Vahan Hovhannisyan Unhappy About Terri Davis Report

VAHAN HOVHANNISYAN UNHAPPY ABOUT TERRI DAVIS REPORT

A1 Plus
24-09-2004

Vahan Hovhannisyan, one of Dashnaktsutyun party leaders, speaking
Friday in National Press Club voiced his discontent with views of the
CE reporter on Nagorno Karabakh Terri Davis.

`His latest report is composed by oil companies. It doesn’treflect the
CE point of view’, Hovhannisyan said.

The Dashnak expressed his concern about the fact that the CE
new-appointed reporter is British too. `I fear him to be guided by his
predecessor’s report’, he said.

Journalists asked what American Steven Mann, OSCE Minsk Group’s
co-chair, said in his interview with BBC radio station, in which he
accused Armenia of taking too isolating stance in the region
integration process and deterringitself from roads and oil pipelines
construction.

`Nothing new’, the answer was.

Torossian Disapproves Davis’ Report

TOROSSIAN DISAPPROVES DAVIS’ REPORT

Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic (NKR)
24 Sept 04

Last week the problem of Karabakh conflict was discussed not only in
Astana but also in Paris. Here during the September 13-15 session of
the PACE Political Commission British parliamentarian David Atkinson
was appointed reporter on Nagorni Karabakh. His predecessor Terry
Davis was elected general secretaryof the Council of Europe in summer
and during the session last week Terry Davis presented his
document. The discussion of the document was postponed because of the
election of Davis. The delegation of Armenia headed by the vice
speaker of the RA National Assembly Tigran Torossian has already
returned to Yerevan. meeting with journalists Mr. Torossian resented
the details of the report of the former PACE reporter on Nagorni
Karabakh Terry Davis, which, according to him, contains unfavourable
statements for the Armenian party. `If there is something bad about
the report than for Armenia and Azerbaijan, such as thepoint about
ethnic cleansing’, which is, according to Tigran Torossian,
unacceptable for the Karabakh conflict. There are no unfavourable
statements for Armenia only, according to Tigran Torossian, `but there
is a positive pointfor Armenia and Nagorni Karabakh’ in which the PACE
calls the Azerbaijani authorities to establish relationships with the
political forces of Karabakh and discuss the future status of Nagorni
Karabakh, which caused discontentment in Azerbaijan. According to the
head of the Armenian delegation in Paris, even if there are
unfavourable points in Davis’ report, these will not produce any
consequences because the report does not have a legal force. By the
way, the author of the report mentioned that he was presenting the
report of a parliamentarian appointed a reporter, therefore it should
not be perceived as an opinion ofthe general secretary. The report has
no legal force and after being presented to the commission it was sent
to the archives. `Perhaps the document has ahistorical and cognitive
value and is valuable in the sense that we must plan our later works
with the consideration that similar opinions may be formed,’ said
Tigran Torossian during the press conference. According to him, `it
was not discussed and did not become a document of the commission,
that is to say it is the opinion of a member of parliament.’ And in
order to avoid similar incorrect opinions and achieve a reflection of
the real picture in the new report, inhis address in Paris Tigran
Torossian suggested the new reporter visiting the region before
preparing the report, getting acquainted with the situation, as wellas
meeting with the cochairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group, organizing a
round table on the settlement of the Karabakh problem with the
participation of Nagorni Karabakh by all means. `At the same time, in
my address I suggestedorganizing meetings of the reporter with the
representatives of Nagorni Karabakh, the representatives of Armenia
and Azerbaijan, the cochairmen of the Minsk Group.’ The latter is
very important because, unfortunately, in the suggestions of Mr.
Davis certain problems occurred in reference to the Minsk
Group. According to Torossian, his suggestion was endorsed by Terry
Davis and newly appointed reporter Atkinson. By the way, the latter
will present his document at the January session of the PACE. The
British delegate will obviously not manage to get a complete idea of
Nagorni Karabakh and the conflict without assistance. Tigran Torossian
said that hopefully through active collaboration with the British
delegate it will be possible to achieve a document which will reflect
the reality and will differ from the former, including the positive
ideas of Davis and excluding mistakes.

CHRISTINE MNATSAKANIAN.
24-09-2004

Russia Charges 3 in Twin Plane Bombings

Russia Charges 3 in Twin Plane Bombings

.c The Associated Press

MOSCOW (AP) – Prosecutors charged three people Friday in connection
with last month’s bombings of two Russian airliners, the Interfax news
agency reported.

The two planes blew up almost simultaneously on the night of Aug. 24,
killing 90 people.

It was the start of a series of deadly terrorist attacks blamed on
Chechen rebels that killed nearly 440 people, including the school
siege in the southern city of Beslan.

Police Capt. Mikhail Artamonov, arrested earlier this month, was
charged with negligence that led to fatalities, Interfax said, quoting
prosecutors. Artamonov is accused of releasing the two women
suspected of carrying bombs onto the planes without inspecting their
belongings.

Two patrolmen had turned the women over to him, presumably because of
their Chechen ethnicity, which often results in extra police checks.

After being let go, the women allegedly obtained tickets from a ticket
scalper at Moscow’s Domodedovo airport, Prosecutor General Vladimir
Ustinov said earlier this month. The scalper then gave part of the
money he received from the women – equivalent to $34 – to an airline
employee to get them on the planes, Ustinov said.

The airline employee, Nikolai Korenkov, and the ticket scalper, Armen
Arutyunian, were arrested earlier this month. Both were charged Friday
with complicity in terrorism, Interfax said.

09/24/04 15:34 EDT

ANKARA: EU Process will not Stand any more Mistakes

Zaman, Turkey
Sept 24 2004

EU Process will not Stand any more Mistakes

SELCUK GULTASLI

The last 15 days have been really exciting for us in Turkey. All of
Europe took Turkey’s future membership under the microscope because
of the “adultery” [issue]. Many things were said.

Christian Democrats, Armenians, and Greeks were madly pleased. This
debate showed the real face of Turkey, they said, and Europe was
barely saved.

Turkey on the other hand tried to decipher the profound diplomatic
secret code in Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s insistence [on
the adultery issue]. In the end, the issue was resolved with European
Union (EU) Enlargement Commissioner Gunter Verheugen’s statement, “No
more obstacles before Turkey.” Perhaps Turkey’s 45 years of hope were
saved in the nick of the time.

By looking at positive and negative aspects of the last 15 days, we
should draw a road map for ourselves over the next three months.

Let’s try to see this crisis from a positive angle. Even if, as it is
written in the Financial Times the other day, Erdogan jeopardized the
biggest strategic objective of the country simply to test his
personal authority, he prevented the EU from imposing other
conditions with a single strategy. Therefore, the requirements were
clarified in order for the progress report to come out “clean” and no
more gray areas remain. Because of the adultery issue, the camps for
and against Turkey crystallized more. Those who could not speak
before now had the chance to show themselves by taking on the
“adultery” issue. We have seen our enemies and friends once more and
now can better identify friend and foe. With this crisis, we have
seen that regardless of how well Turkey does its homework, little
things will be made to turn into bigger issues; the tolerance that
has been shown to some [EU] candidates will not be shown to Ankara;
Turkey will crash if it trembles, and the biggest friends of Turkey
will start to sway in the moments of such crisis. Ankara saw once
more that it has to take these realities into consideration and play
its role before the EU.

The most negative side of the crisis is that the reliability of
Erdogan, who has been regarded as the most “reformist” politician
according to some after Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and to others after
Turgut Ozal, was harmed.

His easily taking a step back in Brussels reinforced Erdogan’s former
style of politics. For a while it seemed as if he had adopted a
political path from the past. Even if the crisis ends, its harm
continues. Since November 3 [2002], the Justice and Development Party
(AKP) had never let Turkey be looked down upon until it let the
initiative to EU in the subject of reforms that made Ankara a
candidate take a hit once again with this crisis. The “adultery”
discussion paved the way for the anti-Turkey campaigns to begin
early.

We will discuss for a long time whether this debate stemmed from the
personal ambitions of Erdogan or appeared out of profound and subtle
tactical calculations; however, the most important lesson to be
learnt is that Turkey must tread carefully, knowing that the upcoming
three months will be very sensitive and unlikely to stand another
crisis.

As The Times wrote, enemies should be served equipment while the EU
has started to dig the trenches for the toughest fights through
Turkey.

UCLA: Recent PhDs in Middle East Studies

UCLA International Institute, CA
Sept 24 2004

Recent PhDs in Middle East Studies

Twenty-one students have completed PhDs in Middle East studies in the
past three years, in the departments of Art History, Comparative
Literature, Ethnomusicology, History, Near Eastern Languages and
Cultures, Political Science and the Islamic Studies Program.

Diane James

Avner Ben Zaken (History, 2004), `The Angelus Novus of Early Modern
Science: The Past, the East and the Circulation of Post-Copernican
Astronomy in the Eastern Mediterranean, 1560-1660.’ Avner is
conducting postgraduate research as a Junior Fellow (2004-06) in the
Harvard Society of Fellows.

Sandra Campbell (Islamic Studies, 2003), `Telling Memories: The
Zubayrids in Islamic Historical Memory.’

Cynthia Skvorec Colburn (Art History, 2003), “The Art of Interaction:
Distance and Social Status in Prepalatial Crete.” Cynthia is Visiting
Professor of Art History, Pepperdine University, Malibu.

Jacob Dahl (NELC, 2003), “The Ruling Family of Ur III Umma: A
Prosopographical Analysis of a Provincial Elite Family in Southern
Iraq ca. 2100-2000 BC.” Jacob was awarded a fellowship by the Centre
National de la Recherche Scientifique for postgraduate research at
the Musée du Louvre in Paris.

Lynn Swartz Dodd (NELC, 2002), “The Ancient Past in the Ancient
Present: Cultural Identity in Gurgum during the Late Bronze Age-Early
Iron Age Transition in North Syria.” Lynn is Visiting Assistant
Professor in the School of Religion and Curator of the Archaeological
Research Collection at the University of Southern California.

Howard Eissenstat (History, 2004), `Imagining a New Nation: Range of
Discourse in the Development of Turkish Nationalism, 1920-1945.’
Howard is Assistant Professor of Middle Eastern History in the
Department of History, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point.

Roger Good (NELC, 2003), `The Septuagint’s Translation of the Hebrew
Verbal System in Chronicles.’

Karen Gumberg (Comparative Literature, 2004), `Poetics of Place:
Unraveling Home and Exile in Jewish Literature from Israel and the
United States.’ Karen is Assistant Professor of Hebrew Literature in
the Department of Middle Eastern Studies, University of Texas at
Austin.

Kathleen Hood (Ethnomusicology, 2002), “Music and Memory in a Global
Age: Wedding Songs of the Syrian Druzes.”

George Kooshian (History, 2002), “The Armenian Immigrant Community of
California, 1880-1935.” George teaches English as a Second Language
in the Los Angeles Unified School District.

Fred Mabie (NELC, 2004), `Ancient Near Eastern Scribes and the
Mark(s) They Left: A Catalog and Analysis of Scribal Auxiliary Marks
in the Amarna Corpus and in the Cuneiform Alphabetic Texts of Ugarit
and Ras Ibn Hani.’ Fred is an Assistant Professor at Biola University
in La Mirada, California.

Afshin Marashi (History, 2003), “Nationalizing Iran: Culture, Power,
and the State, 1870-1941.” Afshin is Assistant Professor of History,
California State University, Sacramento.

Kerry Muhlestein (NELC, 2003), `Violence in the Service of Order: The
Religious Framework for Sanctioned Killing in Ancient Egypt.’ Kerry
is Assistant Professor of Religion and History, Brigham Young
University, Hawaii.

Firoozeh Papan-Matin (NELC, 2004), `Death, Vision and the Self in
`Ayn al-Qudat Hamadhania.’ Firoozeh teaches Iranian Studies in the
Department of Religious Studies, University of California, Santa
Barbara.

Nahid Pirnazar (NELC, 2003), `The Place of the Fifteenth-Century
Judeo-Persian Religious Epic Emrani’s Fathnameh in Iranian Literary
Traditions.’

Heidi Rutz (Islamic Studies, 2003), “Orders from God? The
Implications of Ethno-religious Discourse and Transnational Networks
on Group Mobilization and Violence.” Heidi is an Assistant Professor
in the US Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island.

Sonia Tamar Seeman (Ethnomusicology, 2002), “You’re Roman: Music and
Identity in Turkish Roman Communities.” Sonia is a Postdoctoral
Faculty Fellow in Ethnomusicology at the University of California,
Santa Barbara, and performs with the UCSB Middle East Ensemble.

David Simonowitz (Islamic Studies, 2004), `On the Cutting Edges of
Dhu’l-Fiqar: Authority and the Discourse of Architecture in the
Musta`li-Tayyibi and Nizari Communities.’

Abdulkader Sinno (Political Science, 2002), “Organizing to Win: How
Organizational Structure Affects the Outcome of Strategic Interaction
in Politicized Group Conflicts.” Abdulkader is Assistant Professor of
Political Science and Middle Eastern Studies at Indiana University in
Bloomington.

Julie Taylor (Political Science, 2004), `Prophet Sharing: Strategic
Interaction between Islamic Clerics and Middle Eastern Regimes.’
Julie is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Near Eastern
Studies, Princeton University.

Hussam Timani (Islamic Studies, 2002), “The Khawarij in Modern
Islamic Historiography.” Hussam teaches Middle East History at
California State College, San Marcos.

ANKARA: Gul: We Have No Plan B About EU

Anadolu Agency
Sept 24 2004

Gul: We Have No Plan B About EU

NEW YORK – “The government does not have `plan B` in case it fails
to win a date from the European Union (EU) for start of entry
talks,“ Turkish Foreign Minister & Deputy Prime Minister Abdullah
Gul said on Friday.

Gul addressed the Turkish-American Business Forum in New York.

Asked if the Turkish government has `plan B` in case the EU makes a
negative decision about Turkey in December, Gul said, “we have no
such plan. We have reached the end of our forty-year work. We have no
energy to prepare such a plan after current stage. Turkey`s EU target
has not come out with dream or desire. We should be realistic. We
wrote down the criteria required for it one by one. We crossed out an
article we have completed. Now that we see that the things we should
fulfill lessened. Besides, the European leaders know the consequences
and negative impacts of a negative political decision after all the
conditions are met.“

Stating that end of 2004 would be recorded as an important turning
point in Turkey`s history, Gul said, “Turkey and EU will start talks
on full membership. No obstacle remained in front of it. The same
conditions should be imposed on Turkey as other members.“

Gul said, “I can say that political criteria are met in Turkey.
There has been very significant developments in economic conditions.
There is no more obstacle to start negotiations. European leaders
know this very well. All those changes will be reflected in the
commission report. A political decision will be made and negotiations
will start without losing time. This will be the start of a new
period in Turkey.“

Gul stated that there was a realistic, rational and resolved
government in Turkey.

Stating that Turkish community in the United States should be
strengthened, Gul said, “the more strength you gain here, the more
you will be beneficial to Turkey.“

Gul said there has been a transformation in Turkey, and stressed that
this transformation is not only in political area but also in
economy, culture, arts, and social life.

Emphasizing that confidence was provided in economy, Gul said on the
one hand inflation rate was dropped, and on the other hand economic
growth was around 13-14 percent. “This is an economic miracle,“ Gul
said.

Replying to a question, Gul said one of the most significant policies
of the government was improvement of relations with neighboring
countries.

“Security problems should be solved for economic development. With
this objective, the region should turn into a secure region. This can
only be provided with positive relations,“ Gul pointed out.

“The government set up sincere relations with whole Islam and Arab
world. There has been incredible increases in our trade as a result
of this. This was reflected in political atmosphere. Positive
relations are also very important for global peace. Islam countries
closely follow reforms in Turkey. I believe that the reforms will
have positive effects on those countries,“ Gul underlined.

Replying to another question, Gul said he was against use of nuclear
energy as weapon, and stated that, “we suggest this to Iran in a
friendly manner. We want the region to be purified from nuclear
weapons.“

Gul said Turkey`s relations improved with its neighbors in the
Caucasus, stating that Armenia should withdraw from the Azerbaijani
territories for normalization of relations. “Both Armenia and
Azerbaijan want Turkey to be active for resolution of this problem,“
Gul said, stating that Turkey exerted efforts for resolution of this
problem.

Saakashvili Telephones Erdogan

Agence France Presse
Sept 24 2004

Saakashvili Telephones Erdogan
AFP: 9/24/2004

ANKARA – Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili telephoned Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Friday to thank him for
conveying some problems of Georgia to European Commission President
Romano Prodi, sources said.

Saakashvili said this approach of Turkey would have positive impacts
on commercial relations between Turkey and Georgia. Georgian
President expressed readiness to improve relations.

Saakashvili also mentioned problems in the Caucasus and stated that
one of the most important problems was Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict.
He said occupation of Upper Karabakh should end.

ANCA: Presidential Contenders Mark 13th Anniv of Armenian Indep.

Armenian National Committee of America
888 17th St., NW, Suite 904
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Fax: (202) 775-5648
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet:

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 24, 2004
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918

Presidential Contenders Mark 13th
Anniversary of Armenian Independence

WASHINGTON, DC – President George W. Bush and Sen. John Kerry
congratulated the Armenian people on the 13th anniversary of
Armenian independence, reported the Armenian National Committee of
America (ANCA). On September 21, 1991, the Republic of Armenia
declared its independence from the Soviet Union, beginning a new
chapter in Armenia’s over 3000-year history.

“We want to thank President Bush and Senator Kerry for joining with
Armenian Americans from across the country in marking the 13th
anniversary of Armenia’s rebirth, in 1991, as an independent
state,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “Their
remarks underscore the powerful bipartisan American consensus in
support of further strengthening the U.S.-Armenia relationship and
fostering the enduring bonds – born of shared values – between the
American and Armenian peoples.”

In a statement released this week, Democratic Presidential nominee
John Kerry stated, “Time and again, Armenians have demonstrated
the ability of the human spirit to triumph over adversity and even
to persist in the face of genocide. I salute the courage and
independence of the Armenian people.” Earlier this year, Sen.
Kerry had also marked the independence of the first Republic of
Armenia (1918-1920), celebrated on May 28th, noting that: “The first
Republic of Armenia rose 86 years ago from the ashes of the
Armenian genocide, but was partitioned soon afterwards. Yet,
Armenians yearned for independence, and seven decades later
realized their dream of self-determination.”

In his message to Armenian President Robert Kocharian, President
Bush cited Armenia as a “key partner with the United States.” He
specifically cited Armenia’s assistance in the war against terror
and impending deployment of non-combatant troops to Iraq. “I look
forward to enhancing the cooperation between our countries and
strengthening the deep ties of friendship between our people,”
concluded President Bush.

The complete text of the statements by both President Bush and Sen.
Kerry are provided below.

####

——————————————————————-
Statement by Democratic Presidential Candidate John Kerry Marking
Armenian Independence Day
——————————————————————-

“This past week marked Armenian Independence Day. Time and again,
Armenians have demonstrated the ability of the human spirit to
triumph over adversity and even to persist in the face of genocide.
I salute the courage and independence of the Armenian people.

“From California to Massachusetts, Armenian Americans have made
great contributions to our country in business, politics, science,
and the arts. I have been a long-time supporter of Armenia in the
United States Senate. As president, I will continue to strengthen
the ties between our countries.”

—————————————————-
Message by President George W. Bush to President
—————————————- ————

Dear Mr. President:

I extend to you and to all the people of Armenia congratulations on
the thirteenth anniversary of your nation’s independence on
September 21.

Today, an independent Armenia is a key partner with the United
States. I am particularly grateful for the important counter-
terrorism assistance that Armenia has rendered to the United States
as well as your offer to supply non-combat troops to Iraq this
fall. I look forward to seeing you troops on the ground soon.

The United States will work tirelessly to assist the government and
people of Armenia in their efforts to achieve economic growth,
build democratic institutions and resolve the crippling Nagorno
Karabakh conflict. I look forward to enhancing the cooperation
between our countries and strengthening the deep ties of friendship
between our people.

Sincerely,

George W. Bush

www.anca.org

Armenian Amb Visits UConn, Discusses Prospects for Arm Studies Prog.

PRESS RELEASE
September 24, 2004
Embassy of the Republic of Armenia
2225 R Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20008
Tel: 202-319-1976, x. 348; Fax: 202-319-2982
Email: [email protected]; Web:

Armenian Ambassador Visits University of Connecticut, Discusses Prospects
for Armenian Studies program

Armenian Ambassador to the U.S., Dr. Arman Kirakossian visited the
University of Connecticut on September 22-23, 2004, as part of the Embassy’s
outreach to the U.S. academic and research institutions. Ambassador
Kirakossian’s visit, at the invitation of University President Philip E.
Austin, aimed to discuss prospects for establishment of Armenian Studies
program at the University and inaugurate its partnership program with the
Yerevan State University (YSU).

The University of Connecticut and Yerevan State University have successfully
cooperated for fifteen years, as the University of Connecticut’s School of
Social Work helped to introduce social work program at the YSU Sociology
Department. To expand on this successful record of collaboration, an
Armenian Studies Development Committee was established at the University of
Connecticut in 2000, with its activities focusing on establishment of
Armenian Studies program at the University of Connecticut and developing
programs on Geographical Information Systems at the YSU. Recently, the
Norian Endowment Fund has been created through a generous donation by the
late Mrs. Alice Norian with the purpose of facilitating the Armenian Studies
program at the University.

During his visit to the University, Ambassador Kirakossian met with
University President Austin and members of faculty. The Armenian Ambassador
expressed his full support and endorsement for the establishment of the
Armenian Studies program at the University, noting that it should facilitate
greater collaboration between the Armenian and foreign researchers and
promote curricula and research relevant to challenges facing modern-day
Armenia.

On September 23, Ambassador Kirakossian addressed the faculty and student
body assembled at the University of Connecticut’s Dodd Center. In his
lecture, entitled “U.S.-Armenian Relations: Current Realities and Vision for
Future,” the Armenian Ambassador presented historical background and current
agenda of the U.S.-Armenian bilateral relations in political, economic,
military, security, and cultural areas, within the greater context of
Armenia’s foreign policy. Dr. Kirakossian presented Armenia’s political and
economic progress since restoration of independence in 1991, as well as
challenges facing modern Armenia, including the peaceful resolution of the
Nagorno Karabakh conflict. He expressed his confidence in the strength and
future prospects for U.S.-Armenian relations, noting that underlying them
are “shared values and principles, like freedom, democracy, advancement of
human rights, and free enterprise.” He said he hoped the University of
Connecticut’s Armenian Studies program will promote greater collaboration
between U.S. and Armenian researchers, contributing to enhancement of the
bilateral ties between our nations.

Also present at the event was prominent author Peter Balakian, who read
excerpts from his recent books, “Black Dog of Fate” and “The Burning
Tigris.”

During his visit to Connecticut, Ambassador Kirakossian met with State
Representative John C. Geragosian, Assistant Majority Leader in the
Connecticut General Assembly, who was recently elected as Vice President of
the Armenian Parliamentary Union during its inaugural congress in Yerevan.

www.armeniaemb.org

Armenia and Russia restore scientific links

RIA Novosti, Russia
Sept 24 2004

ARMENIA AND RUSSIA RESTORE SCIENTIFIC LINKS

YEREVAN, September 24, (RIA Novosti’s Gamlet Matevosyan) –
Prime-Minister of Armenia Andranik Markaryan received on Friday a
delegation of academic institutions of higher learning of the South
Federal District of Russia led by President of the Southern research
center of the Russian Academy of Sciences academician Gennady
Matischev. As RIA Novosti was told on Friday at the public relations
and press department of the Armenian government’s staff, during the
meeting Markaryan highlighted the necessity of restoring scientific
links between Armenia and Russia, promoting cooperation in social
sciences and, in particular, in the sphere of the regional policy
research.

Markaryan pointed out a great significance of the agreement signed in
June of this year between the Armenian National Academy of Sciences
and the Southern research center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
on cooperation in the field of science and technologies, in
particular in astrophysics, power engineering, the study of the
ecological state of the Armenian lake Sevan and the restoration of
life in it, as well as creating an efficient computation system.

In his turn, Matischev noted that directions and trends in the
development of science and technologies in the two states coincide,
which makes it possible to set feasible tasks and solve them
efficiently.

The prime minister confirmed the Armenian government’s readiness to
promote links between the research centers of the two states and
stressed that the Armenian-Russian non-governmental commission for
economic cooperation would be of great help in this.