Has Alcatel Finally Found Mr. Right?

Has Alcatel Finally Found Mr. Right?

Mike Quigley may not speak French, but he knows the company inside out

EUROPEAN BUSINESS

BusinessWeek
JULY 25, 2005

By Andy Reinhardt in Paris

Will the third time be the charm for Mike Quigley? In April the
52-year-old Anglo-Australian was named president and chief operating
officer of Paris telecom equipment giant Alcatel (ALA ). That puts him
first in line to succeed Serge Tchuruk as chief executive next May,
when he is supposed to step down at age 68. But Quigley is Alcatel’s
third heir apparent in four years. The others resigned for personal
or undisclosed reasons.

Quigley is more likely to stick around. While his two predecessors
came from outside the company, Quigley is a 34-year Alcatel veteran
who until recently headed the company’s North American unit and
its global fixed-line business. He also gets credit for scoring the
biggest sale in Alcatel’s history — a $1.7 billion deal last year
to supply equipment and services to SBC Communications Inc. (SBC )
for its “Project Lightspeed” broadband upgrade.

LANGUAGE BARRIER?

That’s not to say Quigley faces a cakewalk to the top. After steering
Alcatel through the telecom meltdown, Tchuruk apparently wants to enjoy
the rebound. He’s expected to ask the board to let him remain chairman
for two years after stepping down as CEO. The prospect of power-sharing
may have sparked the resignation of Quigley’s predecessor, Philippe
Germond, who couldn’t be reached for comment. But as an Alcatel lifer,
Quigley might be more patient. A potentially bigger stumbling block,
insiders say, is whether the board and employees are ready for a CEO
who doesn’t speak français. Quigley’s reply: His elevation to the
No. 2 spot “sends a strong signal that you don’t have to be French
to lead Alcatel.”

Not French, perhaps, but Tchuruk’s successor will have to be
plenty bold. Alcatel has overtaken Lucent Technologies Inc. (LU )
and Nortel Networks Corp. (NT ) in the past three years, thanks to
its broader product line. Dominance of broadband DSL gear helps,
but Alcatel also sells optical systems, low-cost mobile networks,
and satellites. Profits hit $338 million last year on revenues of
$15.2 billion. Still, Alcatel’s revenues and prices are under fierce
pressure, thanks in part to the emergence of Chinese rivals such
as Huawei Technologies Co. and ZTE Corp. Net margins, at 6.2%, are
the best since 1998, but nothing compared with Cisco Systems Inc.’s
(CSCO ) 23%. Quigley will have to wring out more profits and decide
whether to keep Alcatel so diversified.

Some argue that an Anglo-Saxon CEO could boost Alcatel’s global
standing. The company gets 58% of revenues from outside Western Europe,
and a third of its employees are in Asia or North America. Yet its
stock trades at a discount to its chief rivals, in part because
of Alcatel’s past as a state company and its continued role as an
instrument of French policy. Says Nomura Securities’ (NMR ) Richard
Windsor: “Some investors perceive it as being a bit opaque.”

The son of an Irish carpenter, Quigley was born in England but moved
with the family to Australia when he was 12. Summer jobs hanging
skins in a tannery and screwing tops onto bottles convinced him of
the value of education, Quigley says. He holds degrees in physics,
math, and electrical engineering.

After college, Quigley went to work for ITT Australia as a design
engineer. His group was eventually sold to Compagnie Générale
d’Electricité, which later morphed into Alcatel. At 38, the father
of three girls was diagnosed with life-threatening leukemia. After
reading up on immunology, Quigley decided to undergo a risky bone
marrow transplant, using cells supplied by his brother. He says the
disease changed him forever: “Once you’ve stared death in the face,
every day is a good day.” Life for Quigley could get even better if
he manages to break the succession curse at Alcatel.

–Boundary_(ID_ZQ5ivJNQ8a6a4K0U5ZM3CA)–

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_30/b3944082_mz054.htm?campaign_id=rss_magzn

ANKARA: Turkey’s EU Membership’s Impact on Black Sea Rim

Turkey’s EU Membership’s Impact on Black Sea Rim
By Sedat LACINER

Journal of Turkish weekly
July 18 2005

Countries that abut the Black Sea are more of a difficulty for Europe
in terms of integration, liberalization, and democratization. The
Black Sea littorals are Turkey, Bulgaria, Rumania, Moldavia, Ukraine,
the Russia, and Georgia. The country with the longest Black Sea
coast, Turkey, also has the strategic straits of Istanbul and
Çanakkale, which connect the Black Sea to the Mediterranean. However,
only those seven countries should not solely occupy one~Rs mind when
one speaks of the Black Sea basin. The Black Sea is the gateway that
connects the Caucasus to the rest world. Almost all Northern Balkan
territories are in this basin. Many Central and Eastern European
countries, through the Danube, link to the Mediterranean via the
Black Sea. While being a transit spot on the Asia-Europe route, it is
also a critical junction in the north-south course. With Bulgarian,
Romanian and prospect Turkish accession to the EU, the entire western
and southern coasts of the Black Sea would become EU territory, and
this would warrant a renewed interest in the need and potential for
Black Sea regional cooperation.[1]

The Black Sea Economic Cooperation Organization (BSEC) was
established in early 1990s, at Turkey~Rs initiative and bearing in
mind the fact that the Black Sea basin cannot be confined to
littorals, Albania, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Greece were invited to
join. While some groups like to think of the BSEC as an alternative
to the EU, on the contrary, it has functioned to complement the EU
enterprise by aiming integration and stability in this sub-region. As
the pioneer of the BSEC initiative, Turkey expects the organization
to improve economic relations, curtail ethnic conflict, and maintain
regional cooperation at all levels. This is precisely the reason why
Turkey worked hard to bring Armenia and Greece, both of which had
troubles with Turkey at their foundation stages, into the
organization. While its successes are limited in the commercial
domain, an investment bank has been formed within the BSEC framework.
In the realm of security, the Black Sea Peace Force (Blackseafor) has
become operational. Even though cooperation has been attained in
cultural and other matters, it has to be said that the results are
far from satisfactory. This is primarily due to the fact that the
political will and economic means have not been mustered at the
disposal of the organization. Yet, it was said that the Black Sea
basin is at the center of Europe~Rs most troublesome regions. A spring
of cooperation and healing to emanate from the Black Sea will
contribute to regions such as the Balkans, Caucasus, and Eastern
Europe that experience problems with liberalization and
democratization. The said regions also constitute a liability for the
EU. Both the EU and the US labor onerously to bring about progress in
the region, but complain about the lack of success. Every step that
Turkey takes towards EU membership will improve the Black Sea vision.
Greece is already an EU member, however, is not a Black Sea littoral
and lacks the strength to project its EU vision on the Black Sea. On
the other hand, the sea was once termed an ~SOttoman Turkish lake~T
when many ethnic and religious groups were living on the Black Sea
shores under Turkish rule. It can be said that the true power to
shape the Black Sea rests in the hands of Turkey and Russia.
Ukraine~Rs significance should also not go unnoticed. Nonetheless,
Turkey poses as the only country among the three to be able to extend
EU policies towards the region. Rumanian and Bulgarian accession to
the EU will undoubtedly contribute to that end, but true success
cannot be attained without taking the strongest countries into
consideration. Turkey, full member of the EU, will wield the dynamism
to bring the shores of the Black Sea closer. Meanwhile, with Turkey,
Bulgaria, and Rumania full members of the EU, more than half of the
Black Sea shores will become EU territories and will set a great
example to the rest of the region~Rs countries.

Concurrently, the EU will gain in different fields with the Black Sea
basin falling under EU jurisdiction. First of all, the transport
routes vital for the EU will be secured and properly regulated.
Environmental pollution on the Danube and the Black Sea will be
better controlled. Becoming an important energy route, the basin
would ensure the safety and stability of the routes as they carry
energy towards the EU. In addition to all these factors, the Black
Sea basin is a very important sector for EU-related drugs, arms, and
human trafficking. In case the Black Sea basin is not handled as a
whole, but by individual countries that work their way around
independently, no results would be obtained and the current problems
would simply remain. Turkey~Rs EU membership will hinder passage to
the Black Sea from the Middle East and the Caucasus. Along with
Rumanian and Bulgarian memberships, Georgia, Russia, Ukraine, and
Moldavia would be left and can be more easily secured within the BSEC
framework.

NATO~Rs widening towards Black Sea shores and Turkish support for that
cause can be a good example for EU enlargement. It should not be too
hard to imagine the impact on European security and integration of
having three NATO and EU members bordering the Black Sea.

Sedat LACINER (MA and PhD): Director, ISRO.

–Boundary_(ID_DVhavsu+vZBeok5X3qEF5Q)–

Armenian & Azeri FMs to prepare for presidents’ meeting

PanArmenian News Network
July 18 2005

ARMENIAN AND AZERI FMs TO PREPARE FOR PRESIDENTS’ MEETING

18.07.2005 03:37

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian and Azerbaijani Foreign Ministers are going
to discuss the Nagorno Karabakh in Moscow August 22 and get ready
for the meeting of the Presidents August 26 in Kazan, Azeri FM Elmar
Mamedyarov stated. “After the Warsaw meeting the Presidents instructed
the FMs to coordinate some details. It is not easy but the issues we
fail to settle will be submitted to the judgement of the Presidents”,
he noted. “I gave my consent to the meeting and am awaiting the
response of the Armenian party”, he added. In Mamedyarov’s words, 9
points containing all the elements of the future agreement are being
discussed during the negotiation process. The Azerbaijani FM also
stressed that “for the involvement of Karabakh into the negotiation
process the return of the Azeri community to NK is essential.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Three-day OSCE monitoring to be held at Armenian-Azeri border

THREE-DAY OSCE MONITORING TO BE HELD AT ARMENIAN-AZERI BORDER

PanArmenian News Network
July 18 2005

18.07.2005 03:11 — /PanARMENIAN.Net/ July 18-21 in the accord
with the mandate with the Personal Representative of the OSCE
Chairman-in-Office a recurrent monitoring will be held at the contact
line of the armed forces of Armenia and Nakhichevan. From the Azeri
side the monitoring will be held by field assistants of the Personal
Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Imre Palatinus and Peter
Key. Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Ambassador
Andrzej Kasprzyk with his field assistants Miroslav Vimetal and
Alexander Samarsky will conduct the monitoring from the Armenian side.

Revivals are out, cutting-edge in at midtown stage festival

Revivals are out, cutting-edge in at midtown stage festival

New York Daily News
July 18 2005

Theatergoers don’t have to wait until next month’s Fringe Festival to
see new shows on the fringe – such as a play in which a coat-check
girl has clairvoyant powers and a musical where a guardian angel
brings Princess Diana back to life.

Today the curtain raises on the Midtown International Theatre Festival,
which features an eclectic assortment of more than 50 original plays,
musicals and solo performances at five W. 36th St. spaces through
Aug. 7.

For Midtown producer John Chatterton, presenting more offbeat and
out-there fare has been a gradual process since the festival was
founded six years ago with only 19 shows.

“Where we used to do more Shaw and Shakespeare and other revivals,
there’s less and less of that now,” says Chatterton, publisher and
editor of online theater magazine OOBR (Off-Off Broadway Review).

“Our shows have become increasingly cutting-edge over the years,
and this year we only have one revival out of the 50 [works] we’re
presenting.”

The lone production with a pedigree is “It’s Only a Play,” a revival
of Terrence McNally’s biting satire of Broadway during the 1980s.

Other MITF shows generating a bit of buzz this year include “Charles
and Diana: The Musical,” a fantasy that has Princess Di getting a
second chance at life and love; “The Girls Who Wore Black,” based on
the poetry of such female Beat Generation writers as Diane di Prima,
Hettie Jones and Joyce Johnson; “21 Stories: A Broadway Tale,” a love
story about an English youth and a Texas woman who dream of being
Broadway stars, and “Good Opinions,” which deals with a coat-check
girl in a Manhattan restaurant who can foretell the reviews of a
powerful theater critic.

Among the standout solo shows are “on the Couch With Nora Armami.”
Armami, an Egyptian-Armenian-American actress who also starred in a
popular one-woman show at last year’s festival, returns with a humorous
take on her struggles to identify with her multicultural heritage.

In addition to these full productions, MITF is also presenting a
series of staged readings of nearly a dozen plays. MITF runs today
through Aug. 7 at Workshop Theaters, Where Eagles Dare Theaters and
Smash studios on W. 36th St. Tickets to all shows are $15 and $20.

For more info: or (212) 868-4444.

www.MidtownFestival.org

NATO: too much fuss and petty achievements

PRAVDA< Russia
July 18 2005

NATO: too much fuss and petty achievements
07/18/2005 10:26

Now it is becoming clear that cooperation between Russia and NATO in
the fight against terrorism is fruitless

North Atlantic Treaty Organization has to change its tactics
following the political demarche by the Shanghai Cooperation
Organization during the summit in the Kazakh capital Astana earlier
this July. The member states and observers of the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization supported Uzbekistan’s proposal and demanded
that NATO pull out its military bases from Central Asia. Moreover,
the Shanghai Cooperation Organization requested that NATO set a
deadline for the removal of troops. The statement actually threatens
the implementation of decisions taken at last year’s NATO summit in
Istanbul which declared a larger part of Central Asia (along with the
Caucasus) a zone of strategic interests of the Alliance.

NATO is likely to shift its efforts to the Caucasus. According to
vice president of the Academy of Geopolitical Studies Col. Gen.
Leonid Ivashov, NATO’s rapid deployment military installations will
be set up in Georgia and Armenia when the Russian military bases are
finally squeezed out of those countries. The installations will be
properly equipped and manned by personnel capable of conducting a
large-scale troop and equipment deployment within several hours. The
Alliance is trying to build a new bloc of states comprising Turkey,
Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Col. Gen. Ivashov believes that Azeri
President Ilham Aliev has come under pressure because the Americans
want his go-ahead on the lease of three air fields in Azerbaijan.

More importantly, NATO is going to focus on Ukraine whose political
elite have eyes for Europe. Back in 2002 Ukrainian Parliament passed
a bill allowing NATO to use the whole territory of Ukraine for
deploying its troops including units with heavy equipment. The NATO
Big Black Sea Zone program specifically says that naval bases,
onshore facilities etc. should be developed. Patriotism-conscious
Russian politicians and political scientists are very much concerned
about the above situation. They believe that Ukraine may end up
dismembered into three states at the very least should it continue
following the present political course. The borders of those states
would be defined by confrontation between the west and the east and
instability of the Crimea. “They can only allow parts of Ukraine to
join Europe if they ever agree to let it in,” has been saying Col.
Gen. Ivashov to his opponents. The Russian naval base on the Crimean
coast may be shut down due to the developments in Ukraine. Despite
the fact that the Russian Navy is to use the base up to 2017 in
compliance with the bilateral agreement, Ukraine will never integrate
into NATO as long as the Russian Black Sea Navy is based in Ukraine.

After the West was accused of instigating the “color revolutions” and
the recent demands by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization with
respect to the withdrawal of NATO military bases from Central Asia,
Russia tends to recall its previous experiences of dealing with NATO,
the experiences characterizing NATO as an inconsistent organization
which can not keep its promises. Russia insisted that the Russia-NATO
Basic Act should contain a clause effectively banning the deployment
of nuclear weapons in the newly integrated member states of the
Alliance. However, NATO’s stance on the issue eventually prevailed
and the clause vaguely stipulated something like “the parties have no
intentions.” Now it is becoming clear that cooperation between Russia
and NATO in the fight against terrorism is fruitless. “Can you show
me any bandit captured by a joint effort?” asks Col. Gen Ivashov.
“There is none and we should not expect any results since 85% of the
NATO activities boil down to “improving combat readiness, conducting
defensive and offensive operations on land and by air,” adds he.

Col. Gen. Ivashov believes that cooperation between Russia and NATO
is a waste of time.

The Alliance is accused of “concept aggressiveness.” Analysts cite
the NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer who made a statement
prior to his visit to Moscow in June this year. In the statement he
said that protection of democracy by taking appropriate steps
including military operations, should the latter be deemed necessary,
was the main objective of the Alliance. Analysts also call into
question the worthiness of joint military exercises. Historical
parallels are drawn yet again in proof of the point of view. The NATO
leadership was convincing the Russian government in 1998-1999 that
military exercises in the vicinity of Yugoslavia would not evolve
into hostilities. Eventually, the story unfolded in a different way.
The NATO forces were ordered to detect and destroy a terrorist
submarine during the military exercises code-named Baltops. Can you
imagine any other subs but the Russian ones that could be detected in
the Baltic Sea?

Incidentally, Russia is not taking part in the military exercises
Peace Shield 2005 that went under way yesterday in Ukraine. The first
stage of the exercises involves about 750 servicemen from 22
countries conducting computer-simulated combats based on a real
military and political situation in Iraq. The international
contingent will move from Kiev to the Crimea on July 25th. The
maritime stage of the exercises will take place from August 3rd to
August 13th.

At times the political orientation and scenario of Peace Shield
exercises were apparently anti-Russian. Here is an example of the
scenario. Riots break out in the Crimea and one of the countries
provides help to the Russian-speaking part of the population. It is
clear that Russia is the only country which could rise to the
occasion. The present exercises also include “missions relating to an
international peacekeeping operation aimed at making peace.” That is
possibly why Russia refused to take part in the exercises.

On the other hand, there are people in Russia who have a different
opinion on “alliance between Russia and the Alliance.” President of
the Institute of Strategic Analysis Alexander Konovalov believes that
the most terrible thing conceivable has happened to NATO. The
Alliance lost its mission and its enemy. These days NATO is on a
frantic search for new forms of identity. However, the Alliance is
not scoring great success in the fight against the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, drugs trafficking, and
illegal immigration. The U.S. does not conceal its discontent because
NATO is making too much fuss while making too little progress. Mr.
Konovalov is confident that the NATO member states are not ready to
join forces and defend the Baltic countries. Even though the
relocation of NATO military bases to Eastern Europe looks like a
clear threat to Russia, it is mostly a matter of cost effectiveness.
It is a lot cheaper to keep the bases in Poland and Bulgaria than in
Germany. Alexander Konovalov arrives at the conclusion that NATO
poses not threat to Russia.

It’s a game of musical chairs but played SoCal style

It’s a game of musical chairs but played SoCal style
By Rick Orlov, Columnist

Los Angeles daily News
July 18 2005

In the merry-go-round politics caused by term limits, an old-fashioned
political showdown has developed, with Los Angeles and Sacramento
forces at odds in a race for a San Fernando Valley seat in the
state Senate.

State Sen. Richard Alarcon is being forced from his 20th District
seat in 2006 and has announced plans to run for the 39th Assembly
District seat, which is being vacated by Assemblywoman Cindy Montanez,
so she can run for the Alarcon seat. She has been endorsed by Alarcon
and Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez.

Enter City Council President Alex Padilla, who is facing term limits
of his own in 2009.

While Padilla has not formally declared his intentions, he is close
to taking out papers to run for Alarcon’s Senate seat, too.

The Montanez forces do not want to face him in a head-on race, so
they have been trying to pressure Padilla to run for city controller
or any other office.

Padilla, however, has set his sights on the Senate, looking down the
road for a future run for statewide office.

Interestingly, Padilla scheduled an event Saturday — marking his
re-election to the council this year — with Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa
featured. Montanez, at the same time, scheduled an open house at her
San Fernando offices. The annual Lotus Festival and its boat races
have come to replace softball games as the new rivalry at City Hall,
and Councilman Eric Garcetti’s office has proven to be king of the
Echo Park lake.

For the second consecutive year, Garcetti’s team finished first in
the event, trumping teams from the office of Councilman Ed Reyes —
who entered two boats in the race — as well as teams from the offices
of Rep. Xavier Becerra and Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg.

The Goldberg team reported it came in last, amid complaints from the
assemblywoman that the event was overly competitive and that her boat
had been cut off by the Becerra team.

The contest has taken on so much interest that even Villaraigosa
attended this year’s race and said he plans to enter a boat next
year. As the City Council looks to its summer recess in late August,
foreign travel is dominating some council members’ agendas.

Garcetti said he was planning a trip to Armenia that is being arranged
through the Little Armenia community in his district.

His traveling partner could be Councilman Dennis Zine, who also
has been approached by officials from Beirut about establishing a
sister-city relationship with Los Angeles. Zine, who is of Lebanese
heritage, is said to be interested in promoting the relationship.

Los Angeles has 21 sister cities, ranging from Athens and Bombay to
Giza in Egypt and St. Petersburg in Russia. It also has sister cities
in such remote areas as Kauanas in Lithuania, and Lusaka in Zambia.

So far — and it has been only two weeks — the animal activists in
the city have given Villaraigosa a pass on personal protests at his
events and home.

Former Mayor James Hahn was nearly constantly dogged during his term
— including weekend protests in front of his San Pedro home — by
various organizations protesting delays in the city’s adoption of a
no-kill policy at its animal shelters.

No one knows how long the moratorium on Villaraigosa will last, but
it appears, through e-mails being sent out, that the patience in the
animal activist community is running thin.

During the recent mayoral election, Villaraigosa supported a no-kill
policy and promised a review of Animal Services Director Guerdon
Stuckey.

Activists now are bombarding the mayor’s office and reporters with
e-mails about problems they see and demanding that Stuckey be fired.

Aides to Villaraigosa said the mayor is continuing his review of
the agency.

Daily News, Staff Writer David Drucker contributed to this report.

–Boundary_(ID_/tpMbdoHB4Oj6LFr6/slQw)–

Dangerous, unrecognized countries? Let’s go!

Dangerous, unrecognized countries? Let’s go!
By JOHN DOYLE

Globe and Mail, Canada
July 18 2005

As an Irish ballad informs us with pith, “Everybody needs a break/climb
a mountain or jump in a lake.” It’s a song about summer holidays, which
people are kinda weird about. Some motor off to the cottage. Some
fly off to see the relatives in the old country. Others decide to
visit somewhere they’ve seen in a movie. The sister came over here to
bother me — and the brother. The mother and the da are, apparently,
going to Bucharest. Why? They saw it on TV and took a notion.

Some people are a tad wackier when it comes to vacations, though.
They’ll go to places that are remote and dangerous. If there are
warnings from the government and international organizations that the
place is hostile to outsiders, all the better. The ultimate list of
such places is covered in a new British series starting here tonight.

Holidays in the Danger Zone: Places That Don’t Exist (Newsworld,
8 p.m.) is outstanding television. That’s because Simon Reeve, the
host/reporter, is endlessly curious and incredibly brave.

When we last encountered Reeve he was showing us around “the Stans,”
countries such as Kazakhstan, that few outsiders visit. It was an
excellent series, exceptionally revealing of both the general and
specific.

Advertisements

Reeve is now one of the great TV figures. A smart and cheerful
Englishman, he’s a combination of Michael Palin and serious political
reporter. Before he started making these odd but fascinating TV
programs, he wrote one of the landmark books about al-Qaeda.

In this series he visits countries that don’t officially exist. Most
aren’t recognized by other countries or the United Nations and,
in many cases you won’t find the details on a map.

His first stop in the new series is Somaliland, which broke away from
Somalia few years ago. To get there, he had to go to Somalia first.
His time in Mogadishu is truly bizarre. He ambles around, surrounded
by hired thugs because that’s the only way to get a bit of peace in
Somalia. Even then, things are a bit tense. Amiable and oblivious to
the danger around him, though, Reeve visits the “tourist spots” —
those places where the real events depicted in the movie Black Hawk
Down took place. To get out of Somalia a person needs a passport. For
that, Reeve did business with the chap in charge of such matters,
a very frightening man known as Mr. Big Beard.

Meanwhile in Somaliland, the people are trying to create something
resembling a stable country. It’s as if all the sensible people fled
Somalia and tried to set up an alternative version. In fact they did,
tired of warlords and endless bloodshed. But nobody recognizes it as
a country so far. The United Nations gives it some money and that’s
about all the support it gets. Reeve wanders into a meeting of the
government of Somaliland. “What is your national budget?” he asks
of the Prime Minister. The man laughs. “Whatever we get,” he says.
Somaliland doesn’t officially exist, but it looks like a promising
place.

In the second episode, airing next week, Reeve visits Transdniestria.
It’s a wannabe country tucked between Moldova and Ukraine. The people
of Transdniestria would rather be closer to Ukraine and Russia,
since Moldova is considered the poorest country in Europe.

There, Reeve meets the President, who wants to get him drunk, and then
a group of men in a village who have sold their kidneys for cash. Once
in Transdniestria, Reeve finds a weird Soviet-style society. No other
country recognizes this little country, but it has its own currency,
postage stamps, government and president. Its economy seems to rest
on a bunch of enormous steel factories that were part of the Soviet
system. They function today, probably making armaments. Reeve traipses
around, like a slightly dotty tourist, and asks impertinent questions.

In later programs in the five-part series (continuing through Wednesday
and next week), Reeve visits Nagorno-Karabakh, South Ossetia and
Taiwan. It is all excellent television, the sort of hybrid journalism
that television does very well. If you want to use the series for
summer holiday suggestions, that’s entirely up to you.

Also airing tonight: Medium (CTV, 9 p.m., NBC, 10 p.m.) is a repeat,
but it is one of those episodes worth noting. In this one, Allison
(Patricia Arquette) has a dream about two boys racing a train. In the
dream, one boy disappears. Her search for the meaning of the dream
leads her to consult a professor who specializes in communicating
with the dead. Thus we get a double-whammy of paranormal shenanigans.
Having seen many of the new shows arriving this fall, I can tell
you that this double-whammy is just the start. The paranormal is the
coming thing. I can see it, and I’m no medium.

Arch of Triumph to be erected in Karabakh

TRIUMPHAL ARCH TO BE ERECTED IN KARABAKH

PanArmenian News Network
July 18 2005

18.07.2005 03:56

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Triumphal Arch, which will immortalize the victory
of the Karabakh and all Armenian people as well as the memory of those
killed in struggle for the independence of Karabakh may be erected in
NK. The initiative belongs to Vardkes and Alive Anivians, the American
couple of Armenian origin, who made the suggestion during the meeting
with NKR President Arkady Ghukasian. The Arch is supposed to be erected
at the Goris-Stepanakert highway to the east of the town of Shushi,
Mediamax agency reported.

Armenian journalists & diplomats played in draw

ARMENIAN JOURNALISTS AND DIPLOMATS PLAYED IN DRAW

PanArmenian News Network
July 18 2005

18.07.2005 03:47

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On the occasion of the 10-th anniversary of the
Yerevan Press Club the teams of journalists and diplomats (composed
of the members of RA Foreign Ministry and Embassies of some states)
played a friendly football match, IA Regnum reports. The status of
friendly match perfectly reflected on the outcome. The match ended
in a draw 3:3. The match proceeded in a tense and non-compromise
atmosphere. After the first period the journalist were leading 2:0,
however in the second period the diplomats activated and scored three
goals. As result the journalists launched a bitter attack against
the gates of the rivals. The efforts of the writing fraternity were
justified with the desirable goal at the last minute of the match.
After the match all the participants received prizes and presents. To
note, head of the Yerevan OSCE Office, Ambassador Vladimir Pryakhin
was among the honorary quests.