Rossie: World still looks away from genocide

Press & Sun-Bulletin, NY
April 20 2005

Rossie: World still looks away from genocide

“Murder will out.”

DAVID ROSSIE Commentary

— Don Quixote,
Miguel de Cervantes

Cervantes apparently never met an official of the Turkish government.

We are coming up on the 90th anniversary of the Armenian genocide in
which an estimated 1.5 million Armenians were slaughtered by the
Ottoman Turks.

The official position of Turkish governments ever since has been:
Genocide? What genocide? The Turks were and are like the Bush
administration. If you never admit to a mistake or a wrong-doing,
there’s no need to apologize for it.

For the record, the blood-letting began on April 24, 1915, and
continued through 1923, five years after the end of World War I, in
which the Turks came out losers. By then the Armenians were a
scattered remnant in their native land. Some of the survivors made
their way to America, which is why Binghamton today has a small but
vibrant Armenian community.

And come Saturday, members of that community will hold a
commemorative service recalling the start of the genocide. In years
past, I learned from Dr. Gary Fattal, Armenian community members have
planted trees at the south end of the Washington Street bridge — a
symbolic remembrance of the start of a new life in America.

This year, the group has planned something different, the
installation of a monument at that location. The ceremony will begin
at 11 a.m. on the 23rd, and local dignitaries have been invited to
join members of the Armenian community for the event.

Following the installation, a reception will be held at St. Gregory’s
Armenian Church hall, 12 Corbett Ave., Binghamton.

Elsewhere around the country, Armenian communities will observe the
anniversary on Saturday and Sunday. One of the largest observances
will be in New York City’s Times Square, where thousands are expected
to attend a noon rally. The rally will be followed by an ecumenical
requiem service at St. Patrick’s Roman Catholic Church, 50th Street
and 5th Avenue, from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Part of the observance of the genocide’s anniversary is a call for
the Turkish government to acknowledge what was done and apologize for
it. Armenians aren’t seeking reparations, at least not that I know
of, but the Turks, for nearly a century, have stuck to their denials
of responsibility. Perhaps they fear that if they owned up, demands
for reparations would follow.

Almost as shocking as the Turks’ arrogance is the rest of the world’s
indifference. The Wilson administration ignored the Armenians’ pleas
for help, and in what was to become a pattern, the United States and
most of the rest of what is laughingly referred to as the “free
world” pretended not to notice what Nazi Germany was doing to the
Jews, gypsies, homosexuals and assorted others until it was to late
to do anything about it.

The slaughter of a half-million Africans in Rwanda a decade ago
became part of that pattern, and the Clinton administration dithered
and did nothing.

Today, the Sudanese Army and its janjaweed cohort are raping and
killing at will in Darfur, and while the Bush administration has
deplored it and sent material aid to the victims, it has made no
attempt to intervene. And how could it even if it wanted to? With the
Iraqi tar baby firmly in its grasp, it can’t reach out to anyone.

The lesson for oppressive governments over the years? If you’re not
sitting on a billion barrels of oil, you can get away with just about
anything.

Changing history part II

Changing history part II
By Mehmet Basoglu
Published: 4/20/2005

Daily Targum , Rutgers College, NJ
April 20 2005

The Rutgers University Armenian Club hung up its genocide commemoration
banner Thursday in front of Brower Commons on the College Avenue
campus. The club organized its annual commemoration Saturday afternoon,
which marked the upcoming 90th anniversary of Armenian rebel arrests
by the Ottoman government. These activities coincide with the Armenian
Diaspora’s efforts to push their commonly accepted allegations to a
global scale as The Republic of Turkey moves into its accession phase
with the European Union.

Historians and scholars who have explored this issue have been bullied
by the Armenian Diaspora into either keeping silent on the matter or
accepting the Armenian version of events. The most radical example of
this trend took place on October 4, 1977 when UCLA history Professor
Stanford Shaw’s house was bombed by extremists after he refused to
accept the Armenian community’s accounts of World War 1.

Most notably, Princeton University Professor Emeritus of Near Eastern
studies Bernard Lewis, who has advised the U.S. State Department in
the past on issues concerning the Middle East, was sued by Armenian
civic organizations in France after expressing his views during an
interview with French newspaper Le Monde on November 16, 1993.

Lewis stated, “There was an Armenian problem for the Turks created
by the advance of the Russians … there was a population with an
anti-Turkish sentiment in the Ottoman Empire who sought independence
.. overtly sympathized with the Russians advancing from the Caucasus.
.. and the Turks had trouble to maintain order under the prevailing.
war conditions. For the Turks it was necessary to take the punitive and
preventive measure against a hostile population in a region threatened
by foreign invasion … No one has any doubt that terrible events took
place; the Armenians, as well as the Turks suffered and perished in
equal measure.”

It is hard to overlook the historical data that refutes Armenian
claims.

At the end of World War I, the Ottoman Empire was effectually
controlled by the Allied Powers. British, French, Italian and Greek
forces occupied present-day Turkey and the remains of the Ottoman
Empire, including present day Iraq. During this period, Allied Forces
rounded up 144 Ottoman officials and conducted war crimes tribunals
on the island of Malta. Like the Nuremberg trials that followed World
War II, the Malta tribunals tried leaders of enemy forces based on
research findings. After three years of investigation, all of the
Ottoman officers tried by their enemy counterparts were released due
to a lack of evidence.

This is especially striking given the deep-rooted cultural mistrust of
the Muslim empire by European leaders. European states had been waiting
for the downfall of the Ottoman Empire for centuries while eyeing its
land as potential colonial possessions during World War I. The late
scholar Edward Said pointed at this widespread European attitude in
his scholarly work “Orientalism” when he noted, “Until the end of the
seventeenth century the ‘Ottoman peril'” lurked alongside Europe to
represent for the whole of Christian civilization a constant danger,
and in time European civilization incorporated that peril and its
lore, its great events, figures, virtues, and vices, as something
woven into the fabric of life.”

Despite these cultural biases, Allied Forces justly tried Ottoman
officials and gave authority to the rule of law.

According to Armenian-American newspaper Asbarez, the Turkish
government has opened its state archives and called upon Armenian and
Turkish historians to work together. The Armenian government openly
rejected this call, claiming that the work of historians is done on
this issue.

The Armenian Diaspora’s unwillingness to cooperate with Turkish
entities on this matter is a result of the organizations that lead
the community. The Dashnaksutiun Party (also known as the Armenian
Revolutionary Federation) was founded in 1890. In the Armenian
Revolutionary Movement, Armenian researcher Louise Nalbandian
chronicles the mission of the Dashnak Party established in a general
congress in 1892. According to Nalbandian, the congress declared aims,
which included, “To organize fighting bands … To use every means to
arm the people … To stimulate fighting and to terrorize government
officials, informers, traitors, usurers and every kind of exploiter
… To expose government establishments to looting and destruction.”

The Dashnaks, along with the Marxist leaning Hunchak Party, fought
against the Ottoman state well before World War I. Ottoman Muslim
communities in Eastern Anatolia comprised mostly of Turks, Kurds and
Circassians saw the brunt of Armenian terrorist activity in the late
19th and early 20th century. Turkish state archives document 523,955
civilian casualties committed by Dashnak and Hunchak separatists’
violent acts during this period, including a 1920 assault on Nakhchivan
(present-day Azerbaijan) that resulted in 64,408 deaths.

Turkish and Kurdish bandits savagely retaliated in many instances to
the attacks on their communities, in many cases killing thousands of
innocent civilians. On April 24, 1915, Ottoman authorities issued
arrests on the leaders and organizers of the Armenian revolts,
who they held responsible for intercommunal warfare between Muslims
and Armenians in Eastern Anatolia. It was still very difficult to
distinguish between normal Armenian civilians and terrorist elements,
so the Ottoman government relocated Armenian civilians in Eastern
Anatolia to the Western parts of the empire. Warfare between Dashnak
separatists and the Ottomans continued to rage well past the end of
World War I, until 1922, one year before the foundation of the modern
Turkish republic.

The very same organizations that orchestrated these acts form the
foundations of the Diaspora. The Armenian National Committee of
America, which is the second richest ethnic lobby in America after
the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, was founded by and is
still controlled by Dashnak Party leaders, as is Armenian-American
news outlet Asbarez.

According to most sources, 1.5 million Armenians resided in Eastern
Anatolia before the conflicts. Turkish sources claim about 300,000
Armenians perished during this time period while Armenians claim
genocide with numbers that would equal the complete decimation of the
Ottoman Armenian population. Armenian claims don’t fit the statistics,
since over 1 million Armenian Americans reside in the United States
today with another million in Europe and Canada combined, as well
as 6 percent of Lebanon, all descending from the Eastern Anatolian
Armenian refugee population.

The affluence of the Armenian community has created the strain in
this debate. Groups like ANCA pump millions of dollars around the
world into anti-Turkish lobbying in order to fulfill a revolutionary
national destiny.

The wealth and prosperity of the Armenian community can be attributed
to their merchant class status in the Ottoman Empire. One example of
this is the continuing success of the Zildjian drum and percussion
company. According to a December article in the Economist, Zildjian
is the oldest running corporation in America. It was founded in 1623
in Istanbul and moved its headquarters to Massachusetts in 1929.

Armenians and Turks co-existed in peace for nearly one thousand
years until ethnic nationalism emerged as an ideology in the crumbling
Ottoman Empire of the late 19th century. Today, generations of Armenian
Americans are raised to believe in an alleged genocide, which is based
on the slanted accounts of the British Blue Book that functioned as
war-time propaganda. True progress will never be made on this issue
until the Armenian Diaspora examines the roots of their own identity.

Mehmet Basoglu is a Rutgers College senior majoring in political
science, Middle Eastern studies and journalism. His column,
“Westernized Easterner,” appears on alternate Wednesdays. He welcomes
comments at [email protected].

Change comes to Syria’s Lebanon ‘home’

Change comes to Syria’s Lebanon ‘home’
By Sebastian Usher

BBC News
April 20 2005

BBC News, Anjar in Lebanon — The road leading to the Syrian border in
Lebanon’s Bekaa valley is usually full of dilapidated trucks wheezing
pollution as they struggle towards Damascus.

But in the past few weeks, it has seen another, swifter kind of traffic
as Syrian army vehicles rush backwards and forwards across the border,
carrying the accumulated baggage – military and otherwise – of their
30-year presence in Lebanon.

Anjar has been the Lebanon home of Syria’s feared intelligence service

If you trace the vehicles back to their point of departure, you are
likely to arrive in the lovingly tended, palm tree-lined main avenue of
the small town of Anjar, just a few kilometres from the Syrian border.

Squeezed up against a rocky hillside – beyond which lies Syria –
Anjar’s main claim to fame is a ruin from the early Islamic Omayyad
dynasty, rising in gentle arches on the edge of town.

Armenian legacy

The other focal point is an Armenian church at the end of the main
street, from where you can look across to the other side of the Bekaa
valley, whose mountain tops are still white with snow.

Next to the church is a modernist memorial to the heroic last stand
of Armenians at Moussa Dagh in Turkish Armenia against the Ottoman
Empire in 1915.

It was from there that the town’s inhabitants were finally brought
to Anjar by French troop ships in 1939.

The transplanted Armenians turned what was then a swamp into a town –
though at a heavy cost, with many dying of malaria.

It is a history that the town’s current inhabitants are intensely
proud of, showing visitors the original plan of the town and the deed
to its ownership on the slightest pretext.

The Armenian identity of Anjar remains intact, with street signs in
three languages – Arabic, French and Armenian.

Intelligence base

But in the past 30 years, the town has had another, less
tourist-friendly face.

SYRIA IN LEBANON

Military intervention began in 1976 30,000 troops in Lebanon during
1980s, currently 14,000 Syrian forces helped end Lebanese civil war
in 1990 and maintain peace Calls for Syrian withdrawal increased
in 2000 after Israeli pull-out from southern Lebanon UN resolution
calling for foreign forces’ withdrawal in Sept 2004

Q&A: Syria in Lebanon

The Syrian army chose it as one of its main military bases in the
Bekaa and – more disturbingly in the eyes of most Lebanese – as the
headquarters of its feared intelligence services.

The people of Anjar have grown to accept and even to benefit from the
Syrian presence in the town, but their dread of Syria’s intelligence
operation has never gone away.

It provides its own sinister focal point – to match the Omayyad ruins
and the Armenian church – in a nondescript-looking house, guarded
by an unsmiling phalanx of unshaven Syrian intelligence agents –
mukhabarat in Arabic – in cheap leather jackets.

An Armenian jewellery maker in Anjar’s main restaurant, al-Shams –
still frequented by Syrian officers – was loath even to say the name
of the best-known inhabitant of the house.

But he squeezed it out in the end with a defensive laugh: Rustum
Ghazzali, Syria’s head of intelligence in Lebanon and a man who has
made the country’s political elite quail before his threats.

Deserted checkpoints

Driving around the town with a young student from Anjar and his friend,
I asked to take a photo of the house. They kept promising that I could,
but by the time they felt it was safe, the intelligence HQ was just
a dot in the distance. Anywhere closer, they were scared the Syrians
might spot us.

Like the Syrian soldiers, large numbers of Syrian workers in Anjar
have been packing up

But they did show me the Syrian troop positions speckled around Anjar,
even hard up against the Omayyad ruins.

They pointed out various houses that the Syrian top brass had
requisitioned from locals – usually without payment or compensation.

Outside one, a removal truck was loading up. The Syrian military
presence in the Bekaa has already become desultory.

Most of the checkpoints they used to man – aimed, most Lebanese
believe, simply at bullying the locals – are now deserted.

But the mukhabarat were still operating on the streets of Anjar,
watching and waiting.

The people of Anjar are ambiguous about the Syrians leaving.

At their height, there were about 2,000 Syrian troops there – about
half the town’s population.

The soldiers are poorly paid, so they have not been the greatest of
customers for the more upscale local businesses, but they have been
essential for the hundreds of small shops that line the road towards
the Syrian border. Many of those are now closing down.

Syrian labourers

Even more important for the local economy have been the thousands of
Syrian labourers, who have worked the fields and built the houses of
Anjar for a fraction of what Lebanese workers would be paid.

Many are now leaving with the troops, fearful of their future in
Lebanon.

This was brought home to me while I sat in the office of the chief
official in the town, community leader Haroutian Lakissian.

One of his Syrian workers came in to share his troubles. A friend of
his had just gone back to Syria after receiving threats, and he was
thinking about doing the same.

But in the end, he told Mr Lakissian he would rather be beaten in
Lebanon than be penniless in Syria.

Just then there was a phone call for Mr Lakissian. A Syrian
acquaintance wanted to know if it was safe to drive into Lebanon with
Damascus number plates.

Lebanese forces are starting to deploy in the town

The Mr Lakissian reassured him, then expressed his anger that Syrians
ready to spend good money in Lebanon should be scared off.

Later, in the dark, cramped room of one of his Syrian workers,
plastered with pin-ups of Lebanese female pop singers, a garage owner
told me his workforce was leaving too.

The numbers are vague, but several people in Anjar told me that about
40% of the Syrian workers had now gone. The effect, they told me,
was likely to be devastating on this year’s harvest.

The people in Anjar have one other big concern about the Syrian
troops’ departure.

Loyal as they maintain they are to Lebanese nationhood, some still feel
that the Syrians have given them an important measure of protection
over the years.

I asked the jewellery maker in al-Shams restaurant what the locals
were afraid of.

Of Anjar’s Muslim neighbours was his answer – though he delivered it
in more colourful terms.

Others told me the same story. Their almost crime-free little paradise
of pristine streets and civic pride was now at risk.

‘Need for protection’

Mr Lakissian, the community leader, conceded to me that some of
the people in the surrounding countryside accused them of being
collaborators.

He said there was also a rising tide of rhetoric questioning the
right of the Armenians of Anjar to be in Lebanon at all.

“The town needs protection,” he said.

The Lebanese army was meant to move in the day after the Syrians left,
he told me.

I’d seen some Lebanese soldiers driving through Anjar earlier.
Apparently, they were scouting out the Syrian positions in preparation
for taking them over.

As I was leaving Anjar, one of the locals who had been showing me
around – a twentysomething with a computer shop on the road to the
border and a sideline as a DJ – told me that I should come back after
the Syrians had left, as people would feel much freer to talk then.

And he echoed what others in Anjar had said to me, that they were
glad to see the Syrian troops go, but equally anxious to see the
Syrian workers return.

“Perhaps in a month or two when things have calmed down,” he told me
as we both looked down the now darkened road to Damascus, lighted
up sporadically by one or two of the little shops that had stayed
open late.

Choice of name hints at anti-war stance

Choice of name hints at anti-war stance
By DUNCAN CAMPBELL

The Guardian – United Kingdom
Apr 20, 2005

The choice of the name Benedict by the new Pope could be symbolic of
his desire to emphasise the importance of Europe in his papacy as St
Benedict is the patron saint of Europe.

The previous holder of the name, Pope Benedict XV, was strongly
associated with seeking a peaceful solution to the first world war.

St Benedict of Nursia is known as the founder of western monasticism
in the sixth century and started the monastery of Monte Cassino. He is
the patron of many aspects of life, including farm workers, architects
and monks but, most significantly perhaps, of Europe.

“He [the new Pope] is very concerned about the state of Christianity
in Europe and that might be one of his reasons for choosing the
name,” Simon Caldwell, news editor of the Catholic Herald, said last
night. The most recent Pope Benedict had been a champion of Catholic
missions, he said.

Some commentators saw the choice as linking with Benedict XV’s first
world war efforts and a possible attempt to continue his immediate
predecessor’s anti-war stance.

In 1917, Benedict XV issued a peace proposal which urged that for
“the material force of arms should be substituted the moral force
of law”. He called for a just solution to territorial disputes,
“notably those relating to Armenia, the Balkan states, and the
territories composing the ancient kingdom of Poland”.

He was also famous for not seeing Catholicism as removed from the rest
of the Christian church and one of his sayings was that “Christianity
is my family and Catholicism is my name.”

Pope Benedict XV sought peaceful solution to first world war

Recognition Of Armenian Genocide Common To All Mankind

RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE COMMON TO ALL MANKIND

Pan Armenian News
20.04.2005 04:12

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The formation of the Armenian-Turkish Commission
on Genocide may be useful not for the investigation of the fact of
Genocide but for the discussion of the issue and search of ways of its
resolution, Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Margarian stated during
“Ultimate Crime, Ultimate Challenge. Human Rights and Genocide”
International Conference today. In his words, if the Commission is
formed with this purpose the Armenian party will have no objections. As
A. Margarian noted, the recognition of the Armenian Genocide is
essential for the prevention of such crimes against humanity and is
common to all mankind.

BAKU: Azerbaijan, Pakistan: coop in defense field expanding

AZERBAIJAN, PAKISTAN: COOPERATION IN DEFENSE FIELD EXPANDING
[April 20, 2005, 15:05:41]

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
April 20 2005

On April 19, Minister of Defense, colonel-general Safar Abiyev has met
the general director of Educational Department of the Headquarters
of Armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, rear admiral
Mohammad Nasat Raffi and delegation of department.

Having welcomed the visitors, Minister of Defense has noted that
Pakistan is one of the first states, which have recognized independence
of Azerbaijan. Recent official visit of the head of Azerbaijan state
Ilham Aliyev to Pakistan has even more pulled together two brotherly
states and peoples.

Having thanked colonel-general Safar Abiyev for warm meeting, rear
admiral Mohammad Nasat Raffi has noted that visit of delegation of the
Armed Forces of Pakistan to Azerbaijan is great honor for them, having
emphasized that between the Armed Forces of two states there have
been established fine relations. He has told: “Support which Pakistan
renders to Azerbaijan in the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict, and Azerbaijan – in Kashmir question, confirms presence
of very sincere relations between two states. Pakistan offers its
support for protection of Azerbaijan against any aggression”.

Having emphasized that great leader Heydar Aliyev supported territorial
integrity of Pakistan, and that now the President of Azerbaijan
Ilham Aliyev continues this line, colonel-general Safar Abiyev
has told: “Cooperation of Azerbaijan and Pakistan in the field of
defense continuously develops. Having expressed to management of the
Pakistan state and the Ministry of Defense of this country gratitude
for creation of conditions for education of the representatives of
Armed Forces of Azerbaijan in military educational institutions of
Pakistan, he has told: “We are going to achieve further deepening of
this cooperation”.

Colonel-general Safar Abiyev had exchange of views on
military-political conditions in region of Southern Caucasus and
the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. He has told:
“Despite of heavy consequences of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict,
the economy of our country successfully develops. The nearest months
the BTC MEP will be put into operation, and in 2006 construction
of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan gas main will start. Due to gradual
strengthening of economy of Azerbaijan, liberation of the lands from
under the Armenian invaders becomes more real. Now the OSCE Minsk
Group is engaged in settlement of the conflict. However, their activity
remains ineffectual. If the conflict will not be resolved by peace way,
Azerbaijan should be ready to clearing the territories by all means”.

In his turn, rear admiral M. Raffi has told: “We, the Pakistanis,
well know what means loss of 20 percent of the lands. We support
the position of Azerbaijan in the mentioned question. Therefore,
Azerbaijan should act only from the position of the strong state. We
are ready to the further strengthening cooperation with Azerbaijan
in the field of defense”.

Minister of Defense has carried out with the visitor exchange of views
on the Armed forces of Azerbaijan, their maintenance and system of
military education. He has told: “Each state itself should prepare
the officer staff for the Armed Forces. Today, we have achieved
it. But as required we direct our staff to receive education in
military educational institutions of the foreign states, including
brotherly Pakistan”.

The visitor has once again emphasized that Pakistan stands ready to
render Azerbaijan any assistance.

Having expressed confidence of it, colonel-general Safar Abiyev said:
“In Azerbaijan, we always with pride speak about the Islamic Republic
of Pakistan. We are proud of this friendship and brotherhood”.

Nagorno Karabakh President Arrived In Yerevan

NAGORNO KARABAKH PRESIDENT ARRIVED IN YEREVAN

Pan Armenian News
19.04.2005 08:06

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Nagorno Karabakh President Arkady Ghukasian
arrived in Yerevan today to take part in the events dedicated to
the 90-th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, NKR Foreign Ministry
reported. Arkady Ghukasian is also expected to deliver a speech at
the conference entitled “Grave Crimes, Actual Challenges, Human Rights
and Genocide”.

New pressures on Turkey …

Newropeans Magazine, France
April 20 2005

New pressures on Turkey …
Written by Elodie Boussonnière

Negotiations on Turley’s accession to the EU is about to start and
leaders of the 25 EU members are expected to give their approbation
to begin talks with Ankara as early as October 2005. Turkey needs to
prepare itself for tough discussions as various delicate questions
such as the “so-called Armenian” issue will undoubtedly be raised.
Indeed, various EU member states, mainly France, affirmed the
Armenian issue will certainly be part of the essential questions
asked during the negotiations process but will not be a pre-condition
for accession into the EU.

As Armenia is preparing the upcoming 90th anniversary of the WWI
tragedy on the 24th of April 2005, French Foreign Minister Michel
Barnier raises the question of the “so-called Armenian genocide”. He
demands Turkey to recognize the massacre of more than 1, 5 million
Armenians during the final years of the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to
1917 as genocide. “Turkey has a duty to remember” he says and talking
about the Armenian question “it is a question that we will raise in
the course of negotiations, and we have around 10 years to raise it.”

As many commentators alleged, France’s position on this question is
also supported by the leaders of the large Armenian community living
in France (approximately 400 000 people). In this respect, the
attitude of France has been interpreted by many EU politicians and by
Turkey as an excuse of France to delay Turkey’s negotiations and to
confirm its reluctance in admitting Turkey into the EU. For the
record, only 38% of Frenchmen and women would be in favor of a
European enlargement towards Turkey.

France is not the only country which has officially recognized the
death of millions of Armenians during the First World War as genocide
(French Parliament voted in 2001 and officially qualified the
“Armenian” tragedy as genocide). Indeed, 14 other nations have
recognized the slaughtering of Ottoman Armenians as a “policy of
extermination” of Turkey during the WWI, among them Russia, Lebanon,
Uruguay, and Switzerland, Greece and Canada (and some US states).

Ankara will not bow…

>>From Ankara, the whole story does not sound quit the same as in
Europe and elsewhere. On the 7th of April 2005, Foreign minister
Abdullah Gul affirmed Turkey is very clear about its position on the
problem and “has never and will never recognize any so-called
genocide”. The minister also refuted accusations and declared “What
needs to be done is research, investigate and discuss history, based
on documents and without prejudice, the basis of such discussions
should be scientific and not political”. Mr. Gul also said the
pressures on Turkey were high and should not be taken into account
during the EU negotiations process. He also mentioned the very
developed and organized campaigns set up in Armenia and in Europe to
“discredit Turkey”.

According to the general opinion, Turkey has no attention whatsoever
to bow to the pressures of the European Union and admit that the
million Armenians deaths was the tragic result of Turkish’s policies
during the war. Ahmet Necdet Sezer, the Turkish President said “It is
wrong and unjust for our European friends to press Turkey on these
issues…these claims upset and hurt the feelings of the Turkish
nation”. Ankara has also pointed out that many Muslims, mainly Turks
and Kurds were killed during the same years.

As for Armenia, which borders Turkey to the North, political leaders
say they will continue their claims to seek for international
recognition of the Armenian slaughter. The Armenian issue is a
long-lasting problem between Turkey and Armenia; therefore, Mr.
Abdullah Gul invited Armenia to create a joint commission of
historians and specialists of both countries which will determine
whether the events can be qualified as genocide or not. So far,
Armenia has not replied to the Turkish invitation.

–Boundary_(ID_sZvJRoUyCshWm85NSqRGyg)–

Mayor joins Washington, D.C. observance of Armenian Genocide

Mayor joins Washington, D.C. observance of Armenian Genocide

Providence Journal , RI
April 20 2005

01:00 AM EDT on Wednesday, April 20, 2005

WARWICK — Mayor Scott Avedisian will be in Washington for a Capital
Hill ceremony this evening marking the 90th anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide.

The the two-hour observance, arranged by Congressmen Frank Pallone Jr.,
D-N.J., and Joe Knollenberg, R-Minn., is slated for 6:30 p.m. in the
Cannon Caucus Room.

Among the expected participants are survivors of the 1915-1923 massacre
of some 1.5 million Armenians at the hands of the Ottoman Turks.

The keynote speakers will be Henry Morgenthau III, whose grandfather,
Henry Morgenthau, was the U.S. ambassador to Turkey during the
years of the genocide, and Dr. Ryan LaHurd, president of the Near
East Foundation.

The Armenian flag will be lowered to half-staff at Warwick City Hall
on April 25 next Monday in recognition of Armenian Martyrs Day.

“To this day, the Turkish government has not acknowledged that the
genocide ever occurred,” Avedisian said. “Armenian Martyrs Day is
recognized by many as a way to remember the past and to bring dignity
to the Armenian martyrs and pray for their repose.”

No Armenian Genocide For EU, Only Holocaust

NO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE FOR EU, ONLY HOLOCAUST

A1plus

| 14:04:41 | 20-04-2005 | Social |

Today in the international conference titled “Genocide and Human
Rights” which started in Yerevan one of the speakers was Juan Mendez,
UE Secretary General assistant on Genocide preventing affairs. The
latter mainly referred to the Jewish Genocide – the Holocaust.

In his speech Mr. Mendez did not speak about the Armenian Genocide. He
said that there is desire to understand and appreciated what
happened at the beginning of the previous century with the Armenian
Nation. According to him, the historical memory of the nation is
a good helper in that business and it will give the international
community a possibility to fully clear up everything. And what do
the participants of the conference think about the speech of Mendez?

“I am not elated”, said Ashot Melqonyan, head of the History
Institute. He considered Juan Mendez’s speech “diplomatic and not
telling anything”. “I think it would be better not to have that
speech”, concluded Ashot Melqonyan. Armen Rostomyan, representative of
the Armenian Revolutionary Federation Chief Body, and head of the NA
Standing Committee on Foreign Relations expressed his opinion shortly,
“He could have made the same speech in Turley as well”.

Norayr Davidyants, Minister of Health, did not want to comment on the
speech of Mendez, but said a little bit later, “It might have been
better”. RA Ombudsman Larissa Alaverdyan was not very attentive during
the Mendez’s speech, “At that moment I was speaking with the Irishman
(William Shabas, head of the Human Rights Irish Center)”.

“What is important for me is that Mendez has come to Armenia in that
connection”, added Mrs. Alaverdyan. For Michael Vegner, son of Armin
Vegner, German writer and eyewitness of the Armenian Genocide, the
speech of Mendez was not remarkable, “It was the speech of anyone
who would be in that post”.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress