ANKARA: Russia Shares Turkey’s Concerns On Kurdish Issue

RUSSIA SHARES TURKEY’S CONCERNS ON KURDISH ISSUE
Ayhan Simsek

The New Anatolian, Turkey
Nov 27 2006

Russia is deeply concerned about the looming threat of Iraq’s
disintegration and shares the concerns of Turkey on the Kurdish issue,
said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko in an interview
with a group of Turkish journalists in Moscow over the weekend.

Deputy Foreign Minister Grushko underlined that on a growing range
of international issues, including Iraq, Iran and the Arab-Israeli
conflict; positions of Russia and Turkey have become very close,
sometimes even identical. "Our relations are rising to a level of a
multifaceted partnership, a goal stipulated by our heads of states
in Dec 2004," Grushko stressed.

On Turkey’s bid to join the European Union, Russian Deputy Foreign
Minister underlined that this process should promote greater stability
and mutually beneficial international cooperation in the region,
and also raised Moscow’s expectation that Turkey’s commitments to
the EU during the accession process will not hinder development of
the multifaceted Russian-Turkish partnership.

Stressing that Russia has always advocated a comprehensive, fair and
viable solution to Cyprus problem in line with the UN resolutions,
Deputy Foreign Minister Grushko said Turkish and Greek Cypriots should
be encouraged for resumption of full-scale negotiations with the
goal of reaching a comprehensive settlement. He also said Russia is
prepared to carry on a policy of developing economic relations with
the Turkish Cypriots on condition of compliance with the principles
of international law and UN resolutions.

On the claims of the Armenian genocide and problems between Turkey
and Armenia, Alexander Grushko expressed hope that improvement of
Turkish-Armenian relations will contribute to a greater stability
in the region. "In our opinion, the parties should agree to jointly
address issues related to the genocide. Russia’s position on the issue
is well known: relations today must not be made hostage to history,"
he said. Grushko also expressed support for Turkish proposal for
establishing an international commission of historians.

"We think that implementation of the initiative on setting up an
international commission of historians, in one form or another,
could be beneficial," he said.

Here is what Deputy Foreign Minister Grushko had to tell us:

-Russia and Turkey have stepped up political cooperation in recent
years. What is Moscow’s view of the quality of bilateral relations
and their future, in particular over the next decade?

-GRUSHKO: Russian-Turkish relations have been progressing dynamically,
and political dialogue has become more active at the top level. The
leaders of the two countries have met six times since December 2004,
when the Russian head of state made an official visit to Turkey for
the first time in the history of bilateral relations.

They regularly talk on the telephone and exchange messages.

Our foreign policy departments are interacting very intensively and
effectively, as proved by a packed schedule of their consultations.

This month, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov met with his Turkish
counterpart Abdullah Gul in Moscow, First Deputy Foreign Minister
Andrei Denisov held talks with the leaders of the Turkish foreign
ministry, and two rounds of ministerial consultations were staged
in Ankara.

Our relations show that the positions of our countries coincide or
are similar on a growing range of international issues. In fact,
they are rising to a level of a multifaceted partnership. This goal
was stipulated by the heads of the two states in the Joint Political
Declaration they signed in December 2004.

Out trade and economic cooperation has given a powerful impulse to
bilateral relations. Bilateral trade amounted to $12.6 billion in
2005 and is growing at a fast rate. We expect to raise it to $25
billion by 2008.

Relations in the fuel and energy sector play a crucial part in our
cooperation. Russian companies are prepared to contribute to the
construction of underground storage facilities and other elements of
the gas infrastructure in Turkey, as well as in projects stipulating
the delivery of Russian gas to global markets via Turkey.

There are good cooperation opportunities in the generation of
electricity, including at nuclear power plants. We also regard
military-technical cooperation as a promising element of bilateral
relations.

Tourism promotes contacts on a personal level; about 2 million
Russian tourists visit Turkey every year. We have agreed to hold
events dedicated to Russian and Turkish culture in 2007 and 2008 to
encourage state cultural exchanges.

Taking into account the level of cooperation we have reached and
future possibilities, we think that Russian-Turkish relations have a
fair chance of progressing to the benefit of our nations and in the
interests of stronger regional security and development.

-How do you view Turkish foreign policy on the issues such as the
Iranian nuclear program, Iraq, and the Arab-Israeli conflict?

-GRUSHKO: On the whole Ankara’s official position on these problems
is seen as realistic and aimed at their speediest political settlement
in the interests of peace and stability in that region.

Our approaches to the solution of these problems are very close
and sometimes identical, which is a good foundation for an active
Russian-Turkish exchange of views. We value confidential communication
established between us in the recent period on the issues indicated,
and are ready to pursue it further.

-Rising sectarian violence and future of Iraq –

-What does Russia think about Iraq and its future? Does Moscow share
Ankara’s concerns about the possible disintegration of Iraq?

-GRUSHKO: We are deeply concerned about the situation in Iraq, where
a large-scale civil conflict is brewing and has already spread to the
relatively tranquil Shiite southern provinces. There is a looming
threat of Iraq’s disintegration. We stand fully for preserving its
territorial integrity, and share the concern of our Turkish partners,
including on the Kurdish issue.

We believe that the process of national reconciliation can start on
the basis of agreements reached at the meeting on Iraq held in Cairo
in November 2005 under the banner of the Arab League and attended by
the leaders of the major political forces and ethnic and religious
groups of Iraq.

Outlining a timetable for the presence of multinational forces in
Iraq may considerably ease tensions there.

We are convinced that the international community must not stop
its efforts to harmonize the warring sides’ positions. Neighboring
countries have not yet exhausted their possibilities either. Turkey
regularly attends the conferences of foreign and interior ministries
of Iraq’s neighbor countries.

Russia is prepared to contribute to drafting and implementing
any initiative that can facilitate an early stabilization of the
situation. In our opinion, a political settlement in Iraq based on
a broad consensus between Kurds and Shiite and Sunnite Arabs would
contribute to the development of a civilized model of a federative
state with a balance of interests of the regions and the federal
center.

-Turkey’s EU perspective, Cyprus question-

-Accession to the European Union is a major priority of Turkey’s
foreign policy. What do you think are the possible reflections of
Turkey’s EU process to the Turkish-Russian relations?

-GRUSHKO: We are closely monitoring Ankara’s intention to become
a full member of the EU. In our opinion, this process, which will
depend on the sovereign decisions of Turkey and the EU countries,
should promote greater security and stability, and mutually beneficial
international cooperation in the region, and should prevent tensions
and the appearance of division lines.

We believe that issues directly bearing on Russian-Turkish
relations can appear on the agenda at the early stages of EU-Turkish
negotiations. One of them can concern compatibility between bilateral
contracts and agreements and EU norms regulating foreign trade,
energy relations, transport, visa regimes, and so on.

Russia does not want Turkey’s commitments to the EU to hinder the
development of multifaceted Russian-Turkish partnership, trade and
economic cooperation, or complicate the entry of Russian visitors
to Turkey. In bilateral relations with Turkey, we stress our desire
to hold prompt consultations aimed at minimizing possible negative
effects of the EU accession on Russian-Turkish relations.

-Ankara expects Russia to support it on the issue of ending the
international isolation of the Turkish Cypriots. What is Russia’s
stand on the issue of the Cyprus settlement? Will Moscow advance
relevant initiatives?

-GRUSHKO: Russia has always advocated a comprehensive, fair and
viable solution to the Cyprus problem in keeping with relevant UN
resolutions. We have worked consistently to ensure the legitimate
interests of Greek and Turkish Cypriots, and will continue to act in
this vein. We think UN Security Council resolutions and the assistance
of the UN Secretary General should be used to encourage the parties
involved in the conflict to resume full-scale negotiations.

Definite results have been attained in the past year. Dr. Ibrahim
Gambari, the UN Under-Secretary General for Political Affairs, who
visited Cyprus last July, coordinated a mechanism for starting an
inter-ethnic dialogue on the everyday life of the two communities and
on substantive issues. Both can facilitate the solution of fundamental
problems hindering a comprehensive settlement. In our opinion, the
international community and all countries working for a settlement
of the Cyprus problem should help Cypriots advance towards these goals.

We believe that steps should be taken to strengthen the leading role
of the UN in resolving the Cyprus problem and the role of the five
permanent member states as the main body of international political
monitoring. We are prepared to contribute to the resumption of the
Good Offices Mission of the UN Secretary General.

We think that the two parties’ striving for settlement should be
encouraged, and we are prepared to carry on a policy of developing
economic relations with the Turkish Cypriot community on condition of
compliance with the principles of international law and UN resolutions.

-Armenian genocide claims, international commission-

-Can Russia propose ways to settle the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and
normalize relations between Turkey and Armenia?

-GRUSHKO:We think direct Armenian-Azerbaijani contacts must be resumed
to bring about a settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh problem.

In our opinion, the recent meetings between foreign ministers were both
productive and instructive, and paved the way to solving outstanding
problems.

Russia and its partners from the OSCE Minsk Group think it crucial to
continue to discuss the positive achievements made in the Karabakh
settlement since mid-2005. We support the initiative of formalizing
the coordinated settlement principles by signing a relevant document.

As for Turkish-Armenian relations, we are confident that their
improvement could contribute to greater stability in the region. We
know that Armenian and Turkish leaders have been communicating, and
think that bilateral consultations at different levels, including a
top one, will facilitate the search for reasonable compromises.

In our opinion, the parties should agree to jointly address issues
related to the genocide. Russia’s position on the issue is well known:
relations today must not be made hostage to history. The adoption
of a relevant law in the French parliament has provoked a wave of
indignation in the Turkish community. A reply wave of anti-Armenian
sentiments would hinder the normalization of relations between Turkey
and Armenia. We think that the implementation of the initiative on
setting up an international commission of historians, in one form or
another, could be beneficial.

– The Chechen issue had at one time been a negative impact on
Turkish-Russian relations. Has the situation changed?

-GRUSHKO: We respect the balanced approach of the Turkish officials
to the issue of combating terrorists and separatists in the North
Caucasus, which is particularly painful to us. We welcome measures,
taken in the last years, to stop the operation of self-proclaimed
"representatives of Ichkeria" in Turkey, and hope that Ankara will
respect our antiterrorist concerns. Double standards must not be
allowed in our common fight against international terrorism.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Educating Turkey

EDUCATING TURKEY
By Nazlan Ertan

The New Anatolian, Turkey
Nov 18 2006

Opinions

The week, between the two key congresses of the right wing, was
dominated by an issue just as explosive as the congresses itself:
education.

Admittedly, education has always been the Achilles’ heel of this
government, and The New Anatolian certainly offers its tentative
praise to Huseyin Celik, who managed to keep his post as education
minister despite all the objections from the military, higher education
officials and the public. Erkan Mumcu, who now has his eyes on the
prime ministry, failed miserably in his short tenure as education
minister, attracting both the anger and the scorn of university
professors, who referred to him as "rookie" or "the boy."

But the 17th Education Convention, convening to grab headlines after
— years, proved to be a hot potato rather than an asset to the
government. First of all, the ruling Justice and Development Party
(AKP) was accused of imposing its agenda related to the university
entrance of vocational schools, namely the clergy high schools known
as imam hatip.

Given the time and effort allocated to facilitate students of
vocational schools being able to enter any university of their choice,
many accused the government of not looking at education strategy but
at its own election strategy. Presently, the graduates of vocational
schools get points in the centralized university exam when their
points are calculated for universities of the field they studied,
and have a disadvantage when they decide to switch fields. To give a
concrete example, a graduate of an imam hatip school would get extra
points if his score was calculated to enter a faculty of theology
but not for political science.

The desire to recalculate the coefficient of high school average in
the overall score has been constantly expressed by the AKP government
but was stalled by the president and the Constitutional Court.

Thus, when this issue — rather than the badly needed discussion on
Turkish education’s compatibility with international standards, the
need for adult education, the need for vocational education to meet
the needs of the public and language training — dominated the news,
many felt that this was an imposition.

Education Minister Celik defended the decisions, saying that the
ministry did not impose an agenda on the convention. He said that
several key academics will prepare reports after the convention,
which he described as a platform for free thought, and added that no
opposition party should use certain ideas expressed at the convention
as a tool to denigrate the initiative.

Like Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Celik also gave assurances
that the government respected secularism. "The Turkish Republic’s
education system is secular," he said, blaming, like the premier,
the press for ignoring the big picture and just concentrating on a
couple of mistakes or shortcomings at the convention.

The convention is now over, but alas, the problems and criticism in
the education sector are not.

Search me

One would have thought that State Minister and chief negotiator for the
EU Ali Babacan would have enough troubles without searching for more.

This time trouble went searching for him. When Danish security guards
at the Copenhagen airport wanted to search Babacan, it blew up into
a diplomatic crisis. Denmark apologized, and the event was described
as one that is "unfortunate."

"Unfortunately,&quo t; this was not an isolated action. Copenhagen security
caused similar incidents over the last two years, including one with
recently deceased former Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit in 2005. Ecevit,
arriving in the country with full documentation, was kept waiting
for half an hour during which he fell ill.

Fortunately, Babacan is in better health. Not so much can be said
of Turkish-Danish ties after the cartoon crisis and the Kurdish and
pro-PKK Roj-TV broadcasts.

French leave

The damage imposed on Turco-French ties after the French National
Assembly passed the law to penalize denial of the so-called Armenian
genocide had dropped from the front pages of newspapers. But it made
a pronounced comeback when Gen. Ilker Basbug, the commander of the
land forces, said that the military was boycotting France after the
decision. Paris tried to shrug off the remarks, only to be told the
next day, this time by Turkey’s Defense Minister Vecdi Gonul, that
France was intentionally left off the list of invitees to the Eighth
Defense Industry Fair. A French colonel reportedly left as soon as
he heard the remarks. Hurriyet daily gave the news with the headline:
"Offended by a couple of words".

ANKARA: French Have Little To Complain About, But …

FRENCH HAVE LITTLE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT, BUT …
By Ilnur Cevik

The New Anatolian, Turkey
Nov 18 2006

Opinions

It’s no secret that Turks are extremely angry and frustrated with
a French National Assembly decision to make it a crime to deny that
Turks were involved in a genocide against the Armenians at the turn
of the last century.

The Turkish government was known to have voiced its dissatisfaction
with this decision to the French administration, but it was generally
believed that Ankara would take a "wait and see" approach to observe
whether the French Senate would reject the bill or how the French
president would block it.

But a development this week showed that either the government changed
its decision and has started to prod the French not to make any wrong
calculations about Turkey’s silence or the Turkish military has jumped
the gun and has decided to punish the French…

Land Forces Commander Gen. Ilker Basbug let the cat out of the bag,
saying the military had shelved its relations with the French and
that the first-ever meeting between the Turkish and French militaries
scheduled for December was cancelled.

If this is the case, then there are several important questions to
be asked.

Was this a unilateral decision by the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK), and
if so why wasn’t it made official by the General Staff headquarters
but rather left to a Land Forces commander to make such a statement
in an informal environment like a reception?

If all this is also true, then our adversaries can once again argue
that the TSK is not acting like an institution controlled by the
elected civilian government but has a mind of its own…

If all this is not the case and it was a government decision to start
showing the French, we are unhappy then it should not have been left
to a military official to make such an announcement.

It seems the government may be involved in all this because soon
after this incident, Defense Minister Vecdi Gonul disclosed that the
French will not be officially invited to the defense fair in Ankara
scheduled for next May. The French were allegedly so annoyed that
the French Military attache who was present at the meeting for the
fair refused to attend a reception given later at the Dedeman Hotel

The French should have been prepared for all this because what they
have done has deeply hurt the Turkish people, who consider France an
old and trusted ally. What we oppose is the way all this was done

If the military is so forceful on the French issue, they should shelve
all economic relations with French companies. The military-controlled
and -funded giant OYAK company has strong ties with the French in all
sectors especially in the auto industry and in insurance. Why don’t
they show the same courage through OYAK?

Karabakh Conflict Serious Obstacle In Armenia-Turkey Relations

KARABAKH CONFLICT SERIOUS OBSTACLE IN ARMENIA-TURKEY RELATIONS

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.11.2006 14:48 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Nagorno Karabakh conflict is a serious obstacle
to the establishment of relations with Turkey, Armenian Foreign
Minister Vartan Oskanian told France Press. "Close relationships
between Turkey and Azerbaijan works against Ankara, since it undermines
Turkey’s authority in the region and its intention to become a
bridge between East and West," the Minister said adding that it’s
inadmissible to draw parallels between Nagorno Karabakh and Northern
Cyprus, since the former appeared as result of the USSR decline and
the latter -on the territory of a UN member state. Remarking that both
Armenia and Cyprus see a number of obstacles to Turkey’s accession to
the EU the Minister refuted the hearsay that the two states operate
against Turkey. "The purpose of the President’s visit to Cyprus is
to encourage economic ties. We have many topics to discuss but we do
not unite against other states," Vartan Oskanian said, reports RFE/RL.

Conference On History Of National Minorities In Turkey Held In Paris

CONFERENCE ON HISTORY OF NATIONAL MINORITIES IN TURKEY HELD IN PARIS

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.11.2006 16:08 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The history of Kurdish, Pontus Greek, Chaldean and
Armenian minorities in Turkey was discussed in a conference held in
the Parisian suburb of Versailles. The conference was held as part of
the Year of Armenia in France and attended by Pontus Greek historian
Vassia Karkayannis-Karabelias, head of the Kurdish Institute of Paris
Kendal Nezan, Secretary-General of the International Federation of
Human Rights Raffi Kalfayan and President of the Chaldean Association
of France Naman Adlun.

The French Chaldean community asserts Chaldeans were exterminated by
Turkey and built a Chaldean genocide monument in Paris last year. The
monument aroused surprise among Turkish diplomats in Paris, who have
good relations with Chaldeans. Representatives from the Chaldean
community were invited to this year’s Republic Holiday reception at
the Turkish embassy in Paris as usual despite the genocide monument,
reports zaman.com.

EU-Turkey Talks On Cyprus Failed

EU-TURKEY TALKS ON CYPRUS FAILED

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.11.2006 16:11 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Discussions between the European Union and Turkey
on the Cyprus question have failed.

"This morning I first met with Cypriot Foreign Minister Giorgios
Lillikas and then I spoke with Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah
Gul. Unfortunately we have come to the conclusion that the
preconditions for achieving an agreement do not exist at this stage
during the Finnish EU Presidency", said Finnish Foreign Minister
Erkki Tuomioja, reports CNN-Turk.

The EU has called on Turkey to open its harbors and airports to Greek
Cypriot vessels and planes by December the 6th. In return, the EU has
said that Turkish-occupied North Cyprus could be allowed to trade
directly with the EU. Turkey could face at least some obstacles in
its membership talks with the EU if it rejects the demands. However,
Gul says that he does not believe that there would be any break or
slowdown in the talks. "The Cyprus question is political, and it
should not poison our negotiation process. It is not a part of the
negotiation process", Gul said.

Ceasefire Violations: Baku Goes On Blaming Others

CEASEFIRE VIOLATIONS: BAKU GOES ON BLAMING OTHERS

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.11.2006 17:03 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Azeri side violates the ceasefire at the contact
line of the Karabakh and Azeri armed forces from time to time,
PR officer of the NKR Defense Minister, lieutenant colonel Senor
Asratyan told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter. "The Azeri armed forces
break the ceasefire themselves and then lay blame on the Armenian
side," he underscored.

Any statement on so-called ‘fire upon the Azeri army from the Armenian
side’ is misinformation spread by the Azeri media, Asratyan added.

U.S. Expert: Yerevan Has Army, Baku Has Armed Forces Only

U.S. EXPERT: YEREVAN HAS ARMY, BAKU HAS ARMED FORCES ONLY

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.11.2006 16:57 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ During debates held in the Johns Hopkins University,
Washington, senior associate at the American Foreign Policy Council
Wayne Merry described Azerbaijan’s constant threats to start blitzkrieg
as unreal. "Nagorno Karabakh is a natural stronghold, which was
consolidated by the Armenian army. Even the U.S. army will face
hardships in case of attacking it," the expert said. "The Armenian
Armed Forces excel their rival several times. It’s not a secret
that Armenia has an army while Azerbaijan has ‘armed forces’ only,"
Merry said. In his opinion, in case of resumption of war Azerbaijan
will hope for human resources while Armenia will rely on armament
and efficiency. Armenians will defend Karabakh while Azerbaijan will
have to conquer it, what is unreal, he added. Taking into account
these factors Merry considers that Azerbaijan will never succeed in
settling the Nagorno Karabakh conflict by force.

According to him, Baku’s military rhetoric constitutes a threat of
war. As a settlement variant Merry proposes ‘territories in exchange
of status’ meanwhile the Lachin corridor should remain under control
of the Armenian side, reports Yerkir Online.

Armenian And Azeri Leaders May Animate Karabakh Process

ARMENIAN AND AZERI LEADERS MAY ANIMATE KARABAKH PROCESS

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.11.2006 17:19 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents will breathe life
into efforts to resolve the long-running Nagorno Karabakh conflict
when they meet tomorrow in Minsk on the sidelines of a Commonwealth
of Independent States (CIS) summit, reports Turkish Daily News. The
new round of top-level diplomacy may be a surprise to many, since it
comes at a time when Armenia is bracing for parliamentary elections,
scheduled for May 2007. Few expected the two leaders to meet again
after their high-hope February talks behind closed doors at Rambouillet
Castle near Paris failed to produce any visible progress. International
pressure and Armenia’s growing isolation in the region may be the
key reason it is opting for a fresh diplomatic drive on the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict, diplomats and analysts say.

Armenia To Be Represented At Brazilian Carnival

ARMENIA TO BE REPRESENTED AT BRAZILIAN CARNIVAL

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.11.2006 17:59 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On the initiative of the Armenian Consulate General
in San Paolo one of the major carnival schools will represent Armenia
at the traditional Brazilian festival to take place in February
2007. One of 5 allegorical cars 18 meters long and 12 meters high
will represent Armenia as the cradle of humanity, ancient civilization
and the state of first Christians. A huge model of Ararat and Noah’s
Ark, Armenian khachkars and letters, Armenia’s golden emblem and a
7-meter flag of the Republic of Armenia will be shown. 5 000 people
will represent the school at the carnival. Brazilian film and TV
starts of Armenian origin as well as well known representatives of
the Armenian community, tourist groups from Latin America, U.S.,
Europe and Armenia will be engaged in the event to be broadcast in
over 100 countries. In the recent years when Egypt and Japan were
represented at the carnival, Egyptian Foreign Minister and Japanese
Prime Minister were present at it. In 2006 Venezuelan President Hugo
Chavez was present at the march dedicated to the struggle of the Latin
American states for independence, reports the RA MFA press office.