Armenia ready for 2005 Expo

ArmenPress
March 4 2005

ARMENIA READY FOR 2005 EXPO

YEREVAN, MARCH 4, ARMENPRESS: A press secretary of the Armenian
Development Agency (ADA) told Armenpress Armenia will be represented
widely at 2005 Expo-2005 in Japanese Aichi, that is to be held under
the theme Nature’s Wisdom from March 25 to September 25, 2005.
More than 120 countries and numerous international organizations
have announced plans to take part in the first World Exposition of
the twenty-first century and will be holding their exhibitions in
Global Commons, common areas that group participants together by
region and provide both individual and shared space.
The six Global Commons are connected via the Global Loop, which
will allow visitors to enjoy a virtual trip around the world. Global
Common Three is home to countries located in Europe and the
Mediterranean.
ADA press secretary, Suzan Gevorkian, said Armenia will be
showcased in a pavilion that has 162 square meters. She said Armenia
is fully prepared for exposition.
Armenia’s participation in the exposition is being steered by the
ADA. Armenia’s national day will be marked on June 7. An Armenian
delegation will travel to Japan to stage a variety of cultural and
other events.

OSCE could play key role in Kosovo’s standards review process

ReliefWeb, Switzerland
March 4 2005

Source: United Nations Security Council

OSCE could play key role in Kosovo’s standards review process,
Security council told SC/8328

Chairman Briefs Council on Organization’s Expertise In Minority
Issues, Policing, Institution-Building, Conflict Resolution

As an integral part of the structure of the United Nations Interim
Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) could play a key role in
the province’s standards review process while remaining part of the
international presence there, the regional body’s Chairman-in-Office
told the Security Council this morning.

Dimitrij Rupel, who is also Slovenia’a Minister for Foreign Affairs,
said in an open briefing to the Council that the OSCE had
considerable expertise in national minority issues, policing and in
building the effective public institutions that were so essential for
Kosovo’s peaceful and sustainable development. In many tense
situations, effective policing was needed rather than blue helmets.
The OSCE ran police development units in the western Balkans, and no
other international organization currently possessed the potential to
strengthen long-term law enforcement capacity- and
institution-building in the States most susceptible to crime,
corruption and human rights violations.

The case of Kosovo highlighted the question of reconciling the desire
for self-determination with the issue of preserving the territorial
integrity of States, he said. And in parts of the Republic of
Moldova, Georgia and in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh,
the OSCE was actively trying to resolve conflicts that were sometimes
referred to as frozen, but which lately had started to thaw. The slow
but steady progress being made in the dialogue between Armenia and
Azerbaijan was encouraging, and it was to be hoped that recent
changes in Ukraine and a new post-election environment in the
Republic of Moldova would enable a new attempt to resolve the
Transdniestrian conflict. The OSCE was also working with parties to
reduce tensions in South Ossetia, Georgia, and to promote
demilitarization, build confidence and achieve a lasting settlement
there.

Urging the Security Council to support OSCE efforts in all those
cases, particularly those Council members who were mediators in the
conflicts or had influence over the parties, he pointed out that it
was difficult for inter-State organizations to deal with non-State
actors, even when they were de facto authorities, and that,
sometimes, the leverage of powerful States, including permanent
members of the Council, could be crucial. The OSCE was a regional
arrangement in the sense of Chapter VIII of the United Nations
Charter and it was to be hoped that bold decisions would be taken to
enhance further the cooperation between the United Nations and
regional organizations.

He said the Security Council’s ability to more proactively prevent
and respond to threats could be strengthened by making fuller and
more productive use of regional organizations. The OSCE was
well-positioned and well-equipped to do so with its well-earned
reputation in early warning, early action and conflict prevention.
There were areas, such as preventing ethnic conflict and regulating
the marking and tracing, as well as the brokering and transfer of
small arms and light weapons, where the organization was even more
progressive than United Nations standards.

Regarding the clash between the concept of `responsibility to
protect’ and the principle of non-intervention in the internal
affairs of a State, he said the OSCE was very clear and progressive
when it came to human rights. Commitments undertaken in the
organization’s human dimension were of direct and legitimate concern
to all participating States and did not belong exclusively to the
internal affairs of the State concerned. That legitimate
intrusiveness was the basis on which participating States held each
other accountable for the implementation of their commonly agreed
commitments.

Others who spoke during the meeting included the representatives of
Romania, United States, Russian Federation and the United Kingdom.

This morning’s meeting began at 10:20 a.m. and adjourned at 11:10
a.m.

Statement by Chairman-in-Office of OSCE

DIMITRIJ RUPEL, Chairman-in-Office of the Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and Minister for Foreign Affairs of
Slovenia, noted that there was a lively discussion about the future
of the OSCE, which, unfortunately, was reflective of the emergence of
new East-West fault lines. Some debates were reminiscent of the cold
war. The discussion had come during a year when the organization was
supposed to be celebrating its contribution to promoting security and
cooperation in Europe — reflecting on 30 years since the signing of
the Helsinki Final Act and 15 years since the Charter of Paris set
out a vision for a Europe whole and free.

As to whether the OSCE was in crisis, he said it was certainly in
transition. Some participating States had complained of double
standards and called for a review of how it monitored elections.
There was no agreement on extending the mandate of the Border
Monitoring Operation in Georgia, and there had been no consensus
among OSCE Foreign Ministers at the conclusion of the last two
Ministerial Council meetings. In answer to calls for reform, a Panel
of Eminent Persons had been appointed to make recommendations on
strengthening the organization’s effectiveness. That would be
followed by high-level consultations and then a Ministerial Council
in Ljubljana. The OSCE was also looking at how to strengthen its
field operations. That process was more of an opportunity than a
crisis.

The challenge to the organization’s relevance and strategic direction
had shaken some States out of their complacency and brought into the
open some issues that had been festering below the surface for some
time, he said. One of the OSCE’s strengths was its ability to adapt
to the challenges of the day. Changes in the European Union, the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Council of Europe
reflected a Europe in transition, partly as a result of European
Union and NATO expansion, but also because of coping with new threats
to security. Organizations must remain dynamic to remain relevant,
and the OSCE was no exception.

Noting that the OSCE was a regional arrangement in the sense of
Chapter VIII of the United Nations Charter, he said that the report
of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change had been
read with interest and expressed the hope that bold decisions would
be taken to make greater use of Chapter VIII and enhance further the
cooperation between the United Nations and regional organizations.
The Security Council’s ability to more proactively prevent and
respond to threats could be strengthened by making fuller and more
productive use of regional organizations. The OSCE was
well-positioned and well-equipped to do so.

Pointing out that the OSCE had a well-earned reputation in early
warning, early action and conflict prevention, he said there were
areas, such as preventing ethnic conflict and regulating the marking
and tracing, as well as the brokering and transfer of small arms and
light weapons, where the organization was even more progressive than
United Nations standards. The OSCE also coordinated assistance on the
ratification and implementation of 12 United Nations anti-terrorism
conventions and protocols. It worked with the Economic Commission for
Europe (ECE) on addressing economic and environmental threats to
security.

In Kosovo, he said, the OSCE was an integral part of the structure of
the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK),
and in the present important year it could play a key role in the
standards-review process and remain part of the international
presence there. The OSCE had considerable expertise in national
minority issues, policing and building effective public institutions
that were so essential for the peaceful and sustainable development
of Kosovo. The case of Kosovo highlighted the issue of reconciling
the desire for self-determination with the preservation of the
territorial integrity of States. In parts of the Republic of Moldova
and Georgia, and in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, the
OSCE was actively trying to resolve conflicts that were sometimes
referred to as frozen, but which lately had started to thaw. In those
cases, the organization had clear mandates and was one of the lead
agencies on the ground.

The OSCE was encouraged by the slow but steady progress being made in
the dialogue between Armenia and Azerbaijan, he said. It was to be
hoped that recent changes in Ukraine and that a new post-election
environment in the Republic of Moldova would enable a new attempt to
resolve the Transdniestrian conflict. The OSCE was also working with
parties to reduce tensions in South Ossetia, Georgia, and to promote
demilitarization, build confidence and achieve a lasting settlement.
In all of those cases, the OSCE urged the Security Council to support
its efforts, particularly those Council members who were mediators in
the conflicts or had influence over the parties. It was difficult for
inter-State organizations to deal with non-State actors, even if —
as in some cases — they were de facto authorities. Sometimes the
leverage of powerful States, including permanent members of the
Council, could be crucial.

Another important issue in the Panel’s report was the clash between
the concept of `responsibility to protect’ and the principle of
non-intervention in the internal affairs of a State, he said. The
OSCE was very clear and progressive when it came to human rights.
Commitments undertaken in the human dimension of the OSCE were
matters of direct and legitimate concern to all participating States
and did not belong exclusively to the internal affairs of the State
concerned. That legitimate intrusiveness was the basis on which
participating States held each other accountable for the
implementation of their commonly agreed commitments. It was the
justification for having OSCE missions in participating States,
helping the host States to deal with specific challenges, and it was
the reason why the organization’s High Commissioner on National
Minorities or Representative on Freedom of the Media could,
respectively, go to any State throughout the OSCE region to prevent
inter-ethnic conflict and ensure respect for free media.

Regarding the need for a comprehensive, multilateral approach, he
noted the Panel’s highlighting of threats to global security from
which no State or region was immune. In an interconnected world,
security was indivisible. Multifaceted challenges required a
multilateral response that took a comprehensive view of security. The
OSCE was doing its part and had a proven track record in
post-conflict rehabilitation or peace-building. Its 18 field missions
represented an invaluable on-the-ground presence that offered
concrete assistance to participating States, and it had quickly
developed capabilities to deal with new threats to security,
including in anti-trafficking, counter-terrorism, border management
and policing.

When addressing the new threats to security, the bottom line for the
OSCE was upholding the rule of law, he stressed. For example, the
organization had to ensure that efforts to combat terrorism were not
undertaken in a way that violated human rights, that border guards
learned sophisticated techniques and a proper code of conduct or that
human trafficking was tackled by effective investigation, law
enforcement and prosecution. Policing was a classic example. In many
tense situations, effective policing, rather than blue helmets, was
needed. The OSCE ran police development units in the western Balkans
and had launched a police development programme in Kyrgyzstan. Others
were being prepared in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. No other
international organization currently possessed the potential to
strengthen long-term law enforcement capacity- and
institution-building in the OSCE region in the States most
susceptible to crime, corruption and human rights violations.

States should not underestimate or take for granted the quiet but
useful work done by organizations like the OSCE to make the world
safer, he emphasized. The organization should also be more open to
sharing its experience and expertise with others. In 2004, the OSCE
had sent an election support team to Afghanistan and, earlier this
year, it had sent a needs-assessment team to the Palestinian
territories to see what help it could offer on elections. In
addition, Mongolia was now an OSCE Partner for Cooperation. The
organization had an impact beyond its vast region and could develop
such relations even further.

MIHNEA IOAN MOTOC (Romania) welcomed an insightful and direct
briefing given to the Council and noted Mr. Rupel’s energetic and
straightforward approach to the activities of the organization he
chaired. In particular, he appreciated the attention paid to the
Kosovo issue.

Turning to the effectiveness of the multilateral handling of frozen
conflicts, he said that protracted conflicts were a great challenge.
Looking at the issue from a `half-full glass approach’, one could say
that it was important that fighting had stopped. However, the
international community was still facing constantly growing threats
in that regard, for such conflicts became the areas of smuggling,
arms proliferation and terrorism. The Security Council and regional
organizations like the OSCE should do more to advance the settlement
of such situations. He asked Mr. Rupel to elaborate on the objectives
of the OSCE Chairmanship in that regard and to assess the possibility
of cooperation with the United Nations in that area. He also asked
about the Transdniestrian conflict in the Republic of Moldova.

REED JACKSON FENDRICK (United States) thanked Mr. Rupel for clearly
outlining the capabilities of the OSCE, particularly in the area of
international peace and security. He wanted to know how the two
organizations could, in practical terms, improve their cooperation in
response to threats. He also asked questions about the OSCE election
teams sent to Afghanistan and the Palestinian Authority and OSCE
activities outside of its immediate area of responsibility.

ALEXANDER V. KONUZIN (Russian Federation) said that his country
supported the basic priorities proposed by the current Chairmanship
of the OSCE, which were directed at the reform and revitalization of
that organization, as well as the restoration of balance among its
security, economic and humanitarian activities. He took particular
note of the need to further develop the OSCE activities in the
security sphere. Indeed, for the OSCE to be able to fully implement
its original objective of being a forum for a wide dialogue on the
most important issues, it was necessary to overcome artificially
formed functional and territorial imbalances in its activities. His
delegation supported a comprehensive development and improvement of
cooperation of the United Nations and its Security Council with
regional and subregional arrangements on the basis of the United
Nations Charter, in particular its Chapter VIII, duly taking into
account their existing comparative advantages.

He welcomed a close and fruitful interaction between the OSCE as a
regional organization, and the United Nations in a number of key
areas, first and foremost linked to security and resolution of
regional conflicts. Among the examples in that connection, he
mentioned Abkhazia (Georgia) and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The OSCE’s
contribution to the implementation of Security Council resolution
1244 (1999) on Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) deserved particular
note. As part of United Nations Interim Administration Mission in
Kosovo (UNMIK), the OSCE played an important role there.

In that context, he asked what additional steps must be taken to
ensure equal implementation of the human rights of all inhabitants of
Kosovo, particularly those belonging to non-Albanian minorities. He
also wanted to know what the OSCE was planning to undertake in the
light of the negative experience of March 2004, in order to prevent
future extremist manifestations in the mass media and organizations
of civil society.

PAUL JOHNSTON (United Kingdom) said his country was a strong
supporter of the organization and wished to see an active and
effective OSCE covering the whole range of its mandate. The
organization had made a very important contribution to the building
of democracy in Kosovo and across the region.

He asked how the Chairman-in-Office saw the OSCE’s ability to take on
new areas of activity while remaining as effective in those areas
where it had specialized up to the present time. Given the expansion
of the European Union, how could the OSCE achieve a complementary and
effective relationship with the European Union?

Response by OSCE

Responding to comments and questions, Mr. RUPEL said that, in
general, the OSCE was strongest at conflict prevention, but also had
a role in conflict settlement. Obvious destinations of its activities
included South Ossetia, Transdniestria and Nagorno-Karabakh. As for
the cooperation between the United Nations and the OSCE, it was less
a case of what the United Nations could do for the OSCE, and more of
what the OSCE could do for the United Nations. That had been his
motive for coming to the United Nations today.

Effective settlement of conflicts should be attempted first at the
regional level, without `burdening’ the United Nations, he said. The
OSCE could do more to increase information sharing on early warning,
followed by early action. Regarding further steps to achieve synergy
between the OSCE and the United Nations, he said that his
organization attached great importance to such links. As a regional
organization, the OSCE contributed substantially to the maintenance
of peace and security in its area of responsibility, implementing
United Nations documents and principles. The connection between the
two organizations was close and continued to strengthen in many
areas, including the fight against terrorism. He hoped it would be
reflected in the General Assembly resolution on the cooperation
between the United Nations and the OSCE, which could not be agreed
upon at the fifty-ninth session. He was happy with the initiatives to
deepen such cooperation and noted the recommendation of the Panel on
Threats, Challenges and Change to deepen contacts with regional
organizations.

Turning to the Transdniestrian conflict, he said that it had to be
addressed in the near future, for it was a dangerous source of
instability for the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine. He hoped that
recent changes in Ukraine and a new post-election environment in the
Republic of Moldova would have a positive effect on the situation. It
was important to convince Tiraspol that the current situation was not
sustainable. Decentralization and strong self-government would offer
a chance for Transdniestria to solve many of its problems.

He agreed with the representative of the Russian Federation regarding
the issue of balancing the activities of the OSCE. The Slovenian
Chairmanship believed that the organization needed reform,
revitalization and rebalancing between the three components of its
activities: economy and ecology, the human dimension and the military
aspects. In that regard, he had already proposed some steps,
including holding conferences and workshops. Among the possibilities,
were regional conferences on energy security and military doctrines.

`We should pause and try to see what is in the interest of the
majority’, he said. He hoped the OSCE could resolve its differences
on contributions, for it should not be conceived as an organization
that was mainly preoccupied with its own internal problems.

He also agreed with what had been said on the protection of human
rights in Kosovo. He had visited the area several times, including
after the events in March 2004 and several weeks ago. He was
impressed by the progress he had seen regarding the attitudes of the
provisional leadership of Kosovo. His interlocutors there realized
that there was no good solution without taking everybody on board,
including Serbian and other minorities, as well as international
community partners. It was important to prevent the events of March
2004 from being repeated or even attempted. The United Nations was
doing good work in that regard.

He had his worries, as everybody else, regarding possible
consequences of the indictment of the prime minister of the
Provisional Government in Kosovo, he continued. He hoped that would
not result in mass protests. It was not in the interest of the people
of Kosovo to go in that direction. He hoped a tense situation would
not be used for provocation. The situation in Kosovo should not be
dramatized. The status quo did not suit anybody in Kosovo, but there
were some radical elements in the region and criminal structures in
Kosovo itself that would like to keep it. It was necessary to
deliberate on the issue carefully. The role of the United Nations was
key, and a new resolution by the Council would be needed. There were
plenty of good ideas and concepts around.

Responding to a question by the United Kingdom representative, he
said that it was necessary to develop synergies not only between the
OSCE and the United Nations, but also between the OSCE and the
European Union. As far as conflict prevention was concerned, there
were many similar concepts. For instance, in the area of conflict
prevention, the two organizations could address the situation in
Georgia, where a border-monitoring project had been stopped for the
lack of a new mandate. The issue of border guards’ training was being
discussed in Vienna, and the European Union could help with some
ideas of its own. If the Union could step in that situation, that
would be of great importance to Georgia, and there would be no
jealousy as far as the OSCE was concerned.
From: Baghdasarian

Bulgarian Clergy Blesses NATO Headquarters

Sofia News Agency, Bulgaria
March 4 2005

Bulgarian Clergy Blesses NATO Headquarters

Politics: 4 March 2005, Friday.

Bulgarian delegation consisting of clergymen from various confessions
of Bulgaria landed on a special visit at the Brussels headquarters of
NATO on Friday.

Metropolitan bishops of Varna and Veliko Tarnovo – Kiril and
Grigorii, the director of Supreme Muslim Institute Mustafa Hadji,
Apostolic Bishop Hristo Proykov, the head of Armenian Apostolic
Church in Bulgaria Rupen Krikoryan, the chairman of Central Israeli
Spiritual Council Robert Djerassi, the chief of Union of Evangelistic
Churches Pastor Viktor Varchev, and Pastor Vassil Vassilev, who is
chairing the United Evangelic Alliance.

The visit has marked a unique event of consecrating the NATO offices
of Bulgaria in Brussels, as that is the first ever visit of Bulgarian
clergymen at the headquarters of the Alliance, nearly a year after
Bulgaria became its full-fledged member.

The delegates met with NATO officers, including with Jamie Shea, NATO
Deputy Assistant Secretary General for External Relations, who
stressed on the important public role of clergy for the formation of
public opinion.

Armenian wrestlers snatch two silver medals at Tehran Tournament

ArmenPress
March 4 2005

ARMENIAN WRESTLERS SNATCH TWO SILVER MEDALS AT TEHRAN TOURNAMENT

TEHRAN, MARCH 4, ARMENPRESS: Armenian free-style wrestler Roman
Amoyan (55 kg weight category) snatched silver medal at an
international tournament in Iran losing in the finals to an Iranian
rival.
He has won the second silver medal for the Armenian team. The
first was won by Vahram Hunanian (60 kg) from Gyumri.

Zimbabwe to Free More Than 60 South African Mercenaries

Voice of America
March 4 2005

Zimbabwe to Free More Than 60 South African Mercenaries

By Peta Thornycroft
Harare
04 March 2005

A lawyer for more than 60 suspected South African mercenaries jailed
in Zimbabwe for their involvement in a coup plot in oil-rich
Equatorial Guinea says they may return to South Africa on Saturday.

The year long saga of a suspected coup plot in Equatorial Guinea is
drawing to a close as a group of South Africans’ prison sentences are
reduced by four months following an appeal to the country’s second
highest court.

Back home in South Africa, they face charges under the country’s
anti-mercenary legislation. But lawyers say they are likely to
negotiate a plea bargain and be instantly released.

According to South Africa and Equatorial Guinea, the men had planned
to fly to Malabo, overthrow the government and install an exiled
opposition leader.

Among the alleged plotters was British businessman Mark Thatcher, son
of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. He was accused of
partially financing the alleged plot and was recently fined $500,000
by a South African court for violating its anti-mercenary laws.

The group’s alleged ringleader, former British army officer Simon
Mann still has four years of his sentence to serve in Zimbabwe’s
maximum security prison on the outskirts of Harare.

His lawyer Jonathan Samkange has hinted he might get a presidential
pardon around the time local elections are held at the end of the
month. South African and Equatorial Guinean prosecutors want to try
him for the alleged coup attempt.

In Equatorial Guinea, a more than a dozen South Africans and
Armenians are serving long prison sentences for their role in the
alleged plot.

The men detained in Harare had flown in from South Africa to collect
weapons bought from the Zimbabwe government’s defense industries.

South African intelligence operatives had tipped off Zimbabwean
security forces who arrested the men. They claimed they were on their
way to guard a mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The men were tried and pled guilty to relatively minor immigration
and firearms charges. The state had no evidence to connect them to
the alleged plot in Equatorial Guinea. Zimbabwe has no legislation to
prevent mercenary activities.

Attorney Alwyn Griebenow, who represents the men in Harare waiting to
be released, says they could be home on Saturday.

He says he is not sure why they have not already been released
because all the documentation is complete. He also said he is not
sure if they are sent to the airport Saturday whether there will be
any seats available on a flight to Johannesburg.

ArmeniaNow.com – March 4, 2005

ARMENIANOW.COM
Administration Address: 26 Parpetsi St., No 9
Phone: +(374 1) 532422
Email: [email protected]
Internet:
Technical Assistance: (For technical assistance please contact to Babken Juharyan)
Email: [email protected]
ICQ#: 97152052

FOR THE RECORD: GENOCIDE DOCUMENTATION TO BE PUBLISHED BY NATIONAL ARCHIVE

By Gayane Lazarian
ArmeniaNow Reporter

The National Archive of Armenia will for the first time publish a book
entitled `Eyewitness Evidence about the Genocide’ this month. The book
will present 600 documents.

`These documents have never been paid attention to. Genocide was
presented by official, diplomatic documents’ says National Archive
Director Amatuni Virabyan. `An individual, a person has not been
featured. We always said that 1.5 million people had been
exterminated, and it was said abstractly, in an unaddressed manner,
there were no concrete people. Now if we say that 25 people were
killed, we will mention each of them name by name.’

The facts on the basis of which the book will be published were put
down from the words of emigrants in 1916 by journalists of the `Mshak’
newspaper published in Tiflis. They toured all Eastern Armenia, and
even met survivors in Russia and documented their stories.

Virabyan says that the stories of all eyewitnesses have one common
scheme. The teller depicts the general situation of the village, how
many Armenian residents it had, how many churches there were, and
finally how the massacres began.

For example, case No. 439 presents the massacres of Sasun’s Aghbi
village in the province of Bitlis. The 9-page story was accounted by
journalists on November 5, 1916 in Tiflis, from the words of
40-year-old eyewitness Nure Yeritsyan.

`There were 150 houses in the village. I had three sons, Sogho, Misak
and Azat, with me and one son, Sedrak, was in Russia, one daughter,
Azniv, two daughters-in-law. We were rich. We had 700 honeycombs bees,
150 rams, 40 heads of cattle, 50 land-plots, a watermill and other
riches. I was the only survivor from our house. I reached Tiflis and
now live with my son Sedrak.’

Thereafter, Nure tells of how they fled the village, how they hid in
the Andok, Tsovasar, Kanasar mountains. During the escape she lost her
daughters-in-law, sons, grandchildren.

`November 1915. We slept inside rocks, in dry grass, there was nothing
to eat. We even ate dogs and cats. Finally, we even started to eat
human flesh. When we were thirsty we used to drink each other’s
urine. In December-January there was no longer human flesh left, we
began to eat the remaining hide of cattle, leather shoes, and then
animal and human bones. We warmed them on fire and ate grinding them
with our teeth,’ Nure tells.

Virabyan says it is natural that Turks should deny it, saying that
there was no organized massacre. According to them, there were
deportations and it was quite possible that people died on their way.

`Our goal is to show with 600 horrible human stories that similar
brutalities were repeated everywhere, in all provinces, villages,’
says the archive director.

There are 12,000 documents kept in the National Archive today. Besides
the book to be published soon, another one will appear in autumn. The
facts for this book were collected by the well-known writer Hovhannes
Tumanyan in 1918. `A public committee was set up upon the writer’s
initiative to decide the losses incurred by the Armenian people. They
drafted a special questionnaire and visiting different places asked
people to fill in them. The eyewitnesses filled in their names, age,
village of residence, and, most importantly, how many members of their
families were massacred and how many survived,’ Virabyan explains.

In the data collected by Tumanyan people often mentioned themselves as
the only survivors from their families. Virabyan says: `A man
mentions 26 family members name by name and then says that he was the
only survivor. The stories are horrible. On the Andok hill surrounded
by Turks and Kurds starvation led the Sasun folks to eat the flesh of
those who had died. They tell of how Turks cut a child into pieces,
boiled and forced the parents to eat it. At first the editorial board
decided to publish the names of those people, but later we abandoned
that thought.’ Director of Turkish Studies at the NAS Institute of
Oriental Studies, Associate Professor Ruben Safrastyan says that such
publications are important and should have been accomplished
earlier. They are also indispensable original sources for scientific
researches.

And the archive director says that the recent statement made by Turkey
that archives in Armenia are closed is baseless.

`I deny it, no Turkish historian or journalist has yet turned to me, I
am ready to receive any Turkish historian and open the archives, all
the facts pertaining to the Genocide. I made this statement long ago
and there are responses,’ he says.

A number of foreign journalists have turned to Virabyan, she says,
including one New York producer who is making a film about the Ottoman
Empire.

The director also says that they have close ties with the Turkish
National Archive and that they in turn invite them for studies of the
Turkish archives.

And Safrastyan notes that it was in 1989 that Turkey for the first
time declared its archives open. `The US-based Zoryan Institute set
up a group of Armenian specialists from the Diaspora and Armenia, of
which I was a member, and asked the Turkish government to give
permission according to their statement. The reply was a denial.’
According to Safrastyan, only one specialist of Armenian nationality
from the United States worked in the Ottoman archives – Ara Sarafian,
and that wasn’t in regards with the genocide issues, but he studied
demographical issues. `Hilmar Kaiser, a German, worked in those
archives. His studies specifically focus on genocide issues. But as
the Turks knew what sort of work he was going to do, they began to
raise obstacles. Two years ago Kaiser published an open letter among
fellow scientists in which he mentioned the attitude showed towards
him by the Turks. He was unfairly accused of breaking laws and making
unauthorized copies.’

The 1915 documents are in Ottoman Turkish, which greatly differs from
modern Turkish. It is written in Arabic letters and is read from right
to left.

Safrastyan explains that knowing only Ottoman Turkish is not enough
for working in Ottoman archives. One should first be familiar with
handwritings and their different varieties. Each Ottoman state
department of that time had its own system of record-keeping.

`The researcher must know not only the Ottoman Turkish, but the whole
system of Ottoman statehood,’ he says.

OUT OF THE LOOP: AZERBAIJAN SAYS GEORGIA MUST STOP ASSISTING TRANSPORT
TO ARMENIA

By Aris Ghazinyan
ArmeniaNow Reporter

A special agreement between the State Customs Committee of Azerbaijan
and the Customs Department of the Ministry of Finance of Georgia
banning the shipment of cargoes designated for Armenia via Georgian
territory is expected to be signed soon on the Azeri-Georgian border.

This document was to have been signed in January, but was postponed.

Azerbaijan, which has been blockading Armenian communications since
1989, maintains active railway communication with Georgia via the
Baku-Tbilisi rail. This communication is vital to both states:
Azerbaijan thus ensures its gateway to the Black Sea ports of Georgia,
and Georgia, in view of its blockade of Abkhazia, gets the only
possibility of railway communication with the outside world via
Azerbaijan’s territory.

At the same time, official Baku repeatedly expressed doubts over the
`non-purposeful’ use of this mainline. In its opinion, among the
cargoes shipped from Azerbaijan through the Georgian border are also
containers designated for Armenia which are shipped from Tbilisi to
Yerevan through the functioning Tbilisi-Yerevan railway. Thus, as the
Azeri authorities claim, the blockade of Armenia is disrupted at the
expense of its mediated involvement in regional commodity
turnover. The agreement is intended to prevent a further exploitation
of the situation.

On February 22, during inspections conducted by the State Customs
Committee and the Ministry of Transport of Azerbaijan, about 200
carloads of oil products were found on the Azeri-Georgian border, at
the Beyuk-Kesik station. These cargoes were to be shipped to Armenia
via Georgia. As the `Sharg’ agency reports, this cargo was shipped via
the Caspian railway of Azerbaijan to Georgia. A total of 420 carloads,
of which 297 were with grain, 75 with diesel fuel, 7 with tires, 2
with engine oil, 32 with liquefied gas, etc. were stopped on the
border. As a result, a sharp deficit of liquefied gas was felt in
Armenia, which led to a sharp increase in prices for it.

During a November Russian blockade of transport following the Beslan
terrorism by Chechens, an inspection of cargo bound for Georgia via
Azeri rail found undocumented goods believed to be bound for Armenia.

`What would be Georgia’s reaction if Azerbaijan began supplying diesel
fuel or other products to Abkhazia or South Ossetia?’ said
Azerbaijan’s Ambassador to Tbilisi Ramiz Hasanov in this regard. `I
think that this would be an infringement of Georgia’s national
interests.’

On November 30, a working group of Azerbaijan’s State Customs arrived
in Tbilisi. The group got down to the documentation of cargoes.

Commenting on the situation, the first Vice-Premier of Azerbaijan’s
government Abbas Abbasov said that Azerbaijan would not allow cargoes
to Georgia if they were designated for Armenia.

`Baku has signed a number of international acts-agreements on transit,
transportation and export, as well as on the Free Trade Zone, with the
only condition – non-admission of the use of Azerbaijan’s territory
for the transit of cargoes to Armenia,’ the vice-premier
emphasized. `A similar agreement has been signed also between Baku and
Tbilisi, and therefore Georgia must abide by its commitments. We
demanded that the Georgian authorities should strictly prohibit the
transit of Armenian cargoes. But if this process continues, Azerbaijan
will stop all cargoes heading for Georgia without exception.’

Official Yerevan has not yet responded to the possible signing of the
Azeri-Georgian agreement, whose `anti- Armenian’ essence is not even
concealed. The Armenian side continues to focus attention on the
`Abkhazian section’ of the railway, whose operation ensures Yerevan’s
exit to Russia bypassing Azerbaijan.

`The restoration of the cargo and passenger traffic on the Abkhazian
section is also in the interest of Georgia itself,’ Armenia’s Minister
of Transport and Communication Andranik Manukyan told REGNUM news
agency on February 25. `After all, today Tbilisi has to use transit
via Azerbaijan’s territory.’ `The blockade of the Abkhazian section
in fact does not deprive Abkhazia of communications with the outside
world, as the Sukhumi-Sochi railway branch is operated,’ Armenia’s
President Robert Kocharyan emphasizes in this regard. The context of
this statement by the Armenian leader is evident: to make it clear for
the Georgian authorities that it is Armenia and not Abkhazia that
suffers from the Abkhazian blockade.

BIG PLANS: RUSSIAN-ARMENIAN BUSINESSMAN HAS EXPENSIVE IDEAS FOR
ARMENIA INVESTMENT

By Julia Hakobyan
ArmeniaNow Reporter

A well-known Armenian-Russian businessman announced this week his
plans for a multi-million dollar investment into development of
tourism infrastructure in Armenia’s resort town of Tsakhkadzor. Ara
Abrahamyan, president of the Moscow based Union of Armenians of Russia
said that if his plan is approved by Armenian President Robert
Kocharyan he envisages to invest $100 million in the first phase of
hotel construction in Tsakhkadzor. Abrahamyan demonstrated to
journalists a sketch of the hotels network in the area, which will
take over 100,000 square meters. He said that Tsakhkadzor, a popular
skiing area in Armenia can become an attractive tourism destination
and mentioned that for example in Austria 35 percent of its budget
comes from tourism.

`We have already come to the agreement with the Russian Minister of
Sport that 500 Russian sportsmen will take rest and training in
Tsakhkadzor year round,’said Abrahamyan, adding that the hotels will
be 3 and 5 stars. Abrahamyan, 48, who is also a founder of the World
Armenian Congress told journalists that last year his organizations
distributed more than 5,000 computers in the schools of Armenia and
Karabakh.

However the businessman blamed Armenian authorities for their
insufficient efforts toward strengthening Armenia- Diaspora ties. He
mentioned that both his organizations do a lot in uniting Armenians
throughout the world and promoting Armenian issues, but without
support from the Armenian government the efforts of his both
organizations are not effective enough.

He mentioned that he donated $200,000 last weekend to the Armenian
Revolutionary Federation for promoting genocide recognition. In all
$1.7 million was raised at the February 26 banquet in Paris to
contribute to the activity of Hai Dat (for genocide recognition).

Abrahamyan who is known for his close ties with the Kremlin mentioned
that Russian President Vladimir Putin is to visit Armenia later this
month.

`This year we plan to erect a monument dedicated to Armenian genocide
in Moscow’s Victory Park,’ he said. `Until now there is not one
monument in Moscow in memory of genocide victims, except a khachkar in
the yard of an Armenian church. Also, a discussion on genocide has
been suggested in the Russian State Duma.’

Referring to the process of passing of a number of Armenian
enterprises to Russia to reduce the Armenian debt, he said that the
deal was profitable both for Armenia and Russia. However he said that
sufficient work was not done for their exploitation and creating of
jobs.

(In exchange of debt of $93 million Armenia has passed five
enterprises to Russia, such as Hrazdan Heat Power Plant, `Mars’ plant
and others.)

Abrahamyan complained that he is unable to complete construction of
buildings in a plot of land he acquired in the North Avenue complex –
the area of elite businesses and residences under construction now in
the center of Yerevan. `I have desire, I have money but it is not
possible to work. It is a paradox.’ Abrahamyan however refused to
explain the reasons and did not specify whom he accuses in stagnating
construction. He only said that he knows that people who lived in that
area are unsatisfied with the compensation they got to leave their
houses which were demolished for the avenue construction.

`I was accused that I bought land and did not pay money to people, but
I had nothing to do with compensation. I deal with municipality and
agree that they did not pay enough money to the people,’ he said.

AIR APPARENT: LEGAL MEASURES AIM TO MAKE ARMENIA SMOKE FREE

By Julia Hakobyan
ArmeniaNow Reporter

Armenia took a step toward combating smoking this week as the `Law on
Restriction of Tobacco Realization, Consumption and Usage’ came into
effect March 2.

The law which is to be implemented in three phases envisages that by
next year smoking in public places, such as hospitals, cultural and
education institutions, public transports, sport halls and complexes
will be forbidden. The sale of cigarettes to minors (below age 18) is
forbidden since the beginning of this month. Before the end of this
year both public organizations and state institutions should allocate
a room for smokers, while the rest of its offices should be
smoke-free. This restriction applies also to restaurants and cafés,
where non-smoking areas should be designated.

The law was passed by the National Assembly last month after being
twice rejected by the lawmakers, some of whom are the republic’s
biggest importers of tobacco.

Last November Armenia also joined a Framework Convention on Tobacco
Control (FCTC), an international treaty negotiated by 192 member
states of the World Health Organization. (WHO) The FCTC requires
following the WHO standards of health warning, covering 30 percent of
a cigarette pack with information about the dangers of
smoking. According to the FCTC, the Armenian government should outlaw
cigarette advertising by 2010.

Armenia so far is the only member of the FCTC among Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS).

However statistics say that Armenia tops the list of European counties
in consumption of cigarettes. An estimated 70 percent of men are
smokers.

At present, the sale and advertisement of cigarettes dominates the
consumer market. Few places have designated smoking areas. Even the
Ministry of Health which is actively campaigning against smoking does
not have a special smoking area in its building.

According to the state custom service, 442 million cigarettes were
imported to Armenia over the first quarter of 2004, showing a 22.8 per
cent growth over last year. Cigarette production accounts for 3.3 per
cent of Armenia’s industrial output. In 2003 3.22 million cigarettes
were made by local producers, 14.4 percent more than a year before.

WHO statistics say that about 2,000 people die in Armenia annually
from smoking related diseases. Organizations in Armenia who campaign
against smoking hope that with the new law the number of smokers in
Armenia will stop increasing.

Yelena Manvelyan, the head of `Armenian Women for Health and Healthy
Environment’ ngo greeted especially the fact that smoking will be
prohibited in public transport.

`The drivers who smoke put in danger the health of passengers, who
become passive smokers,’ she said. `Of course enforcing the law in
Armenia where most of men smoke is not easy and it will take a long
time. However without taking first steps we can not go ahead.’

The Armenian Public Health Alliance and the Coalition for Tobacco Free
Armenia issued a statement yesterday which reads `Without an
exaggeration, this law can save lives, as it encompasses measures
aimed at preventing tobacco uptake by children, assisting smokers in
quitting, and protecting the right of non-smokers for a smoke free
environment.’

The WHO statistics say that tobacco is the second major cause of death
in the world. It kills one in ten adults’ worldwide (about 5 million
deaths each year). If current smoking patterns continue, it will cause
some 10 million deaths each year by 2020.

GROWING AWARENESS: AGENCIES COOPERATE FOR THE SAKE OF A GREENER ARMENIA

By Suren Musayelyan
ArmenianNow Reporter

An American government agency and Armenian environmentalists are
joining hands to save Armenia’s forests through education.

The main purpose of the two-day workshop, `Environmental Education’,
organized by the U.S. Peace Corps and the Armenia Tree Project (ATP)
in Yerevan was to promote cooperation between specialists from
Armenian NGOs and Peace Corps volunteers involved in environmental
projects and provide both with useful information about education in
this sphere.

The workshop organizers hope that, updated on environmental education
matters, the participants will spread on the knowledge in their
day-to-day work with members of the public, including in the country’s
regions. During the workshop local and international environmental
educators shared their theoretical and practical knowledge and
experience with the participants through original presentations. The
workshop also discussed such topics as fishery, forestry, food chain,
grafting, etc.

According to ATP Country Director Susan Yagubian Klein, Armenia may
face complete deforestation in 20 years unless it takes urgent action
to stop the shrinkage of forests today. Meanwhile, she said, education
and environmental awareness are an important component in the struggle
to preserve wildlife. `The only way that logging is going to be
stopped is for the public to become aware of the situation and the
best way to reach the public is through educating young people,’ said
Klein. `So, this is one way to make the public more aware of the
dangers to the environment.’

Klein cited the data of the `Millennium Challenges’ Program Report
according to which forests occupy only 8-10% of Armenia’s territory
today. Meanwhile, according to the same source, forests made 12% of
the country’s territory in 1990 and 25% at the beginning of last
century.

Since its establishment in 1994, the Armenia Tree Project has planted
and tended more than 580,000 trees in about 500 areas of Armenia. It
has two arboretums in two villages of the Ashtarak and Masis regions
where it grows about 40,000 saplings every year.

The US Peace Corps has been in Armenia since 1992. This year is the
seventh year of its cooperation with the ATP. Among the 85 Peace
Corps volunteers in Armenia there are also ten who are involved in
environmental projects. According to Peace Corps Environmental
Education Project Head Armen Tiraturyan, the organization’s volunteers
mainly work with young Armenians in all marzes (regions) of the
country except Armavir and Ararat. `We hope that after the workshop
they will be able to apply their knowledge in their practical work
with the public,’ he said.

Peace Corps Armenia Country Director Patrick Hart also stressed the
importance of their cooperation with the ATP. `Our volunteers teaching
in Armenia’s regions and trying to raise environmental awareness among
young Armenians will only benefit from their cooperation with the ATP
whose work is crucial to improving the environment,’ he said. Peace
Corps Armenia Program and Training Officer Deborah Wild said that one
of the reasons for the successful cooperation between the ATP and the
Peace Corps is that the two organizations share the same values. `We
share concern for Armenia’s long-term development and the future of
Armenia and its children,’ she said. `That is why we share our great
interest and enjoy collaborating in the area of education.’

ATP Community Tree Planting Project Coordinator Anahit Gharibyan also
commented on the significance of the workshop. She said that the
event had brought together people who are genuinely concerned over the
country’s environmental problems. `The level of environmental
awareness among children and young people is very low in the country,’
she said. `I think that young people and children must be educated on
environmental issues from early age.’ According to the workshop
organizers, `Environmental Education’ is going to become an annual
workshop in Armenia.

HANDS ACROSS HAYASTAN: ARMENIANS HOPE TO DANCE INTO THE RECORD BOOK

By Marianna Grigoryan
ArmeniaNow Reporter

This year Armenians will have a chance to celebrate the First Republic
Day, May 28, in an original way. A move is underfoot, literally, to
have more than 160,000 Armenians join in a `Round Dance of Unity’.

`All our nation will unite around the round dance of unity,’ says Aram
Karapetyan, the head of the Nig Aparan Compatriots Union and the
headquarters of the `Round Dance of Unity’ initiative.

Karapetyan says the idea of the initiative has been circulating for so
long nobody can tell where the idea comes from.

`All of us hand in hand will dance the round dance of unity at two
o’clock that day,’ says Karapetyan. `The people are so excited we
couldn’t have expected, and we feel excited of it even more. People
come to register with families and organizations bring long lists of
participation.’

Karapetyan says the round dance will start at the new bridge in
Ashtarak and make a circle that will include the cities of Ashtarak,
Talin, Artik, Aragats, Alagyaz of two marzes, and the dance will close
on the Ashtarak Bridge again.

According to a special plan, participants will arrive at the main
roads where they will join hands. Diaspora are expected among the
guests.

Karapetyan says delegations from Kazakhstan and Belarus will arrive in
Armenia to take part in the event. The Karabagh delegation headed by
the Prime Minister will also arrive. Ten applicants from Turkey have
wished to participate, two of them ethnic Turks.

`This is a dance when scientists and craftsmen, artists and doctors,
peasants and citizens will be hand in hand,’ says
Karapetyan. `Well-known artists, officials, scientists, doctors will
be present, who will address the people in special videos broadcasted
by TV before the event.’

Karapetyan says all these will be shot from one or two helicopters as
the round dance hopes to get recognition in the Guinness Book of World
Records.

`There has not been such a thing in the world before when so many
people joined hands,’ the excited leader says (having apparently not
heard of the `Hands Across the World’ phenomena). `The representatives
of the Guinness book will also be present that day and we will be
registered in the book of records.’

The territory for the round dance takes nearly 160 kilometers. It has
been estimated that ideally some 160,000 participants are needed,
although the organizers believe the number of participants will be
more.

`The participants are different,’ says Karapetyan. `Owing to the works
that started a month ago more than 110,000 have applied for
participation – individuals and mainly organizations with all their
staffs.’

At the same time for more variety of the round dance, according to the
organizer, the organizations will participate in their professional
dresses, – the doctors in white smocks, and the individuals the way
they prefer.

Educational institutions will also participate in the
initiative. There will also be participants on horses and in royal
coats. Each registered participant will get a special certificate of
participation.

`At present we work on providing national music all around the 160
kilometers,’ says Karapetyan. `Besides the national music, we have
planned participation of 1,600 professional dancers, although 10,000
have applied for it; they will make the event more lively.’

Within the frameworks of the event, 36 khachkars with Armenian letters
will be placed; they will also plant 200,000 poplars.

According to Karapetyan, the poplar has been chosen because these
trees do not need special care and there is no problem of regular
irrigation.

Karapetyan says everything is planned beforehand to escape
misunderstanding. The police will support the event with its different
regiments.

`We hope everything will be wonderful, and we will surprise the world
with this original initiative and will be registered in the Guinness
Book of Records,’ says Karapetyan. `People will stand hand in hand for
nearly an hour so that the helicopters manage to shoot the video; then
the national celebrations will start, with singing and dancing and
feasting, for which special tables will be installed.’

FILM STAR: SINGLE FATHER PLAYS OUT HIS OWN ROLE OF `TRAMP’

By Vahan Ishkhanyan
ArmeniaNow Reporter

`My late mother would say: you love Raj Kapur so much that you will
end up being a tramp one day,’ Avo remembers his mother’s
prophesy. Raj Kapur was a Bollywood star whose movies were very
popular in Armenia in the 1970-80s. The `Tramp’, in which he starred
was always on the screens. Many know by heart the songs from this
movie. The mother was right. Whether it was the love of the film or
the economic hardship of his country, Avo became a tramp . . .

Avetik Khachatryan, 40, still sings songs from those Indian films. He
also named his children from movie references. Hrach, is 10 (he named
him in honor of Raj Kapur), and his daughters are Gita, 6, and Zita,
4, (from the `Zita and Gita’ movie). Even the birthmark on Gita’s back
is reminiscent of India’s map. He calls himself and his son tramps
(`brodyaga,’ in Russian) – brodyaga Hrach and brodyaga Avo.

He loved Indian movies so much that in the `80s Avo learned to speak
Hindi from Indian students and translated three movies into
Armenian. He remembers the words of his Indian friend, which he says
in Hindi and then translates: `Armindar was right when he said that
life is worse than death.’

Avo’s life has also turned into an Indian movie. He has become a kind
hero who is without a proper job, raising three children alone. He is
not the father of the youngest of the children, but he considers it
his duty to father her too: `Blood doesn’t count here,’ he says. His
wife left him, leaving the children behind. Sometimes she pays visits
and takes little Zita with her and then she brings her back again.

In the 1990s Avo’s brothers ran into debts, sold their father’s house
and then left for Russia. Avo rented an apartment where he lived with
his mother and worked at a construction site. He got married in
1994. A year later Hrach was born. His wife left but then came back
and Gita was born, and again she left with Gita.

Avo lost his job as a construction worker. He could no longer pay the
rent. The two tramps – Avo and three-year-old Hrach – found themselves
in the street, homeless and hungry.

`I knocked at somebody’s door, a woman opened. I asked her to let me
stay with her for one night because I had nowhere to sleep and to pity
my child. She asked if it was a new way of robbery. I told her I
wanted to stay for one night and suggested that she tie my feet with a
rope to make sure I wouldn’t run away. She believed me, led us to the
bedroom upstairs. And in the morning she gave us tea.’

For two days Avo fed his child from garbage cans. Then he learned
about bottle collecting.

Avo joined the large army of the poor going from home to home
collecting bottles and handing them to reception points for cash. `For
many years I was collecting bottles with Hrach in my arms or in the
pram. We have our own anthem – the song from `Tramp’: `Give way, they
are calling you.’

At first collecting was difficult. Many people drove him from their
doorsteps and cursed him and some even wanted to beat him for knocking
at their door. But now he has permanent residents who know him and
keep bottles especially for him.

Soon, he took a second `job’. He dumps garbage that people leave on
their doorsteps. Some pay 200 drams (about 50 cents) a month; others
pay 50-100 drams a day. All in all, he manages to earn 5,000 drams
(about $9) a month by dumping garbage.

Occasionally Avo picks up odd jobs. Recently he hauled 39 sacks of
sand up four flights of stairs. He was paid about $4.30.

For four years the `tramp’ has managed to rent a 12-square-meter room
in Yerevan’s Nork district where he lives with his three
children. There is no kitchen; the toilet is outside. It costs 8,000
drams a month. The landlord wanted to raise it to 10,000, but then he
felt sorry for Avo and left it unchanged. Every morning Avo goes
collecting and dumping, leaving his three children alone. Since Hrach
began to attend school he doesn’t go with him: `I said, Hrach jan, you
must attend lessons, you don’t have to come with me anymore. If they
ask you at school about your daddy’s occupation, tell them he is
engaged in commerce.’

Avo is glad to see February pass. People don’t drink so much in
winter, leaving fewer bottles. He was short by half on the February
rent. And the electric bill of about $15 is due.

`Well, summer will come soon, everything will be alright,’ Avo says.

Avo always wears clean clothes, a white shirt. He used to wash his
clothes by hand. Now he has an old Soviet-type washing machine which
residents gave him as a gift. It leaks water, but anyway it is better
than doing laundry by hand.

The single father manages enough for food, electricity and rent. The
family’s possessions, including cassettes with Indian songs and a
small TV-set that has lost colors are gifts from residents.

Varduhi Manukyan, who lives on Baghramyan Avenue, says that people
like Avo very much: `He is a guy who will always lend his helping
hand, he knows a lot, he is not a simple poor man,’ he says. `I give
him bottles and also clothes and equipment that I don’t want to throw
away. He has a son, Brodyaga. He used to come with him before.’ The
residents do not know about his two daughters.

`It is said in the Bible: I have dressed flowers in colorful clothes,
but you, human being, if you love me as much as a mustard seed,
honestly, won’t I be all the more sure to clothe you?’ says Avo,
without feeling that his life has given the Biblical passage a new
sense.

Four years ago Avo asked his landlord to go to the village after his
wife and ask her to come back. Before he went, the wife showed up with
a newborn baby in her arms.

`Avo came and said, `Uncle Vagho, you see, there is no woman in the
house, it is difficult, I want to bring the mother of my children
back.Will you go to Lernavan to speak for me? Perhaps she will listen
to you and come back’,’ says the landlord, Vaghinak.

A few days later he looked out the window and saw a woman holding an
infant. The wife came and stayed. Three or four months later she
weaned the baby and left. Avo kept that child too. She calls him
daddy, she hasn’t seen another daddy.

Now his wife shows up once or twice a month: `The mother of the
children is not 100 percent, she is a 30-percent mother,’ says
Vaghinak. `What will be their end now, I don’t know.’

And the Indian movie continues, with good and bad people, love and
betrayal, compassion and cruelty. . . And the `tramp’, who dumps
garbage and picks bottles, and waits for the happy ending.

WINTER WATER WORLD: JERMUK HOPES TO REVIVE YEAR-ROUND TOURISM REPUTATION

By Suren Musayelyan
ArmenianNow Reporter

While mild weather has been welcomed in the capital, about 170
kilometers south-east of Yerevan, the forested resort town of Jermuk
is still deep in winter.

Here on the plateau, 2070 meters high above sea level, the thick snow
layer of Jermuk glows under sun rays as if shedding light of diamond
grit. The only noise-maker of the local nature, still enjoying winter
sleep, is the waterfall, which from 60 meters height flow into Arpa
River running through the town.

Once famous for its curing complex and water treatment, today Jermuk
is trying to again attract winter guests by restoring heating systems
in health resorts.

In comparison with Tsaghkadzor known for providing active winter rest
in Armenia, the main advantage of Jermuk with its typical mountainous
climate is the curable mineral water.

The curing complex of seven resorts of the town includes inner and
outer usage of thermal waters, diet therapy, gymnastics, walk therapy
in the open air, climatic and physiotherapeutic procedures.

`In the past our curing complex was dealing with visitors arriving
from all the former Soviet republics the whole year round,’ says
Stepan Avagyan, the head of Jermuk Business and Tourism Association
`Fifteen years have passed, and today our main goal is to return that
very contingent to Jermuk.’

In the city, founded in 1935 on the basis of mineral waters, today the
visiting card is still the mineral water gallery, where one can enjoy
several natural springs free of charge. The lowest temperature of the
waters is 30C, with 65C the highest.

In 1951 the first factory of mineral waters was established in the
town. During Soviet times its production, that is mineral water
Jermuk, was exported into 50 countries. Today the leading companies
here, producing mineral waters, are `Jermuk Group’ and Jermuk Parent
Enterprise.

Here patients with diagnosis of the alimentary canal, liver,
gall-bladder diseases, diabetes and gynecological illnesses pass
courses of water treatment.

The flow of visitors to Jermuk, mainly from the regions of Armenia,
begins in May and last till September. During Soviet times, however,
all the year round the town with 2,000 resort beds received 20,000
visitors annually from Russia only.

The first step of fame rehabilitation of Jermuk among CIS countries
took place last week, when local businessmen invited ambassadors of
Russia, the Ukraine and Belarus in Armenia to acquaint themselves with
the opportunities of the resort winter rest in Jermuk.

The weekend getaway was supported by Urban Institute financed by
USAID. Last year the Urban Institute helped finance and organize
Jermuk’s new tourism association, as part of similar involvement in 12
towns throughout Armenia. According to the specialists Jermuk
business and tourism center is among the most successful ones, where
the powers and businessmen are already united.

`It is so pleasant that all the businessmen involved in Jermuk tourism
business take part in the development of the economic
association. That means that in all the projects related to Jermuk
they will be present with an associated team,’ says Ara Petrosyan, the
Deputy Minister of the Trade and Economy Development of Armenia.

Two years ago the previous state health-resort complex in Jermuk was
actively privatized by businessmen.

`Today problems put in front of us are changed. The private owners
understand that they should repair the resorts to return their
visitors. Today the customer pays and demands up-to-date service: he
is not satisfied with the former conditions,’ says Stepan Avagyan.

In Jermuk’s health-resorts depending on quality of service, one-day
rest ranges from $18-80. Businessmen assure that during the first five
years all the city’s medical and rest buildings will meet contemporary
requirements. `Today increase of `nostalgic’ tourism is registered in
CIS countries: that is the tourists visit the places they have been
during Soviet times. It is conditioned on the likeness of the
mentality and customs, as well as on the absence of language
obstacles,’ says Deputy Minister Petrosyan.

According to him Armenia has a great potential of tourism development,
the proof of this is the statistics in the mid of 80s, when the number
of visitors into Armenia surpassed 600,000.

LOOKING FOR REFUGE: APARTMENT DISPUTE HIGHLIGHTS FRUSTRATIONS OF REFUGEES

By Zhanna Alexanyan
ArmeniaNow Reporter

A refugee family faces eviction from an apartment they have occupied
for nearly 15 years and are caught in the confusing legal quagmire
that affects some 300,000 Armenians who escaped from Azerbaijan in the
late 1980s and early ’90s. In October of the last year a civil court
ruled that 72-year old Albert and Raya Lazaryan must leave the
two-room apartment they took in June, 1990.

At issue is whether the Lazaryans are rightful owners of the
apartment, according to a law that gave refugees the right to own
apartments they had inhabited for at least 10 years.

After escaping Baku and living for a year with relatives, the
Lazaryans learned of an apartment that had been vacated. (There were
many such cases of abandonment in the early 1990s in Yerevan.) They
say they got assurance from the proper authorities that the apartment
was indeed unoccupied, then moved in.

Over the past 14 years the Lazaryans have made attempts to buy the
apartment and say they were defrauded of $1,600 by police for that
purpose. In 2001, the Lazaryans got Armenian citizenship and at that
point stepped up efforts to buy the apartment. They were told,
however, that the apartment had already been privatized, by its
previous owner, the Meliksetyan family, since 1994. In 1996,
according to Lazaryan, the municipality had attempted to move another
family into the apartment, but were prevented by laws that protect
refugees. `If the Meliksetyans had privatized this apartment in 1994,
why did they want to give it to someone else?’ asks Lazaryan. In 2001
the Court of the First Instance satisfied the Lazaryans’ appeal `to
recognize the right for use of living space and property ascribed to
Hasmik, Karen, Armen Meliksetyans as lost’. The decision also mentions
the defendant `has presented false information’ on inhabiting
apartment since 1990. But another court overturned the ruling,
recognizing ownership by the Meliksetyans. The Lazaryans believe
officials were bribed into back-dating the ownership transaction.

Advocates for refugees say the Lazaryans are caught in a situation
confronted by many refugees who have tried to make their status in
Armenia permanent.

According to data collected by the Helsinki Committee of Armenia none
of the nearly 50 suits in various court instances on depriving
refugees of apartments or temporary asylums have been solved in favor
of the refugees during recent years.

`Absolutely all the court instances infringe the refugees’ rights
prescribed by the law. As a result refugees who have become citizens
of Armenia are being ousted from the place they live’, reads the
annual report of the Helsinki Committee for 2004.

On February 4 the Department for Ousting and Inhabiting Issues at the
Compulsory Implementation Department postponed the ousting of the
Lazaryans `because of the actual lack of free dormitory room or space’
(according to another decision of the government in similar cases the
Refugee Committee provides an identical apartment). Seemingly
overlooked in the dispute is Item B of the Republic of Armenia
Decision number 588 of November 18, 1992. According to that
legislation, it is prohibited to issue deeds of ownership to someone
other than the occupant for those apartments that have been inhabited
by refugees even illegally.

Like others among the approximately 65,000 refugees who have earned
citizenship, the Lazaryans are caught in a `catch 22′ in which
becoming citizens has actually been to their detriment. That is to
say, they are no longer eligible for benefits that apply to those
having refugee status.

Since 2000, Albert Lazaryan has been disabled by a heart
condition. But when he applied for poverty benefits allowing for his
condition, he was told that he would not get the allowance, because he
was already getting a free apartment.

`At last the court deprived me of both allowance and apartment,’ says
Lazaryan, who claims that he is being `deported’ for a second time,
`this time from my homeland’.

The Lazaryans daughter live with them, but she is unemployed. Their
only son was killed in a car accident two years after moving to
Armenia. Their monthly income is an old-age pension of about $35.

`I always buy yesterday’s bread to pay some 30 drams less than the
usual price,’ says Raya Lazaryan. `This cruel winter we passed without
having heated our home.’

Six days after moving to Armenia Albert Lazaryan started working in a
bus depot. Later, when it was liquidated, he worked as a driver in a
garbage collection service.

`I have done every kind of work to provide for my family. While
working on the bus depot I have served 20-25,000 people a day. What
else should I do for this country not to be ousted from my legal
apartment’ he says. In Baku, the Lazaryans owned a three-room
apartment that they still hold the deed to.

Lazaryan’s former colleague, Lendrush Sahakyan who knows him since
1985 when they worked on an international transportation system, says
his friend was respected and lived a comfortable life in Baku.

`The illness and the illegalities have made him poor. They can now do
anything to him – he has neither money nor other means,’ says
Sahakyan.

www.armenianow.com

Los Angeles City Mayor James Hahn visits Rose & Alex Pilibos

PRESS RELEASE
Rose and Alex Pilibos Armenian School
1615 North Alexandria Avenus
Los Angeles, CA 90027
Contact: Nazaret Apanian
Tel: 323-668-2661
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

LOS ANGELES CITY MAYOR JAMES HAHN VISITS ROSE AND ALEX PILIBOS SCHOOL

LOS ANGELES – Los Angeles City Mayor James Hahn visited Rose & Alex
Pilibos Armenian School on March 3, 2005. Accompanying Mayor Hahn were
members of his staff as well as campaign managers. Mayor Hahn is running
for reelection as Los Angeles Mayor in the upcoming March 8 citywide
primary elections. Upon arriving at Pilibos Armenian School, Mayor Hahn
was greeted by Dr. Viken Yacoubian, Principal of the school and members
of the Administration. City Commissioners, Community activists, church
board members, as well as ANCA Regional Board representatives were also
at hand at greeting the Mayor. Paying a surprise visit, after Mayor
Hahn’s arrival, was Councilman Eric Garcetti. It is noteworthy that
Councilman Garcetti represents the Little Armenia District at the Los
Angeles City Hall. Meeting with the Mayor and Councilman Garcetti, Dr.
Yacoubian briefly introduced the Pilibos School and the growing
community. Touching upon the growth of the school since 1969, Dr.
Yacoubian highlighted major developments, including the recent addition
of the library and gymnasium, as well as the surge in the student body
population. Dr. Yacoubian further mentioned that graduates of Pilibos
Armenian School leave the school with a strong sense of their Armenian
identity, simultaneously having constructively integrated their American
identity into their sense of self.

After the brief meeting, Dr. Yacoubian led the Mayor and all guests to
the gymnasium. Students and faculty members enthusiastically welcomed
the Mayor. Mayor Hahn went out of his way to greet students at the
gymnasium. After the welcoming, Dr. Yacoubian introduced Mayor Hahn to
the students. Mayor Hahn thanked the students for their warm welcome. He
said, “Thank you Eagles, for the warm welcome. I am honored to be at
this fine school of yours”. He also congratulated the Boys Varsity
basketball team for advancing to the playoffs. Prior to answering
questions from students, the Mayor emphasized the importance of positive
community involvement. He mentioned that activism opens the doors of
opportunity and keeps individuals away from trouble.

After the town hall meeting with students and squeezing time in their
tight schedules, Mayor Hahn and Councilman Garcetti visited the 1st
grade class. The Mayor spoke about the city and his visit. He took the
time to answer questions from young Pilibos students, as well as
answered their “reading and spelling” questions.

Mayor Hahn and Councilman Garcetti also participated in the Student
Council’s “Cheese Beoreg” sale. President Ara Thomassian and Junior
Alice Sislian presented the guests with hot and delicious cheese
beoregs, compliments of the Student Council. The Mayor and his staff
enjoyed this Armenian treat.

The Pilibos School Administration would like to extend its sincere
gratitude to Mayor Hahn and Councilman Garcetti for taking their time in
visiting the school.

For pictures from the visit, please visit

http://www.pilibos.org/
www.pilibos.org

ACNIS Releases Public Opinion Results on Const & Election Reforms

PRESS RELEASE
Armenian Center for National and International Studies
75 Yerznkian Street
Yerevan 375033, Armenia
Tel: (+374 – 1) 52.87.80 or 27.48.18
Fax: (+374 – 1) 52.48.46
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Website:

March 4, 2005

ACNIS Releases Public Opinion Results
on Constitutional and Election Code Reforms

Yerevan–The Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS)
today issued the results of a public poll on “Constitutional and Electoral
Reforms” which it conducted in February among 1500 citizens from Yerevan and
all of Armenia’s regions.

ACNIS founding director Raffi Hovannisian greeted the invited guests and
public participants with opening remarks. “I trust this first survey of the
year will provide a solid basis for interpreting and evaluating Armenian
public attitudes toward democratic values and for clarifying citizen
perceptions of key constitutional and electoral issues,” Hovannisian said.

ACNIS research coordinator Stepan Safarian focused in detail on the findings
of the opinion poll. Accordingly, a majority of surveyed citizens (70.7%) is
completely or partially familiar with the content of the Armenian
Constitution, while 29.3% are not familiar at all. 29.5% of those who are
more or less familiar with the provisions of the Constitution think that
whatever is written in it is not implemented at all, 46.5% believe it to be
partially implemented, and only 2.3% completely implemented, with 21.5%
finding it difficult to answer. 38.5% of participating citizens are of the
opinion that the Constitution needs reform, 10.4% feel the necessity for a
new Constitution, whereas 38.8% conclude that more important than reforms is
the systematic implementation of its existing provisions.

As for society’s expectations from the constitutional reforms, 37.1% of
citizens expect expansion of human rights and improvement of constitutional
guarantees for their protection, 3.9% the opposite, that is restriction of
human rights and freedoms, 14.4% clarification of relations among the
president, parliament, government, and judicial branch of power, 10.9%
limitation of the president’s prerogatives, 8.2% raising the role of the
National Assembly, 8.7% stipulation of mechanisms for the real independence
of judicial authority, 4.5% raising the self-sufficiency of local
government, and 7.2% fulfillment of Armenia’s commitments before the Council
of Europe. 26.2% have no expectations, and 9.7% find it difficult to answer.

11.6% of respondents prefer a presidential system of government, 7.7% a
parliamentary system, and 16.7% a semi-presidential one, whereas 51.7% think
what is most important is democracy. 5.6% of citizens opine that the prime
minister should be appointed by the president without the National Assembly’
s consent, 14.9% by the National Assembly without the president’s consent,
24.9% by the president with the National Assembly’s consent, and 20.9% by
the National Assembly with the president’s consent. As for the dissolution
of parliament, 13% of the respondents assert that the president should
retain the right to dissolve it and call new elections, 42.5% think it
should be dissolved only by referendum held by demand of a certain number of
voters, and 15.5% are generally against its dissolution. 25.1% of citizens
are convinced that courts will be just and impartial if judges are elected
by the people, 8.3% if the National Assembly appoints and dismisses judges,
and but 4% if the president appoints and dismisses them.

Among the surveyed public, 26.7% consider presidential elections to be most
important, 6.3% parliamentary polls, and 3.5% municipal elections, with
46.6% finding all of them to be equally significant. 17.9%, however, say
they have not taken part in the elections of recent years. 15% of these are
not interested in politics, 35.2% have abstained because of falsifications,
and 11.3% are convinced that no candidate deserved to be elected. 40.9% hold
that the results of the 2003 presidential elections raise the most doubts
from the point of view of their legitimacy, 24.8% cite the elections of
1996, and 22.2% those of 1998, while 33.6% maintain that they are equally
untrustworthy. A plurality (38.9%) of responding citizens asserts that the
most unfair parliamentary elections were held in 2003. As for local
elections, 4.7% think the 1996 results are the most suspect, 6.4% those of
1999, and 16.7% those of 2002.

As for the major factor influencing elections held in Armenia, 39.9%
pinpoint money, 36.8% pro-incumbent administrative levers, 6.9% the mass
media, 4.3% the candidate’s ideological and party belonging, and only 5.7%
the candidate’s personal characteristics. 51.4% of citizens believe that
elections will be freer and fairer if the army is deprived of the right to
vote. Nonetheless, there also are other ways of reducing election
falsifications. 21.4% think elections will not be falsified or will be
falsified in smaller measure if the election commissions represent equally
all the parties competing in the electoral process, 18.1% if commissions are
composed not of political party representatives but of neutral specialists,
18.8% if the commission head or certain members are appointed by
international observation missions, and 17.3% if the president does not
possess the prerogative to appoint commission members.

The second item on the day’s agenda was a presentation by Constitutional
Court Justice Felix Tokhian on “Securing Constitutional and Electoral Rights
in the Armenian Reality.” “The ideology of the current Constitution is
intended to ensure the country’s governability, but it should instead be
focused on citizens’ rights, that is the establishment of democratic
precepts,” he underscored.

An alternative conception on the constitutional and electoral code reforms
was presented by Grigor Ghonjeyan of the United Labor Party. He detailed the
controversial provisions of the reform draft proposed by his party,
referring particularly to the impermissibility of depriving people of
citizenship, the manner of alienating property, the role of the church, the
ban on dual citizenship, and the functions of the branches of power. “We
have been guided by the principle of making the human being the axis of the
Constitution,” he emphasized.

“To what extent have the suggestions of the Venice Commission been taken
into account?” Political scientist and constitutional lawyer Vardan
Poghosian reflected on the two drafts proposed by the governing coalition
and the United Labor Party, underlining the importance of clarifying the
president’s constitutional-legal status as well as the relations between
president and government, government and parliament. “The president should
not have the prerogative to dismiss the prime minister, as he is not the
head of the executive branch under the current system,” he said, adding that
the president’s authority should be limited to guaranteeing the country’s
defense capacity and national security. In his opinion, the constitutional
reforms should be based on the draft of 2001 approved by the Venice
Commission.

The formal interventions were followed by contributions by former Prime
Minister Khosrov Harutiunian of the Christian Democratic Party; former
presidential adviser Levon Zurabian; Ruben Torosian of the Human
Rights-Democracy Party; Noyan Tapan news agency political analyst Davit
Petrosian; Albert Baghdasarian of the National Democratic Union; Petros
Makeyan of Democratic Fatherland; lawyer Norair Yeghiazarian; and several
others.

47.2% of respondents participating in the ACNIS poll are male and 52.8%
female; 7.2% are 17-20 years of age, 24.8% 21-30, 23.1% 31-40, 22.8% 41-50,
14.2% 51-60, 7.1% 61-70, and 0.8% 71 or above. 44.4% of them have received a
higher education, 12.8% incomplete higher, 20.5% specialized secondary, 16%
secondary, and 2.3% incomplete secondary training. 58.3% are actively
employed and 23.9% unemployed, 5.2% are pensioners, 1.7% welfare recipients,
and 10.7% students. Urban residents constitute 61.9% of the citizens
surveyed, while rural residents make up 38.1%. 30.7% of all respondents hail
from Yerevan, and the rest are from outside the capital city.

Founded in 1994 by Armenia’s first Minister of Foreign Affairs Raffi K.
Hovannisian and supported by a global network of contributors, ACNIS serves
as a link between innovative scholarship and the public policy challenges
facing Armenia and the Armenian people in the post-Soviet world. It also
aspires to be a catalyst for creative, strategic thinking and a wider
understanding of the new global environment. In 2005, the Center focuses
primarily on civic education, conflict resolution, and applied research on
critical domestic and foreign policy issues for the state and the nation.

For further information on the Center or the full graphics of the poll
results, call (3741) 52-87-80 or 27-48-18; fax (3741) 52-48-46; e-mail
[email protected] or [email protected]; or visit or

http://www.acnis.am/pr/creforms/Socio11eng.pdf
www.acnis.am
www.acnis.am

STOP NOW – New Anti-Trafficking Initiative

Civil Georgia, Georgia
March 4 2005

STOP NOW – New Anti-Trafficking Initiative

On March 1, 2005 the Georgian NGO Human Rights Information and
Documentation Center held a presentation of the new STOP NOW
anti-trafficking project. The project was launched this February and
is being implemented in partnership with the Center of Research and
Action on Peace (KEDE) (Greece).

The project is financed by the International Economic Relations and
Development Co-operation (YDAS-Hellenic Aid) – General Secretariat of
the Hellenic Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Besides Georgia, this
project is being implemented in Moldova, Belarus and Armenia.

The goal of STOP NOW is to confront, prevent and combat human
trafficking, specifically women trafficking for the purposes of
sexual and labor exploitation. It also aims at supporting the victims
of trafficking as well as raising public awareness regarding the
issue.

Initially the project was launched by a Greek Organization Center of
Research and Action on Peace (KEDE) in December 2001 in Greece,
Ukraine and Albania. The main goal of the project was to prevent
trafficking and ensure support for the victims of trafficking in
order to facilitate their reintegration into the society. (Please see
detailed information on the web-site )

Under the aegis of the project the following activities will be
implemented in Georgia:

· Information meetings and round tables for the
representatives of governmental as well as non-governmental
organizations working on trafficking issues;

· Trainings for socially excluded women, students, journalists
and representatives of NGO sector;

· Legal consultations and assistance;

· Publishing and distributing booklets and other information
materials;

· Establishment of information database and launching a
web-site.

Human Rights Information and Documentation Center is ready to
cooperate with the governmental and non-governmental organizations
working in the field of trafficking.

According to Ucha Nanuashvili, director of HRIDC, NGOs are going to
monitor the implementation of the 2005-2006 Action Plan to Combat
Trafficking, as well as to lobby the ratification of the
international conventions on trafficking by the Parliament.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.stop-trafficking.org

ANKARA: Double Genocide Correction from US Yerevan Ambassador

Anadolu Agency, Turkey
March4 2005

Double Genocide Correction from US Yerevan Ambassador
By Anadolu News Agency (aa)
Published: Friday 04, 2005
zaman.com

The US Ambassador to Yerevan John Evans has had to apologize twice
for use of the term “genocide” about events in Armenia, once to the
US Administration and once to Turkey.

Evans criticized Washington’s policy last week and said that Armenian
events should be called “genocide” from now on. Top level
administration of US State Department reacted to this statement and
made Evans issue a retraction on the Embassy’s internet site. The
ambassador said in the message that the term “genocide” was his own
evaluation and this did not indicate the US policy, which had not
changed. Evans said that he was sorry for causing a misunderstanding.
But Evans hid the term ‘genocide’ within the message of apology
saying “there is no change in the policy of the US over the Armenian
genocide.” The Turkish ambassador to Washington Faruk Logoglu reacted
to this message and the Washington administration approved Turkey’s
demand and made Evans correct the message of apology. Logoglu
reminded the US State Department that the US does not recognize the
Armenian genocide, but the term was used in the message of apology of
the US Yerevan Ambassador. Logoglu noted that a term that is not
accepted by USA could not be used in a statement of policy.