AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x109
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, June 30, 2006
AGBU SPEARHEADS FIRST OF ITS KIND EUROPEAN TRAINING SEMINAR FOR YOUNG
ARMENIANS
Investing in the next generation, AGBU broke symbolic ground in
Brussels, Belgium, with its first training and networking seminar for
European youth from April 29 to May 2, 2006, entitled “Project
Exchange and Development Seminar for Young European Armenians.”
Promoting the grassroots efforts of young Armenians, AGBU in
sponsorship with the Council of Europe welcomed 38 talented community
organizers from 14 European countries (Armenia, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the
Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom) to
participate in a unique peer-to-peer exchange within a dynamic,
facilitated learning environment.
With multiple presenters on hand to explore new ideas, information and
experiences, the seminar was kicked off by guest speaker Dr. Bernard
Coulie, President of Belgium’s University of Louvain. Placing the
project work of the young Armenians within a European context,
Prof. Coulie emphasized the shared Christian history between Armenians
and Europe, and the tried and tested ability of the Armenian culture
to absorb new influences while retaining its specific identity.
Offering numerous learning opportunities, the four-day exchange
included informative talks by leading European organizations AIESEC,
AEGEE (Association des Etats Généraux des Etudiants d’Europe), the
International Yehudi Menuhin Foundation and the European Commission
Youth Program; training in fundraising and project management;
roundtable workshops on international exchange, culture and
professional networking; and presentations by seminar participants on
their local projects.
Fostering fellowship and camaraderie, Europe-wide participants quickly
came to appreciate their shared experiences, and the challenges and
opportunities that unite them as young Armenians serving their local
communities and homeland. Through exposure to one another’s work,
participants enthusiastically engaged in discussions on ways to
collaborate on joint projects in the future.
“The AGBU seminar in Brussels has shown me an efficient way to bring
together young Armenian professionals and the potential of highly
motivated Armenians looking for an opportunity to serve their local
communities and Armenia,” said attendee Karen Navoyan, Co-Founder and
Co-President of Haik, an Armenian Students Association connecting 16
universities across Germany. “Furthermore, it has built a sphere for
potential collaboration on international projects. Knowing there are
other Armenians in Europe who are goal-oriented serving their
communities gives you motivation to continue your projects in your own
community. But the most important contribution of this seminar has
been the first step taken in creating a basis for a network between
Armenian young professionals in Europe.”
With an ongoing commitment towards continuing the exchange, various
follow-up measures have been implemented by AGBU, including the
maintenance of the project’s website () and
support of an online forum on openBC () for networking
and professional purposes. To participate, go to OpenBC, become a
member and join Groups/Community and social issues/Armenian
Professionals Online.
Among the various organizations represented at the seminar were:
All-Armenian Youth Foundation (); Armenian Culture
Association of Barcelona ([email protected]); AGBU: France
District (, ), London Chapter
(), Plovdiv Chapter ([email protected]), Sofia
Chapter () and Yerevan Office (); Armenian
Youth & Culture Committee, England (); Association
Culturelle Arménienne d’Aix-en-Provence, France
([email protected]); CCAF, Conseil de Coordination des
Organisations Arméniennes de France (); DA-Connexion
France (); Fondation Alliance Arménienne,
Switzerland (); Gladzor Armenian Students Association,
Netherlands (student.armeenseforum.nl/armv); Haik German-Armenian
Students Association ([email protected]); Inside Europe, Belgium
(); World Armenian Youth Network (WostAyn)
(); and the Youth Parliament of Armenia
().
For more information on the seminar, please visit the AGBU Project
Exchange and Development Seminar web site ().
Established in 1906, the Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) is
the world’s largest Armenian non-profit organization. Headquartered in
New York City with an annual budget of $34 million, AGBU preserves and
promotes the Armenian identity and heritage through educational,
cultural and humanitarian programs, annually serving some 400,000
Armenians in 35 countries.
For more information on AGBU, please visit
State Dept. regular news briefing
CQ Transcriptions
Congressional Quarterly
June 30 2006
STATE DEPARTMENT REGULAR NEWS BRIEFING
JUNE 30, 2006
SPEAKER: J. ADAM ERELI, STATE DEPARTMENT DEPUTY SPOKESMAN
[parts omitted]
QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE) Why are DOS officials prohibited to use the
word, quote/unquote, “genocide” and speak truthfully when discussing
the Armenian genocide as happened yesterday in the Congress, during
the testimony of a new U.S. ambassador to Armenia?
Senator Norm Coleman, Republican from Minnesota, stated, quote, “I am
not sure how we can continue to have ambassador to Armenia who can be
effective unless they give recognition to the genocide,” end quote.
And the veteran Senator Joseph Biden against Senate approval of new
ambassador until the Department of State responds to questions on
Ambassador Evans’ recall.
ERELI: And what’s the question?
QUESTION: The question: Any comment, since you know very, very well
the reason?
ERELI: I don’t have any comment.
I think that as far as the senator’s questions go, we will respond as
we normally do, in formal channels to the members of Congress should
they ask for that.
And as far as our stand on this issue, there’s no change. And if
you’d like a restatement of it, I’d refer you to the record.
QUESTION: Why any U.S. ambassador to Israel would have not had
credibility if refused to talk about the Holocaust by then-Nazi
German and in the case of Armenia, it’s happened exactly the
opposite?
ERELI: I reject the premise of the question.
QUESTION: Why?
ERELI: Because I think it’s fallacious.
QUESTION: And one more.
May we have a copy of the Department of State’s, quote/unquote,
“background papers” on the Armenian’s genocide that Ambassador
Hoagland stated the other day he studied in preparation for his
possible post to Armenia?
ERELI: No, I think that what is available in the public record is
what we can provide.
From: Baghdasarian
ASBAREZ Online [06-30-2006]
ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
06/30/2006
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ. COM
1) Senators Continue to Press Ambassador Designate to Armenia
2) Karabakh Leadership Position Remains Unchanged
3) G8 Expresses Support For OSCE Peace Efforts
4) Senate Aid Panel Votes Sharp Cut in Aid to Armenia
5) ACF Glendale Raises $500,00 For Community Youth Center
6) Karekin II Faces Prosecution in Turkey
7) Stupid Supremes Support Selection Again
8) Legislation Opening California Courts To Recover Genocide Era Deposits
Headed to State Assembly
9) ANCA Leadership Conference to Gather Activists This September
1) Senators Continue to Press Ambassador Designate to Armenia
Senate defers action on Armenian Ambassador-Designate; Quickly confirms
ambassadors to Switzerland and Ireland
WASHINGTONSenate Foreign Relations Committee members John Kerry (D-Mass.),
Paul Sarbanes (D-Md.), Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.)
have
each submitted a series detailed written questions to US Ambassador to Armenia
Designate Richard Hoagland, calling upon him to clarify the specific
instructions he has received from the State Department concerning the exact
contours of the State Department's policy on the Armenian genocide, reported
the Armenian National Committee.
These questions follow this past Wednesday's contentious Senate confirmation
hearing for Ambassador-Designate Hoagland, during which George Allen (R-Va.),
Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.), and Paul Sarbanes (D-Md.) pressed the nominee for
an explanation of the State Department's guidance regarding the use of the
word
"genocide" to properly characterize this crime against humanity. Resorting to
the use of evasions and euphemisms, the Ambassador-Designate avoided giving
direct answers to any of the questions raised at the hearing.
Ambassador-Designate Hoagland's June 28th appearance before the Foreign
Relations Committee was alongside nominees for the US ambassadorships to
Ireland and Switzerland. These latter two, who encountered no difficulties
during their questioning at the hearing, were rapidly approved at the
Committee
level and approved overwhelmingly by the full Senate. In contrast, the
Committee deferred action on confirming a new ambassador to Armenia.
"Seven of the eighteen members of the Foreign Relations Committee - over one
third of this influential panel - are already on record raising serious
concerns about confirming a new ambassador to Yerevan before receiving a full,
open, and official explanation of the circumstances surrounding the recall of
our current ambassador, the instructions given to our prospective ambassador,
and more broadly - the exact nature of our government's policy on the
Armenian
Genocide," said ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian. "In light of the seriousness of
these issues - and the lack of responsiveness from the Administration - we
were
gratified that both the Committee and the full Senate have wisely delayed
action on the new ambassador to Yerevan until these fundamental questions have
been answered."
In the days leading up to the confirmation hearing, Senate Foreign Relations
Committee Ranking Democrat Joseph Biden (D-Del.) asked Secretary Condoleezza
Rice for a thorough explanation of the circumstances of the premature
recall of
US Ambassador to Armenia John Marshall Evans over his public comments
affirming
the Armenian genocide. In his June 23rd letter to Secretary Rice, Sen. Biden
stated that he would "not be prepared to move forward with any Senate action
that would prematurely end his [Amb. Evans'] tenure in Yerevan" until a series
of questions surrounding the Evans dismissal had been answered.
Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) has submitted his own concerns to Secretary Rice,
stating that he is "interested to learn more about the circumstances that lead
to his [Evans] departure," noting that "an effort, intended to destroy in
whole
or in part a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, clearly
constitutes
an act of genocide."
Last week, House Armenian Genocide Resolution lead sponsors George Radanovich
(R-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) joined with Congressional Armenian
Caucus
Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg (R-Mich) in urging
Secretary
Rice to reconsider replacing Amb. Evans, noting that "allowing John Evans to
continue as Ambassador to Armenia sends a strong message on the necessity of
Turkish recognition, and will be an important step on establishing the US
position on the Armenian genocide."
Over the past several months, scores of Senate and House Members have
directed
questions to State Department officials, calling for answers surrounding the
controversial firing of Amb. Evans. The Administration's responses have been
largely perfunctory, citing that Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the
President, but giving no clear insight into State Department's decision to
dismiss the career diplomat.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee members George Allen (R-VA) and Norm
Coleman (R-MN) bombarded US Ambassador to Armenia Designate Richard Hoagland
with questions about official US complicity in Turkey's campaign of Genocide
denial, questioning him, during his confirmation hearing, regarding his
ability
to effectively represent the United States in Armenia without properly
recognizing the Armenian genocide.
In the days leading up to Wednesday's hearing, the Committee's Ranking
Democrat, Joseph Biden (D-Del.), in a strongly worded letter, demanded that
the
Secretary of State answers questions concerning the recall of the current US
Ambassador to Armenia John Evans, before he could support the confirmation of
his replacement.
At the hearing, Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-Md.), joined with Senators Coleman
and Allen in sharply criticizing the Administration's refusal to speak
truthfully on the Armenian genocide. Senator Boxer, who was unable to attend
the hearing, submitted written questions to Amb. Hoagland.
The hearing was marked by repeated calls upon Amb. Hoagland to clarify the
State Department's policy on the Armenian genocide. If approved, he will
replace the current US ambassador to Armenia, John Marshall Evans, who - amid
great controversy - has been recalled over his truthful description of the
Armenian genocide in February of 2005.
"We appreciate the leadership of Senators Allen, Coleman and Sarbanes in
pressing hard for a detailed explanation of the US policy on the Armenian
genocide - and commend Senator Biden for his principled demand that the Senate
receive clear answers on this issue from the State Department before moving
ahead with the nomination of a new envoy to Yerevan," said ANCA Chairman Ken
Hachikian. "We were deeply disappointed that, in response to these legitimate
inquiries, Ambassador-designate Hoagland - apparently at the direction of his
superiors in the State Department limited his responses to a series of
unresponsive evasions and euphemisms intended to obscure - not explain -
the US
policy on the Armenian genocide."
"We have said from the start - and believe even more firmly today - that the
US Senate cannot, in good conscience, approve the nomination of a new
ambassador to Armenia until the circumstances of the current envoy's
controversial firing - including a thorough description of the US policy on
the
Armenian genocide are fully, officially and openly explained to Congress and
the American people," said Hachikian.
Dodging the Armenian Genocide
In his opening remarks, Senator Allen, who chaired the confirmation hearing,
made specific reference to the Bush Administration's decision to recall US
Ambassador to Armenia John Marshall Evans for referring to the deportation and
death of 1.5 million Armenians in 1915 as a clear instance of "genocide."
"Some
have expressed concern that Ambassador Evans has been relieved of his
duties as
a result of references to the Armenian genocide," stated Sen. Allen.
"I do not know this to be true, but will say that many of my colleagues and I
refer to the tragic events of 1915 as genocide and have strongly encouraged
the
President to do so as well. I hope that in the future the Administration will
recognize this terrible event for what it was genocide."
The Virginia Senator - and potential 2008 Presidential candidate - then went
on to question Amb. Hoagland about the instructions he has received about
discussing the Armenian genocide, as well as the instructions he intends to
issue to his Embassy staff on this matter. In response, Amb. Hoagland stated
that, "the President has said, this is a tragedy for all humanity and one that
the world must never forget." He went on to note that he had not received "any
kind of written instruction about this. I simply studied the policy, I studied
the background papers on the policy, I know the policy and my
responsibility is
to support the president."
Amb. Hoagland noted on a number of occasions during the hearing that, as a
Foreign Service officer who has dealt with the Caucasus, he has visited the
memorial to victims in Armenia in Yerevan, and would do so again, should he be
confirmed. He added, however, that he was against "getting stuck in the past"
and wanted to focus on "living in the future."
Minnesota Senator Norm Coleman noted that, "you can't look to the future if
you deny your past." Sen. Coleman was relentless but respectful in his
questioning, stating that, "the State Department has put you in a difficult
position. It is almost absurd for you to sit here and you can't utter the word
'genocide.' The President's statement that he utters every year is a
description of genocide. One of the things I was proud about the State
Department is when we talk about the genocide in Sudan it's genocide what's
happening in Darfur."
Senator Coleman raised the 2000 statement by then Governor George Bush that,
"Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies comprehension,"
asking Amb. Hoagland, "do you agree or disagree with that statement." Amb.
Hoagland avoided directly answering the question, noting instead: "I fully
agree that events occurred in 1915 and following were of historic proportion.
As I said, they were documented, they were horrifying. As we heard from
Senator Sarbanes earlier on 'hundreds of valleys devastated,' 'no family
untouched'. It was historic, it was a tragedy."
When asked by Senator Coleman why he thought the State Department barred the
use of the term "Armenian genocide," Amb. Hoagland dodged the question,
stating: "I am very much encouraged by the fact that there are senior
officials
in Yerevan and Ankara and elsewhere who do like to bring closure to that
period
of history. They are looking for new ways of doing it. There are talks of
commissions the truth and reconciliation commission concept is being explored
in quiet conversations. If we could I would very much like to meet with senior
officials in Ankara and Baku because I think that could be helpful - it would
help me understand better how to play a role of reconciliatory and a
peacemaking role."
In his comments, Senator Coleman stressed the theme that a US Ambassador to
Armenia who does not recognize the Armenian genocide lacks credibility. He
noted that, "I am of the Jewish faith. I cannot imagine an Ambassador to
Israel being effective without talking about the Holocaust. I am not sure how
we can continue to have Ambassadors to Armenia who can be effective, unless
they give
recognition to the Genocide."
Senator Sarbanes, in his opening remarks, expressed "regret that we were
called to hold this hearing today, in part to replace a career Ambassador
prior
to the completion of a three year tour of duty. We would not be in this
situation, if the Administration would simply acknowledge a plain historical
truth that 91 years ago, the world witnessed the first Genocide of the 21st
century the Armenian genocide." Sen. Sarbanes spoke eloquently about the US
Foreign service officers who witnessed the Armenian genocide in 1915, and
whose
observations remain a permanent part of the US archives.
Senator Barbara Boxer, who was not able to attend the hearing, submitted
remarks and detailed written questions to Amb. Hoagland. Noting Amb. Evans'
statement in February 2005, properly characterizing the Armenian genocide as
"genocide," Sen. Boxer stated, "I agree with Ambassador Evans' statement. Not
only should we not play word games with a matter as serious as genocide, we
should also not play political games with issues of genocide."
The Senator went on to express concern "that the controversy surrounding
Ambassador Evans will needlessly harm US-Armenian relations. I understand that
there are protests in front of the US Embassy in Yerevan today over the recall
of Ambassador of Evans. How would you respond to this concern?"
Sen. Boxer's reference was to a candle-light vigil held Wednesday in Yerevan
by hundreds of human rights activists during the Senate confirmation hearing,
as part of the "Yellow Ribbon Campaign" protesting the firing the Amb. Evans.
On April 24th, tens of thousands had tied yellow ribbons in solidarity with
the
US Ambassador, who had stood with the Armenian people in honoring the victims
and survivors of the Armenian genocide.
Regional Integration And Military Aid Parity
In response to questions on the Turkish and Azerbaijani blockades of Armenia
and the proposed Kars, Tbilisi, Baku railroad, Amb. Hoagland was adamant about
the Administration's decision not to fund any project that would hinder
regional integration and cooperation. When asked about efforts to maintain
military aid parity to Armenia and Azerbaijan, Amb. Hoagland would not commit
to equal allocations of military aid to both countries. Sen. Allen reminded
the
nominee that the Senate plays a central role in ensuring military aid parity
and that he would continue to work hard to ensure the aid balance is
maintained.
Sen. Biden Asks Secretary Rice For Answers on Amb. Evans Recall
Just days before the Senate confirmation hearing, Foreign Relations Committee
Ranking Democrat Joe Biden (D-DE) expressed concern to Secretary Condoleezza
Rice regarding the circumstances surrounding the recall of Amb. Evans, noting
that he is "not prepared to move forward on Senate action" on his replacement,
until several key questions are answered.
In his June 23rd letter to Secretary Rice, Sen. Biden noted that "to
punish an
American official for correctly describing any historical event raise serious
questions about the United States' commitment to the values of transparency
and
honesty." The letter went on to note that, "in this instance, the allegation
that the Department would retaliate against an official whose only apparent
offense was discussing an act of genocide with American citizens also damages
our country's reputation for upholding human rights and democratic values."
Senator Biden posed four questions to the State Department, including one
which asks: "If it is in fact the policy of the United States not to
characterize the systematic killing of 1.5 million Armenians as genocide,
please explain why these events do not meet any of the five definitions in the
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide." The
State Department response, written by Assistant Secretary of Legislative
Affairs Jeffrey Bergner, effectively avoided providing a meaningful
response to
Senator Biden's questions.
Sen. Allen Calls on Ambassador-Designate to Respect Armenians
In his closing comments, Senator Allen urged Ambassador-designate Hoagland
"to
be respectful to Armenian Americans and also to Armenians, recognizing their
heritage, their history, their sensitivities."
The Scripps-Howard News Service, ran a story Wednesday "Ambassador - to-be
dodges Armenian genocide question," about Amb. Hoagland's confirmation
hearing.
The first line of the story reads: "America's next ambassador to Armenia is a
verbal gymnast. He has to be, to keep his job."
2) Karabakh Leadership Position Remains Unchanged
STEPANAKERT (RFE/RL)A senior Nagorno-Karabakh official reaffirmed on Thursday
the Stepanakert government's unhappiness with the existing international plan
to end the Armenian-Azerbaijani dispute and said the international mediators
are also to blame for the deadlocked peace process.
"Failure to include important provisions into the proposals [made by the OSCE
Minsk Group] was to inevitably lead to a fiasco. Therefore their avoidance of
responsibility is not justified," Arman Melikian, a top aide to Karabakh
leader
Arkady Ghukasian, told RFE/RL.
He was commenting on a statement by the American, French and Russian
co-chairs
of the Minsk Group which disclosed the main elements of a framework peace
agreement considered by Armenia and Azerbaijan. The statement, made public on
Wednesday, warned that by failing to sign that agreement the conflicting
parties would miss a unique opportunity to resolve the Karabakh dispute.
At the heart of the Minsk Group plan is the idea of determining Karabakh's
status in a referendum to be held years after the liberation of most
Armenian-occupied territories in Azerbaijan and other confidence-building
measures. Melikian reiterated that the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic
(NKR) has serious misgivings about the idea not least because the proposed
vote
would also involve Karabakh's former Azerbaijani minority that fled the region
during the war. He complained that the peace proposals do not allow for the
return of Armenians displaced by the conflict.
"The current negotiating process does not seem to be aimed at finding a final
and lasting solution," claimed Melikian.
The Karabakh official also dismissed the mediators' assurances that they have
done their best to broker a peaceful settlement and that the onus is on the
two
sides to hammer out mutual compromise. "In essence, the co-chairs are
trying to
blame the lack of results in the negotiating process on the parties, Armenia
and Azerbaijan," he said. "They are taking a neutral stance and saying that
the
presidents are to blame for their failure to reach agreement."
The remarks contrast with the position of official Yerevan which finds the
proposed Karabakh deal largely acceptable. "Armenia finds that the basic
principles, overall, on the table today remain a serious basis for continuing
negotiations," the Foreign Ministry said on Monday.
The Minsk Group was also essentially endorsed on Thursday by Armenian
Revolutionary Federation Bureau member Vahan Hovannesian. "Nobody, including
the mediators, denies that this is only a basis for further
clarifications," he
told RFE/RL. "We will never try to prevent our authorities from reaching
such a
framework agreement."
"But when it comes to working out details of that framework agreement, there
will certainly be debates, both here and in Azerbaijan," added the deputy
speaker of the Armenian parliament.
Hovannesian also praised the mediators for finally disclosing the essence of
what they believe is the optimal peace formula. He suggested that ordinary
Azerbaijanis will now see the huge gap between President Ilham Aliyev's public
threats to win back Karabakh by force and his apparent stated readiness to let
the Karabakh Armenians decide their status.
3) G8 Expresses Support For OSCE Peace Efforts
YEREVAN (YERKIR)In a statement issued Friday, the foreign ministers of the G8
countries expressed support for the OSCE Minsk Group Karabakh peace efforts,
announced the chairman of the G8 Summit currently underway in Moscow.
"We emphasize the need to coordinate the fundamental principles of the
plan as
soon as possible, in order to resolve the conflict in 2006," the announcement
highlighted.
"We call on Azerbaijan and Armenia to demonstrate political will and reach an
agreement during the current year and prepare the publics for peace but not
for
war," the document stressed.
4) Senate Aid Panel Votes Sharp Cut in Aid to Armenia
Proposes $5 Million for Nagorno Karabakh; Allocates Equal Amounts of Foreign
Military Financing to Armenia and Azerbaijan
WASHINGTONIn a departure from its traditional support for a robust US
assistance package for Armenia, the Senate Appropriations Committee Thursday
voted to dramatically reduce aid to Armenia, reported the Armenian National
Committee of America.
Early reports from Capitol Hill indicate that the Senate Appropriations
Committee has approved a $50 million economic aid package for Armenia as part
of its fiscal year 2007 aid bill. This allocation was broken down into $34.2
million for Freedom Support Act aid, $9.96 million for the Democracy Fund and
$5.8 million for the Child Survival Health Programs Fund. An additional $1.8
million was allocated for Peace Corps programs in Armenia. The panel's
proposal
is $25 million less than the actual allocations for Armenia over the past
several years.
In a positive development, the Senate panel approved $5 million for
humanitarian and relief assistance for Nagorno Karabakh, a $2 million increase
over the fiscal year 2006 allocation of $3 million. The panel also voted to
recommend equal amounts of US Foreign Military Financing (FMF) to Armenia and
Azerbaijan, with each appropriated $3.5 million. The panel did not clarify,
however, whether they intended this parity to extend to the International
Military Education and Training (IMET) and
Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NDAR) funds.
"We are troubled by the retreat of Senate appropriators from their
long-standing commitment to the US aid program for Armenia and Nagorno
Karabakh
- all the more so given Armenia's impressive domestic progress, robust and
expanding bilateral relations with the United States, peacekeeping support in
Iraq and Kosovo, cooperation in settling the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, and on
other pressing regional and security concerns," said ANCA Executive Director
Aram Hamparian. "We look forward to working with appropriators in both houses
of Congress to restore aid to at least last year's level."
The Senate Appropriations Committee's decision stands in contrast to the
House
vote earlier this month, which allocated $62 million in US economic aid for
Armenia. Over the course of the past decade, the Senate has consistently
proposed higher levels of aid for Armenia than the House.
The full Senate is expected to vote on the fiscal year 2007 foreign aid bill
following its return from the July 4th Congressional recess, after which House
and Senate appropriators will hold a conference to work out differences
between
their two bills.
In March of this year, the Millennium Challenge Corporation a newly
established, performance-based foreign aid program approved a five-year, $235
million assistance package to build roads and irrigation systems in Armenia's
rural regions.
5) ACF Glendale Raises $500,00 For Community Youth Center
GLENDALEDuring a gala banquet on June 10 at the Glendale Hilton Hotel,
$500,000
was raised by the Glendale chapter of the Armenian Cultural Foundation for the
construction of its Community Youth Center.
More than 450 community members attended the event, among them Western
Prelate
Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian, Armenian Revolutionary Federation Bureau
member Dr. Viken Hovsepian, members of the ARF Western Region Central
Committee, Glendale City Council members, the City Manager and representatives
from the Glendale Police Department, as well as representatives of several
city
educational and civic departments, the center's benefactor Dr. Alber
Karamanoukian and members of several organizations in Glendale.
Masters of Ceremony, Glendale ANC Director Alina Azizian and Glendale City
Clerk Ardashes Kassakhian welcomed the guests and invited Archbishop
Mardirossian to present the invocation. In his remarks, the Prelate urged the
community members to support the efforts of the Glendale ACF chapter and
highlighted the importance of a youth center in the community. He recalled
that
the groundbreaking and the blessing of the center was conducted by His
Holiness
Aram I, Catholicos of the Holy See of Cilicia.
In his remarks, Glendale ACF chairman Nazareth Apanian explained that the
needs of the community propelled the organization to initiate this worthwhile
project.
"Until the completion of the Glendale ACF Community Youth Center, fundraising
will be our priority," stressed Apanian who explained that the center has an
estimated price tag of $2.5 million and the assistance and support of each
community member is imperative.
"Let us make this center the pride of this community and center for all its
members," proclaimed Apanian.
The keynote speakers of the eveningGlendale High School Principal Kathy
Fundukian, St. Mary's Armenian Church Pastor Rev. Vasken Atmajian and Glendale
Police Captain Ray Edeyeach echoed the need for a community youth center and
expressed support for this project, pledging their individual assistance in
their respective spheres of influence.
A 15-minute video screening presented a three dimensional view of the
center's
exterior and interior facilities.
The Armenia and American national anthems were performed by Anahid Nersesian,
while she and Razmig Mansourian provided the entertainment for the evening. A
special presentation was also staged by the Armenian Relief Society Glendale
chapter Saturday School students.
6) Karekin II Faces Prosecution in Turkey
ISTANBUL (RFE/RL)Turkish prosecutors have launched a criminal investigation
into His Holiness Catholicos Karekin II's calls for Turkey to recognize the
1915 mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide, it emerged
on Thursday.
Ending a five-day visit to Istanbul on Sunday, the head of the Catholicos of
All Armenians said the Armenian genocide is a fact that can not be disputed by
the Turkish government and scholars. "For our people, the Genocide is not a
matter for research it is a reality of fact that happened, which must be
recognized," he told a news conference there. "That (recognition) is
nContinued
on page 11aturally the desired option, but a negative position can also be
taken on this issue."
The Turkish Cihan news agency reported that the prosecutor's office in
Istanbul believes that Karekin II thereby "denigrated Turkishness" and are
considering bringing relevant criminal charges against him. It said the
inquiry
was launched after a written complaint lodged by an association of Turkish
nationalist lawyers.
Members of the association were reportedly among a small number of people who
staged daily protests last week against Karekin II's presence in Istanbul.
Karekin II would be prosecuted, in absentia, under a highly controversial
article of the Turkish criminal code that has already been applied against
writer Orhan Pamuk and other prominent Turkish intellectuals who have
questioned official Ankara's vehement denial of the genocide. The European
Union, which has condemned the high-profile case against Pamuk, is pushing for
the abolition of the clause.
Karekin II arrived in Turkey on June 20 at the invitation of the
Istanbul-based Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I and the spiritual leader of
the local Armenian community, Patriarch Mesrob II. Turkish media quoted the
latter as openly disavowing the Armenian pontiff's genocide remarks and saying
that highly sensitive issue must be dealt with by historians only.
During his Instanbul news conference Karekin II also welcomed the fact that
the genocide issue is no longer a taboo in Turkey. "We are satisfied to see
that in the life of Turkish society, within democratization processes, people
are speaking and reflecting on the issue of the Genocide during the First
World
War to a certain extent," he said.
7) Stupid Supremes Support Selection Again
Enough's enough. Thirty years ago, the Supreme Court's decision in 1976
Buckley vs. Vallejo set the stage for the moneyed class being able to pre
SELECT who might eventually become a candidate for office be s/he Democrat or
Republican. In this decision the Court allowed restrictions on how much a
citizen could give a candidate for elective office, but not on how much a
candidate could spend.
Five years ago, the Supreme Court SELECTED the current resident of the White
House as president. It did so by halting a recount of the ballots in Florida
that would have given the victory to the other candidate, not their guy.
A few days ago, they reconfirmed their thirty-year-old SELECTION position.
Maybe it's time to have a new condition put on Supreme Court membership. You
know, just as we have re-licensing requirements to drive after a certain age.
It seems the nine current members, or at least the six who voted the wrong
way,
can't even differentiate their own sensory inputs.
I'm referring to the recent Randall vs. Sorrell case about which the US
Supreme Court just handed down its decision. These guys think money is
speech. That's what they said. Well, let me help them a bit. Money is a
thing. Sure it's becoming more ephemeral by becoming ever more electronified,
but in the real world it is tangible. We usually associate it with our sense
of touch. It is property, something we own. On the other hand, speech
(unrendered into writing, in its "pure" form) is a thing of the mouth and
ears,
not hands. It is a creature of conscience and human rights.
In the US, one is green (mostly, with some red thrown in lately) and often
smells bad. The other is colorless and odorless (bad-breath notwithstanding).
Hey wait that's it, the six supremes are color blind- an affliction of the
eyes
that impacts ability to see green and red! Or maybe the scent of money is
driving them to insanity through greed. In either, just like dogs. Maybe
that's why they're barking up the wrong tree of equating money to speech in
their rationale for disallowing Vermont to implement its new law setting
spending limits on candidates for state office. Imagine, having an election
where the power of money CAN'T buy a victory. Where money can't squelch
truth,
issues, and ideas. Where money is secondary to the power of the people those
supporting a candidate who walk precincts or call voters or stuff envelopes.
Yeah, boy, that would sure stink, we'd have a democracy, not a moneycracy.
Those idiotic ideologues can't even see their way clear to finding an
overwhelming public benefit to removing the corrupting power of money from our
electoral system. In case anyone has any doubts about the screwed-up
money-addled priorities of this court, consider this. It also ruled that
Texas' mid-census redistricting was also acceptable. What did it take to pull
that off? Lots of money, funneled by FORMER congressman Tom Delay through at
best questionable means that's part of the wheeling-and-dealing that's now
gotten him indicted.
So what's the solution? How can the power of money ever be
counterbalanced by
people? In California, we'll have to elect the Democrat, Phil Angelides, for
Governor. The Assembly and State Senate will remain under Democratic control,
there's no doubt of it. Then, we'll do a mid-census redistricting to reduce
Republicans to half the seats they hold now, in Congress and in the state
legislature. Certainly there'll be a court challenge by California's crybaby
Republicans. It might even make its way to the illustrious supremes. Then
we'll see how true they remain to their "principles," or how fast they show
their partisan colors.
8) Legislation Opening California Courts To Recover Genocide Era Deposits
Headed to State Assembly
SACRAMENTO The California State Assembly Judiciary Committee passed
legislation
on June 27 that would grant legal rights to Armenian Genocide survivors and
their heirs to recover bank deposits wrongfully withheld since the Armenian
Genocide, by giving California courts jurisdiction over banks operating in the
Ottoman Empire. The bill, SB 1524, the "Armenian Genocide Bank and Looted
Assets Recovery Act," involves the recovery of funds from commercial entities
operating in the region at the time.
Testifying in support of SB 1524 at Tuesday's hearing, Armenian National
Committee Western Region (ANCA-WR) Board of Directors member Souzi
ZerounianKhanzadian told committee members that the reclamation of the assets
can never serve as compensation for the atrocities endured during the Armenian
Genocide. "It is simply a matter of justice exacted against those banks that
took advantage of the genocide to profiteer in the midst and aftermath of
genocide. A number of these banks continue to do business in California today
either directly or through subsidiaries, therefore we ask you to adopt SB 1524
to help ensure this small measure of justice," ZerounianKhanzadian stressed.
The bill passed the Assembly Judiciary Committee with a vote of 6-1 and is
expected to go to the floor of the Assembly for vote on August 7, 2006 before
going to the Governor. The State Senate has already passed the bill, which is
authored by Senators Jackie Kanchelian-Speier and Charles "Chuck" Poochigian,
and sponsored by ANCA-WR.
The original Speier-Poochigian bill has been revised, however, due to a
hostile amendment that was introduced and accepted during its hearing in the
Senate Judiciary Committee on May 9. That amendment binds SB 1765, a bill
entitling lawsuits to be filed for wrongfully repatriated Mexican Americans
during the 1930s, to SB 1524.
Commenting on the dissimilarities of the two bills, ZerounianKhanzadian said
that while the ANCA firmly believes in correcting all historic wrongs, the two
distinct pieces of legislation are unreasonably and unfairly joined in fate,
making the passage of one contingent on the other.
"While these two pieces of legislation are both very significant, they must
nevertheless be judged on their individual merits. They not only address acts
that occurred separately, they also involve different fiscal impacts on the
state," she added.
With an almost 1,000,000 strong Armenian community, California has a public
policy interest in protecting the rights of its Armenian American
constituency,
asserted ZerounianKhanzadian. "Almost every one of these individuals was
impacted by the genocide. For many, their very presence in California is a
direct result of the Armenian Genocide. They found a haven in California
where
they could rebuild their lives after escaping utter turmoil. These survivors
have established their roots in and contributed to the growth of this great
state. These outstanding and ongoing grievances must be addressed."
9) ANCA Leadership Conference to Gather Activists This September
--Practical Training to Advance The Armenian Cause
WASHINGTONA broad cross-section of Armenian Americans - from long-time
veterans to first-time activists - will gather in Washington, DC between
September 14th and 17th for the Armenian National Committee of America's
(ANCA)
2006 Leadership Conference.
The conference, titled, "Grassroots Makes the Difference," will empower
activists to serve as energetic and effective ambassadors for the Armenian
Cause.
Over the course of the three-day program, presentations, workshops, and
practical training sessions will feature unique opportunities to:
-Network with national, regional, and local ANCA leaders, as well as with
activists from across the United States, and meet with officials from the
Administration and Congress.
-Explore exciting new opportunities - using cutting-edge technology and other
innovative techniques - to advance the Armenian American advocacy agenda.
-Learn effective ways to involve new activists, energize existing advocates,
improve cooperation with community organizations, and mobilize your local
grassroots base.
-Develop simple and effective methods to influence the media - locally and
nationally - by correcting mistaken reporting, responding to media bias, and
promoting positive coverage of Armenian issues.
-Share insights, experiences, and suggestions with old and new friends and
colleagues from across the United States.
-Engage with officials from the Administration and Congress, gaining special
insights into the US-Armenia bilateral relationship, Armenian genocide
recognition efforts, the Nagorno Karabagh peace process, and the impact of
Armenian American participation in the political process.
"The power, respect, and influence we enjoy in Washington, DC is earned every
day by ANCA activists working in their local communities across the United
States," said ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian. "Our Leadership Conference in
Washington, DC - a truly unique learning and team-building experience - will
provide these activists the tools they need to return home as even more
effective ambassadors for the Armenian Cause."
The conference, organized by the ANCA National headquarters, in coordination
with the Eastern and Western Regional offices and local chapters, will be held
at the Embassy Suites Hotel, at 900 10th Street, NW, in Washington DC.
To request information or to register for the conference, please contact the
ANCA Washington office at (202) 775-1918 or by email at [email protected].
All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2006 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.
ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.
ANCA: Senate Delays Confirm. Vote on Armenia Ambassador Designate
Armenian National Committee of America
1711 N Street NW
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Fax: (202) 775-5648
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet:
PRESS RELEASE
June 30, 2006
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918
SENATE DELAYS CONFIRMATION VOTE
ON ARMENIAN AMBASSADOR-DESIGNATE
— Seven Members of the Foreign Relations
Committee Press the Administration to
Explain its Policy on the Armenian Genocide
WASHINGTON, DC – In the wake of this past Wednesday’s contentious
Senate Foreign Relations Committee nomination hearing for
Ambassador to Armenia Designate Richard Hoagland, panel members
John Kerry (D-MA), Paul Sarbanes (D-MD), Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), and
Barbara Boxer (D-CA) have each submitted a series of detailed
written questions asking the nominee to explain the guidance he has
received from the State Department concerning its policy on the
Armenian Genocide, reported the Armenian National Committee (ANCA).
Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT) also sent a letter of inquiry this
week concerning the recall of the current U.S. Ambassador to
Armenia John Evans following his statements affirming the Armenian
Genocide.
During the June 28th nomination hearing, Sen. George Allen (R-VA),
Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN), and Sen. Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) pressed the
nominee for an explanation of the State Department’s guidance
regarding the use of the word “genocide” to properly characterize
this crime against humanity. Senators Allen and Coleman peppered
the nominee with numerous questions and expressed frustration as
the Ambassador-Designate avoided giving direct answers to any of
the questions, resorting to the use of euphemisms.
Ambassador-Designate Hoagland’s June 28th appearance before the
Foreign Relations Committee was alongside nominees for the U.S.
ambassadorships to Ireland and Switzerland, who were subsequently
approved by the Committee and then the full Senate on June 29th.
In contrast, the Committee deferred action on confirming the
proposed new ambassador to Armenia.
“Seven of the eighteen members of the Foreign Relations Committee –
over one third of this influential panel – are already on record
raising serious concerns about confirming a new ambassador to
Yerevan before receiving a full, open, and official explanation of
the circumstances surrounding the recall of our current ambassador,
the instructions given to our prospective ambassador, and – more
broadly – the exact nature of our government’s policy on the
Armenian Genocide,” said ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian. “In light of
the seriousness of these issues – and the lack of responsiveness
from the Administration – we were gratified that the Committee has
wisely delayed action on the new ambassador to Yerevan until these
fundamental questions have been answered.”
In the days leading up to the confirmation hearing, Senate Foreign
Relations Committee Ranking Democrat Joseph Biden (D-DE) asked
Secretary Condoleezza Rice for a thorough explanation of the
circumstances of the premature recall of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia
John Marshall Evans over his public comments affirming the Armenian
Genocide. In his June 23rd letter to Secretary Rice, Sen. Biden, a
potential 2008 Presidential candidate, stated that he would “not be
prepared to move forward with any Senate action that would
prematurely end his [Amb. Evans’] tenure in Yerevan” until a series
of questions concerning Evans’ dismissal and the State Department’s
failure to properly recognize the Armenian Genocide had been
answered. Sen. Biden wrote further to Secretary Rice, “Recalling
an accomplished American diplomat for speaking truthfully about
genocide could feed widespread cynicism about United States’
foreign policy. I hope that you will carefully reconsider the
long-term implications of this decision on the United States’
ability to promote freedom and respect for human life.”
Senator Kerry submitted a three-page set of detailed questions to
the Ambassador-Designate. Among his inquiries was the following:
During your June 28, 2006 confirmation hearing, you stated
the following when responding to a question on the State
Department’s policy on the Armenian Genocide: “I simply
studied the policy, I studied the background papers on the
policy, I know the policy and my responsibility is to
support the president.”
1) Please describe, in detail, the source, purpose,
content, and conclusions of all “policy” documents,
“background papers,” and other materials concerning the
Armenian Genocide that you reviewed and provide copies of
these materials to the Committee for its review.
Turkey has consistently denied that it committed genocide
against Armenians and in fact has jailed several
journalists for stating otherwise, as in the case of Hrant
Dink, a Turkish publisher who was convicted for simply
writing about the Armenian Genocide. And the criminal law
penalizing speech on the Armenian Genocide remains on the
books in Turkey.
1) What is the Administration’s position on these
imprisonments?
2) Do you believe the policy of non-recognition encourages
the repressive actions taken by Turkey?
Senator Sarbanes, who spoke at Wednesday’s confirmation hearing,
followed up today with a set of seven additional questions:
1) How many people died, and during what period, in the
Armenian Genocide?
2) What were the causes of these deaths?
3) What actions were taken by U.S. diplomats in Turkey at
that time to warn and report on the events?
4) What steps were taken to punish perpetrators of the
Armenian genocide?
5) How does the U.S. define “genocide”?
6) Does the United Nations consider the atrocities against
Armenians to be a “genocide”?
7) Since the Ottoman Empire is long gone, why does Turkey
view discussion of the genocide as a reflection on its own
government and people?
Among the questions asked by Senator Chafee was a request that
Ambassador-Designate Hoagland explain “the State Department’s
policy regarding statements by official US government
representatives, such as yourself, about the Armenian Genocide.”
The Rhode Island legislator also asked if the nominee had “ever
been counseled to not refer to the events of 1915 as the Armenian
Genocide.”
Sen. Dodd outlined his concerns in a letter to Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice, stating that he is “interested to learn more
about the circumstances that lead to his [Evans] departure,” noting
that “an effort, intended to destroy in whole or in part a
national, ethnical, racial or religious group, clearly constitutes
an act of genocide.”
Last week, House Armenian Genocide Resolution lead sponsors George
Radanovich (R-CA) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) joined with Congressional
Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg
(R-MI) in urging Secretary Rice to reconsider replacing Amb. Evans,
noting that “allowing John Evans to continue as Ambassador to
Armenia sends a strong message on the necessity of Turkish
recognition, and will be an important step in establishing the U.S.
position on the Armenian Genocide.”
Over the past several months, scores of Senate and House Members
have directed questions to State Department officials, calling for
answers surrounding the controversial firing of Amb. Evans,
including 60 Representatives who joined Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA)
in a letter to Secretary Rice, Rep. Grace Napolitano (D-CA) who
submitted questions to Assistant Secretary of State Dan Fried, and
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) who submitted questions to Secretary Rice.
Massachusetts Senators Ted Kennedy and John Kerry also asked
Secretary Rice for clarification on the Amb. Evans dismissal. The
Administration has either failed to provide responses or provided
responses, which have been largely perfunctory, citing that
Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the President, but giving no
clear insight into the State Department’s decision to dismiss the
career diplomat after 35 years of distinguished service.
The State Department, with the blessing of the White House, fired
Amb. Evans in response to his February 2005 statements at Armenian
American community functions, during which he properly
characterized the Armenian Genocide as “genocide.” Following his
statements, Amb. Evans was forced to issue a statement clarifying
that his references to the Armenian Genocide were his personal
views and did not represent a change in U.S. policy. He
subsequently issued a correction to this statement, replacing a
reference to the genocide with the word “tragedy.” The American
Foreign Service Association, which had decided to honor Amb. Evans
with the “Christian A. Herter Award,” recognizing creative thinking
and intellectual courage within the Foreign Service, reportedly
rescinded the award following pressure from the State Department in
the days leading up to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan’s visit to Washington, DC to meet with President Bush.
Armenian American response to Amb. Evans’ dismissal has been
widespread with thousands calling on their legislators to take
action and demand answers. In a March 8th letter to Secretary Rice,
ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian noted that “if, in fact, punitive
measures are being taken against Ambassador Evans, this would
represent a tragic retreat from our nation’s core values. It would
also represent a new low in our government’s shameful complicity in
the Turkish government’s campaign of denial. Not only does the
State Department continue to be publicly silent as Turkey
criminally prosecutes its writers and citizens for speaking about
the Armenian Genocide, it appears the State Department is following
Turkey’s lead by muzzling and punishing an American diplomat for
his speech and his acknowledgement of a genocide that is
extensively documented in the State Department’s own archives.”
In Yerevan, a candle-light vigil was held by hundreds of human
rights activists during the June 28th Senate confirmation hearing,
as part of the “Yellow Ribbon Campaign” protesting the firing the
Amb. Evans. On April 24th, tens of thousands had tied yellow
ribbons in solidarity with the U.S. Ambassador, who had stood with
the Armenian people in honoring the victims and survivors of the
Armenian Genocide.
Noah’s Ark?
rticle.php?&ArticleID=813
Noah’s Ark?
By Brannon S. Howse
© Brannon S. Howse
June 16th, 2006
How many times have you yawned at the claim “Noah’s Ark Has Been
Discovered”? Right, you say, and Elvis has been sighted again,
too. People who hoped to find the famous vessel and the legendary
voice have been pretty much in the same boat (so to speak)-No
proof. Until today.
Led by explorer, adventurer, and featured Worldview Weekend speaker
Dr. Bob Cornuke, a fourteen man crew returned this week from Iran
bearing stunning evidence that theirs is the long-anticipated even
coveted discovery of the remains of Noah’s Ark. Bob’s team consisted
of a Who’s Who of business, law, and ministry leaders including Barry
Rand (former CEO of Avis), the author and Christian apologist Josh
McDowell, Frank Turek (co-author with Norm Geisler of I Don’t Have
Enough Faith to be an Atheist), Boone Powell (former CEO of Baylor
Medical Systems), and Arch Bonnema (president of Joshua Financial).
The unusual object is perched on a slope 13,120 feet above sea
level. After studying the discovery site, Bonnema observed, “These
beams not only look like petrified wood, they are so impressive that
they look like real wood-this is an amazing discovery that may be the
oldest shipwreck in recorded history.”
Reg Lyle, oil and gas geologist said “the object appears to be a
basalt dike, however, it is absolutely uncanny that the object looks
like hand hewn timbers, even the grain and color look just like
petrified wood….I really need to keep an open mind about this.”
The team returned to the U.S. from rugged mountains in Iran with
astonishing video footage of a monstrous black formation which looks
like rock but bears the amazing image of hundreds of massive, wooden,
hand-hewn beams. Could it be the lost ark on which two of every animal
once sailed with their human rescuer?
Bob Cornuke, president of the BASE Institute, is a veteran of nearly
30 expeditions looking for yet-to-be-discovered locations and
artifacts described by the Bible. He is cautiously-but
enthusiastically-optimistic about the find: “We have no way of
confirming for sure that this object is Noah’s Ark, but it is probably
the most interesting and baffling object ever found by ark
searchers…it sure gets my heart to pumping just thinking of what it
could be.”
The arkish object is about 400 feet long and consists of rocks that
look remarkably like blackened wood beams while other rock in the area
is distinctively brown. And one visible piece is “cut” at 90-degree
angle. Even more intriguing, some of the wood-like rocks were tested
just this week and actually proved to be petrified wood, and it is
noteworthy that Scripture recounts Noah sealed his ark with pitch-a
decidedly black substance. Upon being cut open, one of these “rocks”
also divulged a marine fossil that could have only originated
undersea.
Scouring the mountains all around the object, team participant Steve
Crampton found thousands of fossilized sea shells blanketing the
landscape. Cornuke brought back a one inch thick rock slab choked with
fossilized clams.
High above the ark suspect, the team also found wood splinters and
broken pottery shards under snow and rock at the 15,300 foot level. It
showed evidence that ancients had thought this an important worship
site for hundreds-if not thousands-of years. The landing location
would also be an unusually hospitable place to live. The team notes
that every ecosystem helpful to humans and the animals is reachable
within a 25-mile radius of the ark’s location.
Cornuke initially got involved in the search for the ark after meeting
Apollo 15, moon walking astronaut Jim Irwin. In the 1980s Cornuke
participated with Irwin in several searches on Mount Ararat in Turkey
but was disappointed with the results. After several years of
frustrating expeditions, Cornuke started looking elsewhere for the
ark.
Cornuke found clues in the Bible that the ark might be on a mountain
other than the famed Mount Ararat of Turkey. His observation was based
on the Genesis 11 account that says descendants of Noah came to the
Mesopotamian valley from the east. According to Cornuke, that would
put the Biblical mountains of Ararat somewhere in the northern reaches
of Iran. He also cited ancient historians such as Nicholas of Damascus
and Flavius Josephus who wrote just before and after Christ that
timbers of the ark had survived in what would today be the higher
mountains of Iran.
Although his research is by far the most definitive ever, Dr. Cornuke
is not the first to suggest Noah’s Ark came to rest in Iran rather
than Turkey. In 1943 an army observer named Ed Davis said he saw the
ark on a high mountain in Iran. Sergeant Davis was a road construction
engineer in Iran during World War II, building army highways from the
Persian Gulf to the Caspian Sea. During his tour of duty there, some
Iranian friends told Davis of the ark and led him to the site. After
the war, Sgt. Davis passed a lie detector test affirming his testimony
about actually seeing timbers from an ark-like object high in the
mountains of Iran.
Before his death, Davis became acquainted with Bob Cornuke and gave
him a map showing the way to the object. “It was right where Ed said
it was in his map,” Cornuke relayed, “After seeing it from a distance
I thought it at first unimpressive, but once we stood on the object we
were all amazed at how it looked just like a huge pile of black and
brown stone beams.”
Mary Irwin, wife of late Apollo 15 astronaut Jim Irwin, viewed the
evidence and stated that it was “compelling and certainly could be the
actual Ark of Noah.”
Many Christians will be eager to see the pictures and video footage,
and hear the Biblical evidence for why Noah’s Ark and the mountains of
Ararat must be in Iran. Unfortunately, I also expect that Dr. Cornuke
will be venomously attacked by both Christians and non-Christians. His
discovery will greatly distress evolutionists who do not want the
story of Noah and a worldwide flood to be verified. And many
Christians that have spent years and millions of dollars searching on
Mt. Ararat in Turkey will be quick to dismiss Cornuke’s discovery out
of jealousy (and perhaps a bit of embarrassment that they spent so
much time looking in the wrong place).
Dr. Cornuke has used the Bible as his primary guidebook to one
Biblical location and artifact after another. Has he once again
overcome huge odds to make what is arguably one of the greatest
archeological discoveries of all time? Has this
crime-scene-investigator-turned-explorer pieced together clues from
years of examination and discovered the remains of Noah’s Ark?
Some of America’s leading businessmen, an attorney who has argued
several cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, and two leading
apologists believed the evidence was compelling enough that they made
a daring trip to the politically volatile state of Iran and climbed a
harsh mountain to see the object firsthand. Now that they’ve returned,
they seem anything but disappointed. Elvis may have long since left
the building, but it looks as if the Ark may have just appeared at the
door.
Karabakh settlement should meet Azerbaijan’s interests – Aliyev
ITAR-TASS, Russia
June 30 2006
Karabakh settlement should meet Azerbaijan’s interests – Aliyev
UDZHARY, Azerbaijan, June 29 (Itar-Tass) – Azerbaijani President
Ilkham Aliyev said the country’s leadership would not agree on any
peaceful deal in the Karabakh settlement that did not meet
Azerbaijan’s national interests.
Addressing the public on Thursday, Aliyev said, `Our position is open
and clear: Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity cannot be a subject for
discussions.’
He stressed that the international community recognized
Nagorno-Karabakh as an inalienable part of Azerbaijan. `This is an
excellent legal base for the peaceful solution to the problem.
Azerbaijan will not step back,’ he said.
Commenting on the 10-year-long talks, Aliyev said no results yielded.
He stressed, `Azerbaijan seeks to settle the conflict by peaceful
means, but it never agrees to lose its territories.’
L’appel d’Erdogan aux Turcs de France
Le Figaro, France
30 juin 2006
L’appel d’Erdogan aux Turcs de France
par Thierry Oberlé
LE FIGARO. – La marche de la Turquie vers l’Europe est semée
d’obstacles. Malgré tout, conservez-vous un enthousiasme intact pour
cette aventure ? Recep Tayyip ERDOGAN. – Nous savions dès le départ
que la route serait dure et nous avons eu le temps de nous habituer
aux difficultés. Notre avantage sur les candidats qui nous ont
précédés est d’être les seuls à avoir été acceptés dans l’Union
douanière avant l’ouverture des négociations.
Notre tche est ardue mais nous allons réussir. La Turquie est-elle
traitée par l’Union Européenne en candidat comme les autres ? Nos
amis nous disent que la Turquie est perçue comme un pays un peu
différent des autres nations récemment admises dans l’UE. Il y a des
petits pays d’un million d’habitants avec qui ils partagent des
valeurs et une civilisation identiques. Et puis il y a la Turquie, un
grand pays avec 73 millions d’habitants et, selon certains, une autre
civilisation. Mais cette approche commence à être dépassée. La
Turquie ne veut pas entrer dans l’Europe pour être un poids ; elle
veut au contraire alléger la charge de l’Europe. L’UE reproche à la
Turquie son refus d’ouvrir ses ports aux bateaux gréco-chypriotes.
Allez-vous prendre le risque d’une interruption des pourparlers ? On
ne peut pas imaginer que les négociations s’interrompent car il
s’agit de sujets différents. Il est tout à fait contraire à l’acquis
communautaire de mettre dans le même sac les négociations sur Chypre
et les négociations d’adhésion à l’UE. Les chapitres sont clairement
déterminés dans la feuille de route et il ne serait pas correct
d’avoir une approche politique de dossiers techniques. Parallèlement,
nous allons maintenir notre position tant que la Chypre du Nord sera
maintenue dans l’isolement. L’UE, l’ONU et nos amis américains
avaient insisté pour que nous fassions le nécessaire pour que les
Chypriotes turcs soutiennent le plan Annan. Nous avons fait pression
malgré une opposition interne et le plan a été approuvé par
référendum. Chypre du Nord a voté oui à la paix et à la cohabitation
sur l’île alors que Chypre du Sud a voté non. Aujourd’hui les
chypriotes turcs sont punis alors que les chypriotes grecs sont
récompensés. Est-ce juste ? Les négociations ne sont-elles pas un
marché de dupes dans la mesure où le dernier mot reviendra, par
référendum, aux Français qui sont plutôt hostiles à l’entrée de la
Turquie dans l’UE ? Le peuple français est notre ami. La France est
l’un des premiers investisseurs en Turquie et l’un de nos trois
principaux partenaires économiques. Paris a par le passé travaillé la
main dans la main avec Ankara dans le processus d’ouverture vers
l’Europe et l’Occident. Je suis persuadé que l’approche négative de
l’opinion française vis-à-vis de la Turquie est liée à un problème de
communication et de rupture entre les générations. Nous n’avons pas
réussi à bien nous présenter et à nous expliquer. Nous avons 500 000
citoyens qui vivent en France : il faut qu’ils s’organisent mieux
afin de rapprocher nos deux pays. Ils doivent jouer un rôle de pont.
Tant qu’ils n’auront pas de problème d’intégration nous pourrons
dépasser les difficultés. L’intégration des Turcs vous paraît-elle
réussie ? Notre population est propice à une intégration réussie.
Dans certaines régions comme l’Alsace, c’est le cas, mais cela n’est
pas encore vrai partout. Seuls 100 000 des 500 000 Turcs installés en
France sont devenus citoyens français. Il y a dans ce domaine une
espèce de conservatisme turc qu’il faut dépasser. Il faut les
convaincre d’avancer pour qu’ils deviennent dans le processus
d’intégration nos yeux, nos oreilles et notre coeur. Classez-vous la
France de l’après-référendum du 29 mai 2005 dans le camp des
«antiturcs» ? Il n’est pas question d’avoir ce genre de considération
parce qu’en politique et principalement en politique internationale
on ne peut se baser sur de la haine ou de la rancune. Mais parfois il
y a des états d’me, des humeurs. Où en sont vos relations avec Paris
au lendemain de l’affaire du projet de loi sur la criminalisation de
la négation du génocide arménien ? Les relations suivent leur cours,
mais il faut avouer que ce genre d’initiative nous attriste. Dans
aucun pays au monde le prétendu génocide arménien n’est aussi en
vogue qu’en France. Nous disons : laissons cette affaire aux
historiens. Nous ouvrons toutes nos archives, que l’Arménie et les
pays tiers qui détiennent des documents fassent de même pour
permettre d’engager ensuite un débat. J’ai envoyé une lettre au
président arménien Kocharian exprimant ce point de vue. Nous n’avons
pas eu pour le moment la réponse escomptée et je crains que la
diaspora arménienne joue un mauvais jeu.
Patrimony of Cultural Artifacts (for the record, Asbed)
Opinions
Patrimony of cultural artifacts
Recep Guvelioglu
[email protected]
26 June 2006
The matter of stolen artifacts and looted historical treasures has
been one of the most important and ongoing issues in Turkey. When I
visited the Ephesus Museum in Vienna and the Pergamum (Bergama) Museum
in Berlin, and saw many artifacts from Anatolia at the Louvre, the
British Museum and Dumbarton Oaks, my first reaction was to curse at
the looters and the international system that gives an opportunity to
looters and thieves. But when I learned that the Germans dug an
enormous shelter for the Pergamum Altar during World War II to protect
it from bombings and all the other museums took similar measures, my
view changed quickly. Even though Turkey lost those unique historical
treasures, at least humanity possessed them. Today many people from
all around the world can visit these museums. In addition, what
happened to some of the historical treasures in Turkey is well
known. The Greek columns of Side, for instance, were burned just to
get lime to build brick houses.
We have made many mistakes regarding historical artifacts, and there
are many reasons for our cultural loss. It would take at least five of
these weekly columns to discuss them all. The primary reason is our
legal system: Our laws and judicial practices. Turkey holds a treasure
trove of antiquities to protect, which is why many laws and codes were
adopted.
Yet time has proven that that system does not work.
The most famous law to preserve our cultural heritage is the “Kultur
ve Tabiat Varliklarini Koruma Yasasi” (Code of Protection of Cultural
and Natural Property, or the code of antiquities). Under this law any
ruin, artifact or cultural finding discovered falls under the state’s
patrimony and it needs to be reported to the authorities, such as
museum directors. Afterwards you have several options:
The director might be corrupt and want to have the artifacts for
himself. He might offer you one percent of its real value and threaten
to throw you in jail for illegal excavation if you don’t comply.
Let’s say the director is decent, yet he might still threaten to give
it to “the state,” in which case you will receive a paltry
compensation. In either case, you’re in trouble¦ If you decide not to
inform the authorities, you have to find a middle man to sell this
merchandise. The middle man would certainly deceive you, and if the
artifact is quite valuable you might even be murdered.
The last option is to try selling the artifact abroad, which leads to
the same problem.
The bottom line of the matter is the issue of the patrimony of
humanity’s past. Robbers destroy and loot temples and tombs. In the
eyes of ordinary people, they are cursed criminals. Some people
purchase mankind’s oldest and most exquisite creations and are proud
of their efforts; these private collectors, commercial dealers, and
museum curators view themselves as temporary caretakers of treasures.
However, collectors’ demands for these objects have created incentives
for looters to pillage archaeological sites.
“Cultural patrimony” is the question of who has the right to own and
exhibit humanity’s aesthetic and archaeological treasures.
It’s a three-sided debate. On one side, there are “internationalists”:
Academics, dealers and collectors who advocate the regulated market as
the best way to protect antiquities. The second group believes that
cultural patrimony is linked to a group of people’s identity. “Our
cultural heritage tells us who we are.” These “nationalists” generally
call for a trade that is limited, heavily regulated and open to public
scrutiny. The third party consists of archaeologists and scholars who
say that trading uproots cultural artifacts from their original place,
rendering them useless for scientific study.
The nationalists’ and archaeologists’ non-liberal amalgam of
nationalism and anti-capitalist mentality goes back to the United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO)
1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit
Import, Export, and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. It is
the first major international agreement to protect cultural property
from thieves and smugglers.
Actually it’s hard to say who’s right in the debate. In Turkey’s case,
with the current judicial system, which doesn’t give Turkish citizens
any right to buy any artifacts, and with the problems of museums which
have became like unprotected storage houses, the nationalistic
approach seems to have lost the game.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
A letter from Kurds to the EU
Opinions
A letter from Kurds to the EU
Faik Bulut
[email protected]
27 June 2006
Accession negotiations between Turkey and the European Union are
underway. The talks are concentrating on the Cyprus issue, but they
might also come to a halt as a result of that. Since the process began
the Turkish government has started to see things from a different
perspective and has discovered that it isn’t so easy to avoid its
obligations. In the future there will be many chapters which will be
extremely problematic for Ankara: From the Kurdish and religious
minority problems, asylum and migration to the role of the army and
religion in daily life and even agricultural policies.
As Turkey is now discussing that topic, the negotiations process may
be interrupted. The EU warned the Turkish government a fortnight ago
that there’s a possibility that may happen. It seems that Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan isn’t disappointed about this but he’s
rather surprised about why the EU is behaving like that and wondering
what else they want.
In fact it’s a painful process and decision time for Ankara.
Considering the negotiations to be decisive for them too, some Kurdish
circles sent a joint letter to the EU’s representative in Ankara.
Signed by the Kurdish Culture and Research Foundation (KURT-KAV) in
Istanbul, Party For Rights and Freedom (HAK-PAR), Society of Art and
Culture (Cira) in Diyarbakir, Foundation For Cultural and Social
Services in Turkey in Ankara, Kurdish National Democratic Working
Group based in Diyarbakir, Life Women’s Cooperative (YAKAKOP) in Van,
two cultural magazines, “Bir” and “Dema Nu,” in Diyarbakir, and Peri
publications in Istanbul, the letter contains four main points.
The first point in the letter is a complaint about policies of denial,
refusal and assimilation towards the Kurds, which have been in force
since the foundation of the Turkish Republic.
In the second part, those who signed the letter warn the EU about
Turkey’s unwillingness to grant the Kurds more cultural rights,
saying, “As a result of efforts by the EU, Turkey has stepped up
recognition of cultural and democratic rights. However, those steps
aren’t enough. It must also be recognized that although they haven’t
satisfied the Kurds and contributed enough to efforts for peace and
democracy, those steps have been important. However, these positive
steps are seriously and effectively resisted by those who are
influential in the administration of the state as they don’t want to
accept the rights of ethnic groups and minorities other than the
Turks.”
In the third section, the concerned Kurdish establishments express
their anxiety, saying, “We’re anxious about what’s going on. Not just
the Kurds but also all wise people in Turkey are anxious. To explain
what’s making us anxious, it’s useful to sum up what’s happened in
Turkey in the last few months:
“The blasts in Semdinli, a district in the southeastern province
Hakkari; the killing of civilians, including children, and the arrest
of hundreds, including children, in riots in Diyarbakir; the attack
against members of the Council of State; Kurds have been threatened
with death and migrated to towns and cities; elected local
administrators have been sentenced and fined, such as 37 mayors from
the pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party [DTP] and politicians because
of their comments/statements concerning the Kurdish issue; the arrest
of Kurdish intellectuals and politicians who’ve democratically
resisted the deployment of the army along the borders; terrorist
attacks whose real perpetrators are unknown; the release of retired
members of the military or officers who are still in the army and
supposedly members of the Special Forces who have been accused of
being connected to criminal gangs and involvement in the Council of
State attack.
“It seems that those who want to resolve the problem through violence
and oppression, as was the case in the past, are making great
plans. This may result in death and great destruction and also may
turn the country into hell: Until recently ethnic minorities haven’t
massacred each other. But we’re highly concerned that these racist and
chauvinist policies may to lead an unavoidable conflict between the
Kurds and Turks.”
The last section of the letter concentrates on the Kurds’
demands. They are:
1) All legal and illegal barriers to Kurdish culture, art, music and
literature should be abolished.
2) Kurdish language, first of all in the field of education, should be
approved for use in all areas of life, from primary school to
university. Kurdish language should be supported as a language of
education, and the state should allocate money from the budget for
that.
3) First of all, the primary school curriculum, as well that of the
rest of the educational sector, should be revised and assimilationist
and racist elements which are based on policies of refusal and denial
should be excluded.
4) All laws and regulations which impede the use of Kurdish and other
national and local languages on TV and radio should be abolished.
5) The names of more than 10,000 residential areas, such as cities,
and towns and geographic zones/areas (mountains, lakes, plains etc.)
should go back to the original (be it Kurdish, Armenian or Assyrian).
6) The necessary legal reforms need to be made to the right to
assemble for not only for Kurds but also for everybody; all legal
prohibitions on the right to gather should be abolished, and that
right should be guaranteed under the Constitution.
7) Taking into account the multi-ethnicity of Turkey, the Political
Parties Law and all other anti-democratic and oppressive laws should
be revised and amended.
8) The Alevis and other religious minorities should have the right to
express their culture and beliefs, and legal impediments to this
should be abolished.
9) All barriers to freedom of thought should be abolished, and freedom
of thought shouldn’t be a crime.
10) Efforts need to be made to reestablish social peace.
11) The Constitution and the law should be amended to facilitate the
development of a pluralistic, democratic and egalitarian society.
Bank on Agassi to put the super into ‘Super Saturday’
The Times July 01, 2006
Bank on Agassi to put the super into ‘Super Saturday’
By Brad Gilbert
The top tennis coach says his former pupil is not ready to take his
leave of Wimbledon yet, although Nadal will fight all the way
HAS there ever been a Wimbledon Saturday to match this one? Andre
Agassi facing Rafael Nadal followed by Andy Roddick against Andy
Murray. I’d pay £100 for a ticket. Having been coach to both Andre and
A-Rod, I’m in a privileged position. Equally, I know how important the
crowd is going to be today. They can have a decisive effect on which
way the matches swing.
Against Nadal, Andre needs to be dictating play. He needs to be on the
offence, taking it to the kid. He cannot afford to be defensive. He
has toserve well and make the rallies short – he doesn’t want ten or
12-stroke rallies to develop.
This is a big step up for him. He has seven sets under his belt, he is
familiar with the feeling of best-of-five again and against Andreas
Seppi on Thursday he was a lot better than in his first match.
Nadal was in a huge amount of trouble against Robert Kendrick, but he
got way better in the fourth and fifth sets. What impressed me most
was that he was hitting the ball harder in the fifth than he had been
in the first. He reminds me of “Marvellous” Marvin Hagler, the great
middleweight -put him in the back room and he’ll come out fighting
like nobody.
Take it from me, Agassi is pleased he’s playing Nadal. He wants this,
with great respect to Kendrick.
That’s the kind of guy he is. He loves the meat of the draw. I think
the crowd will be absolutely electric and I really believe they can
help to push him through. They want him to win. They know they will be
seeing Nadal for the next ten years, but this is the last time they’ll
have a chance toget real c lose to Andre.
I know Nadal will be a much better player today as well, but it will
be hot, the court will be a little faster and Andre has a great
shot. He will have spent last night in one of his favourite
restaurants, business as usual. I think he’ll win.
Murray played what was a practice set yesterday but it was also his
best of the tournament so far – very relaxed, in command. A-Rod hasn’t
dropped serve yet and that is the nugget of the match today. Murray
has to take care of his own serve because on this surface it’s almost
impossible to break Andy’s.
He did it three times in San Jose, but that was different.
Revenge doesn’t come into it. Roddick has only lost to Roger Federer
in this tournament in the past three years, he wants this title more
than anything else. Whether or not it’s Murray today doesn’t enter
into it.
CLASHES OF THE DAY
Andy RODDICK (US)
v Andy MURRAY (GB)
Andre AGASSI (US)
v Rafael NADAL (Sp)