BAKU: Wish Of Municipality Head To Co-Operate With Armenia Can not A

WISH OF MUNICIPALITY HEAD TO CO-OPERATE WITH ARMENIA CAN NOT AFFECT FOREIGN POLICY OF TURKEY – HEAD OF IGDIR MUNICIPALITY
Author: E.Javadova

TREND, Azerbaijan
Nov 30 2006

The wish of the municipality head to co-operate with Armenia can not
affect the foreign policy of Turkey, the Head of the Igdir Municipality
(Turkey), Nurettin Aras who is on the visit to Azerbaijan briefed
the media on November 30,Trendreports.

He stressed that the Turkish Government condemns Kars for its effort
to co-operate with Armenia in various spheres. "Armenia still maintains
Nagorno-Karabakh under occupation and wants our lands, and we consider
that it is impossible to release their hands. We also consider the wish
of the municipality head to co-operate with Armenia as impossible,"
Aras said.

He expressed his regret for the erection of a monument in Kars,
which is the symbol of fraternity with Armenia.

BAKU: Armenian Forces Holding Military Training On Occupied Territor

ARMENIAN FORCES HOLDING MILITARY TRAINING ON OCCUPIED TERRITORIES
Author: Sh. Jaliloghli

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
Nov 30 2006

Armenian Forces are constantly holding military training on the
occupied territories of Azerbaijan causing significant damage to
property of the villages located not far from the contact line.

Trend Regional Correspondent reports that due to vibrations resulting
from explosions used by the Armenian military during their training,
the land and houses belonging to the inhabitants of the neighbouring
Azerbaijani villages trembles, causing serious damage to houses of
the inhabitants.

Such cases have been observed in the villages of Chiragli, Chamanli,
Ortagishlag, Murasheli of Aghdam District of Azerbaijan. Inhabitants
of the villages say that the ammunition explosions are damaging their
property making them susceptible to collapsing.

At present, the Armenian Forces are continuing their military training
on our occupied territories. Heavy artillery and arms involved in
training has resulted in loud explosions, causing the land nearby
to tremble.

BAKU: British Parliamentarian Visits Azerbaijan

BRITISH PARLIAMENTARIAN VISITS AZERBAIJAN

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Nov 30 2006

Azerbaijani vice-speaker Valeh Aleskerov has today met with the
member of House of Lords in the British Parliament Baroness O’Cathain,
Parliament Press Service told the APA.

Highly estimating the development of relations between Azerbaijan
and Great Britain, vice-speaker said that mutual visits of state
representatives play a great role in the development of cooperation.

Vaaleh Aleskerov informed the guest about the reforms and democratic
processes carried out in different spheres in Azerbaijan.

"Economic, political and cultural cooperation between Azerbaijan
and Great Britain is developing. BP Company closely partakes in the
production and transportation of oil and gas. At the same time British
companies take great interest in non-oil sector in our country,"
he said.

Valeh Aleskerov highly estimated Great Britain’s support of
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity in the settlement of Nagorno
Karabakh conflict.

Baroness O’Cathain said Azerbaijan’s influence is increasing day-by-day
in the region.

In 2007 RA To Extend Interstate Credit To NKR In The Amount Of 19, 5

IN 2007 RA TO EXTEND INTERSTATE CREDIT TO NKR IN THE AMOUNT OF 19, 5 MILLIARDS DRAMS

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
Nov 30 2006

In 2007 Armenia will extend interstate credit in the amount of 19
milliards 402 millions drams, which makes 4, 4% of Armenia’s state
budget, Head of the Permanent Commission on the NKR Parliament’s
Financial and Budget Issues Benik Bakhshiyan told KarabakhOpen.

Speaking of the outcomes of Armenia – NKR Interparliamentary
Cooperation Commission’s sitting, Benik Bakhshiyan noted top priority
had been given to the issues referring to economic cooperation.

According to the Karabakh MP, taking into consideration the fact
that during the war Karabakh’s economy had sustained considerable
casualties, the Karabakh delegation stated necessity to increase
the amount of interstate credit extended by RA to Karabakh. In his
words, RA MPs showed understanding to the reasons; however, they
added currently Armenia could not afford increasing the interstate
credit’s amount.

22 District Commissions And 278 Election Districts Established In Na

22 DISTRICT COMMISSIONS AND 278 ELECTION DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED IN NAGORNO KARABAKH TO CONDUCT REFERENDUM

Regnum, Russia
Nov 30 2006

Preparations for the referendum on constitution scheduled for
December 10, 2006, continue in Nagorno Karabakh. According to a REGNUM
correspondent in Stepanakert, 22 district commissions and 278 election
districts, as well as correspondingly as many election commission on
referendum, were created in Stepanakert.

According to Chairman of central Commission on Referendum Sergey
Nasibyan, about 90,000 people are preliminary registered as voters;
lists of voters are checked, now. 25,000 copies of constitution in
Armenian are published and sent to all settlements. Publishing the
brochures in Russian and English – for Russian-speaking population
of the republic and for international observers – is planned. A model
ballot-paper is worked out and approved; all citizens will be informed
via mass media how to fill it.

NKR citizens who have right to vote and who are temporarily in
Armenian territory will be able to participate in referendum on NKR
constitution voting at polling station E/1 situated at administrative
building of NKR permanent representation in Yerevan, Nairi Zaryan St.,
17a, Yerevan.

BAKU: Actions By Armenians To Hold "Referendum" Is Illegal – Azeri C

ACTIONS BY ARMENIANS TO HOLD "REFERENDUM" IS ILLEGAL – AZERI CEC CHAIRMAN
Author: S.Ilhamgizi

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
Nov 30 2006

The actions of the Armenian separatists to hold a so-called
"referendum" in Nagorno-Karabakh is doing nothing but attracting
attention upon themselves, the Chairman of the Central Election
Commission of Azerbaijan (CEC), Mazahir Panahov, informed Trend.

Armenian separatists plan to hold a so-called "referendum" in
Nagorno-Karabakh on 10 December, which is the occupied Azerbaijani
territory, to implement their "constitution".

Panahov stressed that the efforts of the Armenian separatists to hold
a "referendum" and any other actions are illegal. "Such measures are
aimed at only attracting attention onto themselves. We will discuss
this issue and if necessary the CEC will provide an official statement
on this issue. Even the international organizations have expressed
their feelings in which they stressed that the events taking place
in the self-voted regime are illegal. Therefore, there is no reason
to be concerned," Panahov said.

In addition, he stated that repeat elections will be held in 3
municipalities, in which the results of voting on 6 October were
canceled. The CEC will announce the date of the repeat elections. "We
will try to hold these election in the near future," Panahov stressed.

He added that at the beginning of December, the representatives of the
Azerbaijani Government will hold a meeting in the Venice Commission
of the Council of Europe and discuss the Electoral Code.

According to the CEC Chairman, the laws are always in need of
improvement and the reforms will be continued.

"Azerbaijan closely co-operates with the bodies of the Council of
Europe because Azerbaijan is a member of the organization. This
co-operation will continue in the future," Panahov emphasized.

TBILISI: Georgia: The Tkibuli Region And Rural Migration

GEORGIA: THE TKIBULI REGION AND RURAL MIGRATION
By Nicolas Landru In Tkibuli
Translated by Yvette CHIN

Caucaz.com, Georgia
Nov 30 2006

On a high plateau dominating the Imereti plain, embedded in the
foothills of the Greater Caucasus mountain range, the road leading
to the lowland town of Tkibuli is under construction. Here, the
construction workers are laying new asphalt. For the few weeks
before the October 5th local elections, the Georgian government
gave the impression that it wanted to address the stagnation of the
last fifteen years in the Okriba region in western Georgia. Work on
the Kutaisi-Tkibuli road has started. As elsewhere in the country,
in Tkibuli kindergartens and sports facilities are being built or
modernized. Next May will bring the opening of the railroad station
closed since the economic collapse of the country. However, despite
the veneer laid during election time, few here are optimistic.

"Saakashvili does everything for Tbilisi and Batumi, but he rarely
thinks of us," complains Kakha, a former miner, like the majority of
the inhabitants of Tkibuli.

The case of Okriba is different from that of the rest of Georgia.

Sparsely populated until the beginning of the 20th century, this bridge
between the Kutaisi plain and the Racha Mountains was changed by the
discovery of coal seams during the Russian Empire. Quickly exploited,
those gave way to mines, and then in 1892 the village of Tkibuli,
a mining center, federated with the neighboring villages which had
up until then been primarily agricultural.

It was in 1939 that Tkibuli acquired the status of a city. In addition
to its four coal mines, it became an extraction center for granite
and sand, and especially a center for the tea-cultivating collective
farms in the surrounding areas. To the honor of the area, even Stalin
preferred the tea of Tkibuli.

With only 39,600 inhabitants in 1986, Tkibuli never became a true
urban center. The villages surrounding it, however, were strongly
connected to its activity, so much so that agricultural activity
was abandoned there as many miners came to the area to live. Most
villagers also provided the labor for the tea plantations.

A true industrialized rural zone, the district of Tkibuli became one
of the most prosperous areas of the Soviet Union in the 1950s.

According to its inhabitants, a summer spent working on a tea
plantation was enough to pay for the construction of a house. The
miners had among the highest wages in the Soviet Union, attracting a
considerable number of migrants from other areas, primarily Russian
and Bulgarian migrants. Prosperity also supported the holiday and
tourism industries in the surrounding villages, which had sanatoria,
canteens, and pensions.

The skeleton of abundance

Today however, arrival in Tkibuli offers a dismal picture. Mines and
buildings left abandoned, stripped plaster factories, cows and pigs
grazing in industrial wastelands: built along the sinuous road, the
partly-deserted city is nothing more than a succession of concrete
blocks.

With the fall of the Soviet Union, all the state activities collapsed
in Georgia. Here, the disaster was felt more sharply, because on the
whole the republic had been industrialized remarkably little. "In Vani,
in southern Imereti, people never had many things, they did not notice
the difference much," comments Tamuna. "Here, we lost everything."

In the few months after the sudden stop of economic activity in 1991,
prosperity gave way to disaster. The inhabitants plundered their own
warehouses and took apart the equipment. They took the windows of
the factories to put them in their own apartments removed the timber
structures of the mines as firewood, and removed the rails to sell
as scrap.

Even though the mines were closed, some continued to go into them
illegally to mine coal to sell or to stay warm, risking their lives.

The safety conditions continued to worsen over the years, and accidents
were numerous. The tea plantations were also abandoned, as most were
located too far from workers’ dwellings, and as former workers can
attest, without agricultural machinery or means of transportation,
it was impossible to work the fields.

Villages without resources

Coming from the Imeretian plain or the Racha mountains, the absence
of agricultural activity in the Tkibuli area catches the eyes. Fields
have gone to seed and former rows of tea are grazed by the animals.

In the gardens of the village houses, fruit trees are rare, as are
potatoes, or other means of survival. If the townspeople point to the
poverty of the soil, it seems, however, that the neighboring areas
do not represent an improvement.

Uprooted from their rural environment, the inhabitants of about fifteen
villages surrounding Tkibuli were steered towards industrial activity
and the intensive cultivation of tea during the Soviet era.

When the collapse came, they were unable, like many of their
compatriots accustomed to agricultural work, to convert to mixed
farming to produce their own food. Rural proletarians were as destitute
as the inhabitants of the cities.

Often, the former plantation workers could cultivate tea for personal
use, but they lacked the equipment to continue commercial production.

Corn is another agricultural option in the region.

Moreover, the district lacks an irrigation system, unlike agricultural
zones like the Vani district. The imposing water tank of Tkibuli,
along the road leading to the Okriba plain, is reserved for
hydroelectric energy, would require massive work to be used as an
irrigation source. Last summer brought little rainfall, and all the
corn dried up. The rumors here suggest that Ivanishvili, the Imeritian
millionaire, wanted to purchase the tank from the state for the good
of the inhabitants, but the government refused…

Another important factor: the incomes coming from immigration and the
purchase of foodstuff are more profitable than development efforts
in an infertile area.

Inescapable rural migration

The emigration here can be seen with the naked eye. In the main
street of the village of Satsire, only two houses have lights on at
night. The young Giorgi confides, "Most of my friends are in Russia
during the year. Me, I study in Kutaisi, but I want to return here.

This is home."

According to statistics, a third of the population has left the
district. But local observers estimate even more. In the summer,
the villages and the city are repopulated; in September, men and
women seek work elsewhere.

The completely empty houses are evidence of the departure of whole
families, particularly for the suburbs of Tbilisi, if the heads of
the households found employment there in construction or as salesmen.

But if their education allows them-that is, if their language
abilities allow them-they leave their families in the countryside to
find resources abroad, generally in Russia.

These migration patterns follow personal connections. When somebody
succeeds in settling in another country, close relations or neighbors
can follow suit. "One of my friends is doing well in Italy; if the
situation here does not develop, I will join her," explains Nino.

Women seem to have an easier time finding work in Italy or in Greece,
while the majority of men, who generally have a good command of the
Russian language because of Russian military service, have easier
access to Russia.

As for those that remain, they find work here and there, in the sales
networks related to the town of Kutaisi. With local economic activity
being next to nothing, those that remain become laborers with daily
or weekly journeys to Imereti. The number of kiosks selling cigarettes
or Coca-Cola, particularly high compared to the number of inhabitants,
is a testament to the paucity of the remaining local trade.

One family out of two lives on the revenues of a family member
that has emigrated. This does not encourage households to try to
revitalize the land. Some young people, very few, remain by choice:
they will get their education in Kutaisi, although a better one is
to be had in Tbilisi, and hope to contribute to the development of
their native soil and to live there. But their chances of finding
employment there are very slim.

Signs of change?

The evolution of the general situation in Georgia is likely to
influence the prospects of the entire region. The deterioration
of relations between Tbilisi and Moscow has initially affected
Georgians in Russia. Following the problems with the Russian spies,
retaliatory measures undertaken by the Kremlin have led to actions
against Georgian immigrants. Even though the effects of these measures
are psychological-the number of Georgians expelled was insignificant
compared to the number of Georgians living in Russia-it was still
extremely powerful and, in a way, is even more strongly felt in an
area which lives almost entirely on money from abroad.

On the other hand, the renewal of economic activity in Georgia
has reached Okriba. A Dutch company has recently bought the granite
quarry to send minerals to Poti. Even if it employs only a few people,
it is a good sign for the revitalization of the area.

Two years ago, one of the coal mines of Tkibuli was privatized in
favor of Sakinvesti and has started to function again. But it seems
that the inhabitants prefer to live on foreign money rather than
re-entering one of the most dangerous trades.

Since the initiatives undertaken the day before the elections have
not stopped, it would seem that the government has taken measures
to open the area. According to a new program of assistance to poor
families, 60,000 households in the district have received financial
assistance since mid-October, one of the highest assistance rates
in the country. Moreover, the rebuilding of infrastructure and the
opening of the area suggest the possibility of renewed activity. At
the very least, the population will feel less abandoned by Tbilisi.

The visit of Prime Minister Zurab Nogaideli before the elections
helped to dissipate dissatisfaction and gave a crushing majority to
the National Movement, the party in power, at the end of the elections.

If the district of Tkibuli is an isolated case because of its
economic history, then it has the same problems as all of Georgia. In
Javakhetia, where a great majority of Armenians can be found, the
situation is more dramatic still: 60-70% of the inhabitants emigrate
regularly.

g/breve_contenu.php?id=281

http://www.caucaz.com/home_en

Commentary: Armenian Ghosts May Haunt Turkey’s EU Prospects

COMMENTARY: ARMENIAN GHOSTS MAY HAUNT TURKEY’S EU PROSPECTS
Sherwood Ross

Middle East Times, Egypt
Nov 30 2006

WASHINGTON — Turkey’s bid to join the European Union could suffer by
its refusal to admit the genocide of its Armenian Christian population
nearly a century ago.

When European Union leaders meet in Brussels December 14 to 15,
the debate to admit Turkey likely will hinge on, among other issues,
its failure to open its ports and airports to Cyprus, which opposes
all talk of membership. The Netherlands, Germany, Austria, and France
are cool to admitting Turkey and support Cyprus.

Lingering in the background, though, will be the ghosts of the
Armenian genocide, a crime Turkey has denied at every turn and is still
"investigating" to this day.

As recently as March 2005, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
called for an "impartial study" into the genocide as if the facts of
the slaughter of 1 million Armenians was ever in doubt.

When the "Young Turk" nationalists created the Republic of Turkey
after World War I, they refused to punish the perpetrators of the
1915 genocide. Mustapha Kemal formed a new government in 1920 that
forced the Allies to sign the Treaty of Lausanne, ceding Anatolia,
home of the Armenians, to Turkish control. Two years earlier Anatolia
had been parceled out to Italy and Greece after the Ottoman Empire’s
surrender to the Allies.

As author Elizabeth Kolbert put it in the November 6 The New Yorker,
"For the Turks to acknowledge the genocide would thus mean admitting
that their country was founded by war criminals and that its existence
depended on their crimes."

"Turkey has long sought to join the European Union, and, while a
history of genocide is clearly no barrier to membership, denying it
may be; several European governments have indicated that they will
oppose the country’s bid unless it acknowledges the crimes committed
against the Armenians."

So opposed is Turkey to discussion of the subject, when the US
Congress sought a resolution in 2000 to memorialize the Armenian
genocide, Turkey threatened to refuse the US use of its Incirlik
airbase and warned it might break off negotiations for the purchase
of $4.5-billion worth of Bell Textron attack helicopters.

President Bill Clinton informed House Speaker Dennis Hastert that
passage of the resolution could "risk the lives" of Americans,
and that put an end to the bill. Like his predecessor, President
George W. Bush has bowed down to Ankara’s wishes and issues Armenian
Remembrance Day proclamations, "without ever quite acknowledging what
it is that’s being remembered," The New Yorker points out.

The cover up denies Turkey’s historic victimization of some 2 million
Christian residents treated as second-class citizens by special
taxation, harassment, and extortion. After Sultan Abdulhamid II came
to power in 1876, he closed Armenian schools, tossed their teachers
in jail, organized Kurdish regiments to plague Armenian farmers, and
even forbid mention of the word "Armenia" in newspapers and textbooks.

In the last decade of the nineteenth century, Armenians were already
being slaughtered by the thousands, but systematic extermination
began April 24, 1915, with the arrest of 250 prominent Armenians in
Istanbul. In a purge anticipating Hitler’s slaughter of European Jewry,
Armenians were forced from their homes, the men led off to be tortured
and shot, the women and children shipped off to concentration camps
in the Syrian desert.

At the time, the US consul in Aleppo wrote Washington, "So severe
has been the treatment that careful estimates place the number of
survivors at only 15 percent of those originally deported. On this
basis the number surviving even this far being less than 150,000 …

there seems to have been about 1 million persons lost up to this date."

In our own time, the Turkish Historical Society published, "Facts
on the Relocation of Armenians (1914-1918)." It claims the Armenians
were relocated during the war "as humanely as possible" to keep them
from aiding the Russian armies.

In 2005, Turkish Nobel Prize recipient Orhan Pamuk, was said to
have violated Section 301 of the Rurkish penal code for "insulting
Turkishness" in an interview he gave to a Swiss newspaper. "One
million Armenians were killed and nobody but me dares to talk about
it," Pamuk said. Also, Turkish novelist Elif Shafak was brought up
on a like charge for having a fictional character in her The Bastard
of Istanbul novel discuss the genocide.

Fortunately for him, Turkish historian Tanar Akcam resides in
America. His new history, A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and
the Question of Turkish Responsibility (Metropolitan), otherwise
probably would land him in jail.

As there are few nations that have not dabbled in a bit of genocide,
one wonders why Turkey persists in its denials. After all, genocide
is hardly a bar to UN admission or getting a loan from the World Bank.

Turkey has every right to membership in the same sordid club as Spain,
Great Britain, Belgium, Russia, Germany, Italy, Japan, France, China,
and America. Why must it be so sensitive? Let them confess and sit
down with the other members to enjoy a good cup of strong coffee.

They’ll be made to feel right at home, as long as they don’t mention
Tibet, Iraq, Cambodia, the Congo, Chechnya, Timor, Darfur, Rwanda,
ad nauseam. After all, there are ghosts everywhere.
From: Baghdasarian

One Word Pope Dares Not Speak

ONE WORD POPE DARES NOT SPEAK
Sandro Contenta

Toronto Star, Canada
Nov 30 2006

Armenians won’t mention what most consider genocide, but Turks tend
to dismiss as legend

ISTANBUL, turkey-At the Armenian Patriarchate in this city’s old town,
His Beatitude Mesrob II is surrounded by icons and relics that speak
to his flock’s long history in Turkey.

But on the most tragic part of that history – the mass slaughter
of Armenians in 1915 – the Patriarch expresses a personal ignorance
typical of his followers.

Mesrob knows that five of his grandfather’s brothers were deported
to the Syrian dessert, where hundreds of thousands were massacred,
but has no idea what became of them.

His parents never spoke of their fate, despite hints that one or
two may have survived and their offspring might be living in the
United States.

"They never talked about it because I think they didn’t want us to be
at odds with our Muslim neighbours," he said in an interview. "That’s
the usual case in Turkey. We don’t tell our children about historic
events so they won’t face any problems."

For Armenians in Turkey, it’s best not to mention what most of them
consider genocide, but many Turks dismiss as a legend.

Simply mentioning the massacre often guarantees a trial on charges of
"insulting Turkishness" – a legal catch-all the justice ministry uses
to stifle challenges to state orthodoxy.

So sensitive is the topic here that Pope Benedict’s meeting with
Mesrob today will be closely watched for any allusion to the Armenian
tragedy. Benedict’s predecessor, John Paul II, recognized the killing
of Armenians by Ottoman Turks as genocide in a 2000 document.

Any mention of the word would likely cause a political storm and
destroy the charm offensive Benedict XVI has conducted since arriving
Tuesday for his four-day trip. If he strays into this political
minefield, most observers believe he’ll follow Mesrob’s example and
duck the word genocide.

Asked if he acknowledges genocide occurred, Mesrob paused awkwardly
for a moment before replying, "Ahh, I acknowledge that people were
killed, many people lost their lives."

Mesrob, whose church belongs to the family of Oriental Orthodox
churches, calls it an act of "ethnic cleansing" carried out as the
Ottoman Empire was collapsing. Some historians estimate 1.5 million
Armenians, most of them Christians, were systematically slaughtered.

An estimated 100,000 Armenians live in Turkey, one third of them
guest workers.

Murat Belge, a leading Turkish scholar who last year organized a
conference on the treatment of Armenians in 1915, said Mesrob did
well to avoid the word.

"If he had said there was an Armenian genocide, it’s very likely that
he would be assassinated by some fascists, the Patriarchate would
be burned and Armenians leading their daily lives would be shot by
unknown people," Belge said in an interview.

"And all this would be attributed by the media to the injured
nationalist feelings of the Turkish people, and the Patriarch would
be blamed for starting it all," he added.

Belge heads the publishing house that produces the novels of Orhan
Pamuk, the Nobel Prize-winning novelist charged last year for telling
a Swiss newspaper, "A million Armenians were killed and nobody but
me dares to talk about it."

Charges of "insulting Turkishness" were later dropped on a
technicality. Months later, novelist Elif Shafak was charged because
a fictional character accuses Turks of committing the genocide.

Those, too, were eventually dropped.

Turkey’s denial has hurt the Muslim country’s bid to join the 25-nation
European Union. Last month, French President Jacques Chirac said
recognizing the genocide should be a condition for membership.

The French parliament also incensed the Turkish government by passing
a bill making it a crime to deny the genocide.

Egemen Bagis, foreign policy adviser to Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan, noted Erdogan made a groundbreaking gesture last
month by offering to set up an independent inquiry with historians
on both sides of the Armenian issue. But it was rejected by Armenia
as little more than a ploy.

ver?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&col= 968350060724&c=Article&cid=1164840611284&a mp;call_pageid=968332188854

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSer

If You Are A Minority

IF YOU ARE A MINORITY
By Yelena Jetpyspayeva, exclusively for Gazeta.kz

Gazeta.KZ, Kazakhstan
Nov 30 2006

You are lucky if you are a majority. If you are a minority your life
is a struggle. Against majority.

Any society was made according to the principle "by a majority for a
majority". It is about private moral traditions, accepted and declared
by a majority. About voting system. About fashion figured on mass. Even
the market lives according the demand/supply rule formed by a majority.

But what about a minority? Any kind. Red-haired are always teased.

Adopted are not treated like "own". Physically handicapped are
discriminated. Not mentioned about national, sexual, religious and
other "not met standards".

Representatives of any kind minorities in any country in any time
had difficulties. They were struggling and defending their rights.

Sometimes paying the very high price – their life. Even formally the
highest law of any country – the Constitution – and international law
propositions – Charter on Human Rights – read that any representative
of human beings is born with equal rights.

In practice this is needed to be proven. Not every time successfully.

Which in this case should be guarantied by a state. But would the every
state support rights of the minority on which not many things depend?

In voting system the parliamentarians, who should protect our freedoms,
take part only the majority who finally takes the decision.

And the minority… Let’s re-read the beginning of the article.

And an illusory idea of human rights starts to appear only if the
state makes step over the developing country to higher level.

The image of the country and more advanced form of the partnership
on the world stage begin to play a role. Now it is necessary to enter
another "club", for VIP-persons. For instance, OSCE.

Suddenly the minority and its rights begin to matter.

Gold membership

Kazakhstan has high-flown declared: We propose ourselves for OSCE
Presidency 2009! Let’s support us!

We are young state from which you have something to learn already.

Our economy grows with confidence. More then 100 nationalities live
here in peace. Democratic reforms (not talking about its quality)
are being made however the progress will appear after you support us.

The process has been activated. Kazakhstan wants very much to hold
the presidency. That is why the sufficient political capacities are
enabled on the achievement of this aim. Although the achievement seems
to be hard. Trying to get the world support Kazakhstani publicity
became a witness that international opinions were divided.

It happens because different political interests are involved in the
game. Western countries as Germany with energy and other interests
are not against the idea of supporting Kazakhstan. The head of the
German Foreign Affairs Ministry Frank-Walter Steinmeyer meeting the
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan Kasymzhomart Tokayev even
underlined that "the presidency of Kazakhstan will help the country to
discover the potential of this international organization and give the
additional impulse to the democratization processes in the country".

However the Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan declared
that this country is "strongly objects the Kazakhstan request for
OSCE Presidency in 2009 because the republic is neutral to the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict".

Analyzing the events happening around the OSCE Presidency, you start
unwittingly understand that candidates evaluation mostly goes not
right way. Votes for and against are distributed accordingly narrow
political aims of the certain country.

As more chances to convince the opponent to support you have, as more
to get a gold membership.

To OSCE, to OSCE!

While the high politicians agree upon necessities, OSCE representatives
solve the things using their measurements. Make round tables,
meetings, hearings.

As in every international organization there are certain rules and
criteria to apply that the system for which the organization exists
could work.

On a recent OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting in Warsaw
which took place from 2 till 13 of October, 2006, different opinions
about Kazakhstan and its possible Presidency were heard.

The main themes were: freedom of speech, information and fee Mass
Media, torture prevention, human rights protection and fight against
terrorism, democratic elections, democracy on regional and local
levels, national remedial institutions, freedom of movement, meetings,
associations, thoughts, conscience, religion and beliefs.

On many of these topics we do not have very optimistic achievements.

This was discussed by invited government and civil society
representatives among which were Marzhan Aspandiyarova (Public
committee "Protect your home"), Sergey Duvanov (independent
journalist), Evgeny Zhovtis (Kazakhstani International Bureau on
Human Rights and the Rule of Law ), Daniyar Kanafin (national expert
of ODIHR OSCE), Rashid Nugmanov (International Freedom Net), Irina
Petrushova ("Republic" newspaper), Gavinda Svami (Society of Krishna
Perception), Ryspek Sarsenbayuly (Altynbek Sarsenbaiuly Foundation),
Zhemis Turmagambetova (Human Rights Charter), Sergey Utkin (indeperdent
lawyer), Ninel Fokina (Almaty Helsinki Committee), etc.

Mainly the situation with civil and political rights violation in
Kazakhstan was discussed. But also different evaluations to the
famous social and political figure of Altynbek Sarsenbayuly and his
assistants’ assassination were given.

As a result, together with the last and previous events in the field
of democracy and human rights, we have to admit that possible election
of Kazakhstan for OSCE Presidency could not get the positive solution.

But from the other side, participants however agree with the idea
of the Presidency hold by the country, counting it as important
and necessary step towards the further development, especially in
democratization as well as the integration of the country into world
community spheres.

Fair play

It is time to stop playing hide-and-seek. It is time for fair play.

Holding only intergovernmental negotiations are not enough. If decided
to hold the OSCE Presidency 2009, it is not so much time left for
the reforms country needs to carry out from inside.

Political agreements and high level meetings when Kazakhstan declares
high aims and intentions to achieve is one side of the coin.

But when it is "supported" by such things as became traditional
elections legislation violation which the international observers
declare all the time.

Or when the media and information law is changed in a way opposite
to democratic.

When the press is writing about the tragic struggle between people
living in Shanyrak district of Almaty with a police to protect their
houses from the local administration and court decision.

Not mentioning the right-wheel cars ban on the eve of the WTO
accession which leads to the car drivers’ demonstrations all over
Kazakhstan. The police block the streets and International Media
reports how the guardians made people keep silence.

Or the last but not least issue – destruction of the houses where the
representatives of "Society of Krishna Perception" live and demand
"to reject their religious belief and make in this case possible
the legalization of property as it happened before with the reps of
other religious confessions" (as it is said in the document signed
by two laborists and one liberal democrat on the eve of the Nursultan
Nazarbayev’s visit to the UK, reported by Newsru.com).

These events became rather political then business and remind not
the democratic state where everyone has a freedom of speech.

This political behaviour of different power levels in Kazakhstan
shadowed the aim which the country declared saying "We need the
OSCE Presidency".

In Europe, where the human and minority rights are highly respected,
where from recent time it is prohibited to call gypsies other then
Roma, where the EU authorities create and finance different programmes
to support national, religious, other types of minorities, these
backstage games were not understood at all.

And besides that OSCE itself gives the republic a chance to follow
the democratic reforms and make the small voice of minorities heard.

The conference on the education problems faced by ethnic minorities
in Central Asia were opened on 28th of November, 2006, in Tashkent,
Uzbekistan. The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities, Rolf
Ekeus, welcomed the decision by four Central Asian States to launch
a regular inter-state dialogue and assist each other on issues of
social integration and national minority education.

"Future co-operation in this area can, I believe, help develop
practical measures to strengthen and carry forward the modernization
process of education in Central Asia and foster the sort of
co-operation across the region that will further promote social
integration within Central Asia’s multi-ethnic nations," – Mr Ekeus
said, speaking at the conference.

He also mentioned that formalized co-operation would help ensure the
respect for the educational rights of persons belonging to national
minorities, promote good neighbourly relations and decrease the costs
of education reform.

Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan agreed to
establish four working groups on the issues of curriculum and textbook
development, language teaching, teacher training, in-service training,
as well as distance learning and IT.

They also announced the working groups would meet regularly to discuss
on-going and prospective inter-state co-operation and mutual assistance
in these four areas. A first working group meeting is scheduled to
take place early 2007.

Perhaps, this will be the real start of the way not only to help the
minorities with their rights, at least in Kazakhstan, but also to
succeed with holding the OSCE Presidency making real steps forward.

http://eng.gazeta.kz/art.asp?aid=84071