Have prejudice, won’t travel

The Times, UK
May 26 2006
Have prejudice, won’t travel
Ben MacIntyre
We used to be happiest at home, away from ‘bloody foreigners’. That
was before cheap air fares

THIS SUMMER, as an antidote to all those books rhapsodising about the
Tuscan sun, you could dip into The Clumsiest People in Europe: Or,
Mrs Mortimer’s Bad-Tempered Guide to the Victorian World, which may
qualify as the most intolerant travel guide ever published. Driving
over lemons? Mrs Mortimer would rather drive over foreigners.
Mrs Favell Lee Mortimer, an Englishwoman who started out as a
children’s author, published three volumes of travel writing between
1849 and 1854, covering the globe from Asia to Africa to the
Americas. She was even-handed, in a back-handed way: she despised
just about everyone and everything.

The Portuguese, as well as being `the clumsiest people in Europe’,
are `indolent, just like the Spaniards’. The Welsh are `not very
clean’; the Zulus: `A miserable race of people’; the Greeks: `Do not
bear their troubles well; when they are unhappy, they scream like
babies’; Armenians `live in holes in the ground . . . because they
hope the Kurds may not find out where they are.’ Buddhists, Hindus,
Mohammedans: all received a thrashing from the aggressively
Protestant Mrs Mortimer.
Lao-Tzu, the father of Taoism, is dismissed as `an awful liar’. Roman
Catholicism comes off little better: `A kind of Christian religion,
but a very bad one.’ Oddly, however, she professes a soft spot for
Nubians: `A fine race . . . of a bright copper colour’.
Mrs Mortimer’s guide (which comes out in paperback next month)
provides a strange glimpse into the blinkered mind of a middle-class,
middle-aged bigot in Middle England in the middle of the 19th
century. Her sweepingly negative generalisations and racial
stereotyping seem even more remarkable for the fact that this doughty
world traveller didn’t go to the places she described and disparaged.
The sum total of her foreign travel was one childhood trip to Paris
and Brussels. Her knowledge of Taoism was exactly zero. She had never
set eyes on a Nubian. She amassed her pungent prejudices sitting in
her English drawing room.
This was once an acceptable British way to travel (or, more exactly,
stay at home and not travel). Mrs Mortimer’s all-embracing xenophobia
was probably extreme, but it was far from unique. Those sorts of
casual prejudices were part of the arrogance of empire, but also
reflected a deep-seated insecurity. Mrs Mortimer was terrified of
anybody un-English because she stayed in England.
Other countries have chauvinists, but the blanket disdain for Johnny
Foreigner was a peculiarly British phenomenon. `Don’t go abroad,’
muttered George VI, speaking for his class and most of his realm.
`Abroad’s bloody!’ Nancy Mitford’s Uncle Matthew ventured abroad
once, but `four years in France and Italy between 1914 and 1918 had
given him no great opinion of foreigners . . . `Frogs are slightly
better than Huns or Wops, but abroad is unutterably bloody and
foreigners are fiends’.’
There is a delightful line in Gosford Park, when one snobbish British
character turns to his weeping wife and hisses: `Would you stop
snivelling? One might think you were Italian!’ It is a remark that
perfectly blends snootiness, stiff-upper-lippery and ignorance.
Evelyn Waugh, so acute on so many subjects, was capable of travelling
with his eyes closed: he sneered that, from the air, Paris without
the Eiffel Tower looked like an extended High Wycombe.
Cheap and plentiful foreign air travel may be killing the planet, but
at least it has finally killed off the sort of prejudice that was
once the hallmark of the British armchair traveller. Britons today
wander in vast droves, and are informed about Abroad in a way that
would have been entirely foreign to our grandparents. Mrs Mortimer
insisted that the English `like best being at home, and this is
right’. Today the English like best being on a cheapo flight bound
for somewhere as far from home as possible. And this, it seems to me,
is right.
The World Cup will bring with it the usual bout of soul-searching
when some sunburnt, beer-drenched oik insists on performing the
`Don’t mention the war’ sketch in downtown Munich. But if this is
xenophobia, it is a pale, ironical imitation of the deeply ingrained
aversion to foreign folk that once prevailed in our culture.
Racism persists, but gone is the fear of foreignness. The British are
as likely as ever to complain that the French smell of garlic and the
Germans have no jokes. The difference is that the vast majority of
Britons know the stereotypes are not true. We no longer laugh with
Mrs Mortimer – as she points to the clumsy Portuguese and the scurvy
Greeks – but at her.
No politician could now declare, as the Earl of Crawford, a former
Tory Cabinet minister, did in 1929: `I am a xenophobe, particularly
as regards the French. I look upon France as a corrupt and corrupting
influence, and the less personal intercourse between Britain and
France the better.’
The Second World War reinforced that sense of superior isolation. The
MI5 officer responsible for interviewing suspected foreign agents
during the war compiled an official report offering observations such
as `Italy is country populated by undersized, posturing folk’. He was
not joking.
For some time after the war, the British island mentality meant
defining our nationality in contradistinction to others. `For the
English,’ David Frost and Anthony Jay once wrote,`the best definition
of hell is of a place where the Germans are the police, the Swedes
are the comedians, the Italians are the defence force . . .’. Today,
according to Crap Towns, the best English definition of hell is Hull.
We owe Mrs Mortimer a debt, for her little book is the shining
example of how not to travel in the British manner, a reminder of a
way of thinking that has gone forever.
Mrs Mortimer wrote her own epitaph: `They always laugh when they hear
of customs unlike their own; for they think that they do everything
in the best way, and that all other ways are foolish.’ Was this some
sudden flash of self-knowledge? No, this is Mrs Mortimer, sticking
the boot into the Bechuanas of South Africa.

RF Dep. Speaker: `Russia has every reason to recognize Artsakh, …”

Regnum, Russia –
May 26 2006
Russian deputy speaker: `Russia has every reason to recognize
Artsakh, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transdnestr’
`The international situation has given us a positive example – if
Albanians receive the right to establish their own independent state
in the foreign territory, so ancient Armenian people must perhaps
receive the right to restore the territory;’ leader of the Russian
Liberal Democratic Party, Deputy Speaker of Russian State Duma
Vladimir Zhirinovsky is quoted by a REGNUM correspondent as stating
in Moscow, speaking at the third Russia’s Armenian Union (RAU)
Congress.
`Yes, we pity Serbs, but it is a positive signal for the
international community – it is a positive signal for Artsakh
(Nagorno Karabakh – REGNUM), for Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and
Transdnestr,’ Zhirinovsky continued. According to him, if the
international community recognizes Kosovo and Montenegro, Russia will
have every reason to recognize analogous territories, especially as
it has more rights for that, because these republics were parts of
the Russian Empire, and now they pretend to restore their legal
personalities. `It may not be denied – it is the international law,’
he stated.
As Vladimir Zhirinovsky stressed, addressing to the Russian Armenians
Union (RAU) Congress deputies and guests, `the Armenian people have
already been suffering for 100 years, and it is necessary to achieve
adoption of at least one international organization’s resolution on
returning territories to Armenian state by 2015, the 100th
anniversary of those awful events.’ `It is not enough to recognize
the Genocide; the territories should be returned. Those ones, who are
living there now, should be returned to Ashgabat and Tashkent – what
does one people need two states for? And territories should be
returned to Armenia and Kurdistan. Kurds are betrayed people too –
they have been expecting for 100 years,’ the LDPR leader said. Also,
he called the RAU to be more active in the Russian provinces and to
cooperate with Russian political and non-governmental organizations
in order to explain to young generation of Russians that `Armenians
are our brothers; they are Christians, and they have been living side
by side with Russians for hundreds of years.’ Zhirinovsky called on
the RAU to cooperate for realization of other socially vital
initiatives.

NK Pres on Montenegro referendum: `The precedent is important’

Regnum, Russia –
May 26 2006
Nagorno Karabakh President on Montenegro referendum: `The precedent
is important’
If the international community is really ready to recognize
Montenegro and Kosovo’s independence, I believe it will be very
difficult to explain to them, why they are not ready to recognize
Nagorno Karabakh’s independence; Nagorno Karabakh President Arkady
Gukasyan, who attended the third Congress of Russia’s Armenians Union
on May 25, stated, speaking to a REGNUM correspondent. `I believe
that every question has its specificity, but, nevertheless, there are
some common positions, typical for all unrecognized states and such
conflicts – in this aspect, I believe that precedent is important,’
Gukasyan stressed, commenting on the referendum outcomes concerning
Montenegro independence.
At the same time, the NK president stressed that `Karabakh has much
more grounds – historical, legal, and geographic ones – to reckon on
independence.’
`Let us not forget that Nagorno Karabakh people defended their
independence with weapons in hands; they held out in war imposed on
it by Azerbaijan, and they are building their state now at the cost
of their best sons’ lives. I believe that we have every reason to
reckon on recognition of our independence by the international
community. In any case, I do not see any alternative for it. Nagorno
Karabakh is independent; Nagorno Karabakh will be independent, and it
does not depend on Azerbaijan’s will. This process may not be stopped
and I am sure, the international community will recognize Artsakh
sooner or later. The sooner it will do it, the more chances there
will be for prevailing of peace, order in region, and establishment
of mutual understanding between its peoples,’ Arkady Gukasyan
believes.
It is worth stressing that Montenegro may become independent as early
as in July 2006. According to outcomes of the May 21, 2006
referendum, 55.5% of inhabitants voted for Montenegro independence,
while in accordance with referendum’s conditions no less than 55% of
voters were to express some viewpoint. 86.3% of voters participated
in the referendum, which outcomes were recognized by the Serbian
authorities.

Geghamian: Orinats Yerkir Party sent to break up opposition

Regnum, Russia –
May 26 2006
Geghamian: Orinats Yerkir Party sent to break up opposition
Read it in Russian
The Orinats Yerkir Party has been sent into the opposition camp to
break it up; National Unity Party Head Artashes Geghamian stated,
while debating with Orinats Yerkir Party Head Artur Bagdassaryan on
air of Armenian Shant TV-Channel.
`Primarily Bagdassaryan and his party selflessly defended President
Robert Kocharyan, while being in the ruling coalition, and now they
got into the opposition camp, supporting People’s Party Leader Stepan
Demirchyan and accusing me that I have betrayed him in second round
of 2003 presidential elections,’ Geghamian was perplexed. Meanwhile,
the NU leader stressed, even before outcomes of the first
presidential elections’ round were processed, opposition contenders
had signed a statement that they would not take part in the
elections’ run-off. `I am not to be blamed for that Stepan Demirchyan
disavowed later his signature and decided to participate in the
run-off. I am a man of my word and I could not do so,’ Geghamian
stated. He stressed that opposition contender’s participation
legitimatized presidential elections’ second round outcomes;
President Robert Kocharyan and Defense Minister Serge Sarkisyan
counted on it. According to Geghamian, if Stepan Demirchyan had not
taken part in the second round of the 2003 presidential elections,
the international community would have not recognized its results,
ArmInfo informs.
It is worth stressing that Orinats Yerkir Party Leader Artur
Bagdassaryan recently publicly accused Artashes Geghamian at a
parliamentary session that, having not supported Stepan Demirchyan’s
candidature in the run-off of the 2003 presidential elections, he
betrayed opposition and fulfilled, in such way, order of Defense
Minister Serge Sarkisyan, who expressed his assurance several days
before the second round that the opposition would not be able to
unite around a single presidential contender.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Abiyev: Our aim to restore territorial integrity of Azerbaijan

Today, Azerbaijan
May 26 2006
Safar Abiyev: “Our aim is to restore territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan”

26 May 2006 [11:09] – Today.Az

Today Ukraine Armed Forces Main Headquarter Chief general colonel
Sergey Kirichenko has paid an official visit to Baku.

As APA reports, delegation headed by Kirichenko have visited
President Heydar Aliyev’s grave in Honorary Avenue, Martyrs’ Alley.
Defense Minister of Azerbaijan, general-colonel Safar Abiyev has
received delegation headed by Kirichenko.
After gaining independence Azerbaijan and Ukraine cooperated in all
fields, especially in military field, Azerbaijani Defense Minister
informed the guest of existed military-political situation in the
South Caucasus, Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict.
He stated that Armenia has destructive position in the settlement of
the conflict and tries to legalize the occupation of Azerbaijani
lands: “We will not give way to it. Our aim is to restore territorial
integrity of Azerbaijan.”
Kirienko said that he attaches great importance to cooperation
between Ukraine and Azerbaijan.

URL:

BAKU: Head of Democratic Reforms Party meets with Euro Parl. Reps

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
May 26 2006
Head of Democratic Reforms Party meets with European Parliaments’s reps

Source: Trend
Author: V.Sharifov

26.05.2006

Asim Mollazade, the head of the Democratic Reforms Party (DRP), met
on 25May with representatives of the European Parliament, including
Hannes Sloboda and Rob Van de Vater.
The meeting focused on the public political situation in Azerbaijan,
issues of democracy and human rights.
Mollazade spoke about the occupation of the Azerbaijani territory by
Armenia, problem evolved as a result of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,
adoption of a document by the European Union on the destruction of
the Armenian culture monuments by Azerbaijanis.
The issues of Azerbaijan’s integration to the Euro-Atlantic bodies
were also on focus.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian Fest Raises Relief

Mount Vernon Gazette, VA
May 26 2006
Armenian Fest Raises Relief
Charity, culture highlight 14th annual event.
By Greg Wyshynski
May 25, 2006
Where and When
The 14th annual Alexandria Armenian Festival is scheduled for June 3
from noon-6 p.m. in Market Square, 301 King Street. The rain or shine
event is free to the public, but the food and crafts on sale benefit
Armenian charities.
Ken Hill sees the annual Alexandria Armenian Festival as an
opportunity to raise awareness of another culture while raising money
for children in Armenia.
He said the festival, now in its 14th year, was formed after a major
earthquake devastated Gyumri, the Armenian sister city of Alexandria.
Hill, a member of the Alexandria-Gyumri committee, said 19,000 people
were killed, and “the city never really has recovered from it.” To
help children with special needs and the overall youth population,
the festival raises funds for small grants to organizations in Gyumri
and to the World Bank, which Hill said will match contributions
10-to-1. “Every thousand we put in, they put in 10,000,” he said.
The Armenian Festival is scheduled for June 3 from noon-6 p.m. in
Market Square (301 King Street). The rain or shine event is free to
the public, but the food and crafts on sale benefit Armenian
charities.
Food will be the primary fundraiser, according to Hill. He said the
festival partners with area Armenian churches to create dishes with a
homemade taste. “It’s authentic stuff. It’s not purchased off the
shelf,” he said.
Sam Gyulnazarian, a committee member, said labor in making the food
is donated, and some particular foods are donated as well.
The festival will feature an array of kabobs, usually around three
different kinds. There will also be stuffed grape leaves, lamejun,
humus, salads, and several desert options.
Entertainment includes traditional Armenian folk dancers,
instrumentals, soloists, and performing arts groups. There will be
displays inside of city hall on Armenian culture and on Gyumri.
For additional information, call the Alexandria events hotline at
703-883-4686 or visit

www.ci.alexandria.va.us/recreation.

MP: Serge Sargsyan’s Nomination Involves A Negative Tendency

`SERGE SARGSYAN’S NOMINATION INVOLVES A NEGATIVE TENDENCY’
Lragir.am
26 May 06
Commenting on the statement made by Garnik Isagulyan, adviser to
president, that Serge Sargsyan is the best-prepared presidential
candidate, and Robert Kocharyan will not run for the third term,
Member of Parliament Vahram Baghdasaryan, People’s Deputy, said, `In
these years we saw that this candidate is really prepared and is
well-aware of both home and foreign political situation, what
generally takes place in the country; he is not a fortuitous and new
figure to be debated. He has matured to be nominated president.’ For
the third term of Robert Kacharyan, Vahram Baghdasaryan said, `I am a
man of law. As all of us know, the Constitution of Armenia does not
provide for a third term.’
Member of Parliament Hrant Khachatryan, Ardarutiun Alliance, says free
and lawful elections must be held independent from the personality and
number of candidates. `Serge Sargsyan is not someone who fostered the
solution of these problems, and the nomination of Serge Sargsyan
involves a negative tendency that the elections will be held like the
previous ones,’ says Hrant Khachatryan, and disagrees that Serge
Sargsyan is the best-prepared candidate.
For Robert Kocharyan, Hrant Khachatryan noted that `in some cases
Garnik Isagulyan makes statements as a well-aware person. Yet in other
cases he either tries to create weather or to spoil weather. I find it
difficult to tell which case this is.’

BAKU: Opening Border Not Recognized by Armenia Impossible -Turk Amb

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
May 26 2006
To demand opening of Turkish-Armenian border not recognized by
Armenia impossible – Turkish Amb

Source: Trend
Author: R.Abdullayev

26.05.2006

Every country, every interested side should direct efforts to the
peaceable resolution of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh. It first of all concerns Armenia, as well as other
interested sides, including the European Union, Turan Moraly, the
Turkish Ambassador to Azerbaijan, told journalists in Baku.
`The opening of the Turkish-Armenian border can be considered only
after the resolution of the disputable issues, the diplomat noted.
The problem and general dynamic of development of events linked with
opening of the border is absolutely different.’
`How is it possible to demand the opening of borders which was not
recognized even by Armenia?’ the Ambassador inquired. The theme can
not be put forward either by the European Union, or another
organization. `Let Armenia first officially recognize the border with
Turkey and introduce itself as a good neighbor, then we will discuss
the issue.’ the Turkish diplomat concluded.

Prosperity Or Unification

PROSPERITY OR UNIFICATION
Lragir.am
26 May 06
Aghasi Arshakyan, National Unity Party, thinks that new political
parties are established when the existing political parties and their
ideologies are not sufficient to improve the situation. `They are set
up to improve the situation and the founders must sooner or later
account who is to blame for the situation.’ Nevertheless, Aghasi
Arshakyan thinks that in reshaping the political sphere everyone
realizes that it will be impossible to hold new elections in an old
manner. `Therefore, new extremely powerful forces are being created.
These are artificially set on the arena. And in order to have complete
control of the entire sphere, Bargavach Hayastan Party led by a highly
respected person is set up on the one hand, and on the other hand, the
Unification for Armenia Party is established to counterbalance
Bargavach Hayastan, thinks Aghasi Arshakyan.’