2 times, he said.
Although copper and zinc are used as nutritional supplements, they are heavy
metals that can damage living creatures at certain concentrations and tend
to accumulate in the food chain.
Along with seals, sturgeons — fish used for food and the eggs necessary for
the caviar industry — are dying in the Caspian in large quantities. The
reason, Bolshov said, is migration of toxic substances up the food chain —
a process that tends to concentrate those substances in creatures at the
top.
“Irreversible processes will start if water pollution reaches a critical
level,” he said.
The more money that has been invested in the oil industry in Kazakhstan’s
western Atyrau province — on the northern shore of the Caspian — the
higher sickness rates have become, said Muftach Diarov, director of the
Scientific Center for Regional Ecological Problems of the Atyrau Institute
of Oil And Gas.
“The main issue is the enforcement of the existing laws,” Aghai Diba said.
“The lack of agreement on the legal regime of the Caspian Sea is hampering
the legal and enforcement efforts.”
Illegal and unregulated fishing has reduced the sturgeon stocks by more than
80 percent in the Caspian, according to Aghai Diba. The U.S. government is
considering declaring some types of the caviar producing fish as endangered
species, he added.
“Convention for the Protection of the Caspian Sea was adopted recently by
all Caspian countries but adoption itself is far from implementation,”
Ljubomir Jeftic, an environmental management expert from Croatia, told UPI.
Jeftic has evaluated two projects of the Global Environment Facility on the
Caspian for the United Nations Environment Program and for the World Bank.
Jeftic cited a lack of planned coastal development and the ability of
governments surrounding the Caspian as contributing the most damage to the
ecosystem.
“Money is a big problem,” he added.
People will finally kill the Caspian if the present pollution trend
continues, said Hamid Amirebrahimi, director of the South Caspian
Institution for Environmental Services in Tonekabon, Iran, and public
participation adviser for the Caspian Environment Program, which is governed
by a committee of representatives from the five coastal Caspian states.
“In a polluted environment, human life is also under threat,” Amirebrahimi
told UPI.
“The pollution will affect the whole area,” Aghai Diba said. “The littoral
(coastal) states must be responsible for the extent of pollution that they
cause. The Caspian Sea must get out of the status of a free garbage dump.”
Amirebrahimi considers the activity of the Caspian Environment Program and
The Framework Convention on Environment of the Caspian Sea, signed by all
Caspian littoral states in November 2003, the only hope.
“Nothing should be done, but stop the Caspian pollution,” said Ramiz
Mamedov, head of the Center for the Problems of the Caspian Sea and deputy
head of the Institute of Geography in Baku, Azerbaijan.
The waters of the Caspian would not be able to self-purify for 40 years, he
told UPI.
3. Contest for Journalists – “Environment and Health”
Source: , June 28, 2004
On Sunday, June 27 the Award Ceremony of the first contest among
journalistic works dedicated to environmental problems was held in “Mini
Golf Club”.
The competition was held under Caucasian Environmental Regional Center’s
(GRC Caucasus) project – “Media and Public Participation”. Georgian national
team of environmental journalists selected the topic of the competition –
“Environment and Health”. The jury viewed the publications published from
May 8 till June 15, 2004 and evaluated them according to three criteria.
According to competition’s conditions, three journalistic works were
presented to GRC Caucasus:
– “Garbage – Real Danger”- Otar Kiria; Newspaper “24 Hours”, 14.06.2004;
– “Georgia Faces Bioterorism” – Keti Janelidze; Magazine “Akhali Zhurnali”
(New Magazine), 12-18.06.2004
– “Malaria and Dead Forest” – Keti Bezhiashvili; TV Project “Crossroads –
Map”, 12.05.2004;
After the jury’s marks were summed up it became evident that out of maximum
30 points the three works got 25,2 points each. That’s why the authors got
equal prize money, each of them got $100. Besides, Head of Information and
Public Participation of GRC Caucasus, Eka Zghuladze gave some presents to
the contestants, including t-shirts and different paraphernalia associated
with the project.
“At the June 27 meeting Georgian Journalists’ team selected the second
competition’s topic – “Environment and Safety” under this regional project,
which is taking place in the three countries of South Caucasus” – Giorgi
Gakheladze, Project Consultant in Georgia, said.
4. Invitation to comment on the Municipal and environmental
infrastructure policy
The EBRD has started work on the revision of its Municipal and environmental
infrastructure policy. In compliance with the Bank’s Public Information
Policy comments are invited to help the Bank in revising its policy.
The document sets out the general specific and operational role of the Bank
in this sector and establishes the overall framework for the Bank’s
activities over the strategy period from 2004 – 2008. It succeeds the
Operations Policy approved by the Board on 16/17 June 1998.
Comments should refer to the current draft policy available at:
Please send your comments to the Bank at [email protected] no
later than 12 August 2004 so that they can be taken into account.
Outreach and NGO Relations Team. European Bank of Reconstruction and
Development
5. Armenia Tree Project Celebrating 10th Anniversary
Armenia Tree Project office, Yerevan
Tel: 553069 or 569910
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:
Armenia Tree Project Celebrates its 10th Anniversary with an Open Air Gala
Concert at Garni Temple
The Armenia Tree Project (ATP) and the National Chamber Orchestra of Armenia
(NCOA) under the direction of Aram Gharabekian are pleased to announce an
Open Air Evening Gala Concert at the historic site of Garni Temple, one of
the oldest historical landmarks in Armenia, built in the 1st Century BC. The
upcoming concert is in celebration of ATP’s 10th Anniversary of regreening
Armenia. President Robert Kocharian, U.S. Ambassador John Ordway and other
high-ranking government officials, ambassadors and foreign officials have
been invited to the event. Representatives from dozens of local and
international organizations who partner with ATP will be present at the
concert.
The Armenia Tree Project was founded in 1994 during Armenia’s darkest and
coldest years with the vision of securing Armenia’s future by protecting
Armenia’s environment. Funded by contributions from Diasporan Armenians, ATP
has planted and rejuvenated 530,000 trees at approximately 500 sites ranging
from Gumri to Goris. Two state-of-the-art nurseries, founded in the refugee
villages of Karin (Ashtarak area) and Khachpar (Masis Area) not only provide
40,000 – 50,000 trees annually for community tree planting all over Armenia,
but are also a major source of eployment for these refugee villages. Another
vast nursery has been established this year for providing over one million
trees annually for reforestation of the devastated landscape in Vanadzor.
Although we have accomplished much since 1994, our work in protecting and
restoring Armenia’s forests has just begun.
In 2003 ATP launched a Sustainable Mountain Development Project in the
refugee village of Aygut in the Getik River Valley in Gegharkounik Marz.. In
this program of mountainous reforestation, ATP is creating a model of
partnering with the villagers and with other international and local
organizations to combat the linked problems of poverty and natural resource
degradation. Among the contributors to date are USDA/MAP, World Food
Program, Heifer International, Project Harmony, ORRAN, Boghosian Education
Center, the Peace Corps and Satsil. ATP is expanding to all 13 villages in
the Getik River Valley, this year including the second village in the
Valley, Dzoravanq. The sub-projects being implemented include the Backyard
Nursery Project, through which villagers generate income by growing
seedlings in their backyards for reforestation, the Milk Collector Project,
Backyard Orchard Rejuvenation and Ecological Education Programs in the
schools.
Never before in history have Armenia’s forests been so close to extinction.
With only 8 % of forest cover left, down from 12% in 1990 and 25% at the
beginning of the 20th century, the World Bank estimates that the last of our
trees will be gone in only 20 years at the current rate of cutting. 81.9% of
Armenia’s land faces the danger of desertification (National Report on the
State of the Environment 2002). The future of Armenia’s forests, climate and
biodiversity rest in our hands. The actions we take now for combating
deforestation will save Armenia from the path it is on toward
desertification. The Armenia Tree Project is energizing the nation’s youth,
educating the Armenian public and the Diaspora about the nature of the
problem and possible solutions and joining forces with like minded
organizations and individuals to meet the common goal of greening Armenia
and reversing the dangerous and destabilizing trend of environmental
degradation.
6. Commission selects two bids for privatization of Zangezour
smelter
Source: ArmenPress, June 29, 2004
An inter-agency commission, set up to handle the privatization of Zangezour
smelter, has examined today privatization bids, received from potential
buyers, Armenian trade and economic development ministry said, adding that
two of proposed bids met all requirements set by the government. The
ministry said it will consider both and has demanded additional information
from both companies to submitted within ten days. Both selected companies
say they are ready to pay $25 million in advance before starting takeover
talks.
Plans for privatization of the plant were announced by the government last
March and were officially presented to over 40 potential buyers at a special
conference held in London late March.
The government expects to net at least $450 million in cash and investment
commitments from the sale of Armenia’s largest copper and molybdenum mines.
A prospective buyer will be expected to pay $100 million for the Kajaran
plant’s shares and pledge to invest more than $350 million in modernizing
its obsolete technological lines.
7. Armrosgazprom to bid for laying Iran-Armenia gas pipeline
Source: RosBusinessConsulting, June 29, 2004
The company Armrosgazprom is planning to take part in a tender on
constructing and maintaining an Iran-Armenia gas pipeline, the press service
of the company reported. The customer of the gas pipeline is the Armenian
government. A basic agreement on laying the pipeline was signed in Yerevan
(Armenia) on May 13, 2004. According to the document, the gas pipeline will
be put into operation by January 1, 2007. Armenia will get some 1.1bn cubic
meters of gas annually through this pipeline. Each country is to finance the
laying of a pipeline on its territory. Armenia is expected to spend about
$90m to $100m and Iran some $120m on constructing the pipeline.
Armrosgazprom was created in 1997 in compliance with a Russian-Armenian
government agreement and it is the exclusive wholesale buyer and supplier of
gas in Armenia. The Armenian government and Gazprom have a 45-percent stake
each in the company; Itera has a 10-percent block of shares. Armrosgazprom
owns the whole gas distributing network in the republic.
8. Development Approaches: Convergence of Different Paths
Source: IUCN, June 29, 2004
The 4th Regional Session of the Global Biodiversity Forum in Asia was held
in Manila, Philippines 21-23 June, 2004. The key findings of the forum were
that development planning and sustainable development strategies do not have
much meaning for local communities. Communities strive for the betterment of
livelihoods irrespective of whether Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers
(PRSPs) will help achieve their aims or whether Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs) serve as frameworks. Only global organizations and national
governments use these approaches combined with national plans for
conservation. Since communities do not understand these terms and processes,
ownership of the communities in achieving these goals are often lacking.
With more than 60 people from 11 countries participating, the delegates
deliberated on the need to make conservation and development work together
for local people rather than to fulfill global obligations.
CENN INFO
Caucasus Environmental NGO Network (CENN)
Tel: ++995 32 92 39 46
Fax: ++995 32 92 39 47
E-mail: [email protected]
URL:
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Beware Russia’s pocket empire
Christian Science Monitor
July 1 2004
Beware Russia’s pocket empire
By Daniel C. Twining
WASHINGTON – Last weekend, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
visited Moldova, a country where the cold war never ended. His trip
highlighted the threat to Western values and interests posed by
Russia’s ambition to retain control over strategic European enclaves
it once ruled as part of the Soviet empire.
It is a reminder that despite the success of NATO’s Istanbul summit,
the West has not completed its grand geopolitical project of building
a Europe of secure democracies extending to the borders of Russia.
Russia’s nostalgia for its imperial past is evident in the pocket
empire it maintains among neighboring nations. These imperial
aspirations stifle democratic development on Europe’s borders and
repudiate the values necessary for lasting partnership between Moscow
and the West.
Moldova, where a slice of the Soviet Union survives in the
secessionist Transdniestria region, is just such a case. When the
USSR collapsed 13 years ago, Moldova became an independent nation.
But the 14th Soviet Army stayed on in the region, along the border
with Ukraine, to support Transdniestria’s secession from Moldova.
Former apparatchik Igor Smirnov turned his autocratic fiefdom into a
client state of Moscow. Today, Russian forces guard Transdniestria’s
borders, Russian officers command its Army, Russian troops guard an
enormous Soviet arms depot, and Russia provides free energy supplies.
President Smirnov answers to leaders in Moscow, many of whom
allegedly profit from the international criminal network that
operates in the area.
According to Western officials in the region, Transdniestria is a
leading exporter of kidnapped women to Europe, a lucrative transit
territory for illicit drugs, and a key link in the arms-smuggling
network that peddles the Soviet Union’s former military hardware on
the international market. If Al Qaeda has not gone shopping there
yet, it is only a matter of time.
Why does Russia support this illegitimate regime? In negotiations
last fall that nearly resulted in a settlement recognizing the
criminal regime’s claim to federal status within Moldova, Moscow
showed its hand by demanding that Moldova commit to a treaty
legalizing the presence of Russian military forces on its soil until
2020. Thanks to Western pressure and the resistance of Moldovans who
took to the streets in protest, the deal collapsed. Nonetheless,
political reform in Moldova has been frozen by the Transdniestria
crisis, which focuses the West’s attention on conflict resolution
rather than on democratic change.
Russia’s Transdniestria strategy mirrors its approach to the other
“frozen conflicts” sustained by Russian military forces and political
support – two secessionist provinces in Georgia and the disputed
enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
Moscow’s ambition is to make it seem normal for Russian troops to
guard European borders and serve as outposts of imperial control in
independent nations, without their consent.
In the absence of treaties legitimizing Russia’s illegal military
presence on its neighbors’ territory, Russia will keep these
conflicts “frozen” – ensuring that secessionist leaders who answer to
Moscow remain in control.
As Mr. Rumsfeld said clearly last weekend, Russia’s troop presence
violates the revised Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe and
post-Soviet guarantees Russia made to withdraw military forces from
the territories of its neighbors.
A Western campaign to resolve the frozen conflicts and democratize
Europe’s borderlands could be a new pillar of transatlantic
cooperation. NATO should deepen its Partnership for Peace programs in
this region and put the frozen conflicts on the agenda of the
NATO-Russia Council. The European Union should put meat on the bones
of its “New Neighborhood Policy” by tackling the conflicts and
committing substantial assistance for democratic change in its
backyard.
Together, the United States and Europe should condition deeper
Russian access to Western markets on Moscow’s willingness to
negotiate democratic political solutions to Europe’s frozen
conflicts. The transatlantic democracies should also condition
Russia’s privileged political relationship with Western institutions
like NATO, the EU, and the Group of Seven (the world’s richest
nations) on Moscow’s demonstrated willingness to act responsibly in
its near abroad – including the expeditious and verifiable withdrawal
of Russian military forces from the conflict zones.
As part of any political solution in these countries, the West should
insist on nationwide democratic elections, both because it is right
and to reassure Russia that populations in the secessionist regions
it claims to “protect” have a full voice in their reunified nation’s
future.
Russia must understand that its cold war rules of statecraft do not
apply in an age when it seeks partnership with the West – and when
states on the old Soviet borders aspire to membership in an imperium
centered on Brussels, not Moscow.
Despite Russian opposition to enlargement of NATO and the EU, the
progress of democracy, reform, and security across Central and
Eastern Europe during the past decade has made Russia more secure,
not less. Resolving Europe’s frozen conflicts and building stable
democracies throughout the geostrategic gray zone on Russia’s borders
would have a similar effect. Conversely, acceding to Russia’s desire
for a new sphere of influence in its old imperial stomping grounds
would not make Russia more secure. It would not make an increasingly
authoritarian Russia more susceptible to Western values. It would, in
fact, make the West complicit in their subversion.
– Daniel C. Twining, a former foreign policy adviser to Republican
Sen. John McCain, is a director at the German Marshall Fund of the
US. The views expressed here are his own and are informed by a
fact-finding trip he took to Moldova in May.