April 9, 2026
The regular congress of the “Prosperous Armenia” party ended a little while ago, during which Gagik Tsarukyan was unanimously re-elected as the party’s chairman. The assembly also approved the first three dozen candidates of the PAP electoral list for the upcoming parliamentary elections.
1. Tsarukyan Gagik
2. Tevanyan Andranik
3. Louisa Sargsyan
4. Ayvazyan Ara
5. Manukyan Armen
6. Babayan Metaksya
7. Grigoryan Martun
8. Suren from Suren
9. Elinar Vardanyan
10. Hovhannisyan Vahe
11. Stepanyan Gevorg
12. Iveta Tonoyan
13. Mikael Melkumyan
14. Arman Abovyan
15. Arustamyan Nora
16. Rostomyan Hrachya
17. Arman Piroyan
18. Lianna Manukyan
19. Armen Kosakyan
20. Grigoryan Karen
21. Davtyan Nune
22. Bozoyan Yervand
23. Kakoyan Kamo
24. Karapetyan Satenik
25. Shakaryan Roman
26. Danielyan Stepan
27. Manukyan Aregnaz
28. Harutyunyan Mkhitar
29. Sergoyan Karen
30. Grigoryan Gayane
—
The deception of spectacular individual victories leading to defeat
April 9, 2026
The Republican Party announced its decision not to participate in the NA elections, while expressing its readiness to contribute to the change of power and the victory of the opposition forces by all possible means. The RPA, among other means, undertook the task of organizing various actions on the days of the European Political Community Summit to be held in Yerevan in early May and the first European Union-Armenia summit.
The RPA’s position is not typical of ordinary pre-election realities, and has nothing to do with the electoral boycott. It fully corresponds to today’s non-standard situation in Armenia, in fact to ontological threats, which can no longer be faced with classical political tools, such as elections. The problem is not the approach of the party taken separately, but in a broader sense, the concept with which any political force treats the created situation.
Today, all forces actively participating in the elections are constantly announcing their chances of winning. This concept, which is completely normal for standard situations, should be completely different in the country, where the elections will not determine the arrangement of the parliamentary forces, but even the question of the existence of the state.
In these conditions, it is conceptually important to aim not for the partial victory of the opposition forces in the elections, but for the complete defeat of the government. This is not one of those cases where the former mechanically implies the latter. Simple mathematics and sociology do not work in such cases. The victories of the opposition forces, taken separately, even if impressive, without a 100 percent defeat of the government, will result in the victory of the same government, with some, at that moment, insignificant percentage.
This means that if the CP does not leave power and does not leave unconditionally, then it becomes completely secondary which of the opposition forces will get how many mandates in the future NA. At the moment, however, the election game is going in that direction. the opposition forces are counting their future mandates, the CP is counting the days until June 7 will arrive and the counting of the opposition will move to the polling station.
At the moment, only the RPA has made an offer opposing this scheme, along with the pre-election standard competition gaining momentum with the dominance of the Communist Party, offering a conditional street as the last chance for the complete defeat of the government. Moreover, the same RPA has been consistently promoting the “Impeachment” initiative since last year, which, along with the street struggle, can become a unique non-electoral chance for a change of power. The rest of the political field has not yet responded to the RPA’s proposal, at least at the institutional level, which makes us believe that for most of the oppositionists, however, what is important is their individual victory and not the complete defeat of power.
When the political forces choose the mandate in the dilemma of the mandate and the salvation of the state, the final victory of those who caused the imperative to save the state is recorded. Their ultimate victory is the ultimate defeat of the state, which, however, is of little concern to those for whom individual victories are important in total defeats.
Harutyun Avetisyan
—
168: You have to be ready for everything. Armenia should take an example from Iran
April 9, 2026
In Iran, they do not have high hopes for the maintenance of the two-week ceasefire reached between the United States and Iran, or for the successful course of peace negotiations. At the moment, the negotiations between the delegations of Iran and the United States scheduled for Friday in Islamabad, with the mediation of Pakistan, are under question. In any case, Iran is ready for any development of events, knowing very well that violating agreements is a common phenomenon for the other side. About this 168TVof Revue reported on the air of the program Director of “Armenia-Iran Cooperation Development Fund”, Iranian expert Puya Hosseinispeaking about the cease-fire announced on April 7 and the prospects of Iran-American negotiations.
The Iranian expert emphasizes that the United States and Israel only understand the language of force, and Iran also speaks to them in the language of force, at the same time expressing readiness to sit at the negotiating table.
“Iran is ready for any development, it knows that the opposite side does not keep any agreements, has no moral norms, and now Iran is ready for anything. An agreement was reached, which is confirmed by both the Iranian side and the Pakistani side, that a ceasefire should be established on the Lebanese front, and we see that Israel is violating it by declaring that the Lebanese front is not part of the ceasefire agreement, and what kind of war crimes it committed yesterday, killing more than 250 people in Lebanon in 10 minutes. Such countries only understand the language of force, and Iran is doing everything to be able to speak with them in the language of force,” commented Puya Hosseini.
The Iranian expert referred to the violation of 3 of the 10 points presented by Iran, which were announced earlier by the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, including the point about Lebanon. According to the expert, the cease-fire agreement was tripartite: Pakistan-US-Iran, and both the Pakistani and Iranian sides confirm this agreement, while the United States and Israel claim otherwise.
“The negotiations, until this moment, are still questionable whether they will take place or not, because the violation of the Lebanon point is a serious violation. In any case, it is desirable that the negotiations take place and that peace be finally established. As Mr. Ghalibaf stated, 3 points have been violated, but let’s hope that they will be able to keep their promises until the end, but we don’t have that much hope,” says the Iranian expert.
Note that the announcement of a ceasefire after the 40-day war and Trump’s acceptance of 10 points presented by Iran, including uranium enrichment Recognition of Iran’s rights, cancellation of all primary and secondary sanctions against Iran, as well as compensation for damages suffered by Iran, the Iranians accepted it as Iran’s victory against the American superpower. To the question, who won the 40-day war, and whether Iran can be considered the winning side, Pouya Hosseini answers that it depends on the angle from which we look at the issue and analyze it.
“Iran has fought a war against several dozen times more powerful forces, two nuclear states, and resisted and inflicted devastating blows on the opponents, inflicting great damage on them both militarily, economically, and in terms of ranking, and if we look at it from that point of view, of course, Iran has won, Iran has resisted. they did not achieve their goals, as they said: in a few days, complete surrender of Iran, a coup in Iran, and the abandonment of the nuclear program. Analyzing all this, we cannot say that they won. But, in any case, analyzing the real situation, we still cannot fully consider that any side has won,” says the Iranian expert.
In this context, Pouya Hosseini talks about the keys to Iran’s success in confronting the superpower, the useful experience and lessons of the Iranian war, and Armenian-Iranian relations, noting that Armenia can also learn from Iran. With a military budget of about 10-20 billion dollars, Iran was able to fight on an equal footing with the world’s number one superpower, the United States of America and its ally Israel, with a military budget of about 1 trillion dollars. In the end, how did neighboring Iran succeed?
According to Hosseini, the biggest secret of Iran’s effective defense and diplomacy STRATEGIC RESISTANCE is. Hosseini emphasizes that Iran is the creator of the ideology of resistance in the region.
“Iran has been preparing for this war for years, and the biggest secret of this success is resistance until the end, and not resistance without a strategy, but strategic resistance, which was organized on the principle of decentralization. If we look at Iran’s military budget, it is 10-20 billion dollars, but the United States has 1 trillion, it also has the latest weapons and technologies, the latest generation fighter jets, and Israel is one of the most powerful armies in the region. Iran has learned how to fight against these forces and power relations. Iran is the creator of the ideology of resistance in the region. The secret is also in the leaders: they are ready to die for the nation, first they die, then the soldiers. I mean RESISTANCE, PERSONALITY AND NEVER GIVE UP. they are ready to fight even to the last drop of blood, and that is what gave us strength against the strongest weapons in the world,” explains the expert.
Pouya Hosseini adds: Iran-Iraq 1980-88. after the war, Iranians understood that they should rely on themselves.
“Armenia can learn many things from Iran during these wars, because Armenia is also located in a region where its enemies, the Azerbaijani-Turkish tandem, have territorial ambitions against it, and now at this moment, Armenia is moving towards peace, Armenia is in the process of establishing peace in the region, but it must be ready for everything, because there is no guarantee of peace. For that, it should take an example from Iran, how Iran was able to fight against several tens of times more powerful armies and protect its territorial integrity. Armenia can learn many things from these wars and be able to bring its armed forces to such a level that if, God forbid, there is a threat of war again against Armenia, it will be able to have a deterrent force and be able to resist the opponents,” Pouya Hosseini emphasizes.
The Iranian expert also emphasized that the “red line” defined by Iran’s spiritual leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and official Tehran regarding the territorial integrity of Armenia and the inviolability of the Armenian-Iranian border still exists for Iran today.
“If Iran emerges victorious, the security of the South Caucasus will also be strengthened. Whatever happens, Iran will protect the “red line” of Armenia. Iran wants a developed and stable Armenia in its neighborhood,” stressed Pouya Hosseini.
According to the assessment of the Iranian expert, the war will in any case also affect the TRIPP project. According to Hosseini, the TRIPP issue will depend on the outcome of this war.
Let’s remind that the United States and Israel started military operations against Iran on February 28. On the morning of April 7, US President Donald Trump set another deadline for the Islamic Republic of Iran until 20:00 of the same day, threatening to strike Iran’s power grids and transportation infrastructure and “destroy Iran’s entire civilization” if Iran does not open the Strait of Hormuz and sign a deal with the United States.
However, just an hour and a half before the end of the “deadline”, at 18:32 Washington time, Trump on his official page of the Truth Social social network announced that, with the mediation of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir, the United States agreed MONDAY TWO-WAY SHOOT CONFIRMATIONin response to their request to withdraw from the “destructive operations” planned for the night and on the condition that the Islamic Republic of Iran agrees to the complete, immediate and safe opening of the Strait of Hormuz. Donald Trump also noted that the American side accepted Iran’s 10-point proposal as a basis for negotiations.
Full interview in the video.
—
RFE/RL – Pashinian Announces More Talks With Putin
- Shoghik Galstian
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian said on Thursday that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet again shortly after Armenia’s parliamentary elections scheduled for June 7.
“We have agreed to meet at a high level, including in the second half of June,” he told journalists.
Pashinian’s most recent talks with Putin held at the Kremlin on April 1 were marked by the Russian leader’s stern public warnings to Yerevan. In particular, he warned Pashinian’s government against disqualifying pro-Russian opposition groups from the upcoming elections and implied that Armenia would pay a heavy economic price for its continued drift to the European Union.
Pashinian insisted on April 2 that his talks with Putin were “very successful.” Still, one of his top political allies, parliament speaker Alen Simonian, said two days later that Armenia will leave Russian-led defense and trade blocs if Moscow raises the concessional price of Russian natural gas or imposes other economic sanctions on the South Caucasus country. The Russian Foreign Ministry scoffed at the warning on Wednesday.
Pashinian again sought to downplay the tensions with Moscow on Thursday, saying that Russian-Armenian relations are undergoing “constructive transformation.” Hakob Badalian, an independent political analyst, suggested that his announcement of post-election talks with Putin is meant to serve the same purpose. The Armenian premier wants to show that “Russia has not read out a political verdict to Nikol Pashinian,” Badalian told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service.
In his unusually long opening remarks at the April 1 meeting with Pashinian, Putin expressed hope that Russian-Armenian ties will be strengthened “no matter how the elections in Armenia end.”
In an extensive interview with the officials TASS news agency published the following day, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Overchuk threatened far-reaching retaliatory measures against what he described as the Armenian government’s efforts to push Russia’s state-owned railway monopoly and other major companies out of Armenia. He rejected Pashinian’s recent calls for an end to Russian management of Armenia’s rail network.
The Russian Railways (RZhD) monopoly manages Armenia’s railway network in accordance with a 30-year contract signed in 2008. Pashinian said on February 13 that the network should be run by another, non-Russian company because its current status discourages Turkey and Azerbaijan from using a much larger section of Armenian territory for transit purposes in the near future. He suggested that another Turkic country, Kazakhstan, could be interested in taking over it.
The Kazakh ministers of transport and foreign affairs arrived in Yerevan from Baku late on Wednesday for talks with Pashinian and other senior Armenian officials. According to Pashinian, the talks are focusing on Kazakhstan’s possible use of a U.S.-administered transit corridor through Armenia which he has pledged to open for Azerbaijan. He said Yerevan will not cut any railway deals “behind Russia’s back.”
—
Armenian Brandy Exporter Faces Russian Ban
- Narine Ghalechian
Following President Vladimir Putin’s stern warnings to Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, Russian authorities have moved to revoke the import license of a major Armenian brandy producer heavily dependent on Russia’s market.
The state alcohol and tobacco regulator, Rosalkogoltabakkontrol, accused the Proshian Brandy Factory (PBF) of fraud earlier this week. In particular, it said, an “unplanned inspection” of brandy imported by the PBF to Russia found that it was not distilled from grapes. The agency said it has therefore asked a Russian economic court to annul the company’s license.
The company based in Proshian, a village just west of Yerevan, downplayed the measure on Wednesday, claiming that it only applies to its official distributor in Russia.
“The factory operates in a normal mode, carries out production operations without interruption and continues to export its products to international markets, including the [Eurasian Economic Union] countries,” the PBF said in a statement to RFE/RL’s Armenian Service.
For his part, Pashinian seemed to deny political motives behind the legal proceedings against the PBF when he spoke to journalists on Thursday.
Rosalkogoltabakkontrol reported the proceedings just days after Putin’s talks with Pashinian in Moscow during which he publicly warned that Yerevan’s moves to eventually join the European Union are “not compatible” with Armenia’s continued membership in the EEU, which gives Armenian exporters tariff-free access to the Russian market. Putin also said that Pashinian’s administration should not bar pro-Russian opposition groups or politicians from running in Armenia’s upcoming parliamentary elections.
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Overchuk threatened the next day far-reaching retaliatory measures against what he described as the Armenian government’s efforts to push Russia’s state-owned railway monopoly and other major companies out of Armenia. And in what looked like another related development, the head of Russia’s state agricultural watchdog reported a major tightening of its controls on multimillion-dollar imports of food and flowers from Armenia.
Russia is the principal market for agricultural products as well as alcoholic beverages exported by Armenia. According to most recent available data, Armenian brandy exports reached $311 million in 2024. Russia absorbed 83 percent of them.
Armenia’s overall exports to Russia totaled almost $3 billion last year. By comparison, Armenian firms exported $667 million worth of goods to European Union member states.
—
RFE/RL – Calls Grow For Release Of ‘Anti-Pashinian’ Student
- Naira Bulghadarian
Armenia’s human rights ombudsman appeared to add her voice on Thursday to growing calls for the release of a high school student who was arrested on March 29 after confronting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian in a church in Yerevan.
The 18-year-old man, Davit Minasian, remained, meanwhile, in hospital in what his lawyers described as serious condition.
Minasian was arrested and charged with hooliganism and obstruction of Pashinian’s “political activities” after an incident that marred a Plam Sunday Mass in St. Anne’s Church. The church was packed with worshippers when Pashinian unexpectedly arrived there with his bodyguards who cleared the way for his passage. A visibly annoyed Minasian told them not to push him and said he wants to keep “standing in the middle” of the church.
“Don’t look at me like that,” he then told Pashinian before stretching a hand towards his shoulder.
Minasian was punched and knocked down by one of the bodyguards as Pashinian left the church amid angry cries from other believers. His twin brother Mikael and another man were also detained and indicted afterwards. But they both were freed pending investigation.
Davit Minasian was rushed to Yerevan’s Nairi Medical Center on April 3 hospital after reportedly passing out at a juvenile institution just north of the Armenian capital. Only his lawyers have been allowed to visit him there. According to them, he was injured in the head and suffered concussion in the church.
“I visited him this morning,” one of the lawyers, Lusine Martirosian, told reporters. “He complained of headaches. I tried my best not to disturb him. He said he wants to sleep all the time.”
Martirosian spoke as a group of Minasian’s sympathizers gathered outside the Office of the Prosecutor-General to demand an urgent meeting with Prosecutor-General Anna Vardapetian and hand her a letter signed by 150 people demanding the student’s release. Vardapetian refused to receive them.
A similar petition circulated online earlier has been signed by thousands of other Armenians. Anahit Manasian, the human rights ombudsman installed by the country’s current leadership, insisted as recently as on Wednesday that she has no legal authority to also call for the student’s release from custody.
In an apparent change of heart, Manasian said on Thursday: “Taking into account the documents available regarding the suspect’s health condition, issues related to his right to education etc., I myself have also suggested that an alternative measure of deterrence [for the student] be considered.”
Pashinian and his political allies have defended Minasian’s arrest, saying that the student assaulted the prime minister. Armenian opposition figures counter, however, that the church incident was the result of what they see as Pashinian’s provocative behavior. They claim that Pashinian ordered the arrest in a bid to intimidate disgruntled Armenians ahead of the June 7 parliamentary elections.
Pashinian has spent the past several weekends touring various parts of the country and talking to people on what looked like election campaign trips. Some of those citizens caused him to lose his temper by openly denouncing his policies or complaining about his government’s track record.
—
‘Battle for scandal-loving voters’: Armenia’s pre-election mood
—
High demand for new housing in Armenia: what’s driving it and what to expect
—
Turkish Press: Armenian premier says he agreed with Putin on high-level June m
April 9 2026
Armenian premier says he agreed with Putin on high-level June meeting
Pashinyan says relations with Russia are in ‘constructive transformation’ as Yerevan tries to balance ties with Moscow and the EU
Burc Eruygur
09 April 2026•Update: 09 April 2026
ISTANBUL
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said on Thursday that he agreed with Russian President Vladimir Putin to hold a high-level meeting in the second half of June.
In remarks published by Armenian state news agency Armenpress, Pashinyan spoke about his recent visit to Moscow earlier this month, calling the trip “very successful.”
“Regarding the face-to-face meeting, we have already agreed on our upcoming meetings and events. We have agreed on a high-level meeting for the second half of June,” Pashinyan was quoted as saying.
Arguing that ties between Armenia and Russia are currently in a phase of “constructive transformation,” Pashinyan said he viewed this process positively and that Yerevan would continue to uphold its principles consistently.
“We will not deviate from the logic of friendly dialogue and will continue along this path,” Pashinyan added.
He also said Armenia will continue to align its policies toward the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the European Union (EU) as long as opportunities exist, adding: “When the moment of incompatibility comes, we will make decisions together with the people.”
—
Cyprus Parliament honors Armenian Genocide victims during plenary session
Armenia’s Ambassador to Cyprus, Inna Torgomyan, attended a plenary session of the House of Representatives of Cyprus, which commenced with a solemn tribute to the victims of the Armenian Genocide of 1915 in the Ottoman Empire, the Armenian Embassy in Cyprus informs.
The session opened with a special address by the President of the House of Representatives, Annita Demetriou, followed by a one-minute silence observed in memory of the victims.
A key speech during the session was delivered by Vartkes Mahdessian, the Representative of the Armenian community in the Cypriot parliament.
—