CIS Was Sole Alternative To Soviet Union – Yeltsin

CIS WAS SOLE ALTERNATIVE TO SOVIET UNION – YELTSIN

Itar-Tass
07.12.2006, 11.02

MOSCOW, December 7 (Itar-Tass) – Russia’s first president Boris Yeltsin
believes that the transformation of the former Soviet Union into the
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) was inevitable.

He said in an interview with Rossiskaya Gazeta published on Thursday
that that at the beginning of 1991, the "economic situation in the
Soviet Union was close to a collapse", triggering a political crisis
in the country.

A string of bloody conflicts flared up in the once stable and
unshakable Soviet Union: the war in Nagorno-Karabakh, the gruesome
events in Tbilisi and in the Baltic republics.

"Union authority every time made mistakes, now not acknowledging
apparent facts and now using excessive force", which "could not but
lead to a crisis of trust between the national republics and Moscow".

"It became apparent to the Kremlin that the Soviet Union cannot be
held within the old framework. And then the decision was made on the
establishment of a new Union treaty with new, broadened powers of
the republics within the USSR," Yeltsin said.

The treaty most likely would have been signed if it were not for the
putsch in August 1991 that "buried all accords on the establishment
of a new union," he said.

"Creating the CIS, leaders of the republics tried to mitigate the
consequences that the residents of the former Soviet Union could
experience from the collapse of the state."

Yeltsin stressed that "thanks to the establishment of the CIS, global
shocks, potential wars between the former republics, financial and
humanitarian catastrophes were avoided".

"I still believe that the creation of the CIS was the sole alternative
to an inevitable and uncontrollable collapse of the former Soviet
Union. And I now express gratitude to all who signed our treaty on
the creation of the CIS for shown responsibility to history and their
peoples," Yeltsin said.

He admitted that he is nostalgic for the gone USSR.

He added "it should not be forgotten that people had a very hard time
in the recent years of the USSR, both materially and spiritually. All
have somehow forgotten now what are empty counters, what it is like
to be afraid to tell your thoughts that run counter to the ‘general
line of the party’. But this must not be forgotten on any account".

Thieves Of Armenian Monument Arrested In France

THIEVES OF ARMENIAN MONUMENT ARRESTED IN FRANCE

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Dec 07 2006

CHAVILLE, DECEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. The French Police
found out thieves of the Armenian Genocide monument in Chaville. The
thieves had a goal to dissolve and sell the bronze monument with
300 kg weight on which Armenian letters were sculptured. The French
Police stated that this thievery has no political motive. 26 and
29 year old two thieves were arrested in one of Issy-les-Moulineaux
prisons. According to Marmara, the Police did not present details in
what state the monument is at present.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Time To Move Forward

TIME TO MOVE FORWARD
By Katia M. Peltekian

5th Dec 06
Aztag/Leb

The time has come for Armenians around the world to move forward. In
the past couple of decades, we have witnessed a surge of research by
independent scholars who have confirmed that what the Armenians were
subjected to – massacres and forced deportations into the desert –
was in fact Genocide. This has of course led to the recognition of
the Armenian Genocide by some governments and parliaments around the
world. Yet, we Armenians await the day when the Turkish government
would admit the crimes their ancestors committed.

Armenians are now stuck in a futile argument with the Turks, especially
with the successive Turkish government. For the time being, the debate
is going nowhere. Armenians confirm it was Genocide, Turks claim it
was not Genocide.

The argument now sounds like the following: "Yes, it was Genocide and
it has been proven by many scholars and researchers." "No it wasn’t
Genocide and our scholars and researchers can prove that." "Yes,
it was." "No, it wasn’t." " Yes." "No."

And it seems Hye Tad is caught in this circular argument, at least
for the time being.

But what else can we do? Isn’t Genocide recognition what we want? At
the same time, does Hye Tad have any plans for the "day after"? What
will we do when Turkey finally utters the word we’ve been waiting
for all our lives? The next logical step is of course demanding our
lands back, and then we will start a new argument that could go on for
ages. "Give us back our lands." "No, they are not your lands." "Yes,
they are." "No, they aren’t."

So it is time that we start focusing on the land issue and open a
new front to get what is rightfully ours. I am aware that most of us
could become skeptic and doubt whether we will ever achieve that:
after all, we’ve been unable to get the Turks to say one word; how
will we ever get them to give our lands back?

Perhaps the following news item that appeared in the Turkish newspaper
Radikal on November 7, 2006 could help us envisage our next struggle.

According to Radikal, more than a year ago (17 August, 2005), in
Turkey, Mr. Nihat Shahin, the Assistant Director of The Land Registry
Office sent a letter to the Turkish National Security Counsel. In
this letter, he asked for advice regarding the question of all
property-registration books, whether or not these documents should
be sent to the administration of the State Archives.

At the time, there was an ongoing program to update and digitalize
the old registry of real property.

Radikal continues saying: The Brigadier General of the National
Security Counsel, Mr. Tayyar Elmas, also the chief of the Department of
Mobilisation and War Planning, replied to this with a letter in which
he said: "The contents of the above-mentioned registry books dated
from the Ottoman era are liable to ethnic and political manipulations
(like the unfounded genocide, the Ottoman Foundation, property claims,
etc.). For the sake of national interests, it is undesirable that
those documents, partially or completely, be multiplied, or delivered
to centers where archival work and research are done. Hence, it is
more desirable that those books stay in the Land Registry Offices
with limited access".

Although the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan has been claiming that
the Turkish archives are open, here comes a piece of news from Turkey
itself that some of their archival material is kept out of the reach
of researchers. True, the Turkish archives have been open, but what
those archives contain is questionable. The Turks themselves have
admitted that only about 10-12% of the archival documents are open
to the public.

The Radikal journalist Murat Belge warns Erdogan that before he even
challenges Armenia and the world to open their archives, he should know
exactly what Turkey’s archives contain. The journalist further writes:
"Everybody knows that in the state archives mentioned by Mr. Erdogan
the possibility to discover something new is very small. There is no
smoking gun since there have been no official written orders. Nobody
does this. No one has discovered any written order by Hitler to
exterminate the Jews either. But undoubtedly, it is impossible in a
state mechanism that a deed in this magnitude has not been registered
somewhere in the archives."

The Land Registry Office in Turkey is concealing a crucial part of our
history. These documents give the details and the boundaries of the
lands, the names of the owners, who sold and who bought them. Research
through these documents will prove once and for all who the owners
at the time were and when and in what kind of circumstances changes
in ownership occurred.

To my knowledge, none of the branches of Hye Tad or any other
organization that primarily deals with the Armenian Question has
caught up on this news which apparently surfaced more than a year
ago, perhaps because they lack the human resources who can read and
understand the Turkish language. This needs to be amended as soon as
possible. We need more experts who can read and understand Ottoman
Turkish, who can actually be able to detect any discrepancies in
whatever archival material that is open to the public.

Regardless, the above piece of news should open another door for us.

Armenians have had the chance to sue American and French insurance
companies regarding the life insurances that their grandparents had
acquired more than 90 years ago, and many families have received the
money. But in my view, getting our lands back is much more important
than getting money.

It is time to move forward and get concrete results. We must take
the Turkish government to court and demand our lands back, one small
piece at a time.

The land registration books should contain all the necessary
registrations and any sales that could have taken place. Our
grandparents did not sell their lands before they were killed or
deported. In fact, many of us still keep this sort of documents that
our grandparents carried with them as they were deported. They lived
and died with the hope that one day they would return.

To get what is rightfully our property is not connected to whether
Turkey admits the Genocide or not. The heirs to those lands are alive
and they are now the rightful owners of those lands. We need to move
fast before these land registration documents also vanish in thin air.

"Merha-Barev" Exhibition Opens In Istanbul

"MERHA-BAREV" EXHIBITION OPENS IN ISTANBUL

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Dec 07 2006

ISTANBUL, DECEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. The exhibition
entitled "Merha-Barev," where works of 5 Armenian and 5 Turk
photographers are presented, opened in Istanbul. To recap, the
exhibition with the same title was held in autumn in Yerevan as
well. According to Marmara, the goal of the exhibition is to present
everyday life of one another to the Armenian and Turkish society.

Collective Of Chamber Music Theater Demands Restoring Dismissed Dire

COLLECTIVE OF CHAMBER MUSIC THEATER DEMANDS RESTORING DISMISSED DIRECTOR LEVON ABRAHAMIAN

Noyan Tapan
Dec 07 2006

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN. Former Director of Chamber Music
Theater, Levon Abrahamian is going to apply to the court one of these
days to litigate the decision of RA Minister of Culture and Youth
Affairs Hasmik Poghosian, according to which he was dismissed from
work on November 29. As L.Abrahamian said at the December 6 press
conference, it is a week he has been demanding that the Ministry
present him the motivation for dimissing him, but in vain.

In his words, during tete-a-tete talks with him Hasmik Poghosian
said that he was dismissed on the basis of complaint by theater’s
Art Director Armen Meliksetian whom L.Abrahamian had dismissed
from work. "I have dismissed Armen Meliksetian for violating labor
regulations for many times. And before this Armen Meliksetian had
received four written observations: he did not present the repertoire
of the new theater season, took on some people to work illegally and
hampered execution of the director’s decisions," Levon Abrahamian
declared.

At the same time, he expressed bewilderment that "director is dismissed
because one person’s complaint and the same Minister does not wish
to listen to the collective’s voice and does not wish to read the
application-complaint signed by 43 employees, with which they demand to
restore the director of their theater." Seven directors were changed
in the theater during eight years.

"Were all of them so bad that they were not able to work with Armen
Meliksetian?" L.Abrahamian asked and added: "the theater has no
repertoire, has no exact schedule. Meliksetian gave theater’s rehearsal
rooms for rent and did not transfer the money to the cash-box. The
has committed many financial violations." To recap, conflicts between
directors and the art director of the Chamber Music Theater go on
for several years. As many of employees estimate, the theater has
suffered from Armen Meliksetian’s ambitions and presumption.

Currently they support former Director Levon Abrahamian and closed the
door before the new acting director sent by the Minsitry representative
on December 6.

Yerevan Physical Training Institute Prepares 141 Rescuers In 14 Year

YEREVAN PHYSICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE PREPARES 141 RESCUERS IN 14 YEARS

Noyan Tapan
Dec 07 2006

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN. Students of the Armenian State
Istitute of Physical Training of Yerevan also actively took part in
rescue works of the disaster zone during the Spitak earthquake. And
a profession with the name "Rescuing" opened in the department of
applied types of sport of the institute in 1992. As Professor Aghvan
Chatinian, the USSR honourary rescuer, honourary trainer stated in the
interview to the Noyan Tapan correspondent, the department gave 141
graduates during the past 14 years. They at present work at the Rescue
Service, force structures, bodyguarding sphere, etc. He at the same
time mentioned that the results are satisfying, but the institute
has no possibility to get rescue instruments and hold practical
trainings. The "Spitak" rescue center, where the institute students
hold their educational practice, assists the higher educational
institution in this issue.

Order Of State Registration Of Wastes Established

ORDER OF STATE REGISTRATION OF WASTES ESTABLISHED

Noyan Tapan
Dec 06 2006

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 6, NOYAN TAPAN. The order of state registration
of wastes was established at the December 7 sitting of RA
government. Noyan Tapan was informed about it from RA government
Information and Public Relations Department. It was mentioned at
the sitting that the main goal of state registration of wastes is to
create an information bank on volumes of wastes’ emergence, which is
necessary for creating and running a state cadastre of wastes.

Creation of information bank will contribute to management of the
sphere of wastes’ use, setting of state rate, exercising of nature
protection control, working out of programs of measures aimed at
decreasing volumes of emergence of wastes.

Liturgy Dedicated To Memory Of 1988 Spitak Earthquake Victims To Be

lituRGY DEDICATED TO MEMORY OF 1988 SPITAK EARTHQUAKE VICTIMS TO BE
CELEBRATED AT AKHALKALAK SURB KHACH CHURCH

Eternal Liturgy dedicated to memory of the 1988 Spitak earthquake
victims is celebrated at the Akhalkalak Surb Khach Church on
December 7. The requiem recemony will be held at the end of the Surb
Liturgy. Javakh-Info states about it. The Samtskhe-Javakh General
Eparchic Vicariate calls on Armenians of Javakhk to take part on
December 7 in the Surb Liturgy to honour with their presence and
prayer memory of innocent victims.

Self-Immolation Attempt In Front Of Residency Of Armenian President

SELF-IMMOLATION ATTEMPT IN FRONT OF RESIDENCY OF ARMENIAN PRESIDENT

Yerevan, December 7. ArmInfo. A family of Yezids committed an
attempt of self- immolation in front of the residency of the Armenian
President.

Chairman of the Union of Yezids of Armenia Aziz Tamoyan told ArmInfo
that an action of protest was held in front of the residency Thursday
against the ineffective investigation of the murder of Kyaram Avdalyan,
a member of Yezid community, resident of Zovuni village, Kotayk
region. In the course of the protest action, the wife of the murdered
Gyulizar Amaryan and her three children committed a self-immolation
attempt. Fortunately, the fire-brigade arrived on the spot timely and
prevented the tragedy. At present, the family is in the burn center.

The relatives of the murdered believe the investigation too slow.
They accuse a group of fellow-villagers of the murder.

Tigran Torosian: "We Have No Acting Anthem At The Moment"

TIGRAN TOROSIAN: "WE HAVE NO ACTING ANTHEM AT THE MOMENT"

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN. "We have no acting anthem at the
moment," RA National Assembly Speaker Tigran Torosian stated at the
December 7 sitting. According to the constitutional amendments adopted
in 2005, the deadline for carrying out the demand to define the
state anthem by the law was December 5. In the NA Speaker’s words,
the only way out from the created situation is the possible uniting
and adoption of the draft "On the RA Anthem" of the ARF faction put on
the agenda for discussing in the 1st sitting and of the Government’s
draft of the same name already adopted in the 1st reading, but remained
out of the agenda to be discussed in the 2nd reading. T.Torosian stated
that this issue is at present being discussed with the government
representatives. Otherwise, in his words, the draft authored by
the Government may be discussed only at the special sitting of the
Parliament on convening which there is no initiative yet. To recap,
the main principle different of the 2 drafts is that by the ARF draft
"Mer Hayrenik" (Our Fatherland) acted till now is defined the anthem,
and according to the transitional principles of the Government’s draft,
it is envisaged to leave the latter in force till defining the text
and music of the anthem by the law.